The horizontally totalitarian future-world

Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 21 December 2008 03:22.

Last February, by way of an introduction, I put up a post about the great German jurist Carl Schmitt. He is a highly useful guide to the ways of Power. His elucidation of the theoretics of state power in extraordinary times established the framework employed by many, and probably most, thinkers in this, let’s say, increasingly topical field. In particular, Schmitt’s concepts of the decision and the state of exception open up the operation of total power for examination like a dead butterfly on a display board.

As Tom Sunic wrote in Homo Americanus: child of the postmodern age:-

Carl Schmitt ... realized an age old truth; namely, political concepts acquire their true meanings only when the chief political actor, i.e. the state and its ruling class, find themselves in a sudden and unpredictable state of emergency. Then all former interpretations of “self-evident” truths become obsolete. One could witness that after the terrorist attack of 9/11 in America — an event that was never fully elucidated — the ruling class in America used that opportunity to redefine the legal meaning of the expressions “human rights” and “freedom of speech.” After all, is not the best way to curb real civic rights the adoption of abstract incantations, such as “human rights” and “democracy”?

What just about everyone with a triple-digit IQ understands is that the events of 11th September 2001 and the subsequent War on Terror have been ruthlessly exploited throughout the West to advance a profoundly undemocratic and disturbing domestic security agenda. Whether a true state of exception ever existed is highly doubtful. But Power decides what is moral and what is, in a vulgar sense, true. It has decided that its officers shall usurp the legal code at will, and shall stipulate on their own authority the terms under which its citizens go about their business.

I happen to live under the most abusive of any Western government in this respect. The UK authorities have the Civil Contingencies Act already, and a growing DNA database to which it is intent upon adding us all, and on top of that it is constructing the complete surveillance society. But the trend is appearing everywhere.

What this amounts to is an impressively uniform and aggressive war on the defence of civic liberties which have informed Western legal codes for centuries. Its significance is vast and unmistakable: the foundations are being laid for a different kind of political regime, to be conducted in a permanent state of exception. The Executive is strengthening and freeing itself as a body empowered, but in no way constrained, by ad hoc procedural law subject only to official decision.

The big question is: what structure of global/local government will emerge out of this new strength and freedom?

In local, day-to-day terms, it will decide for domestic policy blandness and irrelevance - the towering racial injustice of an anti-white MultiCult make that inevitable. Meanwhile, the moral duty of government and public alike will be directed to far-flung places where “profitable problems” require corporate-military intervention.

To all intents and purposes, this will be a totalitarianism or dictatorship, if only because it must regulate more and more social relations in the interests of racial panmixia in order to resolve the problem of the European natives. But I can’t see how any form of world-wide imperial police state can emerge from the new dispensation, even given the coming of global economic unity.

If one assumes, as I do, that this dispensation represents the deepest political convictions of a diverse, internationalist power elite, and not only the will of bankers and mega-corporations, it is apparent that there is no “centre” capable of, or needful of, global government through a totalitarian vertical heirarchy. Schmitt holds the key. A permanent, global state of exception and the distribution of decision are enough. The governing class will operate as it does today, patronised and informed of its obligations by the higher elites without those elites ever comprising a structured global government themselves.

In a word, the deracinated, de-sovereignised, and legally denuded post-nation ...

“There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That is a 19th-century idea, and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.”
Wesley Clark, to a CNN reporter in 1999

“The president believes the world will be a better place if all borders are eliminated—from a trade perspective, from the viewpoint of economic development and in welcoming [the free movement of] people from other cultures and countries.”
Tom Hogan, president of Vignette Corporation, speaking after a convseration with Bill Clinton in Australia in 2001

... can be governed by a structure no different than the one that governs it now.

The future will, then, continue to be plural, and yet will be totalitarian. Our lives will be free in the ways that we are required to live them, but will be regulated in every other. We shall have “nothing to fear if we are innocent” from a non-law that is subject wholly to the decision of the, of course, always benign official.

Leviathan will command a near borderless world of super-diversity filled with national symbols. And we WILL be happy, although it will be as impossible to struggle for happiness as it will for political freedom.

Tags: Political Philosophy

Comments:

Posted by John on Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:32 | #

What just about everyone with a triple-digit IQ understands is that the events of 11th September 2001 and the subsequent War on Terror have been ruthlessly exploited throughout the West to advance a profoundly undemocratic and disturbing domestic security agenda.

I’d go further than that and say that by now, nearly anyone to the right of the midline should understand, (at some level anyway, absent some severe cognitive dissonance), that that such events were organized and overseen if not perpetrated with the objective (one of many, of course, the other major one being Western military intervention in the ME) “to advance a profoundly undemocratic and disturbing domestic security agenda.”

