|
|
|
Betrayal, self-help and civil disobedience by David Hamilton The Ideological Caste in the broad sense - the corporate, banking and political classes, intellectuals and academics, media personnel, and so forth - are in league with people who are engaged in taking our country off us and taking our children’s futures from them. Enoch once stated that immigrants are swaggering around our cities like conquerors. More people every day are also starting to see it as it becomes clearer what is really going on. I have written before that our elites are surrendering us to Islam by allowing them to take over. At the highest levels, bankers and politicians make deals to get money from people like the Saudis, who finance Wahhabism, to conquer the West through a pincer movement of violence and cultural infiltration. The Prime Minister and Lord Mandelson asked the Saudis to put money into the IMF and offered them and other Gulf states more influence in global institutions in return. Barclays Bank, has had nearly £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar. This has consequences in ordinary life. 1. Islamist ideas are spread through our country by Islamic study centres attached to universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities - including Oxford and Cambridge - have had more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985. Prince Charles is its honorary patron. Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted in the Daily Mail of 5th July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity’s history for its violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an alliance between the two faiths for ‘the common good’. Does he intend to destroy his own church? 2. The elites submitted to Saudi threats when they abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because the Saudi authorities threatened: ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk, as explained by Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. These are the controllers of terror groups in the West that Brown and other elites are colluding with against their own people! 3. Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking. Sharia finance was founded in mid-20th century by Islamist ideologues to further global Islamic rule by creating separate administrative systems. Muslims have to donate some of their income to charity, and that goes through the Sharia banking system. The clerics who distribute the money are advocates of terror like Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports suicide bombing in Iraq and Israel, and Sheik Muhammed Taqi Usmani, who ran a madrassa that supported the Taliban, yet sits on the Sharia supervisory board of the Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund. 4. With encouragement from our rulers, Muslims are creating a rival legal system. The Sunday Times September 14th 2008 reported that Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain. The government secretly sanctioned the powers for Sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of five Sharia courts are enforceable by the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. Before this, rulings of Sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced and required voluntary compliance among Muslims. There are now , with twenty-two in the Midlands alone, which shows how quickly Muslims are taking over our country with the encouragement of the decadent authorities. 5. I understand that former Chief Constable of West Yorkshire the late Colin Cramphorn told a meeting that child abuse is part of our future so “get used to it”! In 2004 he also managed to get a Channel 4 investigation into Muslim child-grooming spiked on the grounds that it would “increase community tensions”. [Thanks to Lionheart for the videos - Ed] When the Caste betrays us in such a fashion, sinking so low as to look the other way when Muslim men groom and rape our children, we are plainly on our own. We have to form self-help groups, and we have to contemplate civil disobedience. The catalyst for civil disobedience was when Muslims in Luton insulted the local regiment, The Royal Anglians, on their homecoming march through the town. This rioting in Luton was covered up. Anjem Choudary is the voice of Al Qaeda and the British front of the global Jihad to convert our nation from the Dar al-Harb, into the Dar al-Islam. He has been holding road shows throughout Britain with the blessing of the authorities to promote Sharia law for our country in a power struggle between our communities, which last week included the insult to us of the conversion to Islam of an eleven year old English boy in Birmingham. This is the sort of thing the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams is working for. Choudrey stated that Southall should be the centre of power “when Islam takes over the UK”. His followers cheered as he called for Muslims to “rise up” and seize power in Britain. He has allies in the British Establishment who are encouraging the introduction of Sharia Law and, out of hatred for their own people, are encouraging Muslims to push them out by massive immigration to augment their high birth levels. Several prominent lawyers have called for Sharia Law: Anne Elizabeth Oldfield Butler-Sloss, Baroness Butler-Sloss (née Havers) GBE PC; Nicholas Addison Phillips, Baron Phillips of Worth Matravers PC, (born 21 January 1938) is the Senior Lord of Appeal in Ordinary. He was Master of the Rolls from 2000 to 2005 and Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales from 2005 until 1 October 2008; and Stephen Hockman QC, an influential figure among barristers. These evil people are the causes of the problems on our streets as they are encouraging Anjem Choudrey’s Muslim revolution. To defend our communities and our daughters, British people are having to form self-help groups. They are utterly disillusioned with the rich, cosy-living Caste that is having them pushed out of their communities and keeps the child-rape of young white girls of eleven and twelve by Muslims quiet. The state deals with by media blackouts under DA-notices and oppression by the political police. A member of The English Defence League who opposed Choudry’s roadshow to spread Sharia Law on July 4th in North London explained:
