Posted by Amalek on Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:47 | #

As Steve Sailer has pointed out, ‘Borat’ is not really about Kazakhstan.

rather it is an extended version of the dumb-Polack joke popularised by American Jewish comedians in the 1970s: a thinly veiled attack on the Jews’ traditional enemies among the peasantry of Eastern Europe. It was filmed in Rumania, where the villagers revived regrettable stereotypes of the gouging Hebrew middleman when they found out how much dosh the film was coining, compared with what they received for being made to look fools.

Baron Cohen, an observant Orthodox Jew and member of the inner-circle kohenim, previously mocked blacks: the ‘shvartzes’ who became unpopular when they began biting the Jewish hand that patted them on the head and steered them as an anti-white battering ram. Being a prudent sort of mensch, when he was criticised by black comedians for ‘racism’ in his Ali G character, he and his Jewish writers and producers suddenly claimed that it was a satire of ‘wiggers’, not negroes. In other words, laughing at the goyim for apeing dumb shvartzes. Being whites, and therefore nice guys, we swallowed this without protest.

Baron Cohen’s next project is a film deriding ‘Bruno’ the male model: an Austrian, and therefore another hereditary object of derision and fear for Jews. (Eichmann, Waldheim, scrubbing the pavements of Vienna and all that.)

‘Borat’ was originally portrayed as a Muslim Albanian gangster. The bold, subversive Sacha changed the nationality when some Balkan Muslims looked as if they might want a word with him. Neither does he directly satirise Islam. Too risky!

By sending Borat on a tour of America, Baron Cohen can also pour contempt (helped by heavily selective editing) on the stupid white trailer trash whose Christian Zionism is keeping the USA on side with Israel. Two hands bit for the price of one, and you can even make them buy tickets to laugh at themselves! Great business, it’s.

Asked when he would turn his satirical talents on his own people, a spokesman for Mr Baron Cohen said: ‘Ve should shit on our own doorstep ven we haf so many enemies? Only a dirty self-hating putz could sink so low!’

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:37 | #

Sailer is right, of course:  what the self-righteous, holier-than-thou Jews are doing in this Borat phenomenon is committing none other than ... (... wait for it ...) ... RACISM!

Yes, RACISM!  PREJUDICE!  BIGOTRY!  DISCRIMINATION!  of the LOWEST KIND!

Isn’t that just like the Jewish hypocrites at the SPLC, ACLU, and PDL (Pro-Defamation League) — just when you need them most they’re nowhere to be found!

Posted by Al Ross on Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:05 | #

James, the real culprit in Deliverance is surely the author, James Dickey, rather than the director. I dont know Dickey’s racial background but he volunteered twice during watime, dropping out of college in WW2 to join the army, then re-enlisting in the USAF when the Korean War started.

Anyway, it’s only fiction and many of our race possess such vast imaginative powers that characters must be created to meet the creative imperative.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Mon, 20 Nov 2006 05:20 | #

It is interesting to see how Cohen uses Borat and the Rolling Stone interview to expand the realm and thus definition of anti-Semitism.

“But to me it revealed something about that bar in Tuscon. And the question is: did it reveal that they were anti-Semitic? Perhaps. But maybe it just revealed that they were indifferent to anti-Semitism,” he said.

“I know it’s not very funny being a comedian talking about the Holocaust, but I think it’s an interesting idea that not everyone in Germany had to be a raving anti-Semite. They just had to be apathetic,” he said.

Obviously, he’s read Goldenhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners and the subsequent dismantling of DG’s thesis.  Goldenhagen argued that “the destruction of European Jewry was a predictable consequence of Germany’s widespread and virulently homicidal anti-Semitism, which was a fixture of the German social landscape long before the fall of the Weimar Republic”, yay, even until the Middle Ages. He argues that Judaism and its non-belief in the Christian Messiah, the Christ, affronted German Christianity. The Germans possessed by an anti-Semitic demon, embraced an all-consuming pathological hatred of the Jew, the other. Like Captain Ahab, obsessed by a remorseless crazed zeal they set about to avenge themselves against the cunning fiend.

He quotes Melville: “All that most maddens and torments; all that stirs up the lees of things; all truth with malice in it; all that cracks the sinews and cakes the brain; all the subtle demonism of life and thought; all evil, to crazy Ahab were visibly personified and made practically assailable in Moby Dick.”

As with Ahab and the whale, so with Germans and the Jews.

