Category: Race realism

A Very Bad Wizard: Morality Behind The Curtain.

In my review of the book Strange Fruit, I said I would expand on the question about whether any moral/ethical system can be justified, with reference to the book A Very Bad Wizard by Tamler Sommers, 2009. Sommers interviews nine scholars on the subject of morality and ethics. Following are excerpts showing how evolutionary psychology undermines any justification for a universal moral doctrine.

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Monday, December 28, 2009 at 04:01 PM in Race realism
Comments (1) | Tell-a-Friend

Then and now, and the short distance between

by The Narrator

The following text was written by Thomas Jefferson two centuries ago. The subject: blacks. His observations and conclusions look surprisingly fresh and modern in both the good and bad sense.

For example the first president of the Banana Republic of North America comes to mind when Jefferson states:

They astonish you with strokes of the most sublime oratory....But never yet could I find that a black had uttered a thought above the level of plain narration….He is often happy in the turn of his compliments, and his style is easy and familiar, except when he affects a Shandean fabrication of words. But his imagination is wild and extravagant, escapes incessantly from every restraint of reason and taste, and, in the course of its vagaries, leaves a tract of thought as incoherent and eccentric, as is the course of a meteor through the sky. His subjects should often have led him to a process of sober reasoning: yet we find him always substituting sentiment for demonstration.

The existence of rap and hip-hop seems quite natural, as centuries ago it is observed that blacks:

In music…are more generally gifted than the whites with accurate ears for tune and time, and they have been found capable of imagining a small catch. Whether they will be equal to the composition of a more extensive run of melody, or of complicated harmony, is yet to be proved.

Indeed the verdict is still out.

His most profound observation on them, though, is at the heart of why any kind of social/political/religious agreement or mutual understanding with them is impossible. He writes of them:

They are more ardent after their female: but love seems with them to be more an eager desire, than a tender delicate mixture of sentiment and sensation. Their griefs are transient. Those numberless afflictions, which render it doubtful whether heaven has given life to us in mercy or in wrath, are less felt, and sooner forgotten with them. In general, their existence appears to participate more of sensation than reflection.

Most interesting of all though is Jefferson’s seeming moments of slipping into sentimental leftism that seems a habit of some Whites. For example, of black crime he writes (the very modern looking apologetic):

That disposition to theft with which they have been branded, must be ascribed to their situation, and not to any depravity of the moral sense.

Of course, as their situation has changed much over the past two hundred years while their proclivity towards crime remained unabated, we can see the faulty conclusion of Jefferson’s appraisal. It’s his motivation for writing such that is of interest, though.

In his concluding sentence we can see the all too familiar appeal to religion and a murky notion of “social justice” as Jefferson writes:

The spirit of the master is abating, that of the slave rising from the dust, his condition mollifying, the way I hope preparing, under the auspices of heaven, for a total emancipation, and that this is disposed, in the order of events, to be with the consent of the masters, rather than by their extirpation.

Naturally that can also be read as a warning. Still it’s interesting to see Jefferson do what so many in our own time do in coming to a natural conclusion on the obvious differences in the races, yet flirting with the idea that he wishes it were not so and that it will one day, miraculously, go away.

Like so many Whites of modern North America, Thomas Jefferson makes reasonable deductions based on an abundance of study and observations on the undeniable and profound fact of the multitude of differences in the races, yet still wishes to imagine that it will all resolve itself in some egalitarian utopia at some unspecified future date under some mysterious bit of magical circumstance.

The text is interesting not in so much as it represents a mirror image of our thoughts as modern White Americans, but as more of an old home movie of how those thoughts used to look.

Here it is in full.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Thursday, May 21, 2009 at 01:45 PM in Race realism
Comments (15) | Tell-a-Friend

Physiognomy and Liking: My Experience

by Happy Cracker

Why is it that the glimpse of a related physiognomy opens so innocently the floodgates of affection? Why is so much of our ‘liking’ dependent on the face of the person we interact with?

