Posted by DNA Testing on Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:46 | #

Cooperation in DNA testing could be one of Majority Rights goals in the coming year

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/0/20205874

Posted by Duane on Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:32 | #

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTr7CMV8uSs

Posted by Cohen'sBBC on Thu, 01 Jan 2015 13:19 | #

The BBC’s Danny Cohen as Ethnic Outsider

Tobias Langdon
Occidental Observer
January 1, 2015

To understand the present, study the past. The Bolshevik Revolution is a good place to start. This is what the Russian writer Maxim Gorky (1868-1936) said about the Bolshevik leader Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1870-1924):

  Lenin is a gifted man who has all the qualities of a leader, including these essential ones: lack of morality and a merciless, lordly harshness towards the lives of the masses. As long as I can, I will repeat to the Russian proletariat: “You are being led to destruction, you are being used as material in an inhuman experiment; to your leaders, you are not human.” (See here)

Those harsh Bolshevik attitudes to “the masses” were shaped by ethnic identities, because the leaders were ethnic outsiders with no allegiance or feeling for the Russian people. Lenin was half Mongol, a quarter German and a quarter Jewish. His henchmen Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev were Jewish.  Stalin, Beria, and Ordzhonikidze were Georgians; Dzerzhinsky, the ruthless head of the Checka (Secret Police) during the 1920s, was a Pole with strong pro-Jewish attitudes. The original Cheka was made up largely of non-Russians, and the Russians in the Cheka tended to be sadistic psychopaths and criminals — people who are unlikely to have any allegiance to or identification with their people (here, p. xxxii).

These ethnic patterns help explain the psychology of leading Bolsheviks and their “merciless, lordly harshness” towards the native Russian and Ukrainian majority.

British Jews also behave like ethnic outsiders and, like the Bolsheviks, they have a dramatic influence on society as a whole. Despite being less than 0.5% of the population, British Jews have a huge influence on British politics because of their financial contributions. And their role in the British media is no less. Genuine conservatives sometimes say that the acronym BBC stands for “Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation.” They speak more truly than they know. Just as Jews were hugely over-represented among the Bolshevik leaders, so they are among the BBC’s executives: Alan Yentob, Jenny Abramsky and Mark Damazer, for example.
Danny Cohen, BBC oligarch

Danny Cohen, BBC oligarch

A new name on the list is Danny Cohen, who is director of BBC Television at the age of only 40. But early success hasn’t assuaged an ancient angst:

  The director of television at the BBC has said he has “never felt so uncomfortable as a Jew in the UK” as it was revealed that antisemitic incidents in Britain hit record annual levels in 2014. Danny Cohen used the platform of a conference in Jerusalem to express his fears over what he identified as growing levels of hostility towards Jewish communities in Britain and in other parts of Europe. “I’ve never felt so uncomfortable being a Jew in the UK as I’ve felt in the last 12 months. And it’s made me think about, you know, is it our long-term home, actually? Because you feel it. I’ve felt it in a way I’ve never felt before,” he said.

  Mr Cohen, 40, the former controller of BBC1, said levels of hatred were on the rise across Europe. “You’ve seen the number of attacks rise, you’ve seen murders in France, you’ve seen murders in Belgium. It’s been pretty grim actually,” he told an audience at Jerusalem Cinematheque at a conference addressing the ability of comedy to drive forward social change. […]

  The Gaza conflict led to a sharp rise in antisemitic incidents in Britain, where the Jewish community amounts to 260,000. Following a pro-Palestinian rally in July, a group of young [non-White Muslim] men drove in convoy through a Jewish part of Greater Manchester shouting “Heil Hitler” and throwing eggs and drinks cans at pedestrians. Four teenagers were charged with a physical attack on a rabbi in Gateshead. A sign saying “Child Murderers” was placed outside the Kingston Synagogue, south-west London, in August.

  Vivian Wineman, of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, told The Independent that the number of recorded antisemitic incidents for 2014 was “the highest since records began”, although there has been a fall-off in recent months. “Whilst we have much to celebrate about being Jewish in the UK, a summer filled with hostile, anti-Zionist demonstrations has clearly left its mark,” he said. “Compared to other countries in Europe, the UK still has relatively low levels of antisemitism and it is reassuring to note that the number of recorded antisemitic incidents is returning to former levels. However we must not rest on our laurels. The Board, alongside other Jewish organisations, will continue to work together with government and others to combat this deeply concerning trend.” (BBC director Danny Cohen: Rising UK antisemitism makes me feel more uncomfortable than ever, The Independent, 22nd December 2014)

Danny Cohen clearly sees himself “as a Jew in the UK” rather than British. For him, the UK is a temporary stopping off place depending on the fortunes of his people. Citizenship has nothing to do with having a deep connection to the land or the traditional peoples of the UK. He cares nothing for its long term viability. Unlike the native Brits, he easily contemplates moving elsewhere, perhaps Israel, if things become difficult for Jews in the UK.

