Posted by Steve Edwards on Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:48 | #

I had a shot at this myself:

http://ravingwingnut.blogspot.com/2006/07/yet-more-anti-white-racism.html

Say - anyone found out the ethnicities of the judges who decided on this trial?

Posted by On Holliday on Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:59 | #

Good points, both James and Steve in your own blog post.

Of course, the argument that whites should have less rights than minorities because whites “have the power” and minorities do not is internally inconsistent.

If whites “had the power” then they would not allow themselves to be discriminated against with respect to school admissions, hiring, immigration and, now it seems, the Bill of Rights.

The same argument holds with respect to the assertion that group activism is illegitimate for whites, and legitimate for non-whites, because “whites have the power.”

Again: if a group in society is predominant with respect to political and social power (here I am talking about having the group get its way with respect to its interests, *not* that aracial individualists of the group in question hold political office, etc.), then how is it possible that the entire establishment - ostensibly controlled by this group and “serving” (according to the PC spiel) the “racist” interests of that group - discriminates against the group?

If whites really “had the power” then, at the very least, whites would have the same rights as others to group-organize and to express controversial opinions - if not *more* rights to do so.

This is really strange manifestation of group power in that the so-called powerful group:
a) has de facto and sometimes de jure socipolitical sanctions against the same types of group activism practiced by the so-called repressed minorities
b) is officially and legally discriminated against in the most basic social fuctions: schools, jobs, migration
c) and is now discriminated against in not having the same free speech rights as other groups

whew!  Lucky whites have the power - imagine if we didn’t!

But, what use this power if it doesn’t translate into practical sociopolitical utility?  Doesn’t power imply that your interests are being served?  And, if so, doesn’t it suggest that whites have, at least per capita, *less* power than any other group?

What the reality actually is, is that it are the white *elites* - who have no loyalty at all to their race and make common cause with other groups to pursue individualist interests - who have “the power”, along with both overclass and underclass minority groups.

The white masses are, as James would put it, ethnically disenfranchised.

No matter what “spin” the racial left tries to put on this, it is quite clear throughout history that a socially dominant group should more rights than other groups, not *less.*

It is precisely because white elites have abandoned the white masses - and the white masses are too stupid and indoctrinated to realize this in any coherent way - is why the so-called “dominant minority” is discriminated against in favor or “powerless minorities”, an absurdity unprecedented in history.

Or, is it that whites are being “paid back” or *past* power - with the implication that whites are no longer privelaged (which goes against of course the thesis of *current* “white skin privelage and “institutional racism”) and that it is a reasonable legal doctrine to punish present and future generations for the “sins” of their ancestors.

Of course, said “sins” are merely having the temerity for having their own posterity enjoy the fruits of a civilization and society built by whites - an attitude considered normal when expressed by all other peoples.

The key here then is the betrayal of whites by their elites, and the oxymoronic statement that whites cannot have the same rights as others because whites have the power in the society that discriminates against them.

Posted by Nick Tamiroff on Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:06 | #

I can’t recall the last time this Clinton appointed dick-head DIDN’T get overturned on appeal.The 9th Circuit Court is a joke-their wearing the black robes are more suitable for “trick or treating"on Halloween.Lawyers just love him;it keeps the money rolling in.

Posted by James Bowery on Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:22 | #

Addendum:

Judge Reinhardt’s father was a film director, his mother a screen writer and his wife the executive director of the ACLU of Southern California—all Jewish.

Posted by Stanley Womack on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:09 | #

Market Dominant Minorities

A useful tool in understanding how members of a particular ethnic group may rise to dominating positions in one or another profession or occupation may be found in some conceptual work by Professor Amy Chua in her book “World on Fire” which spells out how democracy may conflict with market globalization and ethnic diversity.

If we switch the issue to “Government & Media Dominant Minorities” and apply the same reasoning to government and media that the professor applies to markets, we may get new insights and new ways to discuss the situation.

