The Headhunter, a nationalist novel ... Review Call

Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 22 May 2011 17:35.

I received an email yesterday informing me that Michael Whitehouse, author of a fast-paced new novel about a prolonged and deadly-violent attack on the British Establishment by a terrorist cell of nationalist persuasion, has placed the opening three chapters on-line for your perusal.  You can view them here.

By way of a taster, this is the style of the writing:

The day before Belinda Smalls’ head was discovered at Stonehenge, along with those of Michael Cohen, Muhammad Aziz and Annabelle Armour, most of those ‘in the know’ were still concentrating on Islamic ‘hate-preachers’ and their adherents. The day after the heads were found, the brightest and the best were beginning to think the bad guys were out to destroy the politically correct consensus that had governed the western world for the previous half century. At that point, the establishment, with some relish, began rounding up the most outspoken members of the Nationalist community and clamping down on the rest.
A good few entirely innocent people had by now endured six whole weeks of incarceration and aggressive interrogation at the hands of the authorities. Two of these had had a heart attack and one elderly lady, who had suffered a stroke during a particularly intensive and unrelenting question and answer session, had died.
At first, when it was thought that Islamists were responsible, the majority was content to have the cops and the army interfere with the ordinary progress of their lives. But, as time wore on, the populace began to wonder at all the fuss. Along the way, it had been noted by most that the ordinary citizen did not seem to be at any risk from the killers. The huge level of disruptive and increasingly belligerent security was, as a result, beginning to grate upon those who had to endure it. ‘For the protection of the public’ didn’t wash any longer. Whoever was responsible had no interest in blowing up buses, trains, buildings or innocent people. Corrupt politicians, politically correct zealots and media commentators who patently despised the ‘British dinosaur’ had been selectively done away with. In the minds of an increasingly sizeable minority, such individuals, and the agenda they had for so long embraced and aggressively espoused, rendered them worthy of the fate that had befallen them.
By the time the Stonehenge heads were discovered it wasn’t just the British Nationalist who was chalking off the kills and sniggering. The natives were growing restless and, behind the scenes, the masters of the universe were getting worried.


