MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 19:01.

KMadv
On the Radio page now Prof. MacDonald discusses four topics with GW and Daniel: the individualism of the European, implicit whiteness, the psychology of Jews, and the problem of nationalism dwelling in the past.  In addition, certain technical questions raised by Graham Lister are put to Prof MacDonald for his comment.

The interview is quite a long one by our standards, but I believe it is entertaining and informative throughout.
...... 
                      balmore             
Well, you could ask him how inclusive fitness theory predictions change under increased competition (the scale of competition) - siblicide and other related phenomena (parent-offspring conflict) are very real (Google sibling rivalry in nature) and are examples of intra genomic conflict as predicted by Hamilton’s work.

Given that no-one seems to conceptually acknowledge the dark side (so to speak) of inclusive fitness theory it perhaps undermines the creditability of those that wish to make broad political points using inclusive fitness theory as to (1) do they actually fully understand the theory and (2) do they understand how excess competition effectively removes relatedness from the picture (siblings killing siblings is perfectly optimal within many animal species from the point of view of the victorious Sib).

Given that fitness within social evolution can be derived from both the individual level and the group level (note all evolutionary change concerns changes in alleles and their frequencies) as demonstrated by Hamilton and Price’s work (and Steve Frank etc) in hierarchical selection theory how do these insights relate to political economy?

For example, if we take Aristotle seriously than any polis must be a balance between the parts and the whole (individuals and the group) what mechanism can be used to discourage ‘free-riding’ and self-serving perfidy by our own indigenous elites? Accountability to the groups interests seems lacking in contemporary Western life.

If Europeans are so ‘individuated’ - uniquely so? - why is it that only a few centuries ago that Celts, Nordic people etc were so tribal and ultra-communitarian in their cultures. Why the stark difference in pre-modern pagan social ontology compared to the ontology of liberal modernity. Given the relatively short time frame any explanation based upon changes in gene frequency would seem analytically bankrupt. The Greeks also had a more communitarian social-ontology (Sparta anyone?, Aristotle and virtue ethics etc).

Given the social ontology of liberal modernity (massive ideological emphasis on individ- uals and individualism) what type of personalities and psychological traits succeed within such a environment? If all human interactions are viewed through the prism of individual competition is that healthy or wise for the long term sustainability of the group (one could speak here too of free-riding and the slow accumulation of toxic ‘externalities’ cultural, environmental, social etc generated by liberal modernity which in short term benefit certain individuals but at the longer term determent of everyone).

Given that all political societies are ultimately about power and power relationships (see Carl Schmidt), and that power is always open to abuse, a high degree of relatetedness/ homogeneity/ social capital is by itself not enough. What mechanism of elite accountability and social cohesion are possible and necessary?

If denied the siblicide point, then why are civil wars so vicious and nasty (often the worst)? Higher levels of relatedness (on average) didn’t stop Englishmen, or Irishmen from utterly hateful behaviour towards their brothers during civil wars…



Comments:


1

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:35 | #

It is a great privilege to speak with Professor MacDonald. As I have said, his work, particularly his credible, calm and rational presentation of the powers behind the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act - as he is shown discussing in the late Byron Jost’s film - is what brought me into open White Activism. He has undoubtedly been a similar inspiration to many.

...  ...  ...
I had wanted the adjacent post, prior to the interview with MacDonald, to be the one showing the chart about African population growth..

                           
...displaying a concern and threat to all Europeans.

I would not want his image to appear along side Nazi imagery, even if critical. But that is the problem with the Hitler advocates. They force a response when and how one might not like. They are aggressive and on the offensive by design - a little too convinced that is the way to be, they are neither cunning nor respectful enough.

It is an unfortunate problem of communication wherein one is forced into a conflict - even where not inclined to view the other with malice, let alone intending to act as such - as provocation can turn relations into a reciprocally escalating diatribe. Your response is treated as aggressive and you are disingenuously depicted as the unreliable one compared to the good, innocent little Nazis - their advocates absurd, complete unanimity, as eternal victims and the ones of perfect virtue does not allow for a balanced negotiation of the facts of our mutual interest and responsibility.

It is an interesting problem and one that bears careful consideration.


2

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 29 Apr 2015 06:22 | #

                         
               
                       


                       


                       


3

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:06 | #

I found this conversation to be perhaps the most entertaining and enjoyable we have done.  It was particularly interesting to see a divide slowly opening up between my general approach to the problem of our survival and continuity, with its emphasis on mass consciousness, experience, holisticism, and essential thinking:

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/what_it_means_to_be_human_part_3

... and the approaches of Daniel and Prof MacDonald, which, while not being identical, were often rather well aligned, certainly in terms of rationality and cognitive elitism.  This was quite unexpected for me, and underlined once again how tough it is to be understood even by friends who know one’s thought well.

MacDonald was very good value, easy to talk to, and was never caught out for an answer.  I hope we will do a further programme with him over the next 12 months or so.


4

Posted by kablabla on Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:21 | #

I am saving this comment of katana’s, though I will probably not restore it. It is obfuscation. Readers can go to his site if they want to know his opinion. Here, there have been too many instances when significant matters were under discussion and all he would do is horn-in, obfuscate, suggest that “this was all nonsense” and impose talk about how flawless Hitler was.


5

Posted by Ask me if I care on Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:39 | #

Katana, yes, we don’t get how perfect Hitler was, how he had it figured-out perfectly.

“The three of you still don’t get it, but you will eventually, I hope.”

Katana, you don’t get it. Though you have tried to pretend it isn’t true before, there is NEVER a case where I am indulging in words for words sake and not getting to the point.

I am not confused, I know what I mean (I am not sure if it came across in the conversation or in the edit; haven’t had a chance to listen to it myself yet) but I know that you don’t want people to understand this because you are desperate for them to believe that they need your reverence for Hitler and that they need Hitler when they need neither. Thus, if I make a point, let alone a meaningful one, you are going to freak-out and post BOLD advertisements for Hitler’s anti-Bolshevism to obfuscate and divert from the fact.

Your god, Hitler, was not the only one against Bolshevism. He would not cooperate with others because he wanted their land.

You said that you were going to stick to your Nazi sites, now go to it. Nobody with half a wit wants to go there. You are a bore; everyone knows already what you are going to say: Hitler was perfect, the Nazis could do no wrong. There is nobody more tedious than you. Be glad your comment wasn’t deleted right away. Go fish in your own pond.


6

Posted by Multicultural organizationas in London on Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:46 | #

While looking something up for another post I came across a link of a list of Multicultural Organizations in one single London Borough, Kingston upon Thames. According to Wikipedia Kingston Upon Thames is 63% White British, the total population is 160,000.  It is also known for the coronation of ancient English Kings such as Athelstan and Ethelred The Unready. What in God’s name would Ethelred have made of this obvious attempt to genocide his people we can only guess at.

‘’ From 991 onwards, Æthelred paid tribute, or Danegeld, to the Danish king. In 1002, Æthelred ordered a massacre of Danish settlers.’‘

If Third World people need this amount of support to be able to live in one of the most affluent areas on earth then they obviously are not here for any other reason than to replace the natives, regardless of their undying love of the NHS and ‘‘The Economy’‘.

