|
|
|
No Global Age, only globalised greed The blog has experienced a serious technical problem over the last few days, which prevented new postings. Thankfully, James resolved it, and I’ve been pitched back into the world of political news and thought. And what I have been trying to get a handle on has been that brief and very strange, conflicted marriage of radical leftist idealism, political establishments generally, American national interest and corporate greed which is, or was, the movement for globalisation. I was thrust into this line of country by a news snippet two days ago about the resignation of Brazil’s political heroine and Environment Minister, Marina Silva.
What really did for her was the strongly rising cost of commodities on world markets. Money, in other words ... and weak politicians. These include the one-time champion of workers rights and two-times elected president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. But this is the sad, too too predictable story of globalisation everywhere. Now, let’s rewind eighteen years and see how it came to this. It means going back to the aftermath of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Anyone past his twenties will likely remember watching the whole process of revolution in the east unfold. It was an extraordinary and breathless passage of time, the like of which we simply did not believe we would witness in our lifetimes. Those involved, of course, knew that communism as ideology was an empty shell. Homo sovieticus had nothing to field against the national soul of the western satellites. But what was not known was how weak the state structure itself was. But, also, what I never dreamt as I watched the images on the television screen was how little the hard-left in the West, which had supported the workers’ paradise throughout, was inclined to walk into history with Homo sovieticus. Instead, it stampeded into new political causes. Certainly, as a long-time observer of the English political scene I knew that there were Trots - a fair number of them violent - in the left’s woodwork, plus a few Moscow hard-liners typically in Scottish trade unionism and many a devotee of Bennite socialism across the board. These “elements” were already marginalised by the process of modernisation in the Labour Party. They seemed perfectly doomed to me. I never anticipated that the most unbalanced and violent elements would simply morph into animal rights activists. And I certainly didn’t foresee, by the time of the Davos World Economic Forum in 1999, the emergence of a riotous hardcore of “anti-globalisation activists” (meaning anti-global capitalism activists). Of course, one could see in the protesters at Davos and then at Seattle the face of anti-capitalism. But this was still something new, a well-rehearsed and directed, revolutionary street theatre in chic surroundings. The objective was not to protest for its own sake, like the self-indulgent protests of old. These people were out to expose the oppressive mechanisms which underpinned corporate rapacity in the Third World, and to embarrass that portion of the Establishment left which, like Sn Lula, acquiesced in it. They went about it intelligently. But, just as before, the hard edge of leftist radicalism was the small minority. The vast majority of thinking folk in the mainstream left were no less quick to identify global justice as the new black, but sashayed down the political catwalk after their undisputed leader, Bill Clinton. Now, had I paid sufficient attention to the reinventive capacities of Malcolm Bradbury’s anti-hero in his 1975 campus novel, The History Man, I would have known about this. The millenial History Men of the 1990s wasted no time in learning that “globality” was the successor to centrality, and that the advocacy of environmental standards and workers’ basic rights in the Third World stood for the international solidarity of the old left. Globalisation, then, gave the post-Soviet left in the West the chance to believe again in the inevitability of human progress, and also, as the main driver of progress, in the West’s moral duty to the rest of Mankind. While separate from the much more established effort to negate nationalism in the European mind (by the destruction of the very concept of the nation itself through unlimited population transfer), it nevertheless dovetailed with it. Open-borders, multiculturalism, institutionalised anti-racism and affirmative action were reverse methodologies of bringing the post-nation into the global. At home and abroad, then, the left had reasons to embrace the oppressed if they had a brown or black-skin ... if they were victims of wars fought with Western weapons ... if they were victims of “exclusion” or “racism”, etc ... if they were the wage slaves of Western capitalism. It must have been leftist heaven for a time. But it couldn’t last. As an effort to give moral leadership to the immoral interests of global corporations it was able to survive only so long as Clinton could find a way to express American interests through all the universalist rubric. But, increasingly, those interests could not be disguised, nor separated from the interests of money and naked power (which had its own agenda, its own institutions, its own meeting places and a much more established role in the game of world politics). Once George Bush planted his simian toe on the White House doormat the global narrative was swept away. We had the “clash of civilizations” and the “War on Terror” instead. Today, the core issues beloved by the left - the moralistic, anti-Western environmentalism and the demand for global justice - are off the agenda in any meaningful sense. We had the UN Statement of its Millenial Goals. We had Blair’s 2003 Commission for Africa. Plus ça change. Pro-Western, pro-EU neoliberal governments are everywhere in eastern Europe. The most recent victors, Yushchenko in Ukraine and Tusk in Poland, will now be joined by a surprised Boris Tadic in Serbia. David Cameron seems all but certain to defeat Brown in 2010. The left in Britain, anyway, cannot find a role for itself, nationally or internationally. In America, the War on Terror will dominate the next presidential term, whoever wins in November. Meanwhile, the deathless idealists and contrarians are busy morphing out of another failed project. The global-left and the anti-globalization left have been toying with alternative globalisation, and are on their way to the alter-global movement. They talk about global civil society, and they seek influence through regular social forums attended by thousands of like-minded intellectuals and activists. In 2004 one of them, Geoffrey Pleyers, described the spirit of these events as celebrating diversity and embracing movement rather than organization. And that, surely, looks like the end of the effort to achieve the Global Age by direct involvement in government. There persists one mighty gain for these people’s programme that has not been in any way been reversed (except, maybe, in some very small way in Italy). The nations of the West are still on course for ethno-suicide. A little victory in the battle that, if we are to survive, must have thousands of such victories, may be that those two words used by Pleyers - celebrating diversity - are just too filled with pathos now to be serviceable. In memorium, then, I offer this trip down memory lane:-
Thanks for reading all this. It’s nice to be back. Comments:2
Posted by Robert Reis on Sat, 17 May 2008 05:36 | # “Facts are the things that don’t go away when you stop believing in them.” 3
