Black Volunteers for US Military Service Plummets

Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 01:24.

image

Perhaps blacks are recognizing this government is about to self-destruct and are staying home to build multi-ethnic gangs in the midwest using young, mother-raised, white boys (and girls) to do their dirty work and be their public faces.  After all, they’ll need cannon fodder when race wars break out.

Tags:



Comments:


1

Posted by Anon on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:12 | #

Good news and bad news really.  Less negroes in the military means less, stupididy, less TNB, less insubordination, etc…Unfortunately these negroes now seem free to organize some sort of urban gang/terror force.  But they seem to be intent on killing each other, at least for now(good news as well). 
Mr. Bowery, do you think that these blacks be an organized force that poses a threat in a major way?  I have not seen any evidence that Africans to be as organized as say the hispanics.  As it is, the hispanic gangs are kicking black ass in cities across the US and taking over historically black gang areas/criminal rackets.  I am not mitigating the crime that these blacks have been responsible for and will doubtless continue to be responsible for in the future against whites.  But I just do not see them as organized, more like spontaneous animal outbursts.  They also have a tendency to burn their own neighborhoods.  They could have marched to Beverly Hills during the LA riots and there was nobody, not a single squad car to stop them.  Very dangerous, but not well organized.  Of course, whites should arm themselves as quickly and as heavily as possible because well, if the blacks do go ape in your area, it will be just like a war, Yugoslavia-like, but localized.  I do not seem them able to coordinate a mass revolt in an organized manner. 
Another silver lining.  All these militarily trained whites will be great teachers for the white populace when racial strife comes, especially the Special Forces types.  One of their jobs is to teach the people how to use weapons and fight.  We will need them.
Start buying firearms and ammunition now.  Make them common calibers, 9mm, .223, 12 gauge, etc…You don’t have to spend big money for good, durable and reliable firearms.  But that is another thread.


2

Posted by Tommy G on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:33 | #

“Start buying firearms and ammunition now.  Make them common calibers, 9mm, .223, 12 gauge, etc…You don’t have to spend big money for good, durable and reliable firearms.  But that is another thread.”—by Anon

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A pistol for the bedroom,
A shotgun over the door,
A 30-06 for reaching out;
You don’t need any more.


3

Posted by Slavyanski on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 04:44 | #

““Start buying firearms and ammunition now.  Make them common calibers, 9mm, .223, 12 gauge, etc…You don’t have to spend big money for good, durable and reliable firearms.  But that is another thread.”—by Anon”


Remember folks….I’m the CRAZY one here.


4

Posted by GT on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:22 | #

Tourette’s tic:

“Remember folks….I’m the CRAZY one here.”

Yup!


5

Posted by Greg M on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:50 | #

It’s good to see that blacks are not falling for the empty promises and outright lies of the U.S. military (imperialist forces). In fact, I think that black Americans, regardless of their educational levels, are collectively much more politically astute than white Americans are. They “know the real deal”, as the old saying goes.


6

Posted by 2R on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 06:53 | #

Blacks never really liked the field very much in the Army.  I remember before the war, the blacks telling me that there was no difference between GW Bush and Saddam Hussein and that they didn’t want to go to war.  At that time, I was sort of a Neoconservative.  Maybe not a NeoCon but I definitely wanted to go to war.  Looking back, I’m glad I felt this way because going to war is hard enough but especially if you don’t want to be there.  These same blacks told me that Bush killed innocent blacks in Texas, and that they didn’t want to fight for him. 

This was the good thing about being an Infantrymen.  Very few blacks.  But the ones who were there, never liked the field.  Mestizo’s were better soldiers for sure.  The blacks liked the Army before 9-11 when we had 4 day weekends all the time.  So this doesn’t surprise me at all.  After all, they’re raised in a society that teaches them “not to fight in a White man’s Army.” 

