Did we kill Jews, Daddy?

Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 27 January 2008 00:03.

Perhaps a reader with a better memory than me can name the late John Tyndall’s only work of fiction in which, I seem to recall, British shoppers carried home plastic bags bearing the injunction, “Remember the Holocaust”.

From a propaganda perspective, that dulling degree of ubiquity still awaits us. But the same tawdry mechanicalness, the same tendency to glaze the eyes attends the words penned for Gordon Brown in yesterday’s Daily Telegraph:-

We must not forget the Holocaust

Imagine, Remember, Reflect, React: together, these words define tomorrow’s Holocaust Memorial Day. Why imagine? Because the sheer scale of the Holocaust numbs us to its individual realities: the captivity, suffering and death of six million people, 1.5 million of them children, each with family, a history and unique emotions.

... As a boy, I was well aware of the struggle and sacrifices of the Jewish people. My father, a Church of Scotland minister, led parties of visitors to Israel twice a year for more than 20 years and wanted me to understand what the Holocaust meant.

Why remember? Because, more than 60 years after the liberation of Belsen, Treblinka and Auschwitz, and as the last of the survivors now grow old, we simply cannot afford to forget.

... Each generation must learn and understand the dark forces and culpable failures that allowed prejudice, discrimination and persecution to lead to a vast programme of mass slaughter that spanned a continent.

And as we reflect again on these events, we must react to them too, to ensure that “Never Again” is not just a slogan, but a reality.

Only by systematic efforts - such as the Holocaust Educational Trust’s Lessons from Auschwitz programme and compulsory teaching about the Holocaust in secondary schools - can we maintain a common knowledge of what happened, celebrate the courage of the few who fought it and learn the lessons for the future.

That is why we have provided funds to encourage hundreds of pupils from every school in the country to visit Auschwitz and learn of the tragedies that follow when people do not stand up. Last year 3,000 pupils travelled to Auschwitz, this year 4,000 - every secondary school offering at least two pupils the chance to see its dark truths.

Well, for one, I would not permit my daughter to be propagandised in this way. She won’t be visiting Auschwitz. As a father I do all I can to explain to her the strategic value of the Holocaust narrative for Jewry, and to protect her from the libel on her blood and on the blood of all Europe’s children in those unjust words: “Each generation must learn and understand the dark forces and culpable failures that allowed prejudice, discrimination and persecution to lead to a vast programme of mass slaughter that spanned a continent.”

I suppose it is probable that, being a politician, Brown is lying about his awareness as a boy of the “struggle and sacrifices of the Jewish people”. After all, Jewish donors keep his party afloat and, of course, “befriend” it (as they “befriend” the Conservatives). Brown has no alternative but to be an enthusiastic Judeophile and devotee of the “magnificent” Jewish homeland (as Cameron has to be, too).

Realpolitik - mere moral or intellectual weakness - would, then, be some kind of fig-leaf for the man. But if he is sincere ... if he really believes that the hearts of English children hold “dark forces” - some original sin of hate of the semite - then we are faced with something quite different. We are faced, in Brown, with a Judaised soul in which the normal empathy for kind, and even for the children of kind, has been perverted. It’s true, of course, that at this level, the level of foundational loyalty, one cannot serve Jewry and kind. Jewry’s profound unwillingness, as expressed in the exploitation of the Holocaust, to act peacefully towards our children simply does not leave that possibility open.

The moral of the story, on this Holocaust Memorial Day in Britain, is that we should cooly explain the hateful uses to which the narrative is put. We owe Jewry and Mr Brown and the political Establishment only that.

Tags: That Question Again

Comments:

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:28 | #

“Jewish donors keep his party afloat and, of course, ”befriend” it (as they ”befriend” the Conservatives). Brown has no alternative but to be an enthusiastic Judeophile and devotee of the “magnificent” Jewish homeland (as Cameron has to be, too).” (—from the entry)

Precisely. You can stop right there: you’ve got your explanation in its entire simplicity. There’s nothing more to it. The ones who pay expect certain things in return. If you want to keep getting paid, you supply what’s expected.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:33 | #

We’re not just “back to square-one,” we’ve never left it.

