Posted by Wandrin on Tue, 02 Nov 2010 02:44 | #

This is a very critical issue for them as if the truth comes out it shows they’ve been lying for 50 years.

The multicult ideology is psychological warfare to prevent any kind of defense against displacement but creating and then covering up non-white violent crime is the actual physical mechanism being used to bring about the ethnic cleansing of western cities.

That’s how all those American cities became 80% non-white and why London, Paris, Berlin, Rome etc are all going the same way.

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:16 | #

This is totally irrelevant to your post, but very interesting nonetheless:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/sarah-palin-campaigning-israel_513477.html

Takes two seconds to digest.

Amazing how easily whites get suckered then coopted.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:37 | #

Meanwhile, back at the Telegraph it’s time to bite those globalist nails again:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/maryriddell/8103068/The-coming-housing-crisis-is-bad-news-for-everyone-but-the-far-Right.html

Posted by Joe of the Mountain on Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:58 | #

Hmmm… thoughtcrime.  Doubleplus ungood on the televisor, mate.

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:30 | #

THEY ADMIT IT!

We need to start thinking about treason trials. They aren’t going to happen for a long while, but an internet movement “demanding heads”, even without legal authority, will at least discomfort our enemies.

_________________________________
Why the Democrats Will Win in California

Jon Wiener | November 1, 2010

When the votes are counted on Tuesday night in California, Democrats will easily sweep the top contests. Senator Barbara Boxer is likely to defeat challenger Carly Fiorina, 51-46 per cent (Nate Silver’s projection at 538.com), and last week’s California Field poll shows Democrat Jerry Brown ahead of Republican Meg Whitman in the gubernatorial race by 10 points.

Across the nation, the Republicans have a better-than-even chance of winning 50 seats held by Democrats – but none of those seats are in California.

Why are the Republicans doing so badly in California, when they are anticipating sweeping victories so many other places?

It’s not “the economy, stupid.” Yes, the rule in politics is that the unemployment rate is the most powerful predictor of incumbent approval ratings. But that’s not true in California, which has the third highest unemployment rate in the nation – officially 12.4 per cent (while the nation as a whole is at 9.2 per cent).

It’s not campaign funding. Yes, the rule in politics is that the candidate with the most money wins. But Whitman has spent $141 million on her campaign, outspending Brown four to one.

It’s not the candidates.  Yes, Whitman looks weak now. But just a month ago she was tied with Brown. And Boxer was considered “beatable” a few months ago, when her disapproval ratings were slightly higher than her approval ratings.

The best explanation: Democrats remain strong in California because “demography is destiny.” That’s what Harold Meyerson says – he writes a column for the op-ed pages of the Washington Post and the L.A. Times.

“The electorate in California is the least white of any state, except Hawaii,” Meyerson said in a recent interview. “That matters, because the Republicans have a genius for alienating voters of color.”

The Republican Party is increasingly a party of white people – and that, Meyerson says, “is death in California.” And although the Democrats in Congress have been, frankly, bad on immigration reform, the Republicans have been a lot worse: for them, “you’re a criminal suspect if you look Latino.”

The only Republican to win a top statewide office in California in the last 15 years is Arnold Schwarzenegger, and the only reason he won was that he didn’t have to run in a Republican primary – he won the recall vote against Democrat Grey Davis in 2003. Republican primaries compel Republican candidates to move to the right – and, Meyerson says, “to say things that are a disaster with the Latino community.”

California is exceptional also because the share of workers who are white and working class is much lower than the share in the Midwestern states, where the Democrats face big losses. While Obama has “a low cultural affinity with those voters,” Meyerson says, the way to reach them has been through an economic appeal – but there has not been enough in the Obama economic program to convince those voters that he is their economic champion.

In the past, unions made the case to their members that the Republicans would be worse – but in the private sector union membership is down to seven per cent of the work force, so the Democrats don’t have much to push back with. But in California, unions are stronger than most other states.

The big change began in the early 1990s, when aerospace collapsed in California. That led to a major out-migration of the white working class. At the same time there was a major in-migration of Latinos.

The result is that, in the last four years the Democrats have addded a million new voters in California, while the Repulicans have lost 200,000.  As of Sept. 3, the official count lists 44% of the state’s registered voters as Democrats, while only 31 per cent were Republicans. So the GOP will be celebrating in a lot of states on Tuesday night, but not in California.

Source URL: http://www.thenation.com/blog/155701/why-democrats-will-win-california

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:36 | #

BTW, the following statement is untrue:

“The electorate in California is the least white of any state, except Hawaii,” Meyerson said in a recent interview.

