Black Athlete, Jesse Owens, Received Greatest Ovations of His Career From Nazis

Posted by James Bowery on Friday, 30 March 2007 07:07.

Several other misconceptions about the 1936 Olympics are prevalent. Not only was Owens not rebuffed by Hitler, Owens wasn’t shunned by the German audience at the Berlin stadium either. Baker reports that Owens so captured the imagination of the crowd it gave him several ear-shattering ovations. Owens had been prepared for a hostile reception; a coach had warned him in advance not to be upset by anything that might happen in the stands. “Ignore the insults,” Owens was told, “and you’ll be all right.” Later Owens recalled that he had gotten the greatest ovations of his career at Berlin.

Some “Holocaust Denial” historian?

No.  It’s from Rick Shenkman, George Mason University associate professor of history, excerpted from his “Legends, Lies and Cherished Myths of American History”.

When will we see this portrayed honestly in a movie complete with Hitler waving to a victorious Jesse Owens and Owens waving back, as attested by Owens?

And about what else are “they” lying to us?

Tags:



Comments:


1

Posted by Yawnnnnn on Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:57 | #

Ooh, you mean those nasty Jews?

http://www.forward.com/articles/jesse-owens-man-and-myth-at-the-1936-olympics/

Yes, “they” obviously aren’t saying something ....


2

Posted by Top on Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:48 | #

Can anything about WW2 be trusted?

Yawnnn:
FACT:  WW2’s story is used as the main propaganda masterpiece to justify the dispossession and demographic transformation of the West.  Jesse Owens is just one little piece in the puzzle.  It doesn’t matter what the Forward or some obsucure book say - the majority people of the in the West ‘know’ how the story happened because they were told how it happened.  And what they ‘know’ is not this version.  Same could be said about a thousand other things about WW2. 

But we are ONLY talking about the dispossession and demographic transformation of the white West!  That’s no big deal after all!!  Let’s just give that thought a collective YAWNNNN and not think about too hard what’s causing it to happen.


3

Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:04 | #

I get it—you lie to an entire civilization for a generation distorting accounts—collect the economic rent “due” you, and once you’ve destroyed your opposition, you let the truth slip in your own channels to alert the faithful they need to stop lying to themselves.


4

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:08 | #

John Toland biography of Hitler recounts that Owens was very well treated in Germany by those rAYcist Nazis. Owens is quoted as saying that Hitler smiled and waived to him. Nevertheless, one still frequently reads newspaper accounts portraying Hitler and others angry leaving the stadium because a fast-footed Negro shattered the myth of Aryan superiority.


5

Posted by ten62 on Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:39 | #

Yawnnnnn wrote:

Ooh, you mean those nasty Jews?

http://www.forward.com/articles/jesse-owens-man-and-myth-at-the-1936-olympics/

1. Unless every Jew by every thought, word and deed seeks to harm the interests of whites, no Jew by any thought, word or deed seeks to harm the interests of whites.

2. Unless every man is taller than every woman, no man is taller than any woman.

The concept of ‘average’ is tricky for some. When it suits them.


6

Posted by Pax Judaica on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 04:52 | #

Ah, I see. MR’s nazi-in-chief craves a Shitler hagiography, but his genes can’t produce. Perhaps this commonality accounts for the sympathy toward Owens?

As for the rest of this nest of dead-enders, when will you realize that your idol never had a chance? Your so-called “master race” merely poured five million european anti-Semites into a cossack meat-grinder in furtherance of our historic mission.


7

Posted by Daniel J on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 05:02 | #

Is anyone going to grace this retard with a response?

Have you even read anything on this website?

I think you would be hard pressed to find anyone here that gives a shit about Hitler.

James was pointing out how the media spins Hitler.


8

Posted by Daniel J on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 05:06 | #

and you are right that the Germans died as a result of Jewish scheming in pursuit of their Jewish mission…

but, your “mission” isn’t Historic. rather it is a megalomaniacal fantasy that is doomed to failure…


9

Posted by Pax Judaica on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 05:46 | #

We have a genuine Nazi right above in “Friedrich Braun”. Fortunately for him the material wealth is ours, for otherwise we’d pancake germany into a glistening, half-inch thick 300,000 square-mile glass plate within the half-hour, deleting this extraneous civilization. Who needs them, anyway?

To show we’re quite serious about not tolerating any anti-Semitic nations, I believe iran has volunteered to host the next light show. (All of you should join us in hoping that this ahmadinejad continues in his ways, which provides pretext for smashing his country to pieces.)


10

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:17 | #

We have a genuine Nazi right above in “Friedrich Braun”.

It’s National Socialist to you, mister!


11

Posted by Desmond Jones on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:46 | #

Moshe Dayan, on being asked about the reasons for his success: “Of course, it helps if one can arrange to fight Arabs [or Persians].”

Iran, mean IQ of 84.


12

Posted by Daniel J on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:24 | #

There was also Nazi’s among the Jews…

Judenrat

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Burros

What is your point?

Almost no one here believes the official Holocaust mythology, and we certainly don’t care if someone admires Hitler…

However, I believe you overestimate “Jews” (you fail to specify if we mean Aske-nazis, or Sephardi Jews) and their power.

You wouldn’t be anything if America withdrew its support for your policies.

I apologize to Friedrich, I don’t mind if you admire Hitler, I just think you are possibly in the minority.


13

Posted by Daniel J on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:31 | #

which provides pretext for smashing his country to pieces.

The pretext will not be provided by the politically weak President of Iran, but by the ruthless, inhuman and Germanically expedient Mossad…


14

Posted by Torgrim on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:32 | #

posted by top;

Can anything about ww2 be trusted?

