So the political threads of the Daily Telegraph are to be available on a restricted basis to non-subscribers to the print or on-line edition. Whether that basis will be generous enough to preserve the site’s utility for us (that is, as a site where we can offer nationalist analyses without the deadening influence of pre-moderation) remains to be seen. Regular readers of the DT on-line will be well aware that the journalistic output suffers from Red Bus Syndrome. Whenever some event of interest occurs, half-a-dozen articles appear about it within an hour. A restriction to twenty articles a month will considerably hamper selection, and have a scattering effect on our collective presence.
A schwerpunkt is as virtuous in a war of discourse as it is in a war with guns and grenades. The huge progress that has been made over the last couple of years in liberalising speech on the DT threads is largely a product of the weight of nationalist sentiment, not of individual argumentation - excellent though much of that has been. Individuals are easily dealt with moderation-wise. It is when everybody is freed to speak inconvenient truths that the moderators’ battle is lost, and this has been the story at the DT.
One can always subscribe, of course, and then there are no restrictions to access. But what would be the point if the general readership plummets as it did at The Times:
Whether we can remain at the DT or we look for new journalistic soil to till, it is surely worthwhile maintaining the collective presence we have built up. I think that is possible. It may need a site secure from prying eyes as an organisational base. MR is a public medium. But at least we can have a discussion here and now about that and the other options that we have in our war for the freedom to state unambiguously that our people must live.
This comment appeared today on the thread to a Daily Telegraph leader pushing the usual Tory line on immigration. It was posted by theft_act1968. It is one of three comments this poster has fashioned touching on the same subject. He appears to be posting these comments serially.
I have no idea if he is alone in using the terms “The Runnymede Trials” and “The Runnymede Tribunal”, but I like them. They are good word-tools full of stout optimism and moral certainty. I think they could prove useful in roping in anti-Blair types to racial thinking. One of the other two comments is this, incidentally:
“Theft_act1968” is averaging ten recommends a comment, which is pretty good. I am going to start using the Runnymede references too. We’ll see how far this meme can be spread.
As the victims of the very successful Jewish/leftist seizure of the terms of racial debate all across the West, it behoves us to have some respect for this form of warfare. Rhetorical tools come in two forms: those that condition the moral tenor (“racist”, “anti-Semite”, etc) and those that stipulate how to understand the world (“diversity is our strength”, “British-Asians”). Nullifying this toxic language requires more than a selective dismissal of the most commonly used terms. We have to put something in their place that speaks of our worldview, and we have to keep hammering it home. Speaking of which ... Bob Whittaker’s mantra, “Anti-racism is anti-white racism”, has been around long-enough for us to assess its effectiveness. The term “anti-white racist” was used prior to it, of course. But the left on both sides of the pond has heard it. As one would expect, it is dismissive. But its capacity to apply the “racist” term does seem to have been restricted. There has been a blow struck.
The left has also caught on that we are speaking increasingly of a white genocide, and again it is dismissive (for reasons we all understand). The term “race-replacement”, however, is more difficult to reject because of the clear statistical evidence in the public domain. As far as I am concerned, the author of this rhetorical tool was our friend Fred Scrooby. I am only aware of Frank Salter using the term before Fred did, and then not in a rhetorical sense. If MR achieves nothing else, at least we have, through Fred, launched into the world one valuable word-tool.
I think we are missing several tricks in fashioning such word-tools, principally through our intellectually incoherent and casual approach. We need to think much more systematically about how we were out-manoeuvred in the past and about the positives of our worldview. We need to return to the two forms of moral and perceptual tools and work out more precisely what we need to effect a mechanical shift in the way our people think - if we possibly can, given the very tenuous hold we have on public discourse.
Of course, tenuous hold notwithstanding, we are working with the grain. It is easier for us to achieve results than it was for our foes.
I wouldn’t be normally posting here at this time, but something needing the immediate attention of sincere patriots, activists, nationalists, etc. has come up, and it’s an excellent documentation of who the enemy really is.
