A little Christmas cheer From the BBC:-
I rather doubt that “all parties” claim. “All parties” can only be treated equally if the decisions in specific cases are free of minority nepotism. I just don’t believe that minorities who retain their ethnocentic (or faith-centric) worldviews can be as fair and self-abnegating as, regrettably, we are. Like all councils Wyre (PDF) has its Equality Action Plan. But how, exactly, could it implement a race-blind policy of council employment? Does not equality imply merit under Britain’s current laws? How is that possible if a nepotistic Pakistani happens to be taking the hiring decisions? Genuine equality would require a certain standard in how races view themselves and eachother, and of course it does not exist. Nor can it. The same is true of any Marxistically-embattled minority viz-a-vis the majority. Still, it’s good to see the Council and Lancashire Police forced into humility this time. One must hope that a few egalitarian wings have been clipped. The other cause for some Christmas cheer is this story from The Times:-
So how do we turn this into chain emigration? Comments:2
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 24 Dec 2006 22:23 | # SoSueM, Wikipedia reflects much of the leftism endemic in our universities, sadly. There are plenty of similar examples of Marxist or Marxised political extremists visiting their sickness upon Wiki. I’m working on a post at present about late romantic music and found this page, with a list of composers. Count the women who you’ve never heard of:- 3
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 24 Dec 2006 22:29 | # Meanwhile, I wonder how the Wiki leftists originally reacted to the recent story of a racist attack by four white youths in Edinburgh upon a poor, defenceless Sikh boy. You remember the case? They cut off his hair - a particularly personal humiliation for a Sikh. Alas for the anti-racist self-haters there will be NO prosecutions:-
The rest of the story is here:- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/6207509.stm 4
Posted by SoSueMe on Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:57 | # Wikipedia reflects much of the leftism endemic in our universities… Wikipedia is controlled by special people—or rather, by a special People. This is a parody of it: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/N*gg*r_manual Remove asterisks to enjoy net FOS while you can. Post a comment:
Next entry: Not a gift, exactly.
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by SoSueMe on Sun, 24 Dec 2006 21:07 | #
And a little Xmas laughter—Jim Bowery in particular may be interested in these claims from discussion of the Kriss Donald article on Wikipedia:
Post-colonial studies and sociology of race have the same status with regard to “racially-motivated” killings that physics has with regard to gravity or astronomy with regard to planets. The “facts of the case” are those revealed by serious scientific investigation. Anti-racist and postcolonial theories make up a significant portion of serious academic inquiry into racism. ... The situation here is thus NOT analogous to that of, say, BNP views on Anthony Walker, or Kilroy-Silk’s views on Islam; it is more akin to the situation which would arise regarding evolution and Creationism if a majority of the population, politicians, courts and media happened to support Creationism. The critics of my edits would logically have to maintain in this case that the majority opinion among scientists researching the area would have to be treated as a “tiny minority opinion” and effectively excluded.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kriss_Donald