Monomania in egalitaria
From the Telegraph
Now, Jenny Watson is a good example of the left at work. Professionally, she is a human rights “advisor”, which is no profession that I understand. It seems to mean that she is a specialist in finding cosy, taxpayer-funded sinecures where government abuts industry. But it is her directorship of the Lichstenstein-based Global Partners & Associates that really communicates the meaning of these engagements. GPA appears from its website to be a normal company training organisation, publishing guides and videos, and running courses for managers and sales staff. But the description on Jenny Watson’s bio states that GPA is, in fact, “an organisation which promotes democracy and human rights world wide: working on human rights projects in the UK, clients comprise public bodies and non-governmental organisations.” Note that the claim isn’t that GPA promotes efficiency or success. It promotes democracy and human rights. If that’s what it does - and I assume Jenny wrote the bio herself - the GPA website goes to a lot of trouble to avoid saying this, presumably because its few fee-paying private sector customers would baulk at a Gramscian in their midst. There are hundreds of Jenny Watsons in every Western country. Step by step they coerce society towards the progressive paradise. They are the foot soldiers, winning the war on the ground. It’s not their purpose to dream up the next great stride towards freedom, be it for blacks in America or women at work or queers anywhere or trannies or even apes. It’s not their purpose to get elected, and to listen to the Marxist dreamers and then, in time, unfailingly incorporate their dreams into law. But the Jenny Watsons do enter into the revolutionary process next. Theirs is the job of injecting the many strains of egalitarian virus into our commercial and cultural bloodstream. They do it every day of their working lives. It is their mission, their love, and we actually have to pay for the privilege. I suppose that in our magically equal future some thoughtless knuckle-dragger who “harrasses” a female at work might be able to claim legal dispensation under the Monkey Law. But short of that I’m afraid we are in trouble, and it’s no longer good enough to laugh at anything our political persecutors propose. Comments:2
Posted by ben tillman on Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:52 | # Unacceptable e-mail behaviour ranges from the more crude practice of circulating e-mails or text messages with pornographic attachments to the more insidious one of sending e-mails laden with sexual innuendo or commenting on a colleague’s appearance. It should be obvious to all that the steps taken to prevent a “hostile environment” for female workers—i.e., the eradication of masculine behavior—often create a “hostile environment” for male workers. But the Littler Mendelsons of the world seem never to raise such points. I wonder why? Post a comment:
Next entry: From Real Estate to Microstate Via Neighborhood Preferences
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Al Ross on Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:05 | #
The insane placing of so-called human rights above both our nation’s laws and the wishes of its citizens is only possible because of the Herculean efforts of the one race which regards its members (and only its members) as being Talmudically human.