Judea-Con Max Boot thinks its a good idea to have foreigners “earn” their citizenship by serving in the military.  This is a sure sign that you’re living in an empire.  The elites don’t care who they get to fight their wars as long as its someone besides their kids doing the dying.  These foreign soldiers will come in handy if any “civil unrest” occurs in the US.  As many of you know, Bush got rid of Posse Comitatus [sic] so the active duty military can now be used in the Continental U.S.  Its much easier to depend on Mexicans or Haitians to kill White “terrorists” when the power structure widens their “War on Terror” to a “War on Hate” once White men start opposing their displacement.


7

Posted by Al Ross on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:52 | #

Yes, Blacks know the ‘real deal’ alright.

http://niggermania.org/raptorman/rap/rap.htm


8

Posted by Robert Reis on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:14 | #

Kim du Toit webpages have excellent articles about firearms. His essay qbout the Pussification of the American male is quite funny.
Cheers,
RER


9

Posted by Slavyanski on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:06 | #

Apparently GT is a little dense.  We got people here recommending stocking up ammunition and weapons for some kind of ‘race war’(which was supposedly supposed to happen decades ago if we were to believe G.L. Rockwell), in response to an article about blacks not joining the army in large numbers-  but I have Tourette’s.  Sure.  You people are very rational. 


PS- Doesn’t it suck how your views are incredibly unpopular even with your target demographic?  Oh…but the JOOOOOOOOOZ are controlling them!


10

Posted by Slavyanski on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:17 | #

“After all, they’ll need cannon fodder when race wars break out.”

My favorite quote from this rational, enlightened, entirely sane article.  When are those ol’ race wars going to break out anyway?  Weren’t they supposed to happen in the 60s?  70s? 80s? What’s keeping them so long?

Maybe I just don’t understand because I’m “mentally unbalanced”, I have “Tourette’s”, and I’m not “awake”.


11

Posted by GT on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:53 | #

Scipio - Rest assured, if “Slavyanski” and his ilk were to gain complete control of the West and disarm its population, they would not hesitate to reintroduce the old Bolshevik method of dealing with nationalists, patriots and dissidents alike:  introduction to a lime pit via a bullet to the base of the skull!

Slavyanksit - You deserve it.

——————————————-

More of Slavyanksit’s Tourette tics:

“Remember folks….I’m the CRAZY one here.”

“Sure.  You people are very rational.”

“Doesn’t it suck how your views are incredibly unpopular even with your target demographic?”

“Oh…but the JOOOOOOOOOZ are controlling them!”

“NOOOO!!! It MUST be some kind of shadowy Jewish ‘race-replacement’ scheme”

“Do you find that there isn’t a wealth of information/entertainment that appeals to white males these days?  Have you ever heard of Fox News.”

“If I might add something- why is it so important to have a white MALE on there?”

“Is a white woman not worthy enough to represent her “race”?”

“Apparently that’s not good enough for you, and now some are claiming that this is “separating” white men from women. Pathetic”

“Now I’m too collectivist?  I thought Marxism was about some kind of extreme individualism.”

“Your sleep/awake analogy betrays a belief that you have some kind of esoteric knowledge or something.  Rather cult-like.”

“Guy in the movement lectures me about honour.  Sure.”

“These guys on here apparently hate their own women, because they don’t think they can represent their race.  Repressed homosexuality perhaps?”

“You sit around watching every advertisement and count how many whites, white males, white females with black males.  Just who has the inferiority complex here.”

“Personally I think you are afraid of females in general, and for some reason you are afraid of competing with blacks particularly.”

“Christ- it is nice to NOT be obsessed with the racial make up of ADVERTISEMENTS.”

“It is so free not to be imagining some smoky boardroom full of cackling Jews, saying “LET’S PUT THIS WHITE FEMALE IN THE AD WITH A BLACK MALE!! HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!”

“Now you may go back to calling me mentally ill, alleging that I have an inferiority complex ..”

“A lot of you people make the mistake of thinking that “appealing to white males” means appealing to you.”

“What if you see white males in an ad, but in fact, without your knowledge, they are really JOOISH?!  How diabolical!!!”

“They do not “doubt the Holocaust”, they allege that the Holocaust is a hoax designed to harm or deceive the world for some reason- hence “incitement of hatred against groups”.”

“Yeah, because whites dominate American societies- we don’t NEED a group to fight for ‘our interests’.”

