|
|
|
Magic Negro Johnson Saves Humanity? Bear with me for a moment while I set the stage for the introduction of our Magic Negro du jour. As I’ve argued before, a sustainable eugenic civilization should proportionately favor the reproduction of carrying capacity creators. Chief among those creators are inventors. There are vast numbers of minor such inventors, such as my father who won the National Clean Plowing Championships 2 years running by improvising field engineering mods to the standard John Deere plow with bailing wire, but there are few major such inventors, such as Jethro Tull, whose seed drill amplified carrying capacity by as much as an order of magnitude or Norman Borlaug whose “green revolution” has returned billions for other races and so little in terms of population growth for his own lineage or race. So far, few white nationalists would have much to argue with here since the vast majority of carrying capacity creation upon which whites depend is due to white invention, and quite arguably, much more than a billion non-whites walk their land because they were fed by carrying capacity itself largely created by inventions by whites. But we now face a potential global Malthusian disaster unless there are dramatic technological enhancements: a Malthusian disaster driven less by population growth than carrying capacity loss, a Malthusian disaster within which race war would become necessary in order to defend dwindling carrying capacity. Enhancements of technology are subject, of course, to the availability of capital for inventors which is, itself, subject to Jewish virulence’s centralization of economic power with centralization’s concomitant corruption of the technology investment class—a dismal prospect unpredicted by “the dismal science”—a prime beneficiary of Jewish virulence as so many “Nobel” Prizes in economics attest. With the consequent destruction of the yeoman class, we are losing our ability to create revolutions in science and technology. So what to do? Who might come along and save us from this dilemma by providing technological breakthroughs in a situation where white wealth is centralized in the hands of the corrupt? No other race is so responsible for the population overshoot of the planet but no other race is so dispossessed of its own resources with which it might create more carrying capacity—those resources turned, instead, to insane middle eastern wars and suicidal subsidy of hostile ethnicities invading its territories worldwide. Who will save the world from global race war? Enter African American Inventor, Lonnie Johnson, pictured here with his billion dollar market “Super Soaker” squirt gun: News articles are announcing that Lonnie “Super Soaker” Johnson has invented a fundamentally new and very important way of generating electricity that would raise the world’s carrying capacity by as much Jethro Tull’s seed drill or Norman Borlaug’s green revolution: The Johnson Thermoelectric Energy Conversion System:
Understand we are not talking about just any old thermocouple, but a dramatically more efficient means of converting ubiquitously available low-grade energy, heat, to higher grade energy, electricity. This would dramatically raise the efficiency of generating electricity from heat sources as divergent as solar and nuclear. It is so efficient, “electric” cars could burn natural gas for heat to power his electrical generator. It could even let the Theodore Kaczynski‘s of the world power their log cabins with electricity from their wood burning stoves before letting entropy turn the tree-collected solar energy to back into heat for their cabins. The skeptic—particularly the racist skeptic—might object that there are such “breakthroughs” announced from crackpots all the time—that Lonnie Johnson’s background as an “inventor” of the Super Soaker is evidence of little more than his ability to turn his profits as toy maven to con-artistry. But consider that: 1) Lonnie Johnson is an MIT “Inventor of the Week” How are we to discount a man with such ringing endorsements? Here are the 3 ways of making sense of this: 1) The government funded science bureaucracy, including MIT, is so submissive to the theocracy of Holocaustianity that it is selling out its credibility to support bogus inventions on the off chance that they might be real and thereby offer moral justification for its policies that have replaced billions of whites with billions of nonwhites despite the long history of white creation of carrying capacity. I’m not going to argue here for one or the other of these interpretations—leaving it to you, my gentle reader, and future historians to decide.
