Identity crisis

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 30 November 2005 14:49.

One of the meagre amusements in watching one’s country slip by degrees into the clutches of unassimilable aliens is the complete hash they make of claiming to be, in any meaningful way, “British”.  No attempt at it really.  Nothing that rises above the derisory, anyway.  Nothing remotely sufficient, for example, to justify the most brazen and comical claims they make to my heritage - while at the same time advancing quite the most outrageous and perfectly conflicting demands on my tolerance.

But then for my sins I don’t expect anything else.  Rumours abounded during my long-past formative years that the, shall we say, personal probity of Arab and Indian sub-continental gentlemen was not always of the highest.  Something regrettable probably stuck and, today, all the experience of said gentlemen garnered by my clearly racist if not actually Nazi, colonial forefathers must be poisoning my narrow, unworthy mind.  I am quite blinded to the precious worth – nay, more – the cultural equality of these splendid persons and their splendid, burqa-encased person—females (and my, how grateful I am to be saved by their modesty from my base lust).

But it isn’t all bad news.  When the hopelessly correct BBC, an “equal opportunities employer”, cannot elicit an end to the confusion even a right-wing dinosaur like me may allow himself a brief moment of ecstatic celebration.

For anyone who did not faithfully peruse yesterday’s Daily Martyr, the news is that:-

Three Britons who were killed in Iraq were making a pilgrimage carried out by thousands of Shia Muslims every year, despite risks posed by the volatile country.

Yousif al-Khoei is a director of the al-Khoei foundation, the largest Shia organisation in the UK.  He believes up to 5,000 Shia Muslims from the UK visit holy sites in Iraq every year.

“There are two different reasons why people go to the shrines in Iraq,” he said. “Some go while they are in Iraq visiting family and so will go a number of times.

“But many Iraqis will combine visiting many shrines on one trip. They would collect life-time savings to do this and it would be very significant for them to be in this spiritual atmosphere.”

“Three Britons” … “Shia Muslims from the UK” … “many Iraqis” … a Muslim can, it seems, be all things to all men.  But further down the article we learn that:-

Mr Khoei believes Iraq’s recent security problems have put Shia Muslims off and “numbers have dropped.”

“But last year I was there and saw quite a lot of foreign pilgrims, including some from the UK,” he said.

Not Iraqi then, but foreign.  Whoops, no … because next we have:-

He said there were UK-based travel companies offering tours of religious sites, but believed most now travelled in community groups or independently.

Mohammed Bhojani, a member of the Muslim Council of Britain’s community working committee, believes UK-based Shia Muslims who visited mainly took tours from Dubai, Kuwait or Jordan.

So, merely “UK-based” - that sounds like a remarkably frank admission - but still, apparently, “foreign”.  How can this be?  How can my vibrant and, of course, equally British fellow-Britons possibly be only UK-based and yet foreign to Iraq?  I don’t understand.  Surely, the passport decides all these matters with absolute finality.  Amazing things, passports.  A bit of ink on a few scraps of paper … but quite sufficient to make any of the dead, disgraceful Theo’s goat-fuckers my five-minute fellow-countrymen.

No, be serious.  This is terrible.  The fate of the entire multicultural future may hinge on this single moment of multicultural vacillation.  But never fear, multiculturalists.  The day is saved by the BBC’s trusty Middle East analyst, Roger Hardy, who is on hand to set the keffiyeh straight:-

“The killing of British Shia pilgrims, as they were returning to Baghdad from the holy cities, suggests militants may regard all Shia as targets, whether Iraqi or non-Iraqi.”

So, unequivocally “British” and “non-Iraqi”.  Phew, what a relief that a non-Iraqi, non-Shia though quite possibly non-UK-based Englishman from, one must suppose, the UK was able to clear that up.

All this does, of course, leave me wondering what on earth is the meaning of the fifteen centuries of “UK residency” implied by my father’s family name and the nine by my mother’s.  Then, I am bound to point out, there was the thirty times he set course with 13,000 lbs of high explosive strapped to his arse … and the hundreds of hours she spent toiling over the whirring electronic delights of Bletchley Park.  But I am absolutely confident that the, of course, British, non-Iraqi and in no way merely UK-based Shias’ answer to that is: nothing.  Not a bloody thing.

