Posted by q on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:44 | #

The evolution of virulence is perhaps the greatest threat of immigration specifically and globalization generally—which is precisely why we are never allowed to hear about it from the old media.

And the herd of beta Pachyderms in Washington are too wimpy to fight.

Posted by IQ on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:39 | #

And the herd of beta Pachyderms in Washington are too wimpy to fight.

And because the Jews control the media!  Our only hope is microcommunities.

Posted by Dasein on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:36 | #

Nature and Science are hopelessly PC.  There was a series of articles in one of the two a year or so back where they discussed the dearth of minority faculty in sciences, particularly at elite colleges (the James Sherley case at MIT was what set it off).  Not a single mention of IQ in any of the articles.  Nature commissioned ‘opposing’ editorial viewpoints on whether racial IQ differences should be studied.  Both agreed that there was no hereditary basis for the differences.  A complete joke.

Group selection is an example of stuff anti-White people don’t like.  Here’s Razib commenting on the fact that DS Wilson is writing for HuffPo:

http://scienceblogs.com/gnxp/2009/04/group_selection_in_the_huffing.php

‘probably a net positive asset’, ‘In any case’.  I get the impression that Razib would be upset if group (or multilevel) selection were ever accepted more widely (from what I’ve read, the gnxp contributors are very opposed to it).  There are obvious reasons why certain people would prefer that it doesn’t gain credence.  It’s like Jobling arguing against there being any heriditary basis for ethnocentrism.  These are cans of worms they would rather keep closed.

Posted by Ben Tillman on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:08 | #

Yeah, Lewontin for some reason didn’t grasp the significance of Wilson’s work, but another Tribesman (Scott Atran) certainly did. 

I get the impression that Razib would be upset if group (or multilevel) selection were ever accepted more widely (from what I’ve read, the gnxp contributors are very opposed to it).  There are obvious reasons why certain people would prefer that it doesn’t gain credence.

Multilevel selection theory, from another perspective, is multilevel organization theory.  The thesis of MacDonald’s first book on Jewry is that Jews practice a group evolutionary strategy (i.e., in Wilson’s terms, they have formed an organism at a higher level of organization).  The thesis of his second book is that the Jewish group strategy will produce reactive group strategies.  The thesis of his third book is that Jews have engaged in intellectual and political activity to disorganize Whites and prevent the development of a reactive group strategy.  Wilson’s work provides the theoretical foundation for all of MacDonald’s work.

Posted by SM on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:29 | #

Multilevel selection theory, from another perspective, is multilevel organization theory.  The thesis of MacDonald’s first book on Jewry is that Jews practice a group evolutionary strategy (i.e., in Wilson’s terms, they have formed an organism at a higher level of organization).  The thesis of his second book is that the Jewish group strategy will produce reactive group strategies.  The thesis of his third book is that Jews have engaged in intellectual and political activity to disorganize Whites and prevent the development of a reactive group strategy.  Wilson’s work provides the theoretical foundation for all of MacDonald’s work.

I agree with that, of course.

I would add “unwittingly” to “Jews practice a group evolutionary strategy”. It is the same way leopards having dapple-shadow-pattern camouflage is unwitting. It is simply a variant [cutaneous] module that formed and got selected unbeknownst to the haver; Same with the ‘jew troublemaker migrant’ memes.

[Memes are created by material bio chemical modules; these bio chemical reflex inducers are created and shaped by nature AND nurture patterns; patterns often created by the meme effects…]

In short, hives don’t know they are well oiled machines of conquest (and or parasite sortie-ites) selected to be just that.

1) how to stop it now?

2) how to prevent it from ever working again?

We could also add “establishment elites in general” as in “jews—and establishment elites—practice, unwittingly, a group evol…”.

—————-
Smart whites are smarter than the jews, IMO. The white system/caste structure is simply vulnerable to jewish memes / sortie/ colonization.

[Nervous system and glandular : media and law = magnum parasites. As I said before it is very similar to the barnacle on crab parallel.]