African and Caribbean Relatives and Residents Association Elders Project

Information and support for African Caribbean elders on sheltered housing, residential and nursing care. Advice for families, carers and professionals. Support for realities groups in Lambeth, Manchester and Birmingham. Publish a directory
of sheltered housing and residential care for African Caribbean elders and good practice guides on food, leisure resources and relatives involvement in homes.
5 Tavistock Place
London WC1H 9SN
Tel: 020 7692 4305
Fax: 020 7916 0515

African and Caribbean Voices Association
Reminiscence activities provided for and with elders from Africa (including Uganda, Nigeria, Sierra Leone) and the Caribbean (includind Dominica, Jamaica, St Kitts, St Lucia). Training in public speaking and presentation, story telling and writing and
internet training. Organise outings and reminiscence events at a range of venues and community centres.
Unit 3 Durning Hall
Earlham Grove
Newhamondon E7 9AB
Tel: 020 8536 3822

African Community Involvement Association
Provides information and support for people and families who are infected by HIV/AIDS, covering all areas affecting African people across the board within the borough of Kingston, at the Welcare Centre, every first Wednesday of each month and across other boroughs in South London.
Justin Plaza 3
Viceroy Suite 1
341 London Road
Mitcham
Surrey CR4 4BE
Tel: 020 8687 2400/0208 640 9479
Fax: 020 8646 4363
Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Website: http://www.acia-uk.org

African Families Support Services
Established to address issues relating to poverty, sickness, education, guidance, social exclusion, support and advice on social and health issues to African communities living in London, particularly refugees, asylum seekers, youth and those
affected by HIV / Aids.
Flat Afss, Chichester House
145a London Road
Kingston
Surrey KT2 6NH
Tel: 020 8974 9993
Fax: 020 8547 3139
Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Website: http://www.afss.org

Association for Sierra Leonean Refugees (ASLER)
Advice, advocacy, counselling and practical help for refugees, asylum seekers and migrants from Sierra Leone. Advice on benefits, housing, immigration and health. Interpreting and translation. Befriending and home support for older people and
their carers. Evening classes for disadvantaged African children and counselling sessions.
Unit B01
Macbean Centre
Macbean Street
London SE18 6LW
Tel: 020 8855 4681
Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
East African Women’s Organisation
59 School Lane
Surbiton
Surrey KT6 7QH
Tel: 020 8288 9135

Ghana Union London Umbrella organisation for 50 affiliated Ghanaian groups. Information and advice for the African communities on benefits, employment, housing, immigration, education, health and care services. Day services (at Ampthill Square TA Hall, Camden) for elderly and disabled people with games, music and social activities. Supplementary school for children.
431 Caledonian Road
London N7 9BG
Tel : 020 700 3225
Email : .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Ilawe-Ekiti Assocation UK (Nigerian State)
Social and advisory group for the Ilawe-Ekiti community in the UK. Advice on benefits, housing rights, Health, mental health, emotional and family problems. Limited home visiting, support and transport to appointments for older or frail members of the community. Social events, outings and an annual holiday.
152 Brooke Road
London N16 7RR
Tel : 020 8806 4097
Fax : 020 8806 4087

etc etc

:

http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-small-slice-of-england.html

 


7

Posted by Lindtner + Humphreys on Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:22 | #

Lindtner + Humphreys

Christian Lindtner and Kenneth Humphreys to appear in international conference:

  FYI: There will be an important international conference on the New Testament in Roskilde, Denmark on June 21-24, 2015

  Gospel Interpretation and Q-Hypothesis.


8

Posted by DanielS on Fri, 01 May 2015 04:39 | #

Greg Johnson and Hugh MacDonald (not to be confused with Prof. Kevin MacDonald) discuss: Vanity, Pretentiousness and Snobbery

http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/05/vanity-pretentiousness-and-snobbery/

You can get some value out of just about any Greg Johnson discussion. This one much less than others. Why? Because he is trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. More aptly, he is trying to compare incommensurate roles in the functional ecology of a racial system.

Greg wants very strongly to hold to the polemic of THE left as the enemy.

At least in so doing, in this discussion, he elaborates his motive for elitism and takes it farther in an effort to justify vanity, pretentiousness and snobbery.

Of course, in discussing these three vices, he misses the qualitative point, the spirit of the distinction of these vices which make them condemnable.

And in suggesting that he should be among an elite cadre he is only further exposing in this discussion why some might justifiably not wish to look upon him in that way.

However, there is another way to look at this matter of “elite capabilities, skill development” and processes of evolution:

There is common advice for racialists in WN circles - learn a trade, something like plumbing, electronics, mechanics..some skill that people need, where your politics are irrelevant and where people aren’t going to judge, or even ask you about personal matters.

Are these people better in some ways? Yes. Is what they are doing important and warranting respect? Of course.

I look upon Greg’s work in having analyzed a myriad of texts and his certifiable skill in parsing philosophers and philosophical matters as an invaluable task - one which is technically neutral enough, like mechanics, that it makes personal life, even his obnoxious elitist politics, far less important than his helpful orientation on these technical matters

Greg has a qualitative niche, an important part, in a White leftist scheme. One would hope that would be enough.

As everyone, there are ways in which Greg could be looked upon as suspect of being worthy to occupy a commanding presence among an elite cadre on a permanent basis to look after us all - including in important matters of judgment. This very discussion betrays that, when so often the perspective that he is inclined to value only plays into that which has gotten us into this mess in the first place. I won’t dredge up my arguments with what has been his security blanket of “the greatest statesman, Hitler”, Dyal, Nietzshe, and the perspective toward an overvaluation of a view toward men that some of the guys over there at CC take, but there is a serious implication that his judgement might not best be accepted as above all. Still, I can accept him as having an important place and providing invaluable advice. I’d be reluctant to accept his position and judgements as abiding and binding across the board, on all matters.

That is not to say that accomplished academics should not feel good about and be rewarded accordingly to what they do better than other folks; and they may or may not be above vulgar vices of others. But others are likely to have skills and abilities, which play into both individual and full systemic judgment and orientation, that are invaluable to systemic maintenance and should be accorded respect and honor.

It is disrespectful and a serious error of discouraging participation to polemicize against the union of European people and its incentives for participation - looking for defects to exclude people rather than looking for value in members; and justice - and propose that some people, like the wonderous Dyal (who doesn’t find White men cute enough) should have some fixed, quantitative role above others.

It has nothing to do with equality and inequality.

Anti-egalitarianism or being against “equality” is to play into a false and destructive paradigm, a Jewish trap as surely as any.

We are dealing with qualitative issues of commensurability and incommensurability or we are playing a fools language game, doing the bidding of Jews and the very objectivist traitors who sold us out to begin with.


9

Posted by Funky Town on Fri, 01 May 2015 07:01 | #

On the other hand, qualities would determine what is below standard as well.

Why anybody should have been subject to “Funky Town”, ever, let alone have to hear it repeatedly on the public air waves would be unintelligible were it not for what we now know of the YKW:

I was reminded of this having heard it (bellowing from a restaurant onto a Poznan street!) just moments ago…

“Won’t you take me to funky town”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liuCTk2nPG8

Another abuse of the public air has been:

“Boogie Nights”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XEmFuEbpzM

“Dance with the boogie get down…got to keep on dancin’, keep on dancin”

How could it be that one has to hear this?

It calls for ostracism from community standards.

It creates a strange and alienating environment. Beyond hostile - it is torture…then when we get into the strains of rap music, we are talking anti-White war music - an even more extreme of alien and hostile environment is created.


10

Posted by Creative protest of London Hasidics to be May 2 on Fri, 01 May 2015 11:07 | #

Stamford Hill and the Campaign against the “Jewification of Britain”
May 1, 2015 — Enza Ferreri

Until a few years, or even one year, ago I wouldn’t have believed that an anti-Jewish —(not anti-Israel) mass protest by Whites (not by Muslims) could have taken place in Britain.

And yet, a march against the “Jewification of Great Britain” was planned by Joshua Bonehill, the 22-year-old leader of National Liberation. Scheduled for 22 March, it was called “Liberate Stamford Hill”, after an area of north-east London home to about 20,000 Jews. This is a poster of the proposed demo, which according to The Guardian was reading: “On 22nd of March as one white and unified mass movement we will be finally pointing the finger in the right direction … You owe it to your race white man.

The namesake Facebook page of the campaign appearing on the poster has been removed, and if you search it on FB you’ll end up with its opposite: “Liberate Stamford Hill from Fascists”.

The poster shows the photos of two phenomena appearing in the streets of Stamford Hill that the White Nationalists oppose: a member of the Shomrim, the corporate Jewish Police that started patrolling the neighbourhood in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attacks on Jews, and a Jewish sign telling women on which side of the road they should walk.

The campaign’s Twitter account has also been taken down. Since announcing the Liberate Stamford Hill march, Bonehill and other 5 of its organisers have been arrested, with 3 of them banned from entering London.

As a result, the protest has been postponed to May 2. This is, as the Daily Bale News website puts it, “due to unprecedented mass abuse of police powers previously never applied to the Jewish EDL”, a reference to the Jewish connections of the pro-Israel English Defence League, whose target has mostly been Islam.