Jewish support for displacement level immigration that will alter the society dramatically thus depends not on what is good for the traditional peoples of the UK. If the results of immigration eventually become unmanageable for Jews, they will simply leave — not a viable option for the native British.

But Cohen should ask himself why antisemitism is rising in the UK and Europe. It’s because of something warmly supported by Jews like Danny Cohen and Vivian Wineman: mass immigration by Muslims from the Third World. The antisemitic assaults, murders and abuse are carried out by non-White outsiders, not native White Europeans. But Danny has a plan to manage this “deeply concerning trend.” Rather than focus on the costs of immigration to native White British and push back against the Muslim invasion, Mr. Cohen’s focus is on underscoring Jews as victims:

  Mr Cohen recently announced the BBC’s ambitious plans to mark the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz on 27 January. Holocaust Memorial Day will include a screening of the 10-hour documentary Shoah. In The Eichmann Show, Martin Freeman will play TV producer Milton Fruchtman, who covered the trial of Adolf Eichmann, an architect of the Nazi plan to exterminate Europe’s Jews. Mr Cohen’s decision to give the event high prominence has been described as a response to “growing concern about a rise in antisemitism across Europe”. (Rising UK antisemitism)

Alas, this guilt-tripping won’t work on Muslims, who come from in-bred, clan-dominated societies that draw clear distinctions between the in-group, to whom one is loyal and supportive, and the out-group, on whom one can prey without conscience. And Muslims do indeed prey on non-Muslims in the UK. The growing scandal about Muslim rape-gangs is proof of that.

And what was the stridently pro-feminist BBC doing while thousands of White girls and women were being raped, prostituted and sex-trafficked by violent, hate-filled misogynists? Did it use its vast resources and army of liberal reporters to expose and end these patriarchal horrors? No, sadly not. It was too busy making a film called The Secret Agent:

  … in which undercover reporter Jason Gwynne surreptitiously recorded conversations and speeches of BNP members and leaders. One of the recordings was a private speech by Nick Griffin in Keighley in which the BNP leader specifically discussed “grooming.” Griffin said: “This town should be on everyone’s lips as the place where those pedophile drug rapes went on, because sixty of our children, one is too many, but sixty is a massive rape wave.”

  Griffin listed two causes behind the wave: “The first is our police force and our elected governors haven’t done a damn thing properly about it, and the second is that their [Muslims’] good book tells them that that’s acceptable.” …

  The enterprising “reporter” Gwynne says: “I showed a senior barrister my footage. He said that Griffin’s words are ‘threatening, abusive, or insulting’ and…designed to ‘stir up racial hatred’ a crime under Section 18 of the Public Order Act…the maximum sentence is 7 years in prison.”

  Griffin was prescient — not just about what Muslim immigrants were doing to English children, but how the British government would respond. He was arrested in his home at dawn just before Christmas 2004 and prosecuted for his words. (Rotherham Rape Scandal “Tip Of Iceberg”, VDare, 7th September 2014)

So the BBC did its best to have Griffin jailed for speaking the truth and trying to defend the White British majority.

Why does the official broadcaster in the UK behave like that? Because it’s controlled by people like Danny Cohen, who belong to a minority and are hostile to the majority. That’s why outsider-oligarchs like Cohen support mass immigration and then do thier best to manage its consequences in a way that benefits Jews.

What Maxim Gorky said about the Bolsheviks nearly a century ago applies equally well to the hostile elite that controls the modern West. Ordinary Whites should listen carefully to his words: “You are being led to destruction, you are being used as material in an inhuman experiment; to your leaders, you are not human.”

 

Posted by melba peachtoast on Thu, 01 Jan 2015 18:16 | #

Everything is a remix: true, but there is something else. A tiny impurity may creep in at the moment of remixing, or “creation”. Ordinarily it will never be detected until several more decompositions, accretions, and creations have taken place and amplified the new element, which is originally tiny. Think of PCR. This element is not capable of having been predicted.

