Posted by jamesUK on Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:40 | #

What is your take on the Nordic aliens theory?

 

Posted by Our Definition of Aliens on Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:35 | #

Our definition of Aliens

Aliens

Aliens

Aliens

Aliens

Aliens

Aliens

Alien Emmanuel Celler - sponsoring 50 years of Aliens with the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act, a.k.a. the Hart-Celler Act: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

Posted by Ranking the Muslim problem on Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:11 | #

Greg Johnson on The Muslim problem and its relative place among problems:

http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/01/the-muslim-problem/

Faye, however, wants us to believe that there are good and bad Jews. And he has never uttered a peep about sending either group away. My attitude toward Jews is exactly analogous to his views about Muslims: there are good and bad Jews, but such distinctions should not distract us from the overriding necessity of freeing European lands from Jewish power, and that means separating ourselves from the whole community. I want good and moderate Jews to flourish, but in Israel, with the rest of their people.

Faye won’t say it, because he is engaged in political maneuvering rather than truth-telling. That’s why I cleave to metapolitics: I want to speak the whole truth as I see it. And, in the longest World War of all — between the seed of Abraham and the rest of humanity — telling the truth is also the only practical thing to do, since, as Faye says, we must name the enemy. We cannot fight an enemy we cannot name.

Faye clearly does not want to be the enemy of the Jews. But what Faye wants does not matter, as his quote from Julien Freund implies: “Even if you do not choose the enemy, the enemy chooses you. . . .  As long as he wants you to be the enemy, you are. And it will prevent you from tending your own garden.”

It takes two to make friends, only one to make enemies. And the Jewish community has marked Faye as the enemy, along with all the rest of us. Whites are slated for extermination by the kinds of genocidal policies that Jews refuse to accept in their own country while imposing them on ours. Since Jews are more aware of what promotes genocide than any other people, it is folly to think that they are unaware or ashamed of this double standard. They consciously intend to destroy us as a race, and all non-white immigrants, not just the most militant and obnoxious among them, are just Jewish biological weapons of mass destruction.

Agreed that Jews have to be separated from whether bad or relatively good. A more difficult problem comes in with quarter Jews, etc.

Posted by Mick Lately on Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:06 | #

They know that we know.

Why are we so sure that they won’t apply hot genocide?

Posted by Edgar Steele on anti-semitism on Fri, 30 Jan 2015 18:27 | #

Edgar Steele in defense of anti-semitism: Audio file -
http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/audio/antisemite.m3u

Text
http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/antisemite2.htm

Excerpt

Beneath Every Rock

Supposedly, Jews account for 2-1/2 per cent of the American population.  Why, then, is half the student body at Harvard and most every Ivy League college Jewish?  Statistics simply are not kept as to the percentage of Jews in this profession or that, but when was the last time you saw a doctor whose name did not end in “berg,” “man” or “stein?”  I’m not sure I have ever met a psychiatrist who wasn’t Jewish.  On the other hand, have you ever seen a Jewish farmer or mechanic?

Rarely do I appear in court, but what the guy on the other side of the courtroom - and often as not, the judge, too - is Jewish.  And, it is incredible the deference paid by the bench to the Jewish DA, or whoever, sitting at the other counsel table.  There has been more than one trial where I could have merely phoned in my participation, for all the good it mattered that I was even there.

So many complain about what bankers, especially the international and central bankers, are doing to our country.  Yet, hardly anybody seems to have noticed that those people are almost exclusively Jewish.

Behind Every Tree

They are everywhere in the media, particularly Hollywood.  Talking heads, movie stars and the like.  Curly hair, hook nose and names that rhyme.  Pay attention and you will be amazed.  The names won’t always be a good guideline, however, given how many changed their names at the turn of last century, so as to meld into the American population of that time.

Jews seem to comprise about 50% of America’s population, based upon those in visible positions.  Looks can be deceiving, though, because, like Harvard, they are drawn to those positions by their money, their intelligence and, most importantly, the indulgence of their kosher comrades.

People refuse to notice the Jewish hands on virtually ever power lever in the US federal government.  Or at the helm of virtually every media organization that exists, and throughout the executive and editorial ranks.  And, it’s not just Jews that control America - they are Zionists.  Even Ariel Sharon, Israel’s current Prime Minister, has said openly, “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” (October 3, 2001).  Problem is, most of us seem not to know it.

The Power Behind the Throne

Books have been written on the subject, but, essentially, a group of late 19th-century elites, comprised of Rockefeller, Morgan and others, mostly Jewish, established an organization designed to consolidate their control of America and, eventually, the entire world.  It was called the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).  Offshoots, such as the Bilderbergers, have formed since then, but the objective has never slipped from their sight. 

One of the first acts of CFR’s members was to survey the newspaper field, the sole mass media of the time, and conclude that purchasing control of only 25 major newspapers would give them effective control of news dissemination.  They bought those papers and, since then, many, many more.  Today, members of these shadowy organizations literally run virtually all of the media, control the political structure in America, much of world business and are firmly in control of world banking.

That is why the two political parties in America have become identical, so as to provide us rubes with the illusion of throwing the rascals out come election time, yet with the same old agenda not missing a beat.  Did you really see a difference from Bush to Clinton to Bush?  They knew what NAFTA would do to America’s manufacturing base and job structure, yet both parties embraced it.  We are firmly on a path to one-world government.  America writ large, but the America now being molded without individual civil rights, not the America of the 20th Century.  And it’s largely kosher.

