|
|
|
Cameron and the Anti-White Alliance By David Hamilton On Tommy Boyd’s talkRadio show of 17 February, Weyman Bennett described David Cameron as a supporter of the Marxist UAF! Are the Conservatives, we wonder, still the patriotic party or a Con that pretends to support the nation but, when in power, will carry on with the work of the Labour Party? Bennett accused the BNP of violence but at 2008 Red White Blue, 33 arrests were recorded - including left wing thugs throwing rocks at children and elderly people. Yet no members or supporters of the BNP were arrested. What is Cameron doing with people like that if he is a Tory? The Daily Mail of 22 January reported his speaking to think tank Demos, which is running The Progressive Conservatism Project to develop policies and ideas that are radical. Conservatives are now pursuing progressive goals like social justice, social mobility and an end to poverty, all of them once left-wing . How, they ask, can these be achieved through “conservative” means? They are turning the Conservative party into a neo-Marxist outfit like Nulab! Cameron said his party wants to abolish child poverty and increase social mobility. He listed the aims of ‘progressive Conservatism’ as:- 1. Fair society ... and said:
What people fail to understand is that the Conservative Party is no longer conservative. They should be done under Advertising Standards laws or they should change their name. They are another aspect of the PC Ideology Party. You cannot “change” the fundamental tenets of Conservatism but you can become something else behind the name. In 1991 the party got rid of the remaining traditionalists when it purged the Monday Club to make it another vehicle of neo-Marxism, PC and to serve the Globalists’ agenda. What do traditional Conservatives believe? American Conservative Robert Nisbet (1966):
The sense of belonging to a people and a putting of their interests first was shown by Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi’s Indianisation policies, commenced about 1962, in which Europeans were asked to leave their posts on the basis of race. Indigenous Indians are still given preference in India - in fact, we wouldn’t be allowed in, and if we did get in, we wouldn’t be eligible for anything. Even the Africanisation policies of Robert Mugabe, cruel and brutal though they are, and evidence that Africans cannot run a modern society, accord with this principle. Zanu PF see Zimbabwe as theirs. Likewise the ANC in South Africa. Their Africanisation policies are racist, but multi-racialists and anti-racists support racist policies if they are against “white people”! In Europe, too, the principle has been applied in the past. There was an expulsion of over 10 million people between 1945 and 1948 on the basis of race and nationality. Every country puts the interests of its own first, but our Establishment wants to see the indigenous British dispossessed in their own country. Why don’t the elites just admit they hate us and want to destroy us? In September(2008) , in a speech to the Israeli parliament, Gordon Brown called on the nations of the world to ensure that our era becomes the century of the global community. He looked forward to:
David Cameron is also a servant of the elites pushing for globalism. During his visit to Rwanda last summer, while there was severe flooding in his Whitney, Oxfordshire constituency, he showed which people he supported:
Most of his main ideological concerns are the same as the other elites and, as Brown has shown, a main part of the globalist vision is the creation of a new corporate and political network which would operate beyond nations. The Utopians believed that harmony could be made on earth not heaven by world government. H. G. Wells, the science fiction writer and socialist philosopher, was an advocate of a “permanent world congress” and specialised international agencies which would end the nation state. Patriotism, he believed, was “mere flag-waving with no constructive duties”. Now the dreamers are in power and doing it through deceit and manipulation. Cameron visited Bolton on Monday 5th January 2009 and addressed a more than 1,000 leading members of the Asian community, at the Reebok Stadium. Cameron ignored the indigenous population. He announced:
But he knows that under the EU, the “Rule of Law” and the other values he cited like “our institutions” are being scrapped. Very hypocritical! The one-sided view of racism which ignores the horrendous crimes our people are subjected to, including the routine raping of our little girls by older Muslim gangs is typical of the caste. British politics have been run by Utopians, optimists and Romantic Idealists since WWII - look at the practical consequences. The Utopians brought millions of immigrants to make our lives “better” and, still say it – Cameron is one of them.. In his 2007 party conference speech Cameron spoke without notes to suggest his possession of deeply felt beliefs. Yet he was clearly reciting a script which said nothing. He asked the audience, “What do I believe?” and answered himself, “I am by nature an optimist.” We assume his answer meant, “ Everything will turn out well in the end.” Like other “Caste” elites he has no sense of duty or honour - his political career comes first. Small differences aside the Libs, Labs, and Cons, have the same ideology and Cameron in the speech signalled that he belongs: “I think our diverse and multi-racial society is a huge benefit for Britain.” Anything less and his career is over. He joined in the Persecution of Prince Harry, demonstrating that the non-Conservatives not only won’t defend our people’s norms but won’t defend the monarchy either, as has been the party’s tradition. They are the same as the other two mainstream parties. They are servants of the intellectual and cultural elites and commerce. They are the creatures of the media. They are one with the attack upon our ways and traditions to prepare us for Utopia. Like all Utopians, Cameron is an optimist about the ultimate conclusion of British society in a multi-racial, one-world. Prospective Prime Ministers don’t question dominant state- ideology - they slot into it. Like the others, he says what he has to to get elected, not what is needed to save the country. The common features of this ilk are Political Correctness, ambition and cowardice, all of which prevents them addressing the real problems which beset us. They try to convince us that if we also fantasise that things will turn out well, they will. But things only work out well when done well. Optimists can’t solve problems that optimists have created. They thought the multiracial society would work because they thought it would. Even though their Utopia is a nightmare, they will not face it. Rather, they make us the scapegoats for everything that goes wrong by applying to us the all-purpose pejorative “racism”, a special category for whites only. The media puff up Cameron as they puffed up Gordon Brown and the Archbishop of Canterbury. Politicians are always pictured in mid-flow with their hands frozen in some expressive gesture so as to suggest that they are authority figures when, really, they are weak and inadequate. The Daily Telegraph said the speech: “…explained in detail his vision of how to change Britain.” It did no such thing. It was the same script we get from all Establishment politicians - changing this and changing that. But they never make a real point about what they are going to change - what into what, why and how? Our inadequate leaders haven’t got what it takes, and just hope something will turn up. Nothing will turn up. What they call change is more of the same in a different guise. They mean repackaging. They’ve set us on this course and they’re determined to see it through, and there will be no change until Establishment liars, cowards and parasites have been replaced by people for whom self-interest is not the prime motivating factor. Like Obama’s inaugural speech Cameron’s vision to the conference had no substance: “We need change for the long term, hope for our country and optimism for the next generation…” Mere buzz-words: “…change …long term …hope …our country …optimism …next generation,” but no ‘detailed’ explanation of the vision that the Telegraph praised. The only thing he stated with certainty was that he supports mass immigration:
If immigration isn’t the problem, what is? He enlightened us:
Families …stronger …responsible …our country …safer …greener … freedom : more buzz-words without meaning. The population does not have the same ideologically-informed view of society. They have to be browbeaten by moral lectures and corralled by totalitarian laws and a politicised police. Few indeed share his view that immigration has benefited Britain “immeasurably”, and were they “free” and not frightened of being persecuted by the state, most people would say so. What Cameron really means is that he wants people to be free to say what the “caste” want them to say, and to have control over their lives so that the “caste” can manage them in the way they want to. His knee jerk response to the faux pas of Patrick Mercer and Nigel Hastilow show what this “freedom” means - persecution of dissidents. A new kind of Tory? In his 68 minute long conference speech ostensibly about British society he didn’t refer to our Christian traditions or the threat that Islam poses to them. He is on the other side. He interpreted the worries over immigration as concern about the effect it has on services, education, health, housing, and ignored the more important effect it is having on British culture and the dispossession of ethnic Britons. Then he enthused about what he thinks important – persuading ethnic groups to become Tories. He told the audience they must:
One of “...the brightest, the best and the most talented” members of “…the ethnics” is Baroness Warsi. He was so impressed by Warsi that he wanted her on board at any price. And when she failed to make it and lost to Labour’s Shahid Malik in the 2005 general election he had her made a Baroness to encourage other Asians. She became minister responsible for ‘cohesion’. We’re in safe hands. Cameron told the conference