Posted by Quantum on Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:00 | #

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/quantum-physics-just-got-less-complicated-rosetta-stone-breakthrough-1480238

Quantum physics just got less complicated with ‘Rosetta Stone’ breakthrough

 
  By Hannah Osborne
  December 19, 2014 11:01 GMT

Quantum physics says that particles can behave like waves, and vice versa. Researchers have now shown that this ‘wave-particle duality’ is simply the quantum uncertainty principle in disguise(Timothy Yeo / CQT, National University of Singapore)

Quantum physics is less mind boggling than once thought, experts have said after discovering two strange features of the quantum world are actually the same thing.

Published in the journal Nature Communications, researchers found that ‘wave-particle duality’ is just a different manifestation of the quantum ‘uncertainty principle’.

Still confused?

Wave-particle duality is the idea that a quantum object could behave like a wave. However, the wave behaviour disappears if you try to locate it.

It can be seen when single particles are fired one by one at a screen containing two narrow slits – the particles pile up behind the slits as a stripy pattern like you would expect from waves, not in two heaps as classical objects would. However, when you look at which slit a particle goes through the interference pattern vanishes.

Quantum uncertainty says that it is impossible to know certain pairs of things about a quantum particle at once ie the more you know the position of an atom, the less able you are to know the speed it is moving. The principle is a limit on the knowability of nature.

Researchers from the Centre for Quantum Technologies at the National University of Singapore note that these two concepts have been part of quantum physics for over 100 years.

Researcher Patrick Coles said: “We were guided by a gut feeling, and only a gut feeling, that there should be a connection.”

The scientists are all experts on equations that reveal how much can be learned about pairs of properties affected by the uncertainty principle. These are known as ‘entropic uncertainty relations’.

They discovered that all the maths previously used to describe wave-particle duality can be reformulated in terms of these relations.

Stephanie Wehner explained: “The connection between uncertainty and wave-particle duality comes out very naturally when you consider them as questions about what information you can gain about a system. Our result highlights the power of thinking about physics from the perspective of information.”

Coles added: “It was like we had discovered the ‘Rosetta Stone’ that connected two different languages. The literature on wave-particle duality was like hieroglyphics that we could now translate into our native tongue. We had several eureka moments when we finally understood what people had done.”

The authors say their discovery gives a greater insight into quantum physics and will allow for new ideas for wave-particle duality applications.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2014/dec/10/scecrets-of-quantum-physics-al-khalili-review

In The Secrets of Quantum Physics (BBC4), Al-Khalili performed an exhaustive series of demonstrations, variously using coins, gloves and at one point cocktail paraphernalia, in order to come to his startling conclusion. For decades Einstein was at loggerheads with Danish physicist Niels Bohr about the nature of reality. “Does the moon cease to exist when I stop looking at it?” he sneered, in response to Bohr’s assertion that reality only existed when it was observed. But it turns out the answer is “Kind of, yes”.

Posted by Tesla on Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:27 | #

Nothing Is Solid & Everything Is Energy – Scientists Explain The World of Quantum Physics
September 27, 2014 by Arjun Walia.

It has been written about before, over and over again, but cannot be emphasized enough. The world of quantum physics is an eerie one, one that sheds light on the truth about our world in ways that challenge the existing framework of accepted knowledge.

What we perceive as our physical material world, is really not physical or material at all, in fact, it is far from it. This has been proven time and time again by multiple Nobel Prize (among many other scientists around the world) winning physicists, one of them being Niels Bohr, a Danish Physicist who made significant contributions to understanding atomic structure and quantum theory.

  “If quantum mechanics hasn’t profoundly shocked you, you haven’t understood it yet. Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.” – Niels Bohr

At the turn of the nineteenth century, physicists started to explore the relationship between energy and the structure of matter. In doing so, the belief that a physical, Newtonian material universe that was at the very heart of scientific knowing was dropped, and the realization that matter is nothing but an illusion replaced it. Scientists began to recognize that everything in the Universe is made out of energy.

  “Despite the unrivaled empirical success of quantum theory, the very suggestion that it may be literally true as a description of nature is still greeted with cynicism, incomprehension and even anger.” (T. Folger, “Quantum Shmantum”; Discover 22:37-43, 2001)

Quantum physicists discovered that physical atoms are made up of vortices of energy that are constantly spinning and vibrating, each one radiating its own unique energy signature. Therefore, if we really want to observe ourselves and find out what we are, we are really beings of energy and vibration, radiating our own unique energy signature -this is fact and is what quantum physics has shown us time and time again. We are much more than what we perceive ourselves to be, and it’s time we begin to see ourselves in that light. If you observed the composition of an atom with a microscope you would see a small, invisible tornado-like vortex, with a number of infinitely small energy vortices called quarks and photons. These are what make up the structure of the atom. As you focused in closer and closer on the structure of the atom, you would see nothing, you would observe a physical void. The atom has no physical structure, we have no physical structure, physical things really don’t have any physical structure! Atoms are made out of invisible energy, not tangible matter.