My father a veteran of ww2, now 86 years old and very aware now, as ever, of good fortune and bad, warns of war.
He like “top”, never trusted reasons for ww2, but was caught up in the fury of that time. Having been in that horrible war, he trusts NOT, the powers that be! Unfortunately, my father, gets to watch the slow and painful death of the white, pioneer founders and their prodigy, of this country, after spending a six year sentence in hell, fighting for what was promised, a peaceful land, for his great, grandchildren. However, now he watches the invasion of hostile groups from the south and other hostile groups, picking this once homogeneous nation to pieces. 
He watches, a proud man, of pioneer stock, born on the Dakota Plains. A survivor. A patriot. A man that loves.

A man that mourns.


15

Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:42 | #

The figure Desmond quotes for Iranian average IQ is 11 points lower than Israel’s 95.

I dont believe Friedrich is the only commentator who espouses the Nat Soc cause.

Quite a number of Israel’s policies sit comfortably with National Socialist idealogy including racial preference for the infernal and parasitical pests who have occupied and renamed their enemy’s land and a mixed economy which has largely prevented Jews from giving the world a demonstration of vampires attempting to prey on vampires.


16

Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:46 | #

Apologies for the typo.


17

Posted by Daniel J on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:02 | #

I dont believe Friedrich is the only commentator who espouses the Nat Soc cause.

I didn’t say that… I am sure there is a few National Socialists here, I meant people who would openly express admiration for Hitler’s particular implementation of said political/economical system and the man himself.


18

Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:24 | #

The ironically-named Pax Judaica must be very proud of his begging-bowl proffering country, especially as its per capita GDP is a lowly number 27 in world rankings and thus well below many Aryan nations.

The gullible citizenry of the US are taxed punitively to provide aid to Israel, the natural enemy of the once-great eleemosynary nation of dupes.


19

Posted by James Bowery on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:26 | #

Hitler succeeded, during the 1930s, in pulling Germany out of the economic disaster that it took WW II to pull the US out of.

Having said that, it is obvious that Hitler failed to capitalize on the most important potential of his regime:

The Transfer Agreement

If he’d focused on the Transfer Agreement all the energy he put into his war machine, he would have truly accomplished everything he said he stood for.  I really don’t think he had an excuse for not following through with the full committment of not only the German people and Zionist Jews, but also of what would become known as “The Allies”.


20

Posted by PaxAryania on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 06:07 | #

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Young-Hitler-I-Knew/dp/1853676942

Israel is a pathetic waste of a country. If the entire world was Jewish without Goyim you it be covered with Glass, Porn, and counterfeit currencies. Don’t worry PoxJudicia, the 9/11 cat is out of the bag and white goyim know the Jews did it.  Your poisonous day will come.


21

Posted by JB on Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:20 | #

Yawnnnnn:

Yes, “they” obviously aren’t saying something ....

do a search on Google and you’ll find hundreds of references to the myth of Jesse Owen (especially about him “destroying Hitler’s myth of aryan supremacy”) in mainstream news websites (including ESPN if I recall) and much less references to the true story. The Forward isn’t a national newspaper and this article and Shenkman’s book will not likely change the persistence of the myth.


22

Posted by Yawnnnn on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:37 | #

JB wrote

“do a search on Google and you’ll find hundreds of references to the myth of Jesse Owen (especially about him “destroying Hitler’s myth of aryan supremacy”) in mainstream news websites (including ESPN if I recall) and much less references to the true story. The Forward isn’t a national newspaper and this article and Shenkman’s book will not likely change the persistence of the myth.”

But what does this fact you mention (and I agree) have to do with Jews?  So, illiterate and idiotic community college educated journalists are really just being “forced” to write this nonsense?  Or, could it just be a bad case of “historical incest” where every body keeps repeating the same nonsense, for multi-cultural and leftist propaganda reasons?  I mean, you CAN find it on the internet, everywhere, that the story is nonsense.  And most of the writers I see writing this stuff (yes, I googled) are NOT Jews .... and so?


23

Posted by ben tillman on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:03 | #

Or, could it just be a bad case of “historical incest” where every body keeps repeating the same nonsense….

Think before you write.  The “nonsense” has an origin, does it not?


24

Posted by Yawnnn on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:44 | #

ben tillman wrote:

“Think before you write.  The “nonsense” has an origin, does it not? “

Yes, stupidity and propaganda, this isn’t denied.  But what does this have to do with Jews I keep asking—show me the proof THEY are to blame.


25

Posted by the inverted yawn on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:07 | #

James Bowery’s original post did not mention the word “Jews” at all, and his comment about responsibility read:

“And about what else are “they” lying to us?”

Perhaps “Yawnnn” has a reason to suspect that a group with a stranglehold on the mass media, and over-represented in the professions, and with an ethnic interest in promoting the “Owens defeated Hitler, who snubbe dhim” myth, may have had something to do with it.

But Bowery did not state that as his thesis at all.  Mr. Bowery can tell us all what he meant by the word “they”, defend that usage, and we can progress from there.


26

Posted by ben tillman on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:32 | #

But what does this have to do with Jews I keep asking—show me the proof THEY are to blame.

The Jewish community is the only one with the motive and the opportunity.  It’s quite straightforward.


27

Posted by Yawnnnn on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:07 | #

ben tillman wrote:

“The Jewish community is the only one with the motive and the opportunity.  It’s quite straightforward. “

Based on what FACTS?  What is their motive?  What is their opportunity?  Apparently, it’s not straight forward.  Would your argument hold up in court?  I will accept both the modus tollens or modus pones form of argument from you ...


28

Posted by James Bowery on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:26 | #

Mr. Bowery can tell us all what he meant by the word “they”

There must be some term for the epistemological discipline of not overburdening your epistle.

Whatever that term is, invoke it.

I will however say this:

It is more reasonable to use “Jews” as “they” than that vast majority of other identities.


29

Posted by Desmond Jones on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:12 | #

Some of the facts;

“In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi Stephen Wise.”