Baroness Warsi is a former immigration lawyer. She was involved with Operation Black Vote and the left wing pro-immigration Joseph Rowntree Trust. Last year she was co-author of a report that made the case for allowing refused asylum seekers to enter the economy. She is his Lord Ahmed, who Blair appointed to the House of Lords, swearing his oath of allegiance to Queen and Country on the Koran. Ahmed was both the first Muslim to be appointed to the Lords, and the first Lord to lead delegations on behalf of the British government to Saudi Arabia for the Haj, or Muslim pilgrimage. In February 2005 he hosted a book launch for Israel Shamir at the House of Lords, where the latter launched into a fundamentalist Muslims tirade against Zionists. This fawning on immigrants presents us as weak and afraid of them which is what emboldened Ahmed to threaten to mobilise 10,000 Muslims to stop Geert Wilders entering The Palace of Westminster! Jacqui Smith, Home secretary banned Wilders! In May 2007 Cameron stayed with a Muslim family in Birmingham and wrote in the Observer of 13th may 2007:
Cameron’s argument that otherwise peaceful Muslims can be persuaded to embrace terrorism by the mere association of the words ‘Islamist’ and ‘threat’ is either absurd or the ultimate in unintentional truths. He uses us whites as scapegoats:
It’s our fault, again. I should have guessed. “First, a concerted attack on racism and soft bigotry. You can’t even start to talk about a truly integrated society while people are suffering racist insults and abuse, as many still are in our country on a daily basis. We must also be careful about the language we use. No Muslim I’ve ever met is offended by Christmas, or supports its replacement with ‘Winterval’. But many Muslims I’ve talked to about these issues are deeply offended by the use of the word ‘Islamic’ or ‘Islamist’ to describe the terrorist threat we face today” like Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith’s call to describe Muslim terrorism as “anti-Islamic activity.” Cameron revealed the establishment agenda to de-culture as well as dispossess us:
To help shift society in this direction Cameron set up the Conservative Muslim Forum, a sort of Tory equivalent of the National Black Police Association, which ‘advises’ the Conservative Party on how best to assimilate us to Muslims. The CMF wants the compulsory history curriculum in schools changed to give full recognition to the
… and the “caste” is introducing the same agenda into our schools and teaching our children to see 7/7 through the eyes of the bombers! This is teaching our children to submit to Islam and to cover the terrorists in glory. Recently, Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari head of the Muslim Council of Britain was calling for Britain to adopt Islamic customs, and labelling us Nazis for daring to question the infinite benefits of Islam. Good old Tory values! Conservative Cameron concludes that British society is collapsing because it’s not sufficiently Asian:
Cameron’s false Conservatives, like Labour, are increasing the influence of Islam on this country. Lets end by reminding ourselves what a traditional Tory is: On May 24 1929, Stanley Baldwin, three times Prime Minister, said :“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”. Comments:2
Posted by John on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:05 | # and the “caste” is introducing the same agenda into our schools and teaching our children to see 7/7 through the eyes of the bombers! It seems odd to me that a Muslim leader would want to teach Muslim children anything about the perspective of Mossad/MI6. 3
Posted by Jewed American 'Liberators' on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:23 | # Liberators indeed - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1GrdTakvl8&feature=related Spreading freedom far and wide! 4
Posted by Armor on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:22 | #
And the Labour Party is no longer the “Labour” Party ! Labour: A social class comprising those who do manual labor or work for wages 5
Posted by Bill on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:22 | # Britain, in the opening weeks of 2009 is undergoing a transformation in terms of disquiet and perceived simmering discontent. There is little doubt this marked change of gear has been triggered by the roller coaster unravelling of what started as the credit crunch and has now emerged into a full blown recession. I detect a determined mood is now building among the British people, and it has not gone unnoticed by our political elites. So it came as no surprise when the daily press ran an article sourced by the Metropolitan Police to the effect that they (police) are warning the establishment of an almost certain risk of widespread unrest in our major cities this coming summer. What interests