Obama in Philly

Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 23 October 2008 16:05.

The Philadelphia Daily News, a struggling tabloid owned by the Catholic, former Bush publicist Brian Tierney, has managed to inform its - as Bo and Stanley would say - diverse white American readership that they or their cousins are “crackers”.  Here’s the offending extract from John Baer’s column on Tuesday:-

I think McCain’s camp is banking on Pennsylvania’s “cracker factor.”

I think the campaign believes the Democratic view - expressed by Ed Rendell last winter and Jack Murtha last week (and James Carville 22 years ago) - that there are racist tendencies among Pennsylvania voters.

Think about it.

Rendell in February said, “There are some whites who are probably not ready to vote for an African-American candidate.”

He even put a point spread on it, saying that being black in Pennsylvania costs a candidate 5 percentage points.

Murtha, a veteran Johnstown congressman, last week said, “There’s no question that western Pennsylvania is a racist area.”

He put the black penalty at 4 percentage points.

These guys are among the state’s most successful, longest- serving politicians: Rendell has been in office 22 years and is a former national party chairman; Murtha has been in Congress 34 years.

(Carville in 1986 famously said everything between Philly and Pittsburgh is “Alabama without black people,” which today insults Alabama; it has four times more black elected officials than Pennsylvania, according to U.S. Census data.)

So, if you take the most recent polling - an Allentown Morning Call poll Sunday is reflective of others and puts Obama 12 points up, 52-40 - I figure McCain’s folks figure, well, heck, that’s really only 7 points and since most polls have a 3-point margin of error, maybe just 4 points, and that puts us right in the game.

Meanwhile, McCain’s campaign, in TV ads and on the stump, is calling Obama’s tax- cut proposal a “government handout” and “welfare.” McCain yesterday said it’s “just another government giveaway.”

Whom do you think that’s aimed at?

Oh, I don’t know, maybe lower-income, less-educated white voters for whom “welfare” and “government giveaway” means black people?

So how did that go down?  Do Bo and Stanley have a point?  A considerable majority of the 294 comments says they do.  Here is a selection of the later ones:-

Posted by BobbyD 06:05 AM, 10/21/2008
I voted for Michael Nutter, and Lynn Swann. I’m voting for John McCain on November 4th. Does that make me a racist cracker? So if you don’t vote for Obama you’re a racist?

Posted by janet123 07:10 AM, 10/21/2008
The racist factor is that more than 90% of blacks are voting for Obama. Why is that not the racism that is reported? I am originally from Western PA, and it is less racist than Philadelphia. Is there a point to this article, or is it just to promote racial harmony?

Posted by Simon 07:49 AM, 10/21/2008
I like how this paper is totally comfortable printing “cracker factor” but if they ever did the “black” equivalent there would be riots in the street and they’d probably try and burn down city hall. Double standards fill me with hate.

Posted by daddyimscared 07:52 AM, 10/21/2008
I say AGAIN>.. why is it when a white doesn’t vote for a black candidate it is called “racism” but when 98% of blacks vote for a black candidate instead of any other candidate it is called “unity” and consider a good thing? The double standard astounds me! I am reminded almost daily by articles like this that have no reservation about calling white people “crackers” and assuming that “lower income, less educated” white people are all racist why I no longer suscribe to this rag! This paper does a disservice to the community with articles like this. It can’t go out of business fast enough for me!

Posted by utleyrules 07:56 AM, 10/21/2008
My God enough with this nonsense, liberal reporting is out of control. 90% of blacks are voting for Obama yet I have not seen one article about black racism. Racism goes BOTH ways just hang around Philly for a few days and you will see it. Obama is leading yet white liberals still are talking about white racism.

Posted by xstewart4 08:00 AM, 10/21/2008
John Baer is the racist here.

Posted by lonewolf 08:01 AM, 10/21/2008
it’s time the ‘crackers’ to come out in force on nov 4th,and vote for the only qualified candidate in the race.

