The deeds of our film-makers “Everything was perfectly quiet at Rorke’s Drift after the column had left, and every officer and man was going about his business as usual. Not a soul suspected that only a dozen miles away the very men that we had said ‘Goodbye’, and ‘Good luck’ to were either dead or standing back-to-back in a last fierce fight with the Zulus. Our garrison consisted of B Company of the 2/24th under Lieutenant Bromhead, and details which brought the total number of us up to 139. Besides these, we had about 300 men of the Natal Native Contingent; but they didn’t count, as they bolted in a body when the fight began. We were all knocking about, and I was making tea for the sick, as I was hospital cook at the time.” So begins the account by Private Henry Hook VC of the Defence of Rorke’s Drift, 22-23 January, 1879. It is the greatest single action of British arms, a not inconsiderable place in history to occupy. This morning, forty-four years after the release of Cy Endfield’s 1964 film Zulu, the Telegraph reported:-
Despite the distortion, Zulu was an honourable enough attempt to make a film in an already cynical, post-colonial age about a brief moment of extraordinary Victorian valour. The script accorded the 4,000 Zulu attackers sufficient respect that Chief Mangosuthu Buthelezi saw fit to appear as the Zulu war-chief Cetehwayo. The writers were comfortable with that. But they were obviously not comfortable with the real-life soldierly virtue of all the defenders. One wonders how they would like to be remembered themselves. Presumeably not as traducers. However, that said, restoration of a reputation besmirched by film people may be a hot ticket in the next few months. Here’s the Telegraph again:-
Tarantino’s reputation as a film-maker is not what it was, and is in some need of restoration itself. But it is perhaps more likely that he will do Germans a favour with his “modern, in-your-face” historical portrayal of the bastard state. Reading Tobias Kniebe one can almost - almost - hear the exasperated voice of a people who have finally had enough of perpetual dishonour. I hope to God that turns out to be right, because we need them to break their bonds of psychological slavery, and shame the traducers. It is long past time coming. Every serious history of World War II which I have read has been at pains to recognise the immense achievements of the Wehrmacht. I will not shirk from saying that Lebensraum was violently wrong, and had to be opposed by the Western powers. But that is a separate matter from the acknowledgement of German valour in the field. Their military reputation should be no less high than that of the cunning Boers with their smokeless Mausers or the Red Army sacrificing itself for Stalingrad. That of the one hundred and thirty nine men of the British Army at Rorke’s Drift, however, is something else. I will finish by returning to Private Hook’s account of the struggle so that, for MR readers at least, the film-makers cavalier treatment of the facts can be properly dismissed:- “At a stroke, the defending force had been reduced by more than half to 150 men, of which only the 96 of B Company could be considered a cohesive unit, and 35 of whom were hospitalized {only about 9 of which couldn't defend themselves}. Chard immediately realised the need to shorten the perimeter, and gave orders for a new line bisecting the post to be constructed, with the hospital being evacuated. As the natives disappeared, Private Fredrick Hitch, posted as lookout atop the storehouse, reported a Zulu column of four to six thousand approaching. Almost immediately after the Zulu vanguard, 600 men of the iNdluyengwe appeared from behind Oscarberg and attacked the south wall which joined the hospital and the storehouse. In what is the best-known phrase from the battle, one of the defenders yelled “Here they come, as thick as grass and as black as thunder!” “Immediately, a heavy volley of gunfire was opened up at 500 yards, and while at first ragged, the British fire soon steadied, piling up the Zulu dead. The majority of the attacking force swept around the wall, while a few took cover, from where they were either pinned by continuing British fire or retreated to the terraces of Oscarberg, where they began a harassing fire of their own. As this occurred, a large force swept onto the hospital and northwest wall, and those on the barricades - including Dalton and Bromhead - were soon engaged in fierce hand to hand fighting. The British wall was too high for the Zulus to scale, so they resorted to crouching under the wall, trying to get hold of the defenders’ rifles, slashing at British soldiers with assegai or firing their weapons through the wall. At places, they clambered over each others’ bodies to drive the British off the walls, but a “peculiar aversion to the bayonet” defeated these breaches. “Zulu fire, both from those under the wall and around Oscarberg, began to find its mark. Corporal Schiess was shot in the leg, and then lost his hat to a Zulu shot; Commissary Dalton, leaning over the parapet to shoot a Zulu, was wounded in the shoulder by a bullet and dragged out of the line to have his wound dressed; Keefe, ‘B’ Company’s drummer, suffered a skin wound to the head; Corporal Scammell, of the NNC, was shot in the back, and Private Byrne, attempting to help him, was killed by a shot to the head, as was ‘Old King’ Cole, another private in ‘B’ Company {see below at hospital section}. The fire from the mountain only grew worse; Privates Scanlon, Fagan and Chick were slain. At least 1/3 {five} of the 17 killed/died of wounds were killed at the Front