Join the dots From the Independent today:-
And now, please cast your eye over this, from BBC News:-
Government is always happy to employ foreigners. They let these people in. They confiscate our moneys through the tax system and employ them or keep them on welfare. That’s the system. That’s why there are “diversity” tags on every public sector ad in Society Guardian. That’s why every public sector website sports a special para or page that trumpets the devotion to “diversity”. According to the National Statistics Office “Half of Black Caribbean and Black African women (54 per cent and 52 per cent respectively) worked in the public administration, education or health sector.” I can’t find any statistic for black male employment. However, I don’t suppose it is much different, prison notwithstanding. There are clear signs that, as well as in the public services, Pakistanis and Bangadeshis work in parallel economies serving their own communities. What else is one to conclude from stories such as this business in Corby but that minority employment is artificially constructed, and has little impact on wealth creation? One can, at least, be perfectly authentic in taking it to pieces again. We owe these people nothing. We have paid far too much for them already. Comments:2
Posted by Mr Bloke on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:16 | # Did you miss this? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=439094&in_page_id=1770 “Equality chief says firms ‘should have race quotas for workers’” “The head of the new equality commission yesterday called for race quota laws that will allow employers to favour minorities.” “He said a sweeping new equality law should allow public sector organisations and private firms to choose workers on race grounds to end ‘immovable, persistent, disadvantage’.” So, you could legally discriminate against the majority and have a firm made up entirely of minority workers provided the minority workers included the right number of wimmin, single mothers and disabled. But, a majority employer could not have a firm made up entirely of majority workers. 3
Posted by Kenelm Digby on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:06 | # How do the regular contributors here square the much vaunted ‘fact’ of low African IQ (as per the works of Lynn, Rushton and others), and the apparent preponderence (that is the right word surely for 40% in the ‘professional’ bracket) in ‘high IQ occupations’ ? 4
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:37 | # Richard Lynn and Phillipe Rushton are, of course, right. It is the distortion of the social engineer and the selective statistician that account for the appearances - deceiving as appearances designed by government are always apt to be. 5
Posted by Kenelm Digby on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:18 | # From an EGI point of view, this is very bad news. 6
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:00 | # Kenelm, I think it is fait to say that you joined the dots and extended the line. The Corby story made the leader column in the Telegraph today:-
The article goes on to mention, in regulation-form, the “odious BNP” that is “expertly exploiting” the resentment caused by official anti-native British policies. The subsequent comment thread contains plenty of resentment at that, too. And these are the comments that the Telegraph guard dogs have let passed (I can’t get anything published there at the moment). Here’s a sample:-
Posted by Martin Wingfield on March 2, 2007 6:31 AM
Posted by Jack Wallhurst on March 2, 2007 6:00 AM
Posted by alan lee on March 2, 2007 3:39 AM
Posted by jeff cox on March 2, 2007 2:48 AM
Posted by Dave on March 2, 2007 2:36 AM 7
Posted by Kenelm Digby on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:08 | # Fred, 8
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:12 | # Yes Fred, “hideously white” was a phrase employed by Ted Cantle, the Jewish inventor of the hate-ideology, Interculturalism. But the same hate-term, “hideously white”, was employed by the then Director General of the BBC, Greg Dyke. Both Cantle and Dyke are Jews. 9
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:21 | # I will correct that. From Rense.com
So let’s assume Dyke is simply a traitor to his people in the name of the internationalist religion of our beloved elites. 10
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:49 | # Fred, Dyke resigned from his job in 2004, after he was criticised by Lord Hutton in the latter’s report of the Kelly affair. He was replaced by Mark Thompson. 11
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:31 | # Well, the Hutton Enquiry was a bit of a false flag operation. Ostensibly, it was convened to investigate the circumstances surrounding the death, apparently by suicide, of biological warfare expert and former United Nations weapons inspector, David Kelly. In fact, Hutton was hand-picked by Blair crony Lord Falconer because he had a record of favouring government. For those who have forgotten, the affair began as a Radio 4 news report by BBC reporter, Andrew Gilligan, in which he claimed that a certain weapons expert had told him the government’s dossier justifying an invasion of Iraq was “sexed up”. Hutton duly found the BBC fully culpable and the government cleared. The reporter, Gilligan, and various others in the chain of seniority departed. The last to go was Dyke, much against his will. 12
Posted by Kenelm Digby on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:53 | # Whatever one’s opinion of Greg Dyke is, I believe the best way to gauge his caliber is to review the programming decisions he made as the DG of the BBC. 13
Posted by Asian Cognitive Elitism on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:55 | # http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/hampshire/6397993.stm We need to encourage the mass immigration, to our shores, of these intelligent, law-abiding, high-IQ, disciplined technocrats. 14
Posted by Al Ross on Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:42 | # Buchanan is probably correct. No Third World country should even hesitate in signing a bilateral free-trade agreement with the US. The once-great nation runs a trade deficit with everybody. 15
Posted by ben tillman on Sun, 04 Mar 2007 20:01 | # The bottom line: if you are rich, replacing $20/hr labor with $1/hr labor is profit pure and easy…. It’s not that simple. You still have to be able to sell the product. If you cut wages by 95%, you have to cut prices by a similar amount or there will be no market for the product. Reducing wages benefits employers only to the extent that competitors pay a higher wage. In our present situation, the profit comes not from the reduction in wages but from the confiscation and consumption of the former workers’ capital. Senator Ted Kennedy is now spearheading an immigration “reform” that gives an illegal immigrant “MS-13” drug gang member the same rights to citizenship as a Nobel-prizewinning Indian physicist. This cannot be justified by either morality or national interest. Morality and the national interest are the same thing. 17
Posted by Retew on Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:07 | # No it isn’t GW, it’s in the choices we make in life from which we build our character. Sometimes growing up in a dysfunctional family can give you a perfect illustration of what you don’t want to be like. 18
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:42 | # Retew, I understand that opinion, and I don’t dispute it in entirety. But I have had the opportunity during my life to appreciate how very much weaker we - if we can be said to exist at all in any permanent sense - really are. As a characteristic of the human personality, choice - or free will - is a deception. Only in self-consciousness is choice in any real sense possible to carry through with any kind of gathering of our psychological resources. However, our limited capacities, such as they are, do count for something. They are a companion piece to the inherited realities of our moral lives. Evolved behaviours do exist, you know. Even faith is an evolved behaviour, and not a choice. 19
Posted by Kenelm Digby on Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:56 | # Of course, nothing gladdes the hearts of these people more than the sight of White man sweeping the streets and emptying the dust-bins, while talon-nailed, loud-mothed, inefficient black women sit on their ample backsides in centrally heated offices doing nothing but exercising their mouths in local government jobs.This sight is depressingly familiar in London. (I remember the notorious ‘Anna Climbie’ case in which it was revealled that the social work Dept. of Harringay Council spent their work-time holding voodoo ceremonies in the office. Post a comment:
Next entry: Astronaut Farmer
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Daniel J on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:20 | #
I have the perfect supplement to this article. It came from Lew Rockwell the other day. It is about the welfare state in general.
<a href=“http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti> The Forgotten Man</a>
Here is the excerpt I feel to be of particular relevance:
The type and formula of most schemes of philanthropy or humanitarianism is this: A and B put their heads together to decide what C shall be made to do for D.
Everyone check out my website!
It is completely lacking in style but I am going to compile a large amount of classic literature and texts. If anyone has any ideas let me know and I will get them up there.