Allodial vs UN Definition of Human Rights

Posted by James Bowery on Friday, 16 February 2007 18:26.

First of all, the law of the jungle—of Malthus—trumps everything else at some point so let’s get that out of the way.  What we’re doing in talking about Human Rights is setting up the rules of a game we play while our technologists yet have enough autonomy and let us treat Malthusian limits as “merely theoretic”.  At some point we may finally remove from technologists the autonomy and wealth necessary to push back the boundaries of Malthus but that day has not yet arrived in all its horror.

Secondly, something that is bringing that day of horror upon us faster all the time is the Nanny State theocracy—a religion favoring non-European minorities wherever Europeans are in the majority (and even where they are in the minority) thereby refusing to recognize the value of preserving the European culture that brought about technological civilization.  Indeed the theocracy hates it and is acting to destroy the European foundation of technological civilization by importing more r-strategic populations to replace population losses due to k-strategy among the creators.  So we may not have much longer to play the “human rights” game.  Malthus may get us soon.  That makes it urgent that “human rights” be redefined in such a way as to push back the Malthusian day of reckoning lest the entire game become moot.

So for contrasting analysis I’m including two alternative proposals for “A Universal Declaration of Human Rights”—one “allodial” and the other currently used by the UN to slowly destroy the territorial foundation of Europeans hence those that have demonstrated their historic capability to expand the limits to growth and delay the day of reckoning with Malthus.

Allodial Human Rights

Allodial Human Rights really boil down to one right:  A right to reservations of subsistence lands for people of like mind to live out their beliefs about what makes life good.  This implies the right of those people to exclude those of different mind just as it implies the right of any adult to choose to leave and join another people mutually consenting to accept him and, presumably, his children.  At the time of such a transfer, land rights go with him—his land rights are allodial or inalienable. 

The mechanism by which:

  • assortative migration occurs
  • boundaries shift and
  • transfers of land title are handled

become the primary purpose and province of “international” law.

Now, compare and contrast this conceptually simple and clear system of “human rights” to:

United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights

(other language versions)

Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948


On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted     and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of   which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the     Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the     Declaration and “to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and     expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions,    without distinction based on the political status of countries or     territories.”
PREAMBLE

    Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

    Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

    Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

    Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

    Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

    Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

    Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

 

Article 1.

 

    All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

    Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.  Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be       independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

    Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

   

    No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

    No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6.

    Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

    All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law.  All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

     

Article 8.

    Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

    Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

    (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

    (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was           committed.

     

Article 12.

    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

    (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

    (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

     

Article 14.

    (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

    (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15.

    (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.

    (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

    (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

    (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

    (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection           by society and the State.

     

Article 17.

    (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

    (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

    (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

     

    (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21.

    (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

    (2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.

    (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22.

    Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

    (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

    (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

    (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

    (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

     

Article 24.

    Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25.

    (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

    (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance.  All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

     

Article 26.

    (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the           basis of merit.

    (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding,      tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

    (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

    (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

    (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28.

    Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

    (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

    (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

    (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

    Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.


Tags:



Comments:


1

Posted by a Finn on Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:30 | #

Dear readers, I intervene here and answer two texts from history. These comments are from “We can add Finland to the list”. I was away for a while and had several tasks to do, so the answer comes now.   

“I think I prefer the state to administer modest fines against incitement to violence rather than administer drugs to change people’s behaviour. The latter is a truly chilling idea. ....”

Posted by karlmagnus on Monday, January 15, 2007 at 03:38 AM

- Well, here is a warming thought for you. The state already deals medicines to people, who have mental problems, if they accept it. It would be appropiate to suggest therapy and/or medicines to people, who clearly have mental problems. They may or may not accept it. With this method many mentally unstable persons, who will never by themselves seek help, would receive help.

“Hey Finn is your spoken english good enough to be interviewed by MR’s radio host ? I’d like to know more about Finland, the politics, the people, the immigrants, the media,
the schools.”

