Posted by Leadership Society.Blind Obedience. on Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:54 | #

TOR is the choice of dissidents and intelligence agents worldwide,  meaning it’s probably US-funded. Who screens the source code? Perhaps TOR secretly transmits traffic in parallel to a machine recording everything? Perhaps the software includes a keystroke logger?

Posted by Steven Palese on Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:21 | #

Thanks Guessedworker but actually the mantra is in fact Bob Whitaker’s as indeed is this whole model of internet activism. All I did really was write it all down.

This model has been in operation for quite some time now at Bob’s blog, where a team of activists has already been raising hell posting the mantra all over the net.

All the handbook does is lay out in precise practical terms the steps necessary to participate in this form of activism. I wrote it exactly one week ago when I started my own activist blog. So after one week of activism involving about 3 hours of activism a day, I can report I’ve contacted 300 people:

http://extremetracking.com/open;unique?login=mantra77

Far more were actually exposed to the mantra (or riddle) but 300 became curious enough to actually click the link and reach the blog. The blog’s role is to record traffic and pass it on to the websites running this activist model:

nationalsalvation.net - where the best posts are archived
whitakeronline.org/blog/ - Bob’s blog

The hope is that new arrivals will join the effort and become activists themselves. If a decent percentage, say 1% decides to do so, then that means that 1 activist can generate 3 more activists per week, every week (assuming 300 hits/week).

Ok maybe 1% is optimistic, but it’s worth trying out this model and seeing where it goes.

In short, it’s an experiment. However, if it succeeds the reward would be substantial since the model is designed for exponential growth. It’s something of an internet chain letter. Moreover, since it’s all public domain any pro-white website can adopt the model if it wants to.

Recap: This model is very simple. All you do is go to forums and blogs and copy/paste the mantra with your link. People click the link and reach the activism websites where they’re encouraged to join the activist effort. It takes 10 minutes to set up the blog to get going. 10 minutes.

If you are a conscientious white person who wants to do something, well here’s something you can do. Whether you spend one hour a day or one hour a month it’s up to you. At least you’re doing something for your people instead of sitting there simmering in resentment.

Mantra77

Posted by National Meritocracy on Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:04 | #

Perhaps it’s better to concentrate energies into building a general news site that is competitive with the New York Times.

Five-to-ten quality PAID FULL-TIME writers at one site beats 5,000 scattered, well-intentioned but rinky-dink blogs. Anyway, you just don’t want know-littles diluting the message with weak arguments and mental misfires.

Posted by Steven Palese on Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:19 | #

Thanks Fred, I’m using that intro (along with the riddle)in big websites worth reposting in, such as libertyforum or alternet.org. (You can’t post the mantra repeatedly in the same place or you get banned for spamming, you must make a few regular posts between mantras)

It has nothing to do with equality or progress. The gramscian Racial Extortion Coalition wants mass immigration in order to increase its demographic power. This power they then use to insure there is:

More affirmative action discrimination in education;
More “no whites allowed” race based private scholarships;
More race quotas in private hiring;
More race norming employment tests;
More separate pool executive hiring;
More minority layoff protection;
More sensitivity training;
More minority promotion networks;
More “no whites allowed” contract set-asides;
More minority-only tax breaks

And ever more racist discrimination slammed onto the backs of our children for being white and only for being white.

It’s a power play by pro-minority chauvinists designed to extract more and more racial privileges off our kids, nothing more. It is motivated by a mix of opportunism and race hatred and certainly not “equality” or “progress”.

——————
Bob’s Riddle

All anti-white racists agree that it’s ok for whites to become minorities in their own countries. All anti-white racists also agree that a Japanese person who wants to become a minority in his own country is either a traitor or clinically insane. Therefore, what is an anti-white racist? Answer

Libertyforum

It’s something of a one-move checkmate and the responses I get are absolutely hysterical. It presses them so tightly into a corner they erupt like a septic tank backflush. These people make even better recruiters than the mantra! When white people walk into these threads and step into this kind of seething anti-white race hatred bubbling all over, they’re bound to wake up.

Here’s a sample response from alternet.org:

Really, no one cares about your children. You and they are just a bunch of round heads. You probably have some kind of illusion about being equal to your white “betters”, but Dubya wasn’t talking about you and people like you when he said, “You’re my base.” Nope, in your case, he’d probably have mumbled something unintelligible that was MEANT to say, “You’re just base.”