We have a short essay about it at:

http://www.resistingdefamation.org/sub/g21.htm

Posted by Luke on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:54 | #

Excellent analysis, On Holliday.  The inconsistancies and contradictions you point out are glaringly obvious when you think about it, but no one ever does.  Again, very well put.

Posted by C. Rosemond on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:51 | #

Ditto, Nick Tamiroff.  The 9th Circuit has been the most consistently overturned federal court in the country at SCOTUS during the Rehnquist era.  It is likely to continue to be so with the Roberts bench.

Posted by On Holliday on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:58 | #

James, look at this:
http://moderntribalist.blogspot.com/2006/07/men-and-boys-with-autism-have-fewer.html#links

Note the possibility that the neuronal loss occurs “later in life”; that is, after birth.

This is consistent with the theory that exposure to South Asian phenotypes may damage the development of the amygdala in susceptible white (male) children.

Until more data is accumulated, it is probably safe for white families, especially those with boys, to practice social ostracism of South Asians.

Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:34 | #

Well, even so, prenatal environmental influences are important to consider.  The neuronal loss may be a latter-stage development. 

What I want to see is more action on the legal front to force the multinationals to have to acquire legal insurance against the possibility that their choice of immigrants is damaging the community.  Simple crime insurance would be a good start:  If you hire a “guest” worker, you are responsible for compensating those victimized by the worker.  Then it is more obvious that if you bring in a worker that causes health damage, you are liable for that damage.  And I think this liability should extend for the entire duration of the “guest”‘s stay whether you still have him employed or not.  In other words, if you bring some “temporary” worker is who you assist in becoming permanent, the damage caused by his extended stay is on your shoulders.

Posted by On Holliday on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:53 | #

Good point.  Companies that hire immigrants are privatizing the profits while socializing the costs.  They need be forced to accept some of the burdens that their choices impose on the community.

Where’s the legal team willing to push this concept?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:42 | #

“The 9th Circuit has been the most consistently overturned federal court in the country at SCOTUS during the Rehnquist era.  It is likely to continue to be so with the Roberts bench.”  (—C. Rosemond)

Judges who are frequently overturned pay no penalty?  There’s no system of warnings, reprimands, or removals from the bench? 

Let’s see this Jewish nation-destroying judge and his Jewish nation-destroying ACLU-activist wife be deported to Israel and try some of their nation-destroying techniques over there, turned against Israel (instead of against the United States).  Let’s see how long they’d last.

Posted by James Bowery on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:59 | #

Fred, your comment illustrates why I am not an anti-Zionist and indeed hope Israel survives the USrael excesses.

Yes, they should be deported to Israel along with all members of Jewish organizations, and the real US, the “posterity” of the founders, should not take sides in the conflicts in the middle east.  We’re over our heads there.

Posted by Steve Edwards on Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:01 | #

“Judge Reinhardt’s father was a film director…”

I didn’t read any further, because I didn’t have to.

Look - I’m probably the most aracial individual on this forum, who usually steers clear of these kinds of issues - it’s a bad habit, I suppose, not confronting EVERYTHING head on, and probably a hangover from my younger “progressive” days - but I just want to say this (and hear me out):

The madness has got to stop. Everyone’s sick of it. And we have a pretty good idea that Jewish organisations are the primary supporters of the entire racket (indeed, I am open to the argument that while their support may not be a sufficient factor in keeping it alive, but nevertheless is undoubtedly a necessary factor). Why do they keep doing it? WHY?

Can it please stop, for f——sake? I mean, I don’t demand that Israelis give up their freedoms and open their borders, so why do Jews do so in the West? And the horrible fact is…they actually do this - completely openly, without shame.

I have an impeccable record on race-replacement: I (and I think I speak for most people here) consistently oppose race-replacement everywhere in the world it is ever attempted - Kosovo, South Sudan, the West Bank, Israel proper, Russia, Japan, China, South Africa…you name it - if the race-replacers have any of these people in their targets, then I’m gonna have some words about that.