Posted by Robert Reis on Sat, 17 May 2008 05:46 | # Netherlands Justice Minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin has attracted sharp criticism from a large part of the Lower House following the surprise arrest of cartoonist Gregorius Nekschot. He is facing charges of discrimination. The arrest took place last Tuesday. The well-known stand-up comedian Hans Teeuwen, a friend of Nekschot, said on TV programme Pauw en Witteman that around 10 police dragged the cartoonist out of his home in Amsterdam in a brutal manner. His computer and telephone were seized, according to a furious Teeuwen. The Public Prosecutor’s Office (OM) in Amsterdam confirmed that Nekschot (‘Neck Shot’) was arrested for the publication of cartoons that are discriminatory against Muslims and people of darker skin. The cartoonist was held for about a day and a half and interrogated twice. The OM still has to decide whether he will actually be prosecuted. The arrest is particularly remarkable because it follows a complaint dating from 2005. Three years later, there was suddenly reason to take Nekschot by surprise in his home, said Teeuwen with incomprehension. Hirsch Ballin said Friday the arrest was only now carried out because Nekschot’s identity was not known to the OM before. According to Geenstijl.nl website, this is nonsense because internet providers must provide the details of operators of websites they host if the OM asks for this as part of a criminal investigation. The OM did not bother to make such a request before, but Hirsch Ballin apparently now wants headlines such as ‘Cartoonist Arrested in The Netherlands’ to be send into the world to improve tense relations with Arab countries, Geenstijl suggested. Centre-left D66 MP Boris van der Ham has requested Justice Minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin for clarification. The arrest raises “many questions about freedom of speech,” according to Van der Ham. Socialist Party (SP) MP Jan de Wit also finds it very strange that the cartoonist was “arrested in his bed for a cartoon from 2005.” Freedom of expression “means that people must be able to draw and say whatever they want.” The conservatives (VVD) were also very critical. The government parties did not want to use hard words. Labour (PvdA) MP Ton Heerts did say that “prosecuting a cartoonist is going pretty far.” But the Christian democrats (CDA) and ChristenUnie said the OM probably has good reasons for its way of operating. Cartoonists, comics and columnists have more freedom of expression than other citizens, according to jurisprudence. This is due to the form - artistic or satirical - they choose for their argument. Party for Freedom (PVV) leader Geert Wilders is accusing the OM in Amsterdam, which gave the police the order for the arrest, of “dictatorial tendencies.” Wilders said Friday he cannot remember a cartoonist ever being arrested anywhere in the West. He wants to call Hirsch Ballin to account Tuesday during the weekly question hour in the Lower House. The arrest followed an investigation of the work of Nekschot, after a complaint was made against him in 2005 by Abdul Jabbar van de Ven. This Dutch convert to Islam calls himself an Imam. After the murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh, he said on TV he would thank Allah if he could arrange for Geert Wilders to die, “for example of cancer”. Jabbar van de Ven made the complaint to the National Discrimination Expertise Centre (LECD). This complaint was passed on to the OM. According to Geenstijl.nl, Paul Velleman, the prosecutor who gave the order for the cartoonist’s arrest, is also the head of the LECD. Gregorius Nekschot publishes mainly on the Internet, but also produced a book titled ‘Nekschot: Sick jokes.’ Theo van Gogh, assassinated by a Muslim terrorist in 2004, gave space on his website to the work of Nekschot. According to Teeuwen, the cartoonist was intimidated by one of the officers during his arrest, who apparently said that his real surname would be made public. “A pretty intimidating remark.” Precisely because of the threat of radical Muslims, Nekschot is very cautious about who he gives his real name to, said Teeuwen. Prosecutor Paul Velleman is also leading the OM team that is investigating whether Wilders should be prosecuted for discrimination, according to Geenstijl.nl. In 2005, Velleman decided that the radical E Tawheed mosque in Amsterdam could not be prosecuted for selling books in which calls were made for throwing homosexuals from apartment buildings head-first. 4
Posted by EA Steve on Sat, 17 May 2008 06:05 | # In response to the article posted by Robert Reis: If this is not a Declaration of War, against the Dutch people, then I don’t know what is and/or would be. Dutch “anti-racism” has evidenced itself to be the enemy. The “anti-racists” are out to exterminate us and our racial cousins, across the [Atlantic] Ocean. This even applies to religion. I don’t want to see Islam conquer Europe, even when disregarding race. We must unite to preserve our race and religion! 5
Posted by Bill on Sat, 17 May 2008 09:52 | # Thanks for that GW.
Our way of living, which has been facilitated by the abundance of cheap energy, is rapidly coming to a close, forcing mankind into an evolutionary convulsion, its collapse will be swifter than its emergence. It would appear, that to the thinkers, movers and shakers, the white race has gotta go, as they are perceived as the roadblock to the progress of humankind. The oncoming evolutionary convulsion will of course pay no heed to the thinkers, for this is where Darwinism (reality) comes into its own, anyway, they haven’t consulted the whites yet, for I’m sure they will have something to say on the subject. 6
Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 17 May 2008 10:34 | # I did not know that, Robert. Thanks. But who is discriminating against whom?
7
Posted by Gordon of Khartoum on Sat, 17 May 2008 14:07 | # Quote: “Certainly, as a long-time observer of the English political scene I knew that there were Trots - a fair number of them violent - in the left’s woodwork, plus a few Moscow hard-liners typically in Scottish trade unionism and many a devotee of Bennite socialism across the board. These “elements” were already marginalised by the process of modernisation in the Labour Party. They seemed perfectly doomed to me. I never anticipated that the most unbalanced and violent elements would simply morph into animal rights activists. And I certainly didn’t foresee, by the time of the Davos World Economic Forum in 1999, the emergence of a riotous hardcore of “anti-globalisation activists” (meaning anti-global capitalism activists).” “
8
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 17 May 2008 15:14 | # Snouck blogs on the Gregorius Nekschot arrest (see Robert Reis’ and GW’s comments):
I have to say that photo of Hirsch Ballin (see the link in Guessedworker’s comment) rivals Red Ken’s for making my blood run cold. Take a look at the face on that guy. Terrifying! Oh, and about his conversion from Judaïsm to Catholicism? He can convert back now, he’s not fooling anyone: his cover’s blown, as they say. (Same goes for the Aftonbladet’s columnist and former editor Helle Klein up in Sweden.) And how about this Paul Velleman character? Who the hell is this son of a bitch and what in the goddamn hell is his problem? He acts like the Dutch government’s very own official version of Canada’s Richard “The Incredible Asshole” Warmann. 9
Posted by Nux Gnomica on Sat, 17 May 2008 15:43 | # Add Liz Windsor to the diversitoids:
If diversity were “indeed a strength”, people wouldn’t need to be told it was so often. See Jared Taylor for a definitive refutation: The Myth of Diversity: Seldom have so many pretended to believe something so absurd 10
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 17 May 2008 15:43 | # The Queen joins the Pope in officially advocating the overthrow of Christianity by Islam and Europe’s total race-replacement. 11
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 17 May 2008 16:04 | # Make that “joins the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury in officially advocating the overthrow of Christianity by Islam [etc.]” At least the complete nincompoop Rowan Williams has the excuse he was hand-picked by obedient globalist toady, Tony Blair, so had no business being Archbishop of Canterbury in the first place. What’s the Queen’s excuse? And what’s Prince Phillip’s for not being able to control her? (Or, perhaps, for [... gag ...] agreeing with her???) As for the Pope, the mind simply boggles at the depths of his ineptness and evildoing. 12
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 17 May 2008 16:20 | # I posted this Brenda Walker Vdare.com link already in another thread but if I may, I’ll post it again here since it’s highly relevant to the topic of globalism and shows clearly, in one quick read for any doubters (though you do have to read between the lines a bit), how globalism (and the open borders and government-enforced race-replacement that go along with it) is not happening by itself but is carefully planned and meticulously implemented by the Eurosphere’s ruling élites. In my view it’s been in the active planning stages since WW II’s end and in the active implementation stages since the mid-1970s — and of course has been galloping since the mid-1980s, and especially since communism’s downfall in 1989 freed up all the communists to cross over and join the E.U. posing as democrats without shedding a single one of their West-destroying, race-and-nation-obliterating, one-socialist-world, Homo sovieticus communist objectives. 13
Posted by Matra on Sat, 17 May 2008 16:29 | # The most recent victors, Yushchenko in Ukraine and Tusk in Poland, will now be joined by a surprised Boris Tadic in Serbia. Not so fast. The giddy response to the Serbian election from the globalists may have been premature.