Comments:2
Posted by Frank McGuckin on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:19 | # The fundamental issue for White Americans is this:racial annihilation through post-1965 non-white immigration. Preservation of White Amreica requires shutting down all non-white immigration. How does the existence of Lonnie Johnson change this James? Lonnie Johnson’s existernce doesn’t change anything? Non-White immigration is either shut down or OUR people die? Not very complicated. Werbos is not a physcist. His training and PHD are in the social sciences mixed in with some computer science. 3
Posted by Frank McGuckin on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:33 | # Is it Jobling or Jewbling,Jewblingwitz,Joblingstien,Joblingber,Joblingfried, Horojobliblingwitz or Finkeljoblingstein? 4
Posted by VLC on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:29 | # I just read Philip Emeagwali is one of the most famous African-American inventors of the 20th century. he was also a MIT inventor of the week: http://web.archive.org/web/20051220132246/http://web.mit.edu/invent/iow/emeagwali.html
5
Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:43 | # The technology of maximum applied price/performance achieved in 1989, over the Gordon Bell prize involving Emeagwali, is pretty marginal in terms of carrying capacity creation. Yes, he failed to beat the other competitors for that prize and has been fraudulently put forth as winner of that prize and while applied computation speed is important the real advances were made when the transistor and the planar integrated circuit were developed kicking off Moore’s Law. Hell, if I wanted to quibble, I could claim that _I_ had the highest performance and highest applied price/performance in 1989 since I ran a trainable artificial neural network image segmentation system for processing multisource data on a DataCube FIR system I _built_ from VME cards and patched digital video bus cables, as well as programmed at the microinstruction level. Performance: 1.5GOPS since each synapse required a multiply and add. The fact that my operations were integer rather than floating point shouldn’t matter to the _applied_ price performance prize. The only question is: does it do the job? Floating point is for pussies who can’t solve their numeric round-off problems. But it wasn’t anything of importance for carrying capacity creation—not approaching even that of a national clean plowing championship. The big contributors to Moore’s Law had done their work prior to the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act. 6
Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:04 | # Frank, keep it in perspective: While it is true that the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act is fundamental, so is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New Deal’s, WW II’s, the Cold War’s and The Great Society’s centralization of resources in government bureaucracy. The 1964 act denies self-determination of domestic communities within the US and the 1965 act denies self-determination of the US itself. The combination of the two is synergistic in that any vicious culture from anywhere in the world can breach first the US border on the strength of the 1965 act and then, on the strength of the 1964 act, breach our individual choices of relationships. Then there is also the increasing centralization of society in government, which places more and more of the resources of society in play with institutions like NASA, NSF and MIT, leading to progressive public choice rent seeking under both of the prior acts. Lonnie Johnson’s “invention”, under the Holocaustianity interpretation is due to his exploitation of affirmative action programs under the 1964 act, amplifying his status within increasingly centralized government institutions. Lonnie Johnson’s invention, under the interpretation that it is real, is important because if African Americans are actually producing individuals that create carrying capacity in the large then it is not necessary that a race war break out between whites and blacks over carrying capacity. 7
Posted by Frank McGuckin on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:27 | # James It really does look like Civil Rights for blacks is/was more than highly correlated with the subsequent racial and economic dispossession of Euro-Americans. It is/was cause and effect. The 1965 immigration reform act was seen by young demented Liberals back at the time such as Cornell Labor Economist Vernon Briggs as a very natural in-the-spirit extension of 1964 civil rights legislation(check out the recent interview with professor Briggs in The Social Contract). Blacks don’t care about the welfare of my family and other White familes and I don’t care about the welfare of their families. I want to puke every time I hear liberal immigration reformers making the case for immigration reform based upon how immigation harms blacks. These cockroaches now make the case for immigration refrom based upon not only how it harms the negro…but also how immigration harms…gulp….hispanics and Asians…after all we are all Amreicans…America is an idea nation. Fuck all you liberal immigration reformers.
