|
|
|
Usefulness of a Founding Document? by Happy Cracker I was pondering what memetic support we can provide which might concretely help in the establishment of a government that adheres to our philosophy. At some point I came to the consideration of founding documents, and asked myself: what sort of a founding document would we produce to articulate our political philosophy? What I came up with will be easy to criticize on the grounds that it is obvious, and that it is ultimately just another statement. But I hope you’ll give the following example a fair hearing. “Charter of the Existence of the English Nation”. This would be a document which establishes, in a persuasive and accessible style: 1. The existence of the English nation, 2. What constitutes membership of that nation, 3. The value that the English nation has for its members, 4. The fact that the nation can die, and thus needs to be preserved, 5. The existential threat posed by loss of territory, esp. via mass immigration 6. Calls for the death of the English nation (cite: Steyn, Darby, Derbyshire, others), 7. The right of the English nation to exist into futurity, 8. The right of members of this nation to puts its preservation as foremost priority. 9. Further reading: reference MacDonald’s works and others. I can imagine a very embellished version, possibly even giving specific genetic data to delineate the boundaries of the nation. At the very least, a stripped-down and simplified version could be written for distribution to schoolchildren; it might take the form of a pamphlet. Its my opinion that nationalists and those raised in right-leaning households will view many of these memes as being self-obvious and barely worthy of being stated. I disagree, which is why I wrote this and will proceed to write the document. I think that there is a benefit to be had from stating these things explicitly and on paper. My reasoning is that, despite the obviousness of this to some, the left has been able to insert so much relativizing logic and uncertainty into discourse, that even while within one’s own four walls nationalism may reign, in the public space, all of these things are regarded as “up in the air”. Basically the left maintains an air of permanent skepticism about all assertions of nationhood. It is perhaps shocking to some that people believe enough in this to actually state it. Put simply: there is value in being explicit. Suggestions welcome. Comments:2
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 10 May 2009 01:33 | # Any chance of you writing an op-ed for one of the UK newspapers, GW? My expectation is not all of the pieces The Guardian publishes for example, or the others, have been sollicited by them but many “come in over the transom,” as the expression goes: are submitted unsollicited and then deemed “publicationworthy” by the editors and published. 3
Posted by Fr. John on Sun, 10 May 2009 05:36 | # “We philosophical Anglos have no foundational ideas that we can communicate. “ I disaagree. (of course) ‘Credo in UNUM Deum,’ etc. THAT is the GRUND of any cogent, logical, REAL philosophy. The ONLY Grund. Without it, yes, you ARE going to be unable to move, or be, but to merely “listen[ed] and moved the discussion on to other areas of interest.” Without solving a damn thing. I am reminded of the arguing of the Colonial Congress in the Musical 1776. John Adams (ever the practical Yankee Puritan) sings, ‘Piddle, twiddle, and resolve, not one damned thing do we solve, and it’s hot as hell, in Philadel—phia!’ We are going toward a war in the West, gentlemen. Are you muskets ready, and is your powder dry? 4
Posted by Happy Cracker on Sun, 10 May 2009 07:04 | # Thanks for putting this up, GW. My reply to your reply follows:
I’d like to have it clarified what you mean by ‘fictive teleology’. This would better help me to understand the context of the point you are making. As is, it appears you are talking about the Übermensch ideas and/or self-transcendence-through-warfare.
So, if I understand this reply correctly, you are using this instance of a discussion about NS to describe how philosophical differences can exist even under the banner of nationalism - and that these differences make the endeavor of authoring a founding document problematic. I thought it possible to circumvent this problem - i.e. that the ‘higher branches’ of our philosophies will necessarily be in disagreement - by sticking to the most basic facts.
What do you consider a ‘foundational idea’? I think that the existence of the English nation is a foundational idea. I think it is the foundational idea. Why are we sitting here, in leisure, debating things across fiberoptic cables, running errands in cars and trains, and participating in debate about government? The English nation, thats why. Why are we all stirred up about reforming immigration policy? The English nation. [Others insert in the name of your nations here]. Why is promiscuity bad? The English nation (i.e. its bad for us, because of our sociobiology and how we evolved).
I have difficulty fathoming this. Do you think such a complete philosophy could find expression in a few paragraphs, or would it require an entire book? What, concretely, is the above statement going to look like? You see, wherever you mention something that is based in science, I know what you are talking about. For example, we should state that our sexual norms are going to be based on our high-investment parenting strategy which has evolved in northern Europe. With this as a justification, we could prescribe some limits to the sexual propaganda now in the media and the libertine philosophy now at work in society. That would be an instance - admittedly, the best one I can think of - of a philosophy pertinent to life, being grounded in our sociobiology. I don’t understand how you imagine a philosophical description of “our distinctiveness and our character” being used as the basis of “the natural roots of our interests” - does that mean our political interests? Let me show you the degree to which I am not understanding you, by telling you what I think you mean: the English are adventurous and love sport, therefore - somehow our interests are defined by this? Why does the character of the nation have to be reflected to that extent in its political philosophy?
What constitutes an advance toward this goal? Please give specific examples of how we are advancing towards this goal. Are we moving towards a place where you will venture a first draft of such a document, and let us criticize it? 5
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 10 May 2009 10:49 | # Fred, Any chance of you writing an op-ed for one of the UK newspapers, GW? The Guardian is the only medium that publishes non-mainstream opinion. But my opinion is banned constantly. Here is what got me banned yesterday:-
and ...