Notice how in almost every report about the Serbian elections the media use the term ‘anti-Western’ to describe the very moderate Serbian nationalists. Sovereignty is now ‘anti-Western’. The ironically named Radio Free Europe (an American propaganda outlet) used the term ‘Nationalist-Socialist’ to describe the potential coalition in Serbia. Hmm…what does that remind you of? 14
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 17 May 2008 17:43 | # Oops! I guess the Jews have their work cut out for them getting Southern Italians to swallow their multiculti bullshit:
Hey how come Israel doesn’t have a gypsy problem? Aren’t the Jews the ones who want the borders open (everyone’s but theirs) and everyone to mix with everyone (everyone but them)? What’s up with that? Who’s depriving the Jews and Israel of the benefits, advantages, and sheer joys of multiculturalism the Jews never stop telling eveyone about? Whoever it is I want it stopped and several hundred thousand gypsies let into Israel immediately. It’s grossly unfair to the Jews to keep them from enjoying all those benefits! It’s downright criminal! (Hat tip.) 15
Posted by Robert Reis on Sat, 17 May 2008 20:42 | # 17 May 2008 ...The Pacific Research Institute estimates that the tort system nationwide costs the economy about $7,000 for every family in America. The pols in Washington are sending out tax-rebate checks of up to $1,200 for married couples in hopes of stimulating the economy. But outside of Mississippi and a few other places, there seems to be little understanding of how frivolous lawsuits and greedy tort lawyers weigh down the economy….Thanks to Mr. Barbour, the state’s unemployment rate is down to about 6% from nearly 9%. Last year, Mississippi’s per capita income growth was 6.7%, third highest of the 50 states and well above the national average of 5.2%. Mississippi tort reform is making the poor richer, and the rich lawyers less fabulously rich. __WSJ__via__LibLeanings At this time, the two officially approved feedstocks for the Oynklent Green thermochemical bio-energy process are corrupt politicians and trial lawyers. Oynklent officials continue their vigilence in the search for viable bio-energy feedstock that will not drive the price of food higher. It certainly appears that they have chosen well, and that quality of life for everyone should begin to go up as soon as OG goes into full production mode. 16
Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 17 May 2008 23:25 | # Jeremy Seabrook, a leftist intellectual and internationalist of the old school, has an interesting and extremely forcefully written article on New Labour at the Guardian. His take on globalisation is somewhat different to mine. He writes:-
“Ordinary” has joined the thread, but too late to engage with the debate, I suspect. 17
Posted by Bill on Sun, 18 May 2008 08:28 | # Guardian CIF The politics of impotence. goldwing3 Broadly speaking the convergence of British mainstream political parties is the result of Labour adopting Conservative economic policies and the Conservatives adopting Labour’s (culturally Marxist) social policies In a nutshell? 18
Posted by Bert Rustle on Sun, 18 May 2008 10:45 | # Lee Barnes has an article http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/05/harvard-university-and-globalisation.html 19
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 18 May 2008 13:00 | # Thanks, Bert. Not bad at all from Mr Barnes, notwithstanding the occasional lapses into the Disgusting Habits of Capital Letters. I am totally unconvinced about eco-nationalism. It seems to me that energy outages and the rest will likely be accepted, as they were in the eastern European satellites. Further, a people sozzled with “entertainment” won’t rise up against their complacent masters. They will plead fot them to solve all the problems:-
20
Posted by Nux Gnomica on Sun, 18 May 2008 14:44 | # You’re a glutton for punishment, GW. Seabrook is barely a mediocre writer, and even then only by comparison with other lefties.
How can it be both adrift and stranded? Logic fetters the will, which is why lefty prose prefers to ignore it. 21
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 18 May 2008 15:33 | # Nux, The CiF comment rules state:-
I’ve reached the conclusion that my posts are often deleted because they are a little too blunt about the journalist’s initial offering, especially when said journalist is a foreigner and is nakedly ethnic-mongering. So now it’s my policy not to get deleted, and not to get banned. “Ordinary” has only been kicked once today (by “tooter”), which is a record I think. 22
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 18 May 2008 18:21 | # David Rockefeller is, of course, one of the biggest globalist criminals the world has ever seen. (He’s 92 and, unfortunately for the world, still active.)
23
Posted by Nux Gnomica on Sun, 18 May 2008 18:54 | #
Yes, you need to *think*. It’s Noam Chomsky’s prime directive, I believe. As a troglodyte, you’ll not find it easy, but you’ll know you’ve succeeded when you agree with tooter. Interesting fact in this review of Levy’s autobiography:
So Smith wasn’t such a Friend of Israel. Lucky he died prematurely, then, from the Chosenites’ POV. I suppose he was Gaitskell to Blair’s Harold Wilson.
