On the AQ case with Admiral Sir Alan West

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 23:58.

So far, then, Britain has been treated to 7/7, 21/7, Bluewater, the Barot offensive, the West End poets and the inflammatory Glasgow doctors. And let us not forget Richard Reid, the Shoe Bomber. But yesterday, our Prime Minister’s new head security guard informed us:-

We’re talking about such a big change in the way people behave that it’s inevitably going to take 10 to 15 years, and that’s if we’re lucky, and that’s what I hope we can achieve.

I think it would be wrong to pretend otherwise to the British nation.

He then went on to pretend that the Moslems currently domiciled in my homeland can be got to look beyond the palms of their hands and “snitch” on the AQ-intoxicated. The real enemy, apparently, is a “disparate core” of “racist” people, often based abroad, who want power. Elsewhere we learn that “these people are trying to destroy one’s entire way of life.” And that life is, you know, “our” collective Moslem and non-Moslem MultiCult rainbow-dream thingy:-

Britishness does not normally involve snitching or talking about someone. I’m afraid, in this situation, anyone who’s got any information should say something because the people we are talking about are trying to destroy our entire way of life.

“We’ll have to be a little bit unBritish, I think . . . and say something and tell something.

So let’s put the pieces together from a majority perspective.

Mr Security is, obviously, hopeless on the purpose of this multiculturally inconvenient, not to mention offensive offensive. Exalted in government as he is ... raised to the status of the man to whom we must look for a guarantee of life and limb ... bombs to the left of him, Asian doctors to the right ... the Jesus of Safe somehow misses the whole AQ idea.

“What was that you said? Raise the consciousness of the Ummah? Keep it safe from, you know, infidel Britishness by driving a million red hot nails and a hundred truckloads of exploding plant food between the believers and these Western dogs? Radicalise it? Fit it to the purpose of freeing the sacred soil of Islam from hot dogs and the House of Saud? Good lord, no. These GFs are racists. And they want power. And it’s about our way of life. They hate it, y’know.”

Mr Security doesn’t know. Hasn’t the faintest clue. What possible chance is there of the rest of his analysis - the stuff about those, of course, deeply loyal “British and Moslem” snitches - being intellectually sound?

For one thing, the appeal to a Western conscience in the Eastern mind is at best naive - no matter what the Labour Party’s favourite “moderate Muslims” say. A more sincere expression can be found in the al-Madinah Surahs. For instance:-

Surah ix.5,6: “And when the sacred months are passed, kill those who join other gods with God wherever ye shall find them; and seize them, besiege them, and lay wait for them with every kind of ambush: but if they shall convert, and observe prayer and pay the obligatory alms, then let them go their way, for God is Gracious, Merciful. If any one of those who join gods with God ask an asylum of thee, grant him an asylum, that he may hear the Word of God, and then let him reach his place of safety. This, for that they are people devoid of knowledge.”

Surah ix. 29: “Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute (Jizyah) out of hand, and they be humbled.”

Surah ii.214, 215: “They will ask thee concerning war in the Sacred Month. Say: To war therein is bad, but to turn aside from the cause of God, and to have no faith in Him and in the Sacred Temple, and to drive out its people, is worse in the sight of God; and civil strife is worse than bloodshed. They will not cease to war against you until they turn you from your religion, if they be able: but whoever of you shall turn from his religion and die an infidel, their works shall be fruitless in this world, and in the next: they shall be consigned to the fire; therein to abide for aye. But they who believe, and who fly their country, and fight in the cause of God may hope for God’s mercy: and God is Gracious, Merciful.

For another thing, galvanisation is not solely an Ummah bag. Terror is always knowing. In this case, it wants one of the same things as us: guaranteed snitch-free balkanisation. But it wants something more, too. It wants conflict. It wants us to take the punishment and then say, “No, we’ll take no more. We’ll make you pay for every hurt we’ve suffered.” Because the host’s righteous outrage, the host’s rebellion is an essential ingredient to the AQ mix - the surest way to insulate and protect the Ummah from Western spiritual corrosion. We are meant to fight back. Probably we are meant to apply the Old Testament standard of justice.

Not much sign of any understanding of that in the Snitch-King’s vocabulary. What a pity he ever came ashore.

Tags: War on Terror

Comments:

Posted by R. on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:07 | #

You quoted some guy:
“We’re talking about such a big change in the way people behave that it’s inevitably going to take 10 to 15 years, and that’s if we’re lucky, and that’s what I hope we can achieve.

I think it would be wrong to pretend otherwise to the British nation.”