Made the mistake of naming a certain party to our decline, I guess. 6
Posted by Al Ross on Sun, 10 May 2009 11:52 | # Bravo, GW. Your appetite for battle is prodigious and your logic is unassailable. It is a great tragedy that there exist White people who pathologize Euroman’s perfectly legitimate Ethnic/Genetic Interests in order to promote the EGI of racial aliens. 7
Posted by Genophobic Xenophile on Sun, 10 May 2009 18:16 | #
We must begin with morality. Sociobiology can only provide supportive material. European-Americans were complicit in both the passage and financial aftermath of the 1965 Immigration Act. Due to our greed for unearned “wealth” we happily invested our dollars in enterprises which brought Asian and Chicano labor into this country. There is much truth in the Mexican assertion that they are here to do the work we are unwilling to do ourselves, just as was the case with the slave trade. Faux “progressives” of the Right (or would that be the New-New Left?) want to preserve the ill-gotten financial gains and easy-money lifestyle provided by cheap foreign labor (both local and global). What bothers them is having the foreign labor next door and competing for high-end jobs. This cognitive dissonance is the Achilles’ Heel of implicitly white “cultural” conservatism and explicit racial “nationalism.” It is why most people agree with the Left’s assessment that conservatives and nationalists are supremacist, rather than separatist racial partisans supportive of free association. We can’t have our cake and eat it. The only long-term solution to the race-replacement problem is to recognize our moral culpability, financially divest ourselves of the present system to the greatest extent possible, and create a system which excludes those who would exploit us (Jews, white race traitors, intractable moral trucklers of the Right, and non-whites). The first requires honest self-appraisal. The second requires enterprise and sacrifice. The third requires courage. It is not easy to plead guilty to moral turpitude and correct the problem. We must do it, however, or face the unpleasant alternative. 8
Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 10 May 2009 18:32 | # I would be hard pressed to believe Germanic idealistic striving is not at least partially genetically based and likewise to agree the practical, empirical thrust of the English is not so rooted. If so, a genetic definition of what precisely the English are is key for preserving their racial character even in distinction to the “Krauts”, as well as Pakis, and of course Serb-Greeks. And no, “gene flow” into the English genotype is never “legitimate” coming from non-European sources, even genetic contributions from too many “Krauts” would be, then, not preferable. No? 9
Posted by Happy Cracker on Sun, 10 May 2009 20:45 | # Hey CaptainChaos, What do you think of this founding document idea? How would you envision such a document, if you had to author one? My hope is that once this document is authored for the English, similar documents can be prepared for other nations in like fashion. I feel that if we don’t provide some kind of philosophical statement that can be used, actually genuinely used as the basis for political action - then we really are dilettantes and armchair-ists. @Genophobic Xenophile: That is an awesome, awesome point, which I have rarely considered before. How do you see this rapprochement with morality being accomplished in the philosophical, political and practical dimensions? 10
Posted by Eman on Sun, 10 May 2009 21:44 | # A ‘founding document’ is too specific to a single nation, but something along of the lines of a ‘White nationalist manifesto’ (that applies to ALL White countries and territories) could be useful. 11
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 10 May 2009 22:18 | # Race should be explicitly incorporated into documents protecting the right of white people to survive racially intact the way it’s currently incorporated into documents that cancel that right (affirmative action laws, racial quotas, anti-freedom-of-association laws, etc.). But I wouldn’t refer to such protective documents as “founding” documents because they aren’t the foundation of the race. The race existed eons before. It’s made of blood, not ink. 12
Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 10 May 2009 23:11 | # HC, Points 1 and 2 of your suggestion for a founding document could be most precisely achieved by genetic testing. The raison d’etre of such a founding document should be to preserve the blood of the English, unalloyed, and the Isle of Britannia, unspoiled. Those are the inalienable responsibilities of the English State, in perpetuity. 13
Posted by Al Ross on Mon, 11 May 2009 00:22 | # Fred, when the Scottish lawyer, Lord Reid, wrote the constitution for the newly independent nation of Malaysia in 1957, he recognized the primacy of the host people and put in place ‘special rights” for the indigenous Malay community with regard to, inter alia, Malay ownership of land which could not be sold or otherwise transferred outside of the community. Of course, it was the least we Brits could do, having inundated the Malays with Chinese and, to a lesser extent Indian, immigrants to serve the interests of the business community during the colonial era. All White nations should make constitutional changes a la Reid for the protection of our EGI. 14
Posted by q on Mon, 11 May 2009 01:49 | #
Great idea! I’m sure our elected leaders are going to get right on it. 15
Posted by Al Ross on Mon, 11 May 2009 01:53 | # A Jew-God fearing American with an sense of irony, how extraordinary. 16
Posted by Al Ross on Mon, 11 May 2009 02:09 | # The cretinous implication by ‘q’ that I might imagine my suggestion to be amenable to the rogues, dolts, saboteurs and born again Christian mattoids who run the United Snakes of America is certainly an entertaining one. 17
Posted by q on Mon, 11 May 2009 02:22 | # Al, The point is: Our elected leaders are stinking cowards that bow down at the alter of political correctness, (which emphasises racial egalitarianism as it’s first and foremost commandment). NOT a “Jew-God” as you would like to describe it. 18
Posted by battle on Mon, 11 May 2009 03:32 | # THE RACIAL STATE: YELLOW HAN CHINA: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3307.0 INVADING PLUNDERERS: ENVYING WHITE LEBENSRAUM AND LONG-LIMBED WHITE WOMEN: EMINENT DOMAIN: THE CHINESE ARE AFTER YOUR LAND: RACIAL CHINA China is the most populous nation on earth with 1.3 billion. It is practically all Chinese. Hong Kong, even when it was independent was considered a “Chinese” city. The Chinese have a clear understanding of what China is. To them it is a nation of Chinese people with Chinese identity, history, culture, tradition character and dare I say it: The genetic underpinning of it all — the unique character of their DNA that gives them their appearance, their talents and their underlying nature. The Chinese are free from the overwhelming media propaganda that pervades the Western world and are free from a specific ethnocentric group that dominates the American media and has inordinate influence on Western governments. They are not saturated with propaganda intended to make them feel guilty for being Chinese. They know that if non-Chinese elements migrate or breed their way to dominance in some China provinces that it will ultimately result in conflict, and perhaps eventually to terrorism and civil war. That’s why even though there are some border areas of China where there are people of different ethnic origin, the government has consciously promoted massive Chinese immigration into those areas. They want one nation and they have consciously thought about