Posted by Braveheart on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 13:40 | #

In Brussels the Moslems are systematically destroying the French-speaking school system. But the French-speaking socialists, who politically dominate the French-speaking community, don’t do anything about it. The only thing that counts for them is not to put the slightest obstacle in their way…as long as they vote French-speaking socialist.

Appointment in hell.

Flanders,

Posted by Andrew L on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:34 | #

Andrew Bold had done a report on the school last year, whilst himself and a collegue, witnessed the class and the Moslem behaviour.
But nobdy wants to know the truth, they still continue insulting and threatening the victims (Australians) as if it is their racist views and continue persicution of such groups.LIE
Sophie Panoppolis , MP for Indi is a breath of fresh air with her Views, she has BACK BONE.
Police are long gone, it is military intervention or Malitia, ether way, Governments have lost control and are in denial,(deliberat act.) The whole population can not be wrong. So we suffer or we do something about it, and I know which way I vote.Nothing they do is a Covert act, No, it is in the open and in the public domane, with appologysts in the fifth column following. You do not need to be religious to see the truth, more so when it stabbs or shoots you. No such thing as a dead hero, can’t win many wars if you are dead.That is the bleightant truth of this Multiculturalism The National Murderous policy, The international scurge.Deal with it.

Posted by AD on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:21 | #

What frustrates me is that all of these things are only being ‘exposed’ in the wake of September 11,Bali and London.As if some vague threat of terrorism is the worst we have to worry about regarding the whole concept of multiculturalism.

12 years ago,there were constant brawls between my school(catholic) and a public school(90% arab muslim) which resulted in numerous stabbings and one fatality.This tension has existed since i started school,but no matter who provoked the violence,we would always be blamed for being the ‘racist’ aggressors by the teachers,police and media.

Now that ‘terrorism’ is the word of the day,everyone is making a fuss about integration.Many who have grown up in post-1985 Sydney have already suffered worse things than ‘terrorism’.

Excuse us if we don’t give a damn now the threat is effecting those who used to scorn us for fighting back.They’ve figured out that multiculturalism doesn’t work,now they only have to take another decade to figure out that ‘assimilation’ doesn’t work either.

Posted by John S Bolton on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:30 | #

It is difficult to reason effectively using the term multiculturalism, which is why I use the terms pro-diversity and diversity valorization. In terms of pro-diversity one can reason the more readily, as to diversity of behavior, diversity of terrorism, diversity of ability levels, and so on, as being valued univocally when they ought not to be. Monoculturalism vs. multiculturalism sets up a false dilemna, which is further driven off from reality by gross equivocation. Diversity of stamp collectors is of very different value significance from diversity of terrorist movements.

Posted by John S Bolton on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:50 | #

It shouldn’t take them ten years, or even ten minutes to realize that attempted assimilation of hostiles, or congenital low conceptual ability populations, is ineffectual for the most part. It should not take them any time at all, if there has long been a consensus that forced assimilation, like what was attempted with aboriginals, is impractical and immoral.

Posted by AD on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:15 | #

Andrew Bold had done a report on the school last year, whilst himself and a collegue, witnessed the class and the Moslem behaviour.

Andrew Bolt also believes that only if they hang around real Aussies enough,they will come to love Australia and integrate.I’ve seen how they ‘integrate’ and would,quite frankly,prefer that they didn’t.Bolt,like most Liberal Party supporters,is the false opposition.

He is anti-Australian,because he denies our heritage,which is the White Australia Policy.That policy is as important to the foundation and development of our nation as the founding fathers are to the USA and the whole idea of aliyah is to Israel.We don’t need to explain,debate or justify what we want in any other way.

If the W.A.P is ‘extreme’,then so is the very existence of Australia.

Posted by AD on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:37 | #

It shouldn’t take them ten years, or even ten minutes to realize that attempted assimilation of hostiles, or congenital low conceptual ability populations, is ineffectual for the most part. It should not take them any time at all, if there has long been a consensus that forced assimilation, like what was attempted with aboriginals, is impractical and immoral.

That is the problem.We have two sides fighting for two similarly ridiculous ideas.One argues for mass assimilation,as if people from anywhere can just magically transform into us,the other argues that this shouldn’t happen,but we should still import these non-assimilables for the sake of balkanising,as if it were a virtue.

Anyone outside that sphere of useless debate is an ‘extremist’.

The aboriginal question is used to justify mass multiculturalism,as if it were the aboriginal nature of Australia that drew all of the post WW2 immigrants.The case for aboriginal self determination,which i do believe in,is either slammed by pseudo-conservatives or used by others to justify totally separate issues.

