|
|
|
My Letter to Congressman-Elect Latham Congressman, First of all: Congratulations! I am proud to have designed and help construct your 4’ by 8’ sign at the highest traffic intersection of Shenandoah, IA. Your election, with the presence of Des Moines in our district, made our Tuesday night victory party here in Shenandoah a true celebration. I grew up in Iowa and lived for 18 years in California starting during the Reagan Administration. Indeed, I lived on the border of Mexico, in Imperial Beach, CA, during Reagan’s 1986 amnesty. Over the next 15 years I watched California change until I could no longer tolerate living there. I first moved north to Washington State where I was on the State platform committee for the GOP, but finally saw the fruits of the 1986 amnesty fall there as well. That’s when I moved back to Iowa. Immigration, both legal as well as illegal, is killing this country. I can even see incipient signs of it here in southwest Iowa. If the House doesn’t stop this destruction of America during this term, when the Republican’s have control of the purse strings—possibly for the last time—I’ll have no country. My father, who joined the nascent Air Force prior to Pearl Harbor because of Lindbergh’s warnings of Germany’s air power—before he died in 2008—expressed a similar feeling, having retired to southern Texas. We talked about how privileged he was to be able to truly fight for his country and how deprived I had been: to watch my country be conquered without even being given a chance to fight for it. Sincerely, James Bowery Comments:2
Posted by Bill on Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:59 | # Robert Stark interviews Kevin MacDonald at CC. Immigration is non negotiable, off the table, it’s the elite’s sacred cow. Nothing, but nothing will stand in the way of making America into a white minority nation. I’m half way through (20.40) no mention of a new world order though. It’ll be interesting if he tells us why a white minority America is so vital to elite interest. 3
Posted by Hail on Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:43 | # Snapshot of California’s pathetic decline: “From the mid-1980s to 2005, California’s population grew by 10 million, while Medicaid recipients soared by seven million; tax filers paying income taxes rose by just 150,000; and the prison population swelled by 115,000. … With 12% of America’s population, California has one third of the nation’s welfare recipients.” [Wall Street Journal] 4
Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:32 | # Bill, the main problem isn’t making America into a white minority nation—it is the vengeful attitude with which Jews have inculcated the non-whites. The main thing keeping the white population from living in stark terror of something like Zimbabwe/South African butcherings and sexual torture is that Jews have succeeded in inculcating whites with the idea that they deserve it. At least the quasi-white-minority elites of Latin America have managed to avoid the Wrath of the Jew in this regard. 5
Posted by Tom on Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:02 | #
“Islamization of Europe a good thing” “Rabbi Baruch Efrati believes Jews should ‘rejoice at the fact that Europe is paying for what it did to us for hundreds of years by losing its identity.’ He praises Islam for promoting modesty, respect for God” http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4299673,00.html
6
Posted by Sal on Mon, 12 Nov 2012 03:06 | #
Good luck, bubbe. 7
Posted by torgrim on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:34 | # “The jew cries out in pain, as he hits you”. What a classic example of an authoritarian complex. After reading this self important, cleric, from now on if I see anything starting with Rabbi, this or that, I will just skip the rant. What a load! 8
Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:36 | # White Zion beckons, people ... The problem isn’t Jews or minorities - it’s us! To repeat: whites are genetically maladapted to today’s intersectional environment of rampant population migrations and anti-racist (anti-)ethics. Why are whites so easily brainwashed by multiculturalism? Why don’t they care about what types of societies their children will inherit? I wish I had answers. I only know what I’ve known for decades: whites are genetically defective (as well as recessive). How else to explain the same anti-racist memetic virus whipsawing across the whole white world, despite strikingly different national histories and circumstances? “White guilt” to a sane man is barely comprehensible in the US or UK or France. But Denmark? Poland? Italy? I suspect that antiracism would predominate among whites even if Hitler had never lived, or the Old South had never owned slaves. It is an expression of the innate modal white ethical sense. We WNs are a special breed. I think we are larger than our “official” number, but not remotely a white majority, except perhaps in certain Eastern European places which are simply ‘behind’ the West in cultural (d)evolution. It is predetermined that we will go extinct unless we secure sovereign territory for whites to live as white communities. We can only do this by ingathering of (neuro)ideologically similar persons into a distinct territory. Otherwise, white preservationists will never be a majority anywhere - thus guaranteeing our gradual extinction. There is no answer except White Zion.
