British Democracy and the Jews. Again.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 07 July 2010 02:06.

Not much going on here by way of new posts. So I thought I might as well put up links to a couple of fun threads at the British Democracy Forum. You know the BDF. It’s the place where everybody spits on the wilton when someone mistakenly mentions the leader’s name. But they don’t spit as much as the good folk of Nationalists Online. Now, they know how to spit, I can tell you. They do practically nothing else all day, from what I can judge. They are swimming in it. At least, I think that’s what it is.

Anyway, this scurrilous person Henry Palfrey has, in the most unwelcome and improper way, been introducing the JQ to pure-hearted British nationalists on the BDF who, to be honest, do not need dynosaur thinking of that ilk. Obviously. One of the threads is titled BNP need to be more like National Front. It’s fifteen pages long at this point, so I suggest a quick skim and nothing more. You may come across Soren on it somewhere. The other thread is new and is titled Michael Savage: Now It’s A Crime To Be White? Except the person who posted it belongs to a people who are not absolutely unequivocally white themselves.

Tags: No particular place to go

Comments:

Posted by Tanstaafl on Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:05 | #

Savage is like Auster in that they both fear Henry Palfrey’s scenario 2 is most likely:

2. White America does not save itself from the MultiCult, and the Jews find they cannot control the beast as expected. It devours them also. Well, anyone could have told them that.

Savage and Auster are trying to tell them, though Auster is more obsessed with “anti-semitism” and more wont to shit on Whites, especially those native to what he calls “the Dead Island”.

Posted by Bill on Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:05 | #

GW. BDF P8 @73 In reply to Chrono Mizaki.

All one can say is that in a liberal milieu the radicalism of nationalism is not understood, and perhaps cannot be spoken of.

I like that.

If you don’t know what it’s like to be white English - then your not.

The more I read these people the more I understand their mantra - ‘I did the right thing.’

Posted by Sam Davidson on Wed, 07 Jul 2010 23:29 | #

Well, that discussion you had on democracyforum.co.uk seemed especially pointless.

I talked with my English friend this week and he told me about a television show he was watching.
“The Sex Education Show” - sexual obscenity paraded as education. You’ll also notice that the show puts the Union Jack all over the background. It’s on coffee mugs, sofa cushions, and even the background logo. Somehow the show wants to associate this excessive sexuality with “Britishness.”

http://sexperienceuk.channel4.com/sex-education/season/archives/season-3

I can’t find very much information about who created the show or who writes it. However, it does appear on Channel 4, and the Chief Executive for this channel is David Abraham. The first Chairman was Edmund Dell. Both Jews.

The Goncourt brothers noted the rise of pornography in the France of their day: “Pornographic literature,” they wrote, “serves a Bas-Empire. . . one tames a people as one tames lions, by masturbation.” -B. F. Skinner

To be honest, many European ‘nationalists’ seem downright ignorant. They always criticize us American “anti-semites” for emphasizing the Jewish Question. They say that in Europe the Jews are not responsible for their decline thus a Jewish reductionism is false. Yet, when I investigate European problems I find the same people behind it all. An example that springs to mind is France’s 1968 turmoil. From my limited investigations it seemed to be the result of agitating by Jewish radicals like Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Alain Geismar, and Alain Krivine.

In Europe you can criticize the corporations all you want. You can criticize other Europeans all you want. But never criticize the Jews or their blood libel of Europeans. You’ll go to prison for that. (Can we perhaps ally with the Jews against Islam? Try it. They’ll defend the Muslims against Europe just like they did during the Swiss minaret ban.)

Posted by Armor on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:14 | #

“The Sex Education Show” - sexual obscenity paraded as education.

In France, you can now watch the program “Le sexe, mes parents et moi” on MTV France (cable TV).
It is an adaptation of MTV’s “Sex…with Mom and Dad”.

(I couldn’t watch the trailer on their website. Maybe you have to sign up first.)