We are third, following first, Hawaii (which forward thinkers like, well, me, have long argued should be given independence, along with, less controversially, Puerto Rico, Guam, and “American” Samoa), and second, New Mexico.

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:46 | #

A comment to the TORONTO SUN:

The facts are very, very simple. White societies are better: for all people, but esp for whites. Forcing non-whites on ourselves, whether in the form of racial integration, or, worse, immigration, has everywhere been a disaster. If whites do not wake up soon, and re-embrace their historic, NORMAL, racial pride and nationalism, then our race and civilization will go extinct. Was “diversity” and “not being racist” worth that?

Oh, and the liberal traitors everywhere who imposed integration, immigration and multiculturalism on innocent white nations need to be identified, arrested, tried, convicted, and exterminated.

Posted by Notus Wind on Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:57 | #

Leon,

Thank you for pointing out that article, I will be sending it to family and friends post-haste.

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 03 Nov 2010 03:03 | #

Leon -

Oh, and the liberal traitors everywhere who imposed integration, immigration and multiculturalism on innocent white nations need to be identified, arrested, tried, convicted, and exterminated.

I’d love to say yes to that, but I think a more fitting fate would be lifetime exile to Zimbabwe, Congo or perhaps the slums of Calcutta. Where better for them to soak up the inumerable benfits of ‘diversity’.

Posted by Drifter on Wed, 03 Nov 2010 03:45 | #

Exile, especially voluntary migration, bypasses much of the human rights violation and atrocity stuff while achieving the essential permanent separation goal. Liberia is in some ways already a candidate destination with prior history serving as such.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:59 | #

Is that you, Angry Beard?  A bit strong on poor old Stephen Timms.  The man can’t help his height and physionomy.  His politics, yes.  But should he be butchered by a mad Moslem in a tent for that?  Have you converted and started living under Sharia, by any chance?

Posted by Angry Beard on Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:08 | #

Stephen Timms deserves to be chopped up in little pieces and fed to the piranhas, just like all of the other shits in parliament.
Frankenstein relies upon the paki vote for his cushy job, but when it came to career enhancement (ie waiting on Blair for a junior minister’s job), Timms shat all over the pakis and voted for the neo-con agenda.
On this issue my sympathy is with the pakis.

Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:47 | #

Is Angry Beard the same as Dirty Bull?

Posted by Wandrin on Fri, 05 Nov 2010 02:17 | #

Is Angry Beard the same as Dirty Bull?

No.

Posted by Jackson on Sun, 07 Nov 2010 05:03 | #

It’s interesting that pundits like those quoted above are always on about how the Republican Party is alienating aliens, but have missed the real story of this election, which is that the Democratic Party, as the party of Blacks, Jews, Homosexuals and Mexican invaders has finally and completely aliented whites.  So while multi-ethnic California may have rejected Republicans because of GOP baggage, the 65 house seats, 6 Senate seats, and dozen governorships in places like Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wyoming, Florida, Georgia, Virgina are a direct result of the Democrats racial pandering.

As more than a few commentators predicted the racial preferences, double standards, minority group give aways would all have a very different emotional feel when it was a black man delivering for his people than when it was an ‘enlightened’ liberal white doing the same thing.  It is much more blatently racial, and much more obvious and disturbing. 

Many whites bought into the “post racial” theme of Obama’s campaign in 2008.  But the reality has been the opposite:  Eric Holder refusing to prosecute obviously guilty Black Panthers, and testifying that whites are not protected by hate crime laws.  Obamas rush to judgement in the “beer summit” case.  Michelle’s ghetto fabulous life-style while millions of middle class whites are unemployed and underwater.

The media keeps repeating their tired old theme, but sadly for them, and the Democratic Party, it’s not 2050, it’s 2010.  The voting majority of the great bulk of the states is still white.  If whites beging to vote against the Democrats for racial reasons no amount of Asian and Latino fear of the GOP will help the Dems retain any power. 

This election showed that the GOP as White Party meme is starting to happen - for white people.  The elite media are so wedded to their pet ideology (multiculturalism, etc.) that they are literally unable to see that this is a great thing for the Republicans and a terrible thing for the Democrats, even when they Tsunami of 2012 has just washed over them.

Posted by eh on Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:16 | #

Strange behavior by the BBC considering Operation Trident was specifically set up to target such crime among Blacks. The BBC even says so on its own web site:

Q&A;: Operation Trident

Operation Trident, a Metropolitan Police team dedicated to tackling gun crime within the black community,...

Is it possible for the BBC to be even more contemptible? They are giving it a go apparently.

Posted by BBC facing mass layoffs. Poetic justice. on Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:58 | #

https://youtu.be/JZXkaDBZuwg