Austin Chronicle: The US Heartland’s Fury Seethes

Posted by James Bowery on Sunday, 01 April 2007 14:48.

Michael Ventura of the Austin Chronicle writes:

These people are watching their towns die. Watching their way of life die. They are living the end of their dream, and they didn’t believe that could happen. Like their ancestors, they’ve worked hard and hard and hard. They’ve played by the rules, believed the right things, worshipped the proper God, lived as they deeply felt life should be lived, and they’re losing everything that matters to them. And there’s nothing they can do about it except to keep working hard, because that’s all they know. They’re losing a way of life because of forces beyond their ken. Giant agribusiness, globalization, politicians selling them out, a tidal wave of history sweeping them away. Republicans and right-wing demagogues play to them, so they vote for Republicans. But it doesn’t help. Liberals and Democrats rarely come to talk to them, and still more rarely talk with them – why, then, would they vote for liberals and Democrats? “Blue state” snobs make jokes about the stupid “red states.” These rural people are not stupid. They’re furious. Time has passed them by, and they don’t know why. They’ve done and been everything that they were taught to do and be, and it’s come to nothing. That’s what liberals don’t get. These people are furious, and they’ve got something to be furious about, however much their fury may be misdirected. They want somebody to blame – a useless but human need.

So I walk into their Kansas diner, and in my differentness I become an instant symbol of what’s pulling them down. Their kids are leaving town, their towns are dying, their leaders are failing them, they’re helpless to stop it. They expected to live prosperously in these places for centuries – their courthouses were built to last centuries. They’re losing it all, and there’s no one to give a damn. They didn’t believe this could happen – could not conceive that their time would be so short and that their toil would be futile and that their dreams would die so hard.

What Mr. Ventura didn’t say is that the kids didn’t just leave town… they moved to the cities trying to find another way of life and failed to form families that could support children as “blue state” real estate prices soared. Demographic collapse is more than just the loss of a way of life. When it is accompanied by deliberate policies of race replacement, it is genocide far more effective than anything Jews claim Germans did to them.

And by the way, regarding those kids moving to the cities to expend the last of their people’s vital force:

Cui bono?

Tags:

Comments:

Posted by Pax Judaica on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 17:19 | #

Locke describes America exactly… what could the following be but an outward manifestation of that?

“libertarian/CATO-Institute/neocon/Heritage-Foundation/WASP-blueblood-Bush-Rockefeller-Country-Club-Skull&Bones;-Conservative set-up”

It’s right before your functioning-eyes-connected-to-a-non-functioning brain.

You see, we don’t need semi-bright aryan savages except as front-men, minimum-wage Army Rangers, and blacksonblondes.com models. Tradeable labor goes to Southeast Asia, non-tradeable to Mexican illegals, technologist labor to Bangalore or imported Asian indentured servants, and none for the bowerys of the world (and for the better). As for the higher positions, let’s just say your piddling minds aren’t worth one-fiftyth of ours and leave it at that.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 17:35 | #

PJ,

If you are a particularly determined and manipulative European-American, thanks for the motivational talk.

If you are Jew, thanks for the motivational-talk.

Posted by Englander on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:54 | #

He has troll written all over him. His posts are carefully crafted to try and strike at every sensitive spot. I recommend starving him.

Posted by Matra on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 19:11 | #

The linked article below from the Jewish Week provides a look at one of the forces working hard to destroy more Middle American lives.

A Jewish community divided on a range of other issues is mostly united behind the need for comprehensive immigration reform and regards the House bill as a good first step.

“Once you get past the Israel issue, it’s near the top of the list of priorities for a lot of groups,” said Haddar Susskind, Washington representative for the Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA).

“It’s one issue where there’s mostly agreement between progressive grass-roots groups and the big national organizations,” said Mik Moore, director of policy for the Jewish Funds for Justice. “There is a real sense of common cause.”

Recently the JFJ sponsored a trip to the Arizona-Mexico border for ten rabbis as a way of putting a human face on the immigration issue.Participants came away “with more of a sense that this is a fundamental, core issue that they needed to bring back to their congregations and share with them,” Moore said.

http://tinyurl.com/2nmqxr

I doubt those congregations will hear much about the plight of the people mentioned in the Austin Chronicle article.

I find it interesting that Jewish groups are so upfront about their intentions and efforts to flood the US with immigrants. Yet just the other day Ehud Olmert said that not a single Palestinian refugee would be given the right of return to what is now Israel as that would undermine the Jewish state. Chutzpah is the perfect Jewish word.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 19:26 | #

Returning to Michael Ventura’s article, it is an immensely sad and, as things stand, surely hopeless situation that he describes. Do these people on their farms and in their diners realise that they are in a demographic war, in a war on material self-sufficiency, and in a political war? Do they understand that, as parties to these wars, they have to fight or die - and they are not fighting. There is no future in remaining atomised and betrayed.

My experience of telling white Americans they have to migrate internally is none too successful. But they are spread thin across the south-west now, and there will come a point when they are just not economically viable anywhere very much.