their future and what will happen if non-Chinese minorities grow in great number. The Chinese who run their own media and their own government would never put someone in power, who was opposed to the rights of the Chinese to survive and thrive. That goes without saying, and that’s the difference between China and the European and American nations. China has 1.3 billion people. It’s all Chinese. In Europe and America as well as all other nations with significant White presence such as Australia and New Zealand and in South American nations, the White demographic shrinks ever more rapidly. ASIANS CAN’T THINK, CAN’T WRITE: Can Asians Think? (Blog) Posted: 24 Mar 2009 04:17 PM PDT A recent piece by John Derbyshire, very much worth reading in its own right, contained a link to a brutal depreciation of the Asian intellect by one Satoshi Kanazawa, professor at the London School of Economics. http://www.epjournal.net/filestore/ep04120128.pdf Prof. Kanazawa has plainly had it up to here with Asians and puts the smackdown on white multiculturalists who gain virtue points by talking up Asian superiority. The article begins with a section pleasingly entitled “Asians Can’t Think” that documents their pronounced inferiority to white people in creativity. (I’ve also written about Asians’ creativity deficit.) Intelligent Asians are great at making “making the robot dog Aibo look and behave even more like a real dog,” but they’re very bad at formulating the radically new concepts that make for major scientific innovations. http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/Blog/Blog/can_asians_think/
MULTI-RACIAL IMMIGRATION AND ITS DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES FOR WHITE ANGLO-AMERICA: THE DECLINE OF INTELLIGENCE IN AMERICA: EAT. SURVIVE. REPRODUCE. “WHAT’S IT ALL ABOUT?” In the long run, globalism and multiculturalism are a threat to almost everyone’s ethnic interest because both ideologies actually legitimize and increase ethnic competition. Globalism results in increased competition because everyone has potential access to everyone else’s territory, opening opportunities for plundering another’s backyard. Multicultural societies sanction ethnic mobilization because they inevitably become cauldrons of competing ethnic interests. In this very dangerous game of ethnic competition, some ethnic groups are better prepared than others. Ethnic groups differ in intelligence and ability to control economic resources. They differ in their degree of ethnocentrism, in the extent to which they are mobilized to achieve group interests, and in how aggressively they behave toward other groups. They differ in their numbers, fertility, and the extent to which they encourage responsible parenting. They differ in the amount of land and other resources held at any point in time and in their political power. Given these differences, it is difficult at best to ensure peaceful relations among ethnic groups. Even maintaining a status quo in territory and resource control is very arduous, as can be seen by the ill-fated attempts of Americans to achieve an ethnic status quo with the 1924 immigration law. Accepting a status quo would not be in the interests of groups that have recently lost land or numbers. It would also likely be unacceptable both to groups with relatively low numbers and control of resources and, conversely, to high-fertility groups. Yet the alternative—that all humans renounce their ethnic group loyalties—seems unrealistic and utopian. Indeed, given that some ethnic groups, especially ones with high levels of ethnocentrism and mobilization, will undoubtedly continue to function as groups far into the foreseeable future, unilateral renunciation of ethnic loyalties by other groups means only their surrender and defeat and disappearance—the Darwinian dead end of extinction. The future, then, like the past, will inevitably be a Darwinian competition. And ethnicity will play a crucial role.
19
Posted by battle on Mon, 11 May 2009 03:35 | # ——————————————————————————————————————————— http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3658.0 ——————————————————————————————————————————— THE CHINESE EXCLUSION CASE, 130 U. S. 581 (1889): ASSIMILATION is easiest “among people who are culturally similar to the dominant group,” but when different races are involved, “assimilation efforts become irrelevant”. Milica Zarkovic Bookman, ‘The Demographic Struggle for Power’, 1997. The historical record indicates that ethnic separatism among Caucasian-derived groups has a tendency to collapse within modern Western societies unless active attempts at ethnic and cultural segregation are undertaken. As expected from a resource-reciprocity point of view, in the absence of rigid ethnic barriers, marriage in Western individualist societies tends to be importantly influenced by a wide range of PHENOTYPIC features of the prospective spouse, including not only genetic commonality but also social status, personality, common interests, and other points of similarity. This individualist pattern of marriage decisions has characterized Western Europe at least since the Middle Ages. The result has been a remarkable degree of ETHNIC ASSIMILATION in the United States among those whose ancestry derives from Europe. This is particularly noteworthy because ethnic conflict and violence are on the rise in Eastern Europe, yet European-derived groups in the United States have an overwhelming sense of commonality. The long-term result of such processes is GENETIC HOMOGENIZATION, a sense of common interest, and the absence of a powerful source of intrasocietal division. The recent MULTICULTURAL movement may be viewed as tending toward a profoundly non-Western form of social organization that has historically been much more typical of Middle Eastern segmentary societies centered around discrete homogeneous groups. ETHNIC SELF-INTEREST is important in human affairs, and obviously ETHNICITY remains a common source of group identity in the contemporary world. People appear to be aware of group membership and have a general tendency to devalue and compete with outgroups. Individuals are also keenly aware of the relative standing of their own group in terms of resource control and relative reproductive success. They are also willing to take extraordinary steps to achieve and retain economic and political power in defense of these group imperatives. It is noteworthy that minority groups, especially African-American and Latino groups, have already developed strong ethnic identities in the U.S. These movements often have militant, racialist overtones. For example, Afrocentrism is often associated with racialist ideologies, such as those of Molefi Asante (1987), in which ethnicity is viewed as the morally proper basis of self-identity and self-esteem and in which a close connection exists between ethnicity and culture. Latino ethnic activists Latino activists have a clearly articulated policy of “reconquering” parts of the United States via immigration and high birth rates. In the long run, globalism and multiculturalism are a threat to almost everyone’s ethnic interest because both ideologies actually legitimize and increase ethnic competition. Globalism results in increased competition because everyone has potential access to everyone else’s territory, opening opportunities for plundering another’s backyard. Multicultural societies sanction ethnic mobilization because they inevitably become cauldrons of competing ethnic interests. In this very dangerous game of ethnic competition, some ethnic groups are better prepared than others. Ethnic groups differ in intelligence and ability to control economic resources. They differ in their degree of ethnocentrism, in the extent