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:07 | #

Sam,

Pretty pointless, I agree. Unlike MR, where there are a lot of people who bring fresh insights to the discussion, and where we generally try to advance our understanding, BDF has a fair few members who painted themselves into a particular ideological corner a long time ago. By and large, what they want is to prove their rightness to themselves in lieu of the fact that the world keeps turning.

I received another “infraction” from the boss today (my third), this time for pulling a Jewess’s leg after she had splurged the usual hate-garbage at me. It seems that the Jewess has not been reprimanded - something I intend to take up with this guy. But, anyway, he seems terrified in case “waycism” makes an appearance on the thread, and the resultant heavy hand is extremely unconducive to free discussion. I’m assuming that’s why so little of interest gets said, even by the two people who I know from private correspondence are very able.

Good to see Soren floating around. Not quite sure why.

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:09 | #

It’s a question of trying to strike the right balance, Fred, over here.

Posted by Bill on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:08 | #

Sorry! I cannot claim this is on topic.

Since I first discovering the rabbit hole on the Internet, I had no idea of how deep and complex it was to turn out to be. It is deep, it is extensive and is equally, if not moreso, complex.

Over the years, I’ve oft read repeatedly a certain theme that has intrigued me, and has stuck with me.

‘WTSHTF’. (When the sh*t hits the fan)

I’m sure most, if not all here, is familiar with this prophecy of doom, but what does it really mean?

To me, (being a half empty sorta guy) ‘WTSHTF’ is some vague future defining moment when some momentous event or transformation occurs. At one minute to midnight everything is OK, life is proceeding as ‘normal’ and at one minute past midnight, catastrophe has struck and our lives will never be the same again.

However,my problem is, how will we know when that moment has arrived? How will this moment manifest itself and become clear to all that the sh*t really has hit the fan?

For example. In recent years, the global econonmic situation has dominated certain websites with the predominant theme that the world’s economies are in free fall and when the ‘WTSHTF,’ life as we have known it will be no more.

Has that moment arrived? Are we now living in a post ‘WTSHTF’ economic world? Because if we are, I think I must have missed something, for when I step outside of the virtual world (‘Net) lo and behold everything is functioning as ‘normal’, most folk are glued to the box watching the world cup, most folk still have a roof over their head, run a car, have a job and continue to visit Disneyland - in fact life is proceeding as ‘normal’. So what have I missed?

All of this of course leads me to asking the biggie. How will we know when we have been race replaced?

Posted by Gorboduc on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:07 | #

Bill: I suppose that WTSHTF someone is supposed to turn the power off, and the rest of us get out the mops and buckets.

No-one in the UK office had really noticed the pile-up of excreta in a dangerously-poised position: we were all taken by surprise and wonderingly said, How could the bosses allow this to happen?

Actually, the fan has in reality been delivering carefully-graded but increasing doses of sh*t for some time, and those who noticed and complained were told, That’s the way it is: get used to it: plenty more where that came from: why should YOU be different? It suits everyone else.

Consequently many folks have become so used to it they don’t notice it, and if their hair and hands and even their sandwiches stopped smelling of sh*t they’d start to feel worried. Hell, it’s a communal task: we’ve all got to take some of it home with us, it gives us something in common!
Or even: it’s s free gift, handed out by the authorities: it has to go somewhere and I expect it’s really quite good for us, and after all, all medicines are nasty, aren’t they?

Well you won’t know you’ve been race-replaced any more than you’ll know you’re dead: but you can see and feel the barbed arrow deep in your side and see the eventual result.

