The Paradoxes of Anti-Semitism

Posted by Guest Blogger on Thursday, 01 November 2007 09:21.

Tom Sunic has asked me to post his latest piece, which he describes as “very neutral”, and which appeared originally at David Duke’s site yesterday.

For the uninitiated, Tom is a New Right intellectual, the author of many articles on the future of European Man, and of two books - the latest of them, “Homo Americanus: Child of the postmodern age”, available at Amazon.

GW

Jews happen to enjoy a privileged place in the Western world, with their entire past portrayed as a story of suffering at the hands of their non-Jewish enemy. There are tons of well documented books on the psychology of Judaism, which also examine the genesis of the concept of anti-Semitism and its multiple verbal distortions in daily political discourse. The word “anti-Semitism,” unlike words “anticommunism,” or “antifascism,” does not reflect political beliefs or critical views of the Jews. This term is exclusively used as a lexical label to depict a person’s grave mental illness. As a perceived medical or judicial illness, anti-Semitism must never be debated; an anti-Semitic patient must not be a partner in scholarly duels; his sick views must not be the subject of academic inquiry and counter-inquiry. As an element of medical pathology, anti-Semitism must only by treated by doctors, preferably by Jewish psychoanalysts, or legally, by a prosecutor in court.

The word “anti-Semite” will likely be studied one day as a telling example of distorted political discourse, i.e. as a signifier for somebody who advocates the reign of demonology. “Many world-known Jewish authors, haunted by the either real or surreal specter of anti-Semitism, consider it a sickness, which enables them to avoid any form of introspection.” 1 How does one dare critically talk about the predominance of the Jews in America without running the risk of social opprobrium, or, as in Europe, of landing into jail? While it is a common place for the vast number of white Euro- Americans to crack jokes in private about Arabs, Mexicans, Africans, or for that matter deride their fellow Gentile citizens, without looking over their shoulder, a critical comment about the strong influence of Jews in America, even when that comment is founded on empirical facts, is viewed as a grave insult to Jews.2 If a serious European and American scholar or a politician ventures into this forbidden field, his gesture is interpreted as a sign of an agent provocateur, or worse, as a sign of somebody who decided to write his obituary. Such a schizophrenic climate of self-censorship in the West will sooner or later lead to dramatic consequences for both Jews and Gentiles. The lack of healthy dialogue can last for a century or so, but feigned conviviality between Euro-American Gentiles and Jews cannot last forever and remained based on distorted perceptions of the Other and how this Other should behave. Mendacity carries the germ of a civil war. The entire Western history, particularly since World War II, has abundantly proven that distorted self-perceptions, as well as the romanticized perception of the “Other,” if based on negative wishful thinking, lead to war and chaos. Eventually, both Jews and Euro-American Gentiles will be pitted into an ugly clash from which there will be no escape this time.

While many thinkers in the West unabashedly challenge modern myths and sport staggering erudition and courage in their demolition, the most sensitive point of reference of the twentieth century, i.e., the “Jewish question,” is carefully avoided. If the subject of Jews is mentioned in the European or America public forum, then it is usually in a laudatory fashion, which clearly indicates a morbid desire of white elites to curry favor with the Jews. The same individuals will be the first to declare themselves certified anti-Semites when an opportunistic moment becomes official enough for pogroms of Jews. It is the lack of open discussion about the topic of the Jews that confirms how Jews play a crucial role in the Western notion of the political. This is an additional sign of how past times interact with present times. Twentieth century experience with National Socialism serves as a powerful red flag in a political- semantic field that must be carefully trodden upon.