me most in this article is that it points out Britain’s middle classes have become sufficiently pissed off to join in any such demonstrations and could be exploited by known activists who the police think will become engaged in the protests. The article reported the government had drawn up contingency plans to deal with such disruption but were worried about the sheer numbers that could be involved. So there you have it, no matter from which angle I view this unfolding canvas I also see confrontation looming in the non too distant future. There are suggestions in the press that our government did not see the BNP gaining such solid support, so really it’s a double whammy. Brown didn’t see hurricane Katrina in the shape of the economic crisis coming and to top that he didn’t see the coming of the BNP juggernaut that is about to hit our streets. Perhaps Brown was looking through the wrong end of the telescope with his unseeing eye. (Bit like Nelson?) The next phase of the battle is being drawn, the BNP are upping the anti and going on the offensive, the elites will have no alternative other than to try and defend their actions (which they cannot) hopefully this will awaken the many from their torpor. We are moving (hopefully) into to a period of unprecedented debate, the establishment, with their brow beating political correctness has silenced the people’s voice, that is now over, the elites will have no alternative than to come out and defend themselves. To try and second guess where all this is leading boggles the mind, but there’s one thing for sure, I’m glad Brown and Co. are not getting it all there own way. How totalitarian will the totalitarians get? 6
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:19 | # Further to Bill’s comment that we are moving into a period of unprecedented debate, Geert Wilders has called for the dismantling of Europe’s hate-speech laws and the adoption of a constitutional rule for Europe analagous to the U.S.‘s First Amendment to the Constitution which stipulates that the federal government shall not abridge freedom of speech. Here is the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
7
Posted by Armor on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:31 | #
I thought he was friend with Jewish neoconservatives ! 9
Posted by Bill on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:20 | # Do you remember a conversation we had some while back about increasing the capacity of Britain’s prisons? This is when John Reid was home secretary. If I remember correctly, Reid estimated that by 2012? Britain would need to increase its prison capacity by several thousand. No reason was given as to why. I thought at the time, what do they know that they’re not telling us. I suspected they were expecting civil unrest and would need the extra capacity to incarcerate the dissidents. The Home Office also announced more prisons were programmed to built, each with a capacity of 2500 prisoners. They gave them a name, Titan (I think) Also at that time, I mentioned the building of (I think by Halliburton?) a network of large internment camps strategically dotted around the US. It didn’t seem to raise much interest here at the time but I suspect these camps are awaiting their guests for exactly the same reasons as in Britain. The US authorities are expecting trouble in the streets. The pieces of the jigsaw are coming together. 10
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:56 | #
The preponderance of wealthy and politically influential Jewry will very strongly oppose dismantling the hate-speech laws because they want nothing interfering with either the race-replacement or the Islamification of Europe currently underway. It’s taken them two hundred years to get to this point and they’re not about to let victory slip from their grasp. They see both the replacement of European Civilization with Islam and the replacement of Euro races with non-whites as pluses for Jewry and for Israel. Call them category A. Smaller factions of Jews, ones far less wealthy than the above and exerting essentially zero political influence, see things differently. They seem to be divided into those Jews who see: B) an Islamic Europe as good for Jews but race-replacement of Euros as bad for Jews, or C) an Islamic Europe as bad for Jews but race-replacement of Euros as good for Jews, or D) both as bad for Jews. Jews in categories B, C, and D will support repeal of hate-speech laws only on condition that 1) criticism of Jews and 2) questioning of the Holocau$t continue to be outlawed. The Jews in categories B, C, and D are, however, politically impotent so their views count for naught. The Jews of category A are the ones whose views count: they’re incomperably more wealthy, numerous, powerful, and influential. And they want Euros and European Civilization out of the picture. Permanently. 12
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:19 | # Speaking of the BNP, guess which party Peter Hitchens just did a hatchet-job on the other day?