But Stamford Hill has not been quiet in recent times. On the planned day of the postponed protest, a group of over 20 men and women stormed a synagogue in the area. The blog Endzog reported:

  Six indigenous white Fascists from the new fascist movement Liberate also known as ‘National Liberation’ protesting against the Jewish Occupation of Britain have been arrested after an antisemitic attack by 20 Liberate and associated activists at a synagogue in the Jewish Occupied settlement and mini theocratic state of Stamford Hill North London — leaving one Jew needing minor hospital treatment after Jews turned violent in the fracas.

  As Jews have used their huge financial power to buy up properties in the area over the years, the indigenous people have been gradually forced out. Meanwhile Jewish MPs and Jewish controlled local councils have brought several million 3rd world immigrants into London to ethnically cleanse it of English people.

A small demo organised by other nationalist groups did take place in Stamford Hill on 18th April.

Another possibly related episode concerns a store in Tottenham, another district in north London, belonging to the mobile (or cell) phone giant company EE. Staff at the shop refused to give phone chargers to at least two Orthodox Jewish men wearing traditional attire.

Assistant manager Daniel Reid was contacted by The Jewish Chronicle and reportedly told the paper: “There is no discrimination in our business. I am black and Christian. I am not being funny, Jewish people are very arrogant but we serve them to the best of our ability. I do find them arrogant.”

The allegation of “arrogance” is interesting, because it is not isolated. In July 2010 Christina Patterson, a Stamford Hill resident who was for ten years until 2013 a journalist on the staff of The Independent, wrote a column, “The limits of multi-culturalism”, in which she complained of the bad manners of the Hasidic Jews living in her neighbourhood:

  I would like to say to the man from whom I bought some paper cups, and who handled my money as if it had been dipped in anthrax, that it wouldn’t kill him to say “please” or “thank you”, and I would like to say to the fishmonger who asked my (black) friend whether he really wanted to buy some fish from his shop, that you should probably assume that if someone is asking for fish in your shop, then the answer is in the affirmative.

  And I would like to say to the little boy who sat bang in the middle of two seats on the bus and who, when I tried to sit next to him, leapt up as if infection from the ebola virus was imminent, that it does slightly make one feel like a pariah, and I would like to say to the women who roam the streets with double-decker pushchairs and vast armies of children, that it’s sometimes nice to allow someone else to get past, and I would like to say to all these people that I don’t care if they wear frock-coats, and funny suits and hats covered in plastic bags, and insist on wearing their hair in ringlets (if they’re male) or covered up by wigs (if they’re female), but I do think they could treat their neighbours with a bit more courtesy and just a little bit more respect.

  When I moved to Stamford Hill, 12 years ago, I didn’t realise that goyim were about as welcome in the Hasidic Jewish shops as Martin Luther King at a Klu Klux Klan convention. I didn’t realise that a purchase by a goy was a crime to be punished with monosyllabic terseness, or that bus seats were a potential source of contamination, or that road signs, and parking restrictions, were for people who hadn’t been chosen by God. And while none of this is a source of anything much more than irritation, when I see an eight-year-old boy recoiling from a normal-looking woman (because, presumably, he has been taught that she is dirty or dangerous, or, heaven forbid, dripping with menstrual blood) it makes me sad…

  [T]here’s nothing in the Torah to say that…  goyim should be treated with contempt.

There certainly is in the Talmud.

Hasidic Jews of Stamford Hill, North London:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVsc_7nodlM

  There are now estimated to be around 1.3m Haredi [of which Hasidim are a part] worldwide, and according to a 2007 study by Dr Yaakov Wise at the University of Manchester, strictly-orthodox Jewry in Europe is expanding more rapidly than at any time since before the Second World War. In Britain — home to the largest Haredi community in Europe — almost three out of every four Jewish births are in the Haredi community. If current trends continue, the strictly-Orthodox will constitute the majority of British Jews by 2050. [Emphasis added]

High birth rates are something we normally associate with Muslims.


The similarities between Islam and Judaism, both of which are particularist and supremacist doctrines, full of contempt for those who don’t believe in them, are astounding. Indeed, the comments on the behavior of Hasidic Jews in London echo the notorious behavior of Hasidic Jews in Postville, Iowa. They had no interest in developing social ties with their new neighbors or conform to community norms..


There are also similarities between Muslim and Jewish communities living in Britain and in Western countries generally, and the problems they cause


..both have a different ethical code for the treatment of ingroup and outgroup members (“What you do to the goyim is not the same as what you do to Jews”); both are obsessed with purity and with not being contaminated by the impure kaffir or goyim; both consider kaffir or goyim not quite human and think that these outsiders’ purpose is to be their own slaves; both have ways of separating men from women and consider contact between the sexes to be avoided; both have arranged marriages; both have their own courts; both have their own police. Both, in short, are Middle Eastern cultures.

Full article at TOO: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/05/stamford-hill-and-the-campaign-against-the-jewification-of-britain/

 


11

Posted by White Argentinian on Fri, 01 May 2015 18:45 | #

William Johnson interviews a Southern woman who rejects feminism but defends White woman against anti-woman exaggerations typical of WN.

I believe it was this same woman who had previously said something which made me angry, namely that “non-Whites have all of South America.”

Thankfully, in this show, Johnson invites an Argentinian man named Augustine to set the record straight.


http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/american-freedom-party-talk-show-4-30-15/


Keep your electric eye on me, babe - check out the audience: White English women in rapture.


12

Posted by Jews, Muslims allied against Europe on Sat, 02 May 2015 10:15 | #

Jews and Muslims as allied brothers against Europe:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7zoPu6wbrI

Good comment by Franklin Ryckaert at TOO
May 1, 2015 - 1:52 am | Permalink

Judaism and Islam have indeed many similarities, as the author of this article has indicated. (She could also have mentioned the similarities between Jewish Halacha and Islamic Fiqh as their respective legal systems are called).

There are however some crucial differences :

Judaism is an exclusive ethnic religion, to which conversion is discouraged. Islam is an inclusive universal religion, bent on converting the whole world. Both religions are supremacist in orientation, but they differ in strategy. Judaism, being a minority religion, has developed a cunning stealthy elite strategy. Islam, being a majority religion, has developed a vulgar violent mob strategy. Both religions have become highly successful. The Jews have become the hidden (and hostile!) elite of the whole Western world, while the Muslims have conquered by sheer violence and a high birthrate a considerable part of the world. The Jewish strategy is high IQ, the Muslim strategy is low IQ.

Though they quarrel in the Middle East over a territorial dispute, in the Western diaspora they are inclined to cooperate in their conflict with Christian Europeans, like they did in Muslim Spain and in the Ottoman Empire.

It is an illusion to think that either one of them can be our ally in a conflict with the other.”


13

Posted by "Far Right" protest Hasidics on Sat, 02 May 2015 15:00 | #

Far right plans march against ‘Jewification of Britain’ in Stamford Hill

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/far-right-plans-march-against-jewification-of-britain-in-stamford-hill-10017859.html

Anti-fascists have pledged to stop far-right nationalists who plan to march through an area of London with a large Jewish population.

Organisers claim to be fighting against what they call the “Jewification” of the UK, and a civilian security group run by volunteers from the Hasidic Jewish community in London.


14

Posted by Cohen's BBC programming on Sat, 02 May 2015 15:08 | #


15

Posted by unpc dowunder on Sat, 02 May 2015 23:31 | #

Over the last decade or so, the alternative right has tended to divide into two camps - those who emphasis the Jewish role in anti-white thinking and those who blame North European liberalism. Regardless of which side has the stronger argument we still need to explain why whites have been so receptive to arguments based on individualism (whether pushed by Jews or gentiles) and radical egalitarianism (as opposed to just class-based economic egalitarianism).

Hence, it’s great to see the debate moving onto the reasons for the vulnerability of whites to individualistic liberal thinking. I think part of the reason for the sudden, dramatic shift to liberalism (both right and left wing) has been the decline of Southern European cultural influence among North Europeans.