On December 4th, 1935, Walter White, Secretary of the NAACP, composed a letter, that was never sent, urging Jesse Owens to boycott the 1936 Summer Olympics. J.E. Sprinarn is listed as President on the letterhead.

On page two White writes;

Let me make this quite concrete. Anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic and anti-Negro prejudices are growing alarmingly throughout the United States.

http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/aaohtml/exhibit/0824001.html


30

Posted by Yawnnn on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:24 | #

Hmmm, I’m not sure exactly what Desmond Jones just posted, but it had NO relevance to how “they” control the history surrounding Jesse Owens.  Everybody keeps blaming “they” (or them, properly) ... but not one iota of evidence to support their case.  How “right-wing” of you.


31

Posted by Desmond Jones on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:49 | #

“They” controlled the NAACP. They provided a substantial portion of the NAACP’s original financing and emergency funding to save the group from bankruptcy during the Depression. They constituted nearly half of the NAACP’s legal staff during the 30s. They, through Walter White, and the NAACP, attempted to pressure Jesse Owens to boycott the 1936 Olympics.

Clearly, they had “the motive and the opportunity.”


32

Posted by JB on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:44 | #

Yawn:

Based on what FACTS?  What is their motive?  What is their opportunity?

they run the media and Hollywood. I thought even our opponents knew that. They use anything they think useful to discredit or smear nazi Germany whenever they can, whether it be Jesse Owens demolishing Hitler’s racial ideas (not true Germany won more medals than all the rest of the world combined) or Elie Wiesel’s fantasies about germans throwing babies in the air and shooting them and all the rest of it. They try to do the same regularly with David Duke or the Gaede twins, with basically anyone that refuse to go along the programmed destruction of the white race by the US Government.

The owners and editors can’t do an 180 degree turn and start spreading news and editorials that contradict what they published years ago and became part of the popular culture whatever the truth is because they would lose credibility but if the public doesn’t know the truth and has little chance of learning about it and if it fits their racial agenda or simply fits their emotional leanings they simply keep it up. No major media will go against the trend anyway so there’s even less incentive to tell the truth. Hence the regular bringing up of the Jesse Owens myth, hence the toning down or cover-up of violent black on white crimes, hence the continuous anti-serb bias which really started when a PR firm used an Auschwitz-style skinny man behind a barb wired fence photo and distributed it everywhere to turn the serbs into neo-nazis, hence the cover-up of the mexican invasion, hence a lot of other anti-white messages and propaganda they regularly orchestrate.

As far as low level employees are concerned they don’t have the freedom to write things as they saw it, it has to fit the editorial line and that line doesn’t have to be clearly established with capital letters in black on white. Read what this leftist has to say about his experience as a reporter and low level editor :

http://www.swans.com/library/art8/rdeck018.html

That point was first driven forcibly home to me in the 60s when a senior editor at the Miami News said during a news meeting that he wasn’t interested in a story I was pitching about Israeli maltreatment of some Palestinians. “You’d be interested if it were the other way around,” I said dryly, and unwisely. I was severely reprimanded for my attitude that, it was hinted, smacked of ...you guessed it ... anti-Semitism.

A few years later, on Feb. 21, 1973, Israeli fighter planes shot down a civilian airliner, killing all on board. The Libyan Arab Airlines 727 had been en route to Cairo when it ran into a blinding sandstorm. Having lost his landmarks, the pilot became confused and drifted over the Sinai Peninsula which was then controlled by Israeli forces. Cairo air control was providing him with the information he needed to fly back to the airport when two Israeli Phantom jet fighters appeared and shot the airliner down. A total of 113 men, women and children died.

I was the wire editor of the Miami News at the time, the guy in charge of the news coming in from wire services such as the Associated Press. When the story broke, I passed it on to the news editor and prepared to handle the updates and the sidebars. Sidebars are the additional stories always accompanying major breaking news. In this case I was expecting details about weather conditions that contributed to the crash, profiles of some of the people who died, interviews with their families, analysis of why Israel would shoot down an airliner, comments from U.S. and Israeli authorities and public figures.

I waited in vain. Updates were sparse, sidebars nearly non-existent. I called the local AP office and asked when we could expect more stories. The low-ranking AP exec I talked to was noncommittal. Little further information became available and the story was essentially a one-edition splash and then disappeared.

It is instructive to compare what happened then to what happened in a similar incident ten years later.

When the Soviet Union shot down a Korean airliner which had strayed over Siberia in September 1983, killing 269 people, American media and politicians became hysterical. They averred that the incident was proof that the Soviet Union was the Evil Empire that President Reagan had always claimed it was. TV newscasts and newspapers were filled with stories about the depravity of the Soviets, features about the passengers lost in the shootdown, and the condemnation by politicians and pundits of all types. The story remained in the news for weeks.

(When the U.S. shot down an Iranian airliner in 1988 killing 290 innocent men, women and children, the media and the politicians dismissed it as an insignificant accident. Ho hum. These things happen.)

The refusal of the U.S. government and the U.S. media to condemn Israel for anything at all was vividly evident when Israeli fighter planes and torpedo boats attacked the U.S.S. Liberty on June 8, 1967 with rockets, napalm and machine gun fire. The U.S. and Israel proclaimed that it was all an accident, a case of mistaken identity. Israel, you see, thought the U.S. spy ship was an Egyptian ship. And the media blithely went along with the cover-up.

There are those in the Navy who are still bitter, Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, for one. Thirty years after the attack on the Liberty he wrote: ”...I believe Moshe Dayan concluded that he could prevent Washington from becoming aware of what Israel was up to (taking control of the Golan Heights) by destroying the primary source of acquiring that information, the USS Liberty. The result was a wanton sneak attack that left 34 American sailors dead and 171 seriously injured. What is so chilling and cold-blooded, of course, is that they could kill as many Americans as they did in confidence that Washington would cooperate in quelling any public outcry.”