9
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20 | #
This is true but Jews ARE a problem. More specifically those Jews (not all Jews) that write, or help co-write, the rules of the “anti-racist” peer pressure game. Peer pressure for whites to conform is SO strong that whites are willing to commit ethnic suicide in order not to be ridiculed, shunned or excluded from the group. I was listening to KMac and he was saying (paraphrasing) whites must get over their fear of being called a racist. I don’t think whites are afraid of being called racist; what whites really fear is being excluded from the group. Being labeled a racist in the PC “anti-racist” environment we live in is a sure way of being excluded from the group. That’s what whites fear. That’s why whites feign going along with “anti-racism”. I’ll go even farther out on a limb and state: Most whites in the peer group, don’t buy into the “anti-racist” BS. It’s not that people are SOOOOO turned off by those that dissent from “anti-racist” mandates, what it is is most people really like the sport of seeing the other guy mocked and persecuted. Unfortunately whites take joy in seeing the other guy swinging in the wind. “Anti-racism” provides a great opportunity to participate in that particular sport. More prominent cases of such are Don Imus, Fuzzy Zeller, Jimmy the Greek. Even the powerful Donald Trump almost fell victim to this sport. Remember the BO birth certificate controversy in the spring of 2011? And how all those on the Left where singing the refrain: TRUMP IS A RACIST!!! They even called Alan West and Herman Cain “white-supremacists” because the dared to dissent against the cult of victimization. But I digress….. I know this is repetitious and boring, but the main task of white preservationists is to genuinely make our cause more attractive (ESPECIALLY TO WHITE FEMALES!!!) than their “anti-racist” cause (and necessarily have some sort of real coolness wove into it). First we must provide a peer group strong enough to where people that are ANTI “anti-racist” can associate feel safe in doing so. Herein lies the rub: Most that occupy the WN ranks are atheists, anti-Semites, anti-Christians, anti-capitalists, neo=Nazis. This is hardly a place where 99% of young people will want to invest their future in. If WN keeps going in the direction it’s going, the only thing it will accomplish is to continue to provide guys like Leonard Zeskind with plenty of material to write about, and to keep the coffers of the SPLC overflowing thus keeping the hidious Heidi Beirich employed. 10
Posted by daniels on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:17 | # Thorn, I had hope that you meant it when you said that you were moving on. Haller, its all our fault? You two seem to be working in tandem. I do not trust where either of you are coming from. You are generating a lot of informational traffic, noise and diverting people from the ideas of many thoughtful White advocates. 11
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:37 | # ROFLMFAO! Now this guy has a great sense of humor. He puts it all in its proper perspective: 12
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:41 | #
PS, Don’t worry about your email being revealed, danny boy. Ain’t no one interested in a dumb ass like you. 13
Posted by daniels. on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:41 | # Posted by Thorn on November 13, 2012, 11:37 AM | # ROFLMFAO! Now this guy has a great sense of humor. He puts it all in its proper perspective:
14
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:54 | # Moving back towards the entry’s topic. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Well done Velociman.
15
Posted by James Bowery on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:52 | # A simple solution to the generational warfare over “entitlements”, which is about as “generational” as is the use of the word “youths” or “teens” by the media: Terminate all programs related to Social Security and lump-sum refund all of the money paid into Social Security, plus interest at Treasury rates of similar term, that has not yet been paid out. That idea should send Thorn and Velociman into conniption fits. 16
Posted by daniels. on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:58 | # Posted by Thorn on November 13, 2012, 11:41 AM | # Thorn, I had hope that you meant it when you said that you were moving on.
PS, Don’t worry about your email being revealed, danny boy. Ain’t no one interested in a dumb ass like you.
I actually believe that in your case, it is both. But you do provide a good illustration of the problem with one quarter Jews, that they are predictably still too Jewish. This raises a significant question as to future policy with regard to quarter Jews. At this point, we might safely hypothesize that are not trustworthy among White advocates. Where they might go and who they might identify with, I am not sure, but sincere Whites ought to beware.
17
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:03 | #
Not in the least bit James. That idea has been kicked around for quite some time now. In fact ten years ago, while in my mid forties, I was saying: CASH ME OUT! It was a common belief that SS probably wouldn’t be around when people my age, or younger, reached the age of eligibility. Fast forward ten years and i think I’d still take the deal. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush….. By the time I’m 66, SS, if not already bankrupt, will no doubt be means tested. In that case I will be ineligible to collect it. I’ll be in too high of an income bracket. But that’s the best case scenario. What I mean by that is I’m not sure SS will be around for anyone. Hell, I doubt the USA will be intact in ten years! Surely the USD will be, via QE to infinity, be diluted down to the value of toilet paper . Furthermore, look at the debt clock. The US 16.3 trillion dollar public debt is chump change compared to the 123 trillion in unfunded mandates. The GDP vs what the government promises in programs don’t equate. Not even close. As Pat Buchanan said: A day of reckoning is coming. However, the last thing I want to see is SS done away with; that is unless an alternative safety net is in place for low income seniors. PS, As far a Velociman goes, I believe he’s an attorney and close to my age. Given that, my guess is he’d take the deal too.