The prothink network comprises of a group of websites dedicated to documenting the activities of, opposing and fighting our common enemy, a 4-letter word beginning with J. The people behind the prothink network are mostly young and passionate individuals, not necessarily correct on all counts, but sincere and activist, which is what matters as their heart’s in the right place and they’re doing something constructive.
The J-enemy has targeted goddady, their registrar and web host, which caved in and has given them 2 days to find another domain registrar and host [#1, #2]. Now, these individuals are advised to separate their domain registrars from web hosts, and it’s plural so that they spread out their domains and websites across different service providers.
The prothink network comprises of websites such as prothink.org, zioncrimefactory.com, prothink.tv, jewishproblem.com, 911missinglinks.com, etc. That their work is noteworthy can be ascertained from 911missinglinks.com receiving accolades from ADL’s honcho, Abe, and zioncrimefactory having had blog after blog deleted by google and wordpress. Michael Delaney, the mastermind behind 911missinglinks.com, has tirelessly campaigned, on the streets and online, to educate Americans about who really orchestrated 9/11.
Extend these fine individuals your support, which can be in the form of donations, moral support, mirroring their content, giving their case studies publicity on your blogs, offering them hosting space in the event you own a server, etc. Be advised that I have no affiliation with the prothink network.
In the event that the prothink network is down, which it most probably will be for some time, you may contact some of the key individuals [remove brackets]:
[prothink] [@] [yahoo.com]
[zioncrimefactory] [@] [hotmail.com]
The address to which paypal donations should be sent:
[mikedelaney6575] [@] [gmail.com]
Had the prothink network targeted Arabs, Nazis, Blacks, Muslims, Latinos, liberals, conservatives, feminists, or other assorted groups aside from the J-enemy, rest assured they’d not only be left unmolested, but encouraged. If the prothink network used superficial criticism of the J-enemy as cover for J-excusing and disinformation, like the typical website in the nationalist genre, they’d be left alone. But they’re the real deal. Accordingly, it isn’t difficult to determine who the enemy really is. Act against this enemy by supporting those fighting them.
by Leon Haller
A purpose of sites like MR is, or ought to be, the sharing of practical strategies to advance white EGI. Methods of dispute resolution in a White Republic, the ‘unencumbered self’ and its relation to race-liberalism or postmodernity, the existence of God, etc, are all interesting matters. But discussing them hardly directly aids our cause.
Our primary task remains, as ever over the last half-century, mass racial awakening. Too few of our racial kinsmen are even aware that an intellectually respectable (or indeed any respectable) movement in opposition to white extinction exists and is growing. We must let them know we are out there - and each of us must do so again and again and again ...
Repetition of one’s core message is the heart of mass ideological change.
I started writing a comment on a Yahoo board earlier today (I have posted thousands of pro-white comments in mainstream places over the past dozen years), and ended up producing something longer than I had anticipated. My comment, which responded to an article on current political divisiveness, is hardly ideal (esp insofar as it was written quickly and ‘straight’, with no reflection), but re-reading it it seemed adequate for Americans to use to further the awakening process. Of course, I welcome the suggestions of others (perhaps MR could eventually have a file of repeatable comments for mass distribution depending on the article types at issue - American, UK, continental Europe, crime, general race, race science, immigration, etc). The point is for people to be ‘proselytizing’ to the very maximum extent. I don’t wish to belittle the discussions at MR or similar sites, but isn’t the ultimate purpose of those discussions to change the real world?
Do we hear governments, the mass media, and academia calling for Japan to bring in millions of non-Japanese people and assimilate with them because they’re “not diverse enough”?
No one says “Japan” needs to become a “Melting Pot”.
No one says China, Africa, Mexico, Haiti, or Israel should be deluged with massive random, foreign populations to demonstrate how “moral” they are, or to “enrich” their sorely lacking culture.
Anti-Whites say there should be no White Countries ✓
by Graham Lister
If there was no difference between essence and appearance, there would be no need for science. - Karl Marx.