Classics (and therefore the ideas of the Ancient Greeks and Romans) are no longer taught much to western elites, Catholicism is declining, Aristotle is no longer really seen as a great intellectual, and fascism is regarded as totally without positive qualities (as opposed to being a mixed bag of good an bad ideas that was pushed too far). The Italians and French also lost a lot of cultural status among Americans and North Europeans after their their association with fascism and their poor showing in WWII (which made them look corrupt, nepotistic and cowardly). Hence they no longer have the same kind of cultural influence they had before WWII.


The result of this has been that individualistic North European and Jewish thinkers have had too much cultural influence, while more ethnocentric (and Jew savvy) Southern and Central European thinkers (from Aristotle, right through to modern ““Archeofuturists”) haven’t had much impact.

 


16

Posted by Behind Baltimore on Sun, 03 May 2015 01:23 | #

Keith Alexander and James Edwards provide and informative take on the Baltimore riots and the powers-that-be aiding and abetting them.

http://lnrlive.com/tpc/tpc20150502a.mp3


17

Posted by Jews develop blacks as revolutionaries on Sun, 03 May 2015 18:47 | #

E. Michael Jones: Jews turned blacks into revolutionaries to overthrow the government of The United States; from inception of revolutionary spirit in The N.A.A.C.P. to the government’s successful overthrow by means of the “Civil Rights” movement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7l_da7b2jg;


18

Posted by "Left" as anti:national/ tradition, class divisive on Sun, 03 May 2015 19:28 | #

“The Left” unnecessarily construed as anti-national, anti-traditional and class divisive in Collin Liddell’s

“The First Leftist Genocide of The Twentieth Century”


I reject as facile and obstructive to White organization these distinctions that Colin Liddell makes:

“Liberals and Leftists have an built-in tendency to veer towards a “dictatorship of the proletariat” mentality — the desire to take power on behalf on the “less fortunate” and “less enlightened,” in order to make the radical changes they feel are necessary.”

It is not built-in. And what we would be basically “dictatorial” about is the border surrounding the whole people, not just the workers and the unfortunate.

The central commitment to a false either/or that has gained convention in journalese and has been exploited by Jewish interests to prevent the effective unionization of our interests as Whites:

“within the context of Turkish politics, it was clearly a left-leaning anti-nationalist organization”

There is no reason why a left, i.e., a unionization, has to be anti-traditional, anti-national or pitting less fortunate against more fortunate. On the contrary, it can facilitate accountability to these interests all around.


19

Posted by Systemic maintenance requirement on Sun, 03 May 2015 21:46 | #

http://age-of-treason.com/2015/04/28/fear-and-loathing-and-treason-part-1/#comment-14336

And Tan, this is one of the reasons why monocausality is to be avoided. It makes one myopic in a world that should be investigated processually.

The Jews as the “every problem “will be used by Hitler worshipers as a part of their desperation to justify his program across the board - which translates to antagonizing and dividing most of Europe.

There is no need to be paranoid that someone is necessarily trying to distract from the JQ if they are taking care of and understanding their own system, including its susceptiblities.

Jews have predominant influence in 7 key niches and vigilance must be turned most often to these elite positions: religion, finance, law, media, business (esp. international), academia and politics.

The problem that I can see with a term such as “pathological altruism” is that it is a psychologism - too narrowly packed onto the psyche rather than looked upon in social terms, which would be the more fruitful investigation - and again, both our positive maintenance and problems ought to be looked upon as an engaged, interactive, reflexive and ongoing social process.

Fine, we look at the Jews as most crucial among problems, but we have our own system to take care of as well.

Recognizing our susceptibilities does not let the Jews off the hook for exploiting these openings.

In the service of defending our system and not getting caught up in mere reaction to Jews, I am satisfied that my structuring (which Katana dishonestly tries to say is obfuscatory) of two problems - Jewish interests on the one hand and objectivism on the other - provides a good, orientative balance (in particular, we need to correct objectivism with acknowledgment of the validity of our relative group interests). Objectivism, which would outstrip that, carried to its logical extreme, is both compelling as a means to power and as a means to get beyond guilt, but is easily exploited by Jews.

To problematize not only the Jews, but objectivism by contrast to our relative systemic interests, is a necessary corrective in favor of ecology and accountability to historical/systemic maintenance against what is now an ancient habit for Europeans for objectivism (which is susceptible and weak on agentive deliberation).



*I understand Katana’s problem. To him, hermeneutic process is “waffling” when we should all just fall in line behind Hitler.


20

Posted by n/a on Sun, 03 May 2015 22:08 | #

GW,

How often does anyone besides DanielS still post here? How many people still regularly read? I don’t know what your goal was in handing over MR to DanielS, but unless it was to drive away everyone except DanielS, I don’t think it’s succeeded.

I understand you don’t like Nazis, and DanielS doesn’t like Nazis. But (1) re: the interview, I think you’re completely misguided in believing you must somehow win an internet battle with those who sympathize with WWII Germany before your brand of nationalism can be ascendant. If you won the heart and mind of every pro-Nazi WN on the internet, you still will not have begun to reach the number of people you’ll need to reach to achieve any real success. So it would make sense to me to simply ignore the former and focus on the overwhelming majority of the population who are not pro-Nazi internet WNs. The left did not win power by first stamping out every fringe leftist movement. (2) Even if you choose to continue with this misguided quest, I don’t think someone like DanielS is going to change anyone’s mind (if anything, he’s probably pushed more people in the opposite direction).


DanielS,

“I would not want his image to appear along side Nazi imagery, even if critical. But that is the problem with the Hitler advocates. They force a response when and how one might not like.”

No, no one forced you to post anything. If you don’t want to come across as deranged, stop posting deranged responses to people who in the broader picture are irrelevant.

I would also suggest not spamming the comments of every post with links. Start an open thread and post the links there, so that if anyone besides you and GW are left here, they have a chance to have on-topic discussions without being drowned out by you.


21

Posted by DanielS on Sun, 03 May 2015 22:32 | #

GW,

How often does anyone besides DanielS still post here? How many people still regularly read? I don’t know what your goal was in handing over MR to DanielS, but unless it was to drive away everyone except DanielS, I don’t think it’s succeeded.

n/a, this is your wishful thinking and obviously not true. All one has to do is look upon the interviews that we’ve conducted in the last few months.

Next, we are still in the process of making changes. We should be adding a new and fine writer shortly.

I understand you don’t like Nazis, and DanielS doesn’t like Nazis.

Good, I’m glad you understand that. Too bad you didn’t bother to read what I’ve written above before trying to bury it as if its worthless.


But (1) re: the interview, I think you’re completely misguided in believing you must somehow win an internet battle with those who sympathize with WWII Germany before your brand of nationalism can be ascendant.

We are not trying to win the battle with them, we are distinguishing ourselves from them for whom it may concern (i.e., normal people, who are put off by Hitler and Nazism).

Not only is that not misguided, it is crucial that people have this platform available.

If you won the heart and mind of every pro-Nazi WN on the internet, you still will not have begun to reach the number of people you’ll need to reach to achieve any real success.

I can’t speak for GW, but I am not trying to win them over. They have their own holes to crawl in.


So it would make sense to me to simply ignore the former and focus on the overwhelming majority of the population who are not pro-Nazi internet WNs.

We will, but it has been necessary to mark this distinction at least for a time.


The left did not win power by first stamping out every fringe leftist movement. (2) Even if you choose to continue with this misguided quest, I don’t think someone like DanielS is going to change anyone’s mind (if anything, he’s probably pushed more people in the opposite direction).

That is your wish, but won’t be true. There are three kinds or four kinds who would have a problem with me. Nazi and Jesus people, of course. But they have other places to go. There might be Nordicist snobs who don’t like me but there is a mistake in that, because I do advocate maintaining their distinction.

There is another kind who may feel that they are beyond me intellectually. To this kind I would reply that I do not reject people or send them away because they may be sharper or more accomplished than me. On the contrary, I welcome them to participate and show us how its done.

If what they have to say is any good, I’d be inclined to turn it into a lead post.

DanielS,

“I would not want his image to appear along side Nazi imagery, even if critical. But that is the problem with the Hitler advocates. They force a response when and how one might not like.”

No, no one forced you to post anything.

Listen buddy, the kind of bs that Truck Roy was putting across in that very popular podcast required a rebut.

