Posted by Franklin Ryckaert on Tue, 02 Jun 2015 19:51 | #

Of Pierce’s five marriages three were with Hungarian women. That is not Slavic, but not Germanic either. Of all his Dissident Voices I can’t remember him saying anything negative about Slavic peoples. His admiration for Hitler didn’t include anti-Slavism as far as I know. I think he belongs to those people who admire the unmistakingly great achievements of Hitler without thinking through what his Lebensraum policy in the East really entailed. The same can be said of Andrew Anglin : great admiration for Hitler, but also sympathy for Slavic peoples and admiration for Putin, without understanding the contradiction.

The only person who combines admiration for Hitler with open hostility to Slavs that I know of is Carolyn Yeager, but she doesn’t call herself a White Nationalist. Real White Nationalism of course can only be pan-European and not narrowly Nordic only.

Posted by DanielS on Tue, 02 Jun 2015 22:25 | #

Hi Franklin, thanks for your response. It is a post particularly in need of feedback.

You may be surprised, but I am grateful for feedback from those disposed to see the good aspects of Hitler’s policies and administration.

Regarding Pierce, I did notice that he was not deliberately anti-Slavic. His last podcast ever was about Katyn. However, his understanding of the history of East Europe was not a strong point.

With Pierce there was a bit more prejudice against Southern Europeans than Easterners, though it was not a very bad prejudice; and as I have said before - I accept it. Accepting prejudice is central to what we’re about.

I tend to like Pierce and I have listened to all of his podcasts.

I love the fact that he takes on popular issues as well; one must appreciate the special perspective he brings to these issues outside of his normal character, such as Hollywood..

The way he reemed Bill Clinton a new one was music to my ears. I hated that man.

Regarding blacks and race mixing, he did address the issue..Hillary Duff, Julia Stiles..

But I like the way it is close to the heart of matters for Rockwell and Ransdell.

Nevertheless, the point that I am trying to make regarding Pierce is not one that I wanted to find but it is one that I have found: The people enamored of Hitler today very typically share a common background of immersion in Pierce’s discussions.

You may have put your finger on the inadvertent cause - That Pierce really believed that Hitler was pretty darn ok to Slavs, and that this blind spot may have been underwritten by his own lack of malice toward Slavs - which he then sold to WN, because he was highly persuasive for the brilliant and powerfully incisive lines that he drew, cutting into our social problems, such that his audience really might not see the problem - glaringly obvious though it is from a perspective not buffered by an insular Internet version of history or a strong alignment with his perspective to begin with - through immersion in vast Germanic demographics circulating “the currency” of its particular view among its own and other non-Slavic peoples.

While problematizing the scientist vs. artist distinction probably does have merit, I would not want to overstate that premise. That is not mainly what I am interested in getting at.

I wanted to get the issue of Pierce, per se, out there to try to get at why people who can’t get over Hitler so often have a common denominator in Pierce.

And that is why I am grateful for your feedback as one who obviously has some insider knowledge.

Posted by Thorn on Wed, 03 Jun 2015 02:40 | #

Pierce’s most notable contribution to WN is his book The Turner Diaries. The content is at best on the level of adolescent. That said, Pierce was an effective pro-white rhetorician ... but his schick only resonates with gullible, uneducated, white youth ... and low IQ adults.

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:23 | #

Although you are not welcome here, I am going to allow this comment in order to address its “point.”

Admirers of Pierce are clearly Not low I.Q.

The same perhaps cannot be said of the Turner Diaries specifically, which I have not read. It was perhaps written condescendingly for its targeted popular audience.

No, the issue with Pierce’s audience is not low I.Q., but more like bad taste.

It is rather like the phenomenon of people who like “heavy metal” music having been shown to have high I.Q.s despite the music being in hideously bad taste - barring some exceptions.

Kant considered aesthetics and judgment kindred. He was probably right about that.

One might apply judgment to that musical genre as well:

Who wouldn’t find this one relaxing after a hard day?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8BfnlWpoa0

Or this one after Church

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNdSXHAu2QQ

Posted by W. Owen Powell on Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:28 | #

Right Wing podcasters mock Rachel Ellen “Haywire” Mendelson with great wit :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1bquctgLZc

see also

RACHEL HAYWIRE IS AN ARSONIST :

http://rachelhaywireisanarsonist.tumblr.com/

“Living Dangerously” is anything but collecting a monthly SSDI welfare check for mental illness, which Ms. “Haywire” has been doing since the age of 18. She likes cocaine, though, so sex work and petty grifter schemes fill out her income. here she is in her own video “RACHEL HAYWIRE : ALL COKED UP AT DAVE AND BUSTERS!” in which she is so fucking CYBERPUNK that she humps a ski ball machine in the name of WIlliam Gibson :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2gQoWXpWRw

She published the address that burned, along with threats. Flyers at the scene were copied from harassment websites she co-created.

