Posted by Boris on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:38 | #

The short answer to your question would be religion. Without the current array of present day religions, this situation would not have come about. At present the Old Testament(and the Koran) still justify extermination of one ethnicity in favor of another. Many old edicts from the Torah have been amended thru millenia, but not the one which explicity grants Jews the status of supremacy. For example, I believe a Rabbi has decreed the bastard mandate no longer applies for being unsually cruel, but the extermination of non-noahide goyim is not only justified but encouraged. No religious leader on the Christian side has come up with effective research as to nullify this threat against them, this seems highly illogical and gives some credance to some of Wongs rantings. Not only have Christians in this new era not tried to combat this constant threats towards them but, they’ve almost adopted a, if you can’t beat them join them type strategy.
The reason this politician changed has something to do with learning from experience what has transpired with politicians who disregarded Israel and its mandates. Want a present day example? See Randy Graf, and how(even though 80-90% of Americans want illegal immigration stoped) he’s on the verge of losing even though a strong anti-immigration platform alone should be enough to elect him in a landslide if sensible voters voting, not illegals. Randy Graf was stabbed in the back by his own Republican party which sent money to an open-border candidate who still lost to Graf. Now the back stage backstabbers are massing resources to get Graf opposition elected, and send out of office the few remaining sensible elected leaders we have such as Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo. I wonder if Vegas gives odds on politicians?

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:53 | #

“Children start off being colour-blind and this is a wonderful thing.  But if you have schools where the children are being educated in different ethnic groups you are going to lose that and you are simply not going to have integration.”

This is the biggest piece of rat-shit statement I have heard in my 67 years-White toddlers in a mixed-race pre-school senario,want NOTHING to do with their darker peers,once the penchant for violence becomes evident,and gravitate to their own-and let the niglets Mau-Mau with each other.Children are sometimes more cognizant than Liberal assholes that actually publish such crap.  BTW-Just what is “integration” supposed to achieve for the White race?Who really wants to know the benifits of child raping to cure AIDS,camel piss to get rid of head lice,eating menstrual blood from a cow to get a bigger set of testicals,poking your shit with a stick to see if Allah has been resurrected,forcibly excising the gentilia of minor female family members,eating the brains of a still-living monkey,or just every-day cannabalism so prevalent in Central Africa and Papua New Guinea.  While we are “welcoming"the Turd World, we are insuring our own demise.  Semper Fi!

Posted by R CROSS on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:28 | #

These traitors care not at all about the extinction of the rightfull inhabitants of these isles,all they are concerned with is the suppression of nationalism and common sense. If this animal invasion was beneficial to the indiginous population there would be no opposition,it is purely thier fascizm that gives rise to our instinctive need to preserve our nation and its values.But now with the recent comments by main stream politicians, the snowball is slowly begining to roll ,gathering pace and momentum as it is the true will of the people,who have had enough of the wonders of “diversity"and are finally being prodded into action, let us hope that the right can offer them a credible alternative.

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:09 | #

R CROSS,

Unfortunately, the right is also Lord Bruce Lockhart and the like.  The on-coming culturalisation of politics from the mid-1980’s was never picked up by the mainstream right, and they simply fell victim to it with scarcely a whimper.  Some, and perhaps the majority, are liberals anyway.  Others in what one might call the Tebbitt tendency - men such as John Townend and Gerald Howarth - have been beaten by the system in various ways.

So the right exists in two officially unrecognised (meaning disenfranchised) forms:

1) It lives in the opinions and instincts of the ordinary Englishman ... the native of this land.  We are not some ghastly kind of polyracial integrationists.  We are not infected with the desire to commit national suicide.  We just need our instinct for self-preservation to be clothed in political form.  We need honesty in public discourse.  We need courage from attractive and electable political leaders.  The rest we will do ourselves when we get the chance.

2) It lives in the diverse population of the fringes of right politics ... people like us, people who are sometimes Nature’s renegades, it’s true, but who are more often simply loyal and true but frustrated and sometimes angry members of the family of Englishmen.  Some of these are already engaged in the political world through the agency of the racial-nationalist BNP.  Some are messing around with UKIP because they haven’t yet thrown off the disease of liberalism.  Some are looking for other opportunities among like-discontented Tories.  Others are way out in the racialist badlands, trying to be heard.

The problem we have to solve is connecting (1) with (2), given the total effort expended by the Suicide Coalition in preventing same.

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:21 | #

Rusty: Conservatism seeks only to hold the old by resisting the current forces of social and political change.

That’s a very limited if also very American view of Conservatism.  I blogged about it here.

Recently, Bo took me to task in a private e-mail for using the word “Conservative” with too much affiliation to the cultural assumptions of my native land.  He was right, and I accept that, as in many instances, America and Britain are only separated by a common language, not joined by it.

Still, I have to speak about Britain and England as I find them, and beg the indulgence of American readers - who do not share all our political culture - to that end.

Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:24 | #

I have been listening to Tony Benn’s Diaries on BBC7 and in one episode Benn relates a private conversation with Tory Rightist, Keith Joseph (Jew and Fellow of All Souls) in which the old Leftie seems sympathetic to Joseph when the conservative cabinet minister remarks : “Of course, Enoch was right. We should never have let in all these immigrants without first clearing it with the British people”.

Posted by VanSpeyk on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:12 | #

He is wrong to say that children start out ‘color-blind’. It is a well-known fact that children, even as young as 4 or 5, can sort out different people by race.