“White nations are not “pressured” to accept immigrants.”

“So what, he’s an idiot.  He is talking about eliminating the social concept of “whiteness”.  I don’t want to be “white” either; I’m Irish and Ukrainian- I’m not a color.”

“Of course non-whites CAN discriminate against whites(in fact there is a lot of discrimination within the “white” population in some places like Europe. The thing is that in America at least, non-whites are not in a position of power.”

“Of course a bunch of guys in a movement that is famous for having virtually no women (and certainly no prominent women) MUST know more about feminism than a feminist herself.”

“And of course posting some radical quotes by a few identity politics nutcases is representative of the feminist ideal in the first place.”

“Appeal to nature fallacy.”

“Oh no, please debate me, start by providing credible demographics to back up that 100 million claim ..”


12

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:34 | #

Anon writes: As it is, the hispanic gangs are kicking black ass in cities across the US and taking over historically black gang areas/criminal rackets.

That’s why blacks are gravitating to what the linked article describes as “hybrid” gangs in the midwest.  In the world of multiethnic organizations we do see blacks occupy high positions of authority far more often than their average IQ would predict.  Look at the US government.


13

Posted by Anon on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:54 | #

Slavyanski,
A “war” does not have to look like WW1 or WW2, it can look like Iraq, the Occupied Territories, Yugoslavia, the car burning “riots” in France (again) or the current situation in the US. I’m not concerned with Rockwell, the 70’s or whatever was “supposed” to have happened by now.  I am concerned about now and places like Knoxville, New Orleans, Jena and the innumerable other incidents that take place every day across the US and in your town too.  Take a walk through certain neighborhoods and you have a good chance you will be fighting for your life, but sometimes though, trouble will find you as well, even in you own home.  That sure as hell sounds like war to me.  Would you walk through Baghdad, Grozny, Krajina, the Western Front or New Orleans, etc… unarmed if you had a choice? 
If you have not looked into the nature and amount of black “crime”, I suggest you do.  It goes far beyond the normal motives for crime, like money, property, etc…And you may not think that there is a war, but they certainly do.  You have a uniform that you can’t take off either, same as the rest of us.  There will be won’t any non-combatants either.  Unless you live on the moon, you will be involved like it or not. 
And I actually am crazy, but you are more than welcome to top off your magazines when the shooting starts.


14

Posted by figures27 on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:47 | #

The question is why the number of white volunteers not plumeting drastically.  Could it be that blacks are smarter than whites ?
Why would anyone voluntarily join the armed forces of evil empire US ?

As for the “race war”
What race war ? There won’t be any race war !  Whites will simply be exterminated !  (as we speak, they are being eliminated)
Which one of you knows enough white people to man a platoon of white insurgents ?  Which one of you knows of a West-Point graduate or other qualified officer that would be willing to command a company of white insurgents ?
Was it not white government, white officers, white soldiers who put an end to the independence-mindedness of the Confederate States ?
Was it not white US officers and white volunteers who went to war for the sake of mob-rule (demo-cracy) in 1917 ?  Was it not white US officers and white soldiers who went to war for the sake of marxism in 1941 ?

The communists could march out onto the streets of US millions of illegal aliens !... how many whites could you gather together ?

When Kissinger made that “stupid, dumb animals” remark, he wasn’t being rude, he was just making an observation.


15

Posted by Anon on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:37 | #

I can pretty much answer yes to some of your questions.  I know a good number of white, experienced military men, some in my own family.  You would also be surprised who lives down the street, down the hall or works with you.  The questions about WW1,WW2 and Civil War are certainly open to discussion.  But as I said, I am not concerned with what has happened, it cannot be undone, although debating about it is fun.  But maybe we should just throw in the towel and give up now. 
I respectfully ask you to take your defeatism back to your own website (which I happen to find informative, intelligent and interesting) but it is a little hard on the eyes.  If you want to give up, then fine, you are free to do so. But make that decision for yourself.


16

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:47 | #

figures27, I don’t expect there to be a race war—I expect there to be many race wars.