13
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:39 | # The following are some of the comments on the Peter Hitchens article:
______
______
______
______
______
______
14
Posted by Glyn R on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:42 | # Is this hope for America? Or a wind-up? http://www.americannationalparty.com/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_National_Party 15
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:42 | # More comments on the Hitchens piece:
______
______
______
______
______
______
______
16
Posted by Svigor on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:47 | # Scrooby, Hitchens reminds me of what I was thinking about a few days ago. Some posters here stated that WN fantasies about WNs coming to power are just that, fantasies, and they’ll never come to pass, etc. Well, they’re right. WNs never will come to power. If WN ever gains ground (say, a million dedicated Euro men in America, leading inevitably to critical mass and widespread WNism), the western elite will simply co-opt it. They’ll grit their teeth and give up on mass importation of wage slaves. The only way this won’t happen, is if they stick to their guns and refuse to change their position, which they will NEVER do, because principle is at the very bottom of their list. There’s no way they’d go down with the ideological ship, and give over power to a bunch of unwashed deck hands. Zero chance. And that’s the only way real WNs would ever take power, I think. But who cares? I’m not in this to be secdef or ambassador to Lithuania. If they actually co-opt our ideas, it’s still a win. 18
Posted by Lurker on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:24 | # Hitchens in his own way, like Sailer, has gone just about as far as he can without falling into the abyss of WN or something like it. He is still part of the mainstream even if liberal/leftists mostly regard him as a conservative loon. 19
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:57 | # Fred, On the subject of the BNP and the press, a fair article - actually fair to the party, all things considered - appeared a few days ago in the centre-left Independent. Again the comments by nationalists are very strong and forthright, and also, I felt, coalescing around certain argumentational principles. The charge of reverse-racism is appearing regularly, which is promising since the other side has no reply. Also, the understanding that race-replacement is not an accident, but is the goal of the elites is now widespread, and that’s a good thing, too. I am starting to comment on suitable threads to the effect that nationalist politics won’t prove stable unless they are rooted in the understanding that nationalism itself is an instinct before it is idea, and an idea before it is a political movement. I’m also making the point that the BNP can only get so far with its present leadership clique and its decidedly middle-brow activist base. It has to attract the educated middle-class to progress at the national level, because power is, and will remain, the preserve of the educated. 20
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:04 | #
Yes an understanding of that is key to any ability to grasp the whole of what’s going on. There is a plan to mulattoize white populations which means of course a plan to mulattoize the white races themselves. One reason the piece by the BNP’s Joe Priestley — which I excerpted in another thread here, was so outstandingly good is the way in which Priestley doesn’t mince words or pull any punches in stating this fact. And yes, I too have noticed folk are starting to catch on to this crucial foundational aspect of what’s going on, namely that a central core of the other side’s movers and shakers, be they Jews, or communists, or homos, or clueless kum-bay-ah-type women, or just pig-ignorant or bought or hate-filled-against-their-own-race Euro fellow travelers, and so forth, actually, explicitly in their own minds, want to engineer the termination of the white races of this planet through mulattoization. You go around saying that and people think you’re insane but THERE IS NO OTHER WAY, SIMPLY NO OTHER WAY WHATSOEVER, TO INTERPRET WHAT’S GOING ON TAKEN IN ITS TOTALITY. No other way: the signs that this is the intent are unmistakable and, once you begin to catch on, crystal-clear and all around you. And the more that’s understood, the better for our side. And again, explicitness on that is one reason the Priestley piece was so outstanding, one among many. 21
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:21 | # Again, our side ultimately cannot avoid explicitness on: 1) race (the fact that there are indeed human races and they have such-and-such inborn characteristics that the mathematical Law of Large Numbers makes it impossible to change when dealing, if not with isolated individuals of this or that race, then surely with racial aggregates: you’re fighting against mathematical laws of nature, laws of reality like the law of gravity, and you are NOT going to change them: the laws of races considered not as isolated individuals of a given race but in their racial aggregates are like the laws of gravity and as unchangeable no matter what politics-based denials and wishful thinking Jews, communists, or clueless “left-wing” women come up with; 2) the by now obvious and undeniable explicit intention of the other side’s to actually race-replace the planet’s white races (a bizarre charge? yes most definitely, BUT TRUE and any white who doesn’t want to be on the receiving end of genocide HAD BETTER WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE AND BE DAMN QUICK ABOUT IT BECAUSE TIME’S RUNNING OUT!); 3) the role of the Jews. No matter how much we would prefer NOT to have to be explicit about the above three things, ultimately we CANNOT AVOID IT. Sorry. We can do it as delicately as possible, as diplomatically as possible, as non-threatening as possible, but we have to do it in the final analysis. The reason we have to is anything short of explicitness on those matters the other side will find ways to get around and we’ll be perpetually “back to square one” as the European races continue their mad rush to extinction. 22
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:29 | # as non-threateningly as possible By the way, failure to understand the need to be explicit on those three points is what has kept the paleocons perpetually at square one. 23
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:38 | # Excellent news: Haider’s party came out in first place in yesterday’s regional election in Carinthia (Austria), http://www.fdesouche.com/articles/28323 , and it was reported yesterday that Geert Wilders’ party is now running in first place in Dutch voter opinion polls, 24
Posted by SM on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:36 | # >Hitchens in his own way, like Sailer, has gone just about as far as he can without falling into the abyss of WN or something like it. He is still part of the mainstream even if liberal/leftists mostly regard him as a conservative loon. Hitchens is against islam (and now immingration?) because of his radical liberal instinct to protect wimmins (from what they have comming). FYI. His ilks schpiel is bate and switch using you as cannon fodder (once again). 25
Posted by Armor on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:56 | # From the BNP piece, written by J.Priestley, quoted by F.Scrooby :
Some of them want to destroy us. Some of them maintain the lie because they don’t know better, lack morals, are intellectually shallow or don’t know how to retreat. I wish I knew who is who. It isn’t a monolithic group. For the second group, what Priestly describes could be called “fuite en avant” in French: fleeing in the wrong direction, continuing even faster on a collision course because it seems easier than to jump off the train.
