|
|
|
Naivete of Native Species Evolved in Isolation Zoologists refer to native species long evolved in isolation as “naive species” as they are susceptible to predation against which they have no evolved defense. Thus, it can have devastating effects when alien species are introduced to naive, native populations and habitats, even if inadvertently - as in the case of the brown tree snake or brown rats coming along with ships to the South Seas Islands, introducing them to naive species. Recent inquiry into my DNA revealed that the root of my maternal side - U5b1e1 - has been long evolved in isolation in Northern Sweden and Finland. The precariousness situation of my own niche evolution combined with discussion regarding the murder of Swedish native, Lisa Holm, to prompt my attention to the issue of naive human species being subject to predation against which they are not particularly evolved. The matter bears acute attention whether introduction of alien species is inadvertent or deliberate - as it surely is, in large part. Beyond the Augustinian devils of nature and inadvertent human behavior, comes the manichean capacity of human behavior where the “naivete” of native species may be concerned - the issue of the powers-that-be and their means of exploiting “naivete” in native Whites. The imposition of predatory species must also be inflicted knowingly - as Tanstaafl correctly argues, nobody is more aware of genocidal effects than YKW. Migration and lack of native preparation is not merely a result of Augustinian forces of nature or causes and impacts of market tendencies which might be solved conclusively. It is also a matter of manichean trickery - YKW rule changes of what openness, marginals and even what diversity means, to where they have imposed non-native “diversity” within native White populations, creating an atmosphere where social trust is and should be lowered - exploiting the fact that despite the unfortunate necessity of lowering trust for this alien introduction, that it is difficult for native Whites to relinquish trust for the conflict with their deep evolution of trust and the vastly preferable way of life that is corollary to that trust. In a word, they are using manichean tricks to foil and exploit the Augustinian disposition we have toward problems - i.e., in regard to natural obstacles, in solution to which we are more evolved. The borders that might protect our habitats and evolution are impacted not only in an objectivist but also in a manichean fashion. As Bowery has noted, our species, Northern in particular, have had a corrupt aspect of “civilization” imposed against our evolution. According to his cogent definition, “civilization” means that as opposed to individuals rising to defense, delegated groups are supposed to be responsible for border control - which would stave-off interlopers, especially in opportunistic pursuit of native females; in exchange, native European males are required to forgo, as unnecessary, our natural individual capacities to defend against interlopers; and with that, are expected to forgo untoward competition among our own for native co-evoltionary females. The key problem is that the border control end of the bargain has been reneged upon, with YKW and objectivists opening-them-up, while the native males remain beholden to that part of their evolution as sublimated and aligned for civilization in trust that their social capital is guarded. More, even where they might respond they are prohibited from fighting as individual White men against interlopers as they are forced to unilaterally uphold their end of civilization’s bargain. A corruption is in place, therefore, where our natural sublimation and meandering ease with our co-evolutionary females is ensconced - held in place, we are required, forced, to “live by our rules” of civilized behavior, our dormant natural abilities to compete effectively with our individual innovation and group organizational capacity against non-Whites is blocked, as we are corruptly held to standards of civilization unilaterally - to where we are prohibited from competing as we naturally might, while those entrusted with border/boundary control are blinded, bribed, corrupted to reneg-upon their end of the bargain as YKW impose invasive species upon us, allowing no defense. It is profoundly difficult to come to terms alone with the fact that our co-evolutionaries might betray us and that we should even have to say anything about it. We might care to observe from there that as the border control end of the bargain is reneged upon, the native’s evolved trust is corrupted thus as cynicism, creating hatred for the native kind’s female “altruism”, which becomes more like incitement, just as corresponding White male sublimation is transformed to resignation. ........................... When discussing the recent murder of Swedish native Lisa Holm, by immigrants, I had to defer to the fact that the suspects were two Lithuanian brothers. Still immigrants committing an egregious murder…but on the very page of the story: This Why doesn’t she go to Haiti? Well, the powers-that-be would not inconvenience her. Look what the local media has to say: “Five reasons Sandviken could really suit Wyclef” Published: 28 May 2015
No, “we” aren’t ones to judge, ‘we’ are purely objective and color blind.”
He fell in love - he couldn’t help it.
He’s planning. It is his agentive prerogative.
Which brings up a crucial point - you must look at what these housing developers and their real estate agents are doing: As objectivists, the bottom line is that they want to rent and sell units - ultimately, to whomever. The bottom line for the YKW is that they will seek to block-bust White communities, by perverted legal instruments, if necessary. I am unfamiliar with Swedish law, but in The U.S, White community busting, or “block busting” as it is called, is demonstrated in “The Fair Housing Act” which denied Whites the right to sell or rent property at their discretion. Does this sound like freedom for White people? That’s a U.S. law, true, but is the pattern any different in Sweden? No, they wouldn’t inconvenience her and her niglets-to-be. We are not only expected to not object, not just to make life convenient for them, but to be their slaves, prohibited from disassociating, forced in servitude while we facilitate our displacement and ultimate genocide. Who could possibly object? American-born rapper set to make Melodifestivalen history - http://www.thelocal.se/20110311/32520
In this morass of presumptuous Negroid entitlement, YKW liberalism tying our hands behind our backs, one can almost see how even Whites (if indeed, that’s what the perpetrators were), get enmeshed in utter disillusionment, in utterly cynical betrayal of all that matters, become utterly demoralized creatures, losing all bearing and respect.