33

Posted by JB on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:49 | #

more about the jewish role in the NAACP here :

http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/naacp.htm

For years W.E.B. DuBois was the only Black officer in the NAACP, which was largely directed, funded, and controlled in its early decades by Jews like Henry Moskowitz and Joel Spingarn. [ARSON, p. 140] (In 1913 Spingarn announced a yearly award named after himself, the “Spingarn Medal,” for the “highest and noblest achievement of an American Negro.” [DINER, p. 138] ) In a later era, and another Black organization, the Southern Leadership Christian Conference, a Jew—Stanley Levison—even wrote Martin Luther King’s speeches for him. [MARTIN, p. 132] Levison has been described as one of King’s “closest personal advisers.” [KAUFMAN, J., 1988, p. 66] This voice of “Christian Leadership,” Levison, was also discovered by the FBI to have been a former Communist party member. [KAUFMAN, J., p. 66] Another Jew, Marvin Rich, was the “chief fundraiser and key speech writer for the Congress of Racial Equality—CORE”, [GINZBURG, p. 145] and his position was later filled by another Jewish attorney, Alan Gartner. In the 1960s, “in CORE, younger and more militant members blocked efforts by [James] Farmer to name one of his Jewish advisers president of CORE, insisting the post be filled with a black.” [KAUFMAN, J., 1988, p. 76] In the same era, the Executive Director of the American Jewish Congress, Will Maslow, was also a CORE national board member. (He resigned in outrage when one African-American CORE official, Clifford Brown, angrily declared that Hitler hadn’t “killed enough” Jews). [UROFSKY, M., 1978, p. 327]


34

Posted by Yawnnn on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:40 | #

JB:

What does the NAACP have to do with the misconception about Owens?  Did the NAACP start the rumor about Hitler and Owens?  You have not proved it.

As for the NAACP pushing Owens for a boycott ... the Jewish source above quotes:

“Schaap also highlights the dispute in the United States over whether to participate in the Berlin Games. Much of this material is available elsewhere, most notably in an online exhibit on the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Web site. But the battle, which featured a pro-boycott letter signed by 20 former U.S. Olympic champions, and a close vote within the Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, will still come as news to many readers, and Schaap tells it well.

Braddock’s Depression-era, rags-to-riches-to-rags-to-riches story gives him an almost saintlike quality, but Owens was a much more complex character. Although Owens displayed some sympathy for the boycott, he generally opposed it, in part because he didn’t want to give up his shot at the Olympics. Nor was Owens’s personal life scandal-free: During the run-up to the games, his flirtations with an actress in California while he had a serious girlfriend and child back in Ohio were well covered in the media.

Schaap even questions some of Owens’s actions during the games themselves. The story has always gone that Owens spoke out against Olympics track coach Lawson Robertson’s decision to leave Marty Glickman and Sam Stoller, the Jewish team members, off the 4x100 relay team. Glickman, later a prominent New York sports broadcaster, always attributed his removal to the desire of the American track coaches and Avery Brundage, the villainous head of the United States Olympic Committee, to appease Hitler and the Nazis. It seems clear that when the decision was announced to the team, Owens opposed it. But as Schaap points out, Owens had campaigned throughout the early part of the games to compete on the team, even though custom and competition — no other relay team was considered a threat to the Americans — argued against it.”

It sounds like the origins of the stories are from Owens himself—to make a quick buck, since the multi-culties would pay a mighty fine dollar to get anti-Hitler stories.  There is no proof that “they” were behind the lie.

However, what’s wrong with Jews supporting the NAACP?  It most certainly was in their interest to do so ... makes sense.  Whites treated blacks (and Jews) like crap ... it would only make sense for them to attempt to change this.  However, this has NOTHING to do with the story about Owens and Hitler.  You are just avoiding the real topic at hand.  PROVE to me that the Jews (they = Jews—if you wish to deny that, then say so now) were responsible for starting the Owens/Hitler nonsense.

And Owens did whoop the master race in the events he entered—maybe America did not, but its negros most certainly did.  (But Germany won more medals—ha ha!).  If I was an outside observer, and heard Hitler’s “Master Race” nonsense, and then watched Owens destroy all of the records, I would deduce that Hitler was a joke too.  This is probably the main origin of this Owne/Hitler debate ... reality.


35

Posted by ben tillman on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:29 | #

You have not proved it.

We’re not interested in meeting your standard of proof.  There is no alternative to our explanation.  Quit trying to waste our time.


36

Posted by JB on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:58 | #

Yawn:

What does the NAACP have to do with the misconception about Owens?  Did the NAACP start the rumor about Hitler and Owens?  You have not proved it.

I’m not so sure either but since Desmond Jones mentioned it I thought I’d post a link to JTR so that those interested in the jews’ relationship to the NAACP would learn more.

Yawn:

It sounds like the origins of the stories are from Owens himself—to make a quick buck, since the multi-culties would pay a mighty fine dollar to get anti-Hitler stories. There is no proof that “they” were behind the lie.

think before you type. the media was looking for anti-Hitler stories, they pressured Owens and he went along with it. Owens didn’t started it (and he himself didn’t came up with the Owens-destroyed-Nazi-racial-theories routine)

Yawn:

However, what’s wrong with Jews supporting the NAACP?  It most certainly was in their interest to do so ... makes sense.  Whites treated blacks (and Jews) like crap ... it would only make sense for them to attempt to change this.

Jews may have been disliked by a lot of americans but they weren’t “treated like crap” cause there was no separate legal category for jews, they were legally whites unlike blacks.

Yawn:

However, this has NOTHING to do with the story about Owens and Hitler.

I know I should have added a “by the way since Desmond Jones mentions the NAACP ...”

Yawn:

You are just avoiding the real topic at hand.  PROVE to me that the Jews (they = Jews—if you wish to deny that, then say so now) were responsible for starting the Owens/Hitler nonsense.