Christian Neurosis

But contrary to classical anti-Semitic arguments, strong Jewish influence in the West is not the product of Jews only; it is the logical result of Gentiles’ own acceptance of the Jewish founding myths that have seeped over centuries into Europe and America in their diverse Christian modalities. The current cultural and political ambiance coupled with strong self-censorship is just the latest secular version of this Judeo-Christian mindset. Hypothetically speaking, if Jews, by some miracle, were to play a marginal role in Europe or America - as they claim they do - then, logically, they would be the subject of a normal critical discussion or derision, just like other ethnic groups, races, or next door neighbors are. Blaming, however, Jews for extraterrestrial powers and their purported conspiracy to subvert Gentile culture borders on delusion and only reflects the absence of dialogue. This behavioral trait is particularly salient among white Christian Euro-Americans. Such delusions only provide legitimacy to Jews in their search for a real or surreal anti-Semitic boogieman around the corner. Without the specter of anti-Semitism, Jews would likely assimilate quickly and hence disappear. Thus, anti-Semitism provides Jews with alibis to project themselves as victims of Gentile prejudice. Consequently, it assigns them a role of posing as the sole educational super-ego for Euro- Americans and by proxy for the entire world. In his book on the social role of Jews, a prominent Jewish-French politician and author, Jacques Attali, writes: “As Russian Jews invented socialism, and as Austrian Jews invented psychoanalysis, American Jews in the forefront, participated in the birth of American capitalism and in the Americanization of the entire world.”3 For a Jewish author, like Attali, such a remark is easier to write down than for a Gentile thinker, who with the same comment, would be shouted down as an “anti-Semite” – or possibly land in jail in Europe.

Each time Euro-American Gentiles write critically about the prominent Jewish role in Western society, they are likely to find marginal readership and will hardly garner credibility in the mainstream media environment. But when a Jewish author talks critically about the same issue, notably the phenomenal Jewish role in social and political affairs in the postmodern West, then his prose will elicit awe and respect. He may be sometimes met with apprehension and irritation by his fellow Jews, such as was the case with Norman Finkelstein, or to some extent Noam Chomsky, but his words will nevertheless find their place in the ears and eyes of a larger audience.

It remains an open secret that Jews played a disproportionate role in the Bolshevik revolution, and more precisely in the early Soviet secret police. It is also a fact that although being a tiny minority in America, Jews play an influential role in the opinion making industry, i.e. the film industry, the media, and higher education. “Jews are simply indispensable for other nations.” 4 There were literally tons of books published in the early and late thirties of the preceding century in America, Germany and France that provide detailed accounts of the role of the Jews in different important professions in America and Europe, and that specifically discussed Jewish numerical overrepresentation in the early Soviet Union and America respectively. The government in National Socialist Germany harnessed the most erudite anti-Semitic heavy weights in order to document every nook and cranny of Judaism in the Soviet Union and America.5 But at the beginning of the 21st century, these books are either banned or derided as unscientific, or simply shrugged off as an anti-Semitic prose. In mainstream political discussions their authors are ignored. Their prose seems to be only savored by individuals who are a priori hostile to Jews, and who usually explain away the entire human drama by reducing it to the alleged Jewish conspiracy.

Therefore, a comment or a book by a Jewish author, who preferably sports a politically correct liberal pedigree, and who tackles this greatest taboo topic of our times, must be accepted with welcome. Such is the book of a liberal Jewish-Russian-American scholar, Yuri Slezkine, whose research does not reveal to someone already knowledgeable about the Jewish question any new insights regarding the Jewish role in America and the ex-Soviet Union. Slezkine notes how Jews played a prominent role in the early Soviet terror machine and in the Soviet secret police, the NKVD, but they did it “because they fought for the state in order to become free of Jewishness.”6 In other words, they happened to be Jews against their own will. They apparently wanted to leave the image of being first and foremost cosmopolitan citizens who wished to improve by means of Bolshevisms the whole humanity. Slezkine also confirms that America was a promised land for the Jews in view of the fact that it “has no state bearing natives.”7 It was to be expected that with the collapse of communism and the decay of the Marxist mystique, the American dream, at the turn of the 21st century, became the best ersatz for disenchanted Jewish Marxists.

Slezkine notes that America became a Jewish substitute utopia because, unlike Europe and Germany, with their strong tribal adherences, “America knew only “vestigial establishment tribalism.”8 . From its inception, America was therefore an ideal country for Jews; it was designed to be a prime laboratory for diverse multicultural and academic experiments — be they of intra-European or extra-European nature. However, this multiracial social engineering was facilitated by the earlier ecumenical and globalistic framework of the early European Christians, notably American Puritans, who had always considered themselves “spiritual Jews.” What Jewish intellectuals could not attain in Europe, or later in the Soviet Union, was at hand in America where “Jewish power, economic status and cultural influence have increased dramatically since 1960.”9

On a different level of analysis, one can notice the absence in America of what the Germans call Kulturvolk, i.e. a rooted cultural and national community (and not just the adherence to the white race), which is the main prerequisite for a sound state-anchored nationalism. The absence of a common cultural identity among white Americans seems to be the fundamental weakness of either real or would-be American nationalists, racialists and conservatives who, while not hiding their hostility to Jews, are unable to muster up common cultural and national energy and shed the Biblical heritage. Harping only on genetic determinism, as many American eugenicists and racialists do, in order to promote some abstract white man American identity is often self-defeating.