Read “The Israeli Spy Ring Scandal” (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/spyring2.html) for a particularly chilling look into the extent of the Israeli spy ring recently uncovered in America and Israel’s extensive US telephone network ownership.

It is not the purpose of this essay to prove Jewish control of America.  There is ample material available on the internet for those who wish to prove it for themselves.  Rather, it is my purpose to show that there are perfectly valid and understandable, even laudable, reasons for being anti-Semitic.  Resenting those who manipulate us on a daily basis, against our own best interests, is primary among them.

....
Hate laws are a singularly Jewish invention being foisted upon an unsuspecting public, so as to preemptively remove the possibility of criticism of themselves.  Often written by the ADL, the organization that lobbies for their adoption, state by state, the laws are designed to stifle dissent and speaking out.

Posted by White GeNocide on Sun, 01 Feb 2015 02:25 | #

White Genocide:

http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/7/310/show_7310647_2015_01_30_21_29_49.mp3

Posted by Nick Griffin interview on Sun, 01 Feb 2015 02:29 | #

Nick Griffin discusses Putin, The US and strategy for White Nationalism.

http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/7/310/show_7310647_2015_01_30_21_29_49.mp3

Posted by jamesUK on Mon, 02 Feb 2015 05:32 | #

Be gone troll JamesUK

Posted by jamesUK on Mon, 02 Feb 2015 08:58 | #

What’s with the censorship?  Duke is one of one of the most prominent WN leaders in the US.

As for the content of video it highlights one of the main points of critique I listed about the WN movement of an imaginary persecution syndrome that a) most populations of Europe are still overwhelmingly the ethnic white majorities and b) internal immigration from new EU member states into Britain. 

The video is factually wrong as other non-white countries like United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia have higher number of immigrants than European countries.

UAE 87.3%
KSA 31.4%

http://youtu.be/dwJ6i8goO2Q

Posted by "only White countries" on Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:40 | #

Posted by jamesUK on February 02, 2015, 03:58 AM | #

What’s with the censorship? 

We censor trolls and those who can’t fit within our editorial parameters.

Duke is one of one of the most prominent WN leaders in the US.

Critique of Duke is valid, but talk of aliens and what not, as if that is our standard fare, is not; more, having watched your comments for a while it is clear generally that your intentions here are not constructive.

As for the content of video it highlights one of the main points of critique I listed about the WN movement of an imaginary persecution syndrome

There is no imaginary persecution. Non-White immigration has not been popular in America or Europe. It has not been voted for (just the opposite). It has been imposed upon Americans, for example (number one on your list), by stealth of Jewish phraseology, by Jewish lobbying, legislation, lawyers and judges.

that a) most populations of Europe are still overwhelmingly the ethnic white majorities

“most”? Why shouldn’t they all be, and why shouldn’t they be truly “overwhelmingly” White - 100% of those holding citizenship? Instead of several slated to become native minority in decades?

“and b) internal immigration from new EU member states into Britain.”

We don’t advocate that kind of immigration in any significant number either.

The video is factually wrong as other non-white countries like United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia have higher number of immigrants than European countries.

UAE 87.3%
KSA 31.4%

Note that I entitled the post “destruction” of European peoples. There is no part of that that we should not be able to challenge. Not one European person should be sacrificed for your false god race. The genocide argument is valid, but the bugster’s mantra - “White countries and only White countries” failed me as too complicated to defend the very first time I tried it - when I was challenged that India had significant immigration. Thus, I do not use it personally. True or not, the mantra is not my argument. Nevertheless, it is true enough in spirit and it has energetic activists working with it. Even if other countries have immigration, that does not mean that native Europeans are not being destroyed and that there are not catastrophic numbers of non-Whites and miscegenation being promoted to the destruction of European peoples.

Posted by 14 on Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:40 | #

14

http://davidduke.com/dr-duke-breaks-jewish-supremacism-possible-congressional-run-dr-kevin-macdonald/

Posted by jamesUK on Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:04 | #

@14

That’s does answer any of the questions raised in the link I provided that you deleted (got something to hide?) from a Duke associate and insider and an investigative journalist that wrote a book on Duke.

Posted by Edgar on Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:35 | #

Nothing to hide, there can be criticisms of Duke, it is just that your motives and the spin that comes along with your posts are clearly not meant to serve White interests, but rather meant to divert and diminish our advocacy.

I suspect that it is you who is trying to hide and divert attention from comment #5:

Edgar Steele in defense of anti-semitism: Audio file -
http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/audio/antisemite.m3u

Text
http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/antisemite2.htm

Posted by jamesUK on Tue, 03 Feb 2015 21:38 | #

@Edgar

Seems you like to deflect from the issue of David Duke that in my previous post I just referred to allegations of Duke being a con man and COINTELPRO. No mention of aliens that we can discuss at a later date.

Posted by jamesUK on Tue, 03 Feb 2015 21:53 | #

@Edgar

Don’t know why my comment was cut off that I posted so I will try to comment again on the issue that Edgar Steele raises.

Isn’t Edgar Steele the dude that was sent to and died in prison for conspiring to kill his wife?

The high representation of Jews in professions and academy in the US is no mystery as Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ of any other ethnic or racial group. that you will find high representation of Jews in high profile/higher education positions where they have a sizable majority whither it be in the US, France, Britain, Ukraine or Russia.

http://youtu.be/MOnQPXuU81Q?t=14m27s

Even Ariel Sharon, Israel’s current Prime Minister, has said openly, “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” (October 3, 2001).  Problem is, most of us seem not to know it.