18
Posted by Thorn on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:20 | # correction, should be: U.S. national debt and unfunded liabilities 19
Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:45 | # Velociman clearly believes that a person who has been forced to pay huge amounts of money over decades deserves less than nothing—indeed is “inhuman” for expecting anything in return for that money. One may be forgiven for thinking that you, extensively quoting Velociman without critical comment, agree. 20
Posted by Leon Haller on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:33 | #
You haven’t pondered my comment very closely. I’m not “working” or “in tandem” with anybody - though Thorn appears to be a normal Middle American, race realistic conservative like me. Whites could crush multiculturalism if they all went WN. Why don’t they? If you say “Jewish brainwashing”, then that means we’re REALLY pathetic. The truth is that there are many smart whites who are not in the least brainwashed by Jews, but who choose race liberalism of their own accord, because it seems right to them. My interest is in why that is (what evolutionary or philosophical developments explain this about us), and even more, in how it impacts our struggle. Facts must be faced. Thorn @ 9 I agree with you completely. Nothing to add. WNs almost seek to shrink their group, rather than expand in ways to encompass the largest number of our people around the most effective and popular elements of the race-preservationist agenda (start with deporting illegals, and fighting special privileges for nonwhites). 21
Posted by daniels. on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:32 | # The truth is that there are many smart whites who are not in the least brainwashed by Jews, but who choose race liberalism of their own accord, because it seems right to them. My interest is in why that is (what evolutionary or philosophical developments explain this about us), and even more, in how it impacts our struggle I have explained this, Leon. It basically has to do with a naiive or disingenuous quest for the innocence of objectivity. The pursuit of objectivity is not necessarily pathetic in its original motive - it is rather noble. However, this quest has long since reached the point where it turns back upon itself - philosophically, sociologically and otherwise.
22
Posted by Fr. John+ on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:23 | # James B- Neighbor! I lived in San Diego in the 1980’s, and watched the same ‘Californication’ happen. I, too, remember IB, and spent many a fine day in Coronado, and biking the Silver Strand. Have you note kept track of the secession petitions going on over here, specifically over at Occidental Dissent? I would think MR would be letting everyone know of the Heartland’s saying “NYET” to the Obamanation. http://www.occidentaldissent.com Next, a comment for Leon: “Although I consider myself a Christian conservative, at least in the abstract, the whole Christianist agenda must be abandoned, as surely as the neocon globalist one. I oppose abortion “rights” because my Catholic Church tells me to do so - ” Leon Leon, you are confusing a cult with Christianity. Rome has EVER been only interested in ROME, not Christianity, since at least 1100. She is (as the Reformers noted of her) ‘... no TRUE church.” Her adoptin of a FALSE model of ‘caesaro-papalism’ after she schismated herself in AD1054 (via the addition of the ‘filioque’ in the Creed) led to two ‘innovations’ that directly affect your concerns, as expressed in your comment. Rome adopted two CONTRARY ideas to Christianity’s mission, and focus, over a thousand years ago. And most Westerners don’t realize that fact. The Eastern Orthodox do, and have manifestly been very vocal, ever since! What are these heresies? First, by making one member of the Holy Trinity (the H.S.) a ‘created thing’ rather than God (for that’s what the filioque does, ‘philosophically speaking,’ [ godhistorydialectic.wordpress.com ] it left a ‘hole’ in the Trinity, that the Papal Office was more than glad to fill. Thus, a mere man came to be thought of as GOD on Earth. Sorry, big heresy there. Then, the Pope promulgated two subsquent heresies. One (since he was ‘as the voice of God’) was “Universal jurisdiction.” Instead of Christendom being concentrated/located in the bosom of the Roman Empire (i.e., Europe) the pope, full of himself, claimed that the WHOLE WORLD was ‘his own.’ Following on that (and, with the discovery of the “New World”) His Popiness also proclaimed something that NEVER was in the minds of the first 10 centuries of Christendom- that ALL RACES, ALL PEOPLES, ALL HOMINIDS, were to be ‘converted’ - the next big heresy. For the “Faith” that Christ said He was come to proclaim, HE also said He was only to deliver to ONE people- the “Lost Sheep of the HOUSE [Gr. “oikos” race, ethnic family, in-group] of ISRAEL.” i.e., WHITE MEN. (ADAM- you know, the first ‘man’ in Genesis, actually means, ‘fair, ruddy, able to [visibly] blush’ in the Hebrew.) And the ‘world’ of the “Great Commission” was the World that the Apostles knew- i.e., the World of EUROPE, and none other. Even the Holy Spirit turned the Apostles away from Asia, and made them focus on Europe. THAT’s what Acts 16:6 means. THey were FORBIDDEN to go to the non-Whites outside of EUROPE! So, it is NOT Christianity that should be abandoned, but the FALSE VISION of a corrupt and graceless ROME (who, sadly, passed on this fallacious vision to her Protestant daughters). As Hilaire Belloc (Himself a convert to Rome, amazingly enough had this much inner insight to point out that “EUROPE is the FAITH; the FAITH, EUROPE.” Christianity IS the WHITE MAN’s Religion, and his alone. http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/of-what-race-are-abraham’s-seed-gal-329/ 23