Posted by htown reader 08:06 AM, 10/21/2008
What a pathetic job of editing! What genius of an editor decided that a column calling white people “crackers” was worthy of printing? The paper is going in the toilet…

Posted by jbruder02 08:10 AM, 10/21/2008
So apparently the word “cracker” is fine not only to say publicly to a white person but it’s also alright to put it in print now? Could this article be written with the “N” word and used as a reason African American’s are voting for Obama? Nope because that word isn’t allowed to be said but “cracker” is, somehow that makes sense to someone, there is no double standard here for sure. Also why isn’t an article written about why African Americans not only may actually vote for a President (which is a story in itself) but probably 95% of them will be voting for Obama. What a coincidence. They must really like his policies and stance on the important issues facing the country these days. The Daily News should do a poll around North Philly to see who they are going to vote for and why. An overwhelming majority will say Obama and have no good reason other than the fact that he’s black.

Posted by goJ0E v2.0 08:18 AM, 10/21/2008
I’m white. I don’t hunt. I don’t like NASCAR. I graduated from two nationally recognized universities and hold a masters degree in a non-arts discipline. I’m voting for John McCain. Does that make me a “cracker?”

Posted by Tango 08:27 AM, 10/21/2008
There sure are racist tendencies in PA, just take a look at the right-wing comments on this site on a daily basis. There are a lot of scared little white people. I wonder…is it racist for white people to vote for McCain because he’s white and so are they? In fact, I wonder if our country isn’t completely racist considering white people have voted for white presidents since 1789. (I’m white btw).

Posted by Scooterlicious 08:28 AM, 10/21/2008
On Cracker Factor: no surprises here. This is exactly what you can expect from the Daily News.

Posted by KeepsItReal 08:35 AM, 10/21/2008
Wow. This article is the most offensive peice of garbage I have ever read. Unbelievable. Who runs this paper? The Black Panthers?


Posted by bleedinggreen 08:42 AM, 10/21/2008
I’ll never buy another DN.

Posted by Bella316 08:49 AM, 10/21/2008
I am highly offended by his “cracker factor” column. Maybe we just don’t agree with Obama - like on his abortion-on-demand stance.

Posted by NJA 09:03 AM, 10/21/2008
If white people are “crackers”, why are white European-Americans the only voting bloc to NOT vote based on racial lines, I believe African-Americans will vote for Obama with over 95 percentage.

Posted by goJ0E v2.0 09:05 AM, 10/21/2008
Tango - you are a complete disgrace to humanity. You say “I wonder if our country isn’t completely racist considering white people have voted for white presidents since 1789. (I’m white btw).” Why didn’t black people find America? Why weren’t there black presidents in 1789? What I’m about to say may shock you to the bone. I may make you tremble that such words could be typed at all. Are you ready for them? Here they are: It wasn’t in nature’s plan for evolution. All races weren’t created equal. Some are stronger. Some are smarter. Deal with it, rather than make excuses and unfounded claims of racism. Your argument is based on fallacy. It’s like saying that the “native American Indians were racist since non of their chiefs were white.” Don’t hold it against the Caucasian races that they were leaders in science, exploration, democracy, the arts, and virtually everything that you have today. Likewise, I’ll refrain from listing the contributions that Africans have given the world, if you get my point. It’s acceptable to be white, despite what you may think.

Posted by jn3 09:05 AM, 10/21/2008
WOW. This article is a racist article if I ever saw one. I guess it is ok in print to now call blacks N*****. Cracker is a racially offensive term towards whites by blacks but this paper deems it ok to print? John Baer should be fired. Don Imus was fired for using a racially insensitive remark so should he. We all know he won’t be because it is ok to use racial terms, discriminate against, and phyically attack whites, none of these are racial. A black aid uses KKK against a white, and her boss backs her. Someone writes KKK on a street and it is a racial crime. WHY. Because of articles like this. Fire John Baer now.

Posted by Smedkus 09:06 AM, 10/21/2008
oh great, why is it okay to say that, but not okay to say Obama is being elected by the “n-trigger” . What a messed up apologist world.