That quote was debunked coming from Palestinian sources.

These quotes originated with the pro-Hamas American group Islamic Association for Palestine in an Oct. 13, 2001 press release, which claimed its source as Israeli radio Kol Yisrael:

According [to] the Israeli Hebrew radio, Col Yisrael Wednesday, Peres warned Sharon that refusing to heed incessant American requests for a cease-fire with the Palestinians would endanger Israeli interests and turn the US against us. At this point, a furious Sharon reportedly turned toward Peres, saying “ . . . I want to tell you something clear, don’t worry about American pressure on Israel, we the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it.”…

Elsewhere in the press release, the quote was repeated, albeit slightly altered to: “we control America.”

CAMERA received confirmation from Kol Yisrael political correspondent Yoni Ben-Menachem, who reports on Cabinet meetings, that he never made such a broadcast and that Sharon never made such a statement.

http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=7&x_issue=21&x_article=373

 

Posted by JewishJamesUK on Wed, 04 Feb 2015 01:39 | #

“Isn’t Edgar Steele the dude that was sent to and died in prison for conspiring to kill his wife?”

Correction, he is the one who was set up as supposedly designing to kill his wife for insurance money (when, in fact, she was not even insured).

“Don’t know why my comment was cut off”

Because you are a troll, a Jewish troll - at least that is perfectly clear now. But now that that is clear, accountable for your position and prejudices known, your status registers less a troll and more one whose comments might be deleted for being out of bounds.

Here you are not quite out of bounds as you throw softball contentions. Everyone knows Steele was set-up and framed..

“The high representation of Jews in professions and academy in the US is no mystery as Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ of any other ethnic or racial group.”

The i.q. factor has been adjusted for to show that they are vastly overrepresented due to nepotism and other corrupt means.

As for the quote attributed to Sharon, even if shown to be false as a quote, it is a trivial correction since what is being attributed to Sharon is more than true enough as a generality. The Senate, the Congress etc, does not go against AIPAC etc.

Posted by jamesUK on Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:03 | #

@JewishJamesUK

Correction, he is the one who was set up as supposedly designing to kill his wife for insurance money (when, in fact, she was not even insured).

Why?

Wikipedia entry does not mention insurance as a motive just that he was unhappy in his marriage and was seeking a relationship with a Ukrainian woman.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Steele#Arrest_for_conspiracy_to_commit_murder

The i.q. factor has been adjusted for to show that they are vastly overrepresented due to nepotism and other corrupt means

I seriously doubt that seeing how the same pattern can be seen in other countries where they have less influence in state positions like in Russia.

What about Duke?

Duke pleaded guilty to what prosecutors described as a six-year scheme to dupe thousands of his followers by asking for donations. Through postal mail, Duke later appealed to his supporters that he was about to lose his house and his life savings. Prosecutors claimed that Duke raised hundreds of thousands of dollars in this campaign. Prosecutors also claimed he sold his home at a hefty profit, had multiple investment accounts, and spent much of his money gambling at casinos.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke#Criticism.2C_legal_difficulties.2C_and_felony_conviction

His best friend Don Black has a shady past as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Black_(white_nationalist)#The_Ku_Klux_Klan_and_Operation_Red_Dog

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 04 Feb 2015 06:06 | #

Jewish James says:

Why?

Wikipedia entry does not mention insurance as a motive just that he was unhappy in his marriage and was seeking a relationship with a Ukrainian woman.

Wikipedia is censured to protect Jewish interests.

  The i.q. factor has been adjusted for to show that they are vastly overrepresented due to nepotism and other corrupt means

I seriously doubt that seeing how the same pattern can be seen in other countries where they have less influence in state positions like in Russia.

Your serious doubt is wrong.

Regarding Duke and Black, we are not here to defend them, they can defend themselves. We are here to defend Whites and White patterns that need defending.

Now then, developing what Edgar had said: Anti-semitism is a disease, you catch it from Jews -

Tanstaafl

Age of Treason Radio http://age-of-treason.com/?s=

Pathology and Pathogen

Andrew Joyce’s recent article, The Bizarre World of Dr Theodore Isaac Rubin, is mostly excellent. It’s about how jews explain “anti-semitism”:

  Although written in 2009, Rubin’s Anti-Semitism: A Disease of the Mind,[1] is in several respects a relic of a by-gone era in that it is a classic work of old-school Freudianism and psychoanalysis.MacDonald noted in CoC that:

      One way in which psychoanalysis has served specific Jewish interests is the development of theories of anti-Semitism that bear the mantle of science by deemphasizing the importance of conflicts of interest between Jews and gentiles. Although these theories very greatly in detail — and, as typical of psychoanalytic theories generally, there is no way to empirically decide among them — within this body of theory anti-Semitism is viewed as a form of gentile psychopathology resulting from projections, repressions, and reaction formations stemming ultimately from a pathology-inducing society.[2]

  Rather than antipathy being a natural and normal result of real conflicts of interest, antipathy towards Jews is thus seen as a psychological illness — owing absolutely nothing to the behavior of Jews, and everything to Western culture. This is the central thrust of Rubin’s book.

  Rubin wastes no time in applying medical and psychiatric language to anti-Jewish attitudes. They comprise (11–12) a “malignant emotional illness,” a “psychiatric illness,” and a “chronic, pandemic and incredibly destructive disease.”