If one assumes, as I do, that this dispensation represents the deepest political convictions of a diverse, internationalist power elite, and not only the will of bankers and mega-corporations, it is apparent that there is no “centre” capable of, or needful of, global government through a totalitarian vertical heirarchy.

“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes her laws”—Meyer Rothschild

Taking Lord Rothschild literally there, a boycott of and/or alternative to their “money” would be a more effective way oppose them than politics. Easier said than done, obviously.

Posted by John on Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:17 | #

These guys might be onto something.

Posted by Bill on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:56 | #

I’m surprised that this comment has received so little response, for IMO this theme is at the epicenter of all that is being discussed here, namely what’s it all about Alfie?

It is evident that certain topics attract more attention than others, it is the fate of this post that a more interesting (to some) fare came hot on the heels of this post. I do notice this blog has the tendency to be like a bus stop, wait ages for a bus (post) to come along only to find when one does arrive it is accompanied by two more.

That aside, back to my musings. Postmodernism demands that things must change, and the big boys have decided now is the time to do it, there is a surge. Whether it is coincidental that this surge is because we’re starting a new century or that conditions are now ripe to ‘move on’ on - only history will judge.

Some while back, I started to tune into a guy named Alan Watts at his Cutting through the Matrix website. http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/ This came about as a result of a hat tip in a post by Revolution Harry who mentioned that Alan Watts ‘s ramblings were all about the long laid plans of our powerful elites. I decided to give it a go.

I have listened to Alan Watts now for several weeks, and his talks of approx 50 minutes sessions are indeed dedicated to the ideas and plans for our elite’s brave new world.

There are countless hours of this stuff available to listen to, and it is not my intention or inclination to catalogue in detail the contents, suffice to say, Alan Watt’s knowledge and expertise in this sphere is (to me) very impressive. I’m a very sceptical ‘half empty’ person and approach such things with caution.

Now, after several weeks of listening there does appear to be compelling evidence of what is appearing before our eyes has been in the planning stage for a very long time, especially during the course of my own lifetime.

In short, a New World Order is about to be born. Alan Watts takes his listeners stage by stage through the history of eugenics, bio engineering. social engineering and all the trappings of Huxley’s future Brave New World - it is truly frightening.

Having said this, my antenna is receiving disturbing vibes, like the BNP, I feel Alan Watts is not all what he seems, for example there has never (whilst Ive been listening) been any reference to mass immigration, or reference to race replacement - all rather odd wouldn’t you say?

What I am trying to say here is, from looking around me in the real world, there is little (if any) sign from people generally that anything is amiss in their ‘Strictly Come’ world - so it comes as a pleasant surprise GW presents us with a post like this - pity about the meagre response.

Posted by Desmond Jones on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:12 | #

Bill is correct. It is an excellent piece of writing. It is also interesting to see how the perspective moved, in just under a year from

The only question is whether we the people can survive long enough to strike the blow that brings Leviathan down. Pray that we can, and that for our children’s sake it is a political one

And we WILL be happy, although it will be as impossible to struggle for happiness as it will for political freedom.

Posted by Captainchaos on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:25 | #

Bill: “It is evident that certain topics attract more attention than others,”

Well, at least the presentation style. It’s Riefenstahl’s, er, I mean Richards’ fault. (If You Let The Jew Do a Number On You, Then You Will Really Be In The Stew. LOL!)

“...Revolution Harry who mentioned that Alan Watts ‘s ramblings…”

Another member of the tinfoil-hat brigade; along with Glyn Roach, whose eccentricities are a little more conventional and quaint. Damn, this faith gene just might be the death of us. I thought you Brits were more of the sober, practical variety, I thought us Yanks had the market cornered on nutjobs; guess I was wrong, oh well.

“I feel Alan Watts is not all what he seems,”

No kidding, he sells tinfoil to the lemmings so that they can put it on their heads (hey, Anti-Revolution Harry, WAKE UP!).

“...like the BNP,”

At least the BNP condemns massive non-White immigration, miscegenation and won’t allow non-Whites (with the exception of the Jew, er, I mean Jews) in the party. If we had anything like that in the States that got the share of votes the BNP gets the powers that be would be screaming that the Apocalypse had come. I saw a video of John Tyndale on the Covert Tactics site (yes, what a naughty boy C.U.N.T. is, I know) where he named the Jews and thundered about losing the English peoplehood as a result of mongrelization. Griffin has definitely watered down the message.