to which they are mobilized to achieve group interests, and in how aggressively they behave toward other groups. They differ in their numbers, fertility, and the extent to which they encourage responsible parenting. They differ in the amount of land and other resources held at any point in time and in their political power. Given these differences, it is difficult at best to ensure peaceful relations among ethnic groups. Even maintaining a status quo in territory and resource control is very arduous, as can be seen by the ill-fated attempts of Americans to achieve an ethnic status quo with the 1924 immigration law. Accepting a status quo would not be in the interests of groups that have recently lost land or numbers. It would also likely be unacceptable both to groups with relatively low numbers and control of resources and, conversely, to high-fertility groups. Yet the alternative—that all humans renounce their ethnic group loyalties—seems unrealistic and utopian. Indeed, given that some ethnic groups, especially ones with high levels of ethnocentrism and mobilization, will undoubtedly continue to function as groups far into the foreseeable future, unilateral renunciation of ethnic loyalties by other groups means only their surrender and defeat and disappearance—the Darwinian dead end of extinction. The future, then, like the past, will inevitably be a Darwinian competition. And ethnicity will play a crucial role. From the present perspective no fundamental conflict exists between the latter two sources of American identity; social homogeneity and hierarchic harmony may well be best and most easily achieved with an ethnically homogeneous society of peoples derived from the European cultural area. Indeed, in upholding Chinese exclusion in the nineteenth century, Justice Stephen A. Field noted that the Chinese were unassimilable and would destroy the republican ideal of social homogeneity. The incorporation of non-White peoples, and especially peoples derived from Africa, into peculiarly Western cultural forms is profoundly problematic. THE CHINESE EXCLUSION CASE, 130 U. S. 581 (1889): http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3057.15 http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3191.0 WESTERN SURVIVAL: Emulating Key Elements of Judaism: In the United States we are presently heading down a volatile path—a path that leads to ethnic warfare and to the development of collectivist, authoritarian, and racialist enclaves. Although ethnocentric beliefs and behavior are viewed as morally and intellectually legitimate only among ethnic minorities in the United States, the development of greater ethnocentrism among White peoples is a likely result of present trends. The prediction, both on theoretical grounds and on the basis of social identity research, is that as other groups become increasingly powerful and salient in a multicultural society, the White peoples of the United States will become increasingly unified; among these peoples, contemporary divisive influences, such as issues related to gender and sexual orientation, social class differences, or religious differences, will be increasingly perceived as unimportant. Eventually these groups will develop a united front and a collectivist political orientation vis-a-vis the other ethnic groups. Other groups will be expelled if possible or partitions will be created, and Western societies will undergo another period of medievalism. http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3658.0 20
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 11 May 2009 04:57 | # As an example of what wouldn’t be allowed once we’ve got our right to racial survival on paper, look at the words which Jack Black, who runs the blog “I Am an Englishman,” posts today, quoted from Scottish jounalist and BBC big shot Andrew Marr: ( http://www.iamanenglishman.com/ )
21
Posted by the Narrator... on Mon, 11 May 2009 07:02 | # What exactly is England’s demographic situation now, percentage wise? I ask because the lower the percentage of British Whites the greater the effect on any Founding Documents. 22
Posted by battle on Mon, 11 May 2009 07:11 | # Posted by the Narrator: “What exactly is England’s demographic situation now, percentage wise? I ask because the lower the percentage of British Whites the greater the effect on any Founding Documents.” Not necessarily. Whites are still in the majority. HOWEVER: “The present immigration policy essentially places the United States and other Western societies “in play” in an evolutionary sense which does not apply to other nations of the world, where the implicit assumption is that territory is held by its historically dominant people: Each racial and ethnic group in the world has an interest in expanding its demographic and political presence in Western societies and can be expected to do so if given the opportunity….The prediction, both on theoretical grounds and on the basis of social identity research, is that as other groups become increasingly powerful and salient in a multicultural society, the European-derived peoples of the United States will become increasingly unified; among these peoples, contemporary divisive influences, such as issues related to gender and sexual orientation, social class differences, or religious differences, will be increasingly perceived as unimportant. Eventually these groups will develop a united front and a collectivist political orientation vis-a-vis the other ethnic groups. Other groups will be expelled if possible or partitions will be created, and Western societies will undergo another period of medievalism… There is a growing realization that the counter-cultural revolution of the 1960s is a watershed event in the history of the United States. Such a conceptualization is compatible with the work of Roger Smith (1988), who shows that until the triumph of the cultural pluralist model with the counter-cultural revolution of the 1960s, there were three competing models of American identity: the “liberal” individualist legacy of the Enlightenment based on “natural rights”; the “republican” ideal of a cohesive, socially homogeneous society (what I have identified as the prototypical Western social organization of hierarchic harmony); the “ethnocultural” strand emphasizing the importance of Anglo-Saxon ethnicity in the development and preservation of American cultural forms. . From the present perspective no fundamental conflict exists between the latter two sources of American identity; social homogeneity and hierarchic harmony may well be best and most easily achieved with an ethnically homogeneous society of peoples derived from the European cultural area. Indeed, in upholding Chinese exclusion in the nineteenth century, Justice Stephen A. Field noted that the Chinese were unassimilable and would destroy the republican ideal of social homogeneity. As indicated above, the incorporation of non-European peoples, and especially peoples derived from Africa, into peculiarly Western cultural forms is profoundly problematic.” http://www.euvolution.com/articles/lastchap.html ============================= BRITISH WOMEN PAY HIGH PRICE FOR MULTICULTURALISM An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Fertility: BETWEEN-GROUP COMPETITION FOR RESOURCES “Given that 90% of recent immigrants to the U.S. are non-European, this implies selection differentials against European peoples. Using the logic in Macunovich’s Table 4 which assumes an approximate equivalence between number of immigrants and number of births foregone by U.S. women because of RCS effects, and assuming a legal immigration rate of approximately 800,000 per year and a net illegal immigration rate of approximately 275,000 (Krikorian, 1999), U. S. women are foregoing over one million births per year as a result of immigration. (This does not include the suppressive effects on the native birth rate of the children of the immigrants in the next generation. It is thus a very conservative estimate.) Since European-derived peoples presently constitute around 75% of the U.S. population, Macunovich’s model implies that there are approximately 750,000 fewer births per year among the European-derived peoples of the U.S. than there would be in the absence of immigration. Due to the greater genetic overlap between recent immigrants and established U.S. citizens from immigrant-sending countries such as Mexico, the selection differential is much less in the case of present U.S. women who derive from immigrant-sending areas.” 23