  “Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual” (1)  – Richard Conn Henry, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University (quote taken from “the mental universe)

It’s quite the conundrum, isn’t it? Our experience tells us that our reality is made up of physical material things, and that our world is an independently existing objective one. The revelation that the universe is not an assembly of physical parts, suggested by Newtonian physics, and instead comes from a holistic entanglement of immaterial energy waves stems from the work of Albert Einstein, Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg, among others.

The Role of Consciousness in Quantum Mechanics

What does it mean that our physical material reality isn’t really physical at all? It could mean a number of things, and concepts such as this cannot be explored if scientists remain within the boundaries of the only perceived world existing, the world we see. As Nikola Tesla supposedly said:

  “The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.”

Fortunately, many scientists have already taken the leap, and have already questioned the meaning and implications of what we’ve discovered with quantum physics. One of these potential revelations is that “the observer creates the reality.”

  A fundamental conclusion of the new physics also acknowledges that the observer creates the reality. As observers, we are personally involved with the creation of our own reality. Physicists are being forced to admit that the universe is a “mental” construction. Pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: “The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. (R. C. Henry, “The Mental Universe”; Nature 436:29, 2005)

One great example that illustrates the role of consciousness within the physical material world (which we know not to be so physical) is the double slit experiment. This experiment has been used multiple times to explore the role of consciousness in shaping the nature of physical reality. (2)

A double-slit optical system was used to test the possible role of consciousness in the collapse of the quantum wave-function. The ratio of the interference pattern’s double-slit spectral power to its single-slit spectral power was predicted to decrease when attention was focused toward the double-slit as compared to away from it. The study found that factors associated with consciousness, such as meditation, experience, electrocortical markers of focused attention and psychological factors such as openness and absorption, significantly correlated in predicted ways with perturbations in the double-slit interference pattern.(2)

This is just the beginning. I wrote another article earlier this year that has much more, sourced information with regards to the role of consciousness and our physical material world:

10 Scientific Studies That Prove Consciousness Can Alter Our Physical Material World.
What’s The Significance?

The significance of this information is for us to wake up, and realize that we are all energy, radiating our own unique energy signature. Feelings, thoughts and emotions play a vital role, quantum physics helps us see the significance of how we all feel. If all of us are in a peaceful loving state inside, it will no doubt impact the external world around us, and influence how others feel as well.

  “If you want to know the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” - Nikola Tesla.

Studies have shown that positive emotions and operating from a place of peace within oneself can lead to a very different experience for the person emitting those emotions and for those around them. At our subatomic level, does the vibrational frequency change the manifestation of physical reality? If so, in what way? We know that when an atom changes its state, it absorbs or emits electromagnetic frequencies, which are responsible for changing its state.  Do different states of emotion, perception and feelings result in different electromagnetic frequencies? Yes! This has been proven. (3)

HERE is a great video that touches on what I am trying to get across here. We are all connected.

  “Space is just a construct that gives the illusion that there are separate objects”  Dr. Quantum (source)

Sources:

(1) http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/The.mental.Universe.pdf

(2) http://media.noetic.org/uploads/files/PhysicsEssays-Radin-DoubleSlit-2012.pdf

(3)http://www.heartmath.org/research/research-publications/energetic-heart-bioelectromagnetic-communication-within-and-between-people.html

communities.washinghttp://media.noetic.org/uploads/files/PhysicsEssays-Radin-DoubleSlit-2012.pdftontimes.com/neighborhood/energy-harnassed/2012/sep/30/secrets-universe-unlocked/

Posted by consciousness on Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:35 | #

Immaterial, Mental & Spiritual
November 11, 2014 by Arjun Walia.

“Consciousness creates reality,” a statement that has gained a lot of attention across various alternative media outlets around the world. Make no mistake, consciousness has been (for quite some time) studied by numerous scientists, especially in its relation to quantum physics and how it might be correlated with the nature of our reality.

What is consciousness? Consciousness includes a number of things. It’s how we perceive our world, our thoughts, being aware, our intentions and more.