Desmond Jones: “It is also interesting to see how the perspective moved, in just under a year from…”

Now that is how you do trolling, silver could learn something.

Are you suggesting that GW now thinks that the downward pressure on the existence of our people will not continue? LOL! What he’s saying is that the System will try to find more ways to anesthetize the lemmings, whether it be with booze or tinfoil for Anti-Revolution Harry’s hat; but if the lemmings put down their booze and their tinfoil (yes, put it down Harry) long enough to resist, GW says THEN Leviathan will bust some skulls. Or am I missing something?

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:45 | #

Bill,

Judging from what you say about Mr Watts, I certainly don’t approach this question from the same direction as him. My weakness is for theoretics and long-distance prognostications, and that’s what this post comes down to.

CC,

No, as usual you’re missing nothing.

Posted by Captainchaos on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 01:47 | #

GW: “Judging from what you say about Mr Watts, I certainly don’t approach this question from the same direction as him.”

Here is a devilish thought: what if we got our guys to replace their guys? Substituting Richards for Watts and Fr. John for Pat Robertson (Pierce had some good ideas).

“My weakness is for theoretics and long-distance prognostications,”

That’s what really drives the nematodic scum nuts: deep down, they know, our best are better than theirs. We can beat them at their own game. That’s why I was able to do such a number on the faileocons; they tipped their hand to me even when they didn’t mean to. Once Gottfried gave me a muted invitation to come over to the “dark side,” stop having so much senile sentimentalism for the lemmings he says. I refused. Then he openly addressed me for the first time, accusing me of being a troll from the SPLC who was trying to wreck his career. All the little lemmings fell to their knees and begged Gottfried for forgiveness and told me to cut it out. I shit you not, it was almost surreal. And now Gottfried has seen to it that the loyal little lemmings have been shut out - no more commenting. Jesus H. Christ, what a slimy little piece of excrement. It is no coincidence, I think, that his bottom bitch, Spencer, is queer.

Now I understand why Pierce was so adamant about the need to completely clean house, to dispense with all the scum. If we can’t out maneuver our enemies by peaceful means, then it may come to that. It has been done before.

Too bad we can’t get real White men, like General Patton or Lindbergh, in charge. Are there even any such men left?

Posted by Gudmund on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:35 | #

Once Gottfried gave me a muted invitation to come over to the “dark side,” stop having so much senile sentimentalism for the lemmings he says. I refused. Then he openly addressed me for the first time, accusing me of being a troll from the SPLC who was trying to wreck his career. All the little lemmings fell to their knees and begged Gottfried for forgiveness and told me to cut it out. I shit you not, it was almost surreal. And now Gottfried has seen to it that the loyal little lemmings have been shut out - no more commenting. Jesus H. Christ, what a slimy little piece of excrement. It is no coincidence, I think, that his bottom bitch, Spencer, is queer.

HAHAHAHA!!!

Now if “Thpenther” is queer, how’s ‘bout Gottfried? What does it matter, if he is or not we can smear him as such and have a ball doing so.

Faileocons fuck off!

Posted by Gudmund on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:41 | #

Too bad we can’t get real White men, like General Patton or Lindbergh, in charge. Are there even any such men left?

I’d gladly give my life to attain Walhalla!

You do the dominant spirit of the Northman disservice!

-Gudmund Haraldsen-

Posted by Captainchaos on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 03:07 | #

Gudmund: “Now if “Thpenther” is queer, how’s ‘bout Gottfried?”

I recall seeing a little monologue by Spencer on Taki TV: he was lisping like a leaking air hose. What Gottfried does in his spare time I don’t know…

Posted by Gudmund on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:38 | #

Sorry for the foul language, btw. But the enablers of enemies of our people should not be given anything but abuse. Faileocons fall into this category.

Posted by Gudmund on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:47 | #

The future will, then, continue to be plural, and yet will be totalitarian. Our lives will be free in the ways that we are required to live them, but will be regulated in every other. We shall have “nothing to fear if we are innocent” from a non-law that is subject wholly to the decision of the, of course, always benign official.

Leviathan will command a near borderless world of super-diversity filled with national symbols. And we WILL be happy, although it will be as impossible to struggle for happiness as it will for political freedom.

Guessedworker,

How confident are you that this will occur? There is the possibility of collapse as well, is there not?

Western societies are already gutted and deprived of infrastructure, massively in debt and roiled by the ethnic plurality.

It just seems like the elites are playing a dangerous game with their strategy of tension. Events are never completely in one’s hands - there’s always the chance of things getting out of control. And since this is the most grandiose ploy ever crafted, it’s likelihood of spiraling out of control is astronomical, in my humble opinion.