Rachel “Haywire” Mendelson is also a well known petty grifter and con artist who has ripped off a large number of people.

documentation is here:

http://joostiz.tumblr.com/

Posted by Millennial Woes on Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:27 | #

Ruth, who has the channel “The Truth Will Live”, is a close friend of mine. She and I speak regularly about the key issues of the alt-right, including the JQ, and she is on-board with all of it. In particular, residing in a Somali-heavy area of the US, she has to deal with their shit just like the rest of us do, and she hates it and opposes immigration from the Third World as wholeheartedly as any of us do.

To repeat, she is a close friend of mine and I know that she is a good, kind, decent person. I think it is wrong of you to besmirch her unless you have some evidence that she is a fake.

PS. And no, she didn’t ask me to write this post! AFAIK she doesn’t even know about this article.

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:46 | #

You miss my point - I have twice now heard her blurring White organizational lines. These are not trivial matters and it is a typical Jewish thing to do to disrupt White organizational abilities.

It is understandable that she would defend herself as a Jew, but the kind of line blurring and term-twisting that she is engaging is not trivial and not incidental - it is a pattern of Jewish obfuscation, deception and disruption which is, and has been, confusing and destructive to White defense.

Jews identify as a people and look after themselves. We have to look after ours.

It is not their prerogative to define our organizational terms.

Nevertheless, this time she and Haywire treat these matters exactly as if it is their prerogative, screwing with terms by not distinguishing a White left from a Jewish inspired, Marxist international Left.

Jews are not alone in failing to make this distinction, but they have been at the forefront of journalese and academic/political twists promoting this confusion, labeling White ethnocentrism “The Right” or “Far Right” as it maintains disorganization and mistrust in our organization, as opposed to a White left, which would be a clear unionization of Whites.

That would not include Jews.

I am not interested in persecuting her.

However, maintaining the theoretical distinctions of White/European identity is critically important - to call attention to these distinctions when they are being confounded is not besmirching.

It is not just her, I have taken issue with Stark, Preston, even KM and many others about the importance of this distinction - That is the important matter for me, not “besmirching” her just because she is a Jew. That would be trivial and pointless.

Posted by writing, elite betrayal and "scabs" on Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:22 | #

A commentator said that “the writing on this site is terrible” and asked me to “please improve the writing.”

I will respond by saying that I am not a writer by trade or choice, but I am rather one who has stepped forward because there were things that were not being said on behalf of Whites that needed to be said and there were things that were said on behalf of Whites that were wrong and needed to be corrected.

Having said that, I will not deny that my writing could be better and it can be particularly bad in early drafts. Not having a proofreader, it is often the case that I do not see mistakes - especially obvious things, e.g., taking for granted that a preposition should be here or there, etc - and I post things up thinking that its ok….sometimes mistakes sit there for days. However, I do tend to catch up with mistakes eventually.

I would like to take a line from “Kenn Daily” wherein he asks his readers to “please report typos”, but I know that our struggle is filled with such fat egos that respectful feedback will never come where ad hominum attack can be interjected or my point can be diverted by petty criticism.

Nevertheless, feedback is feedback and it alerted my attention to the fact that the introductory sentences of this post were in fact (still) written poorly. You might understand that I was going for a little dramatic contrast, with a bit of stodgy writing followed by the “I’m not White I’m Jewish” funk.

Prompted to look at the writing again, I could see that it was grammatically illogical. That being combined with the attempted ironic stodginess added up to a rigid “fail” in that sentence.

Therefore I have re-written it in this way:

This clip (courtesy of Stan Hess) emerges most pertinent in light of Jewish crypsis; along with their twisting and corruption of terms by which we might otherwise organize and understand our people’s interests - as opposed to Jewish influence.

I have also re-written this part - containing some significant information that came up having been instigated through criticism of my “writing:”

Jews do not want us to be a White Left. The reason that they do not want that is because it is our best outlook - an orientation which, together with sufficient anarchy, allows for our coordination and strategic evasion of their infiltration. This capacity to evade their infiltration is facilitated by coordination not merely by place but by language - that is why the terms are so important. Shared terminology serves to coordinate our people wherever they might be while at the same time allowing for sufficient anarchy to evade infiltration, counter our enemies and counter corruption - especially tactical in the clear terminological position of a White Left, its eye on elite betrayal and “scabbing” - i.e., any attempted entry into our “union” by non-Whites.