The problem was, if this hatred existed for so long, why didn’t the Germans act upon it earlier. Martin Luther revealed his contempt for the Chosen in his tome On the Jews and Their Lies. Yet four centuries passed before the obsessed Germans exacted their vengeance.

If the Germans were not possessed of some demonic madness, what then?

“[N]ot everyone in Germany had to be a raving anti-Semite. They just had to be apathetic…”
 
They were apathes-Semitic.

Posted by Honest Abe Foxman on Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:07 | #

All those Spielberg movies, all those museums, all that lecturing in schools, all those official ‘Days’ to ensure nobody ever, ever forgets the Worst Atrocity in the History of the Universe Ever… amd those schmucks are ‘indifferent’??!!!

My friends, we must thank Sacha for showing us how essential it is to redouble our efforts so that every American worthy of the name laments the Holocaust at least once a day, preferably before breakfast. After all, in a very real sense it was the USA’s fault. And Britain’s. And France’s. (And oh yes, maybe Germany had something to do with it too, but they’re paying up.)

Posted by who on Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:03 | #

Once again a Jew gets one over on the “Majority Rights” crew and they can’t take it.

Hey Jim, I thought Dickey did an excellent job of showing Scotch-Irish like they were back in their homeland; crude, barbaric, and with a minimal amount of culture.

Posted by Top on Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:01 | #

The more I read about the reactions to Borat, the more I realize how the vast majority of white people are absolutely removed from the reality of the racial dynamics unfolding within their countries.  For example, almost no one I know personally, including East Europeans and US Southerners, are able to correctly label the Borat movie as a stereotype against Slavs and the white southerners.  Instead, they all focus on Sacha Baron’s depiction of ‘how things are’ and his ‘clever’ moral exposure of racist Slavs and US southerners -> and by that extension all white people.  Then they think that by thinking this way, they arrived at some great insight, and are somehow part of some anti-racist ‘in-crowd’.  I.E. because ‘no one else’ got upset at those ‘ignorant’ comments that Baron finds, then that makes them the ‘moral’ ones, and it becomes their mission to hold back the great tide of the ‘white racism’ all around them.  All those white knights – riled up by that wise, clever, clever Borat!  What they don’t grasp at all is the degree to which they are targeted and conditioned to have this exact reaction by people who could care less about them.

And if whites get morally riled up by Borat and Bruno, then non-whites get absolutely energized by this stuff.  They are ready to invade Alabama and put every ‘racist’ redneck six feet under.  I have heard some of the most vile comments from non-whites after seeing some of these skits.  Have you ever noticed how non-whites are conditioned to have an extreme, almost violent reaction to this type of stuff?  What kind of a monster are we creating here?  Non-whites are already convinced of their moral superiority over ‘rednecks’ and other media targeted whites – and these media propaganda techniques are not letting up.  It has come to the point where many non-whites are ready to use extreme, violent methods to settle disputes with whites that step out of line.  This is our current reality!

Where it gets really difficult for me is in the following.  I try to imagine for a minute that an East-European or a US southerner made a movie in which he pretended he was a Jew and then used that as a cover to uncover Jewish stereotypes – for example in Israel (against Arabs) or in the US big cities (against ‘rednecks’).  I try to imagine him going to an Israeli village and making jokes about how they drink horse’s piss and screw their sisters.  I try to imagine him interviewing a bunch of jewish boys making comments about rednecks and then holding a conference in which in a southern accent he denounces it as morally wrong while going back to his ‘human-rights’ foundation to further monitors Jewish activists.  The problem is that when I (and I am very open minded when it comes to these things) try to imagine it, my thought-process gets jumbled up, and I realize with some degree of horror that I have been conditioned to believe that this scenario is impossible!  In some fundamental way we live in a Matrix-like, hypnotic reality.  We are only allowed to be the targets – we are truly the weak ones.

As a population group we have not grasped the power of information over us.  They are isolated pockets of enlightenment, but the majority is still walks, talks, eats, and sleeps within a cultural structure that is subtly, but aggressively designed to attack them.  The more the majority talks about stopping ‘hate’, the more the hate gets targeted at them.  What movies like Borat teach us is that for the vast majority of the white population, their whole moral world is mislabeled, and that we – those who care about survival of the west – absolutely and without question need to work towards creating the right labels, especially when it comes to morality.

Posted by Al Ross on Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:03 | #

I lived in Scotland for years and didnt hear of any Jews being treated in the way in the way of that unfortunate Swede.