Posted by daniels. on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:38 | # . One of the worst things that I have noticed about the Orthodox Church is that they allow for extreme forms of bigotry against other European peoples; of course, without accountability because it is based on nonsense. They are not the only Christian denomination that does this, of course. Many sects, such as Jehohva’s Witnesses and other fundamentalists, have been influenced by Scottish theologian Alexander Hislop’s stories (Babylon the Great has Fallen or Papal Worship proved to be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife) that the church in Rome was an expression of the evil Babylonian Mystery Religion; which promoted false idolatry, pagan practices, such as changing the winter solstice into a celebration of Jesus’ birthday and so on. It is an intriguing story * but there is nothing more dubious if not evil than the idea that other versions of Christianity are evil while there is one that is true. All are re-hashed paganism. One might have hoped rather, that Hislop, for example, could have more forthrightly sought to protect his Scottish peoples (from southern Europeans or whatever his hidden ethnocentric concern) rather than spinning a fascinating web about Rome being the manifestation of evil per-se. Like all of Christianity, this leaves Europeans vulnerable to the Tom foolery of Jewish interests - intriguing narratives of evil infiltration via Rome plays perfectly into divide and conquer strategies. But coming to the Christian texts more basically, Rome was demonized in cryptic terms in the Book of Revelation because it was the enemy of Jews (a second Babylon, a second great captor for them), and they could not speak effectively in open terms; its symbolic terms are a double edged sword in being elusive to antagonists to the group but highly manipulable and subject to abuse. Orthodox Christianity might have a more subtle way of playing the Ouija board of Christian texts and pseudo-symbolism on behalf of particular European nationalisms (against other Europeans nationalisms), but it has the same Jewish tooled nonsense texts at is basis.
These intriguing stories of pure and evil versions of Christianity are behind the inspiration for much of the problematic Christian Zionism in America - The World Wide Church of God, for example, uses these narratives, “The Plain Truth Behind Christmas”, “The Book of Revelation Revealed at Last” etc….while Armstrong would go on about how America would be blessed only so long as it stood behind Israel - where jeeeeesusss will return, shining like the sun!!! Even World Chess champion, Bobby Fischer, 171 i.q. and all, fell for this stuff at least for a while - how much more vulnerable a troubled and alienated ordinary American would be. 24
Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:46 | # Fr. John, The secession petitions are worthy of a main post here at MR, however we must not confuse these petitions for anything more than a cry of impotence in the face of Leviathan’s relentless genocide of founding stock Americans (a genocide celebrated by some ostensible “white nationalists” here at MR who see white Americans as a disease to be stamped out). What is worthy of note is that this cry of impotence is achieving resonance in the echo chamber of New Media, and that therefore the structure of this impotence, being central to the structure of that genocide, is entering “the conversation”. 25
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:02 | #
If I agreed with your opinion, James, then we would both be wrong. What Velociman is saying is its “inhumanly” selfish to run up a 16.3 trillion debt and 123 trillion in unfunded liabilities—and to continue this unsustainable spending spree unabated—then dumping this debt on the shoulders of our children, grand-children…... I, and unfortunatly only 49% of Americanos, agree with him. ++++++++++++++++++
Agreed. To blame Jews for all our problems is comparable to the false doctrine blacks depend on: All Blacks’ problems/failure can be traced directly to white-racism. 26
Posted by daniels. on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:22 | # The truth is that there are many smart whites who are not in the least brainwashed by Jews, but who choose race liberalism of their own accord, because it seems right to them.—LH Agreed. To blame Jews for all our problems is comparable to the false doctrine blacks depend on: All Blacks’ problems/failure can be traced directly to white-racism. This straw man argument has been addressed already, in post 21 and many others. 27