And nobody forced Stormfront to choose its obvious name, with its allusion reinforced by obvious typeface.


If you don’t want to come across as deranged, stop posting deranged responses to people who in the broader picture are irrelevant.

Stormfront is the most popular White Nationalist website. It is necessary to distinguish MR from its errors. Nothing deranged about it. Your comments are way off the mark.


I would also suggest not spamming the comments of every post with links. Start an open thread and post the links there, so that if anyone besides you and GW are left here, they have a chance to have on-topic discussions without being drowned out by you.

Thanks for the “well meaning” advice. Now take it and go start a blog of your own. Since we are so hopeless here, you don’t have to worry about us.


22

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 04 May 2015 03:37 | #

To problematize not only the Jews, but objectivism by contrast to our relative systemic interests, is a necessary corrective in favor of ecology and accountability to historical/systemic maintenance; against what is now an ancient habit for Europeans of objectivism (which is susceptible and weak on agentive deliberation).


Hermeneutics, European hemeneutics, was devised as a part of that corrective process; although GW did have a point in this conversation that it can have perils as well if not managed properly or taken into the wrong hands. Its empirical end is meant to offset wild speculation; also acting as systemic corrective is inclusion of the perspective of those temporarily marginalized. Marginal participation and perspective would imply those just within the borders of the system but having interest in its maintenance. In addition to wildly exaggerating the speculative end of hermeneutics, Jewish interests have perverted the notion of “marginal” participation - treating those without the system and interested in its transformation as being the marginals in need of advocacy.


23

Posted by Tanstaafl's paranoia on Wed, 06 May 2015 00:08 | #

Tanstaafl’s paranoia:

Age of Treason Radio
Fear and Loathing and Treason – Part 2

http://age-of-treason.com/category/age-of-treason-radio/

Tan says:

“Monocausalism” (like Johnson’s “monomania”) is just another way of saying craaazy “anti-semitism”. Use your brain and make an argument.”

Wrong, Tan. 

Think about what I am saying: we will do best to set about with two poles, one Jewish, the other our susceptibility for objectivism (objectivism as opposed to looking after our relative group interests as we should). From there, we may attend to Jewish power and influence and our systemic maintenance most often; and in process attend to other problems as well - other non-White imposers and traitors high and low.

You may not like the term monocuasalism* and it may be used by people who are trying to distract from the J.Q., but there is NO suggestion here that we are crazy and that Jews are not hostile, powerful antagonists requiring acute and priority focus (again, keeping ongoing and most frequent vigil with regard to 7 key niches, while perhaps not giving them ALL attention ALL of the time).

Next, you quote the feeble minded and dishonest Katana to concur where he is totally wrong:

“4 May 2015 at 12:57 pm

  I think your writings are unclear because your thinking is unclear, because your language is unclear, being filled with abstractions and jargon. An example of that…

I concur. And good example.”

Totally wrong.

I am clear in what I think**, and clear enough in how I say it for anyone, but perhaps those, like Katana, who want to believe in Hitler’s perfection (and for people to not hear what people like myself are saying).

Tan, the messiness, the less than perfectly clear causality of the multi-interactive social world must be why you prefer to cite John Friend (with his neat but absurd conspiracy theories to explain all) as a definitive authority.

What you do in focusing on Jews is a good thing, but you are taking it to paranoia when you suggest that someone (e.g. myself) is not using his brain and trying to obfuscate the Jewish role when he looks at our susceptibilities and philosophical corrections thereof.

I can hope for better from you, but if you are endorsing Katana’s BS and John Friend, then perhaps the William Pierce perspective has you held too captive to let go.
 
William Pierce was smart, but we can do better. Indeed, we must.


* Actually, I did not have Tan, or anyone in particular, in mind when chiding “computer nerds” as being susceptible to anti-social explanations, but come to think of it, I believe that Tan is a computer guy. Therefore, he may have an additional proclivity to “monocausality” because, as a computer person, one is involved with technology, looking at transmission circuits for THE place where the circuit is broken. Whereas the social world, of praxis, is multi-interactive, agentive and reflexive (factual terms which he would be inclined to look upon as “jargon” because they do not fit his computer training discipline).

Not that computer training is the only thing playing into monocausality or even that there is anything wrong with focusing on the Jews; but that he is taking too myopoic a perspective and that (computer training) might be one factor.. 


** And I can prove that I am clear in what I think by answering in clarification of any question that you could have for me about what I’ve said.


24

Posted by Nathanial's solutions in 3 min. KM in Cesspool on Sun, 10 May 2015 01:14 | #

Dr. MacDonald elaborates his concept of pathological altruism, noting the integral role of the wish/need to conform to moral rules in the phenomenon:

http://lnrlive.com/tpc/tpc20150509c.mp3

Also, Brother Nathanial - solutions to Jewish imposed White dispossession in three minutes. His conservative proposals:

Problem:

Economy - tanked

Wall Street - Jewish finance capital has shipped manufacturing jobs to China and hightech jobs to/for India. Middle class is sunk.

Fix:

Slap tariff on China made products / lower business tax rates here.

This stops Jewish Wall Street’s treason and our jobs come back home.

Problem:

Elections - democracy reward to highest bidder, Jews own both parties

Republicans kiss the arse of Sheldon Adelson (Nathanial doesn’t tell you that they don’t mind throwing one Jewish billionaire under the bus, whether it is Adelson or Soros, in order to distract from and defend the systemic pattern structure) and Democrats suck-up to AIPAC….even little Rand grovels to the Jews.

Fix:

Register AIPAC as a foreign government agent and ban their campaign contributions.

Then push Congress to pass the “We The People Amendment” that caps campaign spending to persons only and bans corporations from buying elections. Under the Act, rights under the Constitution belong to people, not PACs and corporations.

Problem:

Media - Jews own CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN

They decide who will live and who will die.

They ignored Ron Paul and smeared Pat Buchanan (Nathanial doesn’t mention that their platforms are easy foils). This time, your choice, I mean their choice, will be Hillary Bush or Jeb Clinton

Fix:

Restrict electioneering to a publicly funded national media forum, giving all candidates equal time. This stops Jewish bias and democracy comes back home.

Problem:

Money - Jewish bankers own the money-creating franchise called the Federal Reserve. They loan money to the government and gouge us with interest.

Fix:

Put the power of issuing money back into the hands of government as mandated by our Constitution.

This stops the Jewish banking cabal and our sovereignty is restored.

Problem:

Culture - the Supreme Court with four Jews favoring same-sex unions is about to redefine marriage; this results in a polarized country and weakens moral resolve.

Fix:

Restrict the percentage of representation.

Jews make up less than 2% of the population and yet they have 45% representation on our highest bench. A reset would trash them all save one. Sotomeyor could stay until we limit judicial terms of office.

America is in trouble and everyone knows it. My fix is in. Make it happen, and we’ve got a fighting chance.

Brother Nathanial’s suggestions provide some helpful clarity, but are far too late, giving conservative advice which, at this point, could only preserve, foster and prolong the agony of non-White demographic infestation and take-over; along with international Jewish and corporate power niches.

...........................
Besides the gawd-thumping, an additional caveat for the endemic Southern habit of bragadocia.


25

Posted by J Expression vs Regulation on Wed, 13 May 2015 00:11 | #

Gene expression rather than top down gene regulation

At Majority Rights nine years ago, Bowery wrote this critique of MacDonald’s theory:

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/my_disagreement_with_kevin_macdonalds_theory_of_judaism_as_a_group_evolutio/

Basically suggesting that the evolution of severe Jewish ethnocentric behavior is more an expression of genes seeking dominance than a result of top-down control (though he does acknowledge that plays a part too).