I had a chance to ponder this last month, as I filled a temporary position working for a catering company, and interacting with several thousand party guests - each of whom I had to greet, make small talk with, answer their questions and hand them off to be seated. I myself was determined - regardless of the type of person I was interacting with - to be a non-stop fountain of charm. I did my best to smile as wide, and think as warmly of the other person as possible. This is a technique I’ve learned to convey the most positive image to the other person: think about them as warmly as possible. And although I am committed to the 14 words and the existence of my people, I don’t think giving lukewarm receptions to wogs is going to advance the white cause. So I did everything possible to beam charm at everything that came before my eyes. I looked into thousands of faces, always the same eye contact, and performed the same motions thousands of times.

What I discovered is that physiognomy reigns over us - pre-determining the trajectory of our interactions far more than we would like. There are secret stores of human affection whose access is restricted based on physiognomy - and these secret stores don’t represent gifts which one is conscious of, and thus eager to distribute fairly, but primordial feelings of liking, which spring up innocently from within us and are beyond conscious control. They are thus hard to quantify - it is even hard for people to recognize the subtle influence these feelings have on their dealings with others, in the case of people with limited introspection.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 at 08:25 AM in Race realism
Comments (64) | Tell-a-Friend

The Accusation of Racism

The Accusation of Racism

By Robert Reis

“Race” has been part of the English vocabulary since 1580. 

It applies to a division of mankind possessing traits that are transmissible by descent and sufficient to characterize it as a distinct human type.

“Racism” became part of the English vocabulary in 1936.

The 2007 edition of the WordWeb Dictionary defines “racism” as “the prejudice that members of one race are intrinsically superior to members of other races.”

Continued...

Posted by Robert Reis on Thursday, March 5, 2009 at 12:18 PM in Race realism
Comments (27) | Tell-a-Friend

“A Conspiracy of Silence”

“A Conspiracy of Silence”
By
Robert E. Reis

On April 21, 1958, Time Magazine published the last known article to appear in America’s mainstream media stressing the extraordinary high rate of crime in America’s Negro community. [“THE NEGRO CRIME RATE: A FAILURE IN INTEGRATION” [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,810262,00.html]
What did Time Magazine report fifty years ago?

Continued...

Posted by Robert Reis on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 at 04:42 AM in Race realism
Comments (3) | Tell-a-Friend

An Affirmative Action President?

The intelligence of presidential candidates and presidents is the topic of discussion during and after elections. And, it seems that the Left is more enamored with this question than the Right—the same people who deny that intelligence has any real meaning and that if we just got to know people they would all show the same cognitive abilities, but in diverse ways. “We are all equally smart” they will submit.

Along comes Sarah Palin, a nobody, according to the Left, but a popular governor in the eyes of Alaskans. They declare that she is “stupid” because she has not travelled outside of North America, she could not name Supreme Court decisions, and many of her interview questions seemed rehearsed, etc. Are these adequate criteria to formulate how intelligent a person is? I for one read a lot of books where court discussions are discussed, and I will remember the results while forgetting the name of the court decision. Not all intelligent people like travelling, especially those perhaps who enjoy outdoor sports. And of course she has had to be coached; her focus over the last two years has been on Alaskan issues, far away from the Washington scene. But as I suspect she is in fact quite intelligent, at least intelligent enough to be president where ideology is more important than raw intelligence. After all, she would be surrounded by advisors and experts, and her learning curve would be steep.

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Friday, October 10, 2008 at 11:39 PM in Race realism
Comments (34) | Tell-a-Friend

Silent Racism: How Well-Meaning People Perpetuate the Racial Divide, by Barbara Trepagnier, 2006.

There are two factions that try to explain racial inequality: the equalitarians that deny any differences in the essence of different population groups such as average intelligence, conscientiousness, forethought, etc. and the Jensenist faction that studies heredity, twin studies, correlations between wealth and intelligence, etc. One is anecdotal and non-theoretical without any program to in fact test or try and disprove the theory—they are primarily dialogs about accepted oppression. The psychometricians however are grounded in statistical analysis; developing theories that rely on methodologies that can be disproven or verified based on observable outcomes and collected data. The two are worlds apart in applying the scientific method of narratives versus scientific empiricism.