One can naturally concur that Euro-Americans are influenced by Jews, but then the question arises as to how did it happen? After all, was not Christianity the offspring of Jewish monotheism? Was Jesus himself not a Jew? The influence of Jews in powerful media positions and the political apparatus, which many Europeans and Americans in private complain about, did not drop from the moon. Jewish social prominence has been the direct result of the white Gentile’s acceptance of Christianity and its early Jewish promoters - an event which was brought to its perfection in America by early Pilgrim Founding Fathers. Be it in Europe or in the USA, Christian religious denominations are just differentiated versions of Jewish monotheism. Therefore, the whole history of faked philo-Semitism, or anti-Semitism in America and in Europe, must be described as a kind of social neurosis.

European and American pro-Jewish or “Jewified” intellectuals often show signs of being more Jewish than Jews themselves. Their excessive love for Jews stems from their subconscious hatred of Jews, a fact that most Jews are perfectly aware of, and which only gives further legitimacy to Jewish social prominence. Indeed, at the beginning of the 21st century there can be no worse insult than qualifying some white politician or an academic as an “anti-Semite.” And often this derogatory noun or adjective does not originate with persons labeled as anti-Semites, but are hurled by Jews or Gentile intellectuals sympathetic to the Jewish cause. Both white Europeans and white Americans, who are resentful of Jews, often forget that the hypothetical disappearance of Jews or their lesser role in public life would not open up a golden era for the while people. Has not the entire history of all European peoples, be it before Christ or after Christ abundantly proven that when Gentiles run out of Jews, then they start hacking each other to pieces - often for trivial reasons.

As the latest version of Christianized and secularized monotheism, Judeo-Americanism represents the most radical departure from the ancient European pre-Christian genius loci, which Europeans have managed to preserve better than Americans. How then to counter strong Jewish influence without lapsing into anti-Semitism?

It is the ontological proximity of Christianity with Judaism, which explains their mutual resentment. Christian anti-Semites in Europe and America often forget, in their endless lamentation about the changing racial structure of America, that Christianity is by definition a universal religion aiming to achieve a pan-racial system of governance. Therefore, American Christians, regardless whether they are hypermoralistic sons and daughters of early Puritans, or more authority prone Catholics, are in no position to found an ethnically and racially all white Gentile society while adhering at the same time to a Christian-inspired dogma of pan-racial universalism. “Anti-Semitism was born from the Christian desire to fulfill Judaism, to “finish it up,” to attribute to it its “real” meaning.”10 The Pilgrim Fathers had exactly this globalistic and ecumenical approach in mind when they arrived in New England. Their liberal secular successors in Europe and America are obligated to resort to the same gospel. i.e., a democratic and human rights credo, as well as ecumenical democracy designed for different peoples world-wide. In the eyes of Christians “just as the Law, with Christ, had come to its end (in both senses of the word) and has become useless, in the same vein each distinction between Israel and other nations has become redundant: there are no more Jews or Greeks (Gal. 3, 28). It is universal Christianity which is verus Israel.”.11

“This process, which emerged with the Pauline reforms had a double consequence. On the one hand it ended up with the persecution of the Jews, who were depicted as the worst enemies of Christianity, on the ground of their genealogical proximity and their refusal to convert, that is, to recognize Christianity as “true Israel.” On the other hand, as Shmuel Trigano noted, while setting itself up as “new Israel,” the West recognized to Jewishness a factual, if not a juridical jurisdiction over itself. And this boils down to saying that the West has become “Israelite” to the extent that it forbade to Jews to remain Israelites. It follows from this that the name “Judeo- Christianity” is a double incarceration; it imprisons the Christian West, which by its own act subordinates itself to a jurisdiction which is not its own, and in order to regain it, puts it in a position to deny this jurisdiction to its legitimate keepers.”12

One could argue that the Christian West and its zenith America, is subconsciously anti-Semitic to the extent that it has always yearned to become Jewish. Therefore, the Christian West, and particularly America, will cease to be obsessed with Jews and anti-Semitism once it leaves this neurosis, once it returns to its own local European beliefs, and “by stopping to be what it is not and by allowing the “Other” to continue what it is.”13 The Judeo-Christian embrace, resulting in a mutual love-hate relationship, has been going on for centuries, and at the beginning of the 21th century it attained its final schizoid peak. This corroborates our thesis that Christianity is a self-defeating “proposition myth” ready to embrace all races and peoples world-wide.