Some if not most of these race wars will go under different names than “race” wars but they will happen. 

Here are the circumstances that have changed since the two great suicidal wars:

1)  The “Civil War” was actually a war to abolish slavery—a violation of freedom of association.  Slavery has taken a new form as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Immigration and Nationalities Act of 1965—both violations of freedom of association targeting the enslavement of whites.

2) WW II was fought by men like my father who were deceived by centralized editorial influence on media.  The Internet is changing that rather dramatically as seen in the disconnect between what is happening on the street with the Ron Paul campaign and the portrayal of the Ron Paul phenomenon by the old media.

Whites genetically believe in freedom of association even if they can’t really articulate it.  It’s why “fair” has a double meaning.  This is why the first priority of those who are Holocaustian Supremacists is to portray white separatists as supremacists—its the only way they can get whites to kill other whites who seek merely to be left to their own territories.  The conditions that used to get whites to kill other whites—slavery and lies from centralized media—have now completely changed.


17

Posted by John on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:48 | #

To answer Greg, the real reason is the exact same problem they had in Vietnam where they exhausted the available pool of African-American recruits because when the Sargeants told them to “Get down!” they started dancing.

Seriously though, is it really political astuteness (how many blacks can even spell the word)? It could be base survival instinct coupled with a lack of bravery or loyalty and a desire for the most comfort possible. I must admit, though, whites do have a blind spot where they are patriotic when it is no longer adaptive and defies all reason. I think this “phenomenon” has to do partly with language and reification—that English and other languages lack an abstraction level marker such that we are willing to fight for shit like freedom and democracy..It’s hard to believe that there are actually still people who cling to such threadbare concepts but a large minority of the US diaspora European population still does. Since the War of Northern Aggression (where “honor” had at least some attachment to the real world) it has progressively gotten worse.

Frederick Mann’s allegory of the Two Tribes illustrates the power of what I call false substantives:

Two Tribes
Consider two different isolated tribes somewhere in the jungles of South America. Call them Tribe 1 and Tribe 2. Each has its unique language with its own structure. The language of Tribe 1 (Language 1) tends to be very literal. A man who fishes, for example, is called “man-who-fishes.” The same man, while sleeping, is called “man-who-sleeps”; while talking, “man-who-talks”; while running, “man-who-runs”; while eating, man-who-eats”; while writing, “man-who-writes”; while making a chair, “man-who-makes-chair”; while giving orders, “man-who-gives-orders”; etc. In Language 1, distinctions are made between different kinds of words: “Thing-words,” “Do-words,” “How-words,” “Story-words,” “Funny-words,” “Order-words,” “Panic-words,” “What-words,” “Who-words,” “Why-words,” “When-words,” “Where-words,” etc. High-level abstractions are rare in language 1. To the people of Tribe 1, any word that doesn’t refer to something physically perceivable, is highly suspect. Their test for reality is physical.

The language of Tribe 2 (Language 2) is very different. A man who obtains his wherewithal mostly by fishing, is called “fisherman.” (This system of nomenclature would seem absurd to the people of Tribe 1—how can you call someone a “fisherman” when he is not fishing, but sleeping?) Language 2 contains many high-level abstractions—like “happiness.” People from Tribe 2 can talk for hours about “happiness.” (To someone from Tribe 1, this would be incomprehensible—they only talk about “woman-who-is-happy” while she is happy, and “woman-who-is-sad” while she is sad. The notion that you could separate “happiness” from a real person being happy, and talk about “happiness” as if it existed by itself, would be completely unthinkable to someone from Tribe 1.)

To the people from Tribe 2, any word being used is automatically assumed to be part of existence, otherwise people wouldn’t use it. (To someone from Tribe 1, the word “existence” would be a meaningless absurdity, because in their mentality only particular objects exist.) In Tribe 2, the test for reality is agreement. If other people agree with a word and the way it seems to be used, then that word is automatically accepted as valid and useful.

