Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:22 | #

The rich people (like Warren Buffett, Ted Turner, and Bill Gates, not to menion all Jewish rich people) pushing obvious outrages like making newly-arrived non-whites just off the plane eligible for affirmative action (for non-Americans reading this, affirmative action is a euphemism for the granting of preferences to non-whites over whites in all sorts of social, educational, employment, and job-promotion categories (AA was originally “sold” as “compensation” for the supposed set-back inflicted on U.S. Negroes by slavery, a “set-back” not suffered by any non-white who’s just stepping off the plane in 2008, yet they’re all, all these newly-arrived non-whites, eligible for it) — the rich people pushing this stuff which gets whites extremely angry must know they’re playing with fire.  All of them are smarter than the average commenter posting on this site, for example, and every one of us sees it clearly.  You have to wonder why they persist in what appears to be an actual effort to provoke.  The Jews doing it of course want to quash whites and ultimately replace them with Negroes and so forth.  But why are the Euros countenancing the outrage?  It may be they’re scared either way:  scared of proven Jew-and-communist-led Negro violence if they don’t support it, and scared of possible white explosion if they keep supporting it.  Maybe they don’t know what to do, and are putting on a calm front but are jittery, nervous, not sleeping nights.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:45 | #

We talked about the role of violence in the other thread by the way (and I oppose violence:  I want to get this done without it), and the fact is the other side didn’t pull off its 60s revolution without using violence:  it subjected U.S. society to lots of carefully planned and orchestrated violence, and when there wasn’t actual “hot” violence the other side kept the constant threat of Negro violence in the form of massive urban rioting, together with white-terrorist violence, hanging over the heads of the old WASP establishment purely to intimidate and force concessions, force surrender, and force withdrawal as they, the revolutionaries, moved in to take over the abandoned social control levers.  While our side today, contemplating its counterattack, wishes to eschew violence largely out of principle but also for practical reasons (right now the other side is stronger, and that’s the best pratical reason imaginable), the other side had no such compunction during its take-over in the 1960s and early ‘70s:  carefully planned and orchstrated violence was very much a part of how it won:  by scaring the WASPs. 

Now, the 1989-91 revolution in Eastern Europe that threw off communism was virutally completely non-violent.  (There was a little violence but comparatively very little.)  That’s what I want for our side:  something non-violent like that.  I am confident that if we don’t have our internet access shut down we’ll ultimately win through exactly that kind of non-violent “people’s revolution.”  The number of web-sites sympathetic with our views must have grown something like several-hundredfold just in the last six or seven years. 

If the Jews succeed, however, in shutting down our internet access, things could — and they should — get dicey out there.  In that circumstance, I would support our side’s letting loose with everything it had because there would be nothing left to lose.  Knowing we might let loose may in fact ultimately prevent the other side from daring to take that final step in literally shutting down our access.

For now I strongly recommend non-violence, like the East Germans of 1989 who totally without violence brought the Berlin Wall crashing down, followed of course by the chain reaction all saw which spread to the whole East European communist world.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:57 | #

Let’s also hope there’ll be members of the officer corps of the Armed Forces on our side so if the crunch ever does come we’ll at least have a fighting chance.  The only way that will happen is if today’s young officers who are sympathetic to our side keep their opinions to themselves so they won’t be weeded out by the political commissars and will be able to rise to tomorrow’s top positions.

Posted by Armor on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:09 | #

if we don’t have our internet access shut down we’ll ultimately win (—Fred Scrooby)

What is funny is that western governments have been organizing race replacement, and helping the development of the internet at the same time.
They must be confused in their heads!

Posted by Jupiter on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:14 | #

Fred

Native Born White Americans in the US military are very likely to have brothers,sisters and cousins who are going to be viciously persecuted in various ways by post-1965 non-whites. Moreover, they will figure out- real fast-if they are not a life-that once they are out of the military they will have no future.