Expression of dominant genes explains why they ravage Whites where benign though recessive hosts and promote other middle easterners and Africans despite not fairing as well or even worse against them genetically: i.e., Bowery held that their group strategy is more an expression of dumb genetic mechanism than top down craft:

I frequently find myself in the ironic position of defending a theory with which I disagree:  Kevin MacDonald’s theory of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy.  This is because, although I think it isn’t correct, his theory is coherent, important and continually attacked through misrepresentation—usually by mis-defining “group evolutionary strategy”.  In other words, they disagree with his theory by refusing to address it.  By contrast I differ as to its degree of relevance to Jewish history.  Specifically, I disagree with this statement of MacDonald’s: “Fundamental to Jewish group integrity over historical time have been social controls and ideologies that depend ultimately on human abilities to monitor and enforce group goals, to create ideological structures that rationalize group aims both to group members and to outsiders, and to indoctrinate group members to identify with the group and its aims.”   I don’t disagree this group evolutionary strategy has played a significant role in the evolution of Jewry but I do not believe it is fundamental to Jewish group (particularly genetic) integrity over historical time.  My working hypothesis is that group cohesion is sufficiently valuable as a defense of individual genetic interest that it exists among all in their environment of evolutionary adaptation and a primary mode of group conflict is, not so much in direct competition for resources, but in the very genetic expression of group genetic interests.  In other words, we’re seeing a battle carried out over the expression of genetic self-interest.  This is much as a host and parasite struggle over whether the host is to express his own genetic self-interest or the interest of the parasite’s genes.  The fundamental reason Jews thrived in European populations is because they were genetically dominant over those populations and hence their group phenotypes won the struggle for expression in the resulting human ecologies.  This contrasts with their fate among populations with comparable or greater genetic dominance to Jews, such as in the Middle East and Africa.  This also explains how Jews have continued to behave self-destructively with respect to immigration, civil rights and other movements benefiting, at the expense of Jews, those populations.

by James Bowery on Sunday, May 7, 2006 at 04:27 PM in


Posted by ben tillman on May 08, 2006, 12:21 AM |

I do not view your and MacDonald’s theories as incompatible.

I agree

Another good comment, rather good questions, from Ben Tillman

Posted by ben tillman on May 08, 2006, 01:34 AM | #

What is the mechanism the gene expression is controlled?

Well done, Random—you have gotten to the point in four words.

What is the mechanism?

How does the dominant allele control the recessive within a chromosome?

How does the dominant allele control the recessive when they are not in the same chromosome but in different human bodies?

Why can’t a cohesive group of humans be part of that mechanism?


I would like to locate MacDonald’s precise response to this proposition: that self destructive policies of Jews are better explained as a result of sheer genetic mechanism. I have heard it several times now and I imagine that MacDonald would argue that Jewish genetic imperviousness pursues self destructive policies which are only somewhat inconsistent with top-down directives for group self interest - but in the broader picture, they are not inconsistent with Jewish group interests, as they are shedding the weak and the disloyal - those less ethnocentric, who will not cleave to Israel and the center of the Jewish group.


Posted by random commenter on May 08, 2006, 12:42 AM | #

James,
What is the mechanism the gene expression is controlled?  Is this a memetic war- comparable to Adbuster’s complaints against corporations?  If so, resistance to advertising goes with schooling and a good physics education makes one an anti-Semite.


Posted by James Bowery on May 08, 2006, 03:30 AM | #

random commenter writes: What is the mechanism the gene expression is controlled?

Well that is the current question before biologists since they seem to find that regulation of gene expression is the primary function of genetic differences between humans and other species.  My expectation is that this holds for genetic differences among humans as well.

Certainly memes, despite being replicators, are themselves potentially extended phenotypes of genes.  The regulation of their expression is therefore subject to mechanisms that have much in common with the mechanisms that regulate other phenotypes

 


26

Posted by Milken's nose 4 $: because air is free on Thu, 14 May 2015 13:11 | #

“Give me the power to issue the currency and I care not who makes the laws”

David Duke show Date: 05-14-15

The Federal Reserve, the 2008 bail-out and insider trading..

Distinguishing the capitalist system from the free enterprise system

Yiddish speaking Broker Randy Newman: “outlawing advanced information is like trying to outlaw air - its always going to happen in this situation.”

And obviously, if you know in advance what is going to happen in the markets you can breed enormous money from the real wealth that’s behind it.

There are always some people who know in advance what is going to happen, and if information is passed on by a tribal basis it is very hard to track. With Jewish infiltration of government and private institutions they can easily pass on advanced information and bypass insider trading laws. People can make millions and trillions of dollars in the stock market with advanced information.

If you know in advance, e.g., that Lockheed Martin is going to produce certain missiles…

Or if it is known that the Fed chairman is going to lower interest rates then they know that this will cause the weakening of the dollar and they could go to other currencies; even purchasing Calls and Puts on the dollar in advance.

Government needs to regulate to some extent and referee against mega corporations who can take a temporary hit and under price smaller businesses (one of the flaws of Ayn Randism), putting them out of business. Huge Corporations running amok this way thwarts the true nature of free enterprise, with money begetting money, rather than the best products and prices winning out. If private companies get to the point where they can become a monopoly, that is as dangerous to people as the state running a monopoly, maybe more so, because the state may have at least common interest with the people wheres the private company has only on interest, its narrow own, often to the sacrifice of the people as a whole.

Regarding insider trading, small events and news can effect movements for a short interval (nowadays, with electronic trading, even just a fraction of a second is enough) that can make a big difference in an exchange. Manipulation of news with rumors and such and trades made on manipulated information allows for money breeding; this takes real value out of the market and people’s investments; the traders are then able to go out and buy real assets with the absconded money. The cost to society is enormous.

Soros’s manipulation of the Asian markets was responsible for the Malaysian meltdown in the 1990s.

In the 1986, one of the biggest stock market scandals in history: Levine, Seagal, Bosky and Milken were charged with insider trading of stocks worth billions.

Bosky was fined 100 million.

Millions in fines were paid by Milken but he still came out enormously wealthy. In 1987 he made 550 million dollars. This one guy made more than all of the top 41 Fortune 500 corporations earned that year.

They were guilty of one of the greatest financial frauds since the Rothschilds but with Jewish lawyers and judges they serves light sentences for their crimes.

...his tribe came together to do damage control so that Jews were not seen as profiteers. Those Jews who helped soften the blow went on to gain key positions.

On Wikipedia, junk bond king Milken is also called a philanthropist because he funnels a great deal of this money to Jewish causes…

Federal Reserve, EU, The World Bank, IMF and just about every major industrial country and therefore in lesser, beholden counties Jews remain key to financial issues.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


27

Posted by Milken's nose for money: because air is free on Thu, 14 May 2015 13:12 | #

“Give me the power to issue the currency and I care not who makes the laws”

David Duke show Date: 05-14-15

The Federal Reserve, the 2008 bail-out (biggest theft ever, including Golman-Sachs dumping of worthless derivatives while selling them to others - “insurance of securities” on top of high risk housing loan bonds - largely forced loans to minorities through groups like Obama’s ACORN) and insider trading..

Distinguishing the capitalist system from the free enterprise system

Yiddish speaking Broker Randy Newman: “outlawing advanced information is like trying to outlaw air - its always going to happen in this situation.”

And obviously, if you know in advance what is going to happen in the markets you can breed enormous money from the real wealth that’s behind it.

There are always some people who know in advance what is going to happen, and if information is passed on by a tribal basis it is very hard to track. With Jewish infiltration of government and private institutions they can easily pass on advanced information and bypass insider trading laws. People can make millions and trillions of dollars in the stock market with advanced information.

If you know in advance, e.g., that Lockheed Martin is going to produce certain missiles…or if it is known that the Fed chairman is going to lower interest rates then you know that this will cause the weakening of the dollar and you could go to other currencies; even purchasing Calls and Puts on the dollar in advance.

Government needs to regulate to some extent and referee against mega corporations who can take a temporary hit and underprice smaller businesses (one of the flaws of Ayn Randism), putting them out of business. Huge Corporations running amok this way thwart the true nature of free enterprise, with money begetting money, rather than the best products and prices winning out. If private companies get to the point where they can become a monopoly, that is as dangerous to people as the state running a monopoly, maybe more so, because the state may have at least common interest with the people wheres the private company has only one interest, its narrow own, often to the sacrifice of the people as a whole.

Regarding insider trading, small events and news can effect movements for a short interval (nowadays, with electronic trading, even just a fraction of a second is enough) that can make a big difference in an exchange. Manipulation of news with rumors and such and trades made on manipulated information allows for money breeding; this takes real value out of the market and people’s investments; the traders are then able to go out and buy real assets with the absconded money. The cost to society is enormous.