Posted by battle on Mon, 11 May 2009 07:14 | # The Problem of Western Civilization http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3698.0 ================================================ Kyle Bristow - 4/1/2008 http://globalpolitician.com/24394-western-civilization Western civilization seems to be deathly ill with a problem that has yet to be diagnosed. Some people suggest that the rise of Islam is the principle problem that faces the Occident in contemporary times. Other people suggest that a secularization of the Western people is the main quandary. Still others suggest that a balkanization of American culture is the primary dilemma. In my opinion the aforementioned problems are only symptoms of the true problem, which is that Westerners lack the willpower to defend their civilization. Europe has been taken over by political parties and institutions that are tolerant of foreign cultures when they should not be. A people who stone women to death for being sexually assaulted to defend the supposed “honor” of a family, decapitate journalists, execute homosexuals, deny people the right of free speech, deny people the right to participate in any religion they choose, engage in the trade of catamites, murder black Christians in Africa, worship an alleged prophet who had sexual relations with a nine-year-old girl named Aisha, or commit acts of terrorism for the greatness of Allah is a backwards civilization that should not be invited or encouraged to conquer Occidental countries. Europeans fought Islamic invaders at the siege of Vienna in 1683 and successfully put an end to their conquest of Europe. Unfortunately Europeans no longer are fighting the Islamic invaders today; in fact, they are helping them, which was evidenced by NATO’s support of the Albanian Muslims during the Kosovo conflict in the late 1990s. Due to the support of the European community and the United States, a predominantly Islamic country on European soil was allowed to form, in which nuns and churches are attacked without mercy as the Islamic populace purges the newly established country of “Infidels.” Tolerance is a bad thing when evil is tolerated. A prime example of cultural subversion that anti-Western political parties in Europe perpetrate is the case of what is happening in Brussels, Belgium. The mayor, Freddy Thielemans, is a member of Parti Socialiste (PS), and has done some rather vile things while in office. For example, upon hearing the news that Pope John Paul II had died, he ordered champagne from a waiter in a restaurant to celebrate. His political party also encourages Muslims to immigrate to Belgium so that the Flemish, the indigenous people of Belgium, have to compete with more people at the voting booth. During the Islamic holiday season of Ramadan, by Thielemans’ decree, police officers are no longer allowed to eat food or drink coffee while working in public. When Europeans decided to rally outside the European Union Parliament in Brussels on September 11, 2007 to protest the Islamization of Europe, he banned the protest from occurring and declared that anyone who showed up would be arrested. Some members of Vlaams Belang, a pro-Flemish political party, defiantly protested and were arrested. Americans are as guilty as Europeans of not defending Western civilization. The United States of America has had enemy troops on its soil only once—during the War of 1812—and that was nearly 200 years ago. In the history of America, the country has only been successfully attacked on two occasions: The date which will live in infamy and on September 11, 2001. Since the country is rarely attacked by foreign peoples, it gives the impression that the American people seem to not be able to grasp the simple concept that there are states and people in the world which desire to destroy Western civilization. Unfortunately who makes it to the next round of American Idol and who is kicked off of Survivor seems to be more important to the American people than the assault on their way of life by savages. The inability to comprehend the fact that the world is full of evildoers causes Westerners to both lower their guard to foreign threats and to remain apathetic about the crisis. When Westerners do defend their culture, they are branded “racist,” “xenophobic,” or “fascist” by either foreign enemies or domestic traitors. For example, when it comes to the debate involving immigration, La Raza, which translates into English to mean “The Race,” is an ethnocentric organization for Mexicans that quickly labels organizations that are opposed to mass and illegal immigration to the United States as “bigots.” Why is it that foreigners have a right to promote their interests, but Westerners are not allowed to promote their own national interests in their homeland without being called derogatory names? The multiculturalists are trying to force Westerners to assimilate to ways of life that are foreign in origin. Why should a Westerner tolerate foreign languages being forced upon them? Why should an American have to press one for English or two for any other language when making a phone call? Why should an American not be accepted into college or get a job, because the employer or college administrator is told to create a “diverse” environment. Why should an American have to pay welfare benefits or the bill for a hospital visit of an illegal alien who decided to immigrate unlawfully to the United States? Why should an American have to work all their life and have the government tax their paychecks to pay for the Social Security check of those who immigrate to the United States? The American people are told that they are “racist” if they promote their own interests over those of foreigners. I, for one, do not apologize for putting my own people first. Woe to the people who neglect their own. Traitors to Western civilization feel that Westerners should apologize to the world for things such as slavery, causing so-called global warming, denying women the right to vote, establishing colonies, fighting the Crusades, not allowing for homosexual “marriage,” and whatnot. I have nothing to apologize for. While my civilization produced Bachs and Mozarts, Einsteins and Pasteurs, Aristotles and Platos, the people of other cultures were sacrificing captives to the “sun god,” shoving bones through their noses, and running through the forests in loincloths with the intent of scalping one another. I do not regret being a Westerner for one minute. The only regret that I have is that so many of my fellow Westerners are ashamed of the civilization to which they belong, which is the same one that cured Polio and Smallpox and put mankind on the moon. If there ever was a Western Civilization Month, like how there is a month for other cultures, there would not be enough time to celebrate all the advances that Western civilization has contributed to the world. Instead of promoting the interests of foreigners, we should promote only our own interests. Instead of subverting our civilization, we should defend it. Why is this such a difficult concept for so many Westerners to grasp? If the problem is not rectified soon, it will only grow worse and we will cross the point of no return. Kyle Bristow was until recently the chairman of Young Americans for Freedom chapter of Michigan State University, which had become famous due to its lively and controversial meetings under his leadership. 24