Suddenly, about eight police wagons and cars arrived, police scrambled out surrounding the protesters in a heavy handed way. The group of young Moslems had phoned the police alleging that the protesters had been racially abusive to them. Two young protesters were manhandled, then arrested and then taken away in a police wagon. The rest of the protesters were searched, filmed, had personal details taken and verified, and threatened with arrest if we walked into the centre of Haringay. A Section 60 order was in force in the borough for the day. Choudary had spotters out in the borough pinpointing where the EDL were. Then some young Muslim arrived to stir the group up, those Moslem kids then phoned the police crying ‘racism’, the police came and arrested people for racism. The arrests justify the police action? It is a group of young Moslems’ word against the EDL members who were arrested, and those members who were present who heard and saw what went on but the British legal system is biased against their own people. Will this be used as a show trial for the State to show solidarity with Muslims against us? The group who had stayed in Wood Green learned that Choudary had set up his road show in a neighbouring borough to avoid Section 60. The group were joined by some United British Alliance members who carried out the protest without notifying anyone. They disrupted Choudary’s roadshow - he called in about twenty of his men of whom around six badly beat one of the group who was then run over by a bus and had to be taken to hospital unconscious in an ambulance. The Muslim thugs then besieged the pub where the protesters had met and smashed it up and threw objects through the windows at those inside. Remarkably the police didn’t notice this! It took this protest for the police to authorise the Section 60 powers and move Choudry on? But shouldn’t they be using these powers wherever he sets up a roadshow that is promoting the takeover of our country, and is recruiting for that purpose? Muslims in Europe mobilize many street soldiers within a matter of minutes, consonant with Lord Ahmed’s threat to mobilise ten thousand outside parliament to prevent Dutch MP Geert Wilders showing his film “Fitna” to members of the House of Lords. The defenders of our communities will respond by improving communications to warn others of attacks in a particular area. Muslims will increase attacking people in force and picking off those in small groups and blaming those they attack knowing the law is on their side. There seem to be many Muslims who want a fight. It would be best to be prepared as the authorities are allowing them to do it. The defenders will certainly need a digital camcorder to record these events for evidence to counter the fabrications of the State. There was also a protest in Birmingham where the conversion of the young English boy took place. It is the city where the terrorists tried to capture and behead a Muslim soldier in the British Army. It is where, in an editorial in The Birmingham Post a couple of years ago, some drip asked, “Is there anything intrinsically wrong with Muslims becoming a majority?” A protester in Birmingham related:
Comments:2
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:30 | # The first time I saw the claim that our side needed a “philosophy” and was weakened from supposedly not having one, was several months back (maybe a year?) when Prof. Paul Gottfried commented to this effect in a piece over at Taki’s blog. (Gottfried was referring to what he termed “the white nationalists,” by which he meant, I imagine, people who think as I do about racial issues, but a term I absolutely reject for myself.) My reaction to Gottfried was to scratch my head in bewilderment, as we had only to invoke already existing philosophy if we needed philosophical “back-up” for our side. We’re being murdered in our race. Saying we need a new philosophy seemed to me like saying a guy in the process of being murdered needs a new philosophy before he can complain or resist. He doesn’t and we don’t: it’s OK to complain and resist when you’re being murdered. I’m confident if you look it up in Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and everyone else you’ll find that in there. See? It’s just a matter of looking it up and getting on with the resistance in full knowledge that you’re backed up philosophically. To the hilt. I didn’t see the need for “a new philosophy” and still don’t. But as everyone knows GW accepts that there’s a need (which shapes a lot of his commentary) as do a great many others on our side (most recently that I saw, Friedrich:
( http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1015615&postcount=36 ) Still not convinced, and never any good at philosophy anyway, I remain strictly on the sidelines where this venture is concerned, watching the philosophers thrash out our side’s new philosophy — among them Ian Jobling, who struts his stuff on this topic in a new essay up yesterday called ”Prologue to a Political Philosophy for the Pro-White Movement”, here: Hey go for it! I’m perplexed, damn right I am, but hey, as I’ve always said, I’m in favor of anything that works! Onward to victory! 3