wall. “It became clear to Chard that the front wall, under almost constant Zulu attack, could not be held, and at 6 o’clock Chard pulled his men back into the yard, abandoning the front two rooms of the hospital in the process. The hospital was becoming untenable; the loopholes had become a liability, as rifles poked through were grabbed at by the Zulus - but if the holes were left empty the enterprising warriors stuck their own weapons through to fire into the rooms. Among the soldiers assigned to the Hospital were the following: Corporal William Wilson Allen; Pvts: Cole; Dunbar; Frederick Hitch; Horrigan; John Williams; Joseph Williams; Alfred Henry Hook; Robert Jones; William Jones “As it became clear that the front of the building was being abandoned, John Williams began to hack his way through the wall dividing the central room and the back of the hospital. As he made a passable hole the door into the central room came under furious attack from the Zulus, and Williams only had time to drag two bedridden patients out before the door gave way, pitting Joseph Williams against the Zulus. Williams managed to kill several before being overwhelmed. The remaining men in the room, Private Horrigan, Adams, and two more patients, were stabbed to death by the rampaging Zulus. Williams then dragged his patients into one of the corner rooms, where he linked up with Private Hook and another nine patients. “The previous scene was played out again; Williams hacked at the wall to the next room with his pick-axe, as Hook held off the Zulus. A firefight erupted as the Zulus fired through the door and Hook returned the compliment - but not without a bullet smashing into his helmet and stunning him. Williams made the hole big enough to get into the next room, occupied only by Private Waters, and dragged the patients through. The last man out was Hook, who killed the Zulus who had knocked down the door before diving through the hole. Williams once again went to work, spurred by the knowledge that the roof was now on fire, as Hook defended the hole and Waters continued to fire through the loophole. After fifty minutes, the hole was large enough to drag the patients through, and the men - save Private Waters and Beckett, who hid in the wardrobe - were in the last room, being defended by a pair of privates going by the name Jones. {Waters was wounded and Beckett died of assegai wounds}. From here, the patients clambered out a window and then ran across the yard to the barricade. Of the eleven patients, nine survived the trip, as did all the able-bodied men. According to James Henry Reynolds only 4 men were killed in the Hospital: one was a Native with a broken leg who couldn’t be moved; Sgt Maxfield and Private Jenkins who were ill with fever and refused to be moved; and a Private Adams who also refused to move. A Private Cole assigned to the hospital was killed when he ran outside. Private Joseph Williams reportably held a small window at the far end of the Hospital and 14 dead Zulus were found later benneth the window; Williams with Private John Williams {above} and two patients tried to hold a hospital entrance with bayonets; but the entrance was forced and Joseph Williams was seized; dragged outside and stabbed with assegais. Reportedly, Jenkins was also killed after being seized and stabbed; another Hospital patient killed was Trooper Hunter of the Natal Mounted Police. Among the hospital patients who escaped were a Corporal Mayer of the N.N.C; Bombadier Lewis of the Royal Artillery and Trooper Green of the Natal Mounted Police who was wounded in the thigh by a spent bullet. A Private Conley with a broken leg was pulled to safety by Hook-although Conley’s leg was broken again}. “The evacuation of the hospital completed the shortening of the perimeter. As night fell, the Zulu attacks grew stronger as the snipers on Oscarberg - now devoid of targets - joined the attack. The cattle kraal came under renewed assault and was evacuated by ten o’clock, leaving the remaining men in a small bastion around the storehouse. “Throughout the night, the Zulus kept up a constant assault against the British positions; Zulu attacks only began to slacken after midnight, and finally ended by two o’clock, instead being replaced by a constant harassing fire from the Zulu firearms and assegai - a fire that in turn only ended at four o’clock. Chard’s force had lost fifteen dead, eight more - including Dalton - seriously wounded, and virtually every man had some kind of minor wound. They were all exhausted, having fought for the better part of ten hours, and were running low on ammunition as well. Of 20,000 rounds in reserve at the mission, only 900 remained. “As dawn broke, the British could see that the Zulus were gone; all that remained were the vast piles of dead - over 370 bodies were counted. Patrols were dispatched to scout the battlefield, recover rifles, and look for survivors. At roughly 7am, an impi of Zulus suddenly appeared, and the weary redcoats manned their positions once again. But no attack materialized. The Zulus were utterly spent, having been on the move for six days prior to the battle and having not eaten properly for two. In their ranks were hundreds of wounded, and they were several days march from any supplies. Soon after their appearance, the Zulus left the way they had come. “Around 8am, another force appeared, and the redcoats abandoned their makeshift breakfast of rum, tea and biscuits to man their positions once again. This was no Zulu force, however; the vanguard of Lord Chelmsford’s relief column had arrived.” Comments:2