The first Prime Minister’s Questions after the escape had been the worst he had ever had to face and he desperately needed something positive to report. He didn’t understand how, with all the modern surveillance, all the satellites in space and all the computer systems in place to keep track of just about everybody on the planet, this man had managed to kill so many people without being caught. They knew who he was. They knew everything about him, for goodness sake! And still the police had no idea where he might be!
The streets were full of cops and, with great reluctance, he’d given the order for the army to make its presence felt discreetly wherever it was thought racial tensions might be about to flare up. The press, the opposition and the civil liberties crowd were having a field day but it couldn’t be helped. This Blueprint business had everyone’s nerves on edge. He looked at his watch. In less than two hours his accusers would nail his balls to the carpet all over again.
Alan was nervous. He was due any minute and he had nothing more to tell him. He had a country to run, didn’t they know that? For God’s sake, he had to prepare for PMQs and yet, here he was, wasting his time with this nonsense! His secretary knocked on the door and quietly let him know that they had arrived.
“Show them in please, Annabelle,” he said, a little too loudly. He stood up when they entered and moved to greet them. They shook hands and both sat down before Alan invited them to do so. The Baron got straight to the point.
“What news on our man, Alan?” he asked.
“He’s gone to ground, I’m afraid,” he replied. “The police don’t seem to have much of a clue as yet.”
“Has anyone been sacked yet for letting him get away?” growled Jacob Ratner. Masking the irritation he felt, Alan told him that he hadn’t felt the need to fire anyone as the man in charge of the operation had lost his life during the course of it.
“No great loss,” opined Ratner. “I’m all for employing faggots in the entertainment industry but I wouldn’t have one as top cop.”
Alan pushed a copy of The Blueprint towards the Baron. He hoped that, in giving him access to such sensitive material, it might temper any annoyance he might feel at the lack of progress. He leafed through a few pages before putting it to one side.
“Yes,” he said, “I’ve been wanting to talk to you about this. I must say I’m surprised you didn’t see fit to bring it to our attention before now.” Alan was horrified.
“You’ve already seen it?” The Baron smiled.
“Of course. Did you imagine that you could keep us out of the loop, Alan?” The Prime Minister was dumbstruck and did not reply. “Knowledge, particularly that which is not generally known, is our business. It has been for thousands of years. We certainly know as much about this matter as you do and, probably, rather more.”
“Well, perhaps you could fill me in then, seeing as you know so much.”
“There’s no need to be snide,” replied the Baron. “Information keeps us ahead of the game, that’s all.”
“And as you know,” added Ratner, looking the Prime Minister straight in the eye, “we do need to be ahead of the game. History tells us that, if we take our eyes off the ball for one moment, Jews die.” Alan didn’t like the squat, little boss of the Secure Communities Council. He could stare a goat to death with those dead, black, Ronnie Kray eyes.
“So what are your plans? Please do not keep anything from me.” The Baron’s even gaze was, if anything, more unsettling than Ratner’s cut-your-throat-for-a-fiver glare.
“I have a man in place,” Alan heard himself say. He had no idea why he had said it but he was clutching at straws now. “Yes. There’s this policeman, not at all like your run-of-the-mill type, he’s got some interesting ideas. He’s fairly sure our man will visit his mother’s grave on her birthday, for example. He thinks he won’t be able to stay away.” Ratner and the Baron exchanged disbelieving looks.
“Oh right. The serial killer who loved his mum,” He laughed contemptuously. “Sounds like a Janet and John book to me.”
“Well, Mr Mohammed believes it might be an avenue worth pursuing.”
“Mohammed? As in the prophet?” Ratner and the Baron exchanged another look. “Let me get this straight. You’ve got some Paki on the job who isn’t much like a cop. And he’s of the opinion that the bogeyman loves his mum so much he’s going make himself available on her birthday? And when is this birthday? This time next year?”
“No, it’s next month, actually. Can’t do any harm to post a guard there, can it?”
“Post a guard? And they’ll all be standing around the grave doing Mr Plod impressions, I suppose?”
“They would be out of sight,” replied the Prime Minister, testily. “In hiding. In disguise or whatever. And please don’t speak to me in this way. I am the Prime Minister after all.” Ratner burst out laughing again.
“Do you forget how you came to be Prime Minister, Alan?” asked the Baron quietly. “Surely you know who the Kingmakers are?” The Prime Minister felt weak and trapped and didn’t reply. “This man must be stopped and quickly. He slaughters the country’s finest with impunity and tells too many tales.” The Baron rose from his seat. “Remember, you must keep us informed.” He fingered the manuscript. “This is a blueprint for revolution. I do hope you are taking it seriously. If you don’t, I can assure you that there are others who will. Meanwhile, we shall be following our own lines of inquiry.”
Ratner, who had once been done for a top-of-line fraud and had served a year in an open prison, as well as having to cough up £5,000,000 in fines, smiled nastily.
“We’ll get him for you, bubala. We’ll hand his prick to you on a fucking plate. You can bank on it.”
He wiped the sweat off his upper lip with a sleeve. Once again, they hadn’t bothered to shake his hand on the way out. For which small mercy he was grateful.

The Headhunter is available as an e-book from Amazon.

REVIEW CALL

Michael White, the author, has supplied me with a complete copy of The Headhunter for any MR regular who is interested in writing a review for the blog.  As usual, this will be offered on a first come first served basis.  I just need a real email address.

Tags: Books



Comments:


1

Posted by PM on Sun, 22 May 2011 21:05 | #

Interesting to watch Louis Theroux in an American prison tonight, and see a liberal mind sailing dangerously close to being forced to confront racial reality. He should stick to watchng Hollywood films about them in future. No redemptive nig-nogs of contrived plotlines to give the right messages here…

If you didn’t see it, it is worth watching on the BBC Iplayer. I’m sure many here will also be able to see the uncomfortable thoughts starting to cloud around the edges of his mind; the obvious questions going unasked yet still being answered.


2

Posted by Anders on Sun, 22 May 2011 21:26 | #

Very interesting. I’ve been thinking recently about what the effects of a terrorist group dedicated to opposing the European genocide would be. In this speech from the 70s, Enoch Powell seems to eerily anticipate the effects of Mohammedan terrorism. Perhaps pro-European terrorism would produce the same results?

