Posted by Joel Godfrey on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:34 | #

Listen to the activist girl very clearly and then ask yourself one thing.  Could I ever date someone that had reasoning like that?  And then ask yourself one other thing.  If white men rule the world and you can’t pin point where or what groups control what and you can’t clearly see racial paterns yet you do know that you yourself come from a white man and woman that supposedly fit a world wide pattern of priviledge then why is it the white man that is the evil one and not yourself.  And if the white man controls things yet has children that benefit from it aren’t the little girls and little boys somehow guilty of something as well?
I hate even babbling like this, because to me it is truly all nonsense, however we can now see why it is so hard for many men to date good looking women.  Many seem obsessed with getting rid of white male power and inherent prviledge, which means that white men will not be seen as equals to this type of a woman.  Also, It means that these types of women tend to not realize that when they go out with their guyfriends and many get their food paid for and basically everything at a discount rate because of their man in their life they are living by the code of priviledge, White Woman Priviledge.
I’ve tried to tell young girls like this for years that I’d gladly give up my right to white male priviledge if Affirmative Action ends, and I’d gladly give up my white male priviledge when it comes to dating white girls, being immune to criminal punishment and getting preferential treatment by big business and the government for jobs.  I’d rather have the black or white women priviledge in those fields. 
Well, that’s all I really wanted to say.  Men like myself, college educated yet racially aware and proud never could get on well with this type.  No wonder so many people who lie all of the time end up with all of the power and ladies.  By the way, why wasn’t she trying to take the speaker away from that white man on her side and show her right to power and force his abdication of it, was he not white and in a position of power at that time.

http://www.rasmusshirepress.com

Posted by Mr. Something At on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:49 | #

I don’t believe in humor and laughter.

I’ve never personally met a person who’s brain programming caused him to lie on the floor and sway left to right as a kinetic manifestation of the laughter brain program.  I’ve seen actors on TV act out this behavior though.

Posted by VanSpeyk on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:13 | #

Did the Asian woman in the first clip really refer to the GOP as “our party”? What did she meant by that, that the Republican party is the party of FOX? If that’s the case then they have shed any pretense of objectivity (what little they had left).

Posted by Jean Depression on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:09 | #

Hmmm….“fever swamp” - there you go.  Ad hominem masquerading as debate.  If Paul is wrong, bring out the evidence rather than smirking behind the cover of “conventional wisdom” (hear that, “Realist?”).

On the other hand, Paul should be willing to put forth _his_ evidence and beliefs on this issue as well. 

If not on FOX then on some other, more objective forum.

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:43 | #

The plan for “debate” is basically to put Ron Paul into a room with some FOXY news concubines who then proceed to act like pubescent brats toward him while he is restrained from spanking them.  Its got nothing to do with exposing the merits of different views and everything to do with mammalian politics.

Posted by Steven on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:07 | #

I think Michelle Malkin is lying when she says Ron Paul was invited to be a guest, but declined.  A common tactic by empty headed neo clones that have to stick to their scripted talking points.  Anyone who watches Fox News should be banned from voting

Posted by Friedrich Braun on Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:36 | #

I saw “Dumb and Dumber” last weekend. That dark, Asian airhead had a sexy dress on, though.