The day they started talking Integration - Updated 15th June Today, the 14th June 2007, should go down in were inconveniently English. You can learn that and many other new Integration words here (PDF). It’s the final report of the The Commission on Integration and Cohesion, a fine body of superdiversity-loving, glocalists who have been meditating upon Our Shared Future. For that’s the title of their 168-page opus published today. It is a tour de farce of inclusion-speak, informed as it is by such One-Guardian-Buying-Man-Bands as multikulti.org, Clever Ted Cantle’s Institute of Community Cohesion, Big Wide Talk, One London, Clever Ted Cantle’s IDeA, and such luminaries as our old friends, Sir Keith Ajegbo and Clever Ted Cantle, and the altogether more formidable and dangerous Steve Vertovec. Now, it isn’t fair to ask you to wade through 168-pages of the direst, most self-deceiving drivel ever written by a man named Singh. So I’ve sort of speed-read it for you ... well, bits of it anyway. And here’s what I have learned. Whether we are black, white or Singh-coloured we are all British together and we going to stay that way - got it? And we all need to be helped by skilled mediators (that’s Integrationist for The Clever One) to understand our shared humanity and completely unexpected interest in chapati-baking. La la la. Dah doo ron ron. I also did a bit of searching through the pdf to see how my perpetually house-moving but, of course, integration-mad “group” can be described, should one ever wish to do so for some utterly unimaginable reason:- Indigenous - 0 results Native - 0 results English - 51 results, 50 of them about the learning of the English language. Generously, the other one says:-
So, no acknowledgement that an ancient people actually own these islands. Our “main ingredient” is that we speak a language everybody else can learn. And that’s all there is, really. Except for the “w” word ... White - 29 results, 16 of them referring to skin-colour. Yay ... in Integration-speak I am white. White I am. White. And white are we. As white as a white person who arrived in Southampton yesterday from Poland, or in London from Turkey, or in Slough from charming, gypsyless Slovakia. White, white, white. Yes, England was always a country of immigrants. Some of them as white as The Seven Sisters and old as the Henge. But so what? There is obviously nothing to stop us mutually-respecting, Pidgin English-speaking, glocalist, vibrant rainbow-Brits from doing just as the smiling Mr Singh and his cohesive friends desire. Tolerance here I come. Well, not quite. Because at 1 hour 40 minutes into today’s BBC Radio Five Live Matthew Bannister Show a 21-year old, hijab-wearing economic migrant and Respect member named Rania announced that the BNP must be banned from public life. Something to do with hate, apparently. Possibly because a remarkably tolerant Nick Griffin had just negotiated an hour-long interview by Bannister beforehand without a snag. You will enjoy listening to that more than wading through the Cohesion crap. Look out for Bannister’s friendly telephone interview with the frightful Prof Sally Tomlinson, a fluent speaker of the Integrationist tongue. UPDATE, 15th June The Daily Mail has produced a very helpful, quick-reference table that shows the direction this report recommends. The ineffable flimsyness of “Cohesion by Cantle-light” is plain for all to see:- The Ins English lessons: A seemingly solid proposal, but what is the proportion of “permanent” migrants who speak no English (ie, not itinerant and seasonal workers)? Is this largely code for Moslems? Don’t other factors reinforce Moslem exclusion? Citizenship ceremonies: Pure fluff. Citizenship GCSEs: Social engineering and mind control. A disgrace not in the tradition of English rights. Welcome Packs: Fluff. Contracts between migrants and localities: Meaning the migrants makes promises to a Town Hall employee to be very, very nice. Fluff. Community Day and Week: Double fluff. Myth-busting: The “myths” in question being about priority treatment for asylum-seekers. Just an attempt to throw the BNP a loop, and a hostage to fortune. Three paid days off work for community volunteers: Do-gooding at your employer’s expense. Fluff. Neighbourhood policing: Somali constables sent to vibrantly crime-fight in Solihull ... English constables sent to hideously do the same in Bordesley. Whatever happened to the old policing shibboleth that policeman must look like the people they police? And what if the Somalis aren’t up to standard? Superdiversity, meaning immigrants from many countries: Not a proposal, just an elite crime, indeed genocide - the drenching of England by every kind of foreign national. The Outs Translation: Want a bet? Money for groups, for example Somali women: Meaning that