Posted by Jupiter on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:16 | #

Fred

YES WE CAN!!!!! HE HE HA HA

Posted by Mr. Xplkbl on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:38 | #

if we don’t have our internet access shut down we’ll ultimately win

Whites can win without the Internet or jewzmedia.  Shutting down White nationalist access to the Internet may be in our race’s best interests - resulting in less talk and more racially populist community, economic, and political action on the ground.  If not, then our race doesn’t deserve to survive.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:03 | #

“Native Born White Americans in the US military are very likely to have brothers,sisters and cousins who are going to be viciously persecuted in various ways by post-1965 non-whites. Moreover, they will figure out- real fast-if they are not a life-that once they are out of the military they will have no future.”  (—Jupiter)

Right, but they have to keep their mouths shut — I’m talking here mainly about the career officer corps — and pretend to agree with all the PC platitudes, otherwise they won’t get promoted and when the crunch comes (pray God it never will) we won’t have anyone on our side who’ll refuse orders to fire on us.

They have to keep their mouths SHUT — so they can rise in rank.  Don’t tell their views to their “buddies” (there are a lot of blabbermouths around), don’t tell them to ANYONE.  Keep them strictly private.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:06 | #

Of course the other side will eventually try to get around that by refusing to promote white officers at all, restricting all promotions in the army (and in the civilian police) to non-whites.  The Jews will certainly try for that situation.  But at present we’re still a ways from that.

Posted by Captainchaos on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:34 | #

RACE WAR!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnT8Ubogdog

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:05 | #

On the topic of the anti-white quota system we have here in the States known as Affirmative Action (see first comment in the thread), a new piece up tonight at Vdare.com sheds a little light on how much gets taken out of white people’s hides every year in dollar equivalent, in order to maintain this AA outrage:

Peter Brimelow, writing with co-author Leslie Spencer several years ago in Forbes, calculated the cumulative affirmative action cost to the U.S. economy at $225 billion, or four percent of GDP for the year 1991.  In other words, had the funds spent to enforce and comply with affirmative action programs since their inception been put to other, more productive uses, GDP would have been four percent higher in 1991. [<u>When quotas replace merit, everybody suffers</u>, Forbes, February 15, 1993; http://www.vdare.com/pb/when_quotas.htm ]

If Brimelow’s four percent figure is accurate (and to my knowledge no one has ever challenged it), the cost of affirmative action programs would currently be about $540 billion.

But fifteen years have passed since Brimelow made his calculation. Even if the same programs were in place, their impact would be larger today because they have been in existence longer. The economic cost of affirmative action compounds annually, as the growth path of the economy increasingly diverges from its potential.

Bottom line:  The misallocation that cost 4 percent of that GDP in 1991 could easily cost 8 percent GDP today (2007).  That implies a $1.1 trillion economic loss from affirmative action programs —  a whopping $3,667 taken from every man, woman, and child in the country.

In a study recent published by the National Policy Institute I estimated the cost and benefits of affirmative action programs by race:  [see table of figures in original text at link below] the biggest losers are Asians, who lose an estimated $40,000 per family.  This amount reflects the taxes, compliance costs, and —  most importantly —  the loss of income associated with being on the wrong side of the affirmative action playing field.

White families lose about half as much as their Asian counterparts, while Hispanics benefit even more than blacks.

Proponents of race based preferences claim that the benefits of such programs outweigh their costs. Ending, or at least reducing, discrimination in hiring and pay practices is surely a benefit worth paying for.  Yet many economists believe discrimination is rare or non-existent in a capitalist economy such as ours.  Gary Becker, a 1992 Nobel laureate, exposed the flawed rationale behind affirmative action programs in The Economics of Discrimination (1957).  In a free market, Becker argued, there is an inexorable tendency for everyone to be paid the marginal value of his or her labor.  This means that ultimately, you are likely to be paid something like what your work is worth.  If you are in an unpopular group —  a racial minority, for example —  employers may pay you less.  But that means they will make more money off you.  Because you will be such a profitable hire, other employers will demand your services, and your wages will be bid up.  Employers who pay minority workers less than their “marginal product” will lose those workers to competitors.