Posted by Graham_Lister on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:14 | # In his ‘Notes Towards a Definition of Culture’, TS Eliot remarked that there are moments when the only choice is between heresy and non-belief, when the only way to keep the best of religion alive is to perform a sectarian split from its corpse. Something like this is needed to break out of the debilitating crisis of Western societies; only our religion is an unconstrainted liberal theory – or rather hyper-liberalism in the age of super-modernity. A great art of politics is to insist on a particular demand that, while thoroughly realist, feasible and legitimate, disturbs the core of the hegemonic ideology. At the core of America’s ideological edifice is individual liberty and ‘freedom of choice’ - and these concepts now profoundly shape the entire West - obviously the degree of their influence does vary but no-one has been ‘immune’ to them. Liberal theory enjoys ‘full spectrum dominance’. One lesson to be learned about that idea of freedom of choice is that only functions if a complex network of legal, educational, ethical, economic and other conditions is present as the invisible background to the exercise of our freedom. This is why, as a counter to the ideology of choice, countries like Denmark should be held up as better models: although all the main agents respect a basic social agreement and large social projects are enacted in a spirit of solidarity, social productivity and dynamism are at extraordinary levels, contradicting the common wisdom (of the typical US talking heads) that such a society should be stagnating horribly. In Europe, the ground floor of a building is counted as zero, so the floor above it is the first floor, while in the USA, the first floor is on street level. This trivial difference indicates a profound ideological gap: Europeans are aware that, before counting starts – before decisions or choices are made – there has to be a ground of tradition, a zero level that is always already given and, as such, cannot be counted. While the US, a land with no proper historical tradition, presumes that one can begin directly with self-legislated freedom – the past is erased. What the USA has to learn to take into account is the collective foundation that allows for the individual’s “freedom to choose”. Liberalism cannot sustainably be that foundation – that “individual freedom” must always be placed in a wider historical and collective context. In situations of crisis, a division is urgently needed between those who want to drag on within old parameters and those who are aware of necessary change. Such a division, not opportunistic compromises, is the only path to true unity. When Margaret Thatcher was asked about her greatest achievement, she promptly answered: “New Labour.” And she was right: her triumph was that even her political enemies adopted her basic economic policies. True victory over your enemy occurs when they start to use your language, so that your ideas form the foundation of the entire field. Today, when the neo-liberal hegemony is clearly falling apart, the only solution is to repeat Thatcher’s gesture but for a quite different ideological purpose. Yurodivy is the Russian Orthodox version of the holy fool who feigns insanity so he can deliver a message so dangerous for those in power that, if stated directly, it would cause a brutal reaction. Do Donald Trump’s post-election tweets not sound precisely like a holy fool’s ramblings? “Let’s fight like hell and stop this great and disgusting injustice! This election is a total sham and a travesty. We are not a democracy! We can’t let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. We should have a revolution in this country!” Although Trump is in no way a radical leftist, it is easy to discern in his tweets the doubt about ‘bourgeois formal democracy’ usually attributed to the radical left: superficial freedoms mask the power of elites that enforce their will through media control and manipulations. There is a grain of truth in this – our democracy effectively has to be reinvented. Every opening should be exploited to bring us closer to this goal, even if for now it is only tiny cracks through which some light shines. 28
Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:32 | # Thorn writes: “I, and unfortunatly only 49% of Americanos, agree with him.” What percentage of Americans over the age of 50 would agree to terminate all programs associated with Social Security (hence all $123 trillion in unfunded liabilities) if they could get a refund, with interest, on the money they’ve paid into the system that they’ve not yet received? It is that number that renders you and Velociman mendacious in your portrayal of those Americans as inhuman. PS: I’ll agree there is something monsterously “inhuman” dominating the zeitgeist but your intergenerational warfare paradigm is part of that monstrousity. 29
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:11 | #
Why the fuck are you asking me?!? Like I would know the answer. Who do you think I am, Rasmussen? Get fucking real, Bowery! But to answer your question in all seriousness: It doesn’t matter what percentage would agree to it because such a proposal would NEVER make it through the legislature. There, I played your “what if?” game. Now answer me this: What if a frog had wings, would it bump its butt? BTW, Did the congressman reply to your letter? If so what did he say?
