Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:19 | #
Of course what neither Alan Greenspan nor Kathleen Newland will discuss is that the problem isn’t inequality of wages but inequality of wealth. The New Deal was all about nationalizing the labor union movement—moving the “picket line” to the US border so “scabs” and “immigrant” became basically synonymous—in such a way that a conversion from taxing economic activity to taxing wealth could be avoided. FDR went so far as to adopt every single plank in Norm Thomas’s socialist platform except THE WEALTH TAX. He then proceeded to put through an income tax hike that he called “The Wealth Tax”.
This con game, in combination with WW II, post-poned the day of reckoning for the wealthy—until they, through “liberalized” immigration, broke the National Union formed by the New Deal.
Guys like Greenspan want to pretend they’re on the side of “justice” and they aren’t even on the side of economic justice for a very simple reason:
The primary service provided by government is the infrastructure required to support property rights that would not exist in the absence of government.
That means government is properly funded from a use fee for those property rights that would not exist in the absence of government—aka WEALTH TAX.
Not even libertarians can make an intellectually honest argument against this without basically arguing that government shouldn’t exist.
Peter Laufer’s explosive proposals for the U.S.-Mexican border go far beyond President Bush’s initiative to ease restrictions on immigration. Mr. Laufer argues that the border with Mexico should be completely open, with a free flow of people between the two countries. He offers a step-by-step blueprint for making it happen. [...]
That’s like the termites offering a step-by-step blueprint for how best to treat the wooden beams holding up your house.
Hey, how come he doesn’t offer a step-by-step blueprint for opening Israel’s borders? If it’s so great, couldn’t Israel benefit from doing it? I admit that’s a real head-scratcher but there must be an answer ... Wait, could it have any relation to Alon Ziv’s wanting all Euros to marry Negroes but not all Israeli and diaspora Jews to marry them? Wow ... that’s a hard one ... Do I get more time to think or must I answer right this second? ... I need more time ... (Hey don’t laugh. It’s a hard question!)
______
Peter Laufer is co-producer of the documentary film Exodus to Berlin, which was awarded the David Wolper Prize and is distributed by the National Center for Jewish Film at Brandeis University [...] After the Berlin Wall fell, the German government invited Soviet-bloc Jews to immigrate to Germany. The fastest growing Jewish community in the world is now Germany. Producers Jeff Kamen and Peter Laufer document this ironic reality and the concurrent rise of neo-Nazi violence.
But Jews shouldn’t be immigrating in large numbers to Germany or to any Euro country, and the reason is no sooner do they settle in large numbers than they start methodically destroying the foundations of that country they way termites destroy the foundations of a house. If what makes Euros happy in society makes Jews miserable (reasonable immigration policies, public celebration of Christmas, and various other kinds of normalness) and what makes Jews happy makes Euros miserable (race-replacement immigration, suppression of the public celebration of Christmas, and various other kinds of abnormalness) why should the two live together in the same country? The answer is they shouldn’t. Because of the unacceptable things they do once settled in Euro countries in large numbers (essentially, they try to do the country to death in a thousand ways) Jews shouldn’t be permitted to settle in Euro countries in appreciable numbers. These Jews coming into Germany shouldn’t be allowed in. If the Germans make the mistake of letting them in, this is the sort of pure misery, abmormalness, and sickness they’re going to saddle the next generation of Germans with, because once in a Euro country in significant numbers the Jews can’t help themselves — the following is simply the kind of stuff they do and no one as of yet knows how to make them stop:
It is entirely reasonable, based on the historical evidence, to view the following as resulting, at least in part, from the Jewish extended phenotype at work in America: the “civil rights” movement, resulting in forced racial integration, anti-White quotas, school busing, “equal opportunity” and housing laws, and the resultant damage to our schools and standards, destruction of neighborhoods and cities, and countless thousands of Euro-American victims of ethnic minority violence; the 1965 change in our immigration laws, which continues to flood America with non-European immigrants, and which will result in minority status for Euro-Americans in several decades; the feminist movement, which has caused gender hostility between male and female Euro-Americans, and has resulted in an increased divorce and abortion rate, and a decreased birthrate among Euro-Americans; miscegenation between Euro-Americans and other racial groups, vigorously promoted by the media, which further reduces Euro-American numbers while damaging our genetic inheritance; the anti-(Vietnam) war movement, which created an atmosphere of cynicism, generational conflict, and defeatism in the American public; the “counter-culture,” helped along by the Frankfurt School,” which has assailed traditional Euro-American values, damaged our culture, and created feelings of alienation, particularly among the young; “white guilt,” which leads our people, again particularly the young, to doubt their own worth and to reject their history, with devastating consequences; the prevalence of the denial of race and racial differences, which distorts science in an attempt to convince peoples of European descent that since their race really doesn’t exist, then nothing is being lost as their population group hurtles to extinction; and a war against free speech which is making America more and more a gulag of political correctness.
