Anti-racism for Irish toddlers

Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 26 November 2005 12:00.

A sublime self-parody of ultra-leftist social engineering in Ireland has been brought to my amazed attention by Michael R. I particularly admire these “childcare committees in south Dublin and Fingal” who hope to spread their methods throughout the country. Wonderfully loving people, I’ll bet. Wonderful. Clearly, the citizens committees of revolutionary France reverberate down all the Dublin days.

RACISM among Irish toddlers will be tackled at a conference for childcare providers in Dublin later this month. International research shows that children can form prejudices against other races even as babies and pre-schoolers.

Workers in creches and childcare facilities will be shown how games and activities can prevent such discrimination forming.

The anti-racism initiative is being organised by childcare committees in south Dublin and Fingal who hope it will provide a blueprint for child carers across the country.

Julia Hackett, a co-ordinator on the south Dublin committee, says it is important for children to acknowledge the differences between people at an early age and learn to accept them.

“Children from a very early age acknowledge the difference between people. We want to bring together the childcare professionals that are working on the ground to develop practical anti-bias approaches that are active, indeed activist, so that we can challenge prejudice, stereotyping and bias,” she said. “Childcare professionals want activities for the children to encourage them to feel comfortable with the differences and similarities between themselves and others.

“By listening to the professionals we will be able to find the best way to integrate these activities and plans into the existing curriculum rather than just having them as an add-on.”

Hackett says the group hopes to be able to provide guidelines to childcare facilities about the inclusion of different nationalities — including providing halal meat on menus.

The conference will be opened by Brian Lenihan, the minister for children, on Saturday. A special report looking at barriers to accessing childcare for lone parents, parents of children with special needs, travellers, asylum seekers and refugees will also be launched.

The research carried out by Fingal County Childcare Committee is expected to show how difficult marginalised groups find it to get their children into pre-school childcare.

Tags:

Comments:

Posted by Andrew on Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:19 | #

MMM interesting, I have met some 1 and 2 year old racist Nazis, usually they are of Islamic or Arab descent, I suppose we need to get the Anglo toddlers up to speed, I wonder if that is what they mean.
The looters collect 250 thousand pound’s a year to think this up, compound that by the number of looters, then we are heading for the greatest economic depression and carnage in the history of mankind. This is a simple anecdotal taste of the newer Agitprop Sub-Intellectual contribution of the brain-dead. You can not ignore or dismiss it any longer; people must act now to prevent any further disintegration. And treat this as Psychological pedophilia, for that is what it is, abusing toddlers minds indoctrinating and messing with their minds, that is just as criminal as physical pedophilia.

Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:47 | #

Too true. However I believe pedophilia,which of course denotes love, may not be ‘le mot juste’ and would replace it with pedophobia in order to illustrate the not-so-hidden aversion felt by many auto-racist Leftists towards White people’s offspring.

Posted by JB on Sun, 27 Nov 2005 01:15 | #

But I thought nobody was born a racist

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 27 Nov 2005 01:49 | #

“But I thought nobody was born a racist” (—JB, in an appropriate bit of sarcasm)

The so-called “racism” being targeted for elimination from the brains of these toddlers is ultimately the harmless, normal, natural set of human instincts that would, if left in place to adulthood, equip them as Irish adults with the potential to, among other normal and healthy things, 1) see their race as a race—which is exactly what it is (a “sub-race” if anyone prefers, a sub-race of the whites, but certainly at least the whites, not the yellows, the Negroes, the Mexicans, or whoever else certain forces want to replace them with), and 2) oppose its deliberate extermination through government policies such as excessive incompatible immigration forced on unwilling, unconsulted domestic populations for the (falsely-perceived) benefit of some aloof, élite, self-regarding interest group or other.

Yes, these instincts if left in place risk making them call those dwelling in Calais “wogs” but that’s a risk I’m more than willing to take if it means the Irish race won’t some day be deliberately extinguished from the world. Hey just let the wogs develop thicker skins, why can’t we? When I get called “gringo” by the Mexes I seem to hold up pretty well ... doesn’t phase me a bit. Let the wogs do like me.

It might also make them object to their country being overrun by non-whites? Well, I call that a good thing. People are supposed to have the instincts in place to prompt them to object to that sort of genocide. It’d be sad if they didn’t.

Also, ever notice how some groups get to keep these instincts while others apparently have to have them drummed out of their psyches from the tenderest age? What’s up with that? How come what’s sauce for the goose nowadays is so seldom ever sauce for ... well ... for the usual suspects? Are there school programs aimed at taking away the ethnic self-identity instincts of litte Jewish kids? Little Negro kids? Little Moslem kids? I’ve certainly never heard of any. Then why inflict that crap on little Irish or other Euro kids? Is it so they won’t resist twenty years from now when George Soros, the U.N., the E.U., and the others will have them where they want them (i.e., ripe for racial elimination)?

These instincts referred to as “racism” and targeted for elimination are normal. They should be left alone. These kids aren’t all going to grow up to be philosophers, and will depend largely on natural, normal instincts of the “us-them” variety to guide them later in life, when they will be the voting polity and the ones running things, regarding matters of common-sense group health and even survival.