However, she should have stayed home and minded her own business. After all Sweden has plenty of Muslims who can go to Israel and protest the fate of their co-religionists, unless of course their being absent from the country means that their untrustworthy relatives would have to collect the welfare cash.

When you hear the words ‘Israeli extremists’, always remember that they are simply saying out loud and acting out what the ‘silent majority’ also believes.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:49 | #

Top’s got the basics down.

Posted by Amalek on Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:09 | #

Sharp remarks, from a reader of Steve Sailer’s blog, about Baron Cohen’s boast that he had revealed redneck Americans’ ‘indifference’ to the Sacred Shoah:

I didn’t realize that apathy is best revealed through careful staging, audience prep, video recording, and editing of the results. Is Cohen really such a pedantic git that he thinks getting a bunch of drunken revelers to sing “Throw the Jew down the well” is proof of Western indifference about anti-Semitism? It’s not even an indictment of country-western bars. (Cohen knows very well that it would be easier, not harder, to get an audience of Jesse Jackson supporters to sing that refrain. But this would make the urban sophisticates who howl with glee at this “transgressive” comedy very sad, so that’s right out.)

Sailer adds:

The critics are claiming to be outraged that the Americans in the film who were exposed to Borat’s anti-Semitism and anti-Gypsyism in private didn’t denounce him to his face. Instead, they tended to be polite and tried to change the subject. In contrast, almost none of critics have mentioned Baron Cohen’s extremely public anti-Slavism. Complete apathy reigns over Baron Cohen’s revival of traditional goyishe kop attitudes toward Slavs. As Lenin said, the ultimate question remains “Who? Whom?.” And everybody wants to be on the side of the Who, not the Whom.

‘Borat’ is one more attempt to cement—this time through contemptuous laughter—a de facto alliance between the cognitive elite of whites and other high-IQ races and the Jews: all the better to keep the pogrom-prone masses in their place. Sacha will induce you smart liberal goyim to despise the ignorant bigots of what you used to think of as your own race. You too can become a rootless cosmopolitan, an honorary Chosenite.

Posted by Bo Sears on Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:54 | #

Baron Cohan is a low-life, and there is only one more point that can be added to the very insightful comments above.

What has changed in Cohen’s style of presentation (compared to past and similar hate caricatures) is that his is a totally aggressive presentation without a hint of passive-aggressive psychology.

Cohen’s co-ethnics, the non-Arabic Semites, achieved their rise within the structures of American life through the adoit application of passive-aggressive psychology. We European Americans seem to be particularly submissive to the passive-aggressive approach, but Cohen clearly believes he may conduct his portion of the campaign of defamation against Europeans and European Americans in a completely aggressive way.

We think this is evidence of the supremacy mindset skidding out of control, and I’ll bet more people thought more deeply about the hateful mind of Cohen that they would have if the vignettes he presented were about his suffering and his people’s woes. Cohen just let it all hang out. His tribalists and kin in Hollywood will undoubtedly shower him with praise, but this film will have consequences in waking people up.

Posted by Emma Regina on Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:38 | #

What are they about (briefly.)

Posted by Amalek on Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:09 | #

Bo: You only have to compare ‘Borat’ with the all-American Andy Hardy picture of smalltown life which the Jewish studio bosses of Hollywood propagated in the 1930s, when they were still struggling for complete acceptance as part of the US power structure.

Louis B Mayer (a Republican) and other moguls adored these films, and went out of their way to cosset the Christian audience by positive portrayals of religion and ‘family values’ in US life. They welcomed Production Code censorship; as the industry became more Jewish in ownership, it became less libertine in subject matter. A far cry from the subversive peddling of social liberalism, the sniping and outlawing of faith that Jewish media men and lawyers go in for now.

The pre-war Jews of Hollywood even moved their Sabbath to Sunday to fit in. They changed their names and altered their noses. They tried to keep the left-wing creative talent’s pro-communist and anti-Nazi messages out of their movies, and largely succeeded until 1939 when Warner Brothers broke the silence with ‘Confessions of a Nazi Spy’, starring Edward G Robinson (r/n Goldenberg) as the spybuster.

In 1934 Hollywood tycoons were instrumental in defeating Upton Sinclair’s socialist run for Governor of California. They produced fake newsreels showing hairy Bolsheviks endorsing Sinclair. Imagine such an intervention today!