Many Jewish scholars rightly acknowledge deep theological links between the Western civilization and Judaism.14 By contrast, European and especially American traditionalists, however much they may be correct in denouncing Jewish-inspired modern dogmas, such as Freudism, Marxism, and neo-conservatism, fail to go a step further and examine the Judaic origins of Christianity and mutual proximity of these two monotheist religions that make up the foundations of the modern West. When, for instance, a number of historical revisionists critically examine the historical narrative of World War II, they seem to forget the religious Judeo-Christian bonds which have shaped the historical memory of all European peoples. The words by historical revisionists will have, therefore, little echo. No wonder that the level of Jewish outcry against their critical writings will be strong. How can one, as a good Christian, dismiss the self-evidence of Holocaust yet at the same time embrace a self-evident story of a Jew named Jesus Christ, or the immaculate conception of a Jewish Virgin Mary? “Instead of submitting anti-Semitism to the free play of ideas, instead of making it a topic for debate in which all can join, Jews and their liberal supporters have managed to organize an inquisition in which all acts, writings and even thoughts critical of Jewry are treated as a threat to the moral order of mankind.”15 The highly neurotic subject regarding the Jewish question will sooner or later result in an ugly conflict between Gentiles and Jews.

The frightened attitude of American and European intellectuals, who often extol the concept of “intellectual freedom,” is best seen in their servile attitude toward Jews, to the extent that “(T)he pro-Semite has consequently made himself a mirror image of the anti-Semite.”16 The danger of this fatal embrace lies not with Jews, but with white Christians. After all, an American Christian-inspired anti-Semite must appear in the eyes of Jews as a very bizarre species. On the one hand he hates this alien Jew; yet on the other, he lugs behind himself this Levantine deity that is not of European cultural origin. Many American conservatives, and particularly American Christian Zionists, believe in the future conversion of Jews to Christianity. This monotheistic linage, however contradictory it may look, makes sense. After all, just like Mary immaculately conceived her Jewish son Jesus, she remained an immaculate Jewess by birth.

The feigned fraternity between the postmodern Euro- American “shabbath” goyim and American Jews is veiled in mendacity and mutual make-belief mimicry which can be spotted in the Western political establishment and the media all the time. At the beginning of the third millennium, feigned love for the Jews is mimicked tirelessly by European and American politicians and academics. Admittedly, this will only give rise to a proverbial Jewish hubris which will continue to grow as long as it receives the appropriate Biblical fodder from Christians and self-censored European academics.

In order to get rid of this millenarian anti-Semitic neurosis it may be advisable for all white Europeans and Americans to revive their primordial pre-Christian beliefs and critically reexamine stories of Bedouin saviors and a host of other Levantine rag-tag preachers. How about starting reading Homer again?

Dr Tomislav Sunic

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Notes:
1 Hervé Ryssen, Les espérances planétaires (Paris: éd. Baskerville, 2005), p. 333.
2 Ibid., p.274.
3 Jacques Attali, Les Juifs, le monde et l’argent (Paris: Fayard; 2002), p.19 and passim.
4 Hervé Ryssen, Les espérances planétaires, p. 415.
5 For the Jewish role in the Soviet Union and America respectively, see detailed accounts published in the series “Judaica,” in National Socialist Germany. Rudolf Kommos, Juden Hinter Stalin (first published by Niebelung Verlag in 1944, reprinted by Buchkreis Faksimile Verlag: Bremen, 1989). On page 70 Kommos writes: “The name of the Cheka, the GPU, and the NKVD is linked to Jewishness for all times.” Regarding the role of Jews in America, see in the same series, Walter Freund, B’nai B’rith- Judentum und Weltpolitik (first published by Essener Verlag 1942, reprinted by Buchkreis Faksimile Verlag: Bremen, 1990). Freund writes on page 226, “Regarding the Jewish influence in the history of the USA, Margulis names in the first place the Bible which set up the temple of democracy.”
6 Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), p.152.
7 Ibid., p.369.
8 Ibid., p.209.
9 Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Bloomington: Autorhouse, 2002), Originally published by Praeger Publications, Westport CT, 1998), p.304.
10 Alain de Benoist, Comment peut-on être païen? (Paris: Albin Michel, 1981), p.168.
11 Ibid., p.169.
12 Ibid., p.170.
13 Ibid., p.171.
14 Milton Konvitz, Judaism and the American Idea (Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1978), p. 71. Also, Jerol S. Auerbach, “Liberalism and the Hebrew Prophets,” in Commentary 84:2 (1987): 58. Compare this with Ben Zion Bokser in “Democratic Aspirations in Talmudic Judaism,” in Judaism and Human Rights, ed. Milton Konvitz (New York: Norton, 1972): “The Talmud ordained with great emphasis that every person charged with the violation of some law be given a fair trial and before the law all were to be scrupulously equal, whether a king or a pauper” (146). Ernst Troeltsch, Die Soziallehren der christlichen Kirchen and Gruppen (1922; Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1965), 768; also the passage “Naturrechtlicher and liberaler Character des freikirchlichen Neucalvinismus,” pp.762-72. Compare this with Georg Jellinek, Die Erklärung der Menschen-und Bürgerrechte (Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot, 1904).
15 Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority (Cape Canaveral, FL: Howard Allen, 1972), p.180.
16 Ibid., p.180.