But all I ask is for just a little reciprocity. No, I don’t expect non-Europeans to actually shill for the interests of Europeans, and would never ask for as much - all that is required is an understanding that government-enforced race-replacement is just not on, wherever it might happen, and ending it (and reversing it) is a completely normal thing to aspire to. Is that too much to ask?

Posted by Steven Palese on Sat, 22 Jul 2006 05:14 | #

Hello folks, I’ve been busy lately but this news item is simply too obscene not to comment on.

This is what our tolerance toward anti-white racism is leading to. look at the statement again:

Judge Reinhardt wrote that a different standard should apply to derogatory remarks aimed at “majority groups such as Christians or whites” because “there is, of course, a difference between a historically(A) oppressed(B) minority(C) group that has been the victim of serious prejudice and discrimination and a group that has always enjoyed a preferred social, economic and political status.”

Notice the A, B, and C notes I added? Those are the racial theories that power and sustain the anti-white regime, specifically:

(A) The Unique History of White Evil Theory

This racial theory holds that “whites cannot evade history”. It is a racial theory because it justifies discrimination against a group based on their (Euro-Christian) ancestry alone irrespective of actual participation or consent (in slavery, holocaust, etc.) and therefore denies innocence as a defense.

(B) The Unearned White Skin-color Privilege Theory

This racial theory holds that “whites cannot evade responsibility”. It is a racial theory because it justifies discrimination against individuals based on their (Euro-Christian) ancestry alone irrespective of actual status or financial condition and therefore denies innocence as a defense.

(C) The White Majority Deference Theory

This racial theory holds that “majorities must serve minorities unless the minority is white”. It is a racial theory because its discriminatory logic applies exclusively to whites. For example, suggesting the reverse, that white minorities in South Africa or Detroit should have not equal but superior rights is widely considered insane.

These three theories form the regime’s hegemonic ideology, a key concept I brought up earlier in this thread. If we destroy these racial theories we cripple the anti-white regime that is waging war on us.

An anti-racism approach that focuses on these three theories is the only way out.

Tomorrow I’ll post my responses to Daedalus in our ongoing Jewish Question debate at the phora and get back into the anti-racism struggle against these three racial theories. I’ll update my blog and post here the latest version of the leaflet that kills theory B.

The leaflet is much improved and quite radical in some respects - I might piss off some traditionalists because I’m now referring to the Judeo-fascist regime as “the Cryptarchy”, Jews as “first class whites” and to us as “second class whites”. The term “ZioNazi pigs” has also made an appearance.

Anyway, you’ll see it tomorrow and I hope I get plenty of constuctive feedback as I did last time. Rusty and Zach will see that their input has been taken onboard in its entirety.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 22 Jul 2006 07:38 | #

This decision was nothing but a Jewish ethnic attack on an ethnicity many if not most Jews consider their enemy.  That’s it.  Nothing else.  It had nothing to do with principle whatsoever.  “Principle” in the case of decisions like this comes purely as a rationalisation after the issue has been decided in such a way as attacks/weakens/punishes the ethnic enemy—for no reason other than that he is the ethnic enemy.

Jews need to look squarely and honestly at the pure ethnic warfare many of their brethren are waging against whites, Europeans, Christians, and the West purely on grounds that they perceive them to be the ethnic enemy and intend to use what power and influence they have to bring them down. 

All questions of principle in cases such as this are nothing but a flimsy rationalisation after the fact. 

And white European Christians are getting sick of it, of this stuff coming from the Jews.  Let the Jews start hearing that, in plain language.  We’re sick of constantly being attacked by them in these highly-destructive, devious ways.