The body of Lisa Holm, 17, has been found in central Sweden, five days after the cafe worker went missing.
Comments:2
Posted by MacDonald on suicide / genocide on Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:18 | # MacDonald interviewed, topics include: the suicide / genocide dispute; the destruction of marriage, beta males and the stable culture they might create. Whereas KM sees the marriage of betas as adaptive Truck Roy almost seems to look upon destruction of betas as a positive thing from a Darwinist standpoint (what a feminist position)..calls the sexual revolution a “60’s thing.”...typical right-wing crap… “alpha females got tired of marrying beta males” ...? What kind of pandering nonsense concept is that? Males and females should marry an appropriate partner, not typically one who is much better or worse. Again Truck implicitly blames White men, for the sexual revolution, etc., and not Jewish influence, notably Marcuse. White men would not hatch concepts like “the sexual revolution and polymorphous perversion” These things are Jewish. KM Does bring in Freudian psychoanalysis - saying that “liberation from sexual repression” was a fundamental plank. 4
Posted by Mick Lately on Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:15 | # Telling people that Jews are committing slow genocide against whites is like saying that “Damien is the devil’s son”. And yet it has to be said, bluntly and repeatedly, that “Jews are slowly killing us”. 5
Posted by Mick Lately on Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:24 | # While I appreciate the decorum and ambience of self-restraint on this website and on The Occidental Observer I think that there is a tactical argument to be made for escalation of anti-Jewish rhetoric to deliberately irresponsible and dangerous levels. Look at those Halifax TV advertisements and their promotion of miscegenation. This is all-out war as far as I’m concerned and we need full-bore exposure of Jewish anti-white animus. 6
Posted by DanielS on Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:04 | # I guess you mean these - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLfxTYIjX-s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BtIDkDIn0Q#t=49 Hell isn’t hot enough for them. 7
Posted by Mick Lately on Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:45 | # Mass non-white immigration + race-mixing propaganda = race mixing. The equation can be put as simply as that. And both the race-mixing propaganda and the race-mixing are getting more “in your face”, “in the streets”. Of course the psychological impact on white males is part of it. 8
Posted by DanielS on Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:59 | # You can put it simply as that. I’m not opposed to effective, pithy rhetoric. On the contrary. But there is also a place to look at more complex factors. These are not mutually exclusive concerns. These are issues of regaining cultural hegemony so that social rule structures are in our interests - aligning new and old brain as GW and MacDonald might wish. ...... I did go into some difficult complexity and started to feel uncomfortable with this: In this morass of presumptuous Negroid entitlement, YKW liberalism tying our hands behind our backs, one can almost see how even Whites (if indeed, that’s what the perpetrators were), get enmeshed in utter disillusionment, in utterly cynical betrayal of all that matters, become utterly demoralized creatures, losing all bearing and respect.
What is interesting me lately is how Whites can come to hate other Whites - fratricide and siblicide in a wider or narrower sense of the terms. Or, more mildly, why we cannot cooperate more. The concern is referring back to an understanding that emerged in an earlier part of the essay, which I have also made more clear: It is profoundly difficult to come to terms alone with the fact that our co-evolution- aries might betray us and that we should even have to say anything about it. We might care to observe from there that as the border control end of the bargain is reneged upon, the native’s evolved trust is corrupted thus as cynicism, creating hatred for the native kind’s female “altruism”, which becomes more like incitement, just as corresponding White male sublimation is transformed to resignation.
...................... Finally, we should not be so singularly beholden to impact memes. The distinction of Augustinian Devils (against which we, as Northern Europeans, are primarily evolved) versus Manichean Devils is important to discuss. Augustinian devils, natural challenges which don’t change the rules just to trick you when they are once solved. Manichean devils, human devils, which might change the rules upon their solution in order to foil you once again. More, talk of naive species, and the context of ecology is important and under-utilized. It is profoundly descriptive and a good way to bring liberals around to our way of seeing (ecology is not liberal). These important issues are glossed over by arguing “it can all be said so simply” There is nothing wrong with getting effective rhetoric out there. There is also a place to sketch some deeper matters for consideration. 9
Posted by Mick Lately on Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:53 | # 10
Posted by Their new normal: "It's not shocking" on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 05:53 | #
11
Posted by Mick Lately on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:07 | # White life is cheap. We are being attacked as a race and we have to defend ourselves as a race. And anti-white whites must be treated as enemies as well. 12
Posted by deleterious alleles come unhinged OOA on Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:15 | # Study argues that deleterious alleles come unhinged out of Africa where they are otherwise controlled.
13
Posted by Stockholm Syndrome Disco on Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:15 | #
Post a comment:
Next entry: Kristiina Ojuland, The Woman of European’s Hour
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) Computer say no by Guessedworker on Thursday, 09 May 2024 15:17. (View) |
Posted by Goldman Sachs Chair on EU immigration on Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:39 | #
Blacks sneaking on Trucks in Calais.. headed to England
http://www.infowars.com/shock-video-rioting-migrants-attempt-to-hijack-trucks-heading-for-uk/
This speaks volumes (at the end of the article):
However, Goldman Sachs Chairman and UN Special Representative for Migration Peter Sutherland said yesterday that Britain should take in more migrants in order to avoid creating an environment of “xenophobia and racism”.
Story Courtesy Stan Hess