Posted by Same Old Feelin' on Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:42 | #

Same Old Feelin’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whYbBrqACCM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-JZ1F9dWFo

Posted by KyleC*nt on Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:28 | #

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.626217

Believe it or not, they are stupid enough to take this study at face value:

Tim Bel-murdoch and Kyle Cunt cite this Jewish survey saying that 50 percent of young Poles are viewing pro Hitler sites…

first of all, what is a pro Hitler site?

secondly, what are they looking for there?

lastly, of course, who is behind this study?

I sometimes look at pro Hitler sites, or sites that have pro Hitler sympathies (and am hardly pro Hitler as everyone knows).

But Kyle Cunt and Tim Bel marduk take this so called study at face value and say that its a losing battle to reject Hitler..

That’s indicative of why I don’t trust Horus, besides his forays into bizarre speculation, he treats Hitler as being only problematic as a result of Jewish spin, not that there’s an underlying problem…same position of course, held by Kyle Cunt.

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:25 | #

Daniel,

It is not possible for European populations to live with African populations.  The African sociobiology is too challenging.  That’s what “white flight” is all about.  Would not, then, a successful attack on white neighbourhoods inevitably bring to the fore the white American homeland as the surviving option, and also radicalise whites against the very government and nation from which they would have to secede?

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:01 | #

Let’s hope so…and there is a widely accepted logic of meaning and action among WN here:

The thinking behind the “worse is better” (for now) suggestion.

I would add the caveat that the casualties will be too significant (interesting philosophical/theoretical questions arise there) to merely accept “worse is better” to do the work…

Nevertheless, things probably do have to get so bad, as the suggestion goes, for the sheeple to awake..

But they will awake if events are stark enough whereas by boiling the frog slowly, genocide by assimilation may be completed without a significant challenge…

The danger in either case is demoralization of White men, in particular…

such that those remaining will be too dispirited to fight or flee to an organized defense; then they will either die-off or also intermarry - with meztizos, mulattoes (who, like Jews, have a kind of crypsis) or orientals.

Posted by Mick Lately on Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:53 | #

If this “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing” is carried out and “Immgration Reform” is carried out and further attempts to disarm law-abiding whites through “gun control” are made then perhaps even the most obtuse, in-denial white man will wake up.

Posted by voznich on Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:47 | #

This post from Derbyshire can never be posted too often. Derb is a bit of a suck-up (who are the “black geniuses” anyway? I really don’t know), who married an Asian, but this is still pretty good. Hard to believe it got him fired from neocon National Review.

The Talk: Nonblack Version

by John Derbyshire
April 05, 2012

There is much talk about “the talk.”

“Sean O’Reilly was 16 when his mother gave him the talk that most black parents give their teenage sons,” Denisa R. Superville of the Hackensack (NJ) Record tells us. Meanwhile, down in Atlanta: “Her sons were 12 and 8 when Marlyn Tillman realized it was time for her to have the talk,” Gracie Bonds Staples writes in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

Leonard Greene talks about the talk in the New York Post. Someone bylined as KJ Dell’Antonia talks about the talk in The New York Times. Darryl Owens talks about the talk in the Orlando Sentinel.
Yes, talk about the talk is all over.

There is a talk that nonblack Americans have with their kids, too. My own kids, now 19 and 16, have had it in bits and pieces as subtopics have arisen. If I were to assemble it into a single talk, it would look something like the following.

(1) Among your fellow citizens are forty million who identify as black, and whom I shall refer to as black. The cumbersome (and MLK- noncompliant) term “African-American” seems to be in decline, thank goodness. “Colored” and “Negro” are archaisms. What you must call “the ‘N’ word” is used freely among blacks but is taboo to nonblacks.

(2) American blacks are descended from West African populations, with some white and aboriginal-American admixture. The overall average of non-African admixture is 20-25 percent. The admixture distribution is nonlinear, though: “It seems that around 10 percent of the African American population is more than half European in ancestry.”

(3) Your own ancestry is mixed north-European and northeast- Asian, but blacks will take you to be white.