I call upon the Jews( * ) to stop what amount to naked ethnic attacks on Europeans flimsily disguised as principled legal decisions.  They’re not principled legal decisions, not a single one of them.
______

( *  I call upon them as Jews, not as liberals:  diaspora-Jewish liberalism is to a large extent simply a form of diaspora-Jewish nationalism, its purpose being to attack the “national enemy,” strengthening the Jews as a group by weakening their enemy as a group.)

Posted by Ben Tillman on Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:41 | #

Good point, Alex.

Posted by ben tillman on Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:45 | #

Of course, the argument that whites should have less rights than minorities because whites “have the power” and minorities do not is internally inconsistent.

If whites “had the power” then they would not allow themselves to be discriminated against with respect to school admissions, hiring, immigration and, now it seems, the Bill of Rights.

This cannot be repeated often enough. 

By the way, will Salter ever publish his “Ethnic Infrastructures” ?

Posted by Steven Palese on Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:19 | #

This is the latest version of the leaflet.

It is designed to destroy the odious Unearned White Skin-color Privilege theory this disgusting court decision is using to justify its anti-white racism

This version incorporates all comments made up to this point - I’m also including a pdf link for those wanting to get going and dive into battle. The final link currently points to my blog but if you want a custom version just say so on this thread and I’ll make you one with your link.

I can also modify the terminology any way you want - I realize the 1st class white / 2nd class white terminology is very radical and may not suit everyone. I know puritans will spazz out at my suggestion that Jews are white - but if you pay attention you’ll notice I’m opening a chasm between our two groups that ordinary folk can understand and relate to.

Leaflet images followed by pdf links - text in next post

Download pdf file - mirror 1

Download pdf file - mirror 2

Download pdf file - mirror 3

Let me know what you think and whether it can be improved in any way. Bear in mind that I have no space left so additions will require subtractions.

Posted by Steven Palese on Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:22 | #

WAKE UP AND SMELL THE CRYPTARCHY

Our democracy has withered down to a vote between Zionist warmonger A and Zionist warmonger B:

The Bush-Kerry presidential debate:

George W. Bush: “A free Iraq will be an ally in the war on terror, and that’s essential. A free Iraq will set a powerful example in the part of the world that is desperate for freedom. A free Iraq will help secure Israel. A free Iraq will enforce the hopes and aspirations of the reformers in places like Iran. A free Iraq is essential for the security of this country.”

John Kerry: “Soldiers know over there that this isn’t being done right yet. I’m going to get it right for those soldiers, because it’s important to Israel, it’s important to America, it’s important to the world, it’s important to the fight on terror.”

This is in turn driven by media control, a fact that single handedly redefines America as a covert fascist regime, or Cryptarchy. Media control and democracy cannot co-exist under any circumstances:

“Four of the largest five entertainment giants are now run or owned by [1st class whites]. Murdoch’s News Corp (at number four) is the only gentile holdout—however Rupert is as pro-Israel as any [1st class white], probably more so.”
Los Angeles Jewish Times, ‘Yes, Virginia, [1st class whites] Do Control the Media,’ Oct. 29-Nov. 11, 1999 p. 14

“Time-Warner, Disney, Viacom-CBS, News Corporation and Universal rule the entertainment world in a way that the old Hollywood studio chiefs only dreamed of. And, after all the deals and buyouts, four of the five are run by [1st class whites]. We’re back to where we started, bigger than ever.”
Jewish Week, 9-17-99, 12

“The greatest concentration of [1st class whites], however, is at the producer level—and it is the producers who decide which stories will go on the air, and how long, and in what order, they will run. In 1982, before a shift in assignments, the executive producers of all three evening newscasts were [1st class whites], as were the executive producers of CBS’s 60 Minutes and ABC’s 20/20. And [1st class whites] are almost equally prominent at the ‘senior producer’ and ‘broadcast producer’ levels as well as in senior management. When Reuven Frank stepped down as president of NBC News in 1984, for example, he was replaced by Laurence Grossman, who left the presidency of PBS to take the position.”
Charles Silberman, A Certain People. American [1st class whites] and Their Lives Today, Summit Books, 1985, p. 154