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:46 | #
And yes that goes for microcommunities and a barter economy, as I’ve also always said: if microcommunities and a barter economy have the potential to get us out of this mess, I’m all in favor! I don’t have a list of successful strategies that I approve and a list of successful strategies that I disapprove. If they’re successful, I approve. Period. 4
Posted by Armor on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:05 | # Paul Gottfried, GW, Friedrich Braun…
5
Posted by Armor on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:23 | #
It is unlikely that Plato and Kant ever felt the need to argue against race-replacement. What can be said is that any one who finds value in Plato can only be against race-replacement, because in the end, race-replacement makes everything we value meaningless, including Plato’s thoughts. That is why I am surprised to see so many intellectuals completely ignoring the immigration disaster. 6
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:31 | # I’m sure I could go through the canon of Western Philosophy starting with the Pre-Socratics on up, and distill therefrom an irrefutable justification for opposition to our forced race replacement, and I’m certain I could go through the Bible and formal Catholic and Protestant theology and distill the same on purely Christian grounds, which is why it infuriates me that the Christian authorities aren’t doing it: they MUST CONSCIOUSLY WANT EURO-RACE REPLACEMENT BY NON-WHITES (mixture with non-whites is the same as replacement). 7
Posted by Dan Dare on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:24 | # This seems to me to encapsulate the matter:
When I was in primary (US elementary) school in the 1950s the classroom had a large map of the world in which a quarter of the landmass was coloured pink, and were hundreds of other islands, islets and archipelagoes around the globe. This was the erstwhile British Empire, something that our teachers had no qualms in instructing us about, in particular about how our island race had created completely functioning societies in deserted continents that no-one else had been able to before. We also learned about how benighted societies in Africa, Asia and elsewhere were freed from the blights of slavery and superstition and brought into the modern age of technological progess, parliamentary democracy and the rule of law, and how countless millions were freed from the rule of cruel and despotic autocracies. That was the mythical vision that we were given. And yet in less than a generation it was no longer taught within the state educational system, and today it forms nothing more than a convenient pretext for ritual self-abasement. It seems to me that the vision that we need to cultivate and promote moving forward is one that is firmly grounded upon the glittering achievements of our forebears, which are unique and unprecedented in human history. We need to eliminate the conditioning that causes our young folk today to grovel and apologise to people whose forebears had little to do with creating a civilisation which has benefited the entire planet, allowing billions of humans to exist who would not otherwise have been able to do so. The creators of this civilisation were not, for the most part, philosophers but men of action and daring. That is what we need to recapture. 8
Posted by Steven E. Romer on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:19 | # The white race is unique. It has unique and valuable traits, it has a unique world outlook and culture. It should not be allowed to die out. It is an irreplaceable world resource, headed in a new direction for life on Earth. We are in the middle o fspeciating into a new species. Mixing with other races will lead to a dark spiral where we move onto other paths which are dead-ends. Other races to us are diseases to delicate babies. We are quite susceptible since we are a race in it’s infancy. All history, and DNA evidence supports this. We may have introduced smallpox to the indians, which was unfortunate. Other DNA from other races will wip eus off the Earth forever though. That’s worse. Earth will become a living hell if this happens. All other races are dead-ends or remnants of this one true path the white race is on. What more do you need? 9
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:29 | #
Love that. That’s very good. Music to mine ears. That’s all the philosophy I need: I’m convinced. Where do I sign up? 10
Posted by Hasbarabeen on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:39 | # The catalyst for civil disobedience was when Muslims in Luton insulted the local regiment, The Royal Anglicans, on their homecoming march through the town. I never knew the Established Church militant was so powerful in Blighty! Are they Queen Elizabeth’s bodyguard when she goes to Westminister Abbey? 11