Sharing the playing field doesn’t make it more one color than another.
People who bring enough brains and know-how to the table aren’t threatened by others who have brains and know-how.
Poor whites in America scare themselves silly with their racist myths about affirmative action. But if it weren’t for affirmative action—that is to say, the ORIGINAL “affirmative” action—whites wouldn’t own nearly all the land in the United States, hold most of the jobs in universities and private industry, etc., etc.
Middle class white kids are cut breaks all the time. Get over it when a Black, Brown, or Red one lucks out.
Most workplaces are STILL nearly 100% lily white with the exception of government where apparent incompetence is not race-dependent (obviously).
Look, if you’re a loser or your kids are losers, own it and shut up. You’re in everybody’s way, including other whites. Whites with anything to offer don’t waste their time with the old, worn-out saw about “racist affirmative action” and “race quotas” for hiring.
Very few people of color know Billy Joe whose daddy owns the corporation or runs some department or other. So, they don’t get in the door that way. Since you frightened types who have nothing to bring to the table always found ways to keep them out, well then those Black, Brown, and Red types fought for and GOT affirmative action.
You’re not angry because of anything WE did to YOU. You’re angry because you don’t enjoy the same amount of privilege you used to have. THAT’S what’s really got you pissed off. That and the fact that, in an ever-changing world, you’re unable to keep up.

When you use the intro bear in mind that each of the grievances listed comes straight out of Yggdrasil’s Race Bias series:

http://www.whitenationalism.com/rb/index.htm

They all come with citations from the Wall Street Journal, NY Times or LA Times. So if anyone questions any of the items listed, go there, copy the newspaper extracts and paste them onto the denier’s face. Don’t let them off the hook. You want to keep them cornered, the more they screech anti-white race hatred the better.

Posted by Count Sudoku on Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:27 | #

Not to nitpick, but wouldn’t the anti-white racists be fine with the Japanese or any Japanese person wanting to become a minority in their own country? Or at least lie and say they were?

Posted by Steven Palese on Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:14 | #

Responses to miscellaneous comments:

TOR is the choice of dissidents and intelligence agents worldwide, meaning it’s probably US-funded. Who screens the source code? Perhaps TOR secretly transmits traffic in parallel to a machine recording everything? Perhaps the software includes a keystroke logger?

TOR is open source, i.e. the code is written by volunteers and is public. This means any geek worth his keyboard can spot any such interference within 3 milliseconds. Nobody funds TOR because open source projects dont need funding.

Perhaps it’s better to concentrate energies into building a general news site that is competitive with the New York Times.

http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/ is a pro-white lobby with a news service. People who want to help by writing checks or reading news should go there.

What we’re doing is offering an alternative for people who can’t write checks but want to help anyway. Money and power are for the establishment to leverage, our side has numbers so let’s leverage that.

Five-to-ten quality PAID FULL-TIME writers at one site beats 5,000 scattered, well-intentioned but rinky-dink blogs. Anyway, you just don’t want know-littles diluting the message with weak arguments and mental misfires.

These are not 5,000 news blogs. They are not blogs one updates. Once you’ve created the blog with mantra and tracker, that’s it. You add nothing else.

Nor are activists expected to argue with anyone while posting the mantra around the net. In fact we recommend they post and move on, post and move on.

In other words, this has nothing to do with providing news. It’s about attracting activists who will work to attract more activists in a feedback loop. We are not interested in attracting news readers, we want activists.

Not to nitpick, but wouldn’t the anti-white racists be fine with the Japanese or any Japanese person wanting to become a minority in their own country? Or at least lie and say they were?

The riddle is intended to disturb the moral certainties of collaborators and to remind them what they are. I agree that most minority racists are quite likely to resent the Japanese as well. After all the Japanese have built a successful society that humiliates them every day by reminding them of their homeland’s failure to do same.

But to answer your question, if they pretend (lie) they’re all for no borders for anyone, ask them why you can’t see a single organized lobby screeching for open borders for Japan. Don’t they feel their human rights have been violated because they’re not allowed to colonize Japan?

So if they play that hand, they just expose their hypocrisy even further. And if you have the time to dwell on the thread you can ridicule them all day:

Why oh why can’t the Japanese treat us like HUMAN BEINGS!? Please help me, I can’t sleep anymore knowing of this ABUSE of my HUMAN RIGHT to colonize Japan!! Etc etc.

Posted by second class citizen on Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:57 | #

As far as TOR is concerned, we have to look at the alternatives, and who is going to be monitoring.

I don’t know of any open source alternatives to TOR that are superior. By definition, anything you can’t personally inspect the code of is less secure than something open source. i.e. any of the myriad “anonymizer” type websites.

Even though open source, whether one coder has the time to spot some sort of vulnerability is uncertain. TOR has known vulnerabilities anyway. From the FAQ:

http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#RemainingAttacks

“As mentioned above, it is possible for an observer who can view both you and either the destination website or your Tor exit node to correlate timings of your traffic as it enters the Tor network and also as it exits. Tor does not defend against such a threat model.

In a more limited sense, note that if a censor or law enforcement agency has the ability to obtain specific observation of parts of the network, it is possible for them to verify a suspicion that you talk regularly to your friend by observing traffic at both ends and correlating the timing of only that traffic. Again, this is only useful to verify that parties already suspected of communicating with one another are doing so. In most countries, the suspicion required to obtain a warrant already carries more weight than timing correlation would provide.