The Cryptarchy is not a recent development. The hidden ruling elite has been intimidating sitting presidents into behaving like frightened children for some time:

[U.S. President Richard] Nixon cites Paul Keyes, a political conservative who is executive producer of the NBC hit, “Rowan and Martin’s Laugh-In,” as telling him that “11 of the 12 writers are [1st class whites].” “That right?” says Billy Graham, America’s best known preacher of the time, prompting Nixon to claim that Life magazine, Newsweek, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and others, are “totally dominated by [1st class whites].” Nixon says network TV anchors Howard K. Smith, David Brinkley and Walter Cronkite “front men who may not be of that persuasion,” but that their writers are “95 percent [1st class whites].”

“This stranglehold has got to be broken or the country’s going down the drain,” the nation’s best-known preacher declares “You believe that?” Nixon says. “Yes, sir,” Graham says. “Oh, boy,” replies Nixon. “So do I. I can’t ever say that but I believe it.” Nixon-Graham tapes - 1972. (http://www.counterpunch.org/alexgraham.htm ).

The Cryptarchy affects [2nd class whites] in many other ways, including personally. Our children are worth less than a third of a person while our [1st class white] elite, the two percent that eat half the pie, are forty times more privileged:

According to the Nov. 16, 1998 Wall Street Journal, Harvard’s student body is 33% [1st class white] and 25% [2nd class white]. Moreover this pattern repeats throughout the Ivy League, the gatekeepers for access to the US ruling elite. (http://www.buchanan.org/pa-98-1127.html).

Given that [2nd class whites] (people born with Euro-Christian ancestry) account for 75% of the US population whereas [1st class whites] (people born with Judeo-semitic ancestry) account for 2.5%, we can deduce the following three facts:
Fact one. In terms of access to the elite, being born [1st class white] makes you thirteen times more privileged than average. (The level of [1st class white] over representation is calculated by dividing the Harvard percentage of 33 by the U.S. population percentage of 2.5 which yields 13.2)

Fact two. In terms of access to the elite, being born [2nd class white] makes you worth less than a third of a person. (The level of [2nd class white] under representation is calculated by dividing the Harvard percentage of 25 by the U.S. population percentage of 75 which yields 0.33)

Fact three. In terms of access to the elite, [1st class whites] are forty times more privileged than [2nd class whites]. (The ethnic privilege differential between the groups is calculated by dividing the [1st class white] over representation of 13.2 by the [2nd class white] under representation of 0.33 which yields 40)

This pattern of massive [1st class white] over representation repeats throughout the Ivy League and has little to do with hard work or merit. In the few remaining elite colleges where admission is purely SAT based and therefore meritocratic, [1st class white] representation peaks at a more honest five percent. As for example at CalTech, the college with the highest SAT scores (both math and verbal) and the smartest students in America. (http://home.ddc.net/ygg/ms/ms-45.htm ).

[1st class whites] achieve their extraordinary over representation only where the admissions process allows for racial favoritism and ethnic lobbying, a privilege [2nd class whites] are denied so as to insure [1st class whites] avoid having to compete on equal terms. If the playing field were level, [1st class whites] would not be as privileged.

The Cryptarchy is founded and sustained on the dual persecution of [2nd class whites]:

According to The [1st class white] Phenomenon: Seven Keys to the Enduring Wealth of a People by Steven Silbiger and [1st class white] Power: Inside the American [1st class white] Establishment by J.J. Goldberg (currently the editor of the influential [1st class white] community weekly Forward), [1st class whites] account for 33% of millionaires, 45% of billionaires, 50% of Wall Street executives and so on thanks to their formidable ethnic solidarity.

This “formidable ethnic solidarity”, i.e. racial favoritism toward other [1st class whites], is only one part of the [1st class white] success formula; the other part is preventing [2nd class whites] from doing the same thing in order to avoid having to compete on equal terms.