Posted by "Our purpose" on Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:27 | #

I’ve made some clarifying additions to this section of the post (bolded in this comment)

An artist / pr man is better suited for a view and treatment of Praxis - negotiating the fluid, reflexive, social interactive world with practical judgement as opposed to rigid scientific instrumentation; and laws - “Our purpose is the Creator’s purpose” ?

Of course “our purpose” should be serving the interests of our race. I’m sure Pierce would have believed that, but he may have wanted to base it more absolutely on scientific law than it could be.

Scientists are indispensable of course, for supplying rigorous information on specifics and broad generalities beyond casual purview, providing critical tools for rhetorical support for what is in fact the appropriate, “human-sized” (scaled) social perspective by which the social artist may dramatize and complete a vision.

Posted by Red Ice beams insanity from North Europe on Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:15 | #

                                                     
                      “Here’s another clue for you all, the ‘walrus’ was Paul”
                                 
Red Ice has a nerve billing itself now as “a beacon of sanity from Northern Europe.”

In this episode…

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/06/RIR-150603.php

...Fetzer and Dammegård say that Apollo 11 didn’t go to the moon, that the H is a complete fabrication and Paul McCartney was replaced by a double after his death (following the publicity stunt rumor/joke that Paul was dead, “backed” by clues provided in their music and album photos).

Let’s once again bring-out Buzz Aldrin’s response to moon-walk revisionists:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wptn5RE2I-k

...and a song from Paul regarding these distractions from serious WN concerns:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7A6E0jZRvE

Regarding Holocaustianity, MR does provide a beacon of sanity:

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/majority_radio_dr_christian_lindtner_speaks_to_daniels_and_gw

Posted by W. Owen Powell on Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:50 | #

these Jewish females may be “right wing” but they will NEVER be ... WHITE WING!

Posted by Nationalism the enemy of US policy on Fri, 05 Jun 2015 06:19 | #

Fr. Raphael Johnson has done an excellent job in revealing the fact that the powers that be have been working to destroy nationalism - which would preserve our differences from the masses of humanity.

It has been demonized as the cause of wars. However

- Nationalism does not necessarily lead to wars, imperialism does.

In this article, he describes how Soviet communism was not treated as the enemy by The U.S. It was actually propped-up in crucial ways by U.S. support. “The Red menace of communism” was held up as another bogey, but it was nationalist aspects that the U.S. was most fundamentally against.

I hasten to add that nationalism is not contradictory to the concept of White Leftism being proposed; on the contrary, the two ideas are completely aligned in organic concern.

Our Kind of Enemy

Matthew Raphael Johnson · June 4, 2015
American Capital’s Love Affair with Soviet Communism

Soviet Communism has not been fashionable in elite media and academic circles since 1992. Stalinists are now more often depicted as “conservatives” than leftists, and Communism is seen as a symptom of “nationalism.” A BBC documentary on North Korea declared that country to be a “fascist dictatorship,” on the “right of the political spectrum.” Apparently, if we are to condemn something in the modern world, it must be right-wing.

From a historical perspective, Communism was never really viewed as the enemy by American policymakers. Nationalism was. It has been difficult to discern this, since the true nature and motivations of U.S. policy-making have been shrouded by the myth of the Cold War—the notion that the U.S. and Soviet Union were engaged in an all-or-nothing battle between Freedom and Socialism, with the soul of the world hanging in the balance. In reality, the U.S. and Western Europe invested billions of dollars in the Soviet economy. And at critical times, the USSR was bailed out by cheap grain sales from Archer-Daniels-Midland and other conglomerates.

There was a Cold War of sorts, but it had little to do with “fear of Communism,” which policymakers did not fear nor properly understand. The real antagonism arose when the East sought to create a large, powerful trading bloc outside Western control. Then—and only then—would chatter about “tyranny” and the “Red Menace” be heard. Even in those exceptional times, corporate America continued to invest in “building socialism.”

So it is not entirely surprising to read that President Ford refused to meet with Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, so as not to “prejudice” Brezhnev at a summit held later. Reagan did the same, only meeting with liberal dissidents like Andrei Sakharov. Both Presidents, ostensible “anti-Communists,” were willing to work with Soviets and liberals—but never Russian nationalists.

Read full article at Radix: http://www.radixjournal.com/journal/2015/6/4/our-kind-of-enemy

The bottom line:

When the Cold War got hot, such as during the Vietnam conflict, Washington was never motivated by “anti-Communism” but the fear in the breasts of American business that if China and Russia were to combine forces, the U.S. might become superfluous.