- from “Karl Marx’s Theory of History – A Defence” by G.A. Cohen.
Let the discussion on ‘top-down versus bottom-up’ processes in the world of ideas and ideology begin.
Note- the act of quotation does not imply approval or agreement.
It’s been said that the halls of academia echo with the chorus of freedom of speech, but the most vociferous members of this chorus often do everything within their power to suppress it! I know of no better example than this of the uselessness of explicitly endorsing support for free speech; behavior, not what one superficially endorses, matters.
Assuming one’s inclined toward respecting freedom of speech, how does one accommodate those hostile to free speech? Suppressing the hostiles is a form of suppression of free speech, but one must suppress the hostiles in order to freely discuss the things the hostiles want suppressed. An open discussion can’t be productive if the hostiles barge in with obfuscation, lies, distortions, noise, nonsense, straw men, trolling, guilt-by-association arguments, discrediting the opponent by making assumptions and then critiquing the assumptions, exposing false information by fellow-hostiles, false dichotomies, deflecting attention from the perpetrators, directing animosity toward the victims and other foul techniques.
Getting rid of the hostiles is an easy matter if the discussion is taking place among a non-proselytising group. The hostiles can complain all they want about suppression of free speech, but the group can keep them out without explanation and without apology.
But the solution to having a productive discussion with hostiles lurking about isn’t easy when the discussion group seeks to bring naive individuals and fence sitters into the fold. Let’s look at a specific issue, the discussion of who did 9/11.
Black March 2012 is a campaign to avoid purchasing movies, music, books and video games during March 2012. It’s in responsive to continual attempts by malicious individuals to control the dissemination of information under the guise of anti-piracy measures (SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, Trans-Pacific Partnership, etc.) or child protection (PCIPA). Spread the word. And don’t defeat the measure by buying excessively in February to carry yourself through March. Seek alternatives to occupy your time with: a new exercise program, more outdoor time with your children, browsing the internet, learning a musical instrument, learning a new language, etc.
A recent discussion of problems with Apple using humans as machines to build iPhones, iPods and iPads prompted the argument that “A major problem in mounting a challenge to globalization is that it delivers the goods” and that it’s unlikely that people will give up their iPhones. The situation isn’t bleak. People can adopt a few strategies, as individuals, to lessen the problem.
The first is to buy smart phones, music players and hand-held computers from smaller manufacturers. Let’s say there are 10 companies, all using Chinese human labor to make such products. How does it benefit one to go with a smaller manufacturer?
This is how. Bankers love large companies making a lot of profit as advertising can make their products highly desirable, and the profits entice investors to buy the large company’s shares. Then it’s a matter of bringing down the company and raking in the loot... naive investors lose, bankers win. Now, if the consumer were to prevent any company from getting large by buying products from smaller manufacturers, bankers have less to gain by bringing down a small company here and there, and can only benefit by bringing down an entire industry or the stock market in general, which they can’t do very frequently or else investors will lose confidence in the stock market.
Notice that buying from smaller manufacturers may also cost less as there’s no premium paid for a top-notch brand name. Also note that the extras that come with some top-notch products aren’t worth the price. Would you rather pay a $200 premium for a smart phone with 1080p video playback capability when the screen size makes this functionality useless and the functionality is useful only if you connect it to a 1920 X 1080 monitor, in which case you might as well use any computer built in recent years to send 1080p video to the monitor, or upgrade the graphics card of an older computer for a lot less, or buy, for less, a blu-ray player capable of playing mkv, mov, divx, mp4 and other formats from a plugged-in USB drive?
The second strategy is do-it-yourself projects. The ARM-based computer board at the hear of smart phones and hand-held computers can be purchased separately. The open-hardware beagleboard and beaglebone, for instance, sell for $150 and $89, respectively, and offer 720p video playback and muscle for ordinary computing tasks equivalent to the first generation of iPad. Other alternatives, some even cheaper, comprise of the leopardboard, craneboard, pandora, etc.