(4) The default principle in everyday personal encounters is, that as a fellow citizen, with the same rights and obligations as yourself, any individual black is entitled to the same courtesies you would extend to a nonblack citizen. That is basic good manners and good citizenship. In some unusual circumstances, however—e.g., paragraph (10h) below—this default principle should be overridden by considerations of personal safety.

(5) As with any population of such a size, there is great variation among blacks in every human trait (except, obviously, the trait of identifying oneself as black). They come fat, thin, tall, short, dumb, smart, introverted, extroverted, honest, crooked, athletic, sedentary, fastidious, sloppy, amiable, and obnoxious. There are black geniuses and black morons. There are black saints and black psychopaths. In a population of forty million, you will find almost any human type. Only at the far, far extremes of certain traits are there absences. There are, for example, no black Fields Medal winners. While this is civilizationally consequential, it will not likely ever be important to you personally. Most people live and die without ever meeting (or wishing to meet) a Fields Medal winner.

(6) As you go through life, however, you will experience an ever larger number of encounters with black Americans. Assuming your encounters are random—for example, not restricted only to black convicted murderers or to black investment bankers—the Law of Large Numbers will inevitably kick in. You will observe that the means—the averages—of many traits are very different for black and white Americans, as has been confirmed by methodical inquiries in the human sciences.

(7) Of most importance to your personal safety are the very different means for antisocial behavior, which you will see reflected in, for instance, school disciplinary measures, political corruption, and criminal convictions.

(8) These differences are magnified by the hostility many blacks feel toward whites. Thus, while black-on-black behavior is more antisocial in the average than is white-on-white behavior, average black-on-white behavior is a degree more antisocial yet.

(9) A small cohort of blacks—in my experience, around five percent —is ferociously hostile to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us. A much larger cohort of blacks—around half—will go along passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. They will do this out of racial solidarity, the natural willingness of most human beings to be led, and a vague feeling that whites have it coming.

(10) Thus, while always attentive to the particular qualities of individuals, on the many occasions where you have nothing to guide you but knowledge of those mean differences, use statistical common sense:

(10a) Avoid concentrations of blacks not all known to you personally.

(10b) Stay out of heavily black neighborhoods.

(10c) If planning a trip to a beach or amusement park at some date, find out whether it is likely to be swamped with blacks on that date (neglect of that one got me the closest I have ever gotten to death by gunshot).

(10d) Do not attend events likely to draw a lot of blacks.

(10e) If you are at some public event at which the number of blacks suddenly swells, leave as quickly as possible.

(10f) Do not settle in a district or municipality run by black politicians.

(10g) Before voting for a black politician, scrutinize his/her character much more
carefully than you would a white.

(10h) Do not act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway.

(10i) If accosted by a strange black in the street, smile and say something polite but keep moving.

(11) The mean intelligence of blacks is much lower than for whites. The least intelligent ten percent of whites have IQs below 81; forty percent of blacks have IQs that low. Only one black in six is more intelligent than the average white; five whites out of six are more intelligent than the average black. These differences show in every test of general cognitive ability that anyone, of any race or nationality, has yet been able to devise. They are reflected in countless everyday situations. “Life is an IQ test.”

(12) There is a magnifying effect here, too, caused by affirmative action. In a pure meritocracy there would be very low proportions of blacks in cognitively demanding jobs. Because of affirmative action, the proportions are higher. In government work, they are very high. Thus, in those encounters with strangers that involve cognitive engagement, ceteris paribus the black stranger will be less intelligent than the white. In such encounters, therefore—for example, at a government office—you will, on average, be dealt with more competently by a white than by a black. If that hostility-based magnifying effect (paragraph 8) is also in play, you will be dealt with more politely, too. “The DMV lady“ is a statistical truth, not a myth.

(13) In that pool of forty million, there are nonetheless many intelligent and well-socialized blacks. (I’ll use IWSB as an ad hoc abbreviation.) You should consciously seek opportunities to make friends with IWSBs. In addition to the ordinary pleasures of friendship, you will gain an amulet against potentially career-destroying accusations of prejudice.