4
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:25 | #
Notice the three Jewish women in the photo at the top of the home page: they’re not diverse enough. Aren’t the Jews always telling us we need to stop being so racist and start being more diverse? How come that doesn’t apply to them? In that photo there should be one Jewish woman, one Bantu woman, and one Oriental woman. At least that’s the way Michael Eisner, who is a Jewish diversity advocate, runs the Walt Disney company. Do the rules Jews set for us (ram down our throats, actually) somehow break down when applied to them?
5
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:57 | #
Harpending: Human RACES More Differentiated Than Animal Breeds/Subspecies (item from the log entry)
An article about Koko the gorilla claims individuals of that species typically score between 75 and 90 on IQ tests. If true, what does that say about humans and human groups who score in that range? (Or, conversely, what does it say about gorillas?) (Hat tip to The Civic Platform)
6
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:44 | #
“An article about Koko the gorilla claims individuals of that species typically score between 75 and 90 on IQ tests.” (—my comment directly above)
Look at the following:
Tetsuro Matsuzawa, a Kyoto primatologist, described a young chimp watching as numbers 1 through 9 flashed on the computer screen at random positions. Then the numbers disappeared in no more than a second. White squares remained where the numbers had been. The chimp casually but swiftly pressed the squares, calling back the numbers in ascending order—1, 2, 3, etc. The test was repeated several times, with the numbers and squares in different places. The chimp, which had months of training accompanied by promised food rewards, almost never failed to remember where the numbers had been. The video included scenes of a human failing the test, seldom recalling more than one or two numbers, if any. “Humans can’t do it,” Dr. Matsuzawa said. “Chimpanzees are superior to humans in this [cognitive] task.”
Hmm the above post is a nice n informative one, So does that mean, Chimps generation is progressing so much that they are gonn outperform humans one day?
Passing a test that humans failed is a great thing, yet i think its wayy to go..
Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:19 | #
Of course what neither Alan Greenspan nor Kathleen Newland will discuss is that the problem isn’t inequality of wages but inequality of wealth. The New Deal was all about nationalizing the labor union movement—moving the “picket line” to the US border so “scabs” and “immigrant” became basically synonymous—in such a way that a conversion from taxing economic activity to taxing wealth could be avoided. FDR went so far as to adopt every single plank in Norm Thomas’s socialist platform except THE WEALTH TAX. He then proceeded to put through an income tax hike that he called “The Wealth Tax”.
This con game, in combination with WW II, post-poned the day of reckoning for the wealthy—until they, through “liberalized” immigration, broke the National Union formed by the New Deal.
Guys like Greenspan want to pretend they’re on the side of “justice” and they aren’t even on the side of economic justice for a very simple reason:
The primary service provided by government is the infrastructure required to support property rights that would not exist in the absence of government.
That means government is properly funded from a use fee for those property rights that would not exist in the absence of government—aka WEALTH TAX.
Not even libertarians can make an intellectually honest argument against this without basically arguing that government shouldn’t exist.