Furthermore, since Tor reuses circuits for multiple TCP connections, it is possible to [WWW] associate non anonymous and anonymous traffic at a given exit node, so be careful about what applications you run concurrently over Tor. Perhaps even run separate Tor clients for these applications. “

Those attacks look to be in the domain of alphabet soup agencies. Assuming that they can find you if they want is a good idea. But so what?

I’d imagine that there are three main adversaries you could be dealing with here.
1. Alphabet soup agency.
2. High level private anti-White activist groups (think ADL).
3. Garden variety lefties.

An alphabet soup agency might record your activities. It might correlate them with an IP. Possibly even your name. But you are doing nothing even remotely illegal, so why would they bother you? They might arrange to have John Lennon shot, but some anonymous ethnic activist comment spammer with 300 click throughs, half of whom are probably lefties anyway, is nothing.

High level (i.e. mucho resources) private groups like the ADL are also unlikely to have the resources or the inclination to go after this sort of low-level activity. They are more likely to put pressure on popular forum moderators, owners and governments to include so-called anti-hate speech stuff in their legal boilerplate and moderation guidelines. Far easier and more effective. Also looks better when it comes to soliciting donations.  Which will attract more donations? “This year, we almost got Mel Gibson jailed, shut down 5 major neo-Nazi websites, and jailed 2 prominent historians.” Versus “This year, we found the names and details of 1500 comment spammers, but couldn’t release them because
a) It would cause distrust of our surveillance methods and they might develop tougher countermeasures to counter the vulnerability, hampering our surveillance of higher profile subjects.
b) Some of them might sue us.
c) We called some of them up, but they just deny everything, and agree to make whatever statements we tell them to.
So… just take our word for it. We’re watchin’ ‘em, and if they try anything bad, we’ll go after ‘em BIG TIME!”

Garden variety card leftie loonies are the most important people TOR will defend against. Likely, you will annoy the local lefties (and perhaps local lefty mods) of what ever forum or blog you decide to spam. This is where TOR would come in, keeping you effectively anonymous from people whose budget derives from the dole and/or parents.

Posted by second class citizen on Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:54 | #

On internet activism in general, I think you can make an impact by:

1) Frequenting sites that your target audience frequent, i.e. unawakened Whites. I.e. just generally popular English speaking sites.
2) Making comments that are verifiable and jarringly true. Keep it calm, short, logical and analytical. Especially short.
3) Focus on the hypocrisy - i.e. point out things that are unfair, especially why are we singled out?
4) Use leftist language when you can, i.e. “oppressed”, “privilege”, “unfair”, “genocide”, etc.
5) Provide a link to back you up.
6) Always question why there is little coverage of these facts in media/schools.

Above all, know your history and current events. Virtually everything that we have done to someone else and are asked to abase ourselves for has or is being done to us. Double standards abound.

Some examples? Here is a short laundry list of notions common misconceptions you can correct in your travels, feel free to add more:

Holocaust: -> Ukrainian genocide - set precedent, bigger, largely Jewish perpetrators, White victims. Has nothing to do with holocaust “denial”. No major movies. Why?

Crusades: Were preceded by unprovoked Islamic crusades into the heart of Europe (i.e. Tours in France, included Islamic subjugation of Portugal and Spain).

Black slavery: Preceded by enslavement of White people by Turks and Arabs, for longer time period.

Discriminatory treatment of White versus non-White independence movements - see treatment of Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Ghandi, Mandela vs. Duke, Griffin et al in media.

Miscegenation: Jewish high schools get away with turning away non-Jewish prom dates all the time.

Segregation, apartheid: see Israel.

WWII, various (to be used whenever someone mentions the “Greatest Generation” or the supposed nobility of WWII):
-Population and industrial size of Allies vs Axis, huge disparity, hence Allies are the bullies, Axis the underdog.
-Invasion of Poland didn’t trigger England/France to declare war on Soviet Union, why not? It should have.
-Hitler was damned if he did, damned if he didn’t.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barbarossa#The_Soviet_offensive_plans_theory
-Allied warcrimes (Dresden bombing, Japan firebombing/nuking went unpunished, hence victor’s justice, winner writes history books)
-German slave labor in POW camps years after the war in both Soviet Union and in USA.
-Morgenthau plan, starvation rations in Germany post WWII. Why?
-Draconion limits of freedom of speech and democracy in occupied countries, an occupation that is still there in the better part of a century.
-America shot first in war by funding Soviets/England years before with Lend-Lease.

Call attention to the offensiveness of not capitalizing “White” when every other interest group gets capital letters.

Typical White disadvantage:
-Lack of secret minority language in which to communicate, hence discriminatory surveillance by police by default.
-White people can’t use “racial profiling” defense, hence discriminatory policing.
-racial quotas
-lack of independent media ownership, obviously

And of course, as Palesi alludes to, the glaring double standard in immigration laws in countries like Japan, Saudi Arabia, Israel, China, etc.