  “Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.” – Nasseim Haramein, director of research for the Resonance Project

  “I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulating consciousness.”  –  Max Planck, theoretical physicist who originated quantum theory, which won him the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1918

  “It was not possible to formulate the laws of quantum mechanics in a fully consistent way without reference to consciousness.”  Eugene Wigner, theoretical physicist and mathematician. He received a share of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1963

The statement that “consciousness creates reality” comes with a number of different questions. Does this mean we as individuals (and on a collective level as one human race) can shape and create whatever reality we’d like for ourselves? Does it mean we can manifest a certain lifestyle, and attract certain experiences? Does it happen instantly? Does it take time? How do we do it?

Although we might not be able to answer these questions with absolute scientific certainty, we do know that yes, a correlation between consciousness and our physical material world does indeed exist in some way, shape or form. The extent of that correlation (again from a modern day scientific point of view) is still not well understood, but we know of the correlation, and we know it must have some sort of significance.

  “A fundamental conclusion of the new physics also acknowledges that the observer creates the reality. As observers, we are personally involved with the creation of our own reality. Physicists are being forced to admit that the universe is a “mental” construction. Pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: “The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual.”  – R.C. Henry, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University ,  “The Mental Universe” ; Nature 436:29,2005) (source)

The Science Behind The Statement “Consciousness Creates Reality”

The quantum double slit experiment is a very popular experiment used to examine how consciousness and our physical material world are intertwined. It is a great example that documents how factors associated with consciousness and our physical material world are connected in some way.

One potential revelation of this experience is that “the observer creates the reality.” A paper published in the peer-reviewed journal Physics Essays by Dean Radin, PhD, explains how this experiment has been used multiple times to explore the role of consciousness in shaping the nature of physical reality. (source)

In this experiment, a double-slit optical system was used to test the possible role of consciousness in the collapse of the quantum wave-function. The ratio of the interference pattern’s double slit spectral power to its single slit spectral power was predicted to decrease when attention was focused toward the double slit as compared to away from it. The study found that factors associated with consciousness “significantly” correlated in predicted ways with perturbations in the double slit interference pattern. (source)

  “Observation not only disturbs what has to be measured, they produce it. We compel the electron to assume a definite position. We ourselves produce the results of the measurement.” (source)

Although this is one of the most popular experiments used to posit the connection between consciousness and physical reality, there are several other studies that clearly show that consciousness, or factors that are associated with consciousness are directly correlated with our reality in some way. A number of experiments in the field of parapsychology have also demonstrated this.

Sure, we might not understand the extent of this connection, and in most cases scientists can’t even explain it. However they are, and have been observed time and time again.

Below is a video demonstration from the film “What The Bleep Do We Know.”

Other examples that we’ve written about are government sponsored psychokinesis experiments, the global consciousness experiment, intelligence agency remote viewing experiments, thoughts and intentions altering the structure of water, the placebo effect, teleportation studies and more. You can find more details about those specific experiments HERE.

Some other related CE articles that relate to this subject are listed below:

Buddhist Monks Bless Tea With Good Intention

Fascinating Study Shows Human Intention Can Help Heal Cancer Patients
How We Can Incorporate This Information Into Our Lives & Use Consciousness To Transform The World

Change requires action, but the place within which that action comes from is most important.

Modern day science, especially quantum physics, has been catching up to ancient mysticism and concepts that are/were so deeply ingrained in various cultures throughout the ancient world. One great example of this is the fact that everything is energy , and nothing is solid. You can read more about that here (comment above).

  “We are what we think, all that we are arises with our thoughts, with our thoughts we make the world.” – Gautama Buddha

  “Broadly speaking, although there are some differences, I think Buddhist philosophy and Quantum Mechanics can shake hands on their view of the world. We can see in these great examples the fruits of human thinking. Regardless of the admiration we feel for these great thinkers, we should not lose sight of the fact that they were human beings just as we are.” – Dalai Lama (source)

A great example of quantum physics meeting ancient wisdom is seen in the fact that Nikola Tesla was influenced by Vedic philosophy when pondering his ideas of zero point energy. You can read more about that here.

So why is this relevant? It’s relevant because new physics, as mentioned above, is pointing to the fact that the observer shapes the reality. The way we think and perceive could be responsible and play a vital role in the physical construct we see in front of us.