Trepagnier, with “feminism, racism, and postmodernism” shaping her thinking, writes, “My goal in writing this book is to encourage well-meaning white people to reconsider their ideas about racism. The title, Silent Racism: How Well-Meaning White People Perpetuate the Racial Divide, suggests that concerned whites are implicated in racial problems, including the disparity between blacks and whites. The title also introduces the term silent racism, which raises the question: Why talk about silent racism? After all, if it is silent, how could it possibly matter? [T]he racist thoughts, images, and assumptions in the minds of white people, including those that by most accounts are ‘not racist’—is dangerous precisely because it is perceived as harmless. The silent racism in people’s thoughts, images, and assumptions shapes their perspective of reality. And a perspective that is shaped by racist thoughts, images, and assumptions—no matter how subtle they are—will produce behavior that reflects racist thoughts, images, and assumptions.”

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Thursday, August 21, 2008 at 01:26 AM in Race realism
Comments (13) | Tell-a-Friend

Life in the Kwa

An article not written by me that deserves wide distribution.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3409

Postcard from Zinnlandia
From the desk of Takuan Seiyo on Fri, 2008-07-11 22:37

I am on the MAX Red Line light rail car going from downtown Portland to the Airport. Some things socialists do better. Among them are public transportation, recycling, French poetry readings, yoga, coffee, artisan food and arthouse cinema. Would it that the counterscale were not so much more loaded.

Two hefty women in Birkenstocks and Nordic sweaters sit on the bench in front of me. They are either academics or lesbians or both. Portland is a babe magnet for this kind of babes.

Continued...

Posted by Robert Reis on Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 03:50 AM in Race realism
Comments (133) | Tell-a-Friend

An Honest Conversation About Race.

Linda Chavez wrote an article in the June, 2008 issue of Commentary—the Neocon magazine—entitled Let Us by All Means Have an Honest Conversation about Race. She notes that fewer than 8% of Whites hold negative attitudes about Blacks, while other minorities hold more negative attitudes about Blacks. There is nothing new in this observation—anyone familiar with Kevin MacDonald’s work knows that Whites are the least ethnocentric, but also we know how to behave and be agreeable. Whites are subject to negative implicit attitudes but not explicit attitudes where we are more likely to conform to the diversity/multiculturalism/naïve environmentalism with regards to race.

Again, she points out that non-Whites have higher levels of tension between them than is present between Whites and other races. In fact, “a plurality of blacks would rather do business with whites than with either Hispanics or Asians.” (the poll conveniently left out Jews.) And later, “As against the 10 percent or fewer of American whites who hold negative views of blacks, the same mid-1990’s survey of intergroup attitudes cited above registered over three-quarters of blacks holding negative views of whites.” And yet she notes that Blacks would rather do business with Whites than with other minorities.

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Saturday, June 21, 2008 at 02:26 PM in Race realism
Comments (9) | Tell-a-Friend

Freetown Massacre of the RUF

Warfare as waged by Sub-Saharan Africans is significantly more chaotic and excessively brutal than that which was known historically in Europe. In order to get a taste for what African warfare entails, I catalogued some passages from a 1999 Human Rights Watch report on the RUF’s massacre in Sierra Leone.

Some of the readership will wonder what connection this has to political theory or our situation in the West.  Well, there are several, but let me suggest just one. We have to cultivate a more coarse, and less squeemish sensibility for all things. We have to be able to look every truth in the face, regardless of whether it’s aesthetically pleasing. This is a lesson in itself, to halt the recoil of aesthetic reflexes and digest the ugliness of the world without flinching and without conceptual cushioning. Don’t draw back into your Victorian or Edwardian citadel - these people now live amongst us. Let us, instead, look at them in an unflattering but not uncharacteristic moment, as they slay each other in their natural habitat.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Sunday, June 17, 2007 at 10:09 AM in Race realism
Comments (4) | Tell-a-Friend

Race in humans: A reply to the “Statement on Race” by the American Anthropological Association (AAA)

This is a discussion section for the race FAQ at the wiki, which presently doesn't discuss all the things that it should, but it will be periodically updated. Suggestions for improvement and criticism will be appreciated. If you offer criticism, stick to scientific issues, and you better have the requistive scientific background.

Posted by J Richards on Friday, June 15, 2007 at 05:57 PM in Anthropology,  Genetics & Human Bio-Diversity,  Race realism
Comments (49) | Tell-a-Friend

Not in our Genes?

In 1984, Lewontin, Rose and Kamin wrote Not In Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature. I decided to read the book to see how the arguments fared after 23 years of additional research, argument and debate. As it turned out, even for 1984, the arguments against at that time primarily sociobiology were very weak by the authors own admission. That is they don’t argue against genetic influences and racial differences so much as against science itself.