Posted by Englander on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:39 | #

The most obvious lesson that the Holocaust can teach us is that things can turn sour when two or more ethnic groups share the same living space.
Oh, and Treblinka was closed down, not liberated.

Posted by Sally on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 06:19 | #

While Gordon Brown said, ” “Because the sheer scale of the Holocaust numbs us to its individual realities: the captivity, suffering and death of six million people..,” in fact the number six million has been sold three times in the 20th century. We are all familiar with the post-WWII holocaust pornography that features the number six million, but here are reputable quotes from Jewish leaders pushing the same number in 1900 and in 1919. Indeed, it has become the greatest story overtold.

===================

6,000,000 in 1900:

Rabbi Wise’s Address
New York Times
June 11, 1900, p. 7

Rabbi Wise said, in part:

‘The day will never come when I will care less for Zion, when there will be
anyone who will strive more for the glorious ideals of Zionism.

‘Two great conventions of Jews are being held tonight. In Chicago, there is
a conference of charities called together by men who minister to the wants
of the poor. They have assembled to see that too much charity is not given
to the unworthy. Their purpose is right. But ours is the greater charity. We
have assembled not to see that the Jew does not get too much, but that every
Jew shall get the right to live.

‘There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of
Zionism. They come not to beg, but ask for that which is higher than all
material things. They seek to have satisfied the unquenchable thirst after
the ideal. They ask to become once again the messengers of right, justice,
and humanity.

==================

6,000,000 in 1919:

Felix M. Warburg Tells Sad Plight of Jews
Felix M. Warburg Says They Were the Worst Sufferers in War.

The New York Times
September 29, 1919, p. 7

Felix M. Warburg, Chairman of the Joint Distribution Committee of American
Funds for Jewish War Sufferers, who returned several days ago from a trip to
Europe for that organization, made public yesterday some of his findings.

‘The successive blows of contending armies have all but broken the back of
European Jewry,’ he said, ‘and have reduced to tragically unbelievable
poverty, starvation and disease about 6,000,000 souls, or half the Jewish
population of the earth.

‘The Jewish people throughout Eastern Europe, by sheer accident of
geography, have suffered more from the war than any other element of the
population. The potential vitality and the capacity for self-help that
remains to those people after the last five years is amazing to me.’

=================

Posted by Blue Baron on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 06:24 | #

Banks are failing in Britain and France, the US is sliding into an economic morass and savages are rampaging in Kenya… so what is on the agenda of world Jewry… ? Another holocaust museum.

Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:09 | #

6 million 3 times:

666

Who would have thought that Jews might be the Beast of the Antichrist?

Posted by shoahshueme on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:28 | #

There’s no business like Shoah business
Like no business I know-ah!
Everything about it is appealing,
Everything the dumb goys will allow
Nowhere can you get that happy feeling
When you are stealing that extra thou’!

Chorus:

There’s no people like Shoah people,
They smile when they are low-ah!
It may be a turkey, but it just won’t fold!
Line up all the goyim, rebuke and scold!
Every day it earns us more sacks of gold!
Let’s go on with the Shoah!

There’s no business like Shoah business,
And I tell you it’s so-ah!
Shaming all the goyim is so thrilling!
Standing out in front on opening nights!
Smiling as you watch the benches filling!
And there’s “Team Auschwitz” up there in lights!

CHORUS

Let’s go on with the Shoah!
Let’s go on with the Shoah!
The Shoah!
The Shoah!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:06 | #

I vote we get Shoahshueme to sign on here as a regular blogger!!

Posted by Lurker (Mk II) on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:30 | #

As far as I can see, “Holocaust Memorial Day” in Britain was almost ignored this year despite the Great Helmsman’s awful warnings, and it only began in 2000. No mention at my church. A few services and ceremonies around the country, but mostly for and by the usual suspects- all chiefs and no Indians.