About the use of the word ‘equality’ in the media, in state constitutions, and everywhere : I think what we should say is that different people/races have equal or unequal abilities. If we say that people themselves are equal or unequal, it makes no sense. For me, equality among people means equality in social status: it is something we are given by society, not something we have in us. I do not believe that people are interchangeable and I think Africans should stay in Africa (or in Mississipi and Guadeloupe). But I am still an egalitarian: I believe in some equality of status and income in my own country. I think it’s better if every one receives more or less the same level of respect in public and if income disparity is not too big. In order to convey the idea that, in spite of physical differences, all people and all races have the same level of intelligence, morality, empathy for others, creativity, aggressiveness, and so on, I would say that all people are the same inside. I would say they are identical, not equal. Equal only applies to social status or to a particular quality. If someone is equal to me in size, intelligence, and every other aspect, I will say he is identical to me, not equal to me. Equal makes me think of mathematics. The problem is that identicalness sounds awkward, and identity already means something else. Equality is easier to use. For example: 26
Posted by Selous Scout on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:56 | # Haider’s party came out in first place in yesterday’s regional election in Carinthia (Austria), http://www.fdesouche.com/articles/28323 , and it was reported yesterday that Geert Wilders’ party is now running in first place in Dutch voter opinion polls, http://www.fdesouche.com/articles/28340. This indeed is excellent news and certain to provoke the European power elites to retaliation. How long before the next European civil war? 27
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:47 | # Good log-entry subject over at Mangan’s: http://mangans.blogspot.com/2009/02/your-anti-racist-seal-of-approval.html I read every comment. Quite a good thread as far as it went but the virtually zero mention of (fill in the blank) _______ gave it an emasculated, not-going-to-get-very-far, ineffective, missing-the-bullseye, slightly unserious feel. But hey it’s better than nothing, I don’t demand the world right off the bat, these things take time, I know that, I’m not greedy, I’ll wait. In the meantime it is very much to Mangan’s credit that he even broached the subject. We’re inching forward. We’re not standing still. 28
Posted by Lurker on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:56 | #
I’m not sure quite how that follows from what I’ve said. Maybe he is really saying what he actually means, not using a smokescreen Otoh I think Hitchens has written about topics in such a way that with one last push he might fall into the WN camp. He says just enough to appease the mainstream, I really don’t know, it’s at least possible though. Over emphasis on Islam, on the culture of Muslims, is for me a red herring, a fall back position for liberals and their handlers. But it has dangers for them, a step away from the pure open borders, flat earth kool-aid. 29
Posted by silver (himself) on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:55 | #
Mangan doesn’t get it at all. You get the impression he thinks he gets it but he certainly doesn’t get it. It’s hard for people in mixed marriage with mixed children to get it. Mangan doesn’t even want to try. (That’s why the Austers love people like him.) The reality is Mangan is still a long way from reaching behind his head and scratching the back of his neck, grimacing and saying to himself, “Shit, I never really saw it like that. I never meant to help replace my race. Look, you can’t ask me to hate my own kids, but the fact is… I screwed up.” Far from it. There he is recommending that a “possible solution” for white men being unable to find white woman to marry is to marry Asians. Does not get it. And yet he has a long post permanently displayed on his front page explaining his “racial consciousness.” (His reply was a feeble attempt at sarcasm about having lost his “racialist street-cred.” Good one!) But if you want people like him on board—and why shouldn’t you?—then he needs to have it explained to him. Then he can do whatever he will, but at least he won’t be acting in ignorance. Then you’ll actually find out what he’s made of. 30
Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:26 | # Another Inmdependent article on the BNP’s electoral prospects, this time by the hard-leftist Mark Seddon. Not many comments, but again the BNP supporters rule the thread. The left seems to have no idea at all how to respond, and largely absents itself. 31