Posted by Joshua Sinistar on Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:23 | #

Hitler had the right idea but he went the wrong way.  You can’t reason with a parasite.  Parasites do not do what they do because they have an outlook or a belief, its merely the instinct of an inferior creature that cannot live by itself.  The jews themselves with their Holocaust mythology are telling you what needs to be done.  Only killing these larcenous perverted worms will ever stop their depredations.  You cannot talk to them or reason with them any more than you can talk to a soulless vampire or a tapeworm living in your intestines.  Only the icy hand of Death will loosen the grip of these monsters from your women and children.  Only an eternal torment in Hell will ever faze the clueless moronic jew who follows the Universes Biggest Liar and runs from the truth.

Posted by Millennial Woes on Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:41 | #

DanielS,

I understand your position, and I do understand the danger. However, I cannot stand by as my close friends are bad-mouthed when they have done nothing wrong whatsoever. (Note that you conflate Ruth’s statements with Rachel Haywire’s, when they are two very different people.)

Though I am grateful to your site for linking to my channel this last year or so, I ask you to remove that hyperlink now. I do not want to be associated with a site, however worthy it might be, that insults and dismisses my own friends.

Thank you,
MW.

Posted by Say goodbye to Hebrew Meme-Weeds on Fri, 05 Jun 2015 18:21 | #

DanielS,

I understand your position, and I do understand the danger. However, I cannot stand by as my close friends are bad-mouthed when they have done nothing wrong whatsoever.

I have explained this. It is not true that they have done nothing wrong whatsoever. On the contrary.

(Note that you conflate Ruth’s statements with Rachel Haywire’s, when they are two very different people.)

I do not conflate their views, and the link to the discussion is provided for anybody who would care to listen and distinguish their opinions.

Furthermore, they were quite in agreement as to the points at issue.

Though I am grateful to your site for linking to my channel this last year or so, I ask you to remove that hyperlink now.

I do not want to be associated with a site, however worthy it might be, that insults and dismisses my own friends.

I do not add or delete the links, but I will ask Lurker to delete the link when he gets a chance. If you are that defensive of these women then we would view your link as a bum steer anyway. 

Thank you,
MW.

I don’t know how Jews say goodbye so, we’ll just leave it at that.

...................

It’s worthwhile to bring back this criticism that I made of “The Truth Will Live” on April 16th, which I called “meme weeds”

Posted by Meme weeds on April 16, 2015, 03:09 AM | #

Jews creating meme weeds

The Truth Will Live is a Blonde Jewish, Neoreactionary, Iconoclast, Youtuber from the Midwest.

  Topics include:

  The Torah Talk Show she co-host with Luke Ford that relates modern day issues to Jewish Religious Texts

She likes to read Radix, the Gottfried (meme weedest) tutored site; the weed of “the left is liberal and universal” being a gnarly old weed that they nastily cling-to.

She also endorses Jared Taylor

In addition to that, in this show Stark (who is guilty of fostering this weed) and “Truth will Live” also create a false middle and extremes regarding White treatment of non-Whites.

“One extreme is to do the Christian services bit, helping Africans to no end. The other is to not care.” She says it is wrong and extreme because they cannot take care of themselves well enough and it is the White man’s burden to help them.

This golden rule is one of the worst and most Jewy impositions on Whites from the Bible. It is crucial that we replace it with the Silver rule.

But unlike the Silver rule, she suggests that people will hate Whites if we leave others alone - “only care about ourselves” -

That is NOT true. The other extreme is to exploit and kill them; for that, they will hate us.

She is apparently projecting the Jewish meaning of “only caring about themselves” onto Whites..

In “a conversation she had with a black friend”, they discussed “how Whites would lose their identifying characteristic if they are not universalists.” ..... ? I guess you have to be black to understand how a system can be self destructive by definition and in perpetuity… or Jewish to try to get people to believe that..

Jewess Alana Mercer was promoting the same bit about this being insurmountable White nature.
.....................

In line with that:

Slattery flattery of Duke: “the left has always been universal”

How can a union be universal? It is exclusionary by definition. You are in the union or you are not. There are people who are in the union and people who are not.

For that matter, how can a union be liberal?

Is it not conservative of member interests?

Posted by Millennial Woes on Sat, 06 Jun 2015 01:26 | #

“One extreme is to do the Christian services bit, helping Africans to no end. The other is to not care.” She says it is wrong and extreme because they cannot take care of themselves well enough and it is the White man’s burden to help them.
This golden rule is one of the most Jewy things imposed on Whites from the Bible.