Now, it may be a hassle for some to separately buy a capacitive touch screen, cables, etc., and find a suitable enclosure for the computer board, but there are some people who’ve already done the job, like the Grégoire Gentil group at always innovating, who offer a ready-made smart book based on open-hardware, and they even offer, for free, a multi-boot system allowing one to switch between four open-source operating systems, depending on whether one wishes to use the unit as a smart phone or as a general purpose computer.
To use the unit as a phone, you can use voice-over-IP (VOIP) technologies such as skype (avoid google talk). To get cell phone functionality, you’re better off obtaining a barebones cellphone, which service providers will usually throw-in for free, using things along the lines of Grégoire Gentil’s products for your other smart phone and hand-held computer needs. Or maybe solutions comprising of a dongle that will let you use your unit with cell phone networks already exist.
Aside from these individual steps, there’s always organizing in specific ways to target the bankers.
Earlier today I came across this video at BDF posted by Chuffer, a good, reliable nationalist and ex-BNP member, and a regular participant in the BDF bear-pit. The theme of injustice and betrayal is not new to us, of course, though it is certainly a pleasure to see it so well structured. But the street interview section is important, and especially refreshing to see. There are the authentic voices of the English working-class who have been been subjected to eighteen years of relentless Lawrence propaganda. And they know it.
Still, one wonders why they exhibit such a resigned attitude, and not more fight. Then one remembers how deserted these people are. Not the politicians, not the press, not the Church, not the schools, not the law ... no part of civil society spares them a word of acknowledgement. It truly is the most complete betrayal imaginable. And yet, as this video shows, the Lawrence propaganda almost certainly now exercises more influence over the minds of the traitors than it does the betrayed.
Readers who have followed or been involved in the recent travails of British nationalism will know that, while the “parallel party structure” appears to be moving forward within the BNP, there are indications that the jump to a new party is not far away:
Such a move, of course, is high in risk. Here’s someone for whom I have a lot of time explaining why to readers of British Democracy Forum:
Many should know that wikileaks is a 100% kosher undertaking. The leaks comprise of data that are easily falsified in part. The leaks embarrass America or Arabs, not Israel. The leaks are about relatively trivial matters but never serious issues such as central banks being private banks, not government banks. The “whistleblowers” don’t just maintain official versions of major events such as 9/11 but ridicule dissent as nonsense that detracts from the “serious work” they’re doing with their exposes! The U.S. ICE (Israeli Content Enforcement) agency of the Department of Homeland Security, which seizes domains willy nilly for copyright infringement, hasn’t bothered with wikileaks. And so on…
Some crucial leaks were said to have been provided by Private Bradley Manning to Julian Assange. Both men look effeminate, and one would think they’re homos, which makes for bad PR. So they put on a show where Assange was accused of raping two Swedish women, making him appear a macho man, and used the ruckus to attract attention to wiki leaks. All this would be amusing if it weren’t for the plight of Bradley Manning, who’s been imprisoned in solitary confinement, cut off from friends and family. Long-term incarceration in such circumstances is designed to break people down and make them confess to anything you want them to.
Manning’s trial is currently under way by Americans even though he is British, and there isn’t much that can be done to prevent him from being convicted of bogus charges, but you can help expose the sham to others and make it embarrassing for those working for the Israelis behind the wikileaks scam to be who they are.
The larger a commercial bank, the greater the shrinkage of the money supply it can singlehandedly cause by loaning less. This is the reason why bankers prefer fewer [and thereby larger] commercial banks and there’s a long-term trend of bank mergers. You can do your part to slow down the bankers and counter the trend by closing your accounts at large banks, using credit unions or small/community banks instead. Use this resource for more information, including how to motivate others to move away from big banks: http://www.newbottomline.com/move_our_money
Dams and the hydroelectric power stations that accompany them are being destroyed under phony environmental concerns.