I agree with Joyce and MacDonald’s assessment. Antipathy is a natural and normal result of real conflicts of interest. I would add that the key word in “conflicts of interest” is conflict, and the roots of the antipathy and conflict are racial. More than anything else, Joyce’s article brings out the clash between White and jewish mentality – the completely different way each group sees the conflict between the groups.

These are racial differences in mental processes. As MacDonald summarizes part of A People That Shall Dwell Alone:

  Briefly, the idea is that Jews, or at least Ashkenazi Jews, are high on several personality systems, resulting in 1.) tendencies toward personalities that react intensely to environmental contingencies (i.e., high on the emotionality system), 2.) strongly attracted to dominance, social status, reward (including sex), and prone to aggressiveness (i.e., high on the behavioral approach system), and 3.) able to have strong top-down control over modular systems related to emotions and behavioral approach (i.e., high on the conscientiousness system).

  . . .

  I updated ..“Background Traits for Jewish Activism” (2003) which focuses on traits ..most important for the success of Jewish activism: hyper-ethnocentrism, intelligence, psychological intensity (emotionality), and aggressiveness.

..jews are a race of ruthless crooks and liars, at least when it comes to dealing with Whites.

Jews are instinctively collectivist and assign jewish interests the highest priority, to the point they have co-opted science and committed fraud to serve that end. In the jewish mind emotionalism trumps rationalism. They also tend to project their negative thinking onto the Other.

Whites, in contrast, are relatively individualist and universalist, with a higher regard for objectivity. In the White mind rationalism trumps emotionalism. Whites tend to project our positive thinking onto the Other. These are tendencies, partly encoded in our genes, partly inculcated into our minds after birth. The big difference is group consciousness. The jews inculcate their own with an unapologetic preference for their own kind and distaste for the Other. Jews inculcate most Whites too, but with exactly the opposite moral standards.

This kind of lopsidedness, or asymmetry, is characteristic of the entire history and nature of the conflict between Whites and jews. Jews have continuously aggressed against Whites. Whites, for the most part, have been oblivious of this. As Joyce observes, jews unabashedly distort reality and invert the conflict, placing 100% of the blame for it on Whites. Jews use the most harsh-sounding biomedical terms, describing their enemies not as participants in a conflict with an opposing point of view, but as pests who should be simply silenced and even exterminated.

Whites, in contrast, have generally reacted to this kind of bombast by recoiling defensively, in denial, trying to argue that they aren’t congenital monsters the jews accuse them of being. In accordance with our instinct for objectivity, Whites consistently step outside and above the conflict, to seek out some less harsh-sounding explanation for it. We imagine, for example, that the jews aren’t so different and must be deceiving themselves, because that’s how Whites tend to deal with unpleasant realities.

The real root of this asymmetry, as the jews recognize, is biomedical. The jews are racially distinct. They are far more racially conscious, far more aware of racial distinctions. They not only see the distinction between themselves and others more clearly, they are more willing and able to ruthlessly exploit those differences.

The jews dedicate a great deal of effort not only to nurturing their own consciousness, but to tearing down such consciousness in their hosts. The jewish pseudo-science of psychoanalysis Joyce examines is an example of both – excusing and leveraging their own consciousness and ethnocentrism while at the same time they psychopathologize White consciousness and ethnocentrism.

Joyce calls attention to the key component of this psychopathologizing:

  Another of Rubin’s assertions, and this is equally common among many Jewish psychologists and academics, is that those holding anti-Jewish attitudes are low in self-esteem and are (31) “desperate for simplistic explanation and solutions, especially for those they may find outside themselves.” But ‘anti-Jewish theory,’ if one wants to call it that, is far from simplistic. The assumption is made by the psychoanalysts that since the only problem causing conflict with Jews exists solely in the mind of the ‘anti-Semite,’ then the ‘anti-Semite’ needs only a ‘symbol’ to cure his own inner conflicts — this symbol is the Jew. He is said to cling to the simplistic belief that “the Jews” are behind all of his personal problems, and thus he can externalize his internal conflicts by ‘hating’ Jews, and somehow raising his own self-importance and self-esteem in the process. But this assessment is built on a deeply flawed assessment of both anti-Semitism and the holder of anti-Jewish attitudes.

Overall I think Joyce s very perceptive, but in this I think it’s his assessment of jewish behavior that’s flawed. The jews are not making a mistake. It is about esteem.

First of all, by blaming “anti-semitism” they are excusing themselves, placating and even feeding their own already enormous collective esteem for themselves as a people. Second, they are deliberately attacking the esteem of “anti-semites”, in other words, those Whites who are most racially conscious and most aware of the jews. The attack the jews make elicits a defensive posture, causing their enemy to question themselves. That the jews cloak their attack in scientific terms, as a medical diagnosis, is an intentional deception. Such fraud is a feature of their aggression, not a flaw.

  The psychoanalysts never acknowledge that some of the most high-profile anti-Jewish writers of the past have been at pains to blame their own people and nation before the Jews — there has never been a rush to ‘externalize’ all blame for the ills of society.

The jews get the defensive response they seek: “B-but we’re not stupid or crazy. A-allow me to provide some objective arguments and examples.” Joyce supplies several paragraphs in this vein, and it’s as eye-opening and edifying as his writing usually is. He perceives the jews as enemies, but the examples he cites demonstrate the point. Throughout history even the most notorious “anti-semites” have been far too willing, in the attempt to be objective and fair, to blame our own people, to fruitlessly seek some built-in flaws our race simply must have, somewhere.