Those are just a few of the more obvious examples.

Internet activism is the intellectual equivalent to guerrilla warfare. Everywhere we are out-gunned, out-financed, and have less man hours than our adversaries. We must act accordingly.

A small ambush of truth, a quick tactical retreat followed by several lefties getting themselves worked up into a frenzy is a victory. They spend hours “hosing down the jungle” which is all wasted time. Few people have the time to read an illogical and hate filled strawman based attack. They see truth and fairness followed by vitriol and hypocrisy. It’s an easy choice to make.

If this is done enough, other people will start to do the research as well, once they see that the current situation is injust, we are the underdog etc. Enough digging will lead to a more complete understanding.

Posted by internet birthday suit on Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:18 | #

The TOR software is insecure unless trusted experts exhaustively examine the source code and all associated systems. Even with outbound packet monitoring, the user must have the assurance that traffic isnt routed through “their” nodes or transmit processor number or NIC number.

What’s the probability “alphabet soup” agencies tolerate a bypass to the present incarnation of Total Information Awareness? Zero, I suspect. The NSA aggressively funds software of this nature with grants and has for many, many years.

In practice, your PC is open house. (I doubt anyone here connects from an NSA-proof network.) Not only is identity difficult to obscure, none of your electromagnetic communication is presently securable from their observation.

These ppl arent jokers and incompetents. “Total Information Awareness” means business.

The hardware, software, and internet infrastructure is US-dominated. Meaning an alphabet soup organization can go speak with a chosen soft/hardware maker anytime and legally insert a backdoor or trojan.

Not only does an “activist” assume that all online communications is intercepted, they must assume that alphabet soup agencies can enter their internet-connected PC at will and listen to the audio in the room by turning on the mic, install keystroke loggers, read/upload any interesting files, and so forth. Total Access.

Any information you dont want them to have belongs on an offline system.

Posted by Steven Palese on Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:43 | #

For heaven’s sake get a grip people. We’re talking about using TOR to bypass hostile forum admins, not to hack into the pentagon. Nobody at NSA FBI PTA ABC XYZ whatever could care less if you post the mantra around the net. Nobody. If any such agency cared enough about pro-white expression on the net they would have wiped out the big pro-white websites with DOS attacks years ago.

Most DOS attacks that do occur originate from Israel, specifically from the haganah.il domain. They haven’t achieved much, have they? These losers can’t take down big targets, like stormfront with its million+ hits/day, nor small targets, like the millions of anti-zionist blogs and websites out there..

..but these lamers are going to crack TOR! And they’ll do it to get at small time activists pulling 300 contacts a week!

Ok whatever.

Seriously folks, get a grip already. Look at the kind of posts that are now NORMAL at the guardian, the times or daily mail websites and let’s not even get into the American equivalents. The mantra is actually MODERATE compared to what’s become ROUTINE.

Besides, the mantra isn’t about Jews. What bothers the powers that be is frank discussion of Jewish power. That has already spun so far out of control that it’s simply ludicrous to think the alphabet agencies are able to stop anything whatsoever, let alone focus everything they’ve got on cracking TOR to get at little YOU.

And get at you for what? Is posting the mantra illegal in the UK all of a sudden? Well when they arrest the thousands of Guardian commenters who’ve gone much further and discussed Jews, then - and only then - can you legitimately start wallowing in paranoia.

Anyway, you should bring all this up at Bob’s blog. Bob is a career washington insider who actually worked for these agencies. He knows exactly how bureaucratic and inept they are and would laugh himself silly reading half this stuff.

Posted by internet birthday suit on Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:43 | #

SP,

My comment wasn’t specifically directed at your post, but to the activist audience in general regarding information security. They need to know of the extent and quality of enemy armnaments in order to sidestep the sneakiest and most deadly blows.

Posted by ed on Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:59 | #

Discriminatory treatment of White versus non-White independence movements - see treatment of Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Ghandi, Mandela vs. Duke, Griffin et al in media.

Certainly, it appears non-White independence movements are poorly covered, seeing how you can’t even spell ‘Gandhi’.

Posted by Al Ross on Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:20 | #

Gandhi is mistakenly characterised as a symbol for the fight against racial injustice when, in fact, his concern,( as demonstrated by his total silence on the subject of Africans’ ‘rights of self-determination’ during his sojourn in British South Africa) was solely for the interests of Indians.