One day a strange man arrives at the place where the people of Tribe 1 live. They ask him: “Who you?” He: “I King.” They: “Your name King?” He: “No; my name John.” They: “Why call self King if name John?” He: “I special person, agent of God.” They: “You look different but not special; who God?” He: “God creator of world.” They: “Where God?; How create world?” He: “God everywhere; God all-powerful.” They: “How we see God?” He: “Can’t see God.” They: “You speak crazy.” He: “No; I special; I show you.” Whereupon the stranger performs various tricks like apparently making objects appear and disappear. They: “You clever man-who-tricks.” He: “I special; I King.” They: “You speak funny; you clever John-who-tricks.” He: “I King; my word law.” They: “What law?—special word?” He: “Yes; my word law—you must obey.” They: “Ah! You mean order-word!” He: “Yes; I King; I make law.” They: “No; you speak order-word?” He: “Yes; I special.” They: “What special?—Anybody speak order-word?” He: “You not understand.” They: “No.”

Eventually John-the-stranger gives up trying to convince the people of Tribe 1 that he has a “special status” and that his words are different from the words of anyone else—so he leaves, to search for more gullible and impressionable victims elsewhere…

For many days and nights he trudges through the jungle before discovering the people of Tribe 2. They: “Who you?” He: “I King.” They: “Your name King?” He: “No, my name John.” They: “Why call self King if name John?” He: “I special person, agent of God.” They: “You look different; what God?” He: “God creator of world.” They: Where God?; How create world?” He “God everywhere; God all-powerful.” They: “Show special?” Whereupon the stranger performs various tricks like apparently making objects appear and disappear. They: “You King, agent of God.” He: “Yes, my word law.” They: “What law?” He: “Law special word of God through me; you must obey.” Whereupon the people of Tribe 2 bow down and kiss the feet of John—they do not habitually test abstractions against reality, so they readily accept John-the-stranger as their “King” and his word as “law.” Thereafter all he has to do to subjugate, control, and dominate them, is open his mouth…

“Language creates spooks that get into our heads and hypnotize us.”
—Robert Anton Wilson, Introduction to The Tree of Lies (by Christopher S. Hyatt. Ph.D.)

“It is hard to fight an enemy who has outposts in your head.”
—Sally Kempton

“The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.”
—Steve Biko

The people from Tribe 1 reject the Slavespeak words of John the would-be-terrocrat—making them impossible to subjugate, control, and dominate. To them the terrocrat is merely a clever liar and trickster.

The Tribe 2 people accept John’s word “King” to describe himself. They believe that “King” John has special powers because of the tricks he performs and because of his connection to “God.” By accepting John’s terrocrat words they automatically place him in a superior position and themselves in inferior positions. Just by accepting, believing, and using the terrocrat word “King,” they yield their power to the terrocrat—they subjugate themselves.

It’s worth emphasizing that just by accepting the concepts/words of the would-be tyrant, you place yourself at a huge disadvantage. By doing so, you relinquish your power, enabling the would-be tyrant to become an actual tyrant. Instead of laughing at his silly notions, you’ll probably end up begging him to “change the law” so you can be free. And guess who has the last laugh!


18

Posted by Red Baron on Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:34 | #

Blacks are dumb, but not necessarily stupid.


19

Posted by nat23ion on Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:31 | #

Defetism ?!
Perhaps all that reading made me a bit too realistic, but actually I am just ridiculing your race-war day-dream.  The war is going on right now and most whites do not know it, do not care.  If and when the shooting starts, it will be just to mop up.

What is the great white hope action plan ?  Where is it being carried out ?
I saw a million aliens on the streets of Chicago, could the great white race war hope gather up that many volunteers ?


question number two:
only day-dreaming is allowed ?

misguided ww2 americans ?!  no ! dumb idiots,  and most of them went to their graves believing they fought on the right side.  Whoever is left of ww2 british/american bombers, they are huffing and puffing if someone dares to mention that all they did is incinerate women and children in large cities
Today, if whites were bright as you describe/imagine them, they wouldn’t sign up for the armed forces of the US government, the government that is the enemy of white people everywhere
But let us say they were misguided in 1936, 1940, that only means that a superior intelligence misguided them….