8
Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:47 | # Guessedworker, the time for dealing with the population overshoot problem is a lot shorter than most people think. A year ago last July, my talk about “hyperinflation” was, to “the authorities”, risible, and now is discussed during the presidential race—things collapse rapidly when they collapse. The situation pointed to by Soren’s article about the conflict between food and fuel combined with Soren’s article about creeping interdependency of systems at critical load is that things are going to come to a head within the next decade. I wouldn’t be surprised to see mortality rates already rising significantly but not being widely reported—sort of the way we have been treated to 80 years of silence about the Holodomor or the much larger genocide of the boomer generation (tens of millions of demographic decline in the US alone). We’re seeing evidence of that in the way we are repeatedly treated to new “surprisingly” high numbers of mortalities due to emerging drug resistant diseases. 9
Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:13 | # Frank, while I admit that the odds are pretty slim, despite his “blue ribbon” endorsements, that Johnson’s device will work, it is nevertheless a good mental exercise to consider the realistic (ie: carrying capacity-based) alternatives to race war since this puts things in the realm of RATIOnality as in the RATIO between the odds that Johnson’s device will work and the odds that Johnson’s device won’t work. The difference is the difference between separatism and supremacy. There is no widely accepted moral argument that a “white separatist” can be denied self-defense except on the basis that he is a crypto “white supremacist” which is a connotation-distorted phrase taken to mean he finds the free existence of other races inherently unjustifiable. Keep in mind the biggest problem facing our people is their morale. 10
Posted by foxbark on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:05 | # In order for this device to actually be useful and to generate realistic amounts of electricity, then high temperatures must be utilized eg from atomic fission or decay. The idea that the ‘thermocouple device’ will ever have enough pwer to drive a car is remote. 11
Posted by James Bowery on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:05 | # The idea that the ‘thermocouple device’ will ever have enough pwer to drive a car is remote. You may be correct but there are two issues: 1) The likely performance of Johnson’s device. 2) What Johnson claims his device is capable of. I’ve been attempting to avoid 1, as it is beyond my expertise, and focus on 2. Let’s be clear that his claimed performance would beat a hybrid car’s use of internal combustion torque applied to a dynamo electrical generator as a means of converting fuel energy to electrical energy for the hybrid. Internal combustion engines are around 20% efficient. Even if you could come up with a dynamo electrical generator of 100% conversion efficiency, Johnson’s device would, if it operates as he claims, be easily 3 times as efficient in hybrid cars. 12
Posted by Arcane on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:43 | # I’ve been watching this site for a few months now . . . very interesting discussions you all have been having, although it is endlessly entertaining watching folks confusing others for me. It’s interesting the discussion brought up foxbark’s comment regarding HTGRs / PBMRs. What is most interesting is how the Chinese are pondering building these en masse and utilizing them to jumpstart a hydrogen based economy. Next to France, the biggest nuclear intelligence operations conducted in the U.S. are done by the Chinese, and the fact they’re placing such emphasis on this technology should spark everyone’s interest, regardless of ideology. 13
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:15 | # It’s a good thing Arcane gave us the link to his blog — we’ve all be dying to read more of his thinking. 14
Posted by tampa on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:12 | # Arcane puts Majority Rights on his “extremism” list: 15
Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:31 | # it is endlessly entertaining watching folks confusing others for me. So your job is to spread disinformation? 16
Posted by Proofreader on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:34 | # From Arcane´s profile: I’m an officer in the U.S. Air Force. I dedicate my time to studying and fighting the enemies of America and Western Civilization while simultaneously maximizing our national and civilizational capabilities, real and potential. Full spectrum dominance is essential; anything less is suicide. LOL! Here´s my translation: I´m a neocon snitch who lurks and trolls dissident internet sites. I work for the government in my mother´s basement. As for his links page, really! MacDonald a WN? The Front National a WN party? He´s got everything wrong! Pretty useful though as a quick reference page: http://nightontheline.blogspot.com/2006/09/extremists.html Thanks, Arcane! 17
Posted by Svigor on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:52 | # You guys leave Arcane alone! He should be almost done with his book contra MacDonald by now, and I don’t want you guys fucking it up! 18
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:20 | # I just checked out Arcane’s “extremist” and “stepping-stone” lists (see “tampa’s” comment, above) — hey all my favorites sites are on ‘em! What an asshole Arcane is, a perfect match for the fever swamp he hangs out in. Such a waste of perfectly good oxygen! Hopeless piece of garbage. 19