Posted by Smedkus 09:06 AM, 10/21/2008
oh great, why is it okay to say that, but not okay to say Obama is being elected by the “n-trigger” . What a messed up apologist world.

Posted by goJ0E v2.0 09:18 AM, 10/21/2008
Tango - maybe it’s because you feel that racism is a one-way street and that blacks are incapable of being racist. News flash: 96% of blacks are voting for Obama.

Posted by KJ256 09:24 AM, 10/21/2008
I find this appalling that John Baer would use the term “cracker” It’s absolutely disgusting.

Posted by jbruder02 09:24 AM, 10/21/2008
Don Imus was fired why shouldn’t this “writer” be fired? Oh wait I know why there is a double standard in this country and it’s ridiculous.

Posted by goJ0E v2.0 09:25 AM, 10/21/2008
Since the webmaster refuses to allow the N-word to be posted, here’s my watered-down post, in hopes that it passes the non-tolerance screen: Very offensive choice of words. I’m extremely outraged that the word “cracker” has been deemed acceptable to print. To prove my point, would it be fair to run a similar piece titled “Is Obama banking on the ‘n****r factor’ in Pa.?”

Posted by JGD84 09:28 AM, 10/21/2008
This is one of the most outrageous articles I’ve ever seen in a Philadelphia newspaper in my 42 years in and around the city. John Baer is a disgrace! People have been working for YEARS to stop race baiting and eliminate racially charged language and in 2008 John Baer decides to write about the ‘cracker factor’?!?! Newsflash to John… ALL PEOPLE have the capacity to hate! Sadly, people like Rev. Al Sharpton (among others!) are trying to stop people from using the “N” word… and for good reason… inflamatory language only polarizes. I’m embarrassed for this website and the newspaper John Baer writes for… and if the management team doesn’t have the intestinal fortitude to fire or fine a guy like this, print media DESERVES to go away!!!

Posted by wood_yee 09:35 AM, 10/21/2008
A double standard does not exist. Unity, when describing 98% of blacks voting black, is a comfort term. It is very important that the children receive positive reinforcement on a consistent basis – destroy schools, give more money. Murder, blame the guns. Rampant idiocy, blame racist curriculum. If one starts calling it what it is, thus, agitating the children, image what the cost will be to rebuild the torched neighborhoods. Term-substitution is an acceptable solution when the probability of riotous behavior is greater than 98%.

... and so on.  Everything is there, really.  The wisdom of the crowd, as far as it goes.

The interesting thing about it is that the emotive power at work here is the sense of injustice.  These people feel that they have done what was asked of them, and paid their dues towards the kind of society they were told must be built.  But it’s not enough.  It’s never enough.  The world won’t leave them alone, won’t stop telling them they are illegitimate human beings.  And the reason?  Because they are white.  There is no other.

And this in a country whose entire political ethos has been built on the myths of the free individual and boundless progress!  It is not the America of freedom and opportunity they thought they knew.  It is an America that is institutionally hostile to them, and over which they have no control.  A default vote for McCain is precisely an acknowledgement that they have no control.

The black racial injustice that was used to extract a tribute in guilt from white America pays no returns beyond a certain point.  If we are not already beyond that point, we will be if and when the golden couple take up residence in the White House, and Oprah moves into her new office overlooking Grosvenor Square.  Obama‘s presidency, the product of a wave of staggering electoral naivety, will signal that the due-paying is done.  But the allegations of racism and the demands for white obeisance, the affirmative action, the liberal speech code will go on.  They will only engender more of the anger and bitterness evident in the Philadelphia Daily News thread.  And if that is indeed the case, Obama’s presidency will mark the moment when racial injustice became the dominant characteristic of American society, felt by black and white alike.

One can’t help but wonder whether the Establishment has got its timing wrong and promoted a black to the presidency a generation too early.  It may be the best possible development for a white America that has been supine and somnulent for far too long.

What a pity it doesn’t have a vehicle of political protest.



