FGM and the future of the West “I had a beautiful life, but at the same time a tough one,” says former model and “Bond girl”, UN ambassador and global campaigner against female genital mutilation, Waris Dirie. She is interviewed in today’s Telegraph on the occasion of the launch of her new book, Desert Children. Working with co-writers she has produced two similar books and found time to establish an Austrian-based foundation dedicated to women, like her, who have suffered FGM. It is a noble endeavour professionally pursued. Her journey to this extraordinary life began, of course, in a child’s terror:-
Single-motherhood aside, one can only applaud this woman’s deeds. The parallels with the Somali-born Dutch MP, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, are obvious. But Dirie has avoided pure politics and avoided, too, Hirsi Ali’s murderously hazardous conflation of violence against women with the Islamic faith. What we are left with, causally speaking, is not faith as such but culture - the brutality of custom and general backwardness of a large swathe of the peoples inhabiting the Islamic world. FGM is carried out in 25 African countries (not including 14 where it is officially but ineffectually banned), in Middle East countries such as Yemen, United Arab Emirates and Egypt, and in Indonesia and Malaysia. According to the WHO there are an estimated 130 million women who have been subjected to FGM, and these include tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands in Europe. Dirie insists that the practise is going on covertly throughout multicultural Europe - and, no doubt, in America and Canada. In that case, it is the single most disgusting and unacceptable product of all the disgusting and unacceptable products of multiculturalism. Laws against it are on the statute book in America, Canada, Britain, France and Switzerland. But local laws do not instantly abolish deeply-rooted tribal customs. How deeply rooted? Well, the WHO estimated in 1984 that up to 70% of Liberian women were victims of FGM. So widespread a practise can’t just be wished away by well-meaning legislators. Anyway, rendered unlawful it will only retire into yet more recondite corners of association, tradition and belief. All poor migrants cling tenaciously to their traditional selves – none more so than Moslems. That is their sincere desire, and we arrogant Westerners have not the slightest chance of “assimilating” them out of it. Before the neocon adventurism in Iraq it was widely taken as read among right liberals, especially libertarians, that cosmopolitanism and the “market forces” of Western consumerism would do just that. These backward peoples would be quite seduced from their backward faiths and backward cultures. In no time at all their backward games with rusty razor blades would seem as alien to them as they do to us. Hip geeks and bohos, Popperian individualists and all-round, SW3 party folk, all with scarcely noticeable black or brown skin, would emerge from the deserts of the world to garland our dull lives. For ever and ever the social efficacy of free enterprise would be proved. Wrong. Human life is altogether more sombre and profound and impossibly complex in its twisting course. We know it now, post the Iraqi insurgency – and even more post 7/7. Warring Iraqis and sullen immigrants alike do not want to be us exactly, living our Western lives with our Western values. They do not look up to us and, in most cases, have not done so since we quit governing them. They despise us, actually, and do not see our Western freedoms as freedoms at all, but vices – and none see that more than Moslems. Our material advancement, our prosperity, our lands – yes, these they want. But our culture, no … at least, not if they are in possession of one of their own. From Islamic terrorism and from science we are slowly learning that culture does not arrive out of the blue. It is not separate from the human characteristics it expresses. It is a people’s act of living, and when we think of Western culture we should think of it solely as the Western peoples’ act of living. We cannot take as our guide to others’ potentialities the behaviour of rare birds like Dirie or Hirsi Ali. We have to assess not a few talented individuals but tribal populations with no traditions akin to ours and no inate qualities by which the gap might be bridged. The gap will not be bridged. FGM will probably not only survive the best efforts of Waris Dirie, it will survive our attempts to stamp it out. It is a sobering fact of present-day demographics that it may therefore survive us, too. Comments:2
Posted by seelow heights on Tue, 01 Nov 2005 06:24 | # How did a basically African custom spread to Indonesia and Malaysia? Somehow I don’t think those countries are taking in African immigrants. Maybe evidence of a worldwide (further?) barbarization of Islam? 3
Posted by john fitzgerald on Tue, 01 Nov 2005 06:34 | # An “act of living”, I like it. Characteristics precede culture so culture is an expression of a peoples characteristics. 4
Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 01 Nov 2005 08:44 | # Dearieme, thanks and well-spotted. Posting late at night again, I’m afraid. Seelow, Good question, and Islam may serve as a carrying agent to south Asian populations. But male circumcision is more widespread still and not confined to Islam or to Africa, as we all know. Islam is a young religion but male circumcision, certainly, is very old. I would expect both varieties to have arisen together. So, personally, I think the cultural explanation for them among tribes of double-digit mean IQ - Ashkenazics excepted - carries more sway than the religious one. In any event, Moslems in countries such as Turkey, where FGM is not present, will quickly point out that there is no requirement for it in Islam. 5
Posted by Bo Sears on Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:54 | # FGM? What about MGM? “FGM will probably not only survive the best efforts of Waris Dirie, it will survive our attempts to stamp it out. It is a sobering fact of present-day demographics that it may therefore survive us, too.” (Guessedworker) Cultural practices like FGM can carry on it a Westernized culture every bit as well as the equally odious barbaric cultural practice of MGM. Let’s see now, just who are the cultural carriers of MGM? Have they reformed themselves on exposure to Westernized culture? Why would we expect other peoples to enter Westernized cultures and make drastic changes to conform to us when the MGM carriers have not bothered to do so? Post a comment:
Next entry: No Piccadilly in Baghdad
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) Computer say no by Guessedworker on Thursday, 09 May 2024 15:17. (View) |
Posted by dearieme on Tue, 01 Nov 2005 04:15 | #
“Dessert Children”: now that’s what I call right-wing!