30
Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:52 | # The only sensible answer is that virtually all of these “inhuman boomers” would agree to the termination of these programs under the condition that they would be refunded their contributions. The fact that the system is set up to be hijacked by a tiny minority to pursue insane agendas like invade the world, invite the world, in hoc to the world is blamed on the “inhuman boomers” only by those who are willing participants, duped or deliberate, in the genocide against whites. 31
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:09 | # Bowery still doesn’t get the message Velociman was clearly conveying. I guess that’s what happens when an antagonistic automaton reads colorful nonclinical prose. Something is bound to get lost in the translation. 32
Posted by Thorn on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:23 | # Why does Thorn visit MR? A: There’s much gold to be found in these here hills. E.g., Dr. L’s comment @27. 33
Posted by daniels on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:09 | # . I visited the landmark Frederiks’ church, near the Royal castle; I took delight in signs which said, “speak quietly in the church.” Quite reasonably, silence was not demanded. I visited an enclave in a particular part of town called “Christiana”, which was reserved for bohemian types. This provided for the tastes of these sorts, but delimited the scope of their influence. Curious tourists might visit this bazaar atmosphere, highly emblematic of sailor’s port (Copenhagen), swashbuckling, mischievous, but mostly fun and not totally beyond reason. There were signs all over the place, “say no to hard drugs.” Perhaps not ideal, but an attempt at optimality. If one was looking for marijuana, hashish or mushrooms, they might relax and indulge among like minded folks, contained and managed safely outside of friction with the mainstream. I imagine social workers could then attend to problems that the participants might have. Upon my visit to Copenhagen, I had long been racially aware. The contrast to Amsterdam and especially to Rotterdam, was marked. While the immigrant presence and influence in these latter places were infuriating, Copenhagen was almost tolerable, even for me. The numbers of non-Europeans were far less. The homogeneity of the people far greater. I did see a pretty blond walking on the street with what was apparently her Black boyfriend and I gave them a dirty look. A second Black came along and started screaming at me that I should kill myself if I did not want to see Black and White together! Then he spit on my coat. People around were upset - with him. In contrast to similar altercations in France, Holland and elsewhere where I would have been looked upon as the one who was out of line. Despite that altercation, the experience was good. I was treated in a friendly way by the locals (when they understood that I was there just for a few days, not to stay), who gave me travel tips. I was inspired to visit Copenhagen twice more. The next time I went, one could no longer buy mushrooms in Christiana, if one were so disposed; but weed was still available for those so inclined. A Serbian taxi cab driver was happy to drive me as an American (I don’t know why); but I did not notice an increase in immigration; by my pedestrian observation it seemed fairly under control - an Arab problem there, but otherwise, pretty good. The last time I went to Copenhagen, I visited Christiana and asked about some weed. I was treated with great suspicion. I inquired in one cafe, the man told me to go to outside and meet him at a side window..he gave a hushed high-sign to a man outside; who was willing to sell me a little by ducking down a side alley - he quickly looked both ways, took my ten Euro with contempt and broke off a small piece of hashish to give to me. I went to another cafe and sat down to smoke, as I might (rarely do, haven’t in years, but..) Suddenly, I noticed everyone looking at me, with approving looks and admiration, as if I were a hero. I could not understand my celebrity. Finally, a waitress came over and asked me what my name was. I reluctantly answered and she told me, “you’re going to be the first one arrested if the police come.” ....oooooh, I put my stash in my pocket. She told me “no, no, its ok.” I thought to myself, yeah right, it’s ok. ...oh well, I made it out without being arrested and my good memories intact. I learned from people there that a “right wing government was vying for position; they wanted to shut down Christiana; developers were looking to make Christiana into an area for high end condominiums.” Of course, I thought to myself well, my friends are probably coming into government, on some important issues like immigration, anyway. The next day I went to the church, looking for the sign - I could hardly believe what it said: “Silence!” It is not my purpose to say that Copenhagen got worse for these less “optimal” or “tolerant” expressions.. While my account is highly anecdotal, I can see that there may be a great deal of merit in Denmark, a society to emulate in many respects for its facility in terms of managing its polity. I still think any percentage of non-European immigrants is a problem; and Copenhagen is all too close to Malmo, but…Graham is most likely right on this one - there is much to be said for the Danes’ competence in running a country.