The Walt and Mearsheimer report on the Israel Lobby documents the methods used by [1st class white] groups to persecute their opponents, including blacklists and co-ordinated campaigns of intimidation designed to destroy careers and reputations. (http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP06-011 ). There are over 300 national [1st class white] organizations and 4000 foundations with a combined annual budget of $6 billion that form part of this co-ordinated network of persecution. (http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html ).

The publications of [1st class white] organizations proudly claim credit for their leading roles in the witch hunts against [2nd class white] solidarity activists and their websites proudly display the trophy scalps of dead [2nd class white] rights organizations. (http://www.adl.org ). For example, recently an assistant district attorney expressed concern that [2nd class white] people were becoming an endangered species. In response, [1st class white] organizations immediately incited a “racism” witch hunt against him. He was fired the very next day. (“Prosecutor fired amid racism claims,” Associated Press, March 3, 2006.)

For detailed case studies see: Favoritism for Them, Persecution for Us - How Two Percent Eat Half the Pie by Dennis Pasquino. One of many case studies describes the Wall Street racial favoritism behind Michael Eisner’s appointment as CEO of the Disney media conglomerate, how he replaced senior management with fellow [1st class whites] within months and how his victims were paralyzed into silence for fear of “anti-Semitism” witch hunts against themselves and their families. Of course, if [2nd class white] executives engaged in similar racial favoritism toward fellow [2nd class whites] they’d be persecuted for “racism”. As media critic Michael Medved has pointed out, “The famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-semitic attitudes, now features [1st class white] personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions.” (”[1st class whites] Run Hollywood. So What?,” Moment magazine, August 1996.)

[1st class white] hyper-competitiveness is entirely based on this dual persecution strategy of a) inciting witch hunts against [2nd class whites] who object to [1st class white] racial favoritism toward their kindred (persecutions for “anti-Semitism”) and b) inciting witch hunts against [2nd class whites] who get uppity and think they too can engage in racial favoritism toward their kindred (persecutions for “racism”). If the playing field were level, [1st class whites] would not be hyper-competitive.

The dual persecution strategy is how [1st class white] organizations pay back [2nd class whites] for dying all over Europe to rescue them from Hitler. Talk about setting new standards for shameless ingratitude. This behavior is a disgrace to America, to our veterans, to non-racist [1st class whites] and
to anyone with a shred of decency.

continued in next post..

Posted by Steven Palese on Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:23 | #

Leaflet text continued..

The Cryptarchy, aided and abetted by its regime uncle toms, imposes mass immigration against the democratic will:

A recent opinion poll shows that while almost 80% of the public is against mass immigration and 60% consider it a critical threat, only 14% of the opinion elite (members of Congress, the administration, leaders of church groups, business executives, union leaders, journalists, academics, and heads of major interest groups) share the public’s concern. (http://www.vdare.com/roberts/immigration_dictatorship.htm).

An elite-public disparity of this magnitude is typical of racial-supremacist systems. In apartheid South Africa, for example, black uncle toms could access the elite, provided they supported white interests and opposed black interests. Similarly, in the U.S., [2nd class white] uncle toms can access the elite, provided they support [1st class white] group interests and oppose [2nd class white] group interests. (All [2nd class white] uncle toms favor imposing mass immigration against the democratic will of the majority because all major [1st class white] organizations do and therefore going along earns them a pat on the head - see http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html ).

PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE FREELY

Everyone on campus has group representation except for ordinary whites. The campus administration continues to deny whites a student union on the grounds that, in U.S. society, whites are “in power”, “privileged” and “the oppressors”.

This racial theory is known as the Unearned White Skin-color Privilege theory. It is a racial theory because it justifies discrimination against individuals based on their (Euro-Christian) ancestry alone irrespective of actual status or financial condition and therefore denies innocence as a defense.

