The Folie of Existence: Hilbert, Husserl, Heidegger, Syntax and Semantics For the esoterically adventurous in the ontology project only, read on for a disquisition on the question of ontology without reference to existence involving Hilbert, Husserl and Heidegger leading to a syntactic and semantic approach for rigorous philosophical method. In pursuit of a rigorous philosophical method that purges the folie of existence from ontology, I’d like to present a few thoughts that, to mix metaphors, may draw from my Rosetta Stone a sword that cuts through the semantic underbrush:
Gian-Carlo Rota, section “Syntax and Semantics”, chapter “Syntax, Semantics and Identity of Mathematical Items”, part “II. Philosophy: A Minority View” of his book “Indiscrete Thoughts”. Notice that although Hilbert manages to eliminate the folie of the existential quantifier; his syntax “has resisted so far all attempts at semantic interpretation”. Let me now return to my Rosetta Stone to introduce Husserl’s notion of Fundierung to this problem:
Gian-Carlo Rota, chapter “Fundierung as a Logical Concept”, part “II. Philosophy: A Minority View” of his book “Indiscrete Thoughts”. My view is that Rota, himself, missed the significance of Hilbert’s elimination of the existential quantifier in his pursuit of introducing Fundierung as a logical concept. But I’m getting ahead of myself… Bringing now Heideggar to the table, you might want to, at your leisure, read my ancient post here at MR titled “The Primordial “As”: Gian-Carlo Rota” but let me reiterate simply this part: From “Indiscrete Thoughts” by the late Gian-Carlo Rota, Chapter XVII “Three Senses of ‘A is B’ in Heidegger”:
and
IMHO, Rota did not exaggerate the significance of Heidegger’s discovery here. Now let me try to unify the Epsilon Calculus and the universal “as” in an approach to a rigorous philosophical method for ontology without reference to the folie of “existence”, via this esoteric syntax and semantics. We will interpret the syntax: x(y=z) to mean: “y and z are identical as an x” or, equivalently (in our first foray into this semantic minefield where knowledge of the positions of the mines are “imprecise”): “y and z are identical as it matters to x” For the time being, I’ll choose the later meaning for reasons that may become obvious presently: Now let’s interpret the syntax: x(y≠z) Which is the same as the logical negation of the prior expression: ~x(y=z) to mean: “y differs from z as it matters to x” Now we may define: Existence: x(x≠y) That is to say: “x differs from y as it matters to x” or, in the, hopefully, now, obsolete language of the predicate calculus: ∃y Where did “x” go? That is precisely the mystery! Now, we proceed to drag Hilbert, kicking and screaming, into our semantic minefield by defining his Epsilon Calculus’s ε operator via its predicate calculus form: (∃x)F(x) in our new syntax: i(i≠x)F(x) The choice of “i” as the variable hints at a closure of identity within this new syntax and semantics. Comments:2
Posted by James Bowery on Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:44 | # I’m not expecting much understanding of the implications for the Epsilon Calculus from anyone anytime soon—especially as I, myself, don’t yet fathom its implications. I provided that as a link to a rigorous body work that may be in a sense brought to life through this semantics. As for the rest, my hope is that some of the folks dwelling in the language of phenomenology will be able to breath life into the syntax and semantics I’ve set forth as an answer to Rota’s challenge to bring Heidegger’s “as” into the status of a logical connective that subsumes Husserl’s Fundierung.. 3
Posted by Captainchaos on Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:00 | #
Philosophy is for fags. Real men settle their differences with single deadly combat. Post a comment:
Next entry: Introduction to Phenomenology
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:20. (View) weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:24. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:54. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:12. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:44. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:34. (View) weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:42. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:27. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:01. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:52. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:23. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 20:07. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:39. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:20. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:01. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:31. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:52. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 09:21. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:25. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:49. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:37. (View) |
Posted by robert on Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:07 | #
James - or anyone who understands this,
Could you give a non-technical summary or explanation of this post?