24
Posted by Jethro Jebus Lord Garth on Sun, 18 May 2008 20:52 | # Say Scrooby, have you discussed these issues with your local turd-burglar of “God”? I’m wondering since you’ve admitted to be a Roman Cornholer, yet you spend all your time on message boards rather than confronting the sissies of “God” directly. 25
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 18 May 2008 21:13 | # To Jethro (if I understood his comment right, admittely a big “if”): The Catholics are free to come read my comments anywhere I post them. 26
Posted by Jethro Jebus Lord Garth on Sun, 18 May 2008 22:29 | # That’s not it Scrooby. You sass the RC behind it’s back on the internet but won’t confront it directly because of personal weakness. You remind me of those losers okiereddust and Walter Yannis over at OriginalDissent.com. 27
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 18 May 2008 22:36 | # Confront it directly? Can you speak to the Pope’s agent about getting me a personal audience? E-mail me care of the blog. 28
Posted by 357 on Mon, 19 May 2008 00:36 | # “Marina Silva has blamed the increasing deforestation of the Amazon on Brazilian cattle ranchers and farmers. “Brazil is losing the only voice in the government that spoke out for the environment, ...” This is just another event that is leading us right into a Malthusian catastrophe. If the third world population explosion isn’t reversed, I’m afraid we’re ALL doomed to a life of untold misery. DOOMED!!! 29
Posted by 357 on Mon, 19 May 2008 15:50 | # “The Prince of Wales has warned that the world faces a series of natural disasters within 18 months unless urgent action is taken to save the rainforests. [ ... ] In one of his most out-spoken interventions in the climate change debate, he said a £15 billion annual programme was required to halt deforestation or the world would have to live with the dire consequences…..” Is Prince Charles just another kooky guy that is using environmentalist propaganda to promote the globalists’ agenda, or is he warning us about something that is real .... or both? 31
Posted by Bill on Mon, 19 May 2008 23:03 | # Challenge for leader blog. 19.05.2008. Anonymous posted .....
Seems I am not alone - I’ve thought this from the very beginning. - Bill. 32
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 21 May 2008 02:06 | # I worship this woman and the government that appointed her. Notice again, it’s among the Southern Europeans more than among the Northern that are most easily found men, women, and governments whose loyalty to truth and whose devotion to mental and societal health, normalness, and happiness permit them neither to agree with, nor to cower before, the twisted, the politically correct, the degenerate, be it on the part of the communist, the leftist, the homosexual, or the Jewish aggressor. Look at her Italian face: no degenerate on earth can scare her into submission: she has too much intelligence, too many hormones, too much strength, too much sheer womanliness. She has too much love. To release these genes you must need heat or something — they never seem to get activated in northern Europe where the women are all women’s libbers and the Nords just can’t seem to race-replace themselves fast enough, while the Neapolitans in the South are out there defending themselves unapologetically with Molotov cocktails lobbed into baby-thieving gypsy camps. Hey I’m against violence but still ... when the hell are we going to see some self-defense behavior among the PC-submissive Jew-fearing homosexual-dominated Northern race-replaced slaves? Was there ever a Northern-Euro woman in politics who expressed herself the way this feminine-souled iron-willed crystal-clear-headed Italian goddess has? Ever in the past hundred years? 33
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 21 May 2008 05:05 | #
34
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 21 May 2008 05:17 | # And check this out. Looks like Italy bids fair to lead us all out of this goddamn mess we’re in! These Italians are unafraid, they don’t give a good god damn about bullshit, threats, or PC intimidation, they are determined, they know what they don’t want, and they will not quit. They may end up showing the lost, confused, and cowed Nords the way! 35
Posted by me on Wed, 21 May 2008 06:57 | # LOL scrooby…but what does that say about America? Not to name names…HILLARY…CONDI… 36
Posted by me on Wed, 21 May 2008 06:59 | # btw scrooby you will be dissapointed to know that I lived in Italy for a while and the Italians are freindly and normal, and not race obsessed facists. 37
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 21 May 2008 12:03 | # Notice that both of “me’s” comments just above were examples of several logical fallacies, chiefly ignoratio elenchi but non sequitur was in there, as well as others. Subcons are usually smarter than that, “me.” You need to work on your English reading comprehension a little. How’s your Sanskrit? 38
Posted by Varun on Fri, 23 May 2008 10:02 | # “obama is the only halfway handsome one ” Obama even remotley handsome? Are you crazy 39
Posted by 357 on Fri, 23 May 2008 14:25 | # “in fact obama is the only halfway handsome one in the lot, even taking age into account…” Obama looks like your typical gangling black teenager ... with Alfred E Newman ears. heh heh heh 40
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 23 May 2008 21:16 | # Teddy Kennedy may deliberately try to play on public and Congressional sympathy, elicited by his terminal illness, to drum up “pity voting” in a last-ditch attempt, by this extraordinarily hate-filled Irishman (and career-long enthusiastic agent of Euro-loathing Jewy) to really stick it to the WASPs by completing the destruction of the nation-state they created through legalizing the forty-five-million-strong mass of non-white Third-World mystery meat that’s managed to claw its way in from corners of the Earth no man has even heard of let along knows aught about. Without doubt that’s what’s soon to be in the offing, either that or, after he succumbs to his illness, the Dem Party will mawkishly call for pity-voting “as a fitting final memorial to the deceased’s dying wish to achieve, at long last, this humane step on behalf of all long-suffering Third-World poor who want only to come to this the greastest country in the world and contribute to it.” http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/05/23/the-ted-kennedy-memorial-immigration-act/ 41
Posted by 357 on Fri, 23 May 2008 21:53 | # Re: the latest effort to grant illegals amnesty stripped from the Iraq Spending Bill.