The irony is that in striking such a defensive posture it is self-esteem which keeps us from accepting that this behavior is the flaw we’re looking for. Whites don’t have an inherent racial lack of self-esteem relative to jews, we have a relative lack of group-esteem. We have a relative willingness to accept responsibility, especially guilt, especially collectively.

I don’t think this lack is entirely inborn. I think a large portion of it is induced by jews pushing the psychological button Joyce has noticed but mistaken the significance of. Jews have been moralizing and lecturing Whites for millenia now that, “It’s all your fault, you stupid/crazy/evil goyim.” While some Whites are able to shrug it off, few actually see it for the purposeful guilt-tripping, the aggression, the assault it is.

  Contrary to the arguments of the psychoanalysts, the problem always contains a very significant internal element, and thus the holder of anti-Jewish attitudes is rarely free to simply blame all on ‘the Other.’

  This phenomenon continues today. Critics of Jews are equally concerned with developing an understanding not only of Jewish power and influence, but also of the pathology of Whites that has facilitated Jewish power and influence as well as the current disaster of displacement-level immigration and multiculturalism. The emphasis is on the identification of multiple sources and origins of the current societal malaise, and on evidence-based intellectual and scientific investigation of all aspects of the interactions between Jews and non-Jews in all locations and throughout historical time. This activity can in no way be seen as the seeking of simplistic answers.

This is the problem. The jews shamelessly attack and blame everything on their enemies. And in response their enemies, not wanting to appear simplistic, try to rationalize and intellectualize and demonstrate how fair-minded they are. That is “white pathology” in a nutshell.

As I’ve said before, where there is a pathology there must be a pathogen. So what is it? If we’re going to speak of this phenomena in biomedical terms, then let’s grab the bullshit by the horns, shall we?

Jews clearly see that there is a conflict of interests, first and foremost with Whites. Whites are now so deracinated and ennervated that they are afraid to see any conflict whatsoever, because that would make them “racists”. Jews hate Whites. Whites worship jews. Whatever anyone thinks caused this situation, this lopsided Stockholm Syndrome relationship with jews, it’s clear that to the extent most Whites even see it as a problem, they blame jews for approximately none of it. Instead, the popular explanation is the jewish explanation: Whites are to blame for all of it.

“White pathology” is a non-explanation for this situation. For one thing, the idea forgets or at least downplays the racial conflict. Joyce at least brings it up while discussing the jews. More often it is used alone, without any mention of jews or their aggression, implying there is some “suicidal” problem baked into Whites and only Whites.

The idea is solipsistic. It is a self-satisfying pathologization of Whites. It plays on the same psychological mechanism behind the jewish explanation of “anti-semitism”. It’s an attack on our self-esteem, our fear of being seen as “stupid” for seeing an enemy as an enemy. Which, if you think about it, is what’s really stupid.

What’s also really telling about the falseness of the idea is that the term itself has a completely different meaning to most Whites. When racially conscious Whites say “white pathology”, they mean Whites as a group aren’t racially conscious enough. But if you try and explain “white pathology” to a typical deracinated White they’ll take it as confirmation that Whites, especially Whites like you, are too “racist”.

The “white pathology” idea appeals to the racially aware because there is a grain of truth to it. It’s a diagnosis that comes close but literally gets stuck on the pathology, the symptoms, and too often neglects to ever identify the cause, the pathogen. If Whites are behaving pathologically, well-meaning Whites should be doing their best to identify the pathogen causing this behavior. We should be seeking, without fear, ways to neutralize the cause, rather than ourselves.

The problem is not that Whites have blamed the jews too much. Quite the opposite. It’s clear that the jews have encouraged this solipsistic attitude exactly because it serves them. Thinking Whites alone, right now, determine White destiny is a notion that appeals especially to the most racially conscious Whites. But it is a fantasy as long as most Whites remain, as they are, unconscious of any collective destiny.

Calling the jews pathogens or parasites it is not an idle insult. Nor is it an excuse for Whites, their hosts. In fact, it’s a degrading and humiliating situation that is painful for Whites to acknowledge. Such terms are simply more honest and explicative. It is an acknowledgement not just of the conflict but its asymmetric nature. Among the benefits of calling a parasite a parasite is parasitology – an existing body of understanding based on true science, which offers practical insights and potential solutions no amount of “white pathology” navel-gazing ever will. Another benefit: Rather than misdirecting White resentment toward ourselves, it is directed at the cause, where it belongs – the detestable, whiny, self-obsessed, manipulative, exploitative jews. Without jews Whites would still have problems – but these “anti-semitism”/”white pathology” bugbears wouldn’t be among them.

Examples of this pathogen at work are easy to find in the mainstream jewsmedia

Posted by jamesUK on Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:55 | #

@DanielS

Wikipedia is censured to protect Jewish interests.

Proof?

Your serious doubt is wrong.

I don’t think so.

Regarding Duke and Black, we are not here to defend them, they can defend themselves. We are here to defend Whites and White patterns that need defending.

They are the most high profile leaders of the WN movement in the US so they are the political representation of what WN believe in the US.

Other WN’s include Pierce and associates who are a mix of terrorists, mass shooters, a would be wife killer and a paedophile. 

These are people representing the white cause in the US that consists of talking about immigration and complaining about Jews. Lol!

Perhaps instead of bitching and moaning about Jews, WW2, “white genocide”, etc. all the arm chair warriors who couldn’t even be bothered to attend the conference in Hungry encase it got banned actually got physically politically active perhaps they might have achieved something. 

http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/09/budapest-conference-update/

Posted by WikipediaForJews on Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:36 | #

osted by jamesUK on February 05, 2015, 09:55 AM | #

@DanielS

  Wikipedia is censured to protect Jewish interests.