That’s very strange, because it was I, a non-Jewish, non-religious, British-native white guy, who introduced Ruth to the idea that the White Man’s Burden is a real thing - having arrived at this belief myself without any help, Jewish or otherwise. I came up with it, of my own volition, based on my own observations of my (white, non-Jewish, non-religious) people.

If you are that defensive of these women then we would view your link as a bum steer anyway.

I don’t even know what that phrase means. All I’m asking for is decency. Without a shred of evidence, you are ascribing a calculating, deceitful nature to a woman who simply doesn’t have such a nature. If defending her makes me “defensive”, so be it.

Posted by wage war by deception on Sat, 06 Jun 2015 08:22 | #

Posted by Millennial Woes on June 05, 2015, 08:26 PM | #

  “One extreme is to do the Christian services bit, helping Africans to no end. The other is to not care.” She says it is wrong and extreme because they cannot take care of themselves well enough and it is the White man’s burden to help them.
 
  This golden rule is one of the most Jewy things imposed on Whites from the Bible.

That’s very strange, because it was I, a non-Jewish, non-religious, British-native white guy, who introduced Ruth to the idea that the White Man’s Burden is a real thing - having arrived at this belief myself without any help, Jewish or otherwise. I came up with it, of my own volition, based on my own observations of my (white, non-Jewish, non-religious) people.

You prompted her to an idea that is in circulation from many sources - from pervasive Christianity, a Jewish deception by origin, as a profound example - it is a typical Jewish thing to want to promote the angle of Whites committing suicide (as opposed to Jews having agentive cause in our demise).

She passed-on similarly half baked ideas from a black friend of hers:

In “a conversation she had with a black friend”, she discussed “how Whites would lose their identifying characteristic if they were not universalists.” ..... ?

I guess you have to be black to understand how a system can be self destructive by definition and in perpetuity… or Jewish to try to get people to believe that.

....

If you are that defensive of these women then we would view your link as a bum steer anyway.

“I don’t even know what that phrase means.”

You don’t know how defensive that you are being?

All I’m asking for is decency. Without a shred of evidence, you are ascribing a calculating, deceitful nature to a woman who simply doesn’t have such a nature. If defending her makes me “defensive”, so be it.

What is decent about confusing the terms of our survival as a people?

She may not be fully conscious of lying, but she passed on the lies and deception in these examples by inclination. The reason that she did that by inclination is because she is coming from a different people, with different interests from Whites. 

That is the crucial point made here. The only indecency is to deny us the terms of our survival against patterns of Jewish deception.

It is their way: “wage war by deception” - the motto of the Mossad.

Note:

Comment number 13, above, could be Mossad for all I know..

If the person who wrote that is sincere, it is probably not tactful and the prevailing hypothesis here is that it has been tried time and again and all that winds up happening is selection for the most virulent strains, as they slither away, while the more stationary and accountable Jews take the wrath.

I.e., it has tended to perpetuate the cycle of “horizontal transmission” as Bowery explained.

There is a point to be made, however, that Jews are a group system which acts in its own interest, even if not always acting on “sinister” directives from above.

Posted by uh on Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:06 | #

That’s very strange, because it was I, a non-Jewish, non-religious, British-native white guy, who introduced Ruth to the idea that the White Man’s Burden is a real thing

LOL. I know how you did that!

Posted by uh on Sun, 07 Jun 2015 16:18 | #

and I know that she is a good, kind, decent person.

Betaspeak for “tried but didn’t”.

Posted by W. Owen Powell on Mon, 08 Jun 2015 10:28 | #

Haywire is a pure sociopath, but one of low intelligence.  There is _nothing_ kind, decent or sane about her.  She is a thief and an arsonist and a stalker.

Posted by Flamingreen on Mon, 08 Jun 2015 23:15 | #

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/07/tony-blair-new-job_n_7516180.html

New role for Blair, suppressing free speech:

Tony Blair has a new job campaigning against religious and political extremism in Europe.

A week after he stepped down as Middle East envoy of the Quartet — the United States, United Nations, European Union and Russia — Blair announced he is the new chairman of the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation.

The organization describes itself as “an opinion-making and advisory body.”

It campaigns for all European countries to adopt laws that criminalize Holocaust denial, to create clearer definitions of what constitutes racism and anti-Semitism and to oblige governments to pay for security at synagogues and Jewish schools.

The council was founded in 2007 by Russian-born Jewish businessman Moshe Kantor, now its president.

Blair, who was prime minister from 1997-2007, replaces a former Polish president as chairman of a board that also includes Jose Maria Aznar, the former Spanish prime minister.

