Hyperbolic Neo-Liberal Immigration Policy Misnamed “Leftist” By YKW Media (Be Even More Afraid)

Posted by Guest Blogger on Sunday, 07 December 2014 06:11.

dieleft
Die Linke’s parliamentary leader Gregor Gysi. Photo: DPA

Its egregious intentions betray its egregious misnomer as “The Left” by the YKW media. Whereas a White Left would be a union of the entire nation of native peoples and thus organized in entirety against immigrant imposition - these workers and beneficiaries being the theoretical equivalent of scabs - and the consequences of elite betrayal. Accordingly, a true European Nationalist Left would not be of just one class, say the workers, let alone be in representation of scabs (foreigners) - as the latter in particular would be defined properly not as The Left but rather as a Neo-Liberal concern imposed on the classification of native national interests. The reason for the misnomer is plain, the YKW and the sell-outs, particularly of the international corporatist order, do not want us to be clear in the organizational concern of that union, which is a merging, in fact an overlap, of the class with native nationalism. Instead they want it associated with what is most repugnant to our interests.

The YKW and corporate elite sell-outs are aligned in this perversion of class interests - you can be even more afraid now as they obligingly ask:

“What does the Left Party want for Europe?”

The “Left Party” (wink), read “neo-liberal” and ask rather, what union of your interests do they represent - i.e., how are they a leftist union for you as a native European? Particularly when they advocate (hyerpbolic) neo-liberal policies as such?

“Die Linke is now the third biggest group in the German parliament, but what do their politicians want for Europe?”

Gysi pretends the leftist, denouncing the The EU for “pursuing ‘neo-liberal’ policy:”

“Die Linke overtook rivals the Greens ... to become the country’s third biggest parliamentary group – and has since made waves in foreign policy by its outspoken condemnation of US spying and conciliatory attitude to Russia’s actions in Ukraine.

Their charismatic parliamentary leader Gregor Gysi added to his party’s critical stance towards the EU system in an interview with Die Zeit newspaper. ‘It is pursuing a neo-liberal economic policy and stands for the opposite of socialism,’ he said.”

But then his party pursues this policy on immigration -

“Mobility and Immigration

Die Linke’s policy on immigration stands out from major parties by appearing dramatically in favour of making Europe more refugee-friendly.

They claim to promote the ‘unconditional right to stay and proper accommodation, social protection and equal rights for all refugees.’

And according to their manifesto, they also support refugees’ free choice of which country they wish to seek asylum in, as well as demanding the dissolution of EU border agency Frontex.”

You can’t get much more neo-liberal than that.

What does that have to do with the unionized representation of native European national interests?

We hear nothing representing the unionized interests of native European nationals in YKW media. Our interests are ignored and obfuscated beginning with the very terms, with the deliberately confusing mis-designation of neo-liberal policy - immigration and non-native imposition in particular - as “The Left.” By contrast, designating the proper representation of native European national interests as The White Left is to distinguish it from the liberal and Jewish affectations imposed on native European nationalist interests by The Red Left.

http://www.thelocal.de/20140514/what-do-die-linke-want-for-europe

gysisoviet
Gysi in his Soviet permutation
——————————————————————————
More past wind across the German border from “The Left”:

</p><p>

“The greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another. The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes, natives and immigrants, Christians and Muslims and Jews, cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down!”

Tags: Anti-racism, Cultural Marxism, European Nationalism, European Union, Genetics & Human Bio-Diversity, Immigration, Immigration and Politics, Journalism, Linguistics, Political analysis, That Question Again

Comments:

Posted by Gregor Gysi on Sun, 07 Dec 2014 10:01 | #

Gregor Gysi (German pronunciation: [ˈɡiːzi]; born 16 January 1948) is a German attorney and key politician of the political party The Left (Die Linke), a party which emerged from the old East German communist party, the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED). [1]

He belonged in the SED’s reformist camp at the time of the pro-democracy transition inspired by former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. He has strongly denied allegations that he used to help the Stasi - the East German secret police. He was the last leader of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany, and led the effort that transformed it into the post-Communist Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS), forerunner of The Left.