They start out: “Each of us has been engaged for much of this time in research, writing, speaking, teaching, and public political activity in opposition to the oppressive forms in which determinist ideology manifests itself. We share a commitment to the prospect of the creation of a more socially just—a socialist—society. And we recognize that a critical science is an integral part of the struggle to create that society, just as we also believe that the social function of much of today’s science is to hinder the creation of that society by acting to preserve the interests of the dominant class, gender, and race. This belief—in the possibility of a critical and liberatory science—is why we have each in our separate ways and to varying degrees been involved in the development of what has become known over the 1970s and 1980s, in the United States and Britain, as the radical science movement.”

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Thursday, May 24, 2007 at 01:18 AM in Race realism
Comments (20) | Tell-a-Friend

The Mendacity of the Realist

Realist at Inverted World now has a piece about David Duke.  I was disappointed to see this, because per Realist’s comments in his first column I was led to believe he’d be outlining his censorship policies and hoping to get to poke fun at them.  I’ll have to settle for a less interesting subject to poke fun at.

On a personal level I like Realist, he seems a good sort.  That said, he seems to be out to lunch when it comes to logically supporting a position.  The piece is basically a string of fallacies designed to discredit David Duke, and by extension, White Nationalism.

First he reminds the reader of why he created IV - because Amren wasn’t quite philo-Semitic enough for his tastes.  Sure, Amren heavily censors the topic in moderating comments, but the occasional tepid criticism of non-Arab Semites was allowed through to sully the constant philo-Semitism and finally it became too much to bear.  To make matters worse, Jared Taylor didn’t excommunicate Duke for his heresy at the last Amren conference.

Then Realist states his thesis:

Here I will spell out clearly why I think the racial right in America is fundamentally insane.

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 at 08:19 PM in Race realism,  That Question Again,  White Nationalism
Comments (95) | Tell-a-Friend

Please suh, not the briar patch!

Via Amren:
Clinton-Obama Ticket Stirs Fear in GOP

The possibility that a potential Democratic presidential primary matchup between Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama could lead to a Clinton-Obama ticket is raising concerns in GOP circles that it might be unbeatable.

Hahahahaha!

They’ve got to be kidding.  Is it just me?  Or, is it obvious that Obama as VP would guarantee a Republican victory?

Couple of thoughts:

1) as a Stormfronter pointed out, Obama may be getting all the hype precisely because he’ll make an excellent punching bag for Hillary down the road.
2) Obama is nobody.  His only qualification is that he’s a sambo (or maybe a mulatto).
3) The Republicans probably know all this and this is their B’rer Rabbit routine.
4) The Democrats probably know all this and maybe this is some tactic that isn’t obvious to me.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Thursday, December 14, 2006 at 11:48 PM in Political analysis,  Race realism
Tell-a-Friend

The Inverted World

A post at Stormfront by Realist from Inverted World has piqued my interest:

I am the Realist, who set up this website. Unlike American Renaissance, I would publish an article critical of Jewish influence on white societies provided it was intellectually defensible. “Intellectually defensible” means that the article would not contain unfounded slanders against Jews. Furthermore, any article that I published would have to concede that much of the commentary about Jews in the white nationalist community, including the whole of Holocaust denial, is sick and evil.

Lawrence Auster’s article ”Why Jews Welcome Muslims” is an example of the sort of thing I would be glad to publish. Another is this entry on Auster’s blog View from the Right.

Auster has spelled out the differences between responsible and irresponsible criticism of Jews here.

Putting aside the not-so-rigorous question of why Auster (an ethnic non-Arabic Semite) has produced all Realist’s examples of acceptable criticism of non-Arabic Semites, I wondered why all such criticism must contain the disclaimer about sick and evil WNism, and invited Realist to stop by MR and comment.  I’m genuinely interested in hearing what he has to say.

He cites Auster as having spelled out the differences between responsible and irresponsible criticism of Jews, so let’s take a look at Auster’s piece (again).

Update: Auster responded (see below).

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 at 11:44 PM in Race realism,  That Question Again,  White Nationalism
Comments (141) | Tell-a-Friend

The Thin Edge of the Wedge

Now THIS is an interesting topic.  I’ve thought before about how racial reality impacts the demographics of fighter pilots in America, but I hadn’t even considered what a wonderful petri dish SA will no doubt represent as it forces “diversity” on itself.