Posted by charles stalnaker on Thu, 17 May 2007 16:23 | #

Good Morning Mr. Pelesi…I just finished reading your column on David Duke’s websight re Jewish-controlled media in America…Fourteen years ago, i had a Public Access show in the Tampa Bay area for a year and a half…One of the shows I did was on the jewish-controlled American media…in doing my research, i discovered that Rupert Murdoch is Jewish…His mother was a full-blooded Jewess…I discovered this in an out-dated WHO’S WHO IN AMERICA in a public library in Pinellas Park, FL…Later copies of WWIA WERE SANITIZED OF THIS INFO…unfortunately, i do not remember the exact year (I believe it was in the 60’s) of that particular WWIA…Of course you are aware that if a person’s mother is Jewish, that person is considered BY JEWISH LAW to be Jewish…Keep up the good work ! ! ! ...Charles…

Posted by charles stalnaker on Thu, 17 May 2007 16:25 | #

THIS IS CORRECTED EMAIL ADDRESS…CHARLES STALNAKER

Posted by charles stalnaker on Thu, 17 May 2007 16:27 | #

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) is my corrected email address…charles stalnaker…

Posted by Steven Palese on Sun, 20 May 2007 23:32 | #

Charles Stalnaker, thanks for the info. Yes, I’ve seen quotes from the WWIA to that effect. I’ve also heard Murdoch’s financial angel, the man who made him by financing his aquisition spree, was Seagram’s Bronfman.
——

And on another note,

UPDATE ON INTERNET ACTIVISM GUIDE

After the one month test period there were a few problems with the conversion rate. So we’re changing the model quite radically in order to super simplify it. Basically we’ll try an affiliate type system where activists have unique URLs pointing straight to the main websites which lets us cut out the activism platform altogether. If you’re interested in the technicalities, check this thread :

http://whitakeronline.org/blog/2007/05/15/afkan-6/

In the above thread I also mention MR’s possible future role as adopter once we get the model working. Unfortunately, the cost of making it super easy for activists is increased techno-trickery for webmasters. Not sure what exactly this trickery will be since SysOp is still working on it. Anyway, I hope whoever is managing MR is ok with installing a tracker or at worst a php module.

Posted by Rnl on Mon, 21 May 2007 06:15 | #

solely for the interests of Indians

Arthur Kemp wrote several years ago about this inconvenient chapter in Gandhi’s biography. Unfortunately he felt the need to feign outrage at Gandhi’s “racism.” 

****

THE MYTH OF MAHATMA GANDHI

One the anachronisms of modern liberalism is that it elevates scoundrels to be heroes, and denigrates heroes into scoundrels.

And when it cannot do that, liberalism simply lies.

So it is the case with one of liberalism’s icons, Mahatma Gandhi. For, all over the world, Gandhi is held up as an icon of peace, pacifism, tolerance and brotherly love.

Statues are erected to him, his “example” is taught to Western schoolchildren, and Hollywood has even made a film about him.

In all of these, Gandhi is portrayed as the ultimate peacemaker, the living example of multiculturalism.

Sadly, liberalism and the truth have seldom met.

For in reality, Gandhi was a first class Indian racist who not only despised Blacks, but also other lower caste Indians!

Those of you who have been subjected to come “conventional” Gandhi propaganda will know that he was born in India, studied to become an attorney in England, spent many years “organising passive resistance” in South Africa, and then returned to India to lead the passive resistance movement against British rule in that country. He was finally assassinated by one of his own kind.

GANDHI THE ANTI-BLACK RACIST

So much for the known face of Gandhi; but herein lies the rub. Lying in the publicly accessible archives of the South African state records in Pretoria and in the Johannesburg public library are full sets of the newspaper which Gandhi started in that country” the “Indian Opinion.” 

From these, and the official compilation of Gandhi writings, the “Collected Works”, the true face of Gandhi emerges: an anti-Black Indian racist!

When Gandhi addressed a public meeting in Bombay on 26 September 1896, he had the following to say about the Indian struggle in South Africa: 

“Ours is one continued struggle against degradation sought to be inflicted upon us by the European, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw Kaffir, whose occupation is hunting and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with, and then pass his life in indolence and nakedness.” (Collected Works II p. 74).

In 1904, opposing the then White South African government’s plan to draw up a register of all non-Whites in the urban areas, Gandhi wrote:

“It is one thing to register natives who would not work, and whom it is very difficult to find out if they absent themselves, but it is another thing -and most insulting - to expect decent, hard-working, and respectable Indians, whose only fault is that they work too much, to have themselves registered and carry with them registration badges.” (Collected Works IV p. 193).

Commenting on a piece of legislation planned by the White Natal Municipal authority, called the Natal Municipal Corporation Bill, Gandhi wrote in his newspaper, the Indian Opinion on March 18 1905:

“Clause 200 makes provision for registration of persons belonging to uncivilized races, resident and employed within the Borough. One can understand the necessity of registration of Kaffirs who will not work, but why should registration be required for indentured Indians who have become free, and for their descendants about whom the general complaint is that they work too much?”

“COMPELLING THE NATIVES TO WORK”

The Indian Opinion published an editorial on September 9 1905 under the heading, “The relative Value of the Natives and the Indians in Natal”. In it, Gandhi referred to a speech made by Rev. Dube, an early African nationalist, who said that an African had the capacity for improvement, if only the Whites would give them the opportunity.