battered but vibrant Somali women will now be able to empathise with their battered English sisters in the same refuge, the presumption being that battered women have some purchase on the National Question. Who thinks up this stuff? Relying on equality laws and rules: So the admission is that racial equalitarianism cannot be regulated into existence. Time for Clever Ted to try socialising it. Social housing for exclusive groups: So now it’s coercing poor people who would rather live apart to live together. Shutting out existing residents from social housing: Surely, that’s a myth, isn’t it? I thought all that sort of thing was going to be “busted”. All-white councils: Name one. In “superdiverse” areas public sector employment is where the invaders go. As for electing them to serve as councillors, let the three main parties push the envelope as far as they can. It will only help the BNP. Censuses that miss out thousands of migrants: I certainly approve of accurate invader figures. Very useful to us. “Marginalisation” of settled white communities: Oh, thanks for thinking of us, Ted. But we already know we are on the way “out”. That’s the problem (not yours, of course - you’re Jewish). Institutional racism: The Mail means that blaming everything on the irredeemable sin of the English is “out”. But I’ve checked the report, and the word “institutional” does not appear, nor any reference to “racism” of that kind. Multiculturalism: No longer hip. Instead, the report uses what, obviously, its authors hope will become the new buzzword: superdiversity. A correct term would be: “English dispossession and marginalisation”, and that is not “out” at all. What this re-direction of the MultiCult is supposed to produce is this staggeringly naive vision of la-la land:-
Of course, no reason is given as to why this vision should come into being. Why is it better than an English England? No one on the Commission has troubled himself to get back to first principles. They just presume that English genocide is OK with us, and the only thing that matters is the removal of any obstruction to that. Buried away on page 104 is a single expression of the author’s interests:-
Everything flows from that. Comments:2
Posted by Anon on Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:13 | # Slightly off topic I’m afraid, I have just been looking at a picture of a coach load of Eastern Europeans unloading at Victoria coach station, which got me thinking. I note the MSM have evolved a strategy of treating EU migration separate and to the exclusion from other - this is interesting. It is clear EU migrant can be regarded with contempt, denigrated, scapegoated (Jobs) you name it, at the same time giving the silent treatment (as though it had ceased to exist) to the other. In other words, the focus on EU migrant has (suddenly) demonised EU immigration for Britain’s immigration woes. Am I on to something here or is it so transparent to be not worth mentioning? IMO, I think the scale of EU migration has skewed the whole immigration debate (for the time being) our government , not surprisingly has been knocked for six by the response of EU newcomers, what’s more, it doesnt look as if it is to subside anytime soon. I’m sure there must be more subtle connotations to the effects of continued large scale EU immigration to the whole debate - I’m getting vibes of unintended consequences. 3
Posted by gongstar on Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:56 | # “Cohesion by Cantle-light”—top Marx for that, GW! With Jews, Asians and their white collaborators leading the way to the sunlit uplands of Britain’s super-cohesive, super-integrative future, it would be a very CIC individual indeed who claimed that we’re actually wrapped in deep fog and heading towards the sound of waves on rocks drifting up from a long way below. Post a comment:
Next entry: We Shall Meet in the Temple of Silence
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Politics of Exclusion on Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:16 | #
GW is just going to love this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=462083&in_page_id=1770
Will English nationalists form “anti-hit squads” with the aim of _increasing_ tensions in troubled areas? I realize this may be difficult with the speech laws you have there (hint to Griffin and company: make those laws a priority of your “movement”), but still, there must be some room for maneuver.
Wherever racial tensions are brewing, heavy applications of salt must be rubbed in the wounds. Increased hostility and bitterness are good. Monkey wrench the multicultural machine.
This must be a cohesive strategy: one major short-term focus of English nationalism can be described as increasing and promoting racial tensions and suspicions in their nation.