Posted by Arcane on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:41 | # ... like hungry rats on cheese! Glad to see you guys are much more interested in hate than debate. I actually tried to expand the discussion here. Instead you limited yourself to highly emotional attacks on me. Who’s the troll? 20
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:38 | # Why would you want to participate in debate at a site you list as “extremist,” Arcane? 21
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:39 | # By the way, can you get your friends at GnXp to stop posting interracial porn under my name? Thank you, much obliged. 22
Posted by Lurker on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:54 | # Arcane, I looked at your site including the bit about parties you would vote for. By your own standards then is not your own site ‘extremist’ or at least a ‘stepping stone’? If not why not? Futhermore, what exactly is it about MR that makes it into the extremist category? 23
Posted by Proofreader on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:29 | # OK, Arcane, here’s a non-emotional question for you: why would you vote for Vlaams Belang but consider the Front National a WN party? Aren’t both parties equally nationalist: the former Flemish nationalist, the latter French nationalist. Is there anything wrong with that? BTW, if the pursuit of “full spectrum dominance”, as you put it, is not extremist, then I don’t know what is. 25
Posted by Beer Gut on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:40 | # Thermocouples need very high temperatures just to be able to produce a ‘passable’ voltage. 27
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:32 | #
It’s one and three on the part of those who actually have a view or pretend to. Where PC is concerned, about 70% don’t actually dupe themselves into having any view, they just “go along to get along” as they aim at pleasing the establishment until they can retire, encouraged along the way by intermittent reminders, à la Larry Summers and James Watson, that theirs is indeed the right strategy. Nothing coherent is going through their head but if really pressed and placed in a mind-reading machine their thoughts would run something like, “Did you see what happened to James Watson??? Sorry pal, I have a mortgage to finish paying off and two kids in college with a third to start next year, and I sure as hell am not going to get the powers mad at me!!! So go peddle your ‘racial reality’ to someone else: it’s irrelevant to my life right now!!! What’s relevant is surviving!!!” And yes that includes the guys at the once-august MIT: there’s no place PC’s tentacles don’t reach. 28
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:50 | # Plus the fact that the once-august MIT hasn’t escaped the obligation to make plenty of racial and “gender” affirmative-action appointments to the committees conferring these awards: an awards committee two-thirds of which is unqualified women and Negroes plus whatever Mexicans or Puerto-Ricans can be scrounged up, the rest split between Jews with the mentality of Alon Ziv, Subcons and Orientals seething with racial resentment against Euros, and the minimum possible number of cowed Euros who just happen to be psychologically indistinguishable from Birch Barlow, isn’t exactly likely to make decisions in accord with traditional academic standards. 29
Posted by Arcane on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:41 | # Beer Gut is correct about the thermocouples that currently exist, but I would argue that, like numerous other technologies, there has been little need to modernize the design of thermocouples and, as such, the technology is outdated. Perhaps this will spark some new designs coming to the fore. I could be wrong, though. As far as my “extremist” list is concerned, I should say that I haven’t updated that list in a long time and that it is by no means comprehensive. It was designed mostly out of personal interest as I like studying the far-right, although I think the far-left, which is far larger and more prolific, is a greater threat. And some of you are right: the list is based not based upon any truly objective measure. I classify anybody as an extremist if they do one of the following: 1. Advocate the destruction, or splitting up, of the United States Primarily, if they’re on that list, they’re on there because they’re anti-American. Anti-American = extremism. And yes, I do support groups like the Vlaams Belang. The FN is absolutely obsessed with World War II and the Holocaust, and still has very anti-American and anti-Semitic elements, although this is changing. Who knows? Maybe in a few years they’ll have reformed enough, to your horror, that’d I be willing to support them just like I do Vlaams Belang, the BNP, Italian National Alliance, or Swedish Democrats, all of which have nasty pasts. 30
Posted by Arcane on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:45 | # And since I’m obviously not welcome, I’m out. Goodbye. Sorry for bothering you. 31
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:57 | #
Boy, you got that right! Oh by the way, this site isn’t on “the far right,” it’s strictly 1950s middle-of-the-road (actually a bit to the left of that, just a bit). This site hasn’t got a “far right” bone in its body. Put that in your “far right” pipe and smoke it ... and smoke it all the way back to GnXp (and tell whoever it is over there who keeps posting porn in my name here to stop, would you? Thanks, now run along.) 32