In his response, Gandhi suggested that “A little judicious extra taxation would do no harm; in the majority of cases it compels the native to work for at least a few days a year.”

Then he added:

“Now let us turn our attention to another and entirely unrepresented community - the Indian. He is in striking contrast with the native. While the native has been of little benefit to the State, it owes its prosperity largely to the Indians. While native loafers abound on every side, that species of humanity is almost unknown among Indians here.”

“THE PROMINENT RACE”

In the Government Gazette of Natal for Feb. 28 1905, a Bill was published regulating the use of fire-arms by Blacks and Indians. Commenting on the Bill, Gandhi wrote in his newspaper, the Indian Opinion on March 25 1905:

“In this instance of the fire-arms, the Asiatic has been most improperly bracketed with the natives. The British Indian does not need any such restrictions as are imposed by the Bill on the natives regarding the carrying of fire-arms. The prominent race can remain so by preventing the native from arming himself. Is there a slightest vestige of justification for so preventing the British Indian?”

Gandhi, like many caste conscious Indians (he was born to a fairly high shop owner caste) was all in favour of segregation from the “natives” as he liked to call Blacks. 

His reaction to a 1906 petition launched by non-Whites in South Africa to the British King, demanding voting rights, reveals this attitude clearly:

“It seems that the petition is being widely circulated, and signatures are being taken of all coloured people in the three colonies named. The petition is non-Indian in character, although British Indians, being coloured people, are very largely affected by it. We consider that it was a wise policy on the part of the British Indians throughout South Africa, to have kept themselves apart and distinct from the other coloured communities in this country.”  (Indian Opinion, March 24 1906).

THE FAMOUS TRAIN INCIDENT

In the Hollywood film made about Gandhi, much emphasis was placed on a scene where he was arrested for riding in a South African train coach reserved for Whites.

This incident did indeed occur, but for very different reasons than those the film portrayed! 

For the liberal myth is that Gandhi was protesting at the exclusion of non-Whites from the train coach: in fact, he was only trying to persuade the authorities to let ONLY upper caste Indians ride with the Whites. 

It was NEVER his intention to let Blacks, or even lower Caste Indians, to share the White compartment!

Here, in Gandhi’s own words, are his comments on this famous incident, complete with reference to upper caste Indians, who he differentiated from lower caste Indians by calling the former “clean”:

“You say that the magistrate’s decision is unsatisfactory because it would enable a person, however unclean, to travel by a tram, and that even the Kaffirs would be able to do so. But the magistrate’s decision is quite different. The Court declared that the Kaffirs have no legal right to travel by tram. And according to tram regulations, those in an unclean dress or in a drunken state are prohibited from boarding a tram. Thanks to the Court’s decision, only clean Indians or coloured people other than Kaffirs, can now travel in the trams.”  (Indian Opinion, 2 June 1906).

GANDHI SUPPORTED SEGREGATION

It is also a myth to presume that Gandhi was opposed to racial segregation. Witness this piece of his writing, published in his newspaper, Indian Opinion, of 15 February 1905. It was a letter to the White Johannesburg Medical Officer of Health, a Dr. Porter, concerning the fact that Blacks had been allowed to settle in an Indian residential area:

“Why, of all places in Johannesburg, the Indian location should be chosen for dumping down all Kaffirs of the town, passes my comprehension. Of course, under my suggestion, the Town Council must withdraw the Kaffirs from the Location. About this mixing of the Kaffirs with the Indians I must confess I feel most strongly. I think it is very unfair to the Indian population, and it is an undue tax on even the proverbial patience of my countrymen.” (Indian Opinion, 15 February 1905).

“PURITY OF RACE”

In response to the rise of White nationalist politics, which stressed racial separation, Gandhi wrote in his Indian Opinion of 24 September 1903:

“We believe as much in the purity of race as we think they do, only we believe that they would best serve these interests, which are as dear to us as to them, by advocating the purity of all races, and not one alone. We believe also that the white race of South Africa should be the predominating race.” (Indian Opinion, 24 September 1903).

On 24 December 1903, Gandhi added this in his Indian Opinion newspaper:

“The petition dwells upon ‘the commingling of the coloured and white races’. May we inform the members of the Conference that so far as British Indians are concerned, such a thing is particularly unknown. If there is one thing which the Indian cherishes more than any other, it is the purity of type.”

And yet the liberal delusion over Gandhi lives on ...

EXCALIBUR
=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=
An occasional ezine devoted to race, history, and current affairs
=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=X=

Posted by Al Ross on Mon, 21 May 2007 11:08 | #

Only an ignoramus would cofuse and conflate the defence of both the EGI and the Independence -seeking instincts of high-caste, Brahmin (for such was he) Aryan-descended Indians like Gandhi with the situation of Nigger savages in Edwardian South Africa.

