Posted by Drone captures arson of refugee shelter in Finland on Thu, 03 Dec 2015 17:12 | #

Drone footage shows arson of would-be refugee shelter in Finland:
https://www.rt.com/in-motion/324340-arson-attack-finland-fire-refugees/

Posted by Jez Turner/ Andrew Brons on Thu, 03 Dec 2015 17:49 | #

Jez Turner/ Andrew Brons:

http://www.radioaryan.com/2015/11/british-renaissance-jez-turner-and.html

Posted by She moved through the fair on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:34 | #

Cara Dillon & Solas - She moved through the fair

Posted by praxis negotiates insufficent liberation from Jews on Sun, 06 Dec 2015 11:12 | #

What transformed Hitler from boring, marginalized figure into one of history’s most charismatic speakers?

The Daily Kenn lays out some interesting facts, but reaches a mistaken conclusion from those facts - that “one should not look at Nazi Germany as a Zionist conspiracy because that is a mistaken tendency to blame all Jews as all powerful evil conspirators, when in fact ‘THE’ problem is in Marxism and other mistaken ideologies.” The problem is that Kenn is falling for some Jewish red capes. That “it is absurd to believe that Hitler’s actions all boil down to the machinations of Zionist conspirators; and it is absurd to blame every last Jew. In fact, the problem is with mistaken ideologies, prominently, Marxism” which Kenn frequently refers to as “the left.”

Not quite. While we must not let ourselves be made to look absurd by advancing Jewish planted conspiracy theories that Hitler was a puppet on the strings of Zionist conspirators; or that every Jew had equal punishment and deserves equal guilt; neither should we go after the Jewish red cape that the problem is all in “the left.”

1. A Zionist motive could have been equally shared by Jews and anti-Jews alike. But that does not mean that it was an all explanatory conspiracy of which Hitler took part or was subject to as a mere puppet. Nevertheless, these motives make sense and apparently had at least partial power and influence in the events that occurred.

2. That some Jews were more culpable than others or more targeted than others is theoretical child’s play for Majorityrights by now (see the discussion of horizontal transmission). Theoretically, it is handled by separatism, as opposed to “killing all Jews.”

3. It is valid to blame Marxism significantly, as Kenn does, but not to accept it as representative of “the left” in relation to Whites as he also designates it. It represents Jewish imposed liberalism for Whites. Just like the other two conspiracy theories that he wants to dismiss - a) that Hitler was a puppet on Zionist strings and b) it was all the fault of all Jews, who are all powerful people - these theories are proposed to make the semi-ambiguous and semi-conscious but very real patterns of evolutionary biology look ridiculous by making them didactic - exaggerating them as the narrow explanation of everything to the point that the whole topic seems ridiculous.

To argue against “racism” and to pin all blame on “the left” as Kenn does, is to fall for a trap set by Jews as well, albeit a deeper one, to have us arguing against racial organization, unionization, and instead on behalf of liberalism - i.e., the dissolution of racial classification and bounds for the supervention of individual, marginal and outgroup interests.

Relatively intelligent people who apply analysis to look for overly precise solutions to these problems are particularly susceptible to fall for these Jewish tricks.

That is because events, social interactions, such as WWII, emerge though evolutionary biology in the necessarily contingent and semi- conflicted world of praxis (biological, social) interaction, not in the realm of pure theory, perfectly calculated conspiracy in full regard. 

However, despite his conclusions which lack the sufficient feel of the mutedness of praxis, Kenn does draw upon some significant facts which can provide for a better understanding through the purview of evolutionary biology.

First, let’s look at the facts that Kenn lays out:

What transformed Hitler ...into one of history’s most charismatic speakers?

The answer can be found in the name of Erik Jan Hanussen. Hanussen was a noted performer known for his uncanny ability to entrance audiences with his stage presence. He literally billed himself as a hypnotist.

Hitler recruited Hanussen to become his personal speech coach. It was Hanussen who reputedly taught Hitler the power of performance. When we watch and listen to the provocative speeches of Hitler at the Nuremberg rallies, we are watching the handiwork of Hanussen.

Though Hanussen (born Hermann Steinschneider) pretended to be a Dutch aristocrat he was, in fact, a Moravian Jew.

What Jew was an early confidant and remained close to Hitler until the end?

Upon formation of the notorious SS (Sturmstaffel) Adolf Hitler became member no. 1, member no. 2 was the lesser known Emil Maurice. Maurice remained a close confidant of Hitler from the time they met in 1919 to the end of Hitler’s life.  When Hitler was sentenced to Landsberg prison after the famed Beer Hall Putsch, Maurice was incarcerated along with him. It was there that Maurice dictated portions of Hitler’s Mein Kempf, and upon their release, it was Maurice who smuggled the manuscript out of prison.

The loyalty of Maurice to Hitler earned the former the role of the Fuhrer’s personal driver. He was one of two men to hold that position. When Hitler allegedly committed suicide in his bunker at the end of World War II, Maurice was there. Maurice was assigned the task of retrieving gasoline to pour over the bodies of Hitler and his newly wed spouse Eva Braun moments after their suicides.

Add to that at least 30 high-ranking officers with Jewish heritage in the Weirmacht.

The fact that NS Germany officially advocated the formation of Israel.