(14) Be aware, however, that there is an issue of supply and demand here. Demand comes from organizations and businesses keen to display racial propriety by employing IWSBs, especially in positions at the interface with the general public—corporate sales reps, TV news presenters, press officers for government agencies, etc.—with corresponding depletion in less visible positions. There is also strong private demand from middle- and upper-class whites for personal bonds with IWSBs, for reasons given in the previous paragraph and also (next paragraph) as status markers.

(15) Unfortunately the demand is greater than the supply, so IWSBs are something of a luxury good, like antique furniture or corporate jets: boasted of by upper-class whites and wealthy organizations, coveted by the less prosperous. To be an IWSB in present-day US society is a height of felicity rarely before attained by any group of human beings in history. Try to curb your envy: it will be taken as prejudice (see paragraph 13).

You don’t have to follow my version of the talk point for point; but if you are white or Asian and have kids, you owe it to them to give them some version of the talk. It will save them a lot of time and trouble spent figuring things out for themselves. It may save their lives.

Sad days, but almost all of this seems true.

Posted by Obamnesty on Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:28 | #

Can We Stop Pretending Yet?

The Obama Amnesty

Gregory Hood

http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/11/can-we-stop-pretending-yet/

Can we stop pretending yet? Can we please just stop with this sick farce of Constitutions, and Dreams, and Exceptionalisms and all the rest of it?

It’s over. It’s done. The Experiment failed.

At this point, what is the point of all this?

Barack Obama just abolished immigration law by granting amnesty to an estimated five million illegal immigrants. All of the children of these illegal immigrants will be citizens. He did this unilaterally and illegally. We know it was illegal because he told us so on multiple occasions over the last few years.

If the rule of law, the principle of sovereignty, and even the distinction between foreigner and citizen is to be abolished, why do we have this government to begin with? It seems incredible that this massive apparatus commanding vast intelligence agencies, terrifying military and paramilitary forces, and nightmarish weapons capable of destroying the world ten times over is simply giving up…

....

Yet there’s something deeper underneath all this. Contra the predictions of imminent collapse, the federal government is now reporting record tax revenues and the our expanding federal deficit means little as long as the dollar is secure as the world’s reserve currency. Some believe that other powers are rising to counter American influence, particularly Russia. Yet the entire Russian stock market is worth less than Apple (as are Singapore and Italy.) And the United States has overtaken Saudi Arabia and is now the biggest oil producer in the world. Put simply, the pax Americana continues and Bismarck is proven correct – “There is a special providence for drunkards, fools, and the United States of America.”

The terrible truth is that the decision to essentially hand over the country to a foreign population is being done from a position of strength. The ruling powers of the country have made the conscious decision that they can tighten their control by electing a new people. The new Third World “American” population will be willing to accept lower living standards and the transfer or resources from labor to capital.

Read full article at Counter Currents
http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/11/can-we-stop-pretending-yet/

Posted by ImmigrationFiat on Sat, 22 Nov 2014 05:23 | #

Fiat executive power plus forced integration =

“Everything You Need To Know About Obama’s Executive Amnesty”

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/conncarroll/2014/11/21/everything-you-need-to-know-about-obamas-executive-amnesty-n1922199

In a primetime address on November 20, President Obama made his sales pitch to the American people for a series of immigration executive actions he will sign on November 21 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Here is what you need to know:

What actions is Obama taking specifically?

The key to Obama’s new immigration policy is the creation of one new amnesty program and the expansion of another.

Specifically, Obama’s new amnesty program will give illegal immigrants who have been in the United States for at least five years, and who are parents of U.S. citizens or legal residents, a three year work permit. This permit will also allow them to obtain a Social Security number and get a driver’s license. Pew estimates that 3.5 million current illegal immigrants will qualify for this program.

Obama is also expanding the existing Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals amnesty program. Previously only those illegal immigrants who were born before 1981 and entered the U.S. as a minor before 2007 were eligible for benefits. Now all illegal immigrants who entered the U.S. as a minor before 2010 will be eligible for amnesty. Like the parents above, DACA recipients will also get work permits, Social Security numbers, and driver’s licenses. Pew estimates that 235,00 illegal immigrants will gain eligibility for benefits through this program expansion.