Posted by battle on Mon, 11 May 2009 07:22 | # MULTICULTURAL FAILURE: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3726.0 http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3696.0 RACIAL & ETHNIC SELF-SEGREGATION: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3770.0 US AND THEM [The Enduring Power of Ethnic Nationalism]: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3769.0 THE FOUNDERS’ POSTERITY: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3768.0 The World’s New Numbers: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3700.0 “LILY-LIVERED” EUROPE HAS SURRENDERED TO ISLAM: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3722.0 How “European Islam” Will Complete the Global Muslim Caliphate: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3713.0 THE DECLINE OF THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING WORLD: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3699.0 http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3707.0 ETHNIC NEPOTISM & THE REALITY OF RACE: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3665.0 ANTI-CHINESE TENSIONS ON THE RISE IN AUSTRALIA: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3658.0 http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3635.0 25
Posted by battle on Mon, 11 May 2009 07:26 | # THE FIVE CARDINAL LAWS 276 THE CHAOS “The struggle which means destruction for the fundamentally weak race steels the strong; the same struggle, moreover, by eliminating the weaker elements, tends still further to strengthen the strong.” Houston Stewart Chamberlain: The Foundations of the 19th century. 2nd ed., published by John Lane, The Bodley Head, 1912. 26
Posted by battle on Mon, 11 May 2009 07:27 | # Foundations: http://www.hschamberlain.net/grundlagen/division2_chapter4.html ============================================== THE FIVE CARDINAL LAWS 276 THE CHAOS “The struggle which means destruction for the fundamentally weak race steels the strong; the same struggle, moreover, by eliminating the weaker elements, tends still further to strengthen the strong.” Houston Stewart Chamberlain: The Foundations of the 19th century. 2nd ed., published by John Lane, The Bodley Head, 1912 27
Posted by FIGHT THE INVADERS on Mon, 11 May 2009 10:08 | # Two illegal aliens, Ralphel Resindez, 23, and Enrico Garza, 26, probably believed they would easily overpower home-alone 11 year old Patricia Harrington after her father had left their two-story home. It seems the two crooks never learned two things: they were in Montana and Patricia had been a clay shooting champion since she was nine. Patricia was in her upstairs room when the two men broke through the front door of the house. She quickly ran to her father’s room and grabbed his 12 gauge Mossberg 500 shotgun. Resindez was the first to get up to the second floor only to be the first to catch a near point blank blast of buckshot from the 11-year-old’ s knee crouch aim. He suffered fatal wounds to his abdomen and genitals. When Garza ran to the foot of the stairs, he took a blast to the left shoulder and staggered out into the street where he bled to death before medical help could arrive. It was found out later that Resindez was armed with a stolen 45 caliber handgun he took from another home invasion robbery. That victim, 50-year-old David Burien, was not so lucky. He died from stab wounds to the chest. Ever wonder why good stuff never makes NBC, CBS, PBS, & MSNBC, CNN, or ABC news. 29
Posted by Lurker on Mon, 11 May 2009 11:50 | # I love the Patricia Harrington story, I’ve heard it before, which is why I tried to find out more, and ended up here. Which is a shame, even some of the comments at the guywhite blog reflect this. 30
Posted by Lurker on Mon, 11 May 2009 11:59 | # Somewhat O/T Our old AP pal Diamed is touting his wares here. 31
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 11 May 2009 13:14 | # I agree with Al Ross: good selection of links posted by Battle. Everyone should at least read this MacDonald chapter Battle linked: http://www.euvolution.com/articles/lastchap.html . The story posted by “Fight the Invaders” is also superb, and his final question demands an answer: Why don’t we hear of these good stories? Rhetorical question, of course: we don’t hear of them because they anger the men who control the MSM, men who were rooting for the Mexican home invaders and against little Patricial Harrington and David Burien. The men who run the MSM want the Mexicans to win over the Euros. What sort of men want that? At least three kinds: Jews, homosexuals, and sociopathically alienated non-homosexual Euro élites. Draw your conclusions. 32
Posted by ROBERT CROSS on Mon, 11 May 2009 13:14 | # Have we all given up on the undrip?surely this is a weapon to fight with,but while no-one mentions it ,like our bill of rights ,it is allowed to fade from the minds of the people,until they do not believe in its legallity.undrip contains all of the rights contained and promoted in this thread,a serious challenge needs to be mounted to force recognition of our rights under it,so who will try?I have ,but as i have “no standing” my complaint was easily ignored,so i appeal to the most intelligent bretheren on this site to at least give it a try and fight them with thier own rules,the embarrasment would at least provoke futher questions,and perhaps even sink into the frightened minds of the English people. 33
Posted by Captainchaos on Mon, 11 May 2009 15:56 | #
It is useful to point out the hypocrisy and injustice directed towards indigenous Europeans within the context of the existing international system. However, the point of a founding document of this sort is to empower Europeans to protect their ethnic interests regardless of the international system, and ultimately to separate themselves from it. Also, in a founding document that is supposed to set the tone for the very long term, culture and idealistic striving cannot be neglected. GW has complained that many of the young are going away to a better life in the Dominions, well, what would make them more want to come back than for Britain to once be the place to be. Make Britain ‘Great’ again, turn London into a ‘Jerusalem’ onto which Anglo-Saxon expats project their ideals. 34
Posted by Captainchaos on Mon, 11 May 2009 16:30 | # Many were once Anglophiles for good reason, including the King of the Krauts, Uncle Adolf. The English Victorian moral confidence lay in the actual vital energy Anglo-Saxons displayed at that time; civility, an order of rank amongst their people, inventiveness. They believed they were the best because they were the best. Why not lay all that out in a founding document as well? ‘This is who we are, at our best, and expect ourselves to forever be.’ Palingeneticism which aims for superior cultural civility and inventiveness rooted in consciousness of the Anglo-Saxon ethnic being; the latter understood as a necessary condition for the former, whilst the former is understood as a celebration, a realization and a protection of the latter. An eternal virtuous circle. 35
Posted by Gudmund on Mon, 11 May 2009 18:52 | #