Haim Arosoloff, negotiated the Haavara agreement to allow some Jews to emigrate to Palestine in 1933, was of course a Jew; had also dated Magda Goebbels prior to his marriage to Joseph Goebbels. As the war neared its end, Himmler lamented in his diary that Hitler had allowed too many Jews to live in Berlin.

The 250,000 Jews who emigrated to Palestine between 1929 and 1938 included a massive number of professionals, doctors, lawyers and professors from Germany who emigrated with Hitler’s blessing. The migration resulted in Palestine having the highest per-capita population of doctors in the world.

This all makes sense by way of evolutionary biology - a co-evolution with and against Jews and Jewish ideas - contingent and partly finished interactive responses manifesting more or less semi-consciously through Hitler’s conflicted entanglement with Jews and European populations. By talking in terms of evolutionary biology and its reactions, I am not relying on the idea that Hitler was partly Jewish. I am talking about the biological relations and the interplay of ideas, some of which were shared interests and abstract ideals of Jews.

Though contestable as to how much these figures influenced Hitler’s actual world view and practices, it is less speculative to consider the proposition that Jewish views did have at least some considerable influence on his worldview and methods of realization.

When you add the other Jewish people among the Nazis, its friend enemy lines that included the escape of elite Jews, it emerges more plausible that Jewish motives had some underlying influence in Hitler’s outlook and the manifestation its world view reflected in important respects (as Guessedworker argues).

In consideration of how we, as normal White men, feel about White mudsharks, one can understand a strong motivation among Jewish elites - they could have contempt for Jews who’d remain in Germany and Europe, susceptible to interbreeding with Germans and other Europeans. They could want those Jews to be killed (or at least not care about it) in order to instigate purifying, Zionist in-gathering.

Jews would also have no qualms about Europeans killing each other.

That is not to say that Hitler was a mere puppet for Jews, but that fundamental epistemological planks in his world view could have been errant to European EGI (ethnic genetic interests) because they were influenced by Jewish worldviews and reaction to it, particularly if you look at its happening through semi-conscious evolutionary biological manifestation.

While The Daily Kenn has put together some interesting facts, the conclusion that “anti-antisemitism is dumb” is considerably off the mark. On the contrary, the evolutionary biological perspective finds that Hitler and his adherents were insufficiently separated and liberated from Jews and Jewish thinking.

By contrast, we seek full autonomy from Jews.

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:28 | #

A purer version of She Moved Through the Fair by Anne Briggs, from 1963:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dyUsXgL7ow

... and the development by Fairport Convention with the great Sandy Denny:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hb43-Q70olM

Fairport’s 11-minute masterpiece A Sailor’s Life, which effectively ended the suzerainty of modern folk by the culture of critique (aka the protest song):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szrGtFxtWXU

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:06 | #

Daniel,

Obviously, full autonomy from Jews requires that our children are born into a thought-world emergent from our nature, and not from the Jewish nature (in so much as a commonality of nature exists within the different Jewish ethnicities).  As you are very well aware, we sons of Europa have not had autonomy in the north for 800 years, in the east a thousand years, and in the west fifteen hundred.  We will not do so until the riddle of how to generate an authentic (that, is, ethno-religious but individually realising) exercise of the trait of faith is resolved.

Yes, National Socialism was substantially Judaic.  One recognises in respect to Aryan supremacism that it was predicated on Nietzsche.  But then Judaism got there a couple of millenia earlier and, anyway, the Fuhrer Principle and the Thousand Year Reich are pure Judaism.  The neat, new uniforms - those of the SS more than any - were not just a product of the militarisation of German society (the militarisation itself was the binding of the volk to a single volk-destiny).  The uniforms were the NS equivalent of circumcision in a dispensation in which Destiny had replaced G-d, and licensed all things.  “Look at us,” they said, “we are the Jews now.”

The only two really interesting questions which arise in respect to NS are:

(i) To what extent is the casting down of the Jew and the raising up of the “Aryan” an answer to the wrong question?  Indeed, what is the question of our time unless it is: How do we secure the existence of our people and a white future for our children?  Is our cause destining power or life itself?  When does the pursuit of power cease to be the servant of life, and become a cause unto its own self?

(ii) Is the pursuit of power without confines the only way to create action in our people?

Posted by Friedrich The Great on Sun, 27 Dec 2015 23:34 | #

Friedrich The Great Documentary

Perhaps a little bit too favorable an estimation of Friedrich the Great in this documentary.

The militarism of Prussian culture is questionable.

Its policies toward its neighboring nations questionable as well.

The baroque of San Souci is hideous, though he also manifested some good taste in music and art as well.

Undoubtedly he had many good ideas of statecraft - the anti-Machiavelli would be a step in the right direction.

Though his, the Prussian brand of military culture, ethnocentrism, elitism, disdain for things eastward and sights to expand in that direction at the expense of others obviously influenced Hitler to the very end - in the end to everybody’s detriment.

It is understandable that the Allies would diagnose it as a source of inter-European wars and seek to proscribe it as such.

San Souci..

Proof that there was a holocaust: countless poodles murdered

Posted by NPR on Mein Kampf's re-pubication on Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:56 | #

re-publication of Mein Kampf from NPR’s (Jewish) perspective:

http://pd.npr.org/anon.npr-mp3/npr/fa/2016/01/20160114_fa_01.mp3