Proof?

You don’t even try to camouflage your trolling. Everyone knows wikipedia is a Jewish controlled operation. Just try changing any article that has to do with pro White interests or a pro White personage and it will very quickly be returned to smear and negative spin.

I was blocked from submitting an article on the obvious phenomenon of “mulatto supremacism.” It even has notable historical precedent in Haiti.

But the proof is to be found on videos which reveal Israeli boiler rooms - groups of people paid to spin wiki articles in a jewish way.

  Your serious doubt is wrong.

I don’t think so.

Well, you are wrong and not worth arguing with.

  Regarding Duke and Black, we are not here to defend them, they can defend themselves. We are here to defend Whites and White patterns that need defending.

They are the most high profile leaders of the WN movement in the US so they are the political representation of what WN believe in the US.

You don’t get to say who is represented by them. They represent themselves, or anybody who wants to be represented by them, which is not us.

Other WN’s include Pierce and associates who are a mix of terrorists, mass shooters, a would be wife killer and a paedophile.

Steele was not a would-be wife killer. That was a set-up.

These are people representing the white cause in the US that consists of talking about immigration and complaining about Jews. Lol!

“complaining”, as if its trivial - what a jew you are.

They aren’t complaining about immigration and jews, they are noting a blockage to our sovereignty and a deliberately imposed threat to our survival.

Perhaps instead of bitching and moaning about Jews, WW2, “white genocide”, etc. all the arm chair warriors who couldn’t even be bothered to attend the conference in Hungry encase it got banned actually got physically politically active perhaps they might have achieved something.
http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/09/budapest-conference-update/

You think we should have gone to Hungary? It must have been a good thing to Not do. According to you we should vote for Republican neo cons and your Jewish war complex.

Go to hell.

Posted by jamesUK on Fri, 06 Feb 2015 01:37 | #

@DanielS

You don’t even try to camouflage your trolling. Everyone knows wikipedia is a Jewish controlled operation. Just try changing any article that has to do with pro White interests or a pro White personage and it will very quickly be returned to smear and negative spin.

I was blocked from submitting an article on the obvious phenomenon of “mulatto supremacism.” It even has notable historical precedent in Haiti.

But the proof is to be found on videos which reveal Israeli boiler rooms - groups of people paid to spin wiki articles in a jewish way.

I don’t now what Wikipedia’s policy is on creating entries on its site so I can’t comment on that it.

Where are the videos? I heard of Jewish commentators on YouTube like to Israel but not Wikipedia.

Well, you are wrong and not worth arguing with.

Seeing how it is an opinion either way there is not much to discuss.

You don’t get to say who is represented by them. They represent themselves, or anybody who wants to be represented by them, which is not us.

I don’t but they do running on an openly white political agenda and members of openly pro-white organisations for decades.

Steele was not a would-be wife killer. That was a set-up.

Facts say otherwise hence his conviction.

“complaining”, as if its trivial - what a jew you are.

Not Jewish but it is like Blacks complaining about racism with problems in there own community.

They aren’t complaining about immigration and jews, they are noting a blockage to our sovereignty and a deliberately imposed threat to our survival.

Apart from the US other western countries especially Eastern Europe do not have significant immigration to come anywhere near close to threatening the actual survival of the host countries that as I said before most are economic migrants from new EU countries. 

You think we should have gone to Hungary?

Yes that admittedly some did and got media attention that the few media outlets that covered it admitted it looked favourable towards the organisers on the issue of free speech.   

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/07/american-racist-richard-spencer-gets-to-play-the-martyr-in-hungary.html

It must have been a good thing to Not do. According to you we should vote for Republican neo cons and your Jewish war complex.

Go to hell.

I said you should have went that I don’t know how you come to the conclusion that I support Neocons or the military industrial complex.

 

Posted by jamesUK on Fri, 06 Feb 2015 01:52 | #

I forgot to check my comment before posting it so there are a few mistakes that need correction.

I don’t now what Wikipedia’s policy is on creating entries on its site so I can’t comment on that.

Where are the videos? I heard of Jewish commentators on YouTube linked to Israel but not Wikipedia.

I don’t but they do run on an openly white political agenda and are members of openly pro-white organisations for decades.

Posted by DanielS on Fri, 06 Feb 2015 03:18 | #

See answer in next comment - response to Jewish troll JamesUK

Posted by ResponsetoJewishtrollJamesUK on Fri, 06 Feb 2015 04:30 | #

Posted by jamesUK on February 05, 2015, 08:37 PM | #

@DanielS
  I was blocked from submitting an article on the obvious phenomenon of “mulatto supremacism.” It even has notable historical precedent in Haiti.

  But the proof is to be found on videos which reveal Israeli boiler rooms - groups of people paid to spin wiki articles in a jewish way.

JamesUK
I don’t now what Wikipedia’s policy is on creating entries on its site so I can’t comment on that it.

Where are the videos? I heard of Jewish commentators on YouTube like to Israel but not Wikipedia.

It is so basically factual to anyone who has had dealings with Wikipedia and White activism that I am not even obligated to make the case as a public service; I will leave you to that secretarial detail rather than getting caught up in your game of arguing over the obvious.

I will provide just one example of that which you act as if difficult to find - a ready example of a Jewish Wikipedia manipulation center:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMBramnCg_s

DanielS
Well, you are wrong and not worth arguing with.
JamesUK
Seeing how it is an opinion either way there is not much to discuss.