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, November 22, 2006 at 04:03 AM in Race realism
Comments (9) | Tell-a-Friend

Old anti-racists just bloody fade away

Steve Jones, the professional professorial race-denier and friend to snails in and out of the Labour Party, has been guiding the insufficiently universalist Telegraph reader away from harmful thoughts.

Stevie-baby is an interesting case.  All through his career he has exemplified the triumph of leftist politics over scientific integrity.  But as the haplotype blocks relinquish their secrets it is becoming much harder for him to operate.  These days he mostly confines himself to soft targets.

He first came to my attention in the late 1990s when BBC Radio 4’s “Today”, always keen for a bit of white-race baiting, regularly turned to him for expert wiseacreage.  He was just required to mouth a few pieties, condemn racism and genetic determinism and kill off all complaint with a few forbidding words like “chromosome” and “mytochondrial”.  The listening audience, presumably floored, was left to embrace the nearest wonderful human being in any skin colour but white.

It’s strange how memory dances around the detail, but I remember one “Today” interview from the late 1990s involving Jones the Gene and an expert, unusually, from the other side of the argument.  The subject was the then-imminent effort to crack the human genome.  I heard the broadcast while on the return leg of the morning school run.  I can remember being caught in traffic in Seaford at the time - not an intellectually stimulating environment.  But I was certainly stimulated when Our Steve’s opponent, whose name I do not recall, caught him cold with a straight right, “The race debate is over,” he said, “Our side is proved to have been right all along.”

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, November 21, 2006 at 05:45 PM in Race realism
Trackbacks (0) | Comments (14) | Tell-a-Friend

Another state, Michigan, has banned affirmative action.

Jennifer Gratz sued the University of Michigan in 1997 for discrimination because she could not attend the university, because preferences were given to minorities. In 2003 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case that satisfied no one. The university could take race into consideration for the purpose of diversity but could not use rigid formulas to do so.

Since then, Gratz has been active lecturing on the unfairness of affirmative action, and now the public voted for Proposal 2 on November 7. It will amend the State Constitution to “outlaw consideration of race and gender in deciding which applicants get into college, who receives government jobs and what businesses secure state and local contracts.”

Now passed, Michigan will join California and Washington where similar measures passed. Ward Connerly, who helped pass the California initiative, plans to take the initiative to other states now that Michigan has joined. Not surprisingly, “Virtually every religious, political, business and civic organization in Michigan opposes the measure,” as well as both gubernatorial candidates. (Article from the Chicago Tribune, 10/19/2006.)

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Friday, November 10, 2006 at 12:28 PM in Race realism
Trackbacks (0) | Comments (15) | Tell-a-Friend

Racism would’ve saved her life

STAR’S SUICIDE WAS KILLER COVER-UP

November 7, 2006—In a stunning turnaround, a construction worker yesterday confessed to killing indie actress Adrienne Shelly, whose death in a Greenwich Village apartment last week was first thought to be suicide, cops said.

“I was having a bad day,” illegal immigrant Diego Pillco, 19, allegedly told cops. “I didn’t mean to kill her. But I did kill her.”

[link added]

Fortunately she wasn’t too high-up in the Chosen Classes (only an “indie actress” after all); otherwise too many of the self-chosen might be forced to consider whether “racism” or “xenophobia” or “anti-immigrant hysteria” might’ve saved her life.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Thursday, November 9, 2006 at 02:21 AM in Law & Order,  Race realism
Comments (4) | Tell-a-Friend

Book review of “Breeding between the Lines” by Alon Ziv

This is a book review of “Breeding between the lines: Why interracial people are healthier and more attractive,” by Alon Ziv, 184 pp., Barricade Books, 2006, ISBN: 1569803064. My preliminary impression that the book most likely doesn’t have decent data in it is confirmed.

Continued...

Posted by J Richards on Saturday, October 14, 2006 at 04:06 AM in Anthropology,  Books,  Ethnicity and Ethnic Genetic Interests,  Genetics & Human Bio-Diversity,  IQ and Heredity,  Psychology,  Race realism,  That Question Again
Trackbacks (0) | Comments (268) | Tell-a-Friend

Race realism is just around the corner.