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:04 | # We’ve seen mulatto societies. We don’t need to “do the experiment on ourselves,” the experiment has already been done. We’ve seen them in the Maghreb, we’ve seen them in Brazil. We’ve seen tons of individual mulattoes in white societies like the U.S. And we don’t like what we see. So that experiment has already been done, we don’t have to repeat it. As for white/Chinese mulattoes, that experiment has also already been done: look at the folk in parts of Central Asia: half-Chinese, half-white. They’re fine folk I’m sure, but we don’t want to change into that. We like the way we look and the way we act, unmixed. The Jews are the mischief-makers in all this, pushing, pushing, pushing for us to mix (only us, not themselves of course). They have allies now in the form of our white gentile élites — as to exactly how that genocidal alliance came about, we’re still scratching our heads but it certainly changes nothing: we don’t want to become racially mixed as the Jews keep pushing us to do, we want to stay what we’ve always been, which isn’t perfect by any means but we like it better than any alternative we see, such as switching to Chinese, Negro, Papuan, what-have-you — we don’t want it. How do the Jews help force this crap on places like Finland and Switzerland that hardly have any? By helping force it on the United States, which has tons, then the United States through its prestige, power, and influence helps force it on all other countries. Here’s my philosophy: if the Jews love Negroes so much let them change themselves into them and leave others alone. That’s all the philosophy I need. 12
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:07 | #
Should be: How do the Jews help force this crap on places like Finland and Switzerland that hardly have any Jews? 13
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:22 | # Let this be something one expects to see in Israel’s Knesset, not in any legislature of any white country: http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/09/the-fruits-of-progress/ , The Jews love this race so much? Good, let them immerse themselves in it. We don’t want it, Jews, and that’s addressed to the Jewish groups the ACLU, the $PLC, the ADL, the AJC, the CJC, and every other Jewish group trying to force race-change on us. Force it on yourselves, Jews, if you love it so much! Why do we have the above-linked spectacle in the Louisiana state legislature today? As the direct result of XXth-Century Jewish political activity in the United States. 14
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:28 | # A place like Switzerland with few of its own Jews is slowly heading in the same direction because of influence by the heavily-Jewish-influenced United States: the Jews are doing it to Jew-sparse European countries by the transitive law. 15
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:54 | # Hasbarabeen: I never knew the Established Church militant ... Whoops, the editor should have spotted that one! I’ll correct it, and smile along with the shade of that great soldier and Christian the late General Sir John Hackett, who declared that you will find more Christian love on a battlefield than in any bishop’s palace. 16
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:30 | # CC: How do you envision a renationalized Europe, particularly a renationalized Britain, being able to aid Whites in North America, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa secure the existence of our people given we cannot get the political ball rolling in those locales? That’s a hell of a question, CC. For a long time I rather lazily assumed that Europe was too mired in its own problems, and needed American energy and American ideas to drag itself out of the slough. It had always been the case that American culture conditioned significant aspects of European life, albeit often negatively. Nonetheless, I thought the cure for our ills could come from American empiricism. But then I began to appreciate the situation better. I realised just how much the New Right in Europe despises American empiricism, materialism, cultural imperialism, racialism, and so on. It does not want to cooperate in any way with white American racial advocacy. And up to a point it is right, since America is the expression of liberal DNA and even WNs who understood all the other issues do not understand their own philosophical parentage. Americans are liberals (philosophically, of course - I don’t mean they are blue state Dems) in a much more holistic sense than Europeans who, however much they are in the grip of modernity, always have the possibility to reflect on Time and tradition, and love for the ancient land that is all around them and which, too, is a parent. So there is a counter-balance to liberalism in Europe which is, if not entirely absent, only reflected on the North American continent. Out of this counter-balance, this earth, grow the traditionally conservative and nationalist responses to the modern. This is why Europe has seen nationalist politics develop in a way that America has not. So, given this, one is bound to broach the question with a lot of scepticism. It is possible that however far it progresses towards government on the old continent, nationalist politics may lack the agency to spark new ideological and political processes in north America (or the Antipodes - SA is a lost cause). What is the mechanism by which European nationalist/nativist party politics can act directly upon the white American psyche, amidst all that liberalism? Example alone? Is this example relevant to the life-experience and the sense of self that white Americans possess? I don’t know. That’s the problem with giving you a proper answer, CC. I wish it were otherwise. 17
Posted by Armor on Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:38 | # Paul Gottfried—> the white nationalists need a philosophy Here is another one: Alex Kurtagic Post a comment:
Next entry: The Stealth Amnesty
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Captainchaos on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:03 | #
GW,
How do you envision a renationalized Europe, particularly a renationalized Britain, being able to aid Whites in North America, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa secure the existence of our people given we cannot get the political ball rolling in those locales?