DanielS
Well that’s it. You want to bring into question the obvious. That may show a dull chutzpah but it is only a tedious obstruction as it will not yield significantly new information - there is no scarcity of evidence to the contrary of your position.

You don’t get to say who is represented by them (Duke and Black). They represent themselves, or anybody who wants to be represented by them, which is not in all ways us.

JamesUK
I don’t but they do run on an openly white political agenda and are members of openly pro-white organisations for decades.

DanielS
They are not the only ones who care about European people and not comprehensively representative.

  Steele was not a would-be wife killer. That was a set-up.

JamesUK
Facts say otherwise hence his conviction.

DanielS
On the contrary. These are the facts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1NG07kU8to Facts say that he was set up. A handyman (Larry Fairfax) that Steele hired to help around his property was a federal informant hired to set him up on the charge of murder for hire of his wife for her insurance. His wife, Cindy, didn’t have insurance. A tape was fabricated to allege his having solicited the hit on Cindy for her insurance money. Audio experts were blocked by the (corrupt) judge from testifying as such.

What motive was there for Steele to kill his wife for insurance money that did not exist? On the other hand, if you listen to or read Steele’s, “In defense of anti semitism” (the text is in comment #5 above though the link to the site where the audio and text were is no longer available - I wonder why?), there was plenty of motive for Jewish interests silence Steele.

You say WN are “complaining”, as if its trivial - what a jew you are.

JamesUK
Not Jewish but it is like Blacks complaining about racism with problems in there own community.

You are doing the bidding of Jews at any rate. We are not “like blacks complaining about racism” around here. At MR we survey all concerns - centering on our own human ecological systems first and attending to problems and antagonists as they emerge relevant. Jews happen to be salient among antagonists in their genetic pattern and in 7 power points.

WN aren’t complaining about immigration and jews, we are noting a blockage to our sovereignty, destruction of our well being and even a deliberately imposed threat to our survival.

JamesUK
Apart from the US other western countries especially Eastern Europe do not have significant immigration to come anywhere near close to threatening the actual survival of the host countries that as I said before most are economic migrants from new EU countries.

DanielS
“Apart from the US and other western countries” .... a ‘little thing’ like The US and Western nations being destroyed. We’re supposed to shrug that off, right?

JamesUK
“especially Eastern Europe do not have significant immigration to come anywhere near close to threatening the actual survival”

DanielS
Even if we were so crass, indignant, egregious as to not care about western European nations and if the western countries were to go under then eventually the eastern countries would be submerged in spill over tides of non-Whites as well. And you know it dirt bag.

JamesUK
most are economic migrants from new EU countries.

DanielS
You want Europeans to fight eachother, like good right wingers, don’t you?

You think we should have gone to Hungary?

It must have been a good thing to Not do. According to you we should vote for Republican neo cons and your Jewish war complex.

Go to hell.

JamesUK

I said you should have went that I don’t know how you come to the conclusion that I support Neocons or the military industrial complex.

Yes that admittedly some did and got media attention that the few media outlets that covered it admitted it looked favourable towards the organisers on the issue of free speech. 

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/07/american-racist-richard-spencer-gets-to-play-the-martyr-in-hungary.html

DanielS
That conference was too right-wing reactionary and plays into the hands of how Jews would like us to be - the Dugins, the Jared Taylors, the scary scientistic factualizing to turn-off normal people.. .

Posted by Thunder on Sat, 07 Feb 2015 22:39 | #

This is all so depressing. is it inevitable? Is there any hope on the horizon? Is there anything effective I can do? Please cheer me up. I look at my children and fear for the future.

Posted by Chasing down last Swedish enclaves on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 10:46 | #

Swedish integration minister will chase down White areas by law
by Steve Goode • February 8, 2015

http://whitegenocideproject.com/

Ylva Johansson, Swedish integration minister, has announced a new law that will deliberately move new immigrants into “low immigrant” (majority White) areas, instead of putting them in “high immigrant” (non-White) areas.

Back in October 2014, the Swedish Migration Board announced that it would have no problem breaking the law in order to do this; now it seems they will have the consent of the law.

“All municipalities should take in refugees“, Johansson said, “The distribution [of non-White immigrants] is unreasonable. We need to make changes in the law for everyone to take responsibility”

“We need legislative changes to ensure that all local authorities take responsibility for refugee protection”

“Other EU countries must take greater responsibility. But I do not want to achieve it by making it more difficult or worse for people to come to Sweden.”

Anti-Whites love to position themselves as the defenders of refugees and non-Whites against the “evil racist White majority”, but why exactly are they kicking up a stink about “distribution” of immigrants?

Simple: if you were allow these non-White immigrants to choose what part of the country they would go to, most of them would, and do, choose the cities. What you end up with is majority non-White cities and majority White suburbs/towns.

This is not what they want; in their mind an all White area – by accident or by design – is the ultimate sin, and the final solution to being “too White” is forced “diversity”.

This forced “diversity” is a thinly veiled program of White genocide, and we will shout it from the rooftops.

...............................................................................................

“People like the idea of diversity. They just don’t like being around different people,”
by Steve Goode • January 23, 2015

LifeWay Research, based in Nashville, Tennessee, has completed a series of studies looking into “diversity” in church.

According to the results, 37% of White people said they wanted their church to be more diverse. 47% of Hispanics, and 51% of Blacks agreed with more “diversity”.