The process in part achieves rural depopulation and increases the cost of rural habitation so that only the rich can live beyond the cities and suburbs: http://prfamerica.org/1998/LandForDams.html
More: http://morphcity.com/home/107-dam-liars-crooks-and-killers [be cautious with the rest of the website]
The uninhabited land will increasingly end up in the hands of bankers as governments owe them staggering amounts of debt that can’t be paid off as the bankers create debts out of nothing and the only money created by governments comprises of coins.
Cutting off a convenient source of electricity is another useful goal for the bankers as they can more easily disrupt the supply of fossil fuels used for generating electricity in a region, raising the cost of electricity or bringing the inhabitants to a grind if they protest too much against the banking system.
Follow the suggestions of prfamerica.org for property rights activism, and also target the money masters: http://www.majorityrights.com/money#implementation
The money people [bankers] aren’t content with just control of money and possession of most wealth in their hands, but they want to take away people’s ability to bypass their system in any way. So they’ve also been attacking the ability of individuals to grow food in one’s yard or land. A good discussion is here:
If the money masters get their way, what will happen? Easier mass starvation deaths, like the Holodomor, in regions with too many troublesome protesters against the system.
Learn, get wiser and pass it around.
Does anyone know if a concerted effort is being mounted to plant Bob’s mantra across the MSM? I happened to encounter a lot of it on this Telegraph thread about the short-lived racial segregation at Bjerke Upper Secondary School in Oslo. Then at BDF I came across this quite powerful video, which is the work of a mantra-phile.
Anyone know anything about this?
And here’s another one:
Quite a few references to “the professional” Bob Whittaker, which I found superfluous but a target audience might not, I suppose.
Alexander has launched an e-petition on the Downing Street website proposing the end of the private fractional reserve system:
This constitutes an attack, in Britain at last, on the third great pillar of globalisation - the enslavement in debt of all the European peoples. I hope you think it is worth disseminating knowledge of the petition wherever appropriate and worth signing yourself, of course.
The money issue, specifically how it’s created and who controls its supply, is arguably the most important of all issues discussed at or relevant to MR. Tired of malicious individuals spreading disinformation on money and banking, I finally posted a Money FAQ. This should’ve been here from Day 1, but better late than never.
Preservation, survival; quality of life
Some of the discussion here’s been about preservation and survival. But survival can occur in a coma, and an endangered species can be preserved in a cage-like setting. Quality of living goes beyond mere survival or propagation, and money’s central to it for most practical purposes.
Higher order aspects of living such as the pursuit of special knowledge, philosophy, non-work-related attempts to improve ourselves on our own initiative, the indulgence of passions, etc., require financial stability, discretionary income and spare time. But people in Western nations are increasingly drowning in debt and face a not-too-distant future where the majority of us live in poverty, like most people in the Third World. The overwhelming, singular cause for this is that our money’s created, as debt [out of nothing], by bankers, and it’s these bankers who’re in control of the money supply, which they manipulate to their advantage.
Like many Jewish websites and publications, JewishFederations.org is packed with examples of how Jews in America network and collaborate in their own ethnic interests. There are entries here on women’s philanthropy, youth leadership, planned giving and endowments, lobbying in Washington, and a page of wider resources that leave no Jewish stone unturned. European nationalists would do well to emulate one tenth of this industry. Actually, beyond a few failing micro-parties, we in Britain have really nothing.
Over the last few days I’ve had some conversations with certain British nationalists - real ones, that is, enthno-nationalists - about this question:
If a political party standing in isolation as the nationalist vehicle will always struggle to tip the balance and actually win in a multiracial democracy, what additional vehicles/measures do you think the wider movement could bring forward to make the political win more possible?
I am thinking here about media and PR, cultural organisations, think tanks, fund-sourcing agencies ... all and anything that might advance the cause of our ethnic interests. My conversations have been quite interesting, but this is such a rich area to consider I’m sure there must be many more strong suggestions that can be made - and some that will have been thought through pretty carefully.