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/081110_nd.htm

Posted by Realitaet on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:36 | #

Scrooby: “when the crunch comes (pray God it never will)”

NO, a “crunch” type event is exactly what is needed for Whites to wake up on a mass or semi-mass scale; without a catalyst/crunch event people will remain apathetic (posting on internet message boards instead of getting out in public and actually doing something) while their country increasingly turns in to a Jew-run third world PC police state.

The internet is a great tool for distracting people, and as such there is no way that the elites would take it away because this would again force people in to actually speaking and working with with each other in the real world as opposed to the fake cyberworld.  Things get done and change is implemented in the real world (which they do not want), while in the cyberworld there is only endless talk (preaching to the choir) and running around in circles; nothing real ever gets accomplished on the internet, just a bunch of petty theorizing and endless articles.

Like it was in Europe of the 1920s-30s, maybe this economic mess we are currently in can be the catalyst/crunch we are looking for, especially when it comes to criticizing the Jewish role in finance/economics and getting Whites economically reorganized to their benefit.

The internet is an excellent tool for communication and idea sharing, and should definitely be utilized in order to inform-discuss-organize, but the only way to actually change things is to put boots on the ground and work with other like-minded people IN PERSON to accomplish your goals. 

Do you really think you’ll be able to implement a change in attitudes and policy from behind a keyboard?  If so, you are deluded—while you continue typing away in internet fantasyland for years on end the outside world (reality) will continue to degenerate because you didn’t speak up in the real world sooner and attempt to gain wider acceptance of your ideas, beliefs, and policies.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:48 | #

No one’s participation at this site is stopping anything from happening in the “real world.”  Everyone who prefers to take the “boots on the ground” approach has always been free to do so.  If they are not doing so, it’s not because of people commucating via internet.  It’s for some other reason.

Both are needed:  boots on the ground are needed, and so is the refining of our side’s ideas.

We are in a gestation period.  When the baby is ready, it will be born.

Posted by Realitaet on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:25 | #

How long has this baby been gestating?  40+ years?  I’d say it’s beyond time for the baby to be born - any more gestation and we might as well assume the baby is a stillborn.

The times are beyond ripe for racialist-based change, as tens of millions of White Americans are filled with a sense of dread at the prospect of their nation slowly being turned in to a third-world jew-led cesspool, with White racial consciousness tacitly understood by many but rarely spoken; meanwhile ennui is endemic across many White majority communities in the U.S. as they continue to be economically and socially dispossessed in their own land and after having been failed by the pitiful Republican Party for the past few decades. There is a major opportunity right now, a huge void waiting to be filled amongst White Americans, but it’s going to take more boots on the ground and less cybertheorizing.

We can lead by example, by indentifying White leaders people can look up to and then organizing White consciousness-raising groups locally/regionally in the real world via them instead of continuing to wallow in our resentment on the impersonal internet.

We’ve got to move beyond this passive, do-nothing cyber mentality if White group consciousness is ever going gain a foothold in the rapidly disintegrating United States.

Perhaps the establishment of an organization called “The National Association for the Preservation of White People” (or some variant thereof) is in order?  This would be an especially potent gesture if it was founded and built up during the opening years of the Obama Administration…

Posted by Mr. Xplkbl on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:08 | #

The Air Force is a preview of things to come in the U.S. Army and Marine Corps. The latter services are well on the way in following the former’s lead in racially integrating the officer corps. Although help would certainly be accepted from this quarter, it’s foolish and cowardly to pin our hopes on it. Waiting for “rogue officers” to appear is a prescription for racial suicide.  Not to mention that such is unlikely to happen without our having established political legitimacy over large districts and territories.

This is reality, not Seven Days In May (1964) starring Kirk Douglas and Burt Lancaster.

Posted by John on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:18 | #

Hundred Flowers Campaign

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:21 | #

John’s raising the possibility of an interesting interpretation:  click on his “Hundred Flowers Campaign” link and you’ll see what it is (“Have fun now, guys; all you’re doing is helping us by exposing yourselves, so we can crack down on you later”). 