Tags:



Comments:


1

Posted by Oliver Cromwell on Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:22 | #

“Therefore, American Christians… are in no position to found an ethnically and racially all white Gentile society while adhering at the same time to a Christian-inspired dogma of pan-racial universalism.”

No such orthodox Christian doctrine of “pan-racial universalism” exists.


2

Posted by Rusty on Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:29 | #

Dr. Tom advises,

“In order to get rid of this millenarian anti-Semitic neurosis it may be advisable for all white Europeans and Americans to revive their primordial pre-Christian beliefs and critically reexamine stories of Bedouin saviors and a host of other Levantine rag-tag preachers. How about starting reading Homer again?”

I’ll second that and add the Eddas and Northen sagas.  Read and discuss Plato and Cicero, Snorri and Njal. 

C.S. Lewis’ book, The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance, is a decent guide for modern Christians who already have a healthy basic understanding of Western Civ.  These rare Christian specimens would, I believe, also profit from a careful reading of the Eddas, the Sagas, and the Havamal. 

The Asatru Folk Assembly has assembled an excellent reading list for Euros interested in discovering their real native history, myths, laws, moral codes, etc.  Leider, I don’t have a link you can get to and it’s too long to post here.  Their site is http://www.runestone.org  Emai.l Steve McNallen for the Clergy Program Reading List.

St. John’s College has an excellent reading list here:
http://www.stjohnscollege.edu/academic/readlist.shtml

Valete et Heilsa,
Rusticus


3

Posted by Stan Womack on Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:33 | #

Anti-Semite differs qualitatively from anti-Semitic, one is a noun and the other an adjective. The noun is a name, label, slur, and hate caricature. The noun gives us a platform to interrogate & insult the pathology of the person claiming the supremacy required to claim the right to name the other along with a host of other pathological mental & emotional distortions.

And when we say interrogate, we really mean it. We never say “that’s a slur” or “that’s offensive.” We snidely & snarkily explore & list the pathologies of the speaker and expose his mind & heart to onlookers.

When you get right down to it, anti-Semite differs not at all from shiksa, shabbos goy, goyim, or gentile all of which nouns & names are based on a claim to supremacy by the speaker, a sense of disgust & contempt by the speaker, an interest in smothering the diversity of those so named, and a violation of our right to name ourselves. We concentrate on the noun…the use of the adjective is disregarded or made fun of unless it appears to be a predicate adjective. This is not silly…addressing the mind & heart of the speaker well & loudly is a new thing and changes the discourse.

Our definition is:

“anti-Semite (a hate caricature; a claim to supremacy over European Americans; a showing of contempt akin to shiksa, shabbas goy, goyim, and gentile)”

For more, see: http://www.resistingdefamation.org/sub/slurs9.htm

We don’t have a lot of hope that this on-the-ground, face-to-face approach will be adopted even though it is wonderfully successful because almost 100% of our readers read into our comments that we oppose “anti-Semite” as an offensive label, but you will never find that kind of cry-baby whine in our on-line syllabus or in our disputatious natures in the community, in our mail & email, and in every other way.

Another thing standing in the way of using this technique is that it requires going out into the community and talking back. It’s so much easier not to do that work.