Could show by “a preponderance of the evidence” that he worked 863 hours or 150 work days (defined as 5.75 hours of work per “work day”), or earned at least $7,000 in agricultural employment between January1, 2004, and December 31, 2007;
Was not a known terrorist or convicted criminal; and Paid a “fine” of $250. 42
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 23 May 2008 22:11 | # I didn’t know, incidentally, that in order to help get it passed Teddy and Bobby Kennedy had hawked the 1965 “It’s Good for Irishmen Who Want to Stick it to WASPs, and Great, Really Fantastic, for Euro-Loathing Jews” Guaranteed White-Race Annihilation Immigration Bill as a fitting memorial to their assassinated brother whose dying wish, or so they claimed, was to open the U.S.‘s borders to the Jewish version of Zyklon-B: unlimited non-white Third World immigration. I didn’t know these two had done that before reading Marcus Epstein’s Vdare.com piece linked in my last comment. 43
Posted by 357 on Fri, 23 May 2008 22:42 | # Marcus Epstien is a Jew. His article over at Vdare.com is an obvious attempt to deflect attention from the real perpetrators of the 1965 Immigration Act onto the Kennedys. I for one ain’t fallin’ for his misleading BS. We should be so lucky as to have it that the most powerful force pushing for amnesty for illegal aleins is Ted Kennedy. But no, he serves as only a spokesman for the real forces that are pushing for massive immigration into the USA. 44
Posted by Bill on Fri, 23 May 2008 23:44 | # Oh! Mr Porter….? Crewe - Nantwich - Newsnight. Having just finished viewing BBC Newsnight with Gavin Esler and his guest panel of Lib/Lab/Con luvvies dissecting the Crewe and Nantwich by election results - things are quite clear. The consensus are incapable of thinking outside the liberal bubble, they just don’t get it. Their wringing hands simply couldn’t understand (get it) that people were fleeing in their millions from their escapist liberal dream-world, and in accordance with true illogical liberal thinking, the good people of Crewe and Nantwich were not rejecting liberalism (never even hinted at) but were rejecting one Gordon Brown - you couldn’t believe it. Yes, Gordo is the boogie-man, it must be down to him, he simply isn’t Tony. So when the good people of Britain come eyeball to eyeball with Tony Cameron they will be beside themselves with incomprehension, and will become dazed with disorientation - what then? Political meltdown in Britain, that’s what when - all bets are off. 45
Posted by EA Steve on Sat, 24 May 2008 06:14 | # I forgot the source, but I read somewhere, that Ted Kennedy explained “why” he hated his race. In the article, Ted claimed that he saw “Irish Need Not Apply” signs. For all it said, it could have been discrimination from non-Catholics, or even a non-White. But that is irrelevant; he noticed discrimination, if he was telling the truth. According to his story, he claimed that he didn’t want to discriminate and/or allow discrimination, because of his alleged suffering. (I think he supports massive non-White immigration, truly because of the American Establishment and lobbyists, but that is a different matter.) Ending discrimination (at jobs) doesn’t mean you have to open the borders, so Ted is mentally “insane” or lying! However, even if he is lying, I think it provides a useful point. Many Jews probably fear the same sort of discrimination. To be honest, if I were Jewish (and openly so), I would be almost paranoid. The Holocaust is still fresh in their minds, and anti-Semitism is likely to skyrocket. It’s important Jews and White Gentiles look at each others’ perspectives, as this could help bring some sort of White Nationalism in some of the Jewish mainstream. We must compete with the far-left “egalitarians” for Jewish converts. The same thing applied to Irish Catholics. Note: I am not necessarily arguing against past arguments opposed to White Gentile-Jewish integration. I am merely providing another way to look at the Jewish Question. 46
Posted by EA Steve on Sat, 24 May 2008 06:22 | # Teddy Kennedy may deliberately try to play on public and Congressional sympathy, elicited by his terminal illness, to drum up “pity voting” in a last-ditch attempt, by this extraordinarily hate-filled Irishman (and career-long enthusiastic agent of Euro-loathing Jewy) to really stick it to the WASPs by completing the destruction of the nation-state they created through legalizing the forty-five-million-strong mass of non-white Third-World mystery meat that’s managed to claw its way in from corners of the Earth no man has even heard of let along knows aught about. Without doubt that’s what’s soon to be in the offing, either that or, after he succumbs to his illness, the Dem Party will mawkishly call for pity-voting “as a fitting final memorial to the deceased’s dying wish to achieve, at long last, this humane step on behalf of all long-suffering Third-World poor who want only to come to this the greastest country in the world and contribute to it.” http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/05/23/the-ted-kennedy-memorial-immigration-act/ Posted by Fred Scrooby on Friday, May 23, 2008 at 08:16 PM | # I will be very angry, if this happens! We must keep the pressure on Congress. We will claim, the will of the people is more important than one dead man’s wish. If he is still alive, then the will of the people is more important than one man’s wish. This must be repeated, to counteract the other side’s “sympathy.” 47
Posted by 357 on Sat, 24 May 2008 13:58 | # EA Steve, Have you ever heard the saying: “I thought the most nauseating liberals were Jews, until I meet a liberal Irishman”. >> “Note: I am not necessarily arguing against past arguments opposed to White Gentile-Jewish integration. I am merely providing another way to look at the Jewish Question.” That’s the philosophy of Ian Jobling’s Inverted World. You might find his blog edifying? http://inverted-world.com/index.php/articles/articles/the_insanity_of_david_duke/ 48
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 25 May 2008 18:57 | # I just read Steve Sailer’s article advocating “citizenism” for what must be the sixth time, reading carefully and concentrating, as I did all the other times, and I still can’t understand it. Anybody help me out with this? I keep getting the impression Steve has a meaning behind the words which he doesn’t want to come out and say. The thing is, if you disregard race you’re fundamentally wrong and there isn’t any way around that. You’re wrong. Now, Steve has obviously given “citizenism” a lot of thought and I’ve never known him to be flat-out wrong about anything he’s given this much thought to. So, is he really saying something else but in code? That’s what I ask myself as I read the thing but I can’t figure out what it is he’s saying in code. 49
Posted by Matra on Sun, 25 May 2008 20:48 | # EA Steve:I forgot the source, but I read somewhere, that Ted Kennedy explained “why” he hated his race. In the article, Ted claimed that he saw “Irish Need Not Apply” signs. For all it said, it could have been discrimination from non-Catholics, or even a non-White. But that is irrelevant; he noticed discrimination, if he was telling the truth. There’s zero chance Kennedy is telling the truth. The whole “Irish Need Not Apply” thing is a myth spread by the usual victimologists and conservatives alike. (GOP shill boy Sean Hannity said on St Patrick’s Day he has one of those No Irish signs in his office or some place sacred to him as a reminder of what his cry-baby ancestors allegedly had to put up with, the poor dears). We know the self-consciously Irish Kennedy clan have been into immigrant (ie. anti-WASP) causes since the 19th century so it would not surprise me if Teddy tried to get in one last shot. He’ll do it for HoneyFitz 50
Posted by 357 on Sun, 25 May 2008 22:05 | # Re, Steve Sailors article. Steve Sailer’s really on to something. I think he’s right when he indicates white-nationalism is a losing proposition; however, “citizenism” is our best hope for whites to survive and thrive in the USA. But here’s the problem: Citizenism and it’s daughter patriotism are being suffocated by the ‘politics of hostile racial division’ and globalism. The worst radical leftist elements (who are working from within the “establishment”, i.e., the enemy within) did their job well by destroying our trust and sense of loyalty in and towards our own fellow citizens. I see nothing wrong with maintaining racial separation and at the same time promoting the common cause of citizenism/patriotism. Is it too late? Did the massive Mexican invasion destroy any real hope we have to make a concept like citizenism keep us from destroying each other? The government’s solution is to take away our guns and enact hate-speech laws. 51
Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 26 May 2008 01:04 | # 357, JW Holliday critiqued Sailer’s citizenism here and here. I don’t think it’s possible to promote the ties of blood and the values of culture at the same time. They are mutually-destructive. 52
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 26 May 2008 14:27 | # From the “Words can’t express” department: Everyone will by now have seen this. Well ... what is there left to say, except, Welcome to life under the new post-‘60s Jewish Hegemony, Euros, and have a very happy decline into permanent oblivion! 53
Posted by 357 on Mon, 26 May 2008 15:14 | # “JW Holliday critiqued Sailer’s citizenism here and here.” Thanz for the links, GW. JW Holliday certainly discredited Sailer’s promotion of “citizenism” as an effective means to combat those that are assaulting our EGI. In fact, he shattered it to smithereens! 54
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 27 May 2008 05:06 | # Steve Sailer makes a prediction of what the future holds:
So are GnXp.com and Prof. Steven Pinker, the former because for racial reasons they refuse to acknowledge EGI, the latter because for personal ethnic reasons he refuses to acknowledge the full range of racial science. As for the fact that National Review is now become part of the problem just like Time and Newsweek, what is the ethnicity of those who currently control it? Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, where these questions are concerned ethnicity neatly explains what was previously “a mystery.” 55
Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 27 May 2008 09:22 | # Fred, Steve is a very bright guy, and I’m sure very personable, but if he continues pushing his Citizenism concept he also becomes part of the problem. And, ethnicity-wise, you could be right in Steve’s case too, because knowing what we know about his own ethnicity, we can surmise that as the reason he places an artifical construct of belonging to a polity above the natural sense of brotherhood with a people. All of which only goes to prove what a remarkable man and stout comrade you are. 56
Posted by 357 on Tue, 27 May 2008 16:39 | # “Steve is a very bright guy, and I’m sure very personable, but if he continues pushing his Citizenism concept he also becomes part of the problem.” Here I go, swimming against the current again….but I ask: couldn’t citizenship be used as sort of triage? First we need to sort out the victims that at least 70 years of liberalism has wrought. Or to put it another way, citizenism can serve as a transition-phase from the pathetic condition we find ourselves in to a WN ideology. To go from where we’re at now straight into WN ain’t gonna happen. If it could, it would’ve already happened. We need a more practical strategy; one that’s based in unassailable moral principles. What scares me is the growing numbers of white couples consciously choosing not to have kids. The reason is: they look around a see how screwed up things are in the world. Why would they want to bring white kids into a world that is growing extremely hostile to them. Citizenism could serve to provide an atmosphere of security, thus providing hope for the future white generations. This in turn would reverse the hopelessness many whites are experiencing. If demographics is destiny, then we need to provide the secure atmosphere for whites to want to invest in the future of our race and have lots of kids. One thing for sure, WN in its current form is failing. Let’s at least try new approaches. 57
Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 27 May 2008 22:45 | # 357, Citizenism appears to me to be really nothing more than constitutional patriotism + white supremacism. But what happens after 2050 when all those white couples consciously choosing now not to have kids pitch whites into a minority. To whom will the supreme crown fall? I think ethnic nationalism is immeasurably more honest and safe. WN does not work, granted. But what do you expect, given the quality of the people who’ve been selling it. 58
Posted by 357 on Wed, 28 May 2008 15:19 | # GW said: “Citizenism appears to me to be really nothing more than constitutional patriotism + white supremacism.” I really don’t think white supremacism is part of the citizenism equation. Let’s look at how Sailer himself defines citizenism:- “By “citizenism,” I mean that I believe Americans should be biased in favor of the welfare of our current fellow citizens over that of the six billion foreigners.” Okay, citizenism is a starting point for whites to get off their ethnomasochistic and self-inflicted suicidal trend. In America, if 200,000,000 whites can coalesce around a concept like citizenism, they surly would elect politicians that would advance anti-immigration policies. Juan McAmnesty certainly wouldn’t be the presumptive nominee for the Republican party. I’d go so far to say that the Democratic party nominee would also be singing a stop the third world immigration song. And so what if only whites participate in citizenism. We, here, already know blacks and all the other non-whites will continue to tenaciously promote their own EGI. Soon whites will clearly see, once again, the unbridgeable divide between the races and will eventually adopt attitudes that are pro-white and thus, pro-segregation .... At the present time, the white masses (here in America) are too fearful of being identified as supporting a White National ideology. It has too many negative connotations attached to it, so they keep it at a safe distance. Conversely, citizenism doesn’t have a negative connotation; however, it can, hopefully, as it runs its course produce similar results as WN. GW said: “I think ethnic nationalism is immeasurably more honest and safe.” Your right, GW, that ethnic nationalism is the best course to take for European countries. They each have, for the most part, separate and distinct ethnic groupings. But here in America, White Nationalism is the best prescription due to the fact whites in America are largely of mixed European ancestry. My own grandparents came from four different European countries; one eastern and three are from western countries. But again, we need a transitional phase to take us from where the white masses are now to a white-national/preservationist mindset. GW said: “WN does not work, granted. But what do you expect, given the quality of the people who’ve been selling it.” If you’re referring to the quality of people who just comment on WN web-sites with less than leadership abilities such as myself, I’d agree with you. But we have very qualified individuals selling WN, e.g., Jared Taylor, and the late Sam Frances to name just two. GW, you, too, provide direction and leadership. Our biggest problem, of course, is that of marketing. WN is barred from being marketed in the MSM. Our message can’t reach the masses. When on certain occasions it does mange to slip through the media censors, they then immediately launch a campaign to distort and demonize our message beyond all recognition. Maybe a softer, kinder, gentler approach can be marketed in the MSM. Citizenism (or something similar to it) could serve to provide such an approach? Without effective marketing, we’re going nowhere. Even if citizenism or a variation of that type of movement gains traction, the left will undoubtedly do everything it can to prevent it from succeeding. But we already know the left is implacably against anything that is pro-white. If we can persuade those whites in the middle to lean towards our way of thinking rather than leaning to those on the left, then the balance will be tipped in our favor. Only then will we be able to stop and reverse the stealth genocide being perpetrated against us. 59
Posted by silver on Wed, 28 May 2008 19:26 | # I think Sailer sees citizenism as the best that can be achieved in the current climate; not that he thinks it’s the best political arrangement of all. Those who came across the concept at the time Sailer first mentioned it will recall that Jared Taylor wrote an article criticising it and a brief debate ensued. In response to Taylor’s remark about duty not calculating the odds of success Sailer said that duty and honour may not “but I do”. How is one to take that comment (“but I do”) except as a concession that Taylor is essentially right (and honourable) but, for now, thoroughly impractical? Sailer may also be suffering from the all too common nordic malady that resolutely refuses to exclude anyone; mercifully, that’s a malady that, as Scrooby has pointed out, far fewer southern and eastern euros suffer from. (I’ll bet some Greek nationalist out there, some Hrisi Avgi type, will soon take care of this horrible negress http://deviousdiva.com/ a Jam,aican in Athens conspiring to pack in as many Africans and other turd worlders into Greece as possible.) 60
Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 28 May 2008 21:10 | # Whether Boas or Hirschfeld, white nationalism is just another Jewish construct, a stick with which to beat the Nordicists.