“The experience of the last decade and more, all round the world, shows that acts of violence, however apparently irrational or inappropriate their targets, precipitate a frenzied search on the part of the society attacked to discover and remedy more and more grievances, real or imaginary, among those from whom the violence is supposed to emanate or on whose behalf it is supposed to be exercised. Those commanding a position of political leverage would then be superhuman if they could refrain from pointing to the acts of terrorism and, while condemning them, declaring that further and faster concessions and grants of privilege are the only means to avoid such acts being repeated on a rising scale. We know that those who thus argue will always find a ready hearing. This is what produces the gearing effect of terrorism in the contemporary world, yielding huge results from acts of violence perpetrated by minimal numbers. It is not, I repeat again and again, that the mass of a particular population are violently or criminally disposed. Far from it; that population soon becomes itself the prisoner of the violence and machinations of an infinitely small minority among it. Just a few thugs, a few shots, a few bombs at the right place and time and that is enough for disproportionate consequences to follow.”


3

Posted by Leon Haller on Mon, 23 May 2011 06:13 | #

I like it! Not much as serious literature, but it reminds me of Dr. Pierce’s Hunter, and not only in similarity of titles. I’m sure there was some inspiration and influence.

You’re not the real author, are you GW? Or is it Bismuth?


4

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 23 May 2011 06:36 | #

Certainly not me, Leon, though the author does run a website well-known by nationalists in Britain.

Bismuth’s author, btw, is working on making the material into a novel.


5

Posted by anon on Tue, 24 May 2011 01:04 | #

The hate-filled misadventures of Bismuth are by far more instructive than this sort of thing. Satire sways with laughter, most of mankind’s weak spot.


6

Posted by tc on Wed, 25 May 2011 19:54 | #

Imagine…


...also..imagine, that discussion of this kind - oh, and not only the novel itself that is NOT yet outlawed…

So I say again - in the literally sense natürlich - IMAGINE!

mabbe, just mabbe…I am not the only one thinking ahead?


Imagine…


7

Posted by CL on Thu, 26 May 2011 14:25 | #

What a nice picture to have on the front page of your site, GW.

Is it of a man being beheaded?

The day before Belinda Smalls’ head was discovered at Stonehenge, along with those of Michael Cohen, Muhammad Aziz and Annabelle Armour,

You could’ve at least thrown in a Polish head to show you’re a real English nationalist.


8

Posted by Robert Reis on Sat, 28 May 2011 14:54 | #

http://alcuin-constant.blogspot.com/2011/05/astonishing-blindness.html

Astonishing Blindness
“Do you know why America is in a better state than Europe? Because you enjoy more freedom than Europeans. And do you know why Americans enjoy more freedom than Europeans? Because you are still allowed to tell the truth. In Europe and Canada people are dragged to court for telling the truth about islam.” So notes an article, A Warning to America, in The Brussels Journal on the anti-Islam Dutch politician Geert Wilders (from a speech he recently gave in Nashville).

Like many such publications, it fails to see the internal rot that feminism is, and blames the state of Europe on Islam. It fails to ask the hard questions about how Islam became so powerful so quickly in Europe. Millions of abortions? Harmful and insanely costly feminist-inspired social engineering? Sham divorces and millions of fatherless kids? Pushy entitled women crowding men out of the job market, forcing men into second-classdom? Nah, can’t be any of that.

“Because you are still allowed to tell the truth.” Since when are men allowed to tell the truth about feminism in western countries? Aside from MRA blogs, nowhere. Why doesn’t he mention that in Canada, America, and Europe men are “dragged to court” because of false accusations from their own women? Why the denial, the silence, of what is happening to western men? Why the indifference?

“I am currently standing in court like a common criminal for saying that islam is a dangerous totalitarian ideology rather than a religion,” Wilders claims. He continues: “Last week, my friend Lars Hedegaard, a journalist from Denmark, was fined because in a private conservation, which was recorded without his knowing, he had criticised the way women are treated in islamic societies.” How many falsely-accused men stand in court “like a common criminal”?

He presents himself as a defender of women, as if that is heroic, as if western women are worth fighting for, as if they are innocent. Western women constitute the gravest danger to men, freedom, the truth, and the west itself, yet they fall under the protection of these men. Go figure.

This is how blind Wilders is to the plight of western men: “The day when America follows the example of Europe and Canada and introduces so-called “hate speech crimes” which is only used to punish people who are critical of islam, that day America will have lost its freedom.” What about the numerous empty crimes that western women, “free women,” are using to send their own men to jail? Ironically, hate speech crimes should be used against feminists, but are used to buttress their movement.

Again, whose fault is it that Europe is in the following situation, Islam, or the xxxxing satanic feminists who pushed abortion and the encagement of men?: “I wish I could take you all on a visit to my country and show you what Europe has become. It has changed beyond recognition as a result of mass immigration. And not just any mass immigration, but mass immigration driven by the dangerous force of islam.”