4

Posted by Matra on Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:42 | #

While it is a common place for the vast number of white Euro- Americans to crack jokes in private about Arabs, Mexicans, Africans, or for that matter deride their fellow Gentile citizens, without looking over their shoulder, a critical comment about the strong influence of Jews in America, even when that comment is founded on empirical facts, is viewed as a grave insult to Jews.

Indeed, at the beginning of the 21st century there can be no worse insult than qualifying some white politician or an academic as an “anti-Semite.”

When I read the book these two statements stood out as obviously untrue. Blacks are granted far more protection from criticism and jokes in the US than are Jews. Celebrities (Halle Berry) and politicians (Hillary Clinton) can survive anti-Jewish remarks far more easily than if they make comments deemed offensive by blacks. (Jewish cultural and intellectual influence being perhaps the main reason for blacks’ privileged status.)

As for the second statement anti-Zionist professors (deemed anti-Semitic by Jews) are often the stars of their campus and they certainly aren’t afraid of the consequences of being labelled anti-semitic. I cannot for a minute imagine a professor who is considered racist against blacks enjoying high status at an American university. Just last night CNN gave John Mearsheimer the chance to present his views then put an AIPAC rep on the defensive over the power of the lobby. There’s no way a James Watson or Philippe Rushton’s theories on blacks would be so respectfully treated. As long as the critics don’t become “anti-Semitic” for non-Zionist reasons they should be OK.

Jews are seen by Arabs, blacks, and other minorities as just another privileged white ethnic group. According to some WNists on these boards (but not me) that fact alone would mean accepting Jews as fellow whites.


5

Posted by Matra on Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:46 | #

Halle Berry is a bad example as she’s obviously not a white Euro-American.


6

Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:03 | #

Therefore, American Christians, regardless whether they are hypermoralistic sons and daughters of early Puritans, or more authority prone Catholics, are in no position to found an ethnically and racially all white Gentile society while adhering at the same time to a Christian-inspired dogma of pan-racial universalism.

The historical record, at least in Canada, Quebec and the US shows it was never their intent to establish a racially all white Gentile society. The KKK fundamentalist Protestantism of William Joseph Simmons was not racially based. The KKK/Orange Lodge Protestantism of English Canada was not racially based. The Ultramontane Catholicism of Jesuit schooled Quebecois was not racially based. It was ethnically based.

The GWB school of Christian universalism, “we all believe in the same God but take different roads to get there”, is not an extension of Christianity. It’s a denial of Christianity. It’s the doctrine of a pagan anti-Christ. Christianity did not embrace Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Shintoists or Animists. The shift is a fundamental outgrowth of Vatican II and an attempt by the Papacy to distance itself from Pius XII.

The connection between Jews and old stock WASP Americans or WASP and Catholic French Canadians was the shift to mass immigration from Eastern European countries post 1880. Especially in the US, that policy alone increased the Jewish population at least tenfold. 

The shift is not religious in nature, as Matra points out, but a shift in in group / out group sympathies. It’s a shift in the definition of “whiteness” if you will, a shift to a white multiculturalism (the melting pot philosophy) in order to accommodate the cheap labour emanating from non-traditional origins in Europe.


7

Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:30 | #

Old Yahweh might find a paradox in anti-Semitism , having made Jews the Chosen People then watching them arrange the untimely death his alter-ego/offspring.

For those like myself who are intuitive rather than intellectual,the root cause of anti-Semitism is the fact of Jews just being Jews.


8

Posted by Tim P. on Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:54 | #

If Sunic’s solution to the white dilemma is an impassioned plea for the christian west to convert to paganism, then he has already fallen flat on his face.


9

Posted by dlfgnkdgn on Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:32 | #

Typical euro-condescension. Someone should inform Mr. Sunic that the Germans, prior to their nationalist awakening, firmly believed that “assimilation” would make the Jews disappear—as did many German Jews; the most passionate proponents of this idea, not surprisingly, were Christians, who couldn’t at the time get their heads around the idea of race. Sunic is repeating this old Christian optimism to no effect, for the purpose of lambasting American anti-Semitism, in which he is an all-too-typical european. The only neurosis here is european arrogance, this need they have of proving we are wrongheaded and should grovel at the feet of Benoist.


10

Posted by A.C. on Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:46 | #

Halle Berry is 3/4 Jewish 1/4 African American. Or whatever the nomenclature would be in such a circumstance.

I understand that Chertoff targeted David Duke some years before, back when MC was not yet head of DHS.