I should add that this is not a purely speculative question. With the BNP leadership election concluded and the party, to all intents and purposes, locked up and bound to decline over the next four years - if it lasts that long - this is the moment when people are looking for fresh thinking. That much is clear. Perhaps we will even thank Nick Griffin for inadvertently forcing the development of an holistic and multi-faceted approach to the problem of the public mind, public discourse, and only then, the ballot box.
Strategies for White Advocacy
Never accept the defamatory phrase “non-Hispanic White.” White men must never be defined by what they are not, especially not in their own White nations. Never pass up an opportunity to publicly hoist an anti-White activist by his own petard by vociferously condemning the use of any White racial slurs. The time of White tolerance of petty racial attacks is over. Whites must strategically take advantage of the emotional minefield that racial taboos present.
Excoriate and humiliate any anti-White, especially one who is not White, foolish enough to make reference to “crackers,” “rednecks,” “honkies,” “White bread,” “White boys,” “White trash” (Jay Leno does this routinely) or any other term demeaning to White men or women. Not only will this tactic instantly drain the credibility of the anti-White person, it will energize and inspire any observing Whites in the crowd to do the same thing in future opportunities. It is extremely rare to find a White man fighting back against attacks on the White race, so seize every opportunity to demonstrate that it can be done from a position of strength and that it carries moral weight.
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White: never shy from the slander of being called ‘racist’
One of the strongest rhetorical weapons of the enemy is the word ‘racist.’ The good news is that all of its strength will disappear if the public no longer takes it seriously and realizes that it is a thinly-veiled attempt to silence White advocacy. James Edwards’ Racism Schmacism provides all the ammunition you need on this one. For decades, pro-White politicians and activists have shrunk back in horror whenever they hear the word. Destroy the credibility of the word ‘racist’ by confronting it directly and without fear. There are two options: point out that the accuser is using the modern-day equivalent of the word ‘heretic’ or simply explain that the word is only used to silence White people who are winning a debate. Shouting “heresy!” or “racist!” is an underhanded way to avoid difficult subjects, facts, or ideas. Using shaming language is an emotional appeal to crowd psychology that dodges any real analysis of the underlying arguments. Drain the potency of the word ‘racist’ to pave the way for public advocacy of White interests. Redirect the focus upon the accuser—“Anti-racism is just a code word for anti-White.”
Do not exhibit warning signs
Humans are heavily biased towards visual sensory input. Like it or not, a person’s appearance is a crucial causative variable in how ideas are received and evaluated. When a message is controversial or strains against the ruling dogma it is even more important for the spokesman to be aesthetically appealing. Those who are serious about raising White awareness and pointing out the hypocrisy of anti-White multiculturalism must be paragons of civility, not exemplars of barbarism.
Leave the swastikas at home. In a healthy White society, the swastika will be another symbol to study, admire, or criticize along with the rest of the ancient cultural symbols. Presently, America is not a healthy White society. Hence, the swastika is an instant deal-breaker for the overwhelming majority of the population. The demonization of the ancient Aryan symbol, which most racially-aware White scholars know predates Adolf Hitler’s particular manifestation by thousands of years, is indeed unfortunate, ignorant, and rather silly. But publicly reclaiming the history behind the swastika must be put aside to tackle far more important matters—the existence and continuity of the White race.
The case for a new discourse of genocide in our lands
by Christian Miller
The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake - this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national history. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.
Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon the traditionally White nations? Some say the traditionally White nations are economically advanced and therefore desirable destinations for immigration. This observation is mostly accurate. However, it does not explain the entire story because there are many other advanced nations that are traditionally non-White, yet face no pressure to absorb foreign populations.
Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world. It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline. There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce. The elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system. The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate. Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent. Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor. Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan. There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans. Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration. Japan is not the target. Japan is free to remain Japanese. It is only White nations that are targeted for genocide.