Before Europe and the west was changed because of Islam, it had already changed due to feminism. That was a silent, invisible change, because it was so slow and men were so broad-sided by it. Undermining the family and men’s place in society predates Islam’s growth in Europe.

Wilder’s way of thinking makes a hash out of the present realities, and helps no one to understand the current situation in the west. Feminism and Marxism, the twin heads of the devil, have destroyed western civilization. Selfish, perpetually man-hating women have brought this on. Islam has simply been moving into a cultural, spiritual, and moral vacuum - brought on by liberals such as Wilders.

Wilders: “Islam is an ideology of conquest.” Really? What about feminism within western countries, taking over every institution, including the family itself, which makes it impossible for men to seek justice and cover anywhere. Even our closest allies, our families, have turned their backs on us? Can I depend on my 3 feminist sisters? Not xxxxing likely. They would enjoy my demise. And feminism, through the UN and western governments, pushes itself onto the peoples and cultures of Africa, Asia, and everywhere else it can. What about preferential treatment for women in Haiti after the recent disaster there, used as a way to disempower men? Is that not the characteristic of “an ideology of conquest”?

“Only two weeks ago, the British press revealed how the so-called “London Taliban” is threatening to kill women who do not wear veils in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.” Why, thanks for your concern for women. Have you shown any concern for men falsely accused of rape, or driven out of their homes and families by their own (bored, vindictive) wives? We men are literally being pushed out of our own society, and Wilders is calling for us to defend this society. Thanks. Where do I sign up?

Sharia law would be more favorable to men and their family problems than the current feminist-dominated laws. Isn’t that the real reason for Islam’s progress in the west? Yet not a peep from Wilders about vindictive, misandrist feminists, the real destroyers of the west.

“Polls show that the influence of those Muslims who live according to islam’s aggressive requirements is growing, especially among young people. ” What? Young people should be inspired by the empty, consumeristic, anti-family, anti-male, female-chauvinist society? Fuck off.

Wilders continues: “In my own country, the Netherlands, sharia is being applied by the courts in cases relating to divorce, child custody, inheritance, and property ownership. Women are always the victims of this because sharia discriminates women.” This one really takes the xxxxing cake. Men like Wilders are deaf dumb and blind to the curse that western women have created, and that men live under. Islam is not the problem. Feminists are. Entitled western women are the xxxxing problem. What’s the matter with men like Wilders, so unable to see the reality staring him in the face? Why shouldn’t men turn to sharia law? Why would they stick with western family and criminal law that punishes them simply for being men?

“Defenders of freedom” such as Wilders exhibit an astonishing blindness to the real enemy.
Posted by Alcuin at 7:02 AM Email This


9

Posted by Leon Haller on Sun, 29 May 2011 00:31 | #

Yes, feminism bears much of the blame for modern Western effeminacy in the face of multiculti treason and alien aggression.

But let us still praise Wilders for at least acknowledging the horrors of Muslim immigration, and for putting himself on the line to do something about it. Anything less would be churlish and childish.

Outside of mud-instigated race war, ours is still a sequentialist struggle. We must divide and conquer the enemy, step by step. We need to recover Occidental consciousness and patriotism. Once we have done so sufficiently, we can face down the muds. Once we have shown the fortitude to do that, watch how quickly our women (and Jewry) will fall back into their appropriate places.


10

Posted by John on Mon, 30 May 2011 01:02 | #

Leon: “But let us still praise Wilders for at least acknowledging the horrors of Muslim immigration…”

The immigration “horrors” have nothing to do with religion but rather with the temperament of the immigrants and behaviours arising therefrom. If the selfsame Arab and Negro immigrants were Christian, atheist or pagan, it would be no less horrible. Their religious beliefs have nothing to do with it.


11

Posted by Leon Haller on Mon, 30 May 2011 06:03 | #

The immigration “horrors” have nothing to do with religion but rather with the temperament of the immigrants and behaviours arising therefrom. If the selfsame Arab and Negro immigrants were Christian, atheist or pagan, it would be no less horrible. Their religious beliefs have nothing to do with it.

“Muslim” in the European context is generally an ethnic not religious designation. The Muslims rioting in France in 2005 were hardly good Muslims by the standards of Islam.