Suppose they gave a pity party and nobody came? Oy yoy, no collection!

The BBC seems to have blanked HMD as well, except for a programme on Radio 3 about “degenerate music” banned by the Nazis.

Although the Muslims agreed to join in this time, having complained that HMD focused ezclusively on the Shoah and other genocides were “dissed”, the great British public seems to feel (a) it was all a long time ago and we’ve got our own atrocities to worry about; (b) maybe it wasn’t quite as bad as all that, and anyway lots of people suffered in World War Two; (c) we were fighting to stop it, but now we’re being treated as if we were the perpetrators; (d) grass grows over the memory of other old crimes, so why can’t we move on?

Such shameful, hateful, heretical thoughts must evidently be stamped out by a bigger, more expensive propaganda campaign to ensure that everyone in the remaining n history of the world is aware of the Worst Crime Ever, and that the gentile 99pc of them spend the rest of their lives apologising and making recompense for it.

Posted by VLC on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:09 | #

it’s always Six Million. no more no less

Posted by Seane-Anna on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:53 | #

I can’t comprehend how supposedly Christian people could be so callous about the mass murder of 6,000,000 Jews. What is it with you anti-Semites? Have you forgotten that the man you claim to believe in as your Savior was a Jew? And what’s this stuff about “Jewry and kind”? Jews are not a different kind. Most of them are white, with eyes as blue and hair as blond as those of any “Aryan”. Yes, the term “Jew” can refer to a cultural and ethnic group as well as a religious group, but if you then conclude that that makes Jews a totally different kind you must also conclude that the Irish are a totally different kind from the English, and the Poles are a totally different kind from the Russians, and the Swedes are a totally different kind from the Spaniards. I mean, if being of another ethnicity and/or culture makes people different kinds then there is no such thing as a white race, but only different kinds that happen to be light-skinned. Of course, none of you here are going to agree with that.

I happen to be a black woman who’s opposed to ALL racism, including racism against whites. Sadly, it’s whites like you who give the anti-white Left all the ammuniton it needs to wage it’s war against whites, the civilization they built, and the faith most of them at least nominally believe in. What you fail to realize is that what happened to the Jews six decades ago can just as easily happen to YOU if all of humanity doesn’t take the time to stop and remember that the capacity for murderous hatred exists in all of us and, therefore, threatens all of us. Each and every one of us can be declared “unfit” by someone more powerful than we are and then dealt with accordingly. That, and not creating sympathy for Jews, is what remembering the Holocaust is really all about.

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:47 | #

“I can’t comprehend how supposedly Christian people could be so callous about the mass murder of 6,000,000 Jews.”

Indeed, and because it doesnt seem quite possible maybe that means something.

The first time I began to look into the holocaust as a total believer in the official narrative, the first thing I wondered was how the 6 million figure was arrived at. I thought it would be straightforward enough, what with all those detailed records the nazis kept, no-one in the right mind could deny the reality. And thats where I hit the first problem…

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:57 | #

Christians? We are the sons of Europe not sons of the Church - though some of us may be, of course. But that would be a private matter. Our ethnicity is a public, collective issue, something we hold in common that necessitates an exclusivity you seem unable to accept. Accept it. Our ethnicity does not include Jews.

Neither are we this daft thing “anti-semitic”. “Anti-semitic” is a slur, a name-crime ... like “racist” or “white racist”. It is used by Jews with the intention of instilling guilt in our people, and thence the incapacity to defend ourselves from assault on our lands, our resources, our women, our culture etc by other ethnies who do not belong among us - yours, for example.

The Holocaust narrative is a highly significant aspect of this programme. Quite independent of any historical events in Germany and Poland between 1941 and 1945, it is exploited as an ethnic tool. Read again what Lurker (MkII) has written. There is truth in that.

Incidentally, if you are really so concerned that no peoples suffer under the lash of irrational ethnic hatred nor find themselves displaced, dispossessed and scheduled for the genetic dustbin, maybe you should start advocating against the postmodern dispensation, and for clearing non-whites out of white living space. We only ask to be left alone to live according to our own lights. It isn’t an extreme request. It is natural, and a right of all peoples. Those who cannot tolerate it are themselves racist, no?