We ask that either all groups be allowed group representation or none. As long as this equal rights demand is denied, volunteers will continue to distribute this leaflet. This leaflet is designed to refute the racial theory on which this denial is based. Ordinary whites are not “in power”, not “privileged” and not in a position to be “the oppressors”, Jews are. This doesn’t mean Jews (first class whites) should take the heat from this racial theory instead. It means the campus administration must stop relying on racism.

To volunteer to join our campaign for equal rights and defeat the racial theories peddled by the campus administration, please visit our website. (We welcome non-racist Jews who oppose the dual persecution strategy against ordinary whites; Jews who support it are ZioNazi pigs whose pro-semitic bigotry won’t be tolerated).

http://turning.r8.org/

Ok I’ll now withdraw to my blog and update it so that it’s coherent with this leaflet - I’m somewhat ahead of it

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:02 | #

Steven, I think it’s quite good.  There are details I wouldn’t have put in or would have said differently or which I frankly disagree with, but they’re not important.  The important things are the general drift of the leaflet and its function as a counterattack.  It should go forward if it can have an effect.  If it does have an effect, more such leaflets should go forward.  We’re in a war, one in which, we all know, the other side, including the Jews, don’t fight fairly so let’s not be too finicky about this or that detail where a project succeeds in having its hoped-for effect.  Among those on the other side, the Jews in particular have used the dirtiest fighting methods imaginable and continue to do so—to take just one example out of hundreds, look at their invention of the “there are no such things as races” outrage over a century ago, and their using all the means at their disposal to push it on academia and the public.  They know perfectly it’s a lie:  Stephen Jay Gould, Ashley Montague, and all the others knew perfectly it was a lie, but their goal of attacking the European races and ethnocultures using that lie as a weapon took precedence over scruple.  When you’re fighting a totally unscrupulous adversary, you needn’t scruple too much over details.

Posted by Steven Palese on Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:31 | #

Zach, the first class/second class dichotomy is now being emphasized as a consequence of three factors:

One. Your post,

Focus on elite status; focus on your “first class white”, “second class white” dichotomy. Focus on the obvious “white skin privileged” that a certain group enjoys, regardless of label. Focus on the third of a person/40 times more privileged point. All of this is very good and original. It will force many people to think outside of their normal bounds. Just don’t make people stop reading before they get to the solid points.

Two. Wintermute’s fnord observation. While the fnord argument may appear ridiculous on first reading, it’s actually very insightful and reflects your views as well. Read it yourself here. Then read it again. And one more time.

That’s why I’ve essentially purged all occurences of the word “Jew” all the way down to the last few lines. I haven’t kept the matter secret, I’ve just avoided the kill-trigger word, or fnord.

In those last few lines, I formally let the cat out of the bag then chase it with anti-racism sweeteners and a non-racist Jew / ZioNazi pig dichotomy,

We welcome non-racist Jews who oppose the dual persecution strategy against ordinary whites; Jews who support it are ZioNazi pigs whose pro-semitic bigotry won’t be tolerated

It’s not even a fig leaf - I actually mean it. The problem lies in finding these non-racist Jews who oppose the dual persecution strategy and, by extension, the unearned privilege it bestows them. Israel Shamir is the only one I know of that meets the criteria.

Notice also how that one line neutralizes their “racism”, “Nazi” and “anti-semitism” attack lines and converts them into verbal weapons for our team, i.e. “racist Jews”, “ZioNazi pigs” and “pro-semitic bigotry”.

Three. It dawned on me that if we succeed, our first white student union will be flooded by panicked Jewish applicants out to insure there’s no unsupervised whites organizing and getting ideas - that’s a privilege reserved for them and their tools, not for us morally inferior honkies.

The first class/second class dichotomy is the only way I can think of to either get them to back off or to continue the fight inside the student union by creating a second class white caucus within it.

If we argue they already have a Jewish student union, they’ll say we should set up a Christian one (we don’t have that either). If we argue they’re not white, we get bogged down in DNA and/or ethnicity arguments that are too complex for students to handle effectively.