34
Posted by daniels on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:21 | # ...try telling American women they should not have choice: Hence freedom of choice in association is a good rhetorical starting point, among diaspora there, for the assortocracy which we seek to begin taking hold. * Particularly given that American women are especially powerful as an influence within the disorder of modernity and America’s pervasive liberalism - just ask Bill Clinton. 35
Posted by sk on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:26 | # You smart people sure do like running around in circles, listening to yourselves. The problem, certainly IS making America, indeed EVERY white country into a white minority and then non-white country. Total genocide is the program. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. Well, no wonder, don’t tell you anything 36
Posted by Fr. John+ on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:20 | # Daniel’s Christophobia is palpable; the first sign of grave mental instability. He both lauds and condemns organized religion, and the Truth (Christianity) in the same post. Clearly, ‘of two minds,’ as St. James said. James B, to admit that the U.S. petition process is nothing more than a feeble attempt at a Leviathan, rather than a call to throw off a usurper, is to a) admit defeat before we have even begun to fight (I was there the day after Obummer won) or that b) “resistance is futile, you will be assimilated,” in any event.. Neither course is to be shouldered by ANY white man. Such advice, frankly, is that of a traitor. If all you have to offer on MR are a bunch of ‘talking heads’ that ignore the fact that the soul of Europe and the West is the Christian soul, then you are already Satan’s minions, and Daniel’s posturing is nothing more than a demon pretending to challenge the Master he already serves. Either way, you’re damned with this Weltanschauung. 37
Posted by daniels. on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:27 | # Posted by Fr. John+ on November 15, 2012, 08:20 AM | # Daniel’s Christophobia is palpable; the first sign of grave mental instability. How about, with all due respect, I disagree. He both lauds and condemns organized religion I laud a moral order for European peoples. , and the Truth (Christianity) in the same post. Christianity is not the truth. The 14 Words are - they are palpable and transcendent at once. Clearly, ‘of two minds,’ as St. James said. If it makes you feel better to say things like that, go ahead. Fr. John, you have not wasted your time so long as you have been successful in getting people to participate in a reasonable moral order, one that has served their interests well enough, while not doing unnecessary harm to others. James B, to admit that the U.S. petition process is nothing more than a feeble attempt at a Leviathan, rather than a call to throw off a usurper, is to a) admit defeat before we have even begun to fight (I was there the day after Obummer won) or that b) “resistance is futile, you will be assimilated,” in any event.. Neither course is to be shouldered by ANY white man. Such advice, frankly, is that of a traitor. Jim is not a traitor.
It is rather you who is, unbeknownst, doing the evil bidding, herding Whites to their self sacrifice on behalf of a phoney hereafter instead of the real hereafter - of their children. Sorry, Fr. John, I know that the validity of your position is weakened if I am right, but I know better than that - you are trying to stand upon obsolete, 2,000 year old texts which attempt to scare people, as you are trying to scare me, in order to keep them in line. Either way, you’re damned with this Weltanschauung. We need an intelligible moral order, fr John. Not nonsense.
38
Posted by daniels. on Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:46 | # /. Yes, liberalism as we experience it does indeed, extend from individual differences from standard European groups, to openness to non-Europeans, to inclusiveness and integration of non-Europeans among non-Europeans Of course, it should read: Yes, liberalism as we experience it does indeed, extend from individual differences from standard European groups, to openness to non-Europeans, to inclusiveness and integration of non-Europeans among Europeans , and finally to a Marxist designation of groups of non-Europeans (or those antagonistic to Europeans) as the ‘proletarian’ to be incorporated, revolutionize and overthrow the so called White/European right wing, capitalist hegemony. 39
Posted by Bill on Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:36 | # John Fonte’s important new book, Sovereignty or Submission: Will Americans Rule Themselves or be Ruled By Others is well worth your attention.