Posted by Prozium on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:11 | #

I can’t comprehend how supposedly Christian people could be so callous about the mass murder of 6,000,000 Jews. What is it with you anti-Semites? Have you forgotten that the man you claim to believe in as your Savior was a Jew?

I’m an atheist/racial materialist.

And what’s this stuff about “Jewry and kind”? Jews are not a different kind. Most of them are white, with eyes as blue and hair as blond as those of any “Aryan”. Yes, the term “Jew” can refer to a cultural and ethnic group as well as a religious group,

Jews are a distinct non-Western ethnic/racial/religious group. They cluster at the genetic level with other Levantine populations like Syrians and Palestinians.

but if you then conclude that that makes Jews a totally different kind you must also conclude that the Irish are a totally different kind from the English, and the Poles are a totally different kind from the Russians, and the Swedes are a totally different kind from the Spaniards.

I don’t think so. Historically speaking, Jews have been the quintessential outsiders/aliens residing within the West. They cannot be compared to the Irish or Swedes.

I mean, if being of another ethnicity and/or culture makes people different kinds then there is no such thing as a white race, but only different kinds that happen to be light-skinned. Of course, none of you here are going to agree with that.

Jews are non-white.

I happen to be a black woman who’s opposed to ALL racism, including racism against whites.

I’m a white male who identifies as a ‘racialist’ - someone who believes in the existence of racial differences and their relevance to public policy. I see nothing objectionable about racial prejudice.

Sadly, it’s whites like you who give the anti-white Left all the ammuniton it needs to wage it’s war against whites, the civilization they built, and the faith most of them at least nominally believe in.

The war against whites you speak of is tolerated only because most whites have bought into “anti-racism.” It ends the day people like us come to power.

What you fail to realize is that what happened to the Jews six decades ago can just as easily happen to YOU if all of humanity doesn’t take the time to stop and remember that the capacity for murderous hatred exists in all of us and, therefore, threatens all of us.

I would love nothing better than to see non-whites initiate a race war against anti-racist white liberals. That would be hilarious.

Each and every one of us can be declared “unfit” by someone more powerful than we are and then dealt with accordingly. That, and not creating sympathy for Jews, is what remembering the Holocaust is really all about.

The Jews got what they deserved.

Posted by weston on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:34 | #

“Most of them are white, with eyes as blue and hair as blond as those of any “Aryan”. ”

This is a ridiculous claim. At most, this is true for a very small minority of jews. Upon meeting a group of 24 new colleagues, I predicted with 100% accuracy the seven people in the group that were jewish. This is without getting anyone’s last name or conversing about anything other than trivial small talk. Jews tend to look middle-eastern, even when they have had substantial European admixture.

I even recall Larry Auster berating one of his correspondents because the correspondent didn’t know that Scooter Libby was jewish based solely on his appearance.

Quote:

“The following exchange took place between me and a friend who, though a native New Yorker, has, to my exasperation, some weird block against being able to identify Jews from their names or physical appearance. The insulting language should be understood as friendly banter.

Correspondent writes:

I didn’t realize that Libby is Jewish.

LA replies:

“Lewis Libby” not Jewish? _____, you’re pathetic.

Correspondent replies:

I’m an American, innocent of Old World rivaries and hatreds.

LA replies:

HA HA.

That’s really funny. Your sense of humor makes up for your idiocy—almost. ”

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/008232.html

Also note from that exchange what a ridiculous ass Auster is.

Don’t let Auster realize you think there’s no difference in physical appearance between jews and Europeans, he’ll call you “pathetic” and an idiot.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:08 | #

Yes, the term “Jew” can refer to a cultural and ethnic group as well as a religious group, but if you then conclude that that makes Jews a totally different kind you must also conclude that the Irish are a totally different kind from the English, and the Poles are a totally different kind from the Russians, and the Swedes are a totally different kind from the Spaniards. I mean, if being of another ethnicity and/or culture makes people different kinds then there is no such thing as a white race, but only different kinds that happen to be light-skinned. Of course, none of you here are going to agree with that.