We have internet freedom now because the ADL, the AJC, the SPLC, and the other Jewish groups have not yet succeeded in shutting it down.  But they’re working as hard as they can behind the scenes toward that end, exactly as they worked as hard as they could behind the scenes after their 1924 defeat to pry the country’s borders open to the non-white Third World — finally succeeding in 1965.

The Jews are patient.  They take the long view.  If they have to work decades to accomplish a goal, they quietly work decades.  Centuries?  They work centuries.  Millennia?  Millennia.  They don’t lose sight of their goal.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:25 | #

(My point in my last comment being I didn’t agree with the interpretation John was raising, since the other side is trying hard to take away our internet access, on grounds of “hate.”  But it’s an interesting thought he came up with, an interesting comparison with the “Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom, Let a Hundred Schools of Thought Contend” policy of Peking’s of the mid-1950s.)

Posted by John on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:06 | #

John’s raising the possibility of an interesting interpretation:  click on his “Hundred Flowers Campaign” link and you’ll see what it is (“Have fun now, guys; all you’re doing is helping us by exposing yourselves, so we can crack down on you later”).

We have internet freedom now because the ADL, the AJC, the SPLC, and the other Jewish groups have not yet succeeded in shutting it down.  But they’re working as hard as they can behind the scenes toward that end, exactly as they worked as hard as they could behind the scenes after their 1924 defeat to pry the country’s borders open to the non-white Third World — finally succeeding in 1965.

The Jews are patient.  They take the long view.  If they have to work decades to accomplish a goal, they quietly work decades.  Centuries?  They work centuries.  Millennia?  Millennia.  They don’t lose sight of their goal.

I was answering Armor:

What is funny is that western governments have been organizing race replacement, and helping the development of the internet at the same time.
They must be confused in their heads!

but in the post where I originally quoted him, I couldn’t get the web reference to work, so I guess the mod deleted it.

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:17 | #

I don’t think it is reasonable to compare the current situation with the Internet providing additional openness to that obtaining under Mao’s program of “openness” betrayed.  Despite abuses of government agencies like the IRS to suppress political speech that continue to go unpunished, the myth of the “Bill of Rights” is still quite alive in the mind of the populous.  This can form a scaffold for resistance, particularly during times when central authorities are so obviously corrupt.

Posted by Gudmund on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:18 | #

We have internet freedom now because the ADL, the AJC, the SPLC, and the other Jewish groups have not yet succeeded in shutting it down.

Forgive me for stating the obvious, but if the internet goes, we’re really up the creek.  We can’t have discussions like those at this site in “civil society.”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:21 | #

“I was answering Armor”  (—John)

Right.  That was how I was interpreting your comment, as an answer to him.

Posted by John on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:57 | #

Sehr gute Nachtricht von Berlin:

http://www.spiegel.de/video/video-40242.html

Die Studenten haben eine judische Austellung zerstört.

Hoffentlich, beginnt damit der Volkzorn!

Posted by John on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:59 | #

Ausstellung

Posted by Red Mercury on Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:52 | #

^^ What Orion14 said, above. Violence works.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:45 | #

“Violence works.”  (—Red seconding Orion)

Except when it doesn’t, and suddenly you have lots more problems than when you started, more than you ever dreamed possible, like finding yourself at ground zero in Dresden and Hiroshima.  Way to get a really bad migraine.

If violence comes by itself, it will come, and soon enough, and no one will be able to stop it.  That’ll be the start of the REAL NIGHTMARE.

DON’T wish for it.  It’s NOT what we want.  What we want is more people like us to wake up or come out of hiding and get this done peacefully. 

(Furthermore, how do you think Dumb-and-Dumber got entrapped in that ADL sting?  By Jewish agents whipping them up into shooting their mouths off about planning violence.  Enough said.)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:15 | #

My feelings about Senator McCain are that he should be expelled from the Senate while taking care to prevent his fleeing the country to avoid arrest, then immediately arrested and put on trial on capital charges of high treason and collaboration in crimes against humanity.  (President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld should of course also be arrested and tried on various capital charges including war crimes, crimes against humanity, and high treason — the first two as soon as they leave office, since they can’t be arrested now unless impeached.)