I think this approach is the only way it’s going to work. We therefore have to be forward about it by plastering the concept on our leaflets from day one.

Think of it as a wrestling manouvre. Instead of pushing them away as non-whites, we embrace them and crush them against our chest.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:30 | #

Once again, Steven Palese:  I like the way you think.

Posted by near the end on Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:02 | #

As a young white male I must say I am losing faith in our nation and our way of living, I have been struggling with race issues my whole life. However only recently it has become almost unbearable. All around me, my family, friends, people I see and meet in daily life, they all seem like sheep. Castrated, impotent, unable to stand up for their own people. Some of them dont even consider the continued survival of “caucasians”, as a viable option. It simply appears to me that there is a dangerous, (very dangerous)amount of apathy, self hatred, cowardice, and indifferance amoung white people today. White men are taught to be tolerant, respectful, and non-judgemental by a large number of white parents from an early age. Of course this would seem to be the right choice for parents when dealing with teaching their children about race and how to get along with other groups of people. However in my humble opinion this only causes racism in the long run, not only amoung white males, but white females, blacks, latinos, etc. etc.
  I will explain, please stick with me. Example: a white couple raises thier son to be all of the above traits previously mentioned, a black couple (having their own experiances and beliefs raises their son to be aggressive, hard working, proud and at the same time respectfull as long as it is earned by the other person.) Using common sense and logic, who is going to come out on top in any form of competition or confrontation? In my opinion based on my own experiance as well as the shared experiances of others like myself, the victor will always be the man who has respect for himself, his people, his own personal past and the past of his people. My basic point is you dont have to cut off the balls of your young men in order to teach them respect for other groups of people. A little too exteme for you? Im exaggerating you say? Be honest with yourself, what do you see in your daily lives? I see white men unable to speak out against blatent racism directed towards them, I see a growing militancy amoung other groups of people who sense weakness and rightly so. It seems as though previous white generations who helped (as well as fought against) racism grow, are now allowing, if not outright cheering the demonization of their own.
  In my opinion previous generations not only failed us when they instigated such extreme racial hatred against us, they seem now to be complient in our slow painful destruction. It is indeed a painful death we are facing. White males raised to love diversity, equality, and other virtues, are now forced to watch as these same beliefs are crushed by condoned racial hatred.
“en masse” white women seem to give favoritism towards darker skinned males, in my opinion and in the eyes of many others. They have been taught for decades that their own inflicted grievous atrocities on other groups. In school I watched as overweight white female teachers with short haircuts(and tempers towards any aggressive white male students) chastised their own, encourageing this attitude amoung white females. Look at popular culture today. White males adopt the aggressive black male persona everywhere, why? Because it is socially unacceptable for a white male to be aggressive unless he has this persona attached. Case in point, I am driving two young attactive well spoken white women in my cab one night, they see a young white man drive by in a lifted, loud powerful truck. They proceeded to make snide and cruel comments. A few moments later a fast car with rims and tinted windows went “booming” by. Their responses to this was positive and affirming.
  In truth all races of people have been victimized at some point and no race is as guilty or more guilty then any other race. People are quick to remember slavery in this country, but try to find two people who know about the moorish invasion of visigoth held spain. I wonder quite a bit about how many young white men have given up the dream, Martin Luther Kings dream, and have subscribed to another mans dream, who shall remain unnamed but not unimagined. I wonder how much evil has been instigated by white girls eager to date outside their own race, either because it is the trendy thing to do or because they want to hurt a racist lover who has scorned them. My own experiances teach me that we cant make generalizations about groups of people yet it is hard not to do so when your own suspicions about certain groups of people are proven time and time again. I lust for a world where all gorups can feel pride in who they are without seeking or praying for the destruction of others. Yet, more and more I see this nation and all other nations heading towards global race war. Only through TRUTH and understanding can we avoid this.
  I still hold the dream Martin.