A short article in the Chicago Tribune, 10/5/2006, describes a new initiative to find ways to process the genetic code of individuals. A $10 million prize will be given to the first company that can sequence 100 individuals’ code in 10 days. The money is from the X Prize Foundation, and this initiative is named the Archon X Prize for Genomics.

Experts expect this to take at least five years, but that is a far shorter time than many detractors have predicted for say finding the genes for intelligence. The initiative will allow a person to get individualized medical treatment based on their genetic makeup (pharmacogenetics), but it will also indicate a host of individual vulnerabilities, ailments, personality types, etc.

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Thursday, October 12, 2006 at 10:53 PM in Race realism
Trackbacks (0) | Comments (28) | Tell-a-Friend

Jewish privilege

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1531296,00.html

How important is your racial identity to you? Researchers long thought it wasn’t that crucial to whites. But a groundbreaking new study on whiteness and race relations by University of Minnesota sociologists shows that whites in the U.S. are far more conscious of being white--and the privileges it brings--than was believed.

The survey is packed with fascinating findings, some surprising (a stunning proportion of whites--77%--say their race has a distinct culture that should be preserved)

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, September 6, 2006 at 10:30 PM in Race realism,  White Nationalism
Comments (11) | Tell-a-Friend

Derbyshire: Race and Conservatism

http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm?frm=3891&sec_id=3891

Alas, there is no justice in politics.  Republicans got stuck as the party of racial discrimination.  Since racial discrimination soon came to be seen as the most unspeakable of all evils, and since, from the 1970s on, most conservatives were Republicans, it is not very surprising that conservatives don’t want to talk about race.

I think we should, though.  Our current silence keeps us out of present trouble, I’ll grant; but I believe it stores up future trouble. Let me try to explain.

IEmphasis added)

I think that says it all about Conservatives today, in general.

Conservatism, to me, is the politics of the Cold Eye.  It strives to see human beings as they are, not through a smeared lens of wishful thinking or abstract ideology.

That’s what I thought too, but clearly it isn’t if self-professed Conservatives are to be believed.  By that metric I am a Conservative, but I’d just as soon leave the appellation to the mass that claims it.

In any case, the piece makes for a good read.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Sunday, September 3, 2006 at 11:35 PM in Conservatism,  Race realism
Comments (56) | Tell-a-Friend

Oh for G-d’s sake: insane miscegenation propaganda

Interesting new book out this week

Breeding Between the Lines: Why Interracial People are Healthier and More Attractive

by Alon Ziv

Book Description This book combines sex, race, health and genetics in a daring new theory. Written with accessible, direct prose, anecdotes, analogies, and examples from human and animal studies, it is sure to spark debate in a massive way.

Jay Phelan, Author of Mean Genes: Breeding Between the Lines is that rare book that is insightful and revolutionary, while remaining compulsively readable and downright fun.

Alon Ziv, Alon Ziv, why is that name pinging my Jewdar?

A member of the group least likely to miscegenate (with the world’s highest mean IQ as a direct result) persuades the rest of us to miscegenate in an insightful, revolutionary, readable and downright fun book.

Yay, more jewish psyops.

Addendum by J Richards

Svy, I simply have to add a few things to this entry, and I don’t think you would mind.

Here is the cover of the book by Alon Ziv.

Is the mixed race woman a match for white beauty?

Alon Ziv has to be insane if he believes that the broad-nosed and masculine mixed-race woman looks better.  Can people in their right mind believe that attractive white women can be improved upon if non-whites are absorbed into the white gene pool? 

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 at 01:06 AM in Anthropology,  Ethnicity and Ethnic Genetic Interests,  Genetics & Human Bio-Diversity,  Psychology,  Race realism,  That Question Again
Comments (520) | Tell-a-Friend

Interracial crime is worse than intraracial crime

This will be a short post.  Interracial crime is worse than intraracial crime because interracial crime leads to racism, which is a thought crime and grounds for firing, divorce, ostracization, anti-social behavior, etc.  In other words, interracial crime is worse because it does more damage.

Note: this is a speculative post, and its purpose is QA testing; rip it apart folks.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Friday, August 18, 2006 at 08:20 PM in Law & Order,  Psychology,  Race realism
Comments (5) | Tell-a-Friend