Every time I step onto a local bus the arrow shifts a bit deeper: and later the fan in the UK office whirs round a bit faster, and a bit more - um, “debris” comes my way: on the bus I can refuse to pay my ticket, I can get off and lie down in front of the bus in the road and demand that the Turks and blacks be thrown off, and in the UK office I can rant about Magna Carta, and push the furniture over a bit; but I need help - big help - to shift the pile of excreta, smash the fan, clean off myself and my colleagues, and get rid of the bosses and their tame electricians and “waste disposal experts” who set up the system, and open a new business in a new premisses.
Before I die…

Posted by Armor on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:10 | #

“I’ve noticed the same thing as Sam Davidson: Europeans don’t want to hear anything about the Jews.”

Anti-racist laws are bound to have their effect.

“Yet, when I investigate European problems I find the same people behind it all. An example that springs to mind is France’s 1968 turmoil. From my limited investigations it seemed to be the result of agitating by Jewish radicals like Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Alain Geismar, and Alain Krivine.”

At the time, in France, many of the intellectual (phony) elites were Jews too. I suspect those who were not (Jean-Paul Sartre, Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault…) owed their careers and their visibility to their Jewish friends.

Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont wrote a book about phony intellectuals called Fashionable Nonsense. (1997)

Wikipedia :
“The stated goal of the book is not to attack “philosophy, the humanities or the social sciences in general…but to warn those who work in them (especially students) against some manifest cases of charlatanism.” In particular to “deconstruct” the notion that some books and writers are difficult because they deal with profound and difficult ideas. “If the texts seem incomprehensible, it is for the excellent reason that they mean precisely nothing.”

The book includes long extracts from the works of Jacques Lacan, Julia Kristeva, Paul Virilio, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, Luce Irigaray, Bruno Latour, and Jean Baudrillard who are considered by some to be leading academics of Continental philosophy, critical theory, psychoanalysis or social sciences.”

It seems the authors were careful not to include Jews in their demonstration. Even so, I think it is largely a Jewish problem. In the 1970s, Jewish American journalists would interview members of the French intellectual “elites”, who would look very intelligent, or full of nonsense, depending if you believed in it or not. But I think those phony elites were largely a Jewish phenomenon. And today, many European nationalists will criticize the American ideology of invading the world and killing ethnic identities, and they will refuse to see that it is largely a Jewish ideology. I have even heard a French nationalist complain of the American ideology that promotes people like Marx, Marcuse and Freud.

Posted by Bill on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:54 | #

Gorbo. July 08, 2010, 10:07 AM

Well you won’t know you’ve been race-replaced any more than you’ll know you’re dead:

Hmm! Yes I’ve been thinking along those lines myself. Is that the best we can hope for? Will anyone care when we’re gone? These body snatchers have really done their homework.

Thanks anyway, I assume you are describing observations of your life and work in and around London.

My grandchildren of 17 and 9 watch endless multicultural BBC kid’s programmes and are truly oblivious, they have been body snatched already. (Same goes for adults)

Posted by Gorboduc on Sun, 11 Jul 2010 02:20 | #

Armor:
I introduced Sokal and Bricmont here a year and a half ago:

Posted by Filius Sancti Bonifacii on January 28, 2009, 02:04 AM | #

Diamed, you can’t have it both ways.
If we LOOK like an evolutionarily unfit bunch, then our PROSPECTS are actually a component of that picture!
I’m not sure what dimensions you’re talking about.
Yes, the Universe has length, breadth and height and exists in time, but it seems to me that you’re calling scientific terminology in to illustrate a metaphysical/philosophical/historical matter.
That sort of thing is fine for Lacan and Baudrillard and the other folks pilloried in Sokal and Bricmont’s book “Intellectual Impostures”. I can’t see that it helps here.

I changed my name but it was me. I’m sticking with my present one.
I think I was saying that some of the stuff introduced here by evolutionists was so airy-fairy - not at all hard-nosed physical science - that it came into the category of, dare I say it, the sort of stuff S. & B. were criticising.
I like one of the guys that S. & B. dissed, Paul Virilio.
He designed a Museum of Accidents: we are all in it.
However, his surname is so rare and strange that I wondered if it was a made-up one, like that of Raymond AbellioI