Posted by JB on Monday, January 15, 2007 at 06:11 AM

I make a countersuggestion. What if I write something. It would be more useful for you if I wrote about two or three issues; Differences in thinking between Europe’s and North-America’s nationalists; Ethnic in-groups and ethnic competition. The first can be done sooner and the latter much later because it is a large issue and I have to do it in
Finnish first. Most of the Finnish situation is the same than in many other European countries except less severe, but going in the wrong direction. It would be useful for you to know some Finnish peculiarities. This would be the third issue, but it can be also connected to the first. The next month I dedicate to upcoming parliament elections in Finland (18.3). We have many good candidates, e.g. very popular Jussi Halla-aho, Phd
in linguistics in Helsinki and Teemu Lahtinen, Chairman of Suomen Sisu (a Finnish nationalist citizen’s organisation) in Uusimaa province. I can send you three texts from Halla-aho (He has 109 in Finnish), which have been translated to English. They describe fairly well some of the democratic political immigration restriction etc. talks going on in Finland. Naturally they are more moderate than politics inside different nationalist citizens’ organisations. You can freely publish them if they meet your standards, but you must mention the author and provide a link to his pages.

Here are some links:

Halla-aho’s writings and other things:

http://www.halla-aho.com/scripta/

Halla-aho himself and his election -pages:

http://www.halla-aho.com/jussi/vaalit/

Teemu Lahtinen’s pages:

The text above mr. Lahtinen; Finnish Finland in European Europe

http://www.teemulahtinen.fi/

Halla-aho’s ja Lahtinen’s election video:

The text; Is the multiculturalism and immigration too hot potato? Dare to think. Your representatives in Helsinki and Uusimaa…..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R30pNgxzf90&mode=related&search;=

Main page of Suomen Sisu:

http://www.suomensisu.org/

Suomen Sisu in English:

http://www.suomensisu.org/content/view/75/87/lang,en/

http://www.suomensisu.org/content/view/43/56/lang,en/


2

Posted by a Finn on Sat, 17 Feb 2007 06:10 | #

Small addition. I read the Suomen Sisu’s English version of declaration of principles. It needs improvement and it is quite far from the practical operations of Suomen Sisu. It does not give a clear real picture of Suomen Sisu. I am sorry about that.


3

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:51 | #

It seems to me, James, that post-Malthus the object will be to take-over the productive capacity of other people’s lands.  Such a strategy would have no referral point to rights of any kind, expect the right of the fittest to survive.  In preparation for that, then, your “alloidalism” would be but a stepping stone along the way, itself proving too restrictive in the self-same moment that the Malthusian shoe drops.


4

Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:31 | #

I would prefer an environment in which we are expanding into tremendously greater ecological ranges while keeping for informations sake those with whom we otherwise would enter into a Malthusian conflict.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Frontierist News Roundup 20070217 Audiocast
Previous entry: Garland of the Telegraph.  Cartoonist.  Coward.

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:48. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 12:19. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 04:15. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:57. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:40. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 01 Nov 2024 23:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:21. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Mon, 28 Oct 2024 23:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:28. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:27. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:37. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:54. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:23. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:19. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:59. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:28. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Sat, 12 Oct 2024 23:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Doing the Basic Math For Net Asset Tax As Proposed by Bowery In 1992' on Fri, 11 Oct 2024 00:50. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Doing the Basic Math For Net Asset Tax As Proposed by Bowery In 1992' on Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:52. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Doing the Basic Math For Net Asset Tax As Proposed by Bowery In 1992' on Mon, 07 Oct 2024 22:28. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Doing the Basic Math For Net Asset Tax As Proposed by Bowery In 1992' on Sun, 29 Sep 2024 23:57. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Reich and Rangel reveal the new anti-white, anti-middle-class agenda' on Sun, 29 Sep 2024 11:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Sun, 29 Sep 2024 11:11. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Sun, 29 Sep 2024 05:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Reich and Rangel reveal the new anti-white, anti-middle-class agenda' on Sun, 29 Sep 2024 05:28. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Sun, 29 Sep 2024 05:24. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Sat, 28 Sep 2024 11:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Reich and Rangel reveal the new anti-white, anti-middle-class agenda' on Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:26. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Reich and Rangel reveal the new anti-white, anti-middle-class agenda' on Wed, 25 Sep 2024 14:49. (View)

affection-tone