They have two choices:-

1. They organise to reconcentrate in another place - meaning they give up their personal histories and attachments, just as they forefathers did so long ago, and bitter for them though it would be - and they migrate, probably, to the North-West.

2. They stay put but do all they can to remove themselves from the economic and governmental forces that are driving their dissolution. That means, for example, they control their appetites for non-local branded goods and look, to the fullest extent, to retain their profits and resources within the community. They create micro-economies based as much as possible on a cooperative model, on contra-trading and other forms of barter. They home-school. They turn their anger into pride.

In either case - a New America or an old economics - what they need, and most lack, are visionary leaders who can express their dreams and motivate their desires. Ultimately, if their communities fail, and they fail as a people in consequence, it is because those who would lead them have proved inadequate to the mammoth demands of the times. Cometh the hour, cometh a nobody.

Posted by Billy Joe Daniels on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:04 | #

“Do these people on their farms and in their diners realise that they are in a demographic war, in a war on material self-sufficiency, and in a political war? Do they understand that, as parties to these wars, they have to fight or die - and they are not fighting.” [Guessedworker]

Right on, Guessedworker. You’ve outlined the Algeria Solution for white liberation.

Posted by law abiding asian cognitive elitist on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:34 | #

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/29/wjapmurder229.xml

Another victory for the superior Asian!

Go GNXP!

Posted by Pax Judaica on Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:15 | #

Beasts-of-burden attempting to do what Creation precluded makes the best humor: think.

“Matra’s comment is an extremely important one which both Euros and Jews should read and think about very carefully. It’s a post about one of the most fundamental and intractable problems of our day. A solution to this problem badly needs to be found.”

Observe your mall’s food court and see the solution, you mental dingbat. We won. Done and over with and securely and irreversibly. And not today or yesterday, but a generation ago. It’s now our way or the highway. Go find another planet to build your Fourth Reich on.

Do as we command faithfully and we might even reserve Madagscar as a wildlife refuge for a few ten thousand “pure” Europeans… preserving diversity is a mighty good business decision for tourist firms availing to wealthy negro businessmen and fellow Jews simple-minded, fully-breasted-and-buttocked Aryanesses in fun-houses. (Don’t worry about genetic introgression, we’ll require prophylatics to protect our investment.)

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:48 | #

Shalom.

Posted by Lurker (Mk II) on Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:59 | #

Hey fellows, read this thread on The Guardian’s blog, and especially comments by “LaMer” and “CoeurdeLion” (no, they’re not me) and the panic-stricken reactions of the PC fraternity—“Stop this horrible stuff at once, Mummy”:

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/dave_hill/2007/03/i_was_walking_home_the.html

Race realism is starting to creep into the most surprising places!

Posted by Frank Mcguckin on Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:59 | #

Running away to the the NW is not the solution.

There is only one solution:throw the invaders out by any means.

Posted by Frank Mguckin on Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:08 | #

PAX Judaica

If your view is widely held by most American Jews, Euro-Christian Americans have just cause for exterminating “Amerian” Jewry.

Maybe you should rethink your position.

Posted by dchamil on Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:07 | #

The phrase cited is “Cui bono?”, “Whose benefit?”

Posted by James Bowery on Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:10 | #

The phrase cited is “Cui bono?”, “Whose benefit?”

Thanks. Corrected.

Posted by Top on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:45 | #

I read the Guardian blog comments and was impressed that there were postings which weren’t 100% PC and/or delusional concering race.

But the PC police did come out. Have you ever noticed that there are two type of career PCers?

(1) The superior moralist. Ex. in the comments:
“Shame on those of you who are using this thread to propound irrelevant and ill-considered theories about genetic difference. It’s quite appalling.”

These people use race discussion to show off their holier than thou attitude. They have nothing to say about race or human relations or anything else for that matter. But they are quick to tell you how much more superior they are than you. They are the egalitarians who believe that they are superior. Of course they miss the contradiction of that position. They are not very bright.

(2) The crazy Revolutionary ex. from the thread:
“The concepts of “British society” and “British Identity”, as far as I’m concerned are well passed their sell-by date. It is time to move beyond the nation state (and its power structures which would hold us in their grip, telling us who we are, where our loyalties lies, our taxes belong, and how we should and shouldn’t behave) and to create societies of our own choosing. We have the freedom and now, with the Internet and biometrics, also the means, to do so. Roll on the Revolution . . . .”

The whole argument is bogus of course. It’s empty, devoid of anything real, historically laughable - to call it over-optimistic is to miss the deception in it. It’s not meant to be real anyway. It’s meant to seduce young college kids and Oprah fans - it sounds pretty but it’s stated goals cut to the bone. These are the new age communists - usually of non-European ethnic groups, well mostly one ethnic group. In Eastern Europe these same people also called for a type of paradise, money-free (as opposed to race-free) paradise. That it ended in gulags is not relavant. It all sounds so good. How can we possibly argue against paradise - AND against the Revolution (capital R observe)????

Posted by ben tillman on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 04:11 | #

How can we possibly argue against paradise - AND against the Revolution (capital R observe)????

“The Revolution” is a thinly disguised synonym for “the Jewish community”.