I’ve had a recurring vision for some time now, and I’m no longer certain as to whether it is a dream or a fantasy. I only know that I cannot forget it. In this vision, we have won. Victory is complete and total, our own land for our own people. The tribe, our tribe, is free to breathe with deep lungs. There are pretty girls to be admired, songs to be sung. Our songs, the way only we can sing them. Great vistas open up before us, and there is the inescapable feeling that thousands of years have somehow been won. The past, present, and future, the call of the stars. The magnitude of it all is, quite simply, staggering.
Yet, in this vision, I am drawn away from the joy, in fact I don’t feel it at all, at least not for long. No, that’s not right. Not at all. There is a task at hand, something that has been weighing upon me for a long time, no longer to be ignored. There is a grave to visit, a grave from another world. A world now mercifully dead and buried, but a world that still leaves its stain, its mark. Channon and Christopher’s graves.
I go to the grave site, but what can be said? Do I not fancy myself as something of an orator? Yet, in this vision, words fail me, they tire me, they embarrass me. They seem so utterly ridiculous and patronizing, and most anything that I could say would be a preposterous lie, dishonoring me and them. Yet I know what has to be said, that and nothing else. The words are inescapable, they force themselves upon me. “We came too late.” That’s it, but now again. “We came too late.”
Those words, those four words, are the only ones spoken in this dream of mine. I find that these four words impose themselves upon me, one way or another, all too often these days.
I look at my nephews and nieces, and I can’t help but smile. Really great kids, I think the world of them. It’s not too far from the truth to say that they worship me; I’m by far their favorite uncle. I think they feel about me the same way that, in my own childhood, I felt about an older cousin. He was a God walking on earth, a hero among mere mortals, as far as I was concerned.
Yet, what does the future hold? These children will be, in fact already are, subjected to daily assault by our most dedicated enemies. One niece in particular, not even three, is the Nordic archetype. A truly beautiful child, striking to strangers. I know that every effort will be made to separate her from her people, to make her despise them, or at least instill indifference. A mere ten or so years from now, she could be gyrating to the most noxious Negro music, her head filled with the most repugnant thoughts. This child, and millions more like her, innocent and by all rights entitled to a sane world governed by her own people, stands as sheep ready for the slaughter. Is it my fate to become the weird uncle, the crank, the strange symbol of a dying people that the young can only look at with derision and wonder? Is that it? Is that where this is heading?
I feel something similar whenever I see young white children these days. Can we win in time? Without thinking, I do the simple math, it’s automatic now.
“O.K., let’s see, this child has about ten years left before being thrown to the wolves. Can we win by then? Will we be too late?”
The bottom line is that we are running out of time. The body count keeps growing, the river of blood continues to rise but is never sated. Our people are being destroyed in countless ways, great and small. For how many more victims, for how many more families, must we say, “We came too late?”
I have made no secret of my conviction that, in order to win, the cultural ground must be prepared first. Until street activists start reporting real success and a true resonance with our message, we will know that we must do better. Ultimately, that’s the proof that we need, the only proof that matters. It is our job to do what we can to develop appealing, winning white nationalist ideas, and spread them to the best of our ability.
We must develop ideas that are capable of challenging the status quo and existing norms, and we must do it soon. To that end, I propose a project, namely one post a week for fifty weeks. Each post will cover a distinct topic, each building upon the last. The “50” should, to the extent practicable, be comprehensive, dealing with everything from ontology to economics, from first principles to strategy and tactics, from evolutionary psychology to political systems. I realize that is a lot for 50 topics, which is why the single most important part of this project is at the beginning, coming up with the “50” questions or propositions. Then, unleash the carnivores of majorityrights, hammer it out, and move on to the next topic in the following week.
I realize the limitations of handling things this way, and it will only work with meaningful collaboration. But we’ve got to impose some sort of structure on ourselves, and some type of time limit. This project, by its nature, imposes both. I am not proposing “philosophy by committee,” though it might seem that way at first. Whoever hosts this will, ultimately, have to make the final call. Personally, I believe that others may be better suited for this task than I. Certainly guessedworker and Greg Johnson come to mind, just for starters. I understand that Haller is working on something, so maybe he would be interested. However, I am willing to do it.