Soros’s manipulation of markets was responsible for the Malaysian meltdown in the 1990s. In 1986, one of the biggest stock market scandals in history: Levine, Seagal, Bosky and Milken were charged with insider trading of stocks worth billions.
                                       
          Bosky (lower right) pleaded guilty and was fined 100 million. Millions in fines were paid by Milken (lower left) but he still came out enormously wealthy. In 1987 he made 550 million dollars. This one guy made more than all of the top 41 Fortune 500 corporations earned that year.

They were guilty of one of the greatest financial frauds since the Rothschilds but through Jewish lawyers and judges they served light sentences for their crimes.

...their tribe came together to do damage control so that Jews were not seen as profiteers. Those Jews who helped soften the blow went on to gain key positions.

On Wikipedia, junk bond king Milken is also called a philanthropist because he funnels a great deal of this money to Jewish causes…

The Federal, EU, World Bank, IMF and just about every major industrial country and therefore in lesser, beholden counties, Jews remain key to financial issues.


28

Posted by MacDonald on Sun, 17 May 2015 17:54 | #

MacDonald’s most recent interview - this one at Red Ice:

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/05/RIR-150515.php


29

Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 17 May 2015 21:04 | #

Daniel, before you wedge your head any further up your own keister with all this talk of “hermeneutics” you should pay heed to this quote from the philosopher Hume:

Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.


30

Posted by Raging Bull on Mon, 18 May 2015 01:15 | #

There is no reason why hermeneutics cannot take heed of the passions, if not follow them - if I were being cute, I’d say that following them would be another narrative (say, like the story of “raging bull”), with its own logic of meaning and action, but particularly as we are talking Hume, I’d tend to look at this as an observation to take under consideration at the empirical end, a part of the “circular” process of inquiry.

Its a good comment though, good feedback: that is why you’re missed here.

                         

You must be right that rationalism can be exaggerated. Still, I’d guess that it will be mitigated and subject to some rational consideration by socialization. If proposed as an alternative narrative by which to guide one’s life, the passions would emerge quite speculative and the life would probably be very short and or brutish.

             

But again, I tip my hat to you. Having been a very temperamental person (still am, some times), and not having had recourse to much rational discourse - being surrounded by people who gave free reign to their passions (temper) and wish to be expediently done with annoyances - I used to use my anger (which was intense, often a rage bigger than I was) as maps to show the way to social critique. It did seem to work to uncover some mysteries, but eventually it was used against me by those who know how to manipulate emotionalism - (as Truck Roy explains that sociopaths skillfully do) - especially where I was not in Italy and people could stereotype me, “other” me and vilify me as a “crazy” Italian.
                 
I figured that my father’s FANTASTIC displays of temper - histrionics of rage that honestly made “raging bull” seem fairly rational - were an evolutionary product of the small Italian village. It wasn’t so much a matter of serious competition, though frightening it was - it was more a matter of entertainment and display to break-up the boredom and monotony of a small village. That was apparent in his displays of fantastic rage over quite trivial matters. Where it was confusing and disorienting, which it was quite, everyone around in the village was kindred enough so that someone was likely to have affinity and empathy enough to help pick up the pieces of a shattered mind.

   

The problem with this evolutionary strategy for me was that I was in America, not an Italian village. Therefore, there was not a community of kindred people around who could be bothered to talk, who could understand and help pick up the pieces with me in an efficient way. Taking for granted that level of emotionality may have served in a common population, as Christianity may have served there as well, but not in the antagonistic heterogeneity of The US.

   
“To be born is to be forced to choose to think” - Pascal


“you fucked my brother?” scene from Raging Bull:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhna_J0RZNM

I must say that my father was never physically violent. However, in display of anger, rage and hatred, Raging Bull was mellow, no comparison to my father, in fact.


31

Posted by Is UKIP controlled opposition? on Mon, 18 May 2015 15:38 | #

Jack Sen at London Forum - ‘Is UKIP controlled opposition or genuine Nationalism’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMhCQh6YsOs#t=27


32

Posted by Hess report: Bye bye Nashville on Tue, 19 May 2015 01:11 | #

As opposed to White country music and culture..

“Nashville should be known for welcoming immigrants”

http://www.tennessean.com/story/opinion/contributors/2015/05/17/nashville-welcoming-immigrants/27479183/

The campaign for a new Nashville mayor is in full swing, with public forums being held on a virtually daily basis preceding the August election.

The candidates are often addressing packed houses, touching on a variety of themes, among them diversity in the workplace. Thus far, few have specifically focused on the immigrant and minority demographic.

To address this issue the Tennessee Immigrant and Minority Business Group (TIMBG) is hosting a forum of mayoral candidates at the Global Mall in Antioch on Tuesday. It is appropriate for such an event to be held at the Mall, which is becoming the epicenter of economic and cultural diversity in the Nashville area, rising like a phoenix from the ashes of the former Hickory Hollow Mall.

Nashville was anointed as an “It City” in January 2013 by no less an authority than the New York Times. Yes, the nation has discovered Music City, based on its reputation as a music industry hub. But the city’s image no longer depends on its country music heritage. A growing restaurant scene is enhancing its reputation as a food city as well. And Nashville is also coming into its own as a tech powerhouse.

Oddly enough, missing from the “It City” list is the fact that Nashville is becoming known for its welcoming environment for New Americans. Nashville has gained a reputation as a new “Ellis Island,” a magnet for immigrants from around the world. The number of foreign-born residents in the area has grown from 2 percent to almost 12 percent.

Some 30 percent of students in Metro schools live in homes in which English is not the primary language. In 2012 Nashville had the fastest-growing immigrant population of any American city. It is the home of the nation’s largest Kurdish population, as well as sizable numbers from other countries such as Somalia, Sudan, Egypt, Eretria and Bhutan. Nashville has traditionally had a sizable and prominent African-American community, which accounts for nearly 16 percent of its population.


33

Posted by melpeexxx on Tue, 19 May 2015 12:05 | #

Jews (Ashkenazim) are only interested in personal satisfaction and are not concerned with goyim demographics. We are a super intelligent and shrewd cult who likes to keep things the way they are. A winning team does not wish to change the rules.
Jews (Ashkenazim) are only interested in personal satisfaction and are not concerned with goyim demographics. We are a super intelligent and shrewd cult who likes to keep things the way they are. A winning team does not wish to change the rules.


34

Posted by a la la la la la la la la la on Tue, 19 May 2015 17:32 | #

you said that twice, said that twice, that you don’t want to change the rules, said that twice, said that twice…


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgNfTx9pGzA


35

Posted by Jewish manichean trickery, rule changes on Wed, 20 May 2015 02:24 | #

“Jews (Ashkenazim) are only interested in personal satisfaction and are not concerned with goyim demographics. We are a super intelligent and shrewd cult who likes to keep things the way they are. A winning team does not wish to change the rules.”

Jews may not change their rules where it suits them, but they change ours, often reversing the meaning:

From “civil rights” and “leftism” the list is long of such Jewish corruptions, perversion really, of terms and conceptual tools.

Their Manichean trickery applies to us, not to themselves; for themselves they are Augustinian.

 


36

Posted by eath-wish for the benefit of common good on Thu, 21 May 2015 16:13 | #

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/05/what-to-read-part-3-hero-and-heretic-vs-the-system-from-literature-to-politics/#more-27954

The nouns ‘hero’ and ‘heretic’ are used as frequent figures of speech in daily communication. Every day, almost every minute of our time, either consciously or subconsciously, we refer to the notion of hero and heretic, albeit by using often different words and expressions. The highly generic nouns ‘hero’ and ‘heretic’ lack a precise common denominator. What may be considered a heretical behavior today may be viewed as heroic behavior tomorrow. The meaning of the noun ‘hero’ is further complicated by its semantic shifts and its awkward equivalents in other languages and cultures. Thus the German word for hero is ‘Held’, although this word conveys a wider meaning in Germanic languages than the English word ‘hero’ or the French ‘héros’, deriving from the ancient Greek, and largely associated with political and military prowess only.