I will.

In that context, there’s no such thing as the black race, as Marcus Garvey discovered, or Kenyans are discovering, or the yellow race, as the Chinese or Koreans discovered when invaded by Japan.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:14 | #

Have you forgotten that the man you claim to believe in as your Savior was a Jew?

Yes, but without Europeans, Christianity would be nothing but another forgotten Jewish sect.

Posted by Uncle Jim on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:01 | #

The figures are only a detail if it was one million or six million it was still targeted industrialised murder of a people who were well integrated into German society. They were so German that even the SS did not like shooting them. SS officers reported it caused “morale problems” which is one of the reasons they switched to gas for extermination.

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:22 | #

Prozium: The Jews got what they deserved.

By the same lights, Jews often claim that they deserve their present material and political ascendency - albeit an ascendency, as we know, achieved through hyper-aggressive strategies of ethnic advancement. “Deserve” has nothing to do with it. There is no objective moral measure at work here, beyond the right to life itself (which all people equally enjoy individually and collectively, and regardless of ethnicity).

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:40 | #

Unclie Jim: the SS did not like shooting them.

These men saw themselves as the spiritual as well as the military elite of the German Volk - examplars of Aryan courage and honour to all future generations. Shooting defenceless Jews in cold blood was no kind of work for men of such conviction. Pride, above common humanity, will have caused any “morale problems”.

The gas issue is for others to debate. I am yet to be convinced.

Posted by Uncle Jim on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:10 | #

Guessedworker

The source of this is the minutes of the meeting on the “Final solution” that was chaired by Heydrich in 1942. I may be wrong but the implication was they did not like shooting German Jews who, regardless of Nazi propaganda were ordinary Germans like themselves. Polish and other East European Jews they were not so bothered about. One could poke around this but apart from patriotic phsycos most people do not like killing people from their own class and background particularly if they speak the same language.

This was only one of the reasons for the gas, another was simple logistics it needed less labour and had a much faster through-put.

Posted by mya on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:27 | #

This is disgusting,
you people are racist, horrible bigots and if a place called hell exists you will all have your spots picked out there for you by the god you state your claims in accordance with

Posted by Prozium on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:57 | #

This is disgusting,
you people are racist, horrible bigots and if a place called hell exists you will all have your spots picked out there for you by the god you state your claims in accordance with

We seem to be averaging about one of these a day now.

Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:31 | #

The Jews were “so German” that they spoke Yiddish at home. It is ridiculous to state that Jews in Germany were “well integrated into German society” unless you believe that cockroaches are well-integrated into your kitchen. ‘Uncle Jim’ has some reading to do and a good place to begin would be ‘Hoax of the Twentieth Century’ by Prof. Arthur Butz.

Posted by Uncle Jim on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:12 | #

Yiddish was derived from German 1000 years ago. It became the common international language of scattered Jewish communities throughout Europe in the same way Latin was once the common international language of European Christians. Whether they spoke Yiddish at home or not I am not qualified to say but if they did at least they spoke standard German outside.

This is more than can be said for the new immigrants who unlike Seane-Anna above neither have nor want any understanding of, let alone acceptance of, European Christian norms. They demand – and get – the right to have everything done in their “own” languages and carry on with the illegal practices of the places they are “fleeing” from. These include, halal slaughter, inbred marriages, forced marriages, polygamy, wife beating and the refusal to educate women to name just a few.

Posted by Al Ross on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:30 | #

Yiddish, which is a dialect of German corrupted with input taken from the Aramaic used by Jews in the Middle ages together with some Hebrew, is too crude and imprecise a language to be used in discourse on topics requiring philosophical and intellectual terms and that is why educated Jews employed German outside the home - not for any spurious purposes of assimilation.