I don’t have their names at hand but I’m pretty sure that if you look at the names of the editors and owners of the major newspapers of the day you would find many jews. For a more recent exposé you can read this :

who rules America ?

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4231

(it needs to be updated because real estate billionaire Sam Zell has recently bought 20+ newspapers including the Chicago Tribune)

and these pages :

Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith member named head of LifeTime Entertainment

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4917

lots of interesting stories quoted here in Chapter 24 of When Victims Rule:

http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/24media2.htm


And clearly no one at ESPN (click to read the article) or elsewhere thought it was important to refute the popular myths associated with Jesse Owens and the 1936 Olympics and instead kept repeating them. They decided telling the truth wasn’t as important as perpetuating politically correct myths that fits their racial bias.

Yawn:

And Owens did whoop the master race in the events he entered—maybe America did not, but its negros most certainly did.  (But Germany won more medals—ha ha!).

Germany did won more medals that all the rest of the world united in the 1936 Olympics so presumably german athletes did beat non-white athletes in some competitions (I don’t have the detailed results at hand)

Yawn:

If I was an outside observer, and heard Hitler’s “Master Race” nonsense, and then watched Owens destroy all of the records, I would deduce that Hitler was a joke too.  This is probably the main origin of this Owne/Hitler debate ... reality.

I don’t know, Germans have the highest average IQ in Europe today so whether or not they’re the fastest runners, who cares ?

Hey I have an idea : let’s go through a point by point comparison of black americans and germans to see which ones are superior in all kinds of categories


37

Posted by JB on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:59 | #

Adolf Hitler, Jesse Owens and the Olympics Myth of 1936
By Rick Shenkman

http://hnn.us/articles/571.html

Everyone knows that at the 1936 Olympics Hitler snubbed Jesse Owens. As the story goes, after Owens won one gold medal, Hitler, incensed, stormed out of Olympic Stadium so he wouldn’t have to congratulate Owens on his victory.

Such a performance would have been perfectly in character, but it didn’t happen. William J. Baker, Owens’s biographer, says the newspapers made up the whole story. Owens himself originally insisted it wasn’t true, but eventually he began saying it was, apparently out of sheer boredom with the issue.

The facts are simple. Hitler did not congratulate Owens, but that day he didn’t congratulate anybody else either, not even the German winners. As a matter of fact, Hitler didn’t congratulate anyone after the first day of the competition. That first day he had shaken hands with all the German victors, but that had gotten him in trouble with the members of the Olympic Committee. They told him that to maintain Olympic neutrality, he would have to congratulate everyone or no one. Hitler chose to honor no one.

Hitler did snub a black American athlete, but it was Cornelius Johnson, not Jesse Owens. It happened the first day of the meet. Just before Johnson was to be decorated, Hitler left the stadium. A Nazi spokesman explained that Hitler’s exit had been pre-scheduled, but no one believes that.

Several other misconceptions about the 1936 Olympics are prevalent. Not only was Owens not rebuffed by Hitler, Owens wasn’t shunned by the German audience at the Berlin stadium either. Baker reports that Owens so captured the imagination of the crowd it gave him several ear-shattering ovations. Owens had been prepared for a hostile reception; a coach had warned him in advance not to be upset by anything that might happen in the stands. “Ignore the insults,” Owens was told, “and you’ll be all right.” Later Owens recalled that he had gotten the greatest ovations of his career at Berlin.

Another popular belief is that the games marked a humiliating moment for the Nazis because a few blacks walked away with a fistful of medals while Hitler had predicted the Teutonic lads would be the big winners, proof of the superman abilities of the white race. In reality, the competition was anything but a German humiliation. It is forgotten that Germany managed to pick up more medals than all the other countries combined. Hitler was pleased with the outcome.


38

Posted by Rnl on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:12 | #

JB’s JTR link was good. The first time I read it I was struck by the following degrading episode, which helps explain some of the Black irritation at their Jewish supporters:

With Jews holding the purse strings to many ostensibly Black organizations, in 1976 Black activist Julian Bond sought the directorship of the NAACP. Although critical of Israel, Bond found it necessary to sign a yearly “Black Americans in Support of Israel (BASIC)” statement “if he was to have any chance of winning the NAACP position, given the powerful influence of Jews within the organization.” [GINZBURG, p. 169]

http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/naacp.htm

***

The Big Lie about the Berlin Olympics
http://library.flawlesslogic.com/owens.htm

Jewish Myths about the Berlin Olympic Games
http://www.vho.org/tr/2004/2/Faurisson168-170.html


39

Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:05 | #

The best part of “Triumph” lies in the new material Schaap unearthed, describing the furious behind-the-scenes machinations over boycotting Hitler’s Olympics. The Call & Post wanted Owens to stay home, calling the Nazis, “the world’s outstanding criminal gang.” The head of the NAACP wrote Owens, pleading with him to “take the high stand that we should rise above personal benefit and help strike a blow at intolerance.”

http://www.cleveland.com/printer/printer.ssf?/base/entertainment/1170495476253970.xml&coll=2&thispage=2

Cleveland’s Call & Post founded by a black man, William O. Walker, to serve Cleveland’s large black ghetto and with close association with the NAACP ran the headline “HITLER SNUBS JESSE”.

“Hitler greets all medalists except Americans,” the front page of the _New York Times_ announced the day after the first competitive events; “Hitler ignores Negro medalists,” ran the headlines the next day. Not by coincidence, the _New York Times_ had earlier led the movement to boycott the Berlin Games. Still, after those initial barrages, the _Times_ largely ceased mentioning the “snub” story. Other newspapers picked it up with a new twist. “HITLER SNUBS JESSE,” read the huge, bold headlines of a black Cleveland paper, _Call and Post_, the day after Owens had won his first medal.