Posted by Kurt Steiner on Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:56 | #

Psychological Study of Hussein Obama

The media has said that Obama is the greatest orator ever seen. His verbal
presentations have been called as exciting as Springsteen concerts, by Marxist
journalists. Yet even children notice no such orator power emanating from Obama.
He talks like a boring negro preacher. He uses that rhythm which the media calls
“hypnotic” but objective people refer to as boringly crude and phony.
He stumbles, over his rehearsed presentation as sane viewers look at the cheering
section of white people behind him. They are well made up to look like working
people but it is obvious that they have been recruited from the ranks of Marxist
academia. Their faces continually reflect worshipful awe and reverence for the
below average black man they call “the One.” Do you trust people who are so crazy
about a man who is involved with Marxist terrorists, plans to re-distribute working
men’s wages too the rich and blacks and oozes with deceit and evil?
Patti wood
If you have been watching Obama speak and give interviews you may have noticed
that he seems to reveal spot light more than even the most egotistical of political
candidates. He spends a half hour going through the crowd after he is introduced,
shaking hands like a Messiah. He has this condescending look down his nose at your
sneer when he talks to interviewers and looks especially perturbed and angry when
berating someone who he perceives is attacking him. He morphs his voice and body
language to suit each audience in a manner that goes beyond customization to easily
acting a part. I believe he is narcissistic. Here are other narcissistic nonverbal and
behavioral cues that one of my blog readers wrote about Obama.One of my readers
is getting his doctorate on evolution and ecology and wrote me:
“I’ve spent years trying to recognize the most accurate indicators of NPD
(Narcissistic Personality Disorder). There are a handful that I’ve come to trust,
though they’re a bit difficult to convey.
1. An amorphous expression that looks like a child, about three years old, needing
approval. I’ve almost never seen this expression in someone who isn’t NPD
(occasionally in Borderline Personality Disorder, a closely related type II
personality disorder). To me, it’s an exceptionally good indicator. It’s often a
fleeting micro-[removed]hard to catch without practice). It’s an expression of
yearning and need, directed toward the person they’re interacting with. In males,
it makes the face look like that of a little boy. Some psychologists argue that a
developmental stage goes awry in NPD, roughly around the age of three.
2. The eyes of NPDs usually have an unusual look. My face-reading friend describes
them as “dead eyes”. I perceive NPD eyes as “no boundary between inside and
outside”. Some people perceive them as magnetic. There’s reduced activity in some
of the musculature around the eyes. This includes a reduced response to emotionladen
scenes or speech (e.g. less of a startle response to disturbing visuals). At
times, it can produce a “detached” appearance - or a languid, even slightly sleepy
look. The startle response of pupils (e.g. to disturbing scenes) is often diminished
relative to normal people (both less of a change in pupil diameter, and a longer lag
before pupil size changes). I think people with NPD also spend less time playing
through internal imagery (visible in eye tracking and facial expressions).
3. There’s also something I call “frozen cheeks”. Muscles in the cheek region aren’t
as mobile as in normal people. This is partly due to a subtle expression of contempt
and partly due to increased control over appearance.
The contempt can often be an open clear-cut expression, but much of the time it’s
just a subtle tensing of the musculature, underlying the “apparent” expression.
Obama displays all of these (the first as micro expressions). There’s also his
entitlement body language, his glares, his cocked head and “looking down the nose”,
etc.. He occupies quite a bit of space and also frequently initiates physical contact
- e.g. putting his hand on someone’s back or arm.
An assured smooth gesture - in a way that’s slightly unusual given our culture’s
definition of personal boundaries. The anger in his face is kind of interesting.
Sometimes it’s blatant, but more often it’s a subtle expression. When Hillary
scores a solid point in a debate, or when a journalist challenges him in a question,
you can see a sustained increase in the subtle expression of anger. People with NPD
often have a high level of latent anger that can be triggered by any injury to selfimage
(narcissistic injury).
In case you haven’t seen these, here are a links to a couple of YouTube videos that
people have put together capturing some of Obama’s more blatant anger/contempt
expressions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9coNTKQi544
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvFSECcANZE&feature=related
People with NPD are typically hypercompetitive and hate losing. One woman I know
of would throw the checkerboard across the room if she lost a game of checkers
with her eight year old son. Obama is clearly hypercompetitive and is known as a
bad loser - people that he has played poker with comment on him being a poor loser,
and he’s said to be a bad loser in politics as well (e.g. when he lost to Bobby Rush).
Narcissists that I’ve known are generally charming and very well-liked (except by
those they’ve injured). They often set up a cult of personality, though on a much
smaller scale than Obama - a circle of admiring people.
There’s a need for a high level of admiration.
Paul Street, a progressive columnist, had the following observations after
attending an Obama rally in Iowa:
“So why wasn’t I dancing and singing along? Why did I have a terrible taste in my
mouth two hours after Obama’s speech even as the sun shone and the warm spring
breeze passed through my den just a mile east of the Pentacrest?
Part of it was the narcissism of the self-presentation. Obama does this creepy
thing after being introduced. He approaches the stage only after a good 5 minutes
of passing through a parting sea of applauding audience members.
Please. Candidates should stand humbly by the side of the stage and walk up right
after being introduced. I do not attend political rallies to see a pretend savior
savoring popular adulation as he dances through the cool stream of the multitude.”
Though people with NPD often cultivate a circle of admirers, they tend to have few
true friends. There’s often an odd hint of “aloneness” to them.
You mentioned that you found Obama “chameleon”-like.
This is common in NPD.For someone with NPD, it’s predominantly about the surface
- the image in the mirror. There’s less of a solid core. One perspective that many
psychologists subscribe to is that in NPD, the “true self” is greatly diminished or
largely absent, having largely been replaced by a “false self”. Another interesting
characteristic, in my experience, is that people with NPD often take on a stance of
amused indifference. Floating slightly above it all, sometimes with a slight bit of
contempt. You can often see Obama doing this in interviews.The entitlement aspect
comes through not only in his body language, but also in things he does and says.For
example, he was interviewed about the tactics he used to first win elected office,
as an Illinois State Senator. It was a very liberal Chicago district, so the only real
opposition was in the Democratic primary. He had four opponents, including the
incumbent (a woman named Alice Palmer - long time popular activist). Obama hired
the best lawyers in Chicago and used aggressive legal tactics to challenge the
nominating petitions of each of his opponents; knocking them all off the ballot so
that he could run unopposed (it would have been very difficult for him to win the
election if the incumbent remained on the ballot). In 2007 a reporter asked him
about this:“Asked whether the district’s primary voters were well-served by having
only one candidate, Obama smiled and said: ‘I think they ended up with a very good
state senator.’And he defended his use of ballot maneuvers: ‘If you can win, you
should win and get to work doing the people’s business.’
In my experience, people with NPD use language in a very distinctive way. I have
found the following description by Sam Vaknin to be pretty accurate (though the
description is too flowery for my taste):
“Narcissists …don’t talk, or communicate. They fend off. They hide and evade and
avoid and disguise. In their planet of capricious and arbitrary unpredictability, of
shifting semiotic and semantic dunes - they perfect the ability to say nothing in
lengthy, Castro-like speeches.
It is the fact that language is put by Narcissists to a different use - not to
communicate but to obscure, not to share but to abstain, not to learn but to
defend and resist, not to teach but to preserve ever less tenable monopolies, to
disagree without incurring wrath, to criticize without commitment, to agree
without appearing to do so. Thus, an “agreement” with a narcissist is a vague
expression of intent at a given moment - rather than the clear listing of long term,
iron-cast and mutual commitments. Communication through unequivocal,
unambiguous, information-rich symbol systems is such an integral and crucial part
of our world - that its absence is not postulated even in the remotest galaxies
which grace the skies of science fiction. In this sense, narcissists are nothing
short of aliens.
With cerebral narcissists, language is a lover. The infatuation with its very sound
leads to a pyrotechnic type of speech which sacrifices its meaning to its music. Its
speakers pay more attention to the composition than to the content. They are
swept by it, intoxicated by its perfection, inebriated by the spiraling complexity of
its forms.”