Perhaps it would be wrong of me to infer from his last paragraph that ‘Uncle Jim’ would tolerate the Third World invasion of Euroman’s territory as long as the invaders politely attempted to assimilate. I certainly hope so.

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:01 | #

From the Daily Mail today:-

Two pupils from every school in England to be sent to Auschwitz in Government-funded visits

Two sixth-formers from every school in England are to go on Government-funded visits to Auschwitz.

The aim is ensure the lessons of Nazi genocide are never forgotten.

Schools Minister Jim Knight wants the chosen teenagers to educate their classmates about the Holocaust when they return.

Each will meet an Auschwitz survivor, be shown around the camp’s barracks and crematoria and see the registration documents of inmates and piles of hair, shoes, clothes and other items seized by the Nazis.

They will hear first-hand accounts of life in the camp in Poland, where more than a million Jews and other minority groups were put to death. The visit will end with a memorial service for the dead.

The Education Department will set aside £200 towards each student’s trip. Schools must find a further £100.

Pilot versions of the scheme have been running since 2006. It will now be on a permanent footing and receive £4.65million funding a year until 2011.

Ministers hope to provide further cash in future if the project is a success.

“The Holocaust was one of the most significant events in world history,” Mr Knight said.

“Six million people died, not for what they had done, but simply for who they were.

“It was not hot-blooded brutality, it happened in a very planned way, with some people designing the process of death and others carrying it out.

“Every young person should have an understanding of this.

“We want them to see it, not as an isolated period of history, but as something real and something that can happen again and again if we let it, like it has happened since in the Balkans, in Cambodia and in Rwanda.”

Students taking part will fly to Poland and back in a day, leaving at 5am and returning at 10pm.

They will go first to Oswiecim, the small town next to Auschwitz, where there was a Jewish community before the Second World War.

They will then see the remains of the gas chambers where the vast majority of victims were murdered.

Before their trips the students will attend a seminar where they will hear from a survivor of the camp.

On their return, they will attend a second seminar to reflect on the experience.

Karen Pollock, chief executive of the Holocaust Education Trust, which is running the visits, said: “We are very aware that there’s going to be a time when there aren’t any survivors left to go into schools.

“The young people will become eye-witnesses themselves.

“For a lot of them it’s life-changing. They suddenly realise what they value and see it is important to challenge prejudice today.

“We don’t want young people wandering around the camp and sobbing. It’s not about making them cry, it’s about helping them to reflect on what it means.”

The Holocaust Education Trust has also produced a DVD containing testimonies of survivors, which schools can order.

The DVD, which took four years to develop, features 18 witnesses to the Holocaust and survivors of the associated Nazi eugenics programme including Roma and Sinti gypsies, Jehovah’s Witnesses and political prisoners.

Posted by John O'Rourke on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:05 | #

It was wrong. Millions of people died, as has been quoted here, for who they were, not what they did. In Northern Ireland, the IRA murdered Protestants for who they were - farmers, milkmen, postmen - under the guise of a terrorist campaign against the British. Many many fathers or eldest sons of families were gunned down in remote border areas in order to kill that family line, and force Protestants out of certain areas. I condemn it against Protestants and I condemn it against Jews.
It’s funny however how certain countries, and in particular Ireland - can talk Peace, and Remembrance, and travel to Auschwitz and stand in line with heads bowed, conveniently forgetting how Ireland admired Hitler and how they remained neutral - playing their cards against both Britain and Germany - trying to keep in with America fighting the Nazis but trying not to offend Hitler who they hoped would deliver a United Ireland once he had beaten Britain. To this day, they refer to the Second World War as “The Emergency”, not as a war against Nazism. The Irish Government sent a message of condolence to the German Government on the death of Hitler, and many many German Nazis found sanctuary in Ireland after the war. It is interesting to note that the Irish Army wore German army uniforms - and the classic German steel helmets emblazoned with an Eire badge - up until 1941 when the USA came into the war. Yet, today, they gloss over all this, and expect us to forgive and forget, however they themselves cannot forgive and forget the British.
Consequently, while I believe that the IRA are scum who should be wiped off the face of the earth, I cannot tar all Irish with the same brush - nor can I look back at millions of innocent Jews and say they got what they deserved, simply because some of them may have had politics others did not agree with.