All references except as noted are from _Jesse Owens: an American Life_, by William J. Baker, published by The Free Press (A Division of Macmillan, Inc.), New York, Collier Macmillan Publishers, London, if it really interests you, the book further says:

  Library of Congress Cataloging-in-publication Data

  Baker, William J. (William Joseph)

  Jesse Owens: an American Life.

  Bibliography: p.
  Includes index.
  1. Owens, Jesse, 1913—1980 2. Track and field athletes—United States—Biography. I. Title.
  GV697.09B35 1986 796.4’2'0924 86-4671

  ISBN 0-02-901780-7


40

Posted by Yawnn ... on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:07 | #

Desmond Jones:

You’re the closest so far to providing real proof—you provided information about a Black man’s newspaper starting the rumor (although your link did not say that, I’ll take your word for it)... so, a black newspaper owner SEEMINGLY started the rumor to sell more newspapers to his black audience.  No proof it was “they”—but, he had connections to the NAACP—ok, I’ll go with that ... who was leading the NAACP in 1936?  I could not find this info. 

JB:

I know ‘Who Rules America’ but that does not apply to newspapers in 1936 ... show me the ‘Who Rules America’ of 1936.

Yes, it’s a fact the Germans won more medals and more gold medals, too—but they also had the largest team (Americans had 312 competiting, Germany 348).  Therefore, it’s no surprise they won more medals.  Americans won the most medals and gold medals in track and field events (where the negros dominated).

I never debated the fact that Germans are smarter than negros—that’s an obvious fact.  I’m sticking to the topic at hand—why don’t you try it too.

You also wrote:

“I don’t know, Germans have the highest average IQ in Europe today so whether or not they’re the fastest runners, who cares ?

Hey I have an idea : let’s go through a point by point comparison of black americans and germans to see which ones are superior in all kinds of categories “

Apparently, you care,  since you brought up the Olympics—which, the last time I checked, was an ATHLETIC event.  Therefore, it’s relevant to reply.

Fred—I’m just ignoring you—as you never stick to any topic and you usually just answer your own questions anyway.

Home work for you guys:

1.  Who was the leader of the NAACP in 1936
2.  Was the founder of the Cleveland’s Call & Post black? (source please)

Let’s start with the basics ...


41

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:32 | #

“Fred—I’m just ignoring you—as you never stick to any topic and you usually just answer your own questions anyway.”  (—Yawnnn)

I’m devastated ... I don’t think I can go on ... can someone pass me a box of Kleenex?  (Better make it a kingsize box ... this guy’s very important and if he’s got me on ignore I’ve got a lot of crying to do ...) 

This non-entity is a cross between that extended-phenotype wonder Arcane “the Only Man More Nazi-Obsessed Than Simon Wiesenthal” and that brooding, ever-wallowing-in-self-pity Irishman The “Triple-Digit-IQ-But-Only-Two-To-The-Left-Of-The-Decimal-Point” Other Guy“Yawnnn,” indeed.  In fact, Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz............................

(What a drag on the thread!  Someone wake me up when this character has finally moved on to Katy Couric’s chat room, will you?  Thnx!)


42

Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:35 | #

Dr. William O. Walker became publisher and editor of the Cleveland Call and Post, a black weekly newspaper, in 1932.

Who was the leader of the NAACP in 1936

Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University.

http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/aaohtml/exhibit/0824001.html

J.E. Spingarn, President, first page of White’s letter to Owens, top left corner under National Officers.


43

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:53 | #

“Sinclair Lewis, in his last novel, IT CAN’T HAPPEN HERE, has written what seems to me to be a very sound picture of what may happen.”  (—from Walter White’s draught letter to Jesse Owens, linked in Desmond’s comment)

“Of what may happen”?  Right, and look what actually did happen:  the white race forcibly exterminated as the follow-up to the victory over Germany and Japan.  Maybe we should’ve sat that war out, no?  I think yes — sat it out while we collected our thoughts as to what in the goddamn hell was actually going on.  Things couldn’t have turned out any worse for us if we had — and might conceivably have turned out a whole lot better ...


44

Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:15 | #

The Call & Post also focused, almost exclusively, on the aftermath of the Scottsboro Nine trial.

http://www.huarchivesnet.howard.edu/0002huarnet/ross4.htm

The arrests received little media attention beyond articles and editorials in Alabama and Tennessee newspapers. The accounts of newspapers outside of the region consisted of Associated Press dispatches about the National Guard’s protection of the youths.13 The local media, however, virtually tried and convicted the defendants. The Jackson County Sentinel, one of the two weeklies serving Scottsboro, ran a banner headline that read: “All Negroes Positively Identified by Girls and One White Boy Who Was Held Prisoner with Pistol and Knives While Nine Black Friends Committed Revolting Crime.” Although the Scottsboro Progressive Age declined to print the details of the accusations, its article was far from objective: “... they [the accusers] are being treated by local physicians for injuries sustained when attacked and assaulted by these Negroes.”

[...]

One group that followed the case was the International Labor Defense (ILD), a Communist Party organization. As soon as the trials ended n April, 1931, the ILD offered to assist the defendants in appealing the verdicts. The NAACP also tried to take over the case but could not wrest it from the ILD.

The NAACP was disproportionately represented by Jewish directorship and legal council, at the time and highly dependent on Jewish funding, saving it from bankruptcy in the 1930s. The ILD was an arm of the Communist Party of the USA. Who founded the CP USA? None other than the father of Soviet mole Armand Hammer.

Armand Hammer was named after the “Arm and Hammer” symbol of the Socialist Labor Party, in which his father had a leadership role at one time. (After the Russian Revolution, a part of the SLP under Julius’ leadership split off to become a founding element of the Communist Party of the USA.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armand_Hammer


45

Posted by Yawnn.. on Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:00 | #

D.J.:

Ok, thanks for the research work.  You, unlike others, at least provide some proofs.  So, we have now have established some facts that are undisputable:

1.  The owner of the Call&Post;, which seemingly started the “Hitler Snubs Owens” lie was Black (we need to find an article abstract to prove it conclusively).