==========
Does anyone have a bell curve chart on jew vs white IQ? Meaning, what is the jewish curve’s knee, hard or soft? If it is as soft as the goy than there are some real smart jews out there; given their small population, those fuckers are very, very alone. But note Jew elites will be conformed to by and large, IMO, by the jew mode (112?), unlike the “individualistic” goy mode (100ish) who think they have “a right” to do it their own [cockeyed] underling way.

Posted by SM on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:50 | #

{heh, I’m responding to my own post.}

I think a relevant portion of the jewish curve is clustered around the western professional community—126. Not so smart that they get bogged down with any real thinking or creative talents, but plenty smart enough to convince lowers of what ever they want (especially since they are polishing a standard envy module and appealing using protectionism awe-ing ly, which is especially effective against the horrible capitalists [easily demonized as selfish first, leaders second/third]).

The chimp ‘alpha beta gamma’ principle verbatim.

Also—as some of you know—intelligence isn’t simply of one kind. Each person/group is cityscape bar graph of attributes. If one is low in certain categories but high in other it benefits that individual/group in certain arenas.

Posted by Dasein on Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:21 | #

Lots of wishful thinking on group selection on display over at gnxp:

http://scienceblogs.com/gnxp/2009/06/group_selection_red_in_tooth_a.php#comments

Deep down, I think Razib knows he may be f***ed.  Can the multicult propaganda keep up with reality of increasing racial tension?  I wouldn’t want to be depending on it.

The paper he references looks interesting:

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/324/5932/1293

Posted by SM on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:24 | #

A relevant aside…

At the top of the page at the link:

“new paper in Science, Did Warfare Among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers Affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors?,”

Are modern western intellects even serious with this stuff?

What a dysgenic disaster democracy is.

An Age o Reaosn, in our time…

Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:51 | #

Shit Monger, I don’t care what GT’s sock-puppet (I’m sorry, I mean “cyber entity”) says, you are a mouth breather.  And a moron.

Posted by SM on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:35 | #

What are you blabbering about, you absolute dunce.

Posted by Dov Henis on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:10 | #

Evolution, Genetics And Culture

Is there no Science except for the Establishment’s alone, and is Peer Approved the Establishment’s only apostle?

A. From “Adaptation and the evolution of parasite virulence in a connected world”

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature08071.html
Adaptation is conventionally regarded as occurring at the level of the individual organism, even if some posit the idea of adaptation at the group level.

This from Nature advance online publication 27 May 2009, Received 13 January 2009, Accepted 9 April 2009, Published online 27 May 2009. Nature is a member of the Science Guild Establishment, of course.

B. There is no Science except for the Establishment’s alone, and Peer Approved is the Establishment’s only apostle

The Science Guild Establishment, since its Mount Sinai Revelation as AAAS, has been prostituting all aspects of science, including the meanings of the terms science, scientists and research. It monopolized all terminology and publications of information, blocking insights and evolution of science. It turned the organization and activities of science into a ludicrous caricature of a corrupt trade union. This is the origin and explanation of the circa 100 years old black hole in science and of the zero effect of science on societal evolution during the still ongoing 20th century technology culture.

C. Culture, and, yes, intelligence, are ubiquitous traits of ALL matter, not just of life but including life

Adaptation is culture. And culture is the driver of Universal Evolution, of all evolutions.
“Rethink Unified Field Theory And Evolution”
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/60/122.page#982

Animate and inanimate materials differ from each other in the capability of responding (intelligence) and in the mode and speed of responding (culture) to circumstances. These differences are due to the energetic constructs differences between animate and inanimate materials.

D. Yes, there is Science outside the Establishment’s, and Peer Approved is not its only apostle,

Suggesting,

Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
Updated Life’s Manifest May 2009
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=495&#e;ntry412704;http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/140/122.page#2321
EVOLUTION Beyond Darwin 200
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=405&#e;ntry396201;http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/100/122.page#1407