  “No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” - Unknown

If we look at the world and examine it on a collective level, what do we see? How do we perceive it? Right now, the masses perceive it as being born, going to school, paying bills, raising a family and finding a “job” within the current paradigm to support yourself. No judgement here, but many people on the planet are not resonating with this experience. They want change. We’ve been repeating and perceiving our reality this way for a very long time, with very little information about what is really happening on and to our planet. It’s almost like we are robotic drones that are trained and brainwashed to accept things the way they are. To not question what is happening in our world and to continue on with the status quo, only caring for ourselves and our own lives. As Noam Chomsky would say, our consent has been manufactured. If we continue down this path and continue to perceive and view reality as “this is just the way it is,” we will, in essence, prolong that type of existence and experience for the human race without ever changing it.

In order to create and manifest a new reality for ourselves, our thought patters and the way we perceive reality must change. What changes the way we perceive reality? Information does. When new information emerges it changes the way we look at things and as a result, our reality changes, and we begin to manifest a new experience and open our minds to a broader view of reality. Not to say that we can’t manifest a new physical form in the blink of an eye, and that we are not capable of doing that, but it appears to be something that takes time, something gradual, something we don’t quite understand yet.

What’s also important about teachings from new physics is that, if factors of consciousness are associated with the creation of our reality, that means change starts within. It starts with the way in which we are observing the outer world from our inner world. This touches on the earlier point of how we perceive our reality. Our perception of the external world might very well be a reflection of our inner world, our inner state of being. So ask yourself, are you happy? Are you observing, perceiving and acting from a place of love? From a place of hate or anger? From a place of peace? All of these factors are associated with our consciousness, with our observation, the one (or the many) who are doing the “observing” might play a large role in what type of physical world the human race manifests for itself, what do you think?

We are indeed the observers,  can we create change and break patterns to open up new possibilities, change our direction, all through the way in which we observe ourselves, others and the world around us.

I believe that the human race is in the process of waking up to a number of different things, simultaneously. As a result, the way we perceive and “observe” the world around us (on a mass scale) is starting to drastically change. So if you want to help change the world, change the way you look at things, and the things you look at will change.

  “Be the change you want to see in the world.” – Mahatma Ghandi

  “There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement.” This statement (worldview statement) was by Lord Kelvin in 1900, which was shattered only five years later when Einstein published his paper on special relativity. The new theories proposed by Einstein challenged the current (at that time) framework of understanding. This forced the scientific community to open up to an alternate view of the true nature of our reality. A great example of how things that once were regarded as truth have changed.

  “Lord Kelvins statements bares with it the voice of paradigms past…We knew that the Earth was flat, we knew that we were the center of the universe, and we knew that a manmade heavier than air piece of machinery could not take flight. Through all stages of human history, intellectual authorities have pronounced their supremacy by ridiculing or suppressing elements of reality that simply didn’t fit within the framework of accepted knowledge. Are we really any different today? Have we really changed our acceptance towards things that won’t fit the frame? Maybe there are concepts of our reality we have yet to understand, and if we open our eyes maybe we will see that something significant has been overlooked.” – Terje Toftenes (source)

Posted by centuryofself on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 05:17 | #

The Century of Self (as advised by Graham Lister and Stan Hess)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taHVE4BjJ84

Posted by Fr. John+ on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 13:58 | #

“​We will continue our course of being unfettered by traditional religions and their ill-fit to European interests.”

Thanks for at least being ‘white enough/Christian enough’ to tell the truth.
I’ll not venture to read this site from here on out.

You have nothing to say to anyone with the barest inkling of what Europe is all about, as the repository of Christendom for over 20 centuries. Nor do you have any organic link to the great minds of the West- even those that rebelled against the Stupor Mundi, the Queen of the Sciences, the Deposit of the Faith once given to Men of Europe.

I can understand if you believe modern Apostate Protestantism, or Bergoglio Marxist Papism are aberrations from the norm.

But to deny the factuality of the Christian religion as the very heartbeat of the West?

Your house is left unto you desolate.

 

Posted by Silly man on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 14:07 | #

You won’t be missed..

I have seen the bile you dump upon other Europeans…

You post at The Daily Stormer with that kind of stuff and you pretend to be an honorable man, one concerned for European interests. You are a silly man. Go back to the Daily Stormer where you belong.

Posted by Arcidus on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 13:21 | #

Some of these structural problems identified by Sallis makes me think American WN is a lost cause.
http://eginotes.blogspot.com.au/2015/01/funding-movement-three-practical.html

At least Europe is making some progress.

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 14:08 | #

All is a lost cause if your appeal is so exogenous as to try to persuade those who do not want it.

If the goals are more modest and essential there is far more hope.