61
Posted by silver on Wed, 28 May 2008 23:00 | # If that comment was directed my way, Desmond, I think you’re aware that I’ve long agreed that WN is BS. BUT…there are certain commonalities there, both in genes and in purpose. This means that one “white” or “euro” group, with which, rightly or wrongly (according to you), many other whites do, to varying degrees, identify, can lead the way, at least somewhat, or simply get the ball rolling, or speed that ball up. Why not use that? I’d like an answer, if you don’t mind—you know, rather than continuing to find innovative ways (I’d never heard the above) of making the same point, one already long ago conceded. 62
Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 29 May 2008 00:28 | # If that comment was directed my way, Desmond… No not particularly. However, if you’ve never heard of the above then how could it be, the suggestion that WN is a Jewish construct, conceded long ago? It’s of interest because it furthers KMac’s point about multiple strategies. 63
Posted by 357 on Thu, 29 May 2008 00:35 | # “If that comment was directed my way, Desmond, I think you’re aware that I’ve long agreed that WN is BS.” Silver, according to your logic:- if WN is BS, then the belief that ‘race is a only social construct’ is the epitome of truth. Please stop the absurdities. 65
Posted by Matra on Thu, 29 May 2008 03:10 | # WN is a Jewish construct Why do say it is Jewish? Was National Socialism a jewish construct? No. It was not WN either, just ask the Czechs. Sailer may also be suffering from the all too common nordic malady that resolutely refuses to exclude anyone; Isn’t that more of an American (perhaps New World) malady that has only recently infected northern Europeans? 66
Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 29 May 2008 04:16 | # Why do say it is Jewish? Destroying the concept of intra-European differences served Jewish interests. A white race construct is, de facto, inclusive of Jews. Thus Hirschfeld focues his racism charge against Nordicists, targeting their belief in separate European races. Boas used the same approach with the Grantians. Exclusion of eastern Europeans meant exclusion of Jews.
67
Posted by EA (European American) Steve on Thu, 29 May 2008 23:26 | # White Nationalism and Citizenship are key ideologies! In the rest of the West (especially America): We need to promote both ideologies. Citizenship will be the mainstream cause. Non-Whites and unaware Whites will be free to join, unknowingly supporting White interests and knowingly supporting citizen interests. White Nationalism will bring in Whites willing to support it. Those who don’t want to become White Nationalists, can still support our most important interests. White Nationalism will be placed in the background, building its reserves, for when the time is right; when it’s mainstream to be WN (White Nationalist). Citizenism will be the Middle ideology, serving more as a bridge. It will be the official policy, working with environmentalism, containing illegal immigration and limiting legal immigration. It will support our interests to limit non-White immigration; and it will support American interests to limit immigration, for when the economy crashes. First, we must limit immigration, transcending race. If the non-Whites don’t like it, and stop us, then it should provide fuel for our cause, later on. 68
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 30 May 2008 03:42 | # Apparently vying with everything he’s got for the title of “Britain’s Most Odious Human, 2008” is Labour MEP Richard Corbett. Here’s Fjordman:
Elsewhere at BrusselsJournal.com:
But Corbett isn’t being frank there, in that explanation of why he wants this measure. In his blog he comes clean and tells the real reason: he wants it in order to prevent what he calls fascists, Holocaust deniers, racists, and xenophobes, as well as any who have doubts about the direction the E.U. is taking, from ever gaining a toehold in the European power structure. From the swine Corbett’s own blog:
So, in his blog this totalitarian discloses that which he hides from the media, in regard to his real motivations for pushing this measure. From the comments thread at View From the Right, where Lawrence Auster blogged on this subject:
Where totalitarian the ability to inspire fright, sheer terror actually, in decent people is concerned, Corbett is definitely in Red Ken Livingstone’s league. No doubt about that. Everyone has seen that absolutely terrifying smile on Red Ken’s face? That smiling face that makes Hannibal Lecter look like Mary Poppins? Well, I’ve seen a couple of pix of this Corbett specimen and they’re no better in that regard: the man is frightening. JWH blogs on this Corbett outrage here. (Anyone know if Corbett’s ethnicity is other than English/British, by the way? For him to be this odious there may be something hidden.) 69
Posted by 357 on Fri, 30 May 2008 14:40 | # “Citizenism will be the Middle ideology, serving more as a bridge…”—EA (European American) Steve That’s exactly the way I see how citizenism could work towards the advancement of WN, Steve. 70
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 30 May 2008 15:01 | # Make that his ethnicity or sexuality: either Jewish ethnicity or homosexuality could explain his astoundingly harmful thinking and behaviour; for that matter, so could having a spouse or adopted child of a non-Euro race. So the “ethnicity” consideration refers to him or members of his family. But the take-home point here, clearly, is this man’s thinking is not normal: it must be the result of intense hatred/resentment/bitterness, or breathtaking confusion, or outright insanity, or diabolical malice, or appalling stupidity (stupidity this extreme is presumably ruled out by the fact he matriculated at Oxford University), or ordinary corruption (is he simply bought by interests behind the scenes the way Blair was?), or some other cause. This frightening man’s thinking is not that of a normal person. 71
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 30 May 2008 23:29 | # The Brussels totalitarians are galloping full speed, right straight ahead as if nothing existed in the universe except their own naked totalitarianism: 72
Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 30 May 2008 23:58 | # Don’t worry about Richard Corbett, Fred. It’s a non-issue for nationalists, which perhaps JW doesn’t understand. The only way out of the EU project is through power at the national level. The EU parliament has not a single power worthy of the name, and cannot influence the drive towards globalism, whatever its political colour. In any case, Corbett is not allowing for the sea-change in national politics over the next twelve months. The European Parliament election takes place in early June next year, by which time the Labour Party, still under Brown, will be polling under 20%. Corbett will be knighted when he loses his seat, and will never be out of work. 73