The first task is to come up with the comprehensive “50.” If there is interest in this project, please submit any ideas for the list on this thread. Feel free to offer just one, or your entire list of 50. The more the merrier. If I’m doing this, I will synthesize the suggestions, and come up with the final 50. Again, the idea is that the 50 topics should provide a comprehensive overview of who we are, where we are going, and ultimately how to get there. We’ve only got 50, so we’ve got to make them count. I’m stronger in some areas than others, so if the list were left entirely to me, I think some important areas will find themselves neglected. I hope to avoid that.
Let’s do this, for all that have come before us and for generations yet unborn. Let us at least try, for even if we fail in this particular task, it will only free us up for another approach. We will not quit.
For many victims of the butcher, we will never escape the stain of “We came too late.” What’s done, most tragically, has been done. Our losses, while already grievous, compare as nothing to the good that we may accomplish. Just as our past stretches back into the primordial mists of time, so too may future generations of our tribe journey into worlds distant and far. It is up to us to see that they will have an existence at all.
So much is at stake here and, though we did not choose it to be so, all signs point to our fate largely being determined in the years ahead. Like it or not, it’s our fight. Perhaps we are, or can be, what the Germans once called a “community of fate.” Let’s make the most of it, for the good of the tribe.
For Victory In Our Time,
Liberal: Humans are all brothers under the skin. After all, based on gene variations, one race differs from another less than individuals differ from each other. We all share over 99% of the same DNA. Race is just a social construct buttressed by racist social mores.
WN: Men and women differ only by one chromosome, or in other words share 99.99999999999999999…% of the same DNA. Does this mean that the biological differences (including the fact that women can have babies and men can’t) between the sexes are just a social construct bolstered by sexist social mores?
Can anyone suggest a way to improve that answer? (Yes, I know there are better scientific counter-arguments, but I’m talking about something that can get the point across to laymen).
[Update: Thanks for the comments pointing out the number of genes on the Y chromosome. ‘Share 99.99999999999999999…% of the same DNA’ is obviously untrue. Aren’t most of these Y chromosome genes determining differences between men though (so the number of genes determining men vs. women is still quite small)?]
So we have all got well and truly used to the idea that the left is out of office after thirteen long, hard years. The political class generally has lost the trust of the people, and will not easily win it back. In Europe the post-national project is in trouble. The internal inconsistencies of the single currency seem set to tear the Union in two. Power, it seems to me, is more fluid than it has been for twenty years at least.
Yet at the very moment that political nationalism in England should be rising irresistibly on the back of this and of its European Parliament success of a year ago, it is mired in self-doubt and introspection. The Labour Party, shamed and defeated on Election Night though it was, out-thought and out-classed it in Stoke and Barking, and the usual squeeze on minor parties did the rest elsewhere. The same old questions return again and again about the leadership, about the calibre of senior activists, about finances. There is an inescapable feeling that the BNP has a narrow performance corridor in which it will, from here on, oscillate electorally, but from which it will never escape. It is not going to shake the ground. It is not going to destroy the Establishment.
The Establishment, meanwhile, may be tempted into returning to the legal fray to destroy it:
Like many, I’m sure, I was much taken with Hervé Ryssen’s piece titled The psychopathology of Judaism, translated by John de Nugent and published this month at the reinvigorated TOQ. It contained the clearest identification I have ever seen of what it is to be Jewish with the dissolution of the world’s distinct peoples. But it also contained some killer quotes, one of which was this, from Yitzhak Attia, director of French-language seminars at the Yad Vashem Holocaust institute in Tel Aviv, writing in Israel magazine:
Quotes of this kind are valuable debating tools, and there are hundreds of them lying around - mostly on our respective hard drives. So I thought I would create a thread which would enable anyone interested to share similarly precious finds and perhaps build up a useful resource.
Be my guest.
White Genocide Project
Also see trash folder.
Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.
Endorsement not implied.
Nationalist Political Parties
Whites in Africa