2.  The leader of the NAACP at the time of the 1936 Olympics was a Jew. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Elias_Spingarn)

3.  The owner of the Call&Post; had connections to the NAACP (we need proof for this)

4.  Once we have 1-3, we can then conclusivly state that COMMUNIST Jews (not the ‘Jewish Community’ had a big part in making this lie.


46

Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:55 | #

Communist Jews? How do you arrive at that conclusion?

Spingarn was a Profeesor of Literature, Billikof was a philanthropist, Rabbi Stephen Wise, a Zionist rabbi, Lillian Wald, a nurse and Henry Moskowitz, a physician. All are members of the Jewish community and served as board members for the NAACP.

There never will be enough proof for you because you are continually moving the goal posts.


47

Posted by JB on Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:11 | #

Yawn:

Apparently, you care, since you brought up the Olympics—which, the last time I checked, was an ATHLETIC event. Therefore, it’s relevant to reply.

you implied that by winning running competitions negroes somehow demolished Hitler’s talk about the teuton master race (“If I was an outside observer, and heard Hitler’s “Master Race” nonsense, and then watched Owens destroy all of the records, I would deduce that Hitler was a joke too.”), as if the German superiority alleged by Hitler was solely based on their ability to run faster than negroes.

Yawn:

4.  Once we have 1-3, we can then conclusivly state that COMMUNIST Jews (not the ‘Jewish Community’ had a big part in making this lie.

never mind the NYTimes repeating the false story, never mind the media doing the same to smear the Third Reich over the tyniest thing they could find, never mind no major media contradicting the myth they had started decades ago. The bias of the US media is an ethnic bias not primarily a political one


48

Posted by jill starr on Fri, 08 May 2009 01:28 | #

Serbia & Montenegro on Anti- Counterfieting LAws & EU Standards When traveling

throughout Serbia & Montenegro in August for three weeks vacation.


United States :

Serbia & Montenegro on Anti- Counterfieting LAws & EU Standards
When traveling throughout Serbia & Montenegro in August 1999 for three weeks

vacation. I also found Serbia & Montenegro banks to be 100% in accordance with EU

anti-counterfeiting laws & guidelines.

In fact, as an American citizen with a United States Passport, I had an extremely difficult

time when attempting to walk into any bank to exchange my United States Dollars into

either Serbian Dinars and/or Euros. When exchanging money on my vacation, all bills

(U.S. Dollars) had to be crisp and dry, without one tear or crease; I was always asked at

all banks throughout my travels in Serbia & Montenegro to present them with more than

two forms of official photo ID for transactions. When I asked them why, the bank

representatives todl me they have to be extremely careful of counterfeit bills.

In fact, I was starving one day with some friends by the Kosovo border and one bank

would not even exchange my United States Dollars into Euros at all! We were about 10

meters outside of Kosovo where western media was committing gross lies about hundreds

of thousands of refugees being homeless by the borders of ALbanian and Kosovo. I saw

noy one person anywhere insofar as refugees and/or homeless people during my trip in

mid-August 2002.

Yet here I was, in a small ethnic majority Albanian town…anyway, back to my story…

I had been swimming earlier in the morning and had gotten all my money wet. Yet here I

was, an American citizen and even 10 meters outside of Kosovo, not one Montengrin

bank would easily exchange my US Dollars into Euros because it was a bit damp.
And I was hungry!

They would not even exchange it when I showed them my United States valid Passport

along with additional forms of Identification. Talk about banks being overly cautious!

Since it has become a private joke of sorts between myself and my friends what we had to

go back to our hotel rooms often and actually blow-dry our money; almost taking an iron

to iron it perfectly dry, before any bank in either Serbia or Montenegro would exchange

our currency (no matter how much I whined).

WHEN I EXPLAINED TO THE BANK TELLERS THAT I WAS VERY HUNGRY AND

NEEDED TO EXCHANGE MONEYS TO BUY LUNCH, AND, ASKED THEM WHY

ALL THIS ATTENTION TO MONEY EXCHANGES OF VERY SMALL AMOUNTS

UNDER $50- EVEN, I WAS TOLD BECAUSE OF THEIR COUNTRY’S VERY

STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF ANTI-COUNTERFEITING LAWS.

SO WHEREFORE SHOULD NOT SERBIA AT ONCE GAIN ACCEPTANCE IN THE

EU?

INSOFAR AS WAR CRIMES, AS A PERSON WHOM IN AUGUST 2002

TRAVERSED FROM THE SERBIAN/CROATIAN ADRIATIC BORDER TO 10

METERS FROM KOSOVO/MONTENEGRIAN BORDER, I DID NOT SEE ANYONE

ALBANIAN, SERB AND/OR ROMA NOR ANY REFUGEES IN THE COUNTRY

ANYWHERE AT ALL.

EVEN IN THE ETHNIC ALBANIAN TOWN WHERE I BROUGHT MY FRIEND’S

WIFE TO AN ALBANIAN DENTIST AS A SERBIAN LADY FOR DENTAL CARE,

ALL SCHOOL CHILDREN WERE WELL FED, VERY WELL DRESSED AND THEY

WALKED UP TO ME (I TOLD THEM I WAS A US POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENT

AND AMERICAN CITIZEN AND THEY DIDN’T SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT

SERBS AT ALL.) THEY ONLY ALL TOLD ME THEY WANTED TO STUDY IN NEW

YORK ONE DAY. BUT AFTER I TOLD THEM ABOUT MY TERRIBLE

EXPERIENCE BEING THROWN OUT OF THE NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL

RESEARCH IN MANHATTAN FOR MY ANTI NATO VIEWS, THEY TOLD ME

PERHAPS THEY WERE WRONG ABOUT THINKING THERE WAS TRULY

ACADEMIC FREEDOM ON THE USA.