Not to mention that the international system has no legitimacy anyway. Institutions like the UN are manifestations of Judaeo-Globalist megalomania. They are not consonant with the European soul as we, the once-conquerers of the world, do not need the consent of a world community in order to do as we will. Such sets of circumstances can only hold us back from accomplishing our goals. We will craft a new international system with us at the top of the pecking order once again. Don’t misunderstand, I’m not urging destructive behavior. But it’s a fact that things work best when whitey is on top - for everyone. 36
Posted by Gudmund on Mon, 11 May 2009 18:56 | # We needn’t engage in the imperial folly of our forefathers, but we ought to be the ones dictating the terms to the world. And with our weapons, food and water supplies, etc, we have the wherewithal to do so. Any other arrangement would not be satisfactory. 37
Posted by Captainchaos on Mon, 11 May 2009 19:45 | # Here is an example of that “Old Time Religion” GT (Genophobic Xenophile) might appreciate:
38
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 11 May 2009 20:44 | # It’s an enormous theological plus for a Christian sect to explicitly forbid white-nonwhite racial miscegenation. That right there strongly attracts me to that particular religion although I know nothing else about it, just as the explicit welcoming of white-nonwhite miscegenation in <strike>official</strike> offal Catholicism and maincesspool Protestantism strongly repels me. 40
Posted by battle on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:12 | # Posted by Al Ross on May 11, 2009: “I like the posts of ‘battle’.” THANK YOU Al Ross, & Fred Scrooby… Much Appreciated. “The struggle which means destruction for the fundamentally weak race steels the strong; the same struggle, moreover, by eliminating the weaker elements, tends still further to strengthen the strong.” Houston Stewart Chamberlain: The Foundations of the 19th century. 2nd ed., published by John Lane, The Bodley Head, 1912 “In the United States we are presently heading down a volatile path—a path that leads to ethnic warfare and to the development of collectivist, authoritarian, and racialist enclaves. Although ethnocentric beliefs and behavior are viewed as morally and intellectually legitimate only among ethnic minorities in the United States, the development of greater ethnocentrism among White peoples is a likely result of present trends. The prediction, both on theoretical grounds and on the basis of social identity research, is that as other groups become increasingly powerful and salient in a multicultural society, the European-derived peoples of the United States will become increasingly unified; among these peoples, contemporary divisive influences, such as issues related to gender and sexual orientation, social class differences, or religious differences, will be increasingly perceived as unimportant. Eventually these groups will develop a united front and a collectivist political orientation vis-a-vis the other ethnic groups. Other groups will be expelled if possible or partitions will be created, and Western societies will undergo another period of medievalism.” Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique 41
Posted by battle on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:16 | # Racial and ethnic self-segregation Kevin MacDonald January 1, 2009 http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Chicago.html Two recent articles ( http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/dec/26/local/chi-segregation-26-dec26 , http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/dec/29/local/chi-oswego-side_29dec29 ) in the Chicago Tribune show that self-segregation is still the norm in 21st-century America. When whites move to Chicago, they naturally gravitate to the North Side, while blacks head to the South Side. Many of these whites doubtless voted for Obama, but “they aren’t nearly as interested in living in neighborhoods rich in color.”
This behavior conflicts with the official multicultural utopian attitudes that are so apparent in the articles. But it does conform to psychological research that people naturally prefer to associate with people who are similar to themselves. In fact, there are deep psychological roots to ethnocentrism that make us attracted to and more trusting of genetically similar others. Douglas Massey, a Princeton University expert on segregation, is quoted to the effect that “although white attitudes have changed and they don’t believe in segregation in principle very much anymore, . . .in intimate settings their comfort level isn’t very high.” Sociologists such as Robert Putnam have also shown that ethnic homogeneity is associated with greater trust of others and greater political participation.
The diversity industry is well aware that most whites don’t want to live among non-whites. Here’s a poster from one such group, aricherlife.org. The caption reads in part “Your workplace thrives on diversity, so why shouldn’t your neighborhood? Diversity expands horizons, promotes understanding, prepares our kids. It promises us all a richer life.”
The logic is that ambitious white parents will want to move to diverse neighborhoods to improve their children’s career chances in the even more diverse. globalized world of the future. So far, it doesn’t seem to be happening.
Of course, whites can’t be explicit about these preferences. Colin Lampark, the white engineer who moved to Lincoln Park, claims he didn’t move to the South Side because “just doesn’t know anyone on the South Side.” This would seem to be an example of what I call “implicit whiteness”: White flight is one of the most salient phenomena of the late 20th century. And where are these white people fleeing to? To the suburbs where there are lots of other white people and where their children go to schools with other white children. As sociologist Kevin Kruse notes in his book White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism, race is never part of the explicit rhetoric of white flight. Instead, white flight tends to be expressed as opposition to the federal government, the welfare state, taxation, and perceived moral dangers like abortion and homosexuality. But at the implicit level, the desire for white communities and the aversion to contributing to public goods for nonwhites are the overriding motivations. Each of these identities allows white people to associate with other whites without any explicit acknowledgement that race plays a role. However, as one of the articles notes, blacks can be explicit about their preferences: Many higher-income African-Americans who could afford to live anywhere in the city choose to live among blacks, even at the expense of wealth accumulation in their homes. “It provides a certain comfort for middle-class African-Americans who may work in a corporate environment where they are minorities to live in a neighborhood where they aren’t a minority,” said Richard Pierce, chairman of the Africana studies department at the University of Notre Dame. [Rosalyn] Bates, of Bronzeville [a black neighborhood], might fit into that category. A clinical therapist, she and her attorney sister canvassed much of the city before selecting a neighborhood. “There is a comfort level being among people of your own race,” she said. “I don’t think that there was any intention of segregation behind that.”
The articles reflect the attitude that there is a moral imperative for whites to live in integrated neighborhoods, but it is entirely benign when blacks do it. It is similar to the immigration issue writ small: Massive non-white immigration is a moral imperative for Western societies, but other societies have no such obligation. Societies from Israel to Korea to Zimbabwe are free to preserve their people and culture. And they are intent on doing so.