Trotsky wrote in The Moralists and Sycophants Against Marxism, “The welfare of the revolution—that is the supreme law!” It’s clear what was going on in his self-deceiving mind.

Posted by wintermute on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:47 | #

“The Revolution” is a thinly disguised synonym for “the Jewish community”.

Ben, this is brilliant and deserves to be widely disseminated.

The capital-R revolution, wherever it is found, is nothing besides a malignant euphemism for the advancement of Jewish power - political, social, and economic.

Though he was not as concise as you, Bakunin was the first to see this clearly:

Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, closely and intimately connected with another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well—this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation—which speculates upon the labor of people—will always find the means for its existence…

This was written in 1872, by the way.

In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack-regime, under which the workingmen and the workingwomen, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of the drum. The privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks…

Surprising, how easily Jewish manoevers and the results of their manoevering are anticipated, once the basic ‘trick’ is seen through.

For those here still trying to ‘crack the code’, I recommend rereading the books of Exodus, Joshua, Genesis, and Isaiah. The Jews have not deviated from their spiritual raison d’etre - hatred, destruction, and enslavement of the entire earth - in the smallest degree, not in three thousand years. I am sorry to say that it now seems probable that the majority of readers here will live to see the high noon of the Jewish power, the Messianic Age.

Christians will be disappointed to find no Second Coming and no Rapture, but they’ve been decieved on this score thousands of time in the last millenia and seem unable to internalize the fact that, finally, this time, he really isn’t coming . . . so their disappointment and concomitant suffering will be minimized.

Der Ewige Christian as Scarlett O’Hara: “Tomorrow is another day!”

Posted by those magnificent asians on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:07 | #

Rural farm loans for everyone but white males:

http://attra.ncat.org/guide/a_m/socially_disadvantaged.html

Note the inclusion of Asians in the “socially disadvantaged” category - and that’s for far more than just farm loans.

Not the sort of thing you’d read about at gnxp.

Then again, socially _advantaged_ aliens don’t want you to know all the goodies at their disposal.

That’s not “fair.”

Posted by those magnificent asians on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:55 | #

http://www.usagovernmentgrants.org/grants_for_minorities.html

http://www.scholarships-ar-us.org/grants/asians.htm

That’s the tip of the iceberg, found after only ~ 60 seconds of internet searching.

No wonder they oppose separatism - don’t want to cut down all the goodies now, do we?

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:53 | #

From the rural farm loan website:-

A socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher is one of a group whose members have been subjected to racial, ethnic, or gender prejudice because of their identity as members of the group without regard to their individual qualities. For purposes of this program, socially disadvantaged groups are women, African Americans, American Indians, Alaskan Natives, Hispanics, Asians, and Pacific Islanders.

This policy is no doubt zealously overseen by this goodlooking fellow, Mr James F. Radintz, Director of the National Program Office of the Farm Service Agency. His phone number, for any socially-disadvantaged Boers who need a little help in starting a new life farming in America, is: (202) 720-1632.

Posted by chickenhawk on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:08 | #

“is one of a group whose members have been subjected to racial, ethnic, or gender prejudice because of their identity as members of the group without regard to their individual qualities”

In other words, a farmer or rancher who has been denied participation in this program because of his identity as a “white male”, independent of his personal qualities, is therefore a “socially disadvantaged ” person and eligible for participation.

This program is not logically internally consistent.

Posted by GT on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:24 | #

Well put, GW…

“My experience of telling white Americans they have to migrate internally is none too successful. But they are spread thin across the south-west now, and there will come a point when they are just not economically viable anywhere very much.

“They have two choices:-

“1. They organise to reconcentrate in another place - meaning they give up their personal histories and attachments, just as they forefathers did so long ago, and bitter for them though it would be - and they migrate, probably, to the North-West.

“2. They stay put but do all they can to remove themselves from the economic and governmental forces that are driving their dissolution. That means, for example, they control their appetites for non-local branded goods and look, to the fullest extent, to retain their profits and resources within the community. They create micro-economies based as much as possible on a cooperative model, on contra-trading and other forms of barter. They home-school. They turn their anger into pride.

“In either case - a New America or an old economics - what they need, and most lack, are visionary leaders who can express their dreams and motivate their desires. Ultimately, if their communities fail, and they fail as a people in consequence, it is because those who would lead them have proved inadequate to the mammoth demands of the times.”

Regarding choice #1:

Might the atomized individuals and small groups choosing to stay in Aztlan have a death wish? Better that they not throw their lives away. When the time to fight arrives – that is, if ever – far better for them to be where the water is located with a community at their backs, a desert between themselves and Los Angeles, and standing ready to shut down everything supplied to the southwest.

Regarding choice #2:

More than a few of us White-thinking folks are engineers and technicians. In addition to agriculture and aquaculture, why not collect and process scrap metal? Why not repair, rebuild and clone the equipment needed to manufacture goods for barter within the micro-economy? After all, China has done this with 60 year-old American-made milling machines. And why are speculative investors needed? We have garages, colleagues and friends – sweat equity partnerships and brains – in addition to tons of salvageable machinery, circuit boards, electrical components and scrap wire lying about.