Posted by wjg on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:54 | #

After several paragraphs lamenting the very rare backlash against god’s blameless and perfect little pets - and conveniently forgetting the catastrophic physical and spiritual destruction of Europe - JO ends with this gem:

“Consequently, while I believe that the IRA are scum who should be wiped off the face of the earth…”

Whereas the IRA is one political faction within the Irish people which does not speak for them as a whole, Jewry (the collective political force of the Jewish people) does act very monolithically at least in regards to its greatest perceived enemy - Europe. And the fruit of that political will can best be described as genocide. For better or worse the Nazis did accurately understand the relationship between the individual and the collective as it relates to the international race.

Even though Jewry is to the West a million times more toxic than what the IRA is to Great Britain JO spares them the same judgment. The Stockholm Syndrome still amazes me.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:28 | #

“Why not send them to Runnymede?” asks a log entry up this morning over at BrusselsJournal.com. That’s like the Red Indian who asked, circa 1948 or so, “When are the Indians depicted in Hollywood movies going to start winning some battles?” and was told, “When the Indians start making the movies.” English schoolchildren will get sent to Runnymede when Englishmen once again own the British Labour Party. Right now another ethnicity owns it. What was that proverb again, about “pipers,” “tunes,” something like that? I can’t remember it but I’m sure it’ll come to me .... Something about “paying” if memory serves? ... it’ll come to me ...

Posted by GoyAmongYou on Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:07 | #

[...]

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/008232.html

Also note from that exchange what a ridiculous ass Auster is.

Don’t let Auster realize you think there’s no difference in physical appearance between jews and Europeans, he’ll call you “pathetic” and an idiot.

Posted by weston on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 at 08:34 PM

Don’t miss the Punch Line :

LA replies:

[...]

And by the way, if anyone reading this is thinking, “There goes Auster again, concerned about anti-Semitism, but not about anti-black racism,” the fact is that there is no comparison between the two. There is no anti-black speech in the right wing today that objectifies and dehumanizes blacks the way the anti-Semites routinely objectify and dehumanize Jews, so that any statement of any Jew (or any person of Jewish ancestry) on any subject is seen as having no rational content but as an expression of pure tribalism (e.g., “Auster is a jew, of course he thinks Libby is innocent”), or, worse, as simply the expression of a genetically commanded war waged by the Jews against gentile whites in order to gain power over them and destroy them.

The irony is that in reducing Jews (or “jews,” as they charmingly call them) to tribal automatons incapable of objective thought, the anti-Semites reveal that their own state of consciousness is that of tribal automatons incapable of objective thought, which they then project onto the Jews.

Bottom Line :

Blame (non-jooish) WHITEEEEEEEY !!!
Man, these guys are no better than the Nigras :p

...

Posted by GoyAmongYou on Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:32 | #

There are more funny Punch Lines hidden in there, check them out :

[...] The irony is that in reducing Jews (or “jews,” as they charmingly call them) [...]

Previous paragraph :

And by the way, if anyone reading this is thinking, “There goes Auster again, concerned about anti-Semitism, but not about anti-black racism,” the fact is that there is no comparison between the two. There is no anti-black speech in the right wing today that objectifies and dehumanizes blacks the way the anti-Semites routinely objectify and dehumanize Jews, so that any statement of any Jew (or any person of Jewish ancestry) on any subject is seen as having no rational content but as an expression of pure tribalism (e.g., “Auster is a jew, of course he thinks Libby is innocent”), or, worse, as simply the expression of a genetically commanded war waged by the Jews against gentile whites in order to gain power over them and destroy them.

No comment

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:51 | #

And I was waiting for you to say, “Bring back capital punishment.”

Comments:

Post a comment:

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Links

MR Central & News

Comments