When all groups were taken into account, 67% said their church is “diverse” enough, with less than half (40%) wanting to see more. The results also found 2 out of 3 do not regularly go to a church where they are the minority.

An unconnected study found recently that non-White groups tend to think of “diversity” as meaning more of their own group, which could explain this study’s results.

The people who conducted the study seem a little upset that only 40% wanted more “diversity”.

“People like the idea of diversity. They just don’t like being around different people,” said Ed Stetzer, executive director of LifeWay Research.

Stetzer’s observation is confirmed by numerous studies.

“Maybe their sense is that church is the space where they don’t have to worry about issues like this,”

“If you don’t like diversity, you’re really not going to like heaven.”

The word “diversity” gets thrown around a lot, but in politics it has a very specific meaning: it means minority White. If you don’t support this, you will usually see the words “racist”, “bigot”, “nazi”, etc thrown at you as well.

These anti-Whites might as well be screaming “you’re a big meanie!”, but now we must move on to the main point here.

This is White Genocide simply because when they open the borders and call for more “diversity” (less Whites), they are putting in place conditions which lead to our demise.

That’s genocide in a nutshell.

 

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:16 | #

Tanstaafl critiques “White pathology and becoming like the enemy”

The “White pathology’ argument is a favorite of Tim Wise . I’ll leave it to WN’s who use this term to wonder why they share the term with him.

“Monocausalism’ (Coined by someone upset with Tan’s critique of the ‘suicide meme’) - it is another way of saying ‘anti-Semitism’; more psycho-analysis.

It’s stupid and crazy to find fault with Jews.

Thus, Jews cultivate a truly pathological fear that siding with our race wholeheartedly is stupid or crazy.

Instead we are encouraged to do something truly stupid or insane, that is blame our own race. Not ourselves personally, mind you. They appeal to self esteem as opposed to group esteem - our poor race is ill but not us enlightened individuals.”

http://age-of-treason.com/2015/02/10/fear-and-genocide/

An interesting new point that Tan makes is here:

“The next fallback for Jews to prevent Whites from consciously recognizing the pathogen of Jewish parasitism is to say there is a danger of Whites becoming just like the Jews, as bad as the Jews. The host will become the parasite? It is based on the same trick upon which Boasianism is based, that our genetics are superficial, plastic and infinitely malleable. “

This is in the realm of a critique that I have submitted to James Bowery regarding his concern that Whites may be transformed into eusocial organisms - here.

Tan goes on to contend - “we will become like the parasites? How will that be worse than blaming ourselves into extinction?”

Now, eusociality is not wholly the same as parasitism, but the argument of “becoming like the enemy” IS James’ fundamental concern.

I believe James would counter that we might lose that which makes us European, our northern individualism lost in the matrix of civilization and eusocial reaction - e.g, in being herded into collective war headlong, destroyed running after the red cape of Jews collective game.

However, while I do think these scenarios which James is concerned to anticipate are possible, and should be taken into account, with a well conceived battle strategy they are not an overriding matter.

Posted by Morgoth on Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:21 | #

The police have raided the only charity to help English people exclusively and it looks like there’s a tv show coming up to follow:

This worthy activity carried out by the Trust is under a sustained attack by the Metropolitan Police. This included a raid on the family homes of two of the Trustees last month. 15 heavy handed police officers took part in each raid and personal items such as mobile phones, computers, printers and routers were seized. The Trustees were taken in for questioning and we understand that the nature of the interviews by the Met officers was truly bizarre and included questions suggesting that anyone interested in early English history and culture is an “extremist”. Authoritative historical works by scholars such as Tony Linsell and Stephen Pollington were cited as “encouraging extremism”.

The Trustees have not been charged with any offence but are on strict bail conditions preventing them undertaking any work on behalf of the charity and restricting their personal movements.

In addition the Met are now actively contacting hundreds of donors and Friends of the Trust. For many Friends and supporters this will be a humiliating and distressful activity, but as the Trust has not broken any laws there should be nothing to fear. It is recommended that a simple, polite and sustained “no comment” to any questions posed by investigating officers is made. Always seek professional legal advice if you have any concerns and submit formal complaints against officers who are abusive, aggressive and who utter racist comments.

It is believed that the Met’s investigation into the finances of the Trust has arisen from an approach made by an individual in 2014 who expressed an interest in the Trust and its work and befriended some its Trustees and donors. However the individual turned out to be a sneak reporter working for Hardcash Productions; a London based documentary production company. The desperately pathetic attempts to smear and ultimately seek to have the Trust deregistered as a charity, as a result of the “undercover” work are planned to be broadcast on ITV next week. The documentary unoriginally untitled “Charities Behaving Badly” goes out on ITV Weds 18th February 10.40pm

It is not a crime to make donations to the Trust and in solidarity with the Trust we would encourage our readers to make a contribution here.

http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=2073

Posted by Femen: Boobs and Rich Jews on Fri, 13 Feb 2015 03:04 | #

Femen: Boobs and Rich Jews

http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/femen-boobs-and-rich-jews.html#more

Posted by History of Jihad on Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:13 | #

Bill Warner on the history of Jihad against Europeans and Europeans astounding head in the sand response:

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio3fourteen/2015/R314-150211.php

Change:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVa-3xmwTRA

Posted by Walter Dennis: White inspiration on Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:06 | #

TT features and inspiring speech by Walter Dennis (min. 11.00 to 42.20), highly recommended listening for White inspiration:

http://www.resist.com/war_network/radio_station/war_radio_2015/20150409.mp3