Posted by Lurker on Sat, 16 Aug 2008 06:29 | # I dont think Michael Caine is Jewish though. I suppose his actual name sounds kind of Jewish but Im pretty sure the Micklewhite name is of Yorkshire origin. In fact Ive just been having a look around and found this: http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.c/qx/Micklewhite-coat-arms.htm Or here for another example of the name: http://www.nathanielspens.com/pafg02.htm#98 Another link: http://www.familyhistoryonline.net/name/WRY/mcmerriman.shtml So not Jewish, but he knows who pays his wages. 3
Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:30 | # GW, when you say “our’, I take you to mean White and not necessarily British, as Zulu’s director, Cy Endfield, was an American who only fetched up in UK to work as he had been blacklisted from US film work for ‘un-American activities’. 5
Posted by WLindsayWheeler on Sun, 17 Aug 2008 01:12 | # The movie “Zulu” is one of my all time favorites. I don’t tire of watching it. It does have its “anti-war” moment at the end, but overall the movie is great. It does show the virtue of the British soldier and the odds he faced on that day. The defense of Rorke’s Drift has to stand right there with Thermopylae as one of the greatest soldiering feats ever. 6
Posted by Bloke on Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:30 | # You do write a good blog Guessedworker. I spotted both the Zulu and the Tarantino articles this week and both were thought provoking. I have seen Zulu a number of times and when old enough to consider such questions, each time wondered how a cockney ended up in a regiment of South Wales Borderers, whilst at the same time being irritated that cockerneys (although I am not one myself) are so often portrayed as criminals and low lifes - it occurs to me as a manifestation of class hatred When I read the Tarantino article I felt a mild disgust. I think ‘torture porn’ is the phrase used to describe his latest film. I understand even the latest Batman film has OTT grim sadistic scenes in it - and this is supposed to be a kids film! Funny enough, the thought did occur to me when reading about the Tarantino film that perhaps torture porn is an inevitable product of liberalism and perhaps Guessedworker is right in that Liberalism is the root cause of so much that is wrong with our civilisation. I don’t come to this site every day, so perhaps you should give yourself a pat on the back. Also, with regard to the Tarantino film, I was brought up on my mum and dad’s war stories. My mum and dad were young teenagers in the Blitz. My dad very nearly died as a result of an air raid related injury and later on in the war my mum narrowly escaped death on 2 occasions from V1 rockets. By 1944 my dad was in the army. Although most of my dad’s stories were humourous and of the Spike Milligan (Adolf Hitler, my part in his downfall) variety, I found some of them deeply moving and full of compassion, even though they were told in a matter of fact way - his generation were not given to emoting. I could summarise their stories in the following way: first they feared the Germans, then they respected them, then they felt sorry for them. I cannot recall a single occasion when they showed or demonstrated any sort of hatred toward them. Their attitude toward the Germans seemed to reflect Orwell’s line which goes something like “as I write this, highly civilised men are flying overhead trying to kill me”. I have met many British people who have no or little family connection to WWII who have expressed almost vicsceral hatred of Germans, who, when further questioned on this, reveal that it comes from some comic book like view of what happened thanks in part to some silly hollywood portrayal. One woman I had known for many years said she would never forgive the Germans after having seen Schindlers list. Another pair of idiots (who, unfortunately, I am related to through my wife and so can’t get away from them) also said the same thing for the same reason whilst they would gush about how wonderful the Japanese people are. My dad never slagged off the Germans but would almost foam at the mouth with fury at the mention of Japanese behaviour in WWII - even though he wasn’t in that theatre. My dad’s elder brother spent most of WWII in a German POW camp after being captured in 1941. The last time I saw him he said “I have no complaints”. “We didn’t have much to eat but neither did the Germans”. “We got on well with the German guards”. “Never believe anything you see in the films. It wasn’t like that at all”. When he got back to London after the war, he found that each one of his 5 mates who he had hung around with before the war had been killed or was missing in various parts of the globe. Each of them having served in various arms of the services or the merchant navy. The Tarantino film both disgusts and worries me. I live in a country where anti-racists routinely call anyone and everyone demonstrating the slightest dissent from the multiculti-happy-clappy viewpoint a ‘Nazi’. The Tarantino film seems to suggest that its just fine and dandy to torture and murder ‘Nazis’. 7
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:57 | # Bloke, after reading your comment, all I can say is if you ran for prime minister and I were a Brit I’d vote for you and you alone, no questions. Thanks for posting that, comrade! 8
Posted by me on Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:56 | # zulu is a great film but not only is the henry hook part wrong - but the drunken minister as well - there were two ministers and both served with valor as lookouts enough to earn a citation…they were the “muscular ” christianity types of the victorian era - Chinese Gordon, Colonel Napier (in my country we have a custom when men burn women alive, we hang them - in response to a brahim protest over banning sati) but if you look at the ethnicity of the screenwriter the depiction of the minister as drunk is no suprise… 9