All of that said (said in order to clarify first my view of John McCain), the following excerpt makes excellent points, which deserve to be widely understood:

European-Americans did not elect Obama.  They voted overwhelmingly against him, voting for McCain by a margin that would be termed a landslide victory if it applied to the total electorate.  The American electorate remains deeply divided on race, despite the claims that this election proves that everything about race has changed in this country, that race is no longer a consideration in elections, and that we are now all united in our support for a president of color who will lead us on a path that will transcend race —  that will be the end of our race.

The racial change heralded by this election is not a deep change in racial attitudes, concerns or preferences, but an ongoing demographic change in the racial composition of the population and electorate.  That is the difference between the results of this election and what the results would have been in a similar contest as recently as eight years ago.

So European-Americans and Europeans around the world, our racial kinsmen in Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, should not be dismayed or discouraged by what they are told by their elites —  the triumphalist spin spouted by multiracialists, racial Marxists and non-European peoples the world over, that the once-great European people of America have been overthrown, that we have been transformed by a racial revolution that has overcome racial considerations and loyalties and cast them, and us, forever into the dustbin of history.

Quite the opposite, they should take heart.  The fact is we are still here, and we have not changed, and we have not surrendered.  We have not collapsed like the South Africans in 1994.  The great majority of us still vote for the interests of our race, with strong racial preferences and concerns, in spite of strong competition from other major issues and problems.

What has changed, and is changing, are the racial proportions of our population.  That is the transformation that is taking place:  our replacement and dispossession by demographic change.  This is the same transformation that is happening in most of the other European homelands.  It is not a transformation of our values and loyalties, our beliefs and spirit.  We have survived this test intact, and as a result will be more ready than ever for the tests to come.

Posted by Robert Reis on Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:10 | #

11/09/2008
Fight To Reveal Obama’s Birth Certificate Continues
By John P. Connolly, The Bulletin

Two of the plaintiffs in court cases against Sen. Barack Obama, the president-elect, are working to move their cases forward before his presidential inauguration.

Philip J. Berg, the attorney who filed suit against Mr. Obama challenging him to produce his original birth certificate to prove he meets the constitutional requirements to serve as U.S. president. Mr. Berg filed a Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court late in October, in an effort to force Mr. Obama to produce the document.

Accordingly, the U.S. Supreme Court has said that Mr. Obama, the DNC and all co-defendants are to respond to the writ, on or before Dec. 1.

The judge in Mr. Berg’s original case ruled that Mr. Berg does not have standing to enforce the constitutional requirements on a presidential candidate. Mr. Berg appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court.

“I look forward to receiving defendant Obama’s response to the writ and am hopeful the U. S. Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”

Mr. Obama put an electronic photo of a birth certification on his “Fight the Smears” Web site, a document that his critics have found unconvincing. The raised seal and authoritative signature needed to validate the document cannot be seen on the scan. The Obama campaign was unwilling to release the original document to the court when Mr. Berg filed suit in August, choosing instead to argue against Mr. Berg’s standing.

Mr. Berg asserts that Mr. Obama was born in Kenya, as his mother, Ann Dunham, was denied entry to the plane home due to her advanced pregnancy. Since she was only 18 at the time of Mr. Obama’s birth, she would not have passed citizenship on to Mr. Obama. In 1961, citizenship could only be passed on to a child where one parent was an alien should the citizen parent have resided in the U.S. for 10 years, five of those over the age of 14.

The State of Hawaii has refused to release copies of Mr. Obama’s birth certificate, because Department of Health officials say the privacy statutes of the state prevent them from doing so to anyone who does not have a “direct and tangible interest” in the record as prescribed in the state statute.