If the goal is to whom it may concern (as is the target of The Euro DNA Nation) then there is abundant reason to hope. It only takes a few people to say they see this as a “nation” worthy of preserving and coordinating in its virtual space, who may then start building numbers - I understand 14,000 - 21,000 is necessary to avoid inbreeding. Along the way, they may target land claims however small and remote before the more ambitious projects, e.g. taking back ancient European territories which are now occupied.

Nevertheless, let me have a look at Ted’s article, old friend of MR that he is.

* One reservation suggested about the Euro DNA Nation was that it lacks operationalization. However, I believe the notion of rotation of duties and judicious use of the life-span begins to provide an answer as to how it would be handled, i.e., negotiated in a healthy and optimal way.

Posted by flexible solutions on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 14:52 | #

I think there is cause for optimism in The DNA Nation regarding Sallis’ concerns: over the propensity for squandering of money, lack of security and veiled intent from an ostensible big tent proposition which ends up excluding or attacking certain European ethnes; anybody who knows me would realize that is something that I notice in American WN. However, I maintain that it is not necessary.

The concerns that support will be wasted, lack of security, EGI blindsiding:

These problems stem from an endogenous and overly centralized approach.

Blindsiding: Because the Euro DNA Nation requires one to specify their European ethnicity, it does not require them to mask their concern for it, thus the blindsiding is removed; and because it seeks to optimize levels of relative purity and mixing between the European groups, any background anxiety caused by a lack of understanding of perils to one group or relative non-threat are mitigated; they are dealt with openly AND subject to significant control by the individual. That could alleviate some of the greatest source of conflict. More, as we seek to preserve all Europeans in their distinct kinds and can envisage their coordination toward the same ends it stands to reason that we all have a better chance if we do coordinate, if not cooperate in our interests.

Squandering of money: Because the Euro DNA Nation is a network of people spread through various localities financing can be largely controlled locally (say, in a manner that Migchels would advise) as a safeguard against the mismanagement of any centralized, common funds.

Lack of security: What are they going to infiltrate? Our DNA? Well maybe they will try but that will be hard and we will have means to test. Where are they going to infiltrate? We are anywhere, here and gone in a moment, free moving and in so many places throughout the world that there is no one target that can bring us down.

Posted by JewsARaceOrNot on Mon, 05 Jan 2015 01:37 | #

Wolf Wall Street has raised the objection (observing Metzger’s position that Jews are not a race, but rather a culture of criminal conspiracy) that we would be hoodwinked by treating Jews as a race - as we would by treating them as a genetically identifiable entity.

Hosted by: W.W.S.
Title: 125 - CULTURE-ETHNICITY-RACE
Time: 01/04/2015 10:37 AM EST

There are many advantages to looking at them Metzger’s way. He is no fool.

However, while I will not claim for the Euro DNA Nation that it should be anything like the only approach, it is one of the most essential.

For one essential matter, we are trying to preserve our DNA as Europeans in all its variety and depth.

It is obviously true that many Jews can fool others into thinking that they are European through their evolutionary crypsis.

And yes, there are people with non-Jewish DNA who identify religiously or otherwise as Jews -  such as Luke Ford http://www.starktruthradio.com/?p=956 , or people who may as well be Jews, what Metzger and WWS so aptly call “Jew thinkers.”

However, MacDonald and many others believe and I agree, that Jews as an entity are genetically identifiable. Ultimately, they treat themselves that way - as a systemic organism defending itself. In fact, even requiring genetic tests of people wanting to be Israeli citizens to confirm their Jewish identity.

You can become Jewish by religious conversion to some extent, but it is limited. As we all know, the further toward the inner circle the stricter the genetic concern is: from converts who will be grudgingly accepted as someone who will not hurt Jews and can come to Jewish services; to people who have a Jewish father, who will be accepted, if they do something tremendously good for Jews, rejected utterly if they do something bad for them, but cannot become Israeli citizens (so far as I know); to ones with Jewish mothers, who can be Israelis but not part of the inner circle; to the kohanim inner circle, in which both parents are Jewish and the genetic Jewish line is supposedly and notoriously traceable back to biblical Jews.

But a fundamental matter for Europeans is DNA as well. A Chinese person who converts to Judaism cannot infiltrate our DNA Nation by stealth.

A European person who converts to Judaism apparently could infiltrate. However, crucially, they could not infiltrate in their verifiable actions. Our requirement is the reconstructing of our DNA. Thus, if a European convert to Judaism assists in reconstructing European DNA they are merely assisting our people to some extent. Naturally, we would have to pay attention to what they are doing in particular. There are relevant factors such as that (their manipulation) beyond the purview of science which the scientist as political actor must be aware of, brought to analysis, whether he is at first aware or not.