Posted by Bill on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:52 | # Make of this what you will. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1158981/Labour-waged-war-sense-Britishness-say-Tories.html 32
Posted by Bill on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:03 | # I should have added this to above - no matter. Could it be ? Wishful thinking. Double whammy in one day!. 33
Posted by Dasein on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:51 | #
He’s offering one half of a false dichotomy: either racial aliens are to be allowed or encouraged to remain separate (multiculturalism), or they are to become integrated (mongrelized with the British).
The only thing perverse was the ranking. The mongrelized Brit will become the new ideal. People like this are more dangerous than the far-left loons because they give people a racially destructive outlet for their justified anger. This is why we need to rescue people who are in danger of becoming neocons (for example, by stuffing neocon books in libraries and bookstores with leaflets leading them to sites like MR, or posting in mainstream conservative forums, as many here do). 34
Posted by Bill on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:55 | # At a BNP fund raising event in Batley Yorshire on Sunday, Chairman Nick Griffin said during his speech that the liberal elite are conducting a campaign based on a super race theory. British whites especially, the English, had become the new Jews. http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/bnptv-report-from-sunday’s-battle-for-britain-roadshow/ Warning - the video stubbornly refuses to continue beyond the 7 min mark. Maybe you’ll have better luck. 35
Posted by Bill on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:59 | # Sorry! above. British whites, especially the English, had become the new Jews. 36
Posted by Glyn Roach on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:09 | # This is a similar view from this website. http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2009/01/lebensraum-and-improving-racial-stock.html 37
Posted by Re:Glyn Roach on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:34 | # That’s a good post Glyn Roach, but the Nazi-esque rhetoric in it should be toned down lest pro-White activists continue to be compared to or smeared as Nazis who are, according to the Jewish owned mass media and Jew-infested academia, The Height of All Evil (TM). 38
Posted by Re:Bill on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:38 | #
Quite true - the UK, especially England, is a Jew-infested country through and through - read: http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/the_afghan_church/#c70632 - though resistance to the Anglo-Jewish establishment is still somewhat strong amongst some Scottish and Irish folk. 39
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:44 | # Glyn, That is the unedited draft of David Hamilton’s article which we published - properly scripted - on 19th October last year. Green Arrow helped David technically with the set-up of his own blog-archive, and I guess the unedited versions of David’s pieces appear there as a consequence. Green Arrow is, shall we say, not a thinking man. Judging from his pathetic efforts to interpose himself as a mediator at the beginning of the EiE affair, notwithstanding the fact that he had zero credibility with the leadership clique, he appears to be terribly keen to lever himself into the BNP heirarchy. Frankly, keeness of that sort deserves to fail. 40
Posted by Glyn Roach on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:38 | # I apologise for my mistake. These articles get copied and pasted exverywhere and I posted the wrong one. Sorry. 41
Posted by Bill on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:47 | # Auster says…. “However, when I contemplate today’s systematic campaign, organized and backed by all the ruling powers of society, to put down, demonize, disempower, and marginalize the white race, I think it is shaping up as the greatest crime in the history of mankind.” 5 March 2008 02.27pm Post a comment:
Next entry: Strange bedfellows - Protests against the Durban II conference
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:20. (View) weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:24. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:54. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:12. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:44. (View) |
Posted by Bill on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:48 | #
BNP notching up a gear or 3.
Thanks to BNP poster.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KTZro4QlAY