His rhetoric has been characterized as effective, even when it serves a controversial agenda.[2]

Family background

Gysi was born in East Berlin, Soviet Zone of Germany. His father, Klaus Gysi, was a high-ranking official in East Germany, and had been Minister of Culture from 1966 to 1973. His mother, Irene, was the sister of political activist Gottfried Lessing, who was married to the British writer and Nobel Laureate Doris Lessing during his exile in Southern Rhodesia. The surname “Gysi” is of Swiss-German origin.[3] Both of his parents were of part Jewish ancestry; his paternal grandmother was Jewish, as was one of his maternal great-grandfathers.[3][4] One of his maternal great-grandmothers was Russian.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Gysi

Posted by Question Time on Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:06 | #

Question Time: Nigel Farage and Russel Brand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXKQ6eeyhhU

Posted by IndividualityVsIdentity on Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:58 | #

Interesting contrast drawn by author, viz. between individuality and identity

What we are discussing here is something fundamentally different from the atomized individual of modernity. It is Identity, and is to be considered antithetical to individuality, which is a rejection of Identity.

http://www.radixjournal.com/journal/2014/12/30/individuality-and-its-consequences

Posted by Sweden'sNightmare on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 06:03 | #

Sweden’s catastrophically imposed liberalism:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk4uDNSPlXE

Called “the left” in this video, one might ask, how does this reflect a union of Swedes, i.e. a Swedish Left? It doesn’t, it is just the opposite; it is right-wing and Jewish skull-duggery combined.

Posted by Pegida Speech on Sun, 01 Feb 2015 14:00 | #

Pegida speech:

http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-continuation-of-germany.html

Good evening Leipzig!

My name is Götz Kubitschek, it is my honour to speak to you tonight, and before answering the question for what we have been demonstrating tonight I want to stress three points:

What we are doing tonight is something perfectly normal. We are worried about our homeland’s future, and we take to the streets because parliaments and editorial offices do not care about our worries.

What we are doing tonight is something courageous. It’s not quite a piece of cake to make head against Leipzig’s violent Leftist thugs.

What we are doing tonight is an example for all of Germany. Be assured: Behind each of you there are a thousand citizens from all parts of Germany. A thousand that cannot be in Leipzig tonight. Thousands are watching us on the web. We thank RUPTLY.TV for the live stream.

Leipzig is setting a good example. All of you are setting a good example.

I would like to add a point: What we are doing tonight is something perfectly justified. It is our constitutional right to take to the streets, to hold demonstrations and to demand changes. This right has been denied to the Dresden people on Monday. There has been an Islamist death threat. [Note: on January 19th, the weekly PEGIDA rally in Dresden had been cancelled due to a terrorist threat; N.W.]

LEGIDA: flying the flag

I do not know who of you have been present in Dresden already. I have been there five times and have not heard any anti-Islam hate mongering in a single speech given there.I have also read the Dresden agenda and have not found the slightest anti-Islam hate mongering in there either.

But I also listened carefully to the politicians during the recent weeks and months: Hannelore Kraft of SPD [Social Democratic Party, Minister-President of North Rhine-Westphalia] said about PEGIDA: ‘Those who attend those rallies must realize what kind of pied pipers they are following.’

Lorenz Caffier of CDU [Christian Democratic Union, Minister of the Interior of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania] said that all these manifestations were about nothing but ‘hate mongering and defamation.’

And Thomas Oppermann of SPD [Chairman of the SPD Parliamentary Group] spoke out most explicitly: ‘Those manipulators must be fought.’ Now what did Thomas Oppermann mean by that? Does that not sound like a hint for possible assassins? Such politicians are intellectual instigators.

To me, the shocked faces of our politicians now professing the right to demonstrate look cheap and mendacious.

Yesterday, a friend from my village told me: ‘I am a craftsman – politicians are just blabbermouths.’ I promised him to make use of that word tonight.

Angela Merkel [CDU, Chancellor of Germany], Thomas Oppermann, Wolfgang Thierse [SPD, former president of Bundestag] and other blabbermouths should have been attending the threatened Dresden rally in the front row – not necessarily for PEGIDA’s claims, but for PEGIDA’s right to demonstrate.