That said, you are totally wrong. Blacks are pretty awful everywhere, whether nominally Christian or not. But that is not so for Arabs. Christian Arabs tend to be both fairer-skinned than Muslim ones, as well as much more intelligent, civilized and commercially successful. Lebanese-Americans, for example, are overwhelmingly Christian, and also wealthier as a group than Anglo-Americans.

Christian Lebanese were always much closer to Mediterranean whites culturally and behaviorally than they were to Muslim Arabs.


12

Posted by anon on Mon, 30 May 2011 08:39 | #

Christian Lebanese were always much closer to Mediterranean whites culturally and behaviorally than they were to Muslim Arabs.

True. I read the precis of a genetic study years ago where Maronites (Canaanites / Levantines / Phoenicians) were found to have more in common with western Mediterraneans than with peninsular Arabs. The latter were a totally invasive breed. Christian Lebanese are good if unattractive stock; witness Brasil, in whose economic success they have played a leading role.


13

Posted by Philosopher King on Mon, 30 May 2011 16:07 | #

Seems like an interesting novel, I like that it’s (at least in the excerpt) written from the perspective of the mainstream establishment, this both shows the fear and hypocrisy of the elites, and gives the novel a greater sense of suspense.

In any revolutionary movement I feel that there are four camps:

Optimistic Idealists: These people think that power can be obtained through legitimate political avenues and through mass social and intellectual movements.

Optimistic Pragmatists: These people feel that power will be most easily obtained through underhanded, illegal, manipulative ways, which are nevertheless non-violent.

Pessimistic Idealists: These people think that violence is inevitable, but that the use of violence will either bring people to their side en masse, or result in massive fear and emigration from immigrant communities.

Pessimistic Pragmatists- These people think that the only resolution to the race problem will be an all-out war of attrition.

Like the novel, I consider myself a pessimist (at least with regards to the situation in America); I think that the percentage of whites will dip below 50% before any massive organization/movement explicitly advocating White nationalism is formed. When this happens, whites will have no choice but to seek power undemocratically, or “illegitimately.” I don’t feel however that violence should be viewed negatively, almost all great states in history have been forged by blood and without regard for democratic consensus.

I certainly don’t think that our movement will gain popular support by the majority of Whites; the key to victory is not focusing on attracting whites but opposing immigrants. Most immigrants come here solely to make money, if you make them fear for their lives, and decrease their financial certainty, they will leave. When President Eisenhower ordered Operation Wetback in the 1950’s ten times the number of illegal immigrants that were forcefully deported left on their own accord, the knowledge that forces were gathering against them was just as bad as the forces themselves.

I think that what’s needed right now (in America) more than anything is an organization to network, exchange ideas, and develop strategies in the real world. A3P is too political; we shouldn’t focus on politics until we’re organized. CoCC and The John Birch Society are too ideologically tainted, we need an organization which can appeal to anyone as long as they’re moderately nationalist (Radical Traditionalists, neo-confederates, anarcho-nationalists etc.). National Alliance is far too extreme and has too much dead weight. Creating a viable organization is the most important thing that we can do right now, all this talk about taking over the Republican party, seizing control of the media, developing a political wing, developing a paramilitary, etc. will amount to nothing unless we can at least do this.


14

Posted by Ivan on Mon, 30 May 2011 16:50 | #

Philosopher King,

You are one of not so many nice chaps @MR capable of coherent thought. But I believe that things will unfold in a much simpler scenario. The jewish abuse and fuck up of the entire global financial system will rich such proportions that it will blow up in their fucking faces in the ways no one can predict in minute details. To put it succinctly: The replay of the Weimar Republic on the global scale.


15

Posted by Philosopher King on Mon, 30 May 2011 17:48 | #

Ivan,

I’m not so optimistic. Historically financial crises result in an ideological shift to the left (think the October Revolution, Roosevelt, the current administration, etc.). Even National Socialism had many leftist attributes; and its ultra-nationalism was essentially the only thing distinguishing it from the Roosevelt administration.

There are other reasons the Weimar Republic analogy doesn’t work. Germany in the 1920’s was a highly homogenous society which suffered a great cultural/identity crisis from its loss in WWI. America today is “diverse,” has long abandoned any semblance of culture (if it had any to begin with as Oscar Wilde suggested), and has never suffered any significant setback which would lead it to introspection (except Vietnam, which again resulted in a shift to the left).