I just do not accept it.  That’s the problem.  And it isn’t going to go away.



Comments:


1

Posted by AD on Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:25 | #

A passionate comment but mixed loyalties among immigrant populations are hardly news

It’s news when their loyalties start eroding our identities.


2

Posted by Luke the Drifter on Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:52 | #

A passionate comment but mixed loyalties among immigrant populations are hardly news
Posted by jonjayray

A very superficial comment- perhaps intentionally so?  I am in complete agreement with the GW’s sentiments.  The manner in which the media describes the concept and condition of citizenship makes it seem cheap and ultimately meaningless.  It’s like an ill-fitting suit that can be changed, doffed and donned at will. 

I’ll never come to the point of believing or accepting that a Turk is German, or that a Pakistani is British.  But succeeding generations probably will, unless, by chance or intent, something drastic happens.


3

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:46 | #

John Ray, do you react negatively at all to <u>this</u> Vdare.com letter-to-the-editor (which was also posted in an MR.com thread the other day by one of the regulars)?  If so, in what way?  Does it leave you with feelings of concern or do you walk away from it with the sense that everything’s fine?


4

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:50 | #

”[...W]hat on earth is the meaning of the fifteen centuries of ‘UK residency’ implied by my father’s family name and the nine by my mother’s.  [...N]othing.  Not a bloody thing.  I just do not accept it.  That’s the problem.  And it isn’t going to go away.”  (—from the log entry)

To partially unravel some of the mystery behind this, here’s more <u>crystal-clear sight</u> from the ever fog-piercing eye of Jim Kalb:
______

“The point of ‘multiculturalism’ though is not to give favors to minority cultures but to use the presence of minority cultures and the dogma of equality to disrupt and suppress the local inherited dominant culture, so it can’t function and society becomes purely an aggregate of individuals whose social existence depends wholly on their status as units of production and consumption in an overall system understood by its promoters as supremely rational. Whether rational or not, that system is in any case supremely easy to administer and manipulate because the people has been destroyed as a people, and so lacks all loyalties, standards and understandings of its own and thus the ability to think or act independently.

“The response of the French authorities and mainstream journalists to the riots reflects such an understanding of multiculturalism: the problem, they say, is that the ‘youths’ haven’t been integrated into the overall rational system of production and consumption, partly because the authorities haven’t done enough, they haven’t asserted their supremacy over all social relations with sufficient vigor, and partly because too many of the older things that once made up France have been permitted to survive. The solution, it is said, is therefore forcible therapy — help the ‘youths’ integrate, and destroy the old French particularities (‘bigotries’) that interfere with that integration.

“The youths are thus in effect acting as shock troops in a continuing revolution carried out by European elites against their own people. That is the fundamental reason the riots have not been suppressed.”
______

<u>All I know is</u> that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.”—Enoch Powell
Moratorium-plus-<u>Repatriation</u>!
Balkanization is better than Brazilianization!
The <u>1965 Immigration-Holocaust Act</u>:  the gift that keeps on giving!
What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the usual suspects!



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Europe’s first woman suicide bomber
Previous entry: Shakespeare

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sun, 22 Dec 2024 01:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle continued for comments after 1000' on Sat, 21 Dec 2024 16:14. (View)

anonymous commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle continued for comments after 1000' on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:11. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 21:35. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 20:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:49. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 18:47. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:01. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:52. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:17. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:23. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 08 Dec 2024 14:19. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 06 Dec 2024 20:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 06 Dec 2024 01:08. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 04 Dec 2024 19:00. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Mon, 02 Dec 2024 23:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'The journey to The Hague revisited, part 1' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:20. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'The journey to The Hague revisited, part 1' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 13:34. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 04:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 29 Nov 2024 01:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 23:49. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 01:33. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:02. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'News of Daniel' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:53. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election' on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 04:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Tue, 26 Nov 2024 02:10. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:05. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Sat, 23 Nov 2024 01:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Trump will 'arm Ukraine to the teeth' if Putin won't negotiate ceasefire' on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:28. (View)

affection-tone