In Honolulu, Andy Martin, a longtime critic of Mr. Obama, filed a lawsuit in October, in an attempt to get the Hawaiian Department of Health to release Mr. Obama’s birth certificate records. Mr. Martin announced last week that he plans to get members of the Electoral College to pressure Mr. Obama into presenting his birth certificate.

“We are going to start organizing a ‘Goal Line Stand’ in the Electoral College to force Barack Obama to produce his original 1961 birth certificate for review by the American people,” Mr. Martin said. “Republicans, conservatives and independents have a new rallying point. Don’t let Obama pass through the Electoral College until he has produced his original birth certificate and ended the mystery shrouding his origins.”

No one, aside from Department of Health officials, has seen the original document. Mr. Martin has a court hearing on Nov. 18 in the Circuit Court for Honolulu, Hawaii to continue his case.

John P. Connolly can be reached

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:43 | #

Regarding the article pasted in Robert Reis’ comment:  I wish these people would use that energy to fight open borders.  There are codes already written in U.N. documents and elsewhere defining genocide for example as exactly what’s being perpetrated through open borders, and there are courts where those documents and those codes have legal standing.  Instead of doggedly filing law suits against the Obama campaign, how about doggedly filing a few against genocide-by-immigration?

Also, Democrat Party operatives will have had the opportunity to doctor Obama’s birth certificate many times over by now, if necessary simply reducing the real one to ash long since, and replacing it with an expertly-crafted fake.  If there was anything disqualifying in the original it has long since been ... “corrected,” shall we say?  It has long since been ... corrected.  Does anyone actually suppose the Dem Party hasn’t had full access to the original, to tamper with as they please?  Get real.

Our fight isn’t with Obama’s having won, so much as it is with the (fill in the blank) _______ influences on the political process that have given us both Obama and McCain and done everything else that’s fundamentally bad to our country these sixty years.  Disqualify Obama on grounds of “place of birth” and there’ll just be another mark-II version as soon as the (fill in the blank) _______ can arrange it, and that won’t be long in coming:  Obama was wholly a (fill in the blank) _______ creation.  He wasn’t the first such, not by a long shot, nor will he be the last.  Obama is an artillery shell fired at us and at all we hold dear.  We can expend all our energy trying to swat that shell out of the sky while awaiting the next one fired at us, or we can use some of our energy to do something about the cannon firing all these shells at us.

Posted by James Bowery on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:22 | #

The sharp rise in the “race war” queries has fallen just as sharply back down to the prior level.

It remains to be seen if this will be a one-time blip or not, but in either case, the discontinuity here is striking.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:36 | #

Odds & Ends

The U.S. and U.K. white establisments badly wanted this man installed 26 years ago and saw to it, stabbing Ian Smith in the back.  Thanks to their excellent judgement, today a dozen eggs there costs four hundred billion dollars. 

http://mahalanobis.twoday.net/stories/5084244/

These, don’t forget, are the same U.S. and U.K. white establishments who’ve opened our borders and stand guard snarling and snapping viciously at anyone who even thinks of closing them again.  Doubtless their judgement, so sound in the other case, will prove likewise sound in this.

And here’s news the Vatican will really like, as it holds out the promise of additional questionable populations it can tell Catholic white women they’re morally obligated to marry and procreate with, once the project is up and running in high gear:

http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/neandertals/neandertal_dna/neanderchimp-baby-cloning-2008.html

Posted by Thunder on Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:28 | #

You know Fred this thing about women gets me.  They will, generally, buy into that.  I have met very few women who are really racially aware.  It is probably biologically stronger in males.  My younger daughter is one such woman.  She strictly prefers white men.  But even my wife who is quite racially aware has referred to the sexual attractiveness of some black men.  Her head snapped when I said something like so you would prefer to live in a world run by blacks or are you just talking about ***king?

Anyhow most women would quickly, en masse, accept a campaign pushing them into inter-racial marriage.  I have to be honest it bothers me.  White men should control their women better.

Posted by PTET on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:44 | #

Interesting post.

Compare Google Trends for “Race War” with “War On Drugs”
http://tinyurl.com/55r2c8

The “erratic behavior early in the graph” doesn’t seem to be due to “early errors in sampling”.