Is this legal?

Obama didn’t think so. As recently as this spring, and on more than 20 other occasions, Obama said he could not rewrite immigration law by executive action.

Specifically, this March Obama told Univision, “But what I’ve said in the past remains true, which is until Congress passes a new law, then I am constrained in terms of what I am able to do. ... t at a certain point the reason that these deportations are taking place is, Congress said, ‘you have to enforce these laws.’ They fund the hiring of officials at the department that’s charged with enforcing. And I cannot ignore those laws any more than I could ignore, you know, any of the other laws that are on the books.

More damning, in 2011, Obama told the National Council of La Raza, “Believe me, the idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. I promise you. Not just on immigration reform. But that’s not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written.”

How is Obama justifying this amnesty?

The Office of Legal Counsel memo released before Obama’s speech cites Obama’s Article II Section 3 constitutional duty to “take care that the Laws be faithfully executed” as the source of his power to grant this amnesty.

The memo reasons that since there are 11.3 million illegal immigrants in the country today, and DHS only has the resources to remove 400,000 illegal immigrants every year, Obama must choose which immigrants to deport and which to ignore. This “prosecutorial discretion” power, the memo claims, allows Obama to choose which illegal immigrants get work permits, which illegal immigrants will continue to be ignored, and which illegal immigrants will be deported.

But Congress can afford…

Posted by Ferguson Burns on Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:38 | #

Bob in DC says:

Revealed here by this whining rant, Dutchsinse, and those like him, are beginning to get their own ‘just deserts’ for past weak-kneed acceptance of liberal kikejew equalitarian multi-culturalism. Others fought it for decades, too often to be confronted by such assholes as this, who now too late ‘see the light’.

Diversity within the Race – NOT outside of it !

11/25/2014 — Saint Louis Missouri spirals out of control — Ferguson BURNS

by Michael Janitch

After a night of reporting on HUNDREDS of shooting incidents, showing dozens of businesses burned to the ground, hearing about rioting looters taking over multiple sections of the city, and even groups of protesters coming down to my neighborhood on the South side of St. Louis (to try to start problems)......

Now, one graphic sums it all up….

ferguson november 24 2014

Ferguson has been destroyed.  Surrounding cities severely damaged, and people have now been shot (by other people not police).

NO shots fired by police.

On the other hand, over 150 gun shots made at police, and person on person.  Multiple home burglaries, store robberies, and assaults done looters/rioters/protesters.  One reporter hit in the head with a brick, another with a large rock.  Several police cars destroyed.

The National Guard has now been deployed in Ferguson, and is patrolling randomly around the area, including areas far from the actual unrest.

For the record, I am an outspoken critic of the “police state”, and 100% opposed to the New World Order.  I’m a lifelong equality supporter, fighting for rights of minorities for years.  I’ve literally FOUGHT nazi skinheads (no joke).

I’m saddened to report that I’m more fearful of my fellow citizens destroying my life, and property than I am of the NWO doing so… at least at this point it appears the people are more lawless, and care LESS about my rights than the NWO.

It’s a sad day when “dutchsinse” can call his fellow citizens fascist [SIC] lawless tyrants—you’d think I’d be worried about police state kicking in my door with the things I cover, but I’m looking out my window for groups of zombie citizens.

Zombies using Michael Brown as an excuse to steal things, and destroy property that has nothing to do with Brown, or “justice”.

See my facebook page for a full recap of events on a play by play, every 5-10 minutes throughout last nights rioting.

http://dutchsinse.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/5777F3A2C31148862919682166784_312f7450a34.0.1.1585351932002343911.mp4

Posted by SouthernNationalism on Fri, 19 Dec 2014 06:25 | #

Dr. Michael Hill on Southern Nationalism and its coordination

http://www.radixjournal.com/vanguard-radio/2014/12/18/the-south-a-nation