I have read Duke’s upon occasion and find his writings to be truthful and not at all hateful. Yet he is described in mainstream media as a hatemonger.

I sometimes wonder if telling the truth isn’t by itself anti-semitic.


11

Posted by D.E. Johnson on Fri, 09 Nov 2007 04:27 | #

Sunic (bless his heart) has fallen victim to the fabrication that anti-semitism is a sort of pathology, and that we need to be cured of it.  He suggests a return to some form of paganism, which itself was undermined or defeated by….what?  Pro-semitism?

So what we have now, effectively, is an alliance of pro-semites and anti-Christians—which ought to tell the story in itself, to anyone really paying attention.  Any way you cut the cards in this sort of deal, Western Civ and its future get the short end of the stick.


12

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:03 | #

A.C., the way the game is played, everything is anti-Semitic:  that way the Jews have everything covered; are leaving nothing to chance.  Telling the truth is anti-Semitic, lying is anti-Semitic, eating, drinking, breathing, walking, talking, are anti-Semitc, living, dying, are all anti-Semitic.  You can’t do anything without being anti-Semitic because everything a person might do is anti-Semitic on its face, everything, so whatever you do or omit to do is anti-Semitic and you’re an anti-Semite for doing or omitting to do it, as the case maybe be.  It’s impossible for someone not to be anti-Semitic:  it’s part of the definition of existence:  What exists is anti-Semitic, so if you exist you’re an anti-Semite.  Your dog is anti-Semitic, your cat is, so’s your pet goldfish.  Everything you ever did in your life was anti-Semitic and so is everything you ever will do.  Every person on the globe is anti-Semitic.  Every animate and inanimate object is.  Your car is, your computer is, the tree growing on your lawn is:  anti-Semitic.  Everything in the universe is anti-Semitic, every last thing. Suns, planets, stars, meteors, comets, galaxies, all are anti-Semitic.  Atoms are, molecules are, so’s the vacuum of interstellar space: the whole kit and caboodle is anti-Semitic.

“I am anti-Semitic because I am a part of mankind.  Therefore never send to know for whom the anti-Semitism bell tolls:  it tolls for thee.”


13

Posted by A.Noaman on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:46 | #

Anti-Semitism as a Western concept relates to biblical teachings defining Jews as an out-cast cult that should be dealt with differently. This of course was due to Jewish conspiracy against Jessis Christ leading to his crosification .Notwithstanding the French revolution’s decree of Jewish emancipation,majority of Jews continue to practice their teachings under the Hascala Law of M.Mandelsohen.The Jewish Paranoic behaviour, although unnecessary since Jews were allowed to share the same equel Socio-Political rights,had precipitated resentments among those who never thought of Jews as being able to be normalized and thus accepting Western cultures.Robinic theology had played an important role in maintaining this divide, the price of which as history cronicles was those unfortunate Bogroms.Its Jewish deeds and behaviours that define Jewish social position. Anti-Semitism was a privilege allowing Westerners to exercise their own view against the others who refuse to integrate.Now considering the on-going Israeli occupation of Palestine and the Apartheid policy fostered by Zionism, Liberal Westeners may tend to criticize such behaviour and would conseqently be labled as Anti-Semitism.  In the past Anti-Semitism used to define feelings of others towards Jews, to-day it refers to those Jews don’t want them to criticize Israel. In order for Anti-Semitism to be clearly understood, it must be assessed within the context of Israeli behaviour toward the Palestinians.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Beyond political correctness.  Beyond even whiteness studies.  UPDATED 02.10.07
Previous entry: Ziopedia Disinformation?

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Wed, 25 Dec 2024 13:55. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sun, 22 Dec 2024 01:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle continued for comments after 1000' on Sat, 21 Dec 2024 16:14. (View)

anonymous commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle continued for comments after 1000' on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:11. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 21:35. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 20:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:49. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 18:47. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:01. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:52. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:17. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:23. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 08 Dec 2024 14:19. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 06 Dec 2024 20:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 06 Dec 2024 01:08. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 04 Dec 2024 19:00. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Mon, 02 Dec 2024 23:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'The journey to The Hague revisited, part 1' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:20. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'The journey to The Hague revisited, part 1' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 13:34. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 04:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 29 Nov 2024 01:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 23:49. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 01:33. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:02. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:53. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 04:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:10. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:05. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:32. (View)

affection-tone