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:18 | #

Kurt,

You are spamming.  Please desist.  If you wish to offer a post to the blog do it by mailing me through the contact button under the header.  But this is not the way.

Posted by Kurt Steiner on Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:24 | #

Howdy Folks.

I have tried the Klan and the Nazis, the conservatives and the WS but I never found any clear thinking human being capable of fighting back.

I despise Jews but I am convinced that as long as “white leaders” parade Jews as the main enemy, they will always have an out, a way to avoid confrontation and polarization.
Nothing has ever been done about the Jews in American and the Klan/Nazi has been around for over 100 years. I am talking about incompetence and cowardice.

If I can find white men who are nether druggies, drunks or queers and they will join me in using our phony rights to confront and expose the evil of blacks, then I will agree to take on the Jews after the back of black racism has been broken.

Is there anybody out there who will shut up about Jews until after we defeat the blacks?
Is there anybody out there with the cajonies and fanatic determination to do that?
Is there anybody out there who will particpate in constant searches for informants and agent provocateurs among white activists?
Is there anyone with the guts to join me in taking on the blacks racist “peace” criminals?

If there is, I guarantee that we will run up against their Jew handlers too.

The erntire Weatherman teerrorist organizatipon is Jewish and is advising Obama, for example.

All right then

Attention.
Head out of Ass
Forward, march.

(Im looking back)

“Wait don’t run away. Don’t be scared.”

Kurt

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 02 Aug 2011 02:37 | #

This post rose to the surface due to a scumbag spam comment (now deleted) . However it reminded me about Steven Palesi. Its an ill wind and all that…

What happened to Steven Palesi? He seemed a bright guy.