Comments:


1

Posted by the Narrator.. on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:18 | #

One can’t help but wonder whether the Establishment has got its timing wrong and promoted a black to the presidency a generation too early.  It may be the best possible development for a white America that has been supine and somnulent for far too long.
-Guessedworker

Tragically, I’ve come around to thinking the same. 
The current predicament of South African Whites is not encouraging, but then again America has about 187 million Whites at present ( a far larger percentage than SA had in 94), many of whom are growing increasingly perplexed (and irritated) as to why their belief in “judging the individual” is not being reciprocated by non-Whites.
It also seems to be dawning on a few of the slower ones that the tens of millions of immigrants (be they legal or not) flooding in are not here to “be Americans” but are, in fact, dramatically altering the economic, social and cultural realities of the United States.

Who Knows?

If blacks riot, rage and publicly refuse loyalty to a President Jaun McCain, should he win, and precede to “demonstrate” for the next 6 months, then the backlash from Whites will come anyway.
And with the economy in a downturn and both candidates pledging Amnesty, it should be a Win/Win situation for our side (should the worse-is-better philosophy hold true).

I do think it’s funny, and ironic, that the coming presidential term will end in 2012, when many people expect the world to end.

In one way or another, it may prove to be true.

It may see the official surrendering of Western Civilization or it may see the end of the current 60 year old regime of the multicult…


2

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:07 | #

“Carville in 1986 famously said everything between Philly and Pittsburgh is ‘Alabama without black people,’ which today insults Alabama; it has four times more black elected officials than Pennsylvania, according to U.S. Census data.”  (—from the log entry)

That part of Pennsylvania sounds like a god damned good place to move to.


3

Posted by Bo on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:47 | #

The use by left-wing racialists of slurs and stereotypes to demean and silence the diverse white American peoples has been a successful technique. Under the guise of a campaign to elevate a person of both African and European continental origins to the premier office in the USA, the top has been blown of this usual and normal technique, and made the subject of more or less regular news comment.

From Susan Sontag (“cancer”) to DeeDee Myers (Clinton’s PR person, “racist whites), we have long known about the name-calling but having it come from the campaign and/or administration of what is popularly labeled an African American will stick in the craw of many more white Americans than when tossed out by those who look like us.

The family party that specialized in denigrating white Americans is about to come to a screeching halt when the old technique of slurs and stereotypes is used to silence us. The outcome may be even more virulent than that. White Americans may have found it easy to swallow the lies of Woodrow Wilson (WW I), Franklin Roosevelt (WW II), Harry Truman (Vietnam), and the two Bushes (both Iraq wars) to vast damage to our genetic pool, but I’m not sure an African American Commander In Chief will arouse similar enthusiasm for pacifying Africa, or supporting Indian revolutions in South America.

White Americans will notice slanders emanating from a toxic Obama administration and will more noticeably decline to endorse global invasions, we believe.


4

Posted by Bo on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50 | #

Oops, Harry Truman was Korea. Sorry


5

Posted by Diamed on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:02 | #

I love pages of comments like these, outraged, aware, and unafraid.

How many whites are really racist and just pretending they aren’t?  According to who they go to church with, where they send their kids to school, the intermarriage rate, etc—-we can safely say 95%.

How many whites are not only racists, but racial supremacists who think blacks are inferior as a group?  Well, according to polls at least 40% believe blacks are dumber than whites, and we can guess all the rest just lied to the pollster and also believe it.

How many Americans are against illegal immigration?  80%.  How many are against legal immigration?  You can bet still the vast majority of whites!

How many whites are considering secession as a final solution to escape their black criminals and parasites?  20% according to recent polls.  This number will have to go up before America can be saved.

The wisdom of the crowd far exceeds the lies and fantasies painted by our elites.  Most people simply Have Not gone along with multiculturalism.  They do not follow the orders of their schools, their media, their businesses, their preachers or anyone.  They continue to avoid blacks, and yes even ‘hate’ blacks, with all their wits intact.  The problem is well off whites do not wish to rock the boat and so what can be borne, will be borne.  The one lie liberals have succeeded in foisting on the public is that violent separation and exclusion is worse than just living with black crime, hispanic immigration, minority welfare, jewish demonization, etc, etc.