Whoever said that is completely ignorant of the import of ethnic genetic interests, if not the history of his own nation. But don’t feel too bad about that, because my fellow Americans get fed the same sort of slop, and eat it just as greedily. They seem to think that Muslims are the worst threat to their way of life while they are fleeing the cities that are increasingly infested with non-religious blacks, mestizos of numerous and indeterminable religious beliefs, and orientals who are always - to us - inscrutable.

From an historical standpoint - specifically, a white ethnic historical standpoint - we have always been at war with the Muslim, whenever we or they have encroached upon the other’s territory and jeapordized their egi. The solution to this problem is quite simple, but the masters of both of us would not have it that way.

It is easy enough - and quite a supportable accusation - to blame Jewish interests and influence for generating this problem; it is quite another matter to find cohesion among our own people based solely upon the need for such cohesion in the face of enemies who survive only by exercising their right to protect and promote their own egi.

If we wait “10 to 15 years from now [...] if we’re lucky”, it will be too late.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:23 | #

For me it helps to bear in mind these clueless, wrong-headed, or bought individuals who get appointed to these positions, or ones like George Bush who get elected to them, are appointed or (in elections) funded, touted, and pushed, precisely for their cluelessness, wrong-headedness, or being for sale. If you don’t keep that in mind you’re liable to look at all the specimens of this sort who wind up in office and, on the “default” assumption that they’re pretty much a random political/bureaucratic sampling, say to yourself, “Gee, there must be almost nobody out there but their kind.” No. There are plenty of our kind out there but the money men and string-pullers only choose the kind we keep seeing lording it over us.

We don’t see the money men and string pullers but we know they’re there the way astronomers know invisible planets are there orbiting distant stars by their influence on the movements of the bodies we can see.

It’s no accident a rabid race-replacement fanatic became the GOP candidate in 2000: the behind-the-scenes money men and string-pullers without any doubt whatsoever had him picked years in advance as a man to back, based on what was certainly longstanding knowledge of his firm opposition to the existence of a border with Mexico — something no one else knew about, but they did because they make it their business to know these things. Through the aberrant movements of his presidency we deduce the gravitational interference of the invisible bodies orbiting him, the behind-the-scenes money men, fund-raisers, and string-pullers who put him where he is. The same applies to this clueless admiral. These truly pathetic appointments are not politicallly random but are specifically requested by the unseen interests who, though hidden, are very much there and call most or all of the shots, naming the specific individuals by name whom they want placed in this or that position based on what they already know of his sympathy for race-replacement, or his malleability, or his corruptibility. That’s how people like Sir Ian Blair and this admiral rise to power over us. By carefully observing the peculiarities of George Bush’s, Tony Blair’s, Sir Ian Blair’s, Ted Cantle’s, and this man’s orbits we may deduce the presence nearby of unseen planets.

Posted by Scimitar on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:29 | #

Gordon Brown might actually be a good thing for Britain. In a way, he reminds of Bush - a bumbling, uncharismatic, pig-headed incompetant. I can see him also becoming a symbol of the despised status quo. Then again, I’m not English, so I don’t want to read much into this.

Posted by Amalek on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:45 | #

“So far, then, Britain has been treated to 7/7, 21/7, Bluewater, the Barot offensive, the West End poets and the inflammatory Glasgow doctors. And let us not forget Richard Reid, the Shoe Bomber.”

In other words, penny-ante stuff which is not worth losing a wink of sleep over.

GW, you sound more and more like a hysterical dupe of neoconnerie. The Scary Muslim is a chimera compared with the measures we are told must be taken to root him out. Sensible Brits are treating these latest Terrifying Near-Misses as a joke timed to demonstrate how on the ball our new PM’s surveillance will be.

Here’s some horse sense on the subject from Matthew Parris:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/matthew_parris/article2039719.ece

The British Establishment has been leading terrorists on and miraculously foiling them in the nick of time since the Powder Plot. Do stop having conniptions like a YANK, dear boy.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:39 | #

Matthew Parrish is a moron. He has no concept of ultimate costs. It’s all brown, black, white and yellow, linked arm and arm, in a new hue Britannia!

John Smeaton is another prime example.

http://westernstandard.blogs.com/shotgun/2007/07/smeaton-dishes-.html

It’s hopeless.

Posted by Amalek on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:08 | #

Fred Scrooby: “Excuse me, but 7/7 ??? “Penny-ante”???”

Yes, it was, and moreover it was two years ago. Think how many 7/7s a week they get in “liberated” Baghdad. We’ve been let off damn lightly for our 90 years of messing about with the Middle East. God must love us after all.

(Besides, there are some mighty smelly details in the official 7/7 story…)