Posted by AD on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:20 | #

Re:Bolt,see one of the oldish articles on Mark’s site on him for a good explantion of that right wing lib mentality.

nb:ofcourse,saying that i endorse Mark’s views on things doesn’t suggest he endorses mine.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:57 | #

“of course, saying that I endorse Mark’s views on things doesn’t suggest he endorses mine.” 

I endorse yours, AD.

Posted by AD on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:26 | #

Thanks,i knew you did,Fred ‘McVeigh’ Scrooby.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:32 | #

McVeigh?  Well ... I wouldn’t go that far ... but I do endorse your stuff, AD.  Keep up the excellent work!

Posted by AD on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:55 | #

nb:If Abe Foxman is trolling here,the use of the jibe ‘McVeigh’ was done in a comedic context.Please do not ‘call for’ an inquiry into MR.com or Fred <strike>‘Grand Wizard’</strike> Scrooby.

Posted by Mark Richardson on Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:47 | #

If the W.A.P. is extreme, then so is the very existence of Australia.

True. But as you would know, AD, all logic is gone when it comes to the White Australia policy - it’s spoken about in hushed terms as some terrible evil, rather than as a normal immigration policy for a country seeking to maintain its national identity.

BTW, AD, I’ve enjoyed reading your comments at MR. I particularly like to get the Sydney view, not just because it’s the largest city but also because it’s the frontline of Australian multiculturalism.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 02 Sep 2005 03:01 | #

“all logic is gone when it comes to the White Australia policy - it’s spoken about in hushed terms as some terrible evil, rather than as a normal immigration policy for a country seeking to maintain its national identity.”  (—Mark)

What’s that vice called where a mediocre person shows an excessive degree of humility, a degree warranted solely by the highest superiority?  In this vein there was that funny anecedote about the guy who was the recipient of an award for this or that, who showed such an excess of humility at the microphone in his acceptance speech that someone told him to ease up on the humility because “frankly, you’re not that good!” 

These white people who run around avoiding being “racist” so fastidiously, in a world where the worst white racist in history wasn’t a patch on your typical average non-white person walking around today, where every single non-white country in the world has a racial/immigration policy more “racist” than the WAP which these fasitdious whites talk about in embarrassed whispers—these white people are like the mediocre individuals who see themselves as so superior they affect to show a laughable excess of humility at the microphone:  someone needs to shout at them, “Frankly, you’re not that good!”

These creepy white people, these pale awkward dull-minded sad depressed narrow-minded superficial oh-so-liberal creeps with limp wrists and moist palms, these overly masculine, overbearing women who don’t know their place and don’t know how to be feminine and these overly effeminate men who don’t know theirs and don’t know how to assert themselves as men, these really-and-truly pathetic “men” and “women” who frustrate each other with their mutual inadequacies, these insufferable snobs who are dull as death at cocktail parties because of having no thoughts and no conversation, these exceedingly dumb perennial best-seller readers who think they know everything and know nothing, have no idea—not the slightest—what the non-white world all around them is like.  They haven’t a clue.  It would eat them alive—and probably someday will, if their feebleminded, faux-humble crap keeps up much longer.  Assholes!

Posted by Mark Richardson on Fri, 02 Sep 2005 05:35 | #

Fred,

An absolutely sizzling characterisation of a certain kind of Westerner. 10/10.

And your observation that “every single non-white country in the world has a racial/immigration policy more “racist” than the WAP which these fasitdious whites talk about in embarrassed whispers” is true.

The policy had its intended effect of preventing mass immigration from non-Western countries. But it was not implemented in a severe way.

For instance, existing Chinese businesses were allowed to sponsor additional workers from China (who could stay for 7 years) and Chinese students were allowed into Australia but only for a maximum of 6 years or until age 24. In all about 1000 Chinese came to Australia in this way between 1901 and 1939.

In other words, the system allowed Chinese to study and trade in Australia but effectively discouraged permanent residence.

I remember reading an account of one of these Chinese visitors in the early years of the 1900s. He was surprised at the hospitality of Australians toward him, as Westerners in his part of China were regularly referred to as “white devils”.

There is nothing for Australians to be ashamed about regarding the WAP - as Fred says, it was a mild policy compared to the immigration policies of most Asian countries today and it was motivated by the natural desire of Australians to preserve themselves as a distinctive ethny.

Posted by Andrew L on Fri, 02 Sep 2005 23:36 | #

Sack the Department of Multicultural Affairs, and introduce Australian Affairs, a simple step but worth considering, Stephane’s Idea, and she has a great mind.

Posted by Wetten on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:56 | #

similar things are happening here, there are schools in Berlin for example WITHOUT a single german student, not 1 !!