Who exactly is paying for this stuff, either directly or indirectly? This stuff costs money. It doesn’t just pop up out of nowhere. Some interest group is pushing it, which is the reason, the only reason, we’re now reading about it. The usual suspects are toiling behind the scenes to get this pushed on us. Is it paid for (directly or indirectly) or inspired (directly or indirectly) by Soros’ NGOs? What is (directly or indirectly) its source of funding? The marxist-through-and-through Ford Foundation? Political money from elsewhere in the extreme leftist or Tranzi Anglo world funneled through the E.U. or the U.N., finding its way to Ireland and other targets to be used by clueless women, pantywaist men, and local communists? I’d like the sources of funding for this crap to be publicized, this transparent attempt to get at the normal ethnic instincts of a national group from the earliest stages of childhood and eliminate them for later when the targets, now adults no longer daring to view themselves as a racial group or as having an ethno-cultural-racial identity worth preserving, will be sitting ducks for race-replacement immigration, affirmative action, multiculturalism, diversity-worship, and so forth at the hands of enemies who wsih to see the last of them.
______
—”All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.” —Enoch Powell

—Moratorium-plus-Repatriation!

—Balkanization is better then Brazilianization!

—The 1965 Immigration-Holocaust Act: the gift that keeps on giving!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 27 Nov 2005 01:57 | #

(“doesn’t phase me” should of course have been “doesn’t faze me”)
______
”All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.” —Enoch Powell

Moratorium-plus-Repatriation!

Balkanization is better then Brazilianization!

The 1965 Immigration-Holocaust Act: the gift that keeps on giving!

Posted by The Other Guy on Sun, 27 Nov 2005 12:56 | #

“All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.” —Enoch Powell

Moratorium-plus-Repatriation!

Balkanization is better then Brazilianization!

The 1965 Immigration-Holocaust Act: the gift that keeps on giving!

Tippecanoe and Tyler Too!

Fifty Four Forty or Fight!

No use crying over spilt milk!

Buddy can you spare a dime!

Blah blah blah blah blah!

Posted by JB on Tue, 09 May 2006 05:28 | #

RACIST TODDLERS THREATEN TO TAKE OVER ENGLAND
Prime Minister organizes emergency meeting with daycare centers workers’ union leaders, the generals and the Queen.

DAILY TELEGRAPH

Children may learn to categorise people as early as the age of three, experts warned

They may still be in nappies and playing with sand and building blocks but many toddlers are already racists, nurseries have been warned.

To stop prejudice from developing while children are still three years old, staff need to ensure that different racial groups “play together right from day one”, according to Herman Ouseley, the former chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality.

Nursery staff should “discourage separate play” and “help children to unlearn any racist attitudes and behaviour they may have already learnt”, said Lord Ouseley.

“It is important to consider whether patterns of play are consistently based on racial or cultural grounds,” he writes in the latest issue of the journal Race Equality Teaching.

“If, for example, Muslim children nearly always play together and seldom play with other children, the question needs to be asked, ‘Is there a reason for it that may relate to culture? Or apprehension? Or prejudice?’,” said Lord Ouseley, the author of an influential report on the 2001 Bradford riots.

The recommendation that staff intervene to ensure that children mix goes further than current thinking and guidance, which concentrates on making sure nurseries cater to all ethnic groups.

Jane Lane, a co-author of the article and an early-years equality adviser whose publications are recommended by the Government’s Sure Start scheme, said conventional wisdom that toddlers were “colour blind” was wrong.

“There is a view that children do not learn their attitudes until they are about five,” she said. “But people in the early years know that children at a very early age - at the age of three - are categorising people. I am not talking about white children; I am talking about all children. Many, many are racially prejudiced, for all sorts of historical reasons.”

We shall fight in the nursery wards. We shall fight in the infant schools. We shall fight in the parks, and in the circuses, we shall fight in the daycare centers. We shall never surrender!

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 09 May 2006 07:44 | #

“all sorts of historical reasons”

Perhaps these infant prodigies are anti-English due to their having access to the document which quoted Lord John Russell’s private reply when he was told about the horrendous death-rate of the Irish Potato Famine : ” I fear it is hardly enough”.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 09 May 2006 10:18 | #

JB,

Ouseley one can immediately discount as a race huckster.

But Jane Lane is a white liberal. Here, she is voicing the standard nut-left conviction that nothing above the neck is genetically derived ... and, anyway, even if it was we are only fully human if we reject the disposition of Nature and “choose” a (necessarily politically liberal) identity.

Now, this is very childish psychology, and does not in any way address the true dynamic of human freedom ... which is the transcendence through consciousness of all that is acquired in oneself. It brings one to that which is real (including, of course, that which is genetically derived). The endless pursuit of choice-based superfice is just a secular religion. It is, in the case of the specially heinous sin of racism also itself deeply racist, since only whites are in moral need of the silly-liberal One World Love-In.

Posted by Amalek on Tue, 09 May 2006 11:17 | #

Babies as young as three months show a preference for faces from their own race, say psychologists:

http://proportionalbelief.blogspot.com/2006/02/recognition-and-bias.html

Help is on the way, maybe!

The authors of the study suggest that this facial recognition bias, as natural and built-in as it appears to be, might be counteracted by frequent and sustained exposure to people from other races, that is, if caucasian babies spend time around African adults and African babies spend time around caucasian adults. But they aren’t really sure about that.