One must also refer to some well-known authors who dealt with the study of heros, such as Joseph Campbell and his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces, a book still serving as a primer in religious science courses at universities in the USA, but also a book which influenced many Hollywood moguls.  Although Campbell never addressed the notion of the hero from a racial perspective, the fact that he sat on the editorial board of the Mankind Quarterly and that he had once upon a distant time allegedly cracked a small joke in front of his colleagues about the Jews earned him the title of “anti-Semite,” , a label not usually associated with heroism.

The nouns ‘hero’ and ‘heretic’ are used as frequent figures of speech in daily communication. Every day, almost every minute of our time, either consciously or subconsciously, we refer to the notion of hero and heretic, albeit by using often different words and expressions. The highly generic nouns ‘hero’ and ‘heretic’ lack a precise common denominator. What may be considered a heretical behavior today may be viewed as heroic behavior tomorrow. The meaning of the noun ‘hero’ is further complicated by its semantic shifts and its awkward equivalents in other languages and cultures. Thus the German word for hero is ‘Held’, although this word conveys a wider meaning in Germanic languages than the English word ‘hero’ or the French ‘héros’, deriving from the ancient Greek, and largely associated with political and military prowess only.

One must also refer to some well-known authors who dealt with the study of heros, such as Joseph Campbell and his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces, a book still serving as a primer in religious science courses at universities in the USA, but also a book which influenced many Hollywood moguls.  Although Campbell never addressed the notion of the hero from a racial perspective, the fact that he sat on the editorial board of the Mankind Quarterly and that he had once upon a distant time allegedly cracked a small joke in front of his colleagues about the Jews earned him the title of “anti-Semite,” , a label not usually associated with heroism.


The same heroic and individualistic pattern of death-wish for the benefit of common good can be observed in Homer’s death challenger, the Greek hero Achilles who besieges the town of Troy and in the equally well death-driven hero Hector who defends his home town Troy.

    Hector:  “For me it would be a great deal better to meet Achilles man to man, kill him, and go home, or get killed before the city, dying in glory.” (Iliad, Book XXII, lines 108-110).

The future founder of Rome, Vergil’s mythical Aeneas during his interminable trials in the underworld, acted in a similar communal and death-braving fashion. So did his other mythical counterpart, the seafaring Homer’s Odysseus, always enwrapped in solitary musings, always having his life hovering on the brink of death.

  “His eyes were perpetually wet with tears now / His life draining away in homesickness.” (Odysseus, Book V, lines 156–158)

Thousands of similar heroic characters have become household names all over the West. Those mythical heroes stood as symbols for the survival of their tribal, racial or political community, yet strangely enough, all of them always attempted to stay above the fray, always shunning gregarious, communal and folkish behavior of their noisy kinsmen.

 

 

 

 

 


37

Posted by unpc downunder on Sat, 23 May 2015 22:45 | #

With Jewish over-representation in the US reaching Weimar levels in some instances, a sensible affirmative action principle is “other things being equal, Gentiles should get hiring preference over Jews.”

This way Jews can only be selected if they are the best candidate for the job. Over time this principle would cut Jewish representation by at least 40 percent.

This affirmative action principle should also be applied in favour in men over women, particularly in culturally important fields where women (particularly upper middle class women) are increasingly over-represented (teaching, media, PR, government administration etc).

The other good things about this form of affirmative action, is that it doesn’t have to lower standards, it just shifts selection of similarly qualified candidates in favor of whites and white family formation.


38

Posted by DanielS on Sun, 24 May 2015 06:16 | #

We need a more radical separatism from Jews than that, unpc downunder.

However, for a politician to talk in those terms could be good tact as it is an evidently innocent way of calling attention to just who the powers-that-be are, the injustice of it, and to provide assurance to our people that we are fair mined. This can then lead to demonstrations that while we could be fair, the Jews never will be. Therefore, we need them to be separate from our system altogether, not just disingenuously agreeing to some correction of their over representation, while they tuck their influence and money in some other place. .


39

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:32 | #

Well, I think that aside from that issue of his choice of words, even if you think it’s crucial that he makes the distinction between white hippies and Jewish Marxists of the 1960s, I would say that having read through the whole article, it seems to me that Kevin MacDonald has done a pretty good job at identifying just how ridiculous PJ O’Rourke is.

O’Rourke is essentially kissing the backsides of the Jews with amazing fervency, and MacDonald is showing the exact mechanism through which that kissing is occurring.


40

Posted by recent KM on Jewish influence on migration & war on Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:36 | #

David Duke interviews Kevin MacDonald, who talks about Jewish influence on war and migration throughout the world.


41

Posted by Julie Fowlis on Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:51 | #

Julie Fowlis - ‘Hùg air a Bhonnaid Mhor’



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Picking up the British electoral pieces
Previous entry: Misguided Truck: “A"moralizing at Stormtrooper Radio

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

F. Petry commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:22. (View)

Sudanese migrant opens fire in church commented in entry 'black hyper-assertiveness' on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 08:12. (View)

Til Victory Be Won commented in entry 'True Briton & Oswald Mosley's Union Movement' on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 05:48. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 04:21. (View)

Julie Lake commented in entry 'An initial stream of exposure of Giacomo Vallone & The European Knights Project points to Jack Sen' on Sun, 24 Sep 2017 18:29. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Sun, 24 Sep 2017 11:33. (View)

He makes our sending rockets to all US inevitable commented in entry 'North Korea fires missile over Japan in 'unprecedented threat'' on Sun, 24 Sep 2017 02:20. (View)

Media Silence on SA White Genocide commented in entry 'A genocide in South Africa' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:09. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'America's Jews Are Driving America's Wars: We don't need their war with Iran' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 14:15. (View)

TradYouth is of course doing this too commented in entry 'Richard Spencer & AltRight's Imperialist, Supremacist Aims Run Roughshod to Bad Default Lines of War' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:22. (View)

Nina Rosenwald, benefactor of AfD commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:06. (View)

Greg Johnson re: antifa spy Patrik Hermansson commented in entry 'Anti-fascist activist goes undercover with 'alt right' to expose movement's rapid European expansion' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 06:30. (View)

Jewish communities say Russia free of antiSemitism commented in entry 'Richard Spencer & AltRight's Imperialist, Supremacist Aims Run Roughshod to Bad Default Lines of War' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 05:58. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 04:57. (View)

KSCO's Georgia Peach discusses White genocide commented in entry 'O’Mei Chinese Restaurant Closure – Anatomy of Political Suppression' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 02:39. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 00:48. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Sat, 23 Sep 2017 00:16. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:17. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:09. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:45. (View)

Maria lashes Turks and Caicos commented in entry 'Hurricane Irmina Gathering - Worst Case Scenario is Worse than Harvey, Worse than Katrina [updates]' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:56. (View)

Christian Zionism: The Tragedy & The Turning commented in entry 'Donald Trump gives Benjamin Netanyahu everything he wants.' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:01. (View)

Half empty stadium for Rams/ 49ers commented in entry 'Seduction of NFL Films, Appeal of L.A. Rams 60's, 70's, dodging legacy of sports-fan cuckoldry' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:50. (View)

AltRight Politics: Imperialism commented in entry 'Russia's Geography Problem' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:05. (View)

The enemy is already within the gates commented in entry ''White privilege' as a warrant for expropriation; Christianity as the executing jurisdiction.' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:03. (View)

Conclusion Jorjani statement on Altright.com commented in entry 'Acrimony on the Alt-Right: Predictably, the Inherent Instability of The Right Emerges' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:09. (View)

Jason Jorjani: Why I left Altright.com Inc. commented in entry 'Acrimony on the Alt-Right: Predictably, the Inherent Instability of The Right Emerges' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:07. (View)

Vietnam war documentary by Ken Burns commented in entry 'Fuck You Right Wing. Fuck You Alternative Right. The White Class Will Prevail and is Here to Stay.' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 19:48. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:58. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:14. (View)

The Hackers tried to destroy Red Ice commented in entry 'Red Ice Radio interviews Majorityrights roundtable about Brexit.' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:33. (View)

European Girl marries into Isil commented in entry 'German girls being conditioned to be mothers with black baby simulator dolls' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 04:56. (View)

The Viennna School of Logical Positivism commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 04:21. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 02:34. (View)

affection-tone