THEN I TOLD THE ETHNIC ALBANIAN STUDENTS NOT TO STUDY IN NEW

YORK CITY BECAUSE OF HOW I ALSO WAS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BY

FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON AND SETON HALL AS WELL ON ACCOUNT OF THE

NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH’S VIOLATING MY DISABILITY

RIGHTS.

WE DISCUSSED HOW THE NEW SCHOOL DID NOT LIKE MY STRONGLY

VOCALIZING MY ANTI-NATO VIEWS TOO AND HOW FDU WOULD NOT

ACCEPT MY MA THESIS WELL.

DURING MY TRIP I DISCOVERED THE AMERICAN AND WESTERN EUROPEAN

NEWS MEDIA WAS LYING TO THEIR PUBLIC LISTENERS.

I MYSELF COULD NOT LOCATE ONE REFUGEE ANYWHERE IN EITHER

COUNTRY , EVEN 10 METERS OUTSIDE OF KOSOVO ITSELF, I FOUND NOT

ONE ETHNIC TENSION AND PEOPLE FROM ALL PARTS OF EUROPE WERE

STAYING IN BUDVA MONTENEGRO WITH ME (GERMANY, NETHERLANDS

ETC.) WE WERE ALL EQUALLY ENJOYING OUR VACATION. THE MAN AT OUR

HOTEL FROM GERMAN PLAYED SOME CHESS WITH ME.

JILL STARR IN NJ

PS: NO ONE RAN UP TO ME FROM ANY ETHNIC NATIONALITY IN ANY ONE

PLACE CRYING TO ME ABOUT WAR CRIMES AND RAPE.

SINCE THAT TIME OF MY 2002 VACATION IN SRBIA AND MONTENEGRO, I

HAVE PERSONALLY ALSO MET WITH SEVERAL UNITED STATES MARINES

STATIONED IN PRISTINA DURING THAT TIME RECENTLY SPENDING TIME

IN NEW JERSEY. THEY ALSO TOLD ME “I WAS NOT REALLY LOOKING JILL

BUT I DID NOT SEE ONE REFUGEES MYSELF AND I WAS STATIONED IN

PRISTINA IN KOSOVO –AND YES THE US AND WESTERN MEDIA MADE UP

SOME OF THE LARGEST LIES IN THE WORLD AND LIES AGAINST SERBIA

AND MONTENEGRO..” THIS WAS SAID TO ME ABOUT 3 WEEKS AGO BY A

SHERIFF’S OFFICER IN PASSAIC COUNTY NEW JERSEY IN 2006.

JLS
Posted by lpcyusa at 5:57 PM 0 comments
http://erbiamontenegro.blogspot.com/

http://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/jillstarrinternationalnewshttp://sites.google.com/

http://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/

http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/

http://obamavideos.bottmer.com/i-am-a-witness-in-the-icc-war-crimes-trials-

10047.barack

http://lpcyu.instablogs.com/feed


http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa


49

Posted by Jill Starr on Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:48 | #

What It’s Like to Chill Out With Whom the Rest of the World Considers As The Most Ruthless Men: Ratko Mladic, Goran Hadzic and Radovan Karadzic (+) Confessions of a Female War Crimes Investigator By Jill Louise Starr NJ USA

https://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/what-it-s-like-to-chill-out-with-whom-the-rest-of-the-world-considers-as-the-most-ruthless-men-in-the-world-ratko-mladic-and-radovan-karadzic-confessions-of-a-female-war-crimes-investigator

          Retrospectively, it was all so simple, natural and matter of fact being on a boat restaurant in Belgrade, sitting with, laughing, drinking a two hundred bottle of wine and chatting about war and peace while Ratko Mladic held my hand.  Mladic,  a man considered the world’s most ruthless war criminal since Adolf Hitler, still at large and currently having a five million dollar bounty on his head for genocide by the international community.  Yet there I was with my two best friends at the time, a former Serbian diplomat, his wife, and Ratko Mladic just chilling. There was no security, nothing you’d ordinarily expect in such circumstances. Referring to himself merely as, Sharko; this is the story of it all came about.

‘’‘Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case By Jill Starr

http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa
(The Documentary Secret United Nations ICC Meeting Papers Scanned Images)

https://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/irrefutable-proof-icty-is-corrupt-court-irrefutable-proof-the-hague-court-cannot-legitimately-prosecute-karadzic-case

This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr Karadzic and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.

Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United Nations member states having a substantial conversations, and, openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan Karazdic and others.

I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding.

Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country’s proposal was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly believes if we contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that ought to give us and other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its decisions.”

((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of censoring the country representative from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery for international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a ”totally legitimate topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked! The idea was “let’s discuss it.” “It’s a great topic to discuss.”

Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did not. The point here is, bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally legitimate topic instead of an illegitimate topic which it is in the meeting that I attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent international criminal court.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

In particular., since “Spain” was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and verdicts in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, “Spain” must have already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was “socially acceptable” for conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing the ICTY and ICC before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student.

SPAIN’s diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is, disgusting morally!SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.”

I represented the state interests’ of the Former Yugoslavia, in Diplomat Darko Trifunovic’s absence in those meetings and I am proud to undertake this effort on Serbia’s behalf.

==================================================================================




Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Austin Chronicle: The US Heartland’s Fury Seethes
Previous entry: Genetic structure and Outbreeding Depression

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:05. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:06. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Sun, 28 Apr 2024 12:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:07. (View)

Landon commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Sun, 28 Apr 2024 04:48. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:45. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:11. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:14. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:05. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:43. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:54. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:03. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:26. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:26. (View)

Landon commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:36. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:58. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:26. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:57. (View)

Landon commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:51. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:18. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 07:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:48. (View)

weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:24. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:54. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:12. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:44. (View)

affection-tone