The worse the better.  Sooner or later people will be suffering so much that violence will look better in comparison.  It’s true violence was never attempted in South Africa but they were only 10% of the population or so.  This time around we will still be 50%, 40%, or whatever.  Not only will violent revolution and exclusion be preferable to living with such awful neighbors, but people know they would win too.


6

Posted by byron on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:10 | #

That part of Pennsylvania sounds like a god damned good place to move to.

 

  I went to college in central Pennsylvania, at Bucknell University.  Nary a non-white to be seen once you got off campus.  The school struggles to recruit blacks for this reason.  Apparently it’s a big deal for blacks to have black barber shops in town that they can go to. 

  I had a Jewish professor tell us in class that he very nearly took a position at a lesser college because his colleagues at his previous school had tried to dissuade him from coming to Bucknell.  They had told him not to move to central Pennsylvania, it’s too white, there are neo-Nazi groups there, etc.  Now, I never saw any evidence of neo-Nazi groups, but the point is that it’s the type of area that would certainly raise the ire of a Jewish racist.  Just look at Phillip Roth’s fictionalized accounts of his college days.  Roth apparently hated his time at Bucknell.  Too white for him. 

  A normal white person like yourself would do well in that region.


7

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:30 | #

Byron, what does it tell us that Jews would far rather be surrounded by Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, Subcons, and Orientals than Euros?  They can’t stand places that are “too white.”  J, you out there?  Care to comment on this question?  Are we staring at an unbridgeable chasm?  I say yes, we’re staring into an unbridgeable chasm, and Euros and Jews should live in separate countries.  J has to agree, since he lives in and supports Israel rather than the States where he’s originally from.


8

Posted by Guest on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:56 | #

Fred you must remember this is a WAR OF EXTINCTION, genocide, being waged by World Jewry against the White race. When I look back on MacDonald’s CoC, how he mapped out this tenacious, relentless, HIVE activity it boggles the mind. One stands AWESTRUCK at the success of the Jewish community in eradicating the White race.
It appears that they have effectively won, and the last White will disappear this century.


9

Posted by jonathan on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:15 | #

I thought of BO yesterday having lunch with my new girlfriend’s male coworkers. To be expected we were having a bit of a cowboy showdown, and due to the MR influence I was overtly slipping in the race card. It’s totally justified, right? Obama against the ‘white male’ GOP thing and everything.

During the conversation, the ‘80s basketball player Larry Bird was referenced. So late last night, I was surfing the net and pounced on the Jewped..Wickipedia entry for Bird. I know it’s a small point, but I often think of BO’s white slurs. Mind you, Larry Bird, as you’ll see, was a great great player, YET, there is only one BOLDED phrase in this lengthy entry. (under the LEGACY part)—

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Bird

....like I later told my girlfriend, you’ll never see on the Alex Rodriguez page - “the spic who is Madonna’s latest stick.”


And can someone tell me, why is Obama always referred to as Black? Isn’t he just as much White? To be correct, shouldn’t ‘wE (and the Media) be calling him the Mulatto rather than the Messiah?

@byron - i saw R.E.M. at Bucknell in 1985. Sweet lush campus, from what I remember.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Bill White as Extended Phenotype
Previous entry: Nature on sociobiology and god

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:28. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 17:30. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:21. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:36. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:37. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:14. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:30. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:04. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Mon, 11 Nov 2024 23:12. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Mon, 11 Nov 2024 19:02. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Nationalism's ownership of the Levellers' legacy' on Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:11. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Fri, 08 Nov 2024 23:26. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Wed, 06 Nov 2024 18:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:48. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 12:19. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 04:15. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:57. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:40. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 01 Nov 2024 23:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:21. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Mon, 28 Oct 2024 23:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:28. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:27. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:37. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:54. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:23. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:19. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:59. (View)

affection-tone