The Keynesian economic system, despite libertarian claims to the contrary, is historically stable. The system only unravels during times of great speculation. The Great Depression was an idiosyncrasy because speculation was rampant in every industry since the majority of investors didn’t understand how the markets worked. Today speculation is usually, but not always, limited to one sector/industry (oil, securities, etc.), while it’s true that all industries will suffer with speculation in the market (particularly if speculation is confined to an industry which affects all other industries) depression is far less possible. After the safeguards put in place after the 2008 financial crisis, and the fact that the government owns major portions of the banking industry, I don’t think it’s very likely that the market will collapse anytime soon. (Frankly my academic interests are Math and Philosophy, I don’t know much about economics apart from basic micro/macro, so feel free to correct me if I’m wrong)

So-called “collapse myths” are the plague of our movement; they support the idea that inaction is a sensible policy. Even if a collapse is inevitable it is our duty to organize swiftly and as early as possible to put us in a better position to obtain power under such a scenario.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Hybrid Swarms
Previous entry: Rapture: this is your final warning.

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Kamchatka Penninsula commented in entry 'Tillerson, Putin, Sakhalin, Fukushima: Why would Japan Hate Trump's outreach to Russian Federation?' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:18. (View)

Whales from Wales commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 02:36. (View)

Out of the woodpile commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 01:56. (View)

..his wife and daughters commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 01:20. (View)

Khalid Masood Mulatto commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 01:03. (View)

John Peel branches off commented in entry 'Pursuit of Authentic "Soul" Takes Wrong Turn From White Soul: Eat It - Humble Pie & Black Coffee' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 23:59. (View)

SA White genocide in gear commented in entry 'Suidlanders Reach out to Americans to Stop South African White Genocide' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:45. (View)

Wild Kamchatka commented in entry 'Tillerson, Putin, Sakhalin, Fukushima: Why would Japan Hate Trump's outreach to Russian Federation?' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:22. (View)

Guess who really did it? commented in entry 'Coerced Confessions of The Central Park Five' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:30. (View)

Colored Islam commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 07:04. (View)

It happens to Whites too: Norfolk Four commented in entry 'Coerced Confessions of The Central Park Five' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:18. (View)

Craig Cobb's new digs commented in entry '"Welcome to Leith" - A Review' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 05:17. (View)

Perhaps a Sallis type commented in entry 'Women Without Class' on Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:58. (View)

London Mayor's shocking omission commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:36. (View)

Canada passes Islamophobia motion commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:27. (View)

Cindy commented in entry 'Were the original Indo-Europeans from Europe, Asia or India?' on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:05. (View)

Tillerson: my wife made me do this commented in entry 'Tillerson, Putin, Sakhalin, Fukushima: Why would Japan Hate Trump's outreach to Russian Federation?' on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 03:41. (View)

Is Sylvain Mirochnikoff ((()))? commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:05. (View)

Yes, evidently Rebekah (((is))) commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:20. (View)

Robert Mercer on Civil Rights Act of 1964 commented in entry 'Women Without Class' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:55. (View)

Is Rebekah Mercer ((())) ? commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:48. (View)

Jane Mayer: Mercer, Dark Money, Bannon.. commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:06. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:48. (View)

Kumiko Oumae commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:12. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:51. (View)

Kumiko Oumae commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:45. (View)

Sharon Stone's X commented in entry 'On The Regnery Circus Big-Tent-O-Sphere, Featuring Richard Spencer as its Ring-Master' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:26. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The daunting task of policing in Sweden.' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 02:40. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Brett Stevens: Not just a Government Issue Patriotard, but a Full-Blown ZOG Disinformation Agent' on Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:09. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Brett Stevens: Not just a Government Issue Patriotard, but a Full-Blown ZOG Disinformation Agent' on Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:13. (View)

Kumiko Oumae commented in entry 'Bold and Brash Intelligence: Examining Geert Wilders and the PVV in the Netherlands.' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 22:42. (View)

Geert Wilders suspicious relationship with Israel commented in entry 'Bold and Brash Intelligence: Examining Geert Wilders and the PVV in the Netherlands.' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:36. (View)

Government issue children commented in entry 'Poland: Europe's Vanguard Nation - accepted just 0.21 asylum-seekers per 1000 citizens last year' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:23. (View)

Hungary's 'border hunters' ready for action commented in entry 'V. Orbán: “Hungary is in a State of Siege”' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 11:52. (View)

Poor Richard Partnership / Dickenhorst Farms commented in entry 'On The Regnery Circus Big-Tent-O-Sphere, Featuring Richard Spencer as its Ring-Master' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 11:13. (View)

affection-tone