The Jews doing it of course want to quash whites and ultimately replace them with Negroes and so forth.

Crikey. You do have some nutters around here…

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:51 | #

I looked at PTET’s blog and can’t tell what he supports and opposes.  He seems to oppose Islam but I’m not certain.  If he’s online only to oppose Islam he’s of extremely limited interest.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:24 | #

For the record:  I don’t oppose Islam.  Quite the contrary, I deeply respect it (with a small handful of reservations).  What I oppose is Moslems being admitted in excessive numbers to live in the Eurosphere.  That’s not because I don’t like or respect Moslems but because the Eurosphere is for non-Moslem religions, non-Moslem cultures, and non-Moslem races.  In this universe there’s right and there’s wrong, and it’s wrong to take things that don’t belong in B ram them down B’s throat.

Posted by silver on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:14 | #

Every European should reserve a place in his heart to despise Islam.  I’ll respect them when (a) they’re safely behind the Mediterranean and Bosphorus, and (b) they grovel and apologise to us for the first time in their miserable lives.  Until then, to hell with them.

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:39 | #

At last.  A Serb.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:41 | #

Don’t encourage him, GW.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:35 | #

Fred,

The youngster from Australia looking for information regarding immigration/multiculturalism, in which thread did it appear? If you recall the thread, direct them to Drew Fraser. 

Thanks,

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:35 | #

Desmond, it was Chrissy in this thread:

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/ethnic_makeup_of_australia/

Posted by EA Steve on Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:25 | #

Every European should reserve a place in his heart to despise Islam.  I’ll respect them when (a) they’re safely behind the Mediterranean and Bosphorus, and (b) they grovel and apologise to us for the first time in their miserable lives.  Until then, to hell with them.

Posted by silver on Thursday, November 27, 2008 at 07:14 PM | #

Absolutely correct, Silver! After what those muslims did to our ancestors, they can stick with their sand for all I care. For over a millenium, Islam has tormeted our people; and now it’s back to try to finish us off again! Within the historical context hereof, I will not bow down to the people who vow to subjugate (and maybe kill) us, and rape all of our women.

http://www.amren.com/videos/20060203london_protest/index.html

Posted by Darren on Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:24 | #

Absolutely correct, Silver! After what those muslims did to our ancestors, they can stick with their sand for all I care. (EA Steve)

What can be said about non-European Muslims can be said about many of our fellow folk, past and present. Let us not delve into our own historical record to prove this point here.

I agree with Fred that they do not belong in our lands. However, among them you will find people who actually have the will power to fight and die for their people and way of life and are opposed to the decadence of modern society.

If you’re looking for someone to blame, I suggest you look at our leaders who created this mess. Jews and Jewntile whites. Muslims would not be a problem in a healthy society that respected and defended its borders.

Posted by silver on Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:23 | #

Muslims would not be a problem in a healthy society that respected and defended its borders.

Neither would Mexicans but that doesn’t stop you railing you against the ‘beaners.’  When you’re given lemons, make lemon juice.  And lemons don’t come much juicier than Islam.

At last.  A Serb.

Sigh.  I’ve opposed Islam from the beginning, GW.  It’s hardly worth talking about since the race issue so greatly outweighs it, and taking care of that will take care of Islam with the same stone. 

You really do insist on hanging your hat on this “Identity” thing, don’t you.  I can’t buy it.  I don’t think anyone will.  I don’t oppose Islam just because it’s the Serb thing to do.  It’s a Christian thing, it’s an atheist thing, it’s a liberal thing, it’s a cultural thing, it’s a broadly European thing, it’s, indeed, a non-Muslim thing.  I can understand why you’d want to push this “Identity” stuff but it’ll only work on those for whom it actually is their foremost identity.  It’s not mine, not by a longshot.  Not any of my cousins’ nor friends’ either.  And there are many more like us.  Someone needs to speak up for us, so I do; happily for you it doesn’t compromise your interests either, though some insist on disagreeing.