Now what claims am I talking about? For what did we take to the streets in Leipzig tonight? I can bring it down to a single, simple sentence. A slogan that was already bravely called out in Leipzig 25 years ago: ‘We are the people!’

All of us here are part of the German people, and the Basic Law [the Federal Republic of Germany’s costitutional law] states that this people and no one else holds the power in this country. ‘All state authority is derived from from the people,’ that is how it is written down in the Basic Law.

All politicians, all state officials, all judges, all policemen have been elected or put in charge by the people and for the people. They are there for us, not we for them! They are there to defend and to foster the welfare of this people, our welfare. We must never forget this: We the people do have the right to take to the streets with our worries about our welfare. We the people do have the right to elect other politicians! But no politician has the right to elect another people!

For our people does not need to be reinvented. A people is not reinvented, it changes – slowly and carefully. Our people always welcomed and accepted foreigners who wanted to become Germans. That never was a problem. But our people must not be replaced.

There is another notion to this. It is not that easy, but it is important for all of us. Our people has a great and particular history. Our people has learned a lot from other peoples, and it also taught a lot to other peoples. Its ingenuity, its organisational talent, its diligence are proverbial. Its music and its philosophy are unique. Our people held its ground in the difficult center of Europe. It waged wars and got dragged into wars.

Why am I enumerating this? I do so because all of us here are the ones obliged and blessed to carry on this German history.

Conclusion at Alternative Right:

http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-continuation-of-germany.html

Posted by White Leftists protest secret EU/US deal on Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:17 | #

John MacDougall

http://lowvelder.co.za/afp/?afp-story-id=64604

Berlin (AFP) | 18 April 2015 21:35

Resistance to the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is fierce in Germany, with tens of thousands joining demonstrations across the country, a spokesman for lobby group Attac Germany said.

In southern Germany’s Munich alone, 23,000 people joined the protest, while 2,000 turned up in Leipzig, 1,000 in Stuttgart and 700 in Frankfurt.

Demonstrations in other European cities also drew protesters, including 2,000 in Brussels, 1,000 in Madrid and Helsinki, and around 300 in Warsaw and Prague.

The protests came as US and EU officials are set to resume a new round of negotiations in New York on Monday.

The EU-US trade deal would not just slash the already low trade tariffs the two parties share but would also harmonise regulations to an unprecedented degree, affecting goods and services as far-ranging as Roquefort cheese and accounting.

But campaigners in Europe are convinced that powerful interests are selling the consumer short in the secret negotiations.

The most contentious part of the deal includes a clause which allows corporations to sue governments in tribunals that are above national law.

Posted by Gysi advocates extinction of Germans on Mon, 20 Jul 2015 20:00 | #

Grysi advocates extinction of native Germans, calling them “Nazis”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riQh4Qpvxm4

“Live better without Nazis, ‘diversity’ is our future” he says..

Posted by At least 1 rape in Cologne migrant riot on Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:41 | #

TNO, ‘Mass Cologne Sex Attack: 1,000 Attackers’ 4 Jan 2016:

German police in the city of Cologne have finally admitted that the mass sex attack on German girls near the city’s famous cathedral on New Year’s Eve involved at least 1,000 nonwhite invaders, that at least one rape occurred, that the crowd hurled incendiary devices at the German public and the police—and that they were made up of recently arrived Arabic-speaking “refugees.”

Posted by Kiel Police: "don't bother" on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 05:22 | #

New Observer, ‘Refugee-Crime: Kiel Police Don’t Even Bother’ 28 Jan 2016:

There is so much nonwhite invader crime in the German city of Kiel that the police department there has issued orders to its officers not to even bother following up incidents—if the perpetrators are “refugees.”

Posted by The Birth of Neo-Liberalism on Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:50 | #

New York 1975 | The Birth Of Neo-Liberalism

Note: in this presentation, Woods (again) uses the term post modernity in the da-da misleading, YKW form.

Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Powell joined the 5-4 majority in Plyler v. Doe that a Texas law forbidding undocumented immigrant children from public education was unconstitutional.[32] Powell had a fairly conservative record in deciding cases, but joined the Court’s four liberal Justices to declare the law unconstitutional.