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:01 | # 1. Advocate the destruction, or splitting up, of the United States The ultimate interest is white American sovereignty and, thereby, survival. If that can be secured within a segregated, non-Multicultural America, then the present geographic unit has utility. If it can’t, then a sovereign unit must be created out of the present one. The unit is not an end or interest in itself, except for freeriding elites and minorities. 2. Advocate the destruction of Israel IMO, Israel is a substantial part of the solution to the Jewish problem. Its survival is generally supported by WNs precisely because WN is not a double standard like Zionism. 3. Oppose market economics and advocate hard-leftist economic models The BNP proposes Schumackerism. Personally, I oppose that in favour of the Japanese economic model. Unrestricted global capitalism, however, is, if not an unalloyed evil, highly negative for large sections of Mankind. 4. Call for the destruction of the West The West is being destroyed by the economic, political and racial status quo. 5. Advocate unlimited and unfettered immigration to the West Erm ...? 6. Are obsessed with World War II revisionism Interested. Not obsessed. 33
Posted by Proofreader on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:08 | # I can only speak for myself, (a modest commenter) but anybody who opposes points 3 and 4 is welcome here, Arcane. But tell me, how is advocating the destruction of Iran - as many in the brass and neocons do-, for instance, any less extremist than destroying Israel? And why should Israel be favoured by the USA over Europeans? The special partnership between the USA and Israel is pretty strange, much like a French open marriage where the semitic lady cheats on the other partner time and again. I can´t see the logic where destroying Israel is verboten, but blowing Serbia to smithereens is fine and non-extremist. Can you say that with a straight face? And why don´t you consider the ADL an extremist group? They fulfill every point on your list except 2). 34
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:31 | # Where I stand wrt Arcane’s criteria: 1. Advocate the destruction, or splitting up, of the United States? Yes, absolutely. The Demented Mistakes of Kwamerikwa is currently at the forefront of efforts by the New World Ordure to exterminate the Euro race everywhere it exists. Advocating the DMK’s destruction is elementary self-defense on the part of any Euro with functioning eyes and brain. By the way, the DMK isn’t the United States. That was destroyed long ago, starting with Lincoln and proceeding through Roosevelt-II to all administrations coming after the 1960s advent of Jewish hegemony, the Jews dealing it its final death blow mainly with their It’s Good For The Jews 1965 Guaranteed-Euro-Genocide Act. The U.S. no longer exists; neither does the Constitution. Dream on. The only question now is how Euros bail out and start over, being sure to get it right this time. No we’re not dead yet, and we will rise — no thanks to your gurus over at GnXp, to say the least. 2. Advocate the destruction of Israel? I happen to be a strong Israel supporter but on the general subject of Israel as it now exists, there are “things wrong with this picture,” such as, to cite just one, a certain notion on the part of Jewish neocons that Israel is supposed to be an appendage of the U.S. It’s not. But that’s a whole ‘nother discussion. I oppose unbridled capitalism which includes the Bush family’s crony capitalism. Economics theory isn’t my strong suit but the economic system I favor appears to belong in the broad category of National Socialism (Nazism for short), to which category belong today’s national economic set-ups of Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Israel, and more and more China (though China has a long way to go yet, clearly), to cite just a few. (Israel is a National Socialist apartheid state.) I and all the comrades here want to save the West. Too bad, by the way, that Christianity is stabbing the West in the back right now — we’ll have to give some thought to that problem. No comment needed. Though no expert obviously, I’m satisfied that the available evidence mandates Holocaust agnosticism (which amounts to denial since it says, “I’ll believe it when I see the evidence; jailing doubters isn’t evidence”) and the available evidence mandates the view that Germany and Japan were deliberately maneuvred into war with the British Empire and the U.S. (i.e.,, war with the Anglosphere of the day). See Harry Elmer Barnes. The Jews played a huge role in that but were far from the only players, obviously. NB: the above are my views. I speak for no one else here except for #5 which everyone here agrees on; much of what I said for the others would get lots of opposition here. 35
Posted by rustymason on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:00 | # Fred sed: “I and all the comrades here want to save the West.” I think so, but what about James Bowery? James, weren’t you advocating at one time that we forget the whole mess the West has become and start again with a “clean slate”? Perhaps I misremember or you have changed your opinion. 36
Posted by VLC on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:13 | # Proofreader:
37
Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:23 | # rustymason, I mentioned “civilization” in this article mainly to emphasize the tendency for civilization to be dysgenic. I dislike civilization in general for some important reasons that are no longer outweighed by the benefits of civilization over a more dispersed population structure, if they ever have been. First and foremost I dislike civilization for the reason pointed out by W. D. Hamilton in “Innate Social Aptitudes of Man” quoted in one of my linked articles: It never seems to escape its dysgenic character. Secondly, I dislike civilization due to its tendency to evolve vectorism, a failure mode most prominently displayed in Jews. I’m not saying that civilization is inherently evil anymore than I would say that a 747 jet is inherently evil. The problem is that if the flight schools, aerospace schools and engineering departments are all taken over by gremlins who have castrated the folks who built those things, its time to sell Boeing short. 38
Posted by VLC on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:37 | # Arcane:
Guessedworked or whoever runs this site, why don’t you slap him with a glove and start a new thread just for him?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11158-2004May8.html
39
Posted by Proofreader on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:51 | # VLC, my objection to caling MacDonald a WN comes from my dislike of the label “WN”. What people call WNism is just plain old traditional pre-1965 mainstream American “Weltanschauung”, when the USA was a country ruled by Whites for Whites. On destroying America, blogger Mencius Moldbug has an interesting essay here: http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-to-actually-defeat-us-government.html So has Rozeff: 40
Posted by VLC on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:51 | # Arcane:
One can kind of guess why an interviewer would want to bring such an unrelated question into an interview with a politician he doesn’t like. It went like this: RADIO HOST: JMLP: RADIO HOST: JMLP: RADIO HOST: JMLP: RADIO HOST: JMLP:
The FN is against the Gayssot law, the Pleben law, the Perben law and all the other laws forbidding the expression of “bad thoughts”. In a sane country these laws wouldn’t exist. Imagine having to fight for the installment of the equivalent of the first amendment in a country that has no constitutional protection for freedom of speech and in which these opinion regulating laws are vague enough that they can be used to rake anyone who isn’t jumping with joy at the thought of seeing the french nation killed by mass immigration. If that’s what you call that an obsession you’re an idiot. and there’s noting wrong with being ‘anti-american’: being hostile to a state that is killing its own nation and working to destroy western nations is elementary sanity. One can be an ‘anti-american’ for bad reasons or good reasons but you ascribe only the bad ones to the expression ‘anti-american’ 41
Posted by VLC on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:53 | # More recently Bruno Gollnisch, the FN’s no.2 (married to and father of three children with a japanese woman, so much for being apparently a party of ‘WN’) was suspended of his teaching position for five years and brought to court and condemned to pay 5,000 E over his comments at a press conference on the * freedom to discuss WW2 and holocaust history * because you see saying historians should be free to debate and discuss freely about historical events in the context of the holocaust means he’s insinuating that there’s possibly something to debate which means he’s a crypto-holorevisionist which means under the Gayssot law he’s guilty of a contestation of crimes against humanity. (I believe that at the time some student wanted to present a holorevisionist doctorate thesis and he [BG] was annoyed at the witch hunt that ensued in his university but I would have to dig up the initial news stories because the newest ones only mention the verdict and I don’t recall precisely what I read at the time of the ‘incident’). I’m not making this up: Gollnisch didn’t explicitely and technically broke the law he argued that the law shouldn’t exist and in the twisted minds of the corrupt judges that means he’s guilty of holocaust revisionism by intention. French judges are mind readers, you didn’t know that did you? interview with Gollnisch on his trial here: http://www.fn69.fr/zoomarticle.php?numarticle=69 Le Pen was last month finally condemned after two years of trials and appeals to pay 10,000 E and to do (symbolically speaking because it’s a suspended sentence) 5 months of prison for saying in an interview that the german occupation of France in WW2 at least wasn’t “particularly inhuman” (he was a teenager at the time). It isn’t the FN that is obsessed by holorevisionism it’s the leftists and jews who run France. In a sane country there would be freedom of speech and each side would be able to debate and there wouldn’t be any witch hunts and nobody would be guilty of anything if they support the freedom to discuss history. 42
Posted by VLC on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:54 | # (can someone remove the unitentional smilies ? shouldn’t they be turned off anyway ?) 43
Posted by VLC on Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:19 | # here’s something for MLK day, I’m late but it’s a classic: Marchin’ Lootin’ Killin’ Day spoken version: http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/audio/mlk216-16.mp3 written one: http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/mlk2.htm
Post a comment:
Next entry: Sir Edmund Hillary, 20 July 1919 - 11 January 2008
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:16 | #
Interesting, James. How long til the bubble bursts or we have to choose option two?