Frontex Needs You! And a 4th generation EU as well? While E.U. skepticism is more than valid in terms of its extant structure, operation, backing and representatives, can there be any doubt that European nations are better off coordinating their efforts if not cooperating with regard to their mutual interests and concerns? That unity of effort is what we are calling a union, a European Union of sorts. Let this crisis shake trust in authority to its core and provide an opportunity for ethnonationalists. For we are operating of virtual, parallel nations (4th generation warfare). With that, we can seize this crisis to begin to determine the means and extent of our cooperation in a sovereign reconstruction of our national rule structures and their coordination - but again, who can argue that we have common interest in turning would-be non-European migrants away and repatriating a large percentage of the ones that are here? Not only are we better off aligned against migrants as opposed to each other, but also aligned against those who are responsible for the pejorative rule structures as they presently exist and the implementation of those rules which brings invading migrants here. There can be little dispute that European nations are better off with less conflict with one another and more aligned against non-European antagonists and European traitors. The obvious fact of our allied interests accepted, attention then turns to a balance to be struck somewhere between cooperation and coordination. With these ideas and the idea of sharing the reconstruction of our rules in our service we have an amazing opportunity to learn from the mistakes of World War II and do things correctly this time. That is, unlike World War II, where we were fighting one another European Nations, we have an opportunity to do what should have been done then: respect one another ethno-nationalist sovereignties and coordinate the blockage, deportation and repatriation of non-Europeans and disproportionate non-native nationals. This will require something like Frontex. The question is, how much cooperation or coordination do Europeans want to negotiate?
This concluding part of Guillaume Faye’s article [The Migratory Invasion, Part 1: A Terrifying Diagnosis] hits upon the matter critically:
The matter is, if cooperation and coordination among European nations is necessary - and as we have said, of course it is, more or less - how are the blue prints of that (more or less) unionization to be redrawn and its manifest “architecture” to “function” and be managed? Theoretically, “more” is characterized by more “cooperation” as distinguished from “less” which is characterized more like “coordination”, but it is still a necessary unionized effort to some extent. More, coordination has more to do with non-interference with fellow ethnonationalists and acting without centralized directive, but rather autonomously and at the discretion of the parallel nation. It will do no good to say that no level of cooperation or coordination is necessary as European nations will be impacted by what happens in other European nations. Comments:2
Posted by 200 migrants storm Spain's border on Sat, 26 Dec 2015 09:26 | #
3
Posted by Italy braces for 10,000 invaders per week on Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:20 | #
4
Posted by Frontex is overwhelmed on Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:24 | #
5
Posted by European Border & Coast Gaurd Agency on Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:34 | # European Border and Coast Guard Agency launches - incorporates “Frontex” Post a comment:
Next entry: All the US-trained rebels in Syria either died or deserted.
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Fully Enforced Border of EU proposed on Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:44 | #