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 31 May 2008 01:09 | # GW, thanks for your reassurances in regard to Richard “The Most Odious Man Alive” Corbett: I do feel a little better now. Something else positive: A tiny smidgen of good news on the Nekschot affair: the Dutch public, according to Snouck, sympathised with the cartoonist instead of the government, reacting negatively to the arrest and lengthy detainment for purposes of interrogation (and, Snouck suspects, for purposes of intimidation as well). And of course we mustn’t forget there’s been other good news lately, including the BNP’s successes of course, coupled with Labour’s not-seen-in-forty-years rout, and the Italian elections with solid gains by the Northern League including the mayoralty of Rome going to a man on that side of the political spectrum. But what was jaw-dropping about the BrusselsJournal.com article I linked in my comment of 10:29 PM (a couple above) was the detailed lengths to which the Brussels totalitarians intend to go in writing their additional laws against “discrimination”: if anyone clicks on the article I linked, don’t stop reading after the translation of Le Pen’s statement which comes near the beginning, but keep reading further down, where they translate paragraph after paragraph after paragraph of the “fine print” of these insane anti-discrimination statutes, which go on, and on, and on, and on seemingly forever, attempting to cover even the tiniest most microscopic conceivable transgressions of absolute “inclusion,” “non-discrimination,” “tolerance,” or whatever these psychos are labeling it. Jim Kalb tries heroically, in a new piece, to analyse what you’re really, at bottom, seeing in those pages and pages of detailed extensions and refinements of existing anti-discrimination statutes which are like the obsessive-compulsive neurotic repeatedly washing his hands because he keeps thinking they’re not clean enough — there’s no end to it. I used to think along the same lines Jim sets forth but lately I’ve come around to the notion that that sort of analysis corresponds to the vague pre-modern miasma theories of infectious disease, whereas the whole thing might be better explainable by more specific germ theory of infectious disease introduced of course by Louis Pasteur in the final overthrow of the vague miasma-type theories. Furthermore, notice that the Pasteur-type germ model of disease offers the potential for a cure while the older miasma-type theoried didn’t. 74
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 31 May 2008 01:33 | # In explicit support of Kalb’s view, though, it must be said, is directive number 42 in that partial list, in which these totalitarian bureaucrats make clear that one of the things they’re defending above all else is the market — paragraph # 42 comes right out and says it — the thing before which tradition, nation, race, religion, sex distinctions, family, heritage, normalness itself, must remain prostrate:
Yes whole nations are called upon to go right down the tubes to permanent oblivion, in order that the market be not in any way hindered. The mask has slipped there a little, giving a tiny glimpse of what they’re really about: everything must be gotten rid of except 1) the smooth functioning of “markets,” 2) “rational” expertise spouted by government-approved “experts,” and so on, as Kalb says — everything else must go, leaving only .... well, leaving only what was patiently explained to Winston Smith in that excerpt from Orwell I posted above (2:42 AM), copied from a VFR reader’s comment. What vision Orwell had! 75
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 31 May 2008 04:24 | # From the “Yeah Things Are Bad But Hey, They Could Be A Whole Lot Worse!” dept: The great Joe Guzzardi gives further reason to count our blessings:
76
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 31 May 2008 13:52 | # Speaking of Ted Kennedy, the people who discount ethnicity in evaluating all that’s going on are blind fools. Kennedy’s entire career had as one of its fundamental pillars the felt need on the part of this Irish Catholic, steeped from the tenderest age in Irish Catholic anti-WASP tradition, to really and truly get revenge by sticking it to the WASPs who built America, never mind what that would do to the country. Revenge came first. Same with the Jews: the bad inflicted on society by most of these supposedly “generic, non-demininational” Jewish liberals/leftists/communists is born of their deep ethnicity-based Eurochristian hatred. 77
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 31 May 2008 15:32 | # Prior to reading about them just now here and taking the occasion to browse their web-site, I’d been only vaguely aware of this outfit founded about the same time as MajorityRights.com, Dissident Congress. Here are a few of their statements, taken from their site at the second link:
[...]
78
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:01 | # Church of England Bishop, the Right Reverend Nazir-Ali, a transplanted Indian Subcontinental and, from everything I’ve seen, a very good man, an excellent man (incomparably worthier, for example, than the pathetic Rowan Williams), engages in some unusual frankness about what’s wrong, but one gets the impression from his words he may not realize the sheer magnitude of what it is he’s up against (and we with him):
The Bishop is on the right track but to really plumb the depths of what it is we’re dealing with he may wish to peruse this piece by James Kalb, then (on a different tack, but the thing we’re studying has different facets) study this explanation of the new religion which has replaced Christianity, Judaeo-Holocaustian Race-Replacementianity, summarized in its essentials by James Bowery starting at the sub-heading which reads, “Expanding on some of my esoteric terminology.” As a bishop in a church that has been taken over by the new religion, the Right Reverend Nazir-Ali should at least know something about it. 79
Posted by tomescu teofan emilian on Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:42 | # How interesting ! As always it is wistle-blowers who get the flack for the sins of our societies fashioned according to the establishment’s whims( the right,conservatives). Not a word about trade imbalances about globalised greed and islamophobia.I personally do not need your quotations I have my own mind to see through their smokescreen.All the world’s politicians are scum including the left who is on the left because the right aisle was already taken.That said you are not fair in blaming only the left as if they stood for everything that goes wrong in this world.Moreover leave out the true ecologists they are not on the left they only care about us all and all those who fail to see this are either brainwashed or alien to this planet and thrive on pollution. Post a comment:
Next entry: Presentation and the problem of extremis
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by EA (European American) Steve on Sat, 17 May 2008 04:08 | #
Interesting post! The neo-Marxists are at it again. They will never stop, until our race is extinguished (and at least Europe is Islamized) and/or when they are permanently neutralized.
The quotes from the British politicians is most frightening!
Great Literature piece!