Blair will not be paid personally for his new role, but his faith foundation will receive an annual donation; his office refused to disclose the amount. Kantor’s net worth is about $2.4 billion, according to Forbes.

In a joint article published June 4 in The Times of London, Blair and Kantor said ECTR wants to reach thousands of students across Europe over the next two years, working for racial and religious tolerance.

They said: “It is our firm belief that it is not religion or faith that causes or foments conflict. It is the abuse of religion, which then becomes a mask behind which those bent on death and destruction all too often hide.”

Kantor is also president of the European Jewish Congress.

Posted by Lindtner + Humphreys: Roskilde, June 21-24 on Mon, 08 Jun 2015 23:42 | #

Lindtner + Humphreys: Roskilde, June 21-24

Christian Lindtner and Kenneth Humphreys to appear in international conference:

  FYI: There will be an important international conference on the New Testament in Roskilde, Denmark on June 21-24, 2015

  Gospel Interpretation and Q-Hypothesis.

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 10 Jun 2015 02:57 | #

Look what has happened .... to White men.

Not to mention this huge collage of White women murdered by nig boyfriends, what about the White men who have lost their appropriate mating partners to universal maturity?

How many have committed suicide in one way or another?

http://incogman.net/2013/09/they-made-their-beds-then-died-in-it/

Damn that River

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs02sQxNnV0                                                    - Report courtesy Stan Hess

Posted by "Whiteness Studies" on Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:18 | #

Jews, Communists and Genocidal Hate in “Whiteness Studies”
June 12, 2015 — Andrew Joyce

“Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed—not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed” - Race Traitor

As a general rule, you can be fairly certain that any academic discipline that contains the word ‘studies’ within its title can be immediately dismissed on an intellectual level as involving very little studying and a great deal of leftist indoctrination. The relatively new discipline of ‘Whiteness Studies,’ however, is vastly more toxic than the average contemporary effusions of the bloated academic corpus. Indeed, its productions should be seen as nothing less than incitement to the genocide of our people.

Posted by Jewish hand behind Muslim antagonism in UK on Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:22 | #

The Jewish hidden hand behind Muslim ethnic antagonism in the UK
June 10, 2015 — Francis Carr Begbie

You could fill the pages of TOO with examples of hostile Jewish strategies designed to advance the cause of White dispossession, but here are two case studies from the UK which are particularly instructive.

One involves an organisation which has been exposed for false or exaggerated claims about White violence towards Muslims. The second involves the concealment of the ethnic dimension of grooming gangs which targeted White girls. In both cases it is the role of the Jewish hidden hand in exploiting these ethnic conflicts that is interesting….

Full article at TOO: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/06/the-jewish-hidden-hand-behind-muslim-ethnic-antagonism-in-the-uk/

Posted by melvin polatnick on Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:16 | #

Starvation and disease were killing 100 million Russians, thanks to the brilliance of Yiddish Atheists they were saved. The Nazi`s were then defeated because of a strong Bolshevik modernized economy. Economic brilliance was no match for trillions of US dollars which defeated the Yiddish-Russian miracle.

Posted by Ruth, Paul Gottfried and Richard Thpenther on Sun, 16 Aug 2015 02:53 | #

Ruth’s take on terms: a study in Jewish manipulation.

Ruth, Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer are going to set the terms “Left and Right” for us…we should be so grateful for the Jewish clarity..

Ruth just kind of felt like making a video about why she’d like to continue to try to manipulate the terms “left and right”..

http://www.starktruthradio.com/?p=1481

Posted by Robert on Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00 | #

That’s obsurd. We discussed how people become disillusioned with modern consumer culture and see the left as the only alternative. No Jewish conspiracy there.

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:11 | #

No conspiracy theory Robert. Trying to control the narrative, saliently, what counts as “the left” is just the kind of thing that Jews do by second nature.

I also discussed reasons why people gravitate toward leftism in response to guessedworker in the two comments prior to the comment about your show with Ruth.

P.S. I like your show even when I think that the guests are not serving White interests - as I do not believe they are when they try to define Jews as a legitimate part of our cause; when they try to misdefine Jewish unionization, other non White unions and the liberalism that they would impose upon us as “The Left” without specifying that it is not a White Left..

Having said that, it is good to see you here. Feel free to comment. I enjoy your work.

Posted by Dave on Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:20 | #

http://mattforney.com/rachel-haywire-scammed-trigger-warning/

Posted by The Lies Will Try To Live on Wed, 18 Nov 2015 06:18 | #

Red Ice interviews Millennial Woes, the guy who asked to be removed from Majorityrights links, indignant as he was on behalf of “The Truth Will Live”..viz., for this article, “The Lies Will Try to Live but They’re Not White, They’re Jewish.”