Posted by Guest on Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:36 | # Lurker thanks for the information. 10
Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:03 | # “The Tarantino film seems to suggest that its just fine and dandy to torture and murder ‘Nazis’.” -Bloke Why not? The Allies did. Often times using Jewish torture masters. The Bolsheviks ‘sub-contracted’ their torture chambers to the Jews too. In IsraHell the Jews take out their vengeance on Palestinian children: administering mass beatings of children to the point of broken bones and maiming. What is it about Jews and torture? 11
Posted by Bloke on Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:24 | # Well thanks for that Fred, although expect you’re kidding. Being PM or just an MP brings a great pension and it seems mysterious ways to enrich yourself, so if anyone’s offering, I’m up for it. It was just a bit of a rant really. I just strongly object to the hollywoodization of our history and am bewildered that people are taken in by Speilberg type bollocks. The way I see it, our history is kind of sacred and to turn it into some sort of cartoon crap is to disrespect the people who were there, many of whom are still alive. I know Tarantino’s film is supposed to be about Americans, but to make out all Germans were heel clicking goose stepping Nazis, who were hated, and deserve to be hated and who deserved to be tortured, well that just isn’t the way they were described to me. But I am sure it isn’t just me, when I think of the WWII films I remember and liked from when I was a kid, like Battle of Britain or Ice Cold in Alex, the Germans characters were not portrayed particularly sympathetically but they weren’t given the Speilberg treatment either. What pisses me off seems to be a fairly recent thing. I dread to think how I would feel if I had a German doppleganger. I’m not a student of the history of WWII although I expect I know more than the average Brit, but in my view, the best history is the history you get from the people who were actually there. And, the stories I heard stand in sharp contrast to the hateful bullshit that pours out of Hollywood. I suppose some sort of values were imparted to me with the stories I’ve been told, vague values perhaps, but powerful stuff, like chivalry, honour, and morality and ethics in the most trying circumstances imaginable. I guess that why this and my first post are so verbose, its that I am struggling to describe and defend things which to me are bordering on the metaphysical, which aresholes like Tarantino piss all over. Don’t misunderstand me, I don’t buy into WWII being a just war, if anything I’m inclined to agree with Pat Buchannan in that we’d have been a lot better off if we’d stayed out of it. But when I think of what the people who were in it went through, perhaps the ultimate test, the kind of test of metal that could happen in any war, although they don’t come much bigger than WWII, it infuriates me to see it turned into a cartoon. Aside from all that, in my view, torture porn is so sick, disgusting and low, there really must be something seriously wrong with a society that is able to make and market such a thing. 12
Posted by Bloke on Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:18 | # Oh and one last thing Fred, before I go to bed. I’m assuming (although I might be wrong) the ‘comrade’ thing was in response to my ‘class hatred’ comment. I don’t mind, if that is the case, its funny, and I appreciate that saying something like ‘class hatred’ would stick out like a sore thumb on a forum such as MR - it would go down better elsewhere. I wasn’t thinking of my audience. It would be more accurate to say class, race, gender and sexuality hatred, since this hatred is only directed at white working class heterosexual males here in the UK. In my experience, the biggest class haters, in this sense, in the UK, are Guardianistas. But I get the impression that blue states Americans feel the same way about their compatriots from the Appalachians and elsewhere. I get the impression that the kind of Americans described in the blog ‘stuff white people like’ hate with a passion the ‘crackers’ who are filling the body bags from Iraq and Afghanistan. I met an American doctor once who had worked in both West Virginia and the Valleys of South Wales. She said she was was struck by the similarities in culture or something. The United States is a very foreign country to the UK, but in many ways its also amazingly similar. Post a comment:
Next entry: What did Howard Dean mean?
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) Computer say no by Guessedworker on Thursday, 09 May 2024 15:17. (View) |
Posted by Guest on Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:19 | #
During the filming of ZULU, Maurice Joseph Micklewhite, Jr., aka Michael Caine vowed never to return to South Africa as long as Whites ruled it. He only returned after the ANC regime was in power.
Midklewhite is married to an Indian and is typical of his tribe.
How hungry we are for ANYTHING resembling a movie of our history where our people are the heroes that we revere this and even the late Humphrey Ireland aka Wilmot Robertson would stage viewings of ZULU.
Good Lord has this mighty race fallen.
It surprises me that it is still available for purchase, nevertheless.