I’m late to the party on this one, can’t think where I was on this one 12 months ago. I’ve commented here before on this chap, over several years in fact. I called in at Auster’s place before turning in and he mentions Fonte and his book. Just saying in case it’s slipped you by as well. 40
Posted by Bill on Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:41 | # Oops! @ 39 forgot to include. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/277019/john-fontes-sovereignty-or-submission-stanley-kurtz 41
Posted by Bill on Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:12 | # Here’s a video of John Fonte discussing his book Sovereignty and Submission. The first 8 minutes are taken up with preliminary introduction. If you prefer to go straight in 8.30 seems a good place to start. Its duration is 1hr - 35 mins. I’m at 20 mins in and it’s looking promising. http://www.vdare.com/posts/video-of-john-fonte-discussing-sovereignty-and-submission 42
Posted by Bill on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:46 | # Maybe this is somewhat off beam but it’s all part of the mix of what is being discussed here. I’m referring to an article in today’s Telegraph by Janet Daley entitled, ‘Were Heading for Economic Dictatorship. I must confess Ms Daley is not my cup of tea, and rarely do I read her articles, usually I go straight to the comments but this time I did read what she had to say. Ms. Daley, like all journalists, is very circuitous and has a habit of omitting unwelcome facts that may spook the herd. It is common knowledge (on the Internet) the West is being redistributed to the Third World, thereby leveling the world’s economies. Whether expressed in terms of raising the Third World to meet the West, or reducing the West to meet the Third World, it can only mean a drastic reduction in living standards for the West. Some of us can already see this happening in front of our eyes, it’s the end of a way of life as we have known it. This has been ongoing for some time now as we have witnessed our industries being transferred abroad wholesale. To sum up, this is Agenda 21 of the UN in action, a programme of zero world growth. Back to the future if you like. I could go on but the point I’m trying to make is how unsuspecting and unaware are the Telegraph’s poster’s comments. The oil tanker that is the new order will never be turned round in time, our people just won’t get it. Who can blame them when the web within which we’re all enmeshed is woven with such cunning. Is this the cunning you’re discussing above? Sure seems out of this world to me. I wonder when Janet Daley will come up with an article headlined, ‘There’s Just Too Many People In The World? 43
Posted by James Bowery on Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:23 | # For the record, here is Latham’s response. Yes, it was a form letter that addressed none of the incisive points in my letter: Dear James, Thank you for contacting me to share your concerns regarding immigration As an American, I take pride in the continued interest of many people around I certainly understand the very real hardships faced by people in their native Rather than focusing our efforts on some form of amnesty, such as the I will not compromise in demanding that our laws appropriately address illegal Please be assured I will keep your thoughts in mind as I monitor the Obama Again, thank you for contacting me. It is through your active involvement that Tom Latham 44
Posted by running for congress on Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:56 | # Dear Citizen, Though I hope enough like you do vote for me your concerns are ultimately meaningless to me as you only have one vote; and one vote won’t make or break me. Now kindly do your patriotic duty and go fuck yourself, peasant. I have a bevy of prostitutes and a mountain of cocaine here to attend to. Post a comment:
Next entry: Constituencies of mere disaffection
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) Computer say no by Guessedworker on Thursday, 09 May 2024 15:17. (View) |
Posted by Leon Haller on Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:06 | #
Good letter.
America could have been saved by Reagan in 1981, maybe even by the Gingrich Congress in 1995 (maybe). But Real (white/Christian/Anglo-Saxon) America is no longer recoverable, at least if its dwindling membership continues to be dispersed throughout the whole 50 states.
Nations can only survive as demographic majorities in sovereign territories (the Jews are the one exception proving the rule). Cultural traditions can barely be transmitted to across ethnicities; they cannot be so transmitted to alien races.
The Occident is white. It will only be preserved by whites living in sovereign white-majority polities. The battle to save the West has now definitively (and finally) ‘come home’. Europe is our home. Europe is where the West will live or die. The future for white America is either extinction, or else preservation through a transitional Middle American Nationalism (as Dr. Francis advocated) whose final goal is radical federalist decentralization, or else - better - outright racial secession and sovereignty.
Although I consider myself a Christian conservative, at least in the abstract, the whole Christianist agenda must be abandoned, as surely as the neocon globalist one. I oppose abortion “rights” because my Catholic Church tells me to do so - but why really should I care about it? I have nothing to do with this vile practice; it is not my sin. On the other hand, Democrat socialism and anti-capitalist policies are ruining my economic future, while immigration treason is turning me into an oppressed minority of the future.
The authentic American Right must focus all its energies on three areas: 1) ending all nonwhite immigration (which basically means immigration ‘tout court’); 2) advocating strong public order and crime control policies (including gun rights preservation); and 3) protecting private property, capitalism (though not “free trade” per se), and limited, Constitutional government. This is the very most we can hope for.
Conservatives should abandon foreign policy worries, improving public “education”, and the whole wasteful social agenda (who cares about “sodomite ‘marriage’”, anyway?). Our political capital is ever dwindling, in tandem with our numbers.
Immigration - Crime - Capitalism——> these are all we will be able to worry about going forward.