Posted by Captainchaos on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:29 | #

“Let me preface what I am about to say by declaring frankly that I am prepared to accept violence on the part of our people. The Jews’ hold on our throat is not going to be relaxed until we break their grip. Hitler felt that he had to take to the streets. All normal approach to his people was barred. Today, we are confronted with much the same situation here. A censorship perhaps as tight as that imposed in Soviet Russia virtually closes off our access to press, radio or television as means of reaching the public mind. Politics are completely dominated by Money. In consequence, solutions by regular Constitutional means may now be impossible. If we are not to be destroyed, then we must fight. I am not naturally a man of violence, but there is one thing from the thought of which I shrink more than from violence or its consequences, and that is the thought that our people may not rise to throw off the death that is being clamped upon them. Those who are strong on theory and moralizing, but weak on action, may object that if any gain is to prove real and lasting, the means employed must be compatible with the end sought. But it happens that this is irrelevant to what I am saying. For the society I seek is one in which the use of force, in extreme circumstances, is accepted as necessary not only for existence, but also in order to make existence meaningful.” - William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man?

Posted by Armor on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 23:35 | #

If we are not to be destroyed, then we must fight. (Simpson quote)

I think white people won’t turn violent until society breaks down. For the moment, most internet activists who oppose immigration are still afraid to say that they oppose race-replacement. I’m not sure if they lack confidence or if they are being diplomatic. In the end, street violence from the whites will encourage internet free-speech. In fact, a white rebellion may force a change in western government policies without internet and anti-immigration organizations playing any role. Maybe white people will take to the streets and I will just watch them in action on youtube.

Posted by Gudmund on Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:26 | #

Those who are strong on theory and moralizing, but weak on action, may object that if any gain is to prove real and lasting, the means employed must be compatible with the end sought.

I like to think that this is my own position, and part of the reason why I leave the intellectual rigour to others on this site. I’m ready for whatever; just say the word. But how are we to ever have action when I cannot find anyone IRL who is really serious about “getting s—- done”?

Lenin and the rest of the Bolsheviks lived their cause for years. There was already a party elite and a grassroots populist segment (the Soviet) when Russia was in the critical stage of revolution. It didn’t just “materialize” - there was an action plan for years.

I don’t think it is a mystery that we have no such organization - thus, no revolution.

Motivation is terminally lacking in our people.

Posted by Captainchaos on Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:59 | #

Gudmund: “I like to think that this is my own position, and part of the reason why I leave the intellectual rigour to others on this site.”

That was the way I thought when I first ‘awakened’. Keeping reading and thinking about what is written here, and at other sites, and you’ll get there - I did, or at least it is starting to pop for me now. I believe you have what it takes to cover the intellectual ground. As GW says, paraphrasing, “Ideas matter, for they are the impetus to action.”

“I don’t think it is a mystery that we have no such organization - thus, no revolution.”

Our best minds are hard at work trying to figure out how to get it to happen. Check out the “Practic” link at the left-top side of the home page. There is some good stuff in there. Plus, if others besides “iqmoralcorrelation” start promoting it, he might stop being such an ornery old bastard (just kidding of course).

Posted by Gudmund on Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:59 | #

That was the way I thought when I first ‘awakened’. Keeping reading and thinking about what is written here, and at other sites, and you’ll get there - I did, or at least it is starting to pop for me now. I believe you have what it takes to cover the intellectual ground. As GW says, paraphrasing, “Ideas matter, for they are the impetus to action.”

Thanks for the encouragement, perhaps you’re right. I’m relatively new to this myself, and I have to make a living too. But I try to educate myself in my spare time. I only showed up at this site in September.

Ideas do matter. All the anti-intellectual WN types are shooting themselves in the foot thinking that street-level nationalism can get it done for us. Look what they did to Haider!

Our best minds are hard at work trying to figure out how to get it to happen. Check out the “Practic” link at the left-top side of the home page. There is some good stuff in there. Plus, if others besides “iqmoralcorrelation” start promoting it, he might stop being such an ornery old bastard (just kidding of course).

We wouldn’t be Euros if we didn’t have the ability to overcome hardship and find solutions. But it is not just the “cognitive elitism” that we need. The “will to power” is the fundamental agent of change in this universe, and we need to have people who, like the Judaeo-Bolshevists Lenin and Stalin, will “live” the cause.

It is very likely that the intellectual solution will have to fuse with the particular sort of personality (the iron-willed fanatic) in order for things to really get done.