That’s the NPI-Alternative-Right big tent for you…

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:09 | #

Jon Bjerknes is on the conspiratorial side in that he over extends what “communism” is and its causality; however, he is not wrong to problematize Hitler as a mixed bag who played a significant negative role in the catastrophe of World War II.

That Kyle Hunt has interviewed him and let him say this in contradiction of Hunt’s position which has been one of defending Hitler in unanimity demonstrates my hypothesis that those who claim to be after “the truth” will eventually be compelled to confront the reality of a more nuanced Hitler whose war mongering was not good for Europeans.

http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/the-solar-storm-christopher-jon-bjerknes-jewish-racism-3-6-16/

It also goes to show (to me) that I am ready to be friends with those who will come around to the side of all Europeans. Including even Hunt, whom I have fought with quite bitterly.

Posted by The lies will try to live on Mon, 26 Sep 2016 06:21 | #

Robert Stark, Rabbit (the guy who is trying to be “the alt-left” and obfuscate a White Left perspective, as is) (((The Truth Will Live))) and (((Alex von Goldstein))), who discuss “hipster culture” (whatever the fuck that is).

http://www.starktruthradio.com/?p=2668

Posted by DanielS on Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:05 | #

I can see reasons to defend Brittany Pettibone, her intention of following the money (IMF and World Bank) is a good idea as well as her denunciation of civic nationalism. As I can see defending Lauren Rose, Tara McCarthy and other ladies who have become vocal in WN circles. They all have good points, even if I don’t trust their judgment to the end.

But there are all kinds of reasons to Not defend Lauren Southern as Greg Johnson has - once again displays surprising naivete (or disingenuousness) in regard to character assessment in this talk with Millennial Woes.

I suspect that racial advocacy might not be a natural fit for Greg, since it is more of a horizontal concern of peoples as opposed to the vertical, heirarchical matter of his elitist predilection. His homosexuality might also be a bit problematic in that it probably makes him a bit too tolerant of female miscegenators, but I don’t want to assimilate right wing exaggeration of homos as an issue.

Nor do I want to forefront Lauren Southern’s miscegenation (assuming that she has done that) as that is not even the first issue with her. The matter is that she is probably Jewish, but obviously abetting misdirection, infiltration and disinformation. She is far from the clear net gain that Greg Johnson assesses her as being for White advocacy - clearly not, in fact.

Posted by mancinblack on Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:25 | #

Okay, maybe I’m beginning to feel a little sympathy for Tara after reading this…
http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com/2017/12/going-it-alone.html#disqus_thread
and trawling through the comments section. I can’t help but wonder how Kumiko feels after events earlier in the year. Personally, I find it quite delicious.

Posted by Backwards Woes on Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:38 | #

Millennial Woes claims that are particularly backwards: says that R types don’t like competition and hierarchy and that’s why they gravitate toward ‘the left” -  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0EDI9uxZOU

R types are hyper competitive and disposed to pursue dominance, and that is why they tend toward liberalism.

Posted by From the horse's mouth (again) on Sat, 07 Jul 2018 07:18 | #

From the horses mouth (again): I’m Not White, I’m Jewish

Posted by (((the spunky trend-setters))) on Wed, 14 Nov 2018 05:23 | #

  ..so they obnoxiously present themselves as being

- especially Francis Nally, a.k.a. “Pilleater”, (((who now confesses to being nearly a quarter Jewish, while his every phony breath is a marketing proposition for “the new trend,” “the new kids scene” ((()))

- (((Vivian Veritas formerly known as “The Truth Will Live))).

- Doooovid (((Jewish guy who is big on welcoming immigrants into your White country)))

- Brundelfly - Host of the show, i.e., Shabbos Goy with Jewish wife.

Posted by Angelo John Ganucci on Sun, 18 Nov 2018 07:30 | #

Latest Brundelfly panel is replete with Alt Right and its satellite luminaries...

Jewish and non-Jewish…

Brundlecast | Richard Spencer, Angelo Gage, Doovid, Josh Neal, Pilpul Wars, The Truth Will Live, Norvin Hobbs, Faustian Spirit..

Angelo Gage has some intelligent concrete observations, and eruditon to pass on, and his new conversion to a suspension of disbelief in civic nationalism provides a way in for Jews to talk (and hang themselves), so that’s good..

But he is decidedly the biggest fuck up on the panel. Colossal.