Posted by Bob in DC on Mon, 05 Jan 2015 05:13 | #

Copy and re-copy one’s own self, improving. That’s progress!

DNA analysis must be jewless — esp. kikejewless.

They’re inbred genetized mutants with

criminally reified markers.

RESISIT !!!

Posted by melba peachtoast on Mon, 05 Jan 2015 18:17 | #

RESISIT !!!  POOR SPERRING IS AN INDEX OF MENTAL DEMANGEMENT !!! ALSO CAPS !!!

Posted by InvisibleMan on Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:22 | #

O’reilly, Duke and the invisible man, Scalise

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq9Puk6DzSg

Posted by TT says on Tue, 06 Jan 2015 20:49 | #

TT says:

Yes he has no problem attacking jews but not much about predatory capitalist and Christian judaism

I would love to debate him but he would never agree to it..

I hope you see my point. Its far to easy to make all jews (devil)  the sin eaters when Christians are more jew than many jews.

I see your point. I always listen to you.  I’d be a fool not to.

Posted by Colored People on Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:53 | #

Contradicting what Duke and Black are constantly saying, “that blacks didn’t used to be so bad”

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,810262-1,00.html

THEY are afraid to say so in public, but many of the North’s big-city mayors groan in private that their biggest and most worrisome problem is the crime rate among Negroes.

In 1,551 U.S. cities, according to the FBI tally for 1956, Negroes, making up 10% of the U.S. population, accounted for about 30% of all arrests, and 60% of the arrests for crimes involving violence or threat of bodily harm—murder, non-negligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. In one city after another, the figures—where they are not hidden or suppressed by politicians—reveal a shocking pattern. Items:

New York (14% Negro). Of the…

Posted by DanielS on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:55 | #

Don Black’s accomplice, “Truck Roy,” normally comes to their weekday discussions equipped (perhaps with the help of “the bugs people”) with provocative analytical distinctions. On this day, however, his analysis appeared instructive for its being a little off the mark:

Archives: http://renseradioarchives.com/stormfront/
Date: 01-26-15 - Hr1

“Ideologies,” he says, have invariably led to disaster. I guess that he is talking about communism, multiculturalism and other such worldviews which are imposed unnaturally, forcibly upon a populace from without as opposed to having emerged from their nature.

I suspect that the Right is going to say that Nazism is an ideology based on nature and that they would not be inclined to criticize it as such. That goes to crucial matters of what and how nature really is, and if Nazism necessarily captured its essence and ways. It didn’t, but that’s not a matter to go into here.

Returning from that digression, Truck Roy contrasts “ideology” with “tradition” and “family” as the organic starting points which safeguard against the disasters of ideologies - erstwhile imposed affectations, having led by known example only to catastrophe and failure; while people invariably rebel in accordance with the tried and true of tradition and natural concern of family.

Here his argument gets interesting as it begins to fall apart with his examples.

“The tradition” of Christianity which is “tried and true.” I would suggest that it is a kind of hazy hoodwink of an ideology but more importantly, not sufficiently successful, not even provisionally, for anything but raising and corralling cattle for our enemies to consume - its tradition as a provisional “safe place” for the speculative event that a sufficient ideology does present itself. We must do better in assimilating an organic moral order.

But still I do not care to elaborate dispute with his argument, as getting away from that particular, endless dispute is a part of MR’s new direction.

What is more interesting is that in the service of organicism, and “the family” as its central model (one of Matt Parrott’s key contentions against the Euro-DNA Nation), Truck Roy cites “the lunchroom phenomonenon.”

Here is the point which shown interesting - you don’t sit next to your family in the lunchroom. You sit next to racial kin.

This phenomenon is organic, it is genetic, and it does not exclusively begin with “tradition” and not exclusively with family. That is not to diminish the significance of family and tradition, but to illustrate that there are limits to the idea of tradition and family being “The” foundation in some organic sense.

If you were to wipe-out all records of history and put Europeans on an island where they were starting out all over again, I do not believe that they would come up with something like Christianity, organically, to serve as their moral order. And lets state the obvious to say that if the family were so singularly important the result would be inbreeding. The normative factors of the social classification and its genetic basis are indispensable, essential, not speculative and dangerous “ideology.” To the contrary, to be without the relative and normative guidance of its framework is, and has been dangerous.

Not all of our traditions remain sufficient to the times and not all families are good and just to their members. They do not represent the sine qua non of organicism - their regulation with broader systems through proper hermeneutic process, is.