__
the Internet is not changing anything at all, the Ron Paul fuss is a perfect example.  Anyone with half a brain should know by now that nothing good will ever come from the Republican party, that you will never get good government through election.
information and literature were always available, only no one cared, no one cares now
10 million 9/11 books/dvds were sold and all it did is made a few people rich.
How many people gave money and voted for Albert-in-the-ballance Gore ?
How many people gave money and voted for George Bush ?
What difference did the Internet make for them ?

People could have supported Howard Phillips, Michael Peroutka;  just as they could have supported for Peter Cooper, Jennings Bryan, August Lindbergh, Robert LaFollette….  What difference did the millions of pamphlets and books make ?

How many people pay money to watch gladiator shows ?  How many are joining the great white liberation war ?


20

Posted by Greg M on Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:14 | #

John,

  I just read your response to my comment. 

  I don’t think that all blacks are as politically ignorant- and cowardly and lazy as white nationalists (and other conservatives) may think. A good number of blacks have come to the conclusion that this nation and its political system do not represent their best interests. Therefore many of them are no longer interested in joining the military (no matter how good or enticing the benefits may be for them.)
(After all, why should they fight in wars that only benefit “the white man”?) 

  And whites can certainly be just as cowardly and lazy. For instance: How many obese whites are there in North America these days? Millions.  Blacks don’t have a monopoly on laziness. American anti-culture, with its emphasis on comfort and the pursuit of pleasure above all else, has produced millions of lazy, ignorant and cowardly people (of every color). Of course, the fact that much of our American “proletarian” class no longer even does much actual productive labor(many now find themselves in horrible low wage “service industry”/customer service type jobs) has obviously contributed to this epidemic of laziness and hedonism.

When there’s no hope on the horizon- and only the illusionary ladders of a capitalist economy to climb- the people on the bottom will abandon hope and become shiftless, lazy, mean, irresponsible, etc. Can you blame them?


21

Posted by snax on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:33 | #

2R -

As many of you know, Bush got rid of Posse Comitatus [sic] so the active duty military can now be used in the Continental U.S.  Its much easier to depend on Mexicans or Haitians to kill White “terrorists” when the power structure widens their “War on Terror” to a “War on Hate” once White men start opposing their displacement.

I was looking to find comments following JB’s interview of Drew Fraser where Posse Comitatus was discussed extensively, and this was the best match I found. But it’s a prescient comment from 2R there, especially if we widen the target to “War on Angry Victims of Economic Collapse.”

Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 1

3rd Infantry’s 1st BCT trains for a new dwell-time mission. Helping ‘people at home’ may become a permanent part of the active Army

—-

Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks.

... this new mission marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities.

After 1st BCT finishes its dwell-time mission, expectations are that another, as yet unnamed, active-duty brigade will take over and that the mission will be a permanent one.

“Right now, the response force requirement will be an enduring mission. How the [Defense Department] chooses to source that and whether or not they continue to assign them to NorthCom, that could change in the future,” said Army Col. Louis Vogler, chief of NorthCom future operations. “Now, the plan is to assign a force every year.”
—-

“I don’t know what America’s overall plan is — I just know that 24 hours a day, seven days a week, there are soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines that are standing by to come and help if they’re called,” Cloutier said. “It makes me feel good as an American to know that my country has dedicated a force to come in and help the people at home.”

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: The Occidental Observer
Previous entry: Message to the natives from Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:28. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 17:30. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:21. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:36. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:37. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:14. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 16 Nov 2024 17:30. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:04. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Mon, 11 Nov 2024 23:12. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Mon, 11 Nov 2024 19:02. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Nationalism's ownership of the Levellers' legacy' on Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:11. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Fri, 08 Nov 2024 23:26. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Wed, 06 Nov 2024 18:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:48. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 12:19. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 04:15. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:57. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:40. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 01 Nov 2024 23:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'The legacy of Southport' on Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:21. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Mon, 28 Oct 2024 23:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:28. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:27. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:37. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:54. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Sun, 20 Oct 2024 23:23. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Dutch farmers go where only Canadian truckers did not fear to tread' on Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:19. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve?' on Mon, 14 Oct 2024 05:59. (View)

affection-tone