Angelo John Gage’s invocation of “fallacy of composition” is a fallacy of overstated premise. Biological patterns occur intergenerationally as well as within the life span and not only among the current “elites.”

These patterns require a “fallacy of composition” to marshal necessary separatism in self defense against these patterns.

Mechanism, a willing suspension of disbelief in the narrative of the pattern.

Posted by Right Wing proneness to Reflexive Reversal on Sun, 18 Nov 2018 07:50 | #

Angelo John Gage displays a problem of becoming a premature “expert and leader” by way of right wing influence….you go to an ever narrower extreme in an effort to transcend praxis and ..sooner or later in that Cartesian quest you come to point where you are subject to a reflexive reversal (correction). A similar thing happened with Derek Black.

Posted by Stark interviews 'transhuman' (((Rachel Haywire))) on Thu, 23 May 2019 21:34 | #

Robert Stark talks to (((Rachel Haywire))) about her transhumanist Campaign for President

...transhumanism, the ultimate wish to undifferentiate the gentile.

Posted by mancinblack on Mon, 27 May 2019 17:26 | #

@41 hehehe No wonder she chose the handle “Haywire”. She’s all over the place lol “Nations of the Mind”, yeah, as I don’t believe in “White Privilege” views and opinions matter to me but hell….

Posted by "Conversion" as a means of crypsis on Sun, 01 Sep 2019 11:11 | #

Tanstaafl makes an excellent case that the other two Abrahamic religions provide another strategy for the cryptic infiltration and survival of Jewry among host nations - by crypto maintenance of their own genetic kind while in “conversion” among host nations.

Ethnocentric Europeans tend to believe that their own kind are most easily duped by jews. Some think that Christianity debilitates non-jews, but Islam strengthens them. They’re wrong. For one thing, jews are genetically closer to Turks and Arabs than they are to Europeans. This allows jews to pass more easily among the former than the latter. Also, Islam is not inherently any more antithetical to jewing than Christianity. Both ideologies actually enable jewing, specifically via “conversion”.

Tanstaafl, http://age-of-treason.com/2019/08/31/the-burden-of-jewing-part-2-conversion/

Posted by Melchy Zedek & Jews for Jesus on Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:30 | #

Melchy Zedek has been a part of a smear campaign on behalf of Jewish cucked Christians to try to drive me away from platforms such as Ecce Lux’s and Dennis Dale’s. His chumminess with “The Truth Will Live” confirms my suspicions.

Ecce Lux defended Melchy, the Nazi Ovfuckyou and no punching to the right Tom Anderson from the start; hence my demotion of Ecce’s judgment.

Note: 101:20

Melchy Zedek: People try to figure out what do we do with the people who won’t join the project that the rest of us have signed up for, which is becoming a people..and honestly, the a the answer is pretty simple, just convert to Christianity.

The Truth Will Live: He (a Jewish troll in their chat, going by the name of Levi) doesn’t want to.

Melchy Zedek: I know, but then like, a, he’s a problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6r2diiAOrw

Melchy and a douche bag going by the name of Tom Anderson are constantly trying to smear me, saying in chats that I am a “60 year old Polack / Jew” and things like this. ... getting behind Nazi promoters, even, if that’s what it takes to try to drive my influence away from White advocacy platforms.

Ecce Lux defended Melchy, Nazi Ovfuckyou and Tom Anderson from the start; hence my serious reservation about Ecce’s judgment.

Tom Anderson, who has been one of the most ardent attack dogs set upon me, frequents (((The Truth Will Live)))‘s chat to give her support.

Posted by Light your White candle...Saint Lucia on Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:16 | #

Posted by Vivian Veritas' deceptive "proof" on Tue, 19 May 2020 08:18 | #

..of your lack of conviction in the falseness of the Abrahamic god.

Vivian: “If you were offered ten dollars for your immortal soul, you would almost undoubtedly hesitate - most of you would.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oX2j6x8Ljdw

The reason why I would not feel ashamed about hesitating to Not take $10 for my immortal soul is because I would be thinking of the person asking and how others would perceive my response in relation to how I view the issue - which is to me, a matter of our biological descendants and my mutual responsibility to them. Thus, for the possibility that others have not been taken-in by the false, imposed Abrahamic god, but see rather our true concern as the 14 Words, our biological legacy; hesitation for the matter of that integrity is well warranted.

Posted by mancinblack on Tue, 19 May 2020 09:25 | #

$10 ? vos a kushinyerkeh ! shvindler ! what am I a schlemiel already ? Given the amount of money religion has made from the concept let’s start the bidding at £10,000. I could get more than that for the Indian in my DNA…