But such attitudes among whites are cause for censure and endless handwringing by elites in the media and academic world. Whites are retreating to white enclaves where they can find a measure of psychological ease and comfort — except when they talk to the media. Permanent URL:http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Chicago.html 42
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:19 | # “A people which has no pride in the achievements of remote ancestry will never achieve anything worthy to be remembered by remote descendants.” http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3595.0 43
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:22 | # White People of Truth: The white race embodies a pronounced ability to establish flourishing accomplishments. We harbor the proficiency to create a thriving and prosperous civilization. However, it seems to be the way of nature that all great things are short lived. Though whites have the ability to create wonderful societies, we do not possess the cleverness to maintain them. For the ambitions and determination that exist in creating a prosperous society, largely erode as a consequence to the resulting ideals this prosperity inspires. In recent history we may observe that England, the United States, and Russia all have thrived as super powers. Within each of these countries is a society dominated by whites. Though their politics and system of government may vary, the resulting ideals that prosperity cultivates is ushering these once great societies into nihility. It appears to me that white Americans, and conservatives in particular, are ignoring the obvious. The America for whom you fly your flag, cover your heart with your hand, and refer to as “under God”, is now a relic of nostalgia. The America to which you are perceiving is a deceased white dominated society. One that held deep convictions and morals. One more concerned with family than prosperity. And one that existed prior to the 1960’s. The foundation of a culture is dependent on the concreteness of its families. How do you maintain a culture? By maintaining its values. How do you maintain values? By insuring the concreteness of the family. How do you safeguard the foundation of families? By insuring that children are raised by their biological mother and father. This union of a nuclear family is more important than all other ideals, it is superior to them. If a culture lacks the ability to maintain the nuclear family, it logically follows that it lacks the ability to maintain itself. It is with this premise that I discuss the end of white dominance. For we have lost the ability to maintain our families. In fact, our culture has digressed into a social disorder which despises all traditional values. We have a value system which declares nuclear families are a burden, an undesirable circumstance of last resort, just prior to death. And it was our search for prosperity that brought us to this point. By prosperity I not only mean financial prosperity. But also, the narcissistic ambition of pursuing ones hopes, dreams, and desires in spite of all others. America was a gift from God Whether you are spiritual or not, if there is a God, certainly America was his greatest blessing endowed upon the white race. The New World was an untamed wilderness where immigrants could radiate and conquer a free and unspoiled land. America was sheltered from the traditional clutches of tyranny and oppression which existed in the Old World. Because of this, mankind was able to fulfill a grand experiment in individual liberty and thereby create a governing body, which was instructed to safeguard individual rights at the expense of government. America was a land free of established Rulers. This presented our forefathers with an opportunity to live their lives as they saw fit, creating communities of good will, often without a formal legislative or law enforcement entity. It was here, in these humble communities, that the white race would produce the most honorable generations of courageous men and women. In the absence of governing bodies, organic culture flourished in the New World. Not surprisingly, armed with their spiritual faith, Europe’s poor and adventurous would construct their own ideals of justice, based largely on Christian principles. First and foremost, America was to be a land free of Kings and Dictators. No longer would a person’s esteem be based upon an adverse system of birthright or lineage. In America every individual was to be judged according to their own talents and integrity. America was capacious with hard labor, available land, and self reliance. But money was often nonexistent, in many communities it was replaced exclusively by a barter system. Thus man was forced to earn his property, without the legislative ability to confiscate his neighbor’s wealth nor to inscribe riches onto paper. In the absence of plunder, legislative piracy, and prosperity, generations of honest and noble men grew up in a more principled society where injustices were rare and atonement was swift. For many early American settlers, injustice through legislation had yet to be introduced. It would be this libertarian system of natural justice and self reliance, allied with spiritual faith, which would lead America to the crest of economic and societal grandeur. . . . The reason blacks grow more audacious with each passing day is because the white race is in a state of media mandated fear. We must all walk and talk as though we are on pins and needles for the very likely occurrence that our inbred racist demeanor will somehow shine through. Only the white race must comply with these rigorous new social standards. All other races are exempt. This is not justice or atonement, this is willing self induced discrimination. Blacks grow bolder and more frustrated with whites. Why is this so? Because a race of citizens who have lost the will to stand up for themselves will garner no respect from those who wish to inflict social and legislative injustice. This self induced fear is marching the white race into bondage within the very societies we created. Why do people of different races have such an arduous contest in efforts to co-exist? This environment is difficult because it goes against our inborn nature. Diversity is the very opposite of what the human mind desires. Society is built upon the ability of individuals to trust each other. Humans naturally trust other people who are similar in appearance, speech, and ideals. This is a natural phenomenon and should be acknowledged as such. To minimize these conditions, the law should not be used as an instrument of injustice, favoring one group at the expense of another. For as each group achieves political prowess, they each in turn strive to propagate unjust legislation onto their fellow citizens. But in America it was the whites who first came to power. Therefore it is the whites who laid the framework for converting the law into an instrument of injustice. The white’s desire for undeserved prosperity has guaranteed us generations of ever increasing plunder. What began as unjust enslavement and tariffs some 300 years ago, has lead to a corrupt system of government that is now felt within the most intimate areas of our lives. What Christians? Nearly 80% of Americans claim to be Christians. But this number is dropping rapidly and it should. Modern Christianity no longer knows what it stands for, despite it being printed in black and white right before our eyes. Much like America, Christians have opted to shed themselves of any moral credibility. Since values and moral condemnation drive away sinners, and thus dollars, damned lies from the pulpit now welcome all regardless of lifestyle. God is love. I believe that is the only sentence from the Bible that any American could recognize based on what is being preached in the majority of our churches. Christians have turned their backs on their religion in order to pursue prosperity. What we are witnessing today is a very diluted and perverted form of Christianity. Rather than committing themselves to God or their families, Americans are now committed to themselves and their personal pursuits of financial wealth. We have replaced the temple of God and family with the temple of financial prosperity and all the pursuits thereof. As America fell away from the teachings of the scriptures, her families and way of life would be torn apart. We have forsaken that which we know to be tried and true, in order to pursue a fabricated fantasy, which in the end; will lead to the complete destruction of America. In fact, I would already go so far as to say that America hasn’t existed in quite a few decades. Whatever America once stood for, it would now be unrecognizable to those forefathers which founded this government of the people. Commitment to God Commitment to Family Commitment to Country These were the commitments of an earlier generation of white Americans. These commitments have been corrupted by the pursuit of prosperity. Much of America’s white youth is turning to atheism. Why is this happening? America no longer has any form of organic culture. Our culture is now centered on the perception that the fruits of life are easily attainable, even if you refuse to work. In the absence of pain, struggles, suffering, and hard work, Americans have achieved such a level of prosperity that they no longer need God. Only in America could the poorest of society also be the most obese. Our society has embraced the ideal of ‘no consequences’. There will be no consequences for reckless sex and reckless spending. America will provide you with birth control, condoms, morning after pill, abortion, debt settlement, debt consolidation, and bankruptcy. Why would any American need God in a society which provides its citizens with such irresponsible lifestyles? You may believe that your atheism is simply an extension of your level of intelligence. But I can assure you, there are plenty of people out there that are smarter than you, who’ve devoted their lives to Christianity. Atheism is a projection of America’s new chapter of conventional wisdom called ethical relativism. That is, there is no such thing as absolute good and absolute evil, for these terms are ethically relative to preconceived notions based on someone’s opinion of morality. George Washington makes a statement in his farewell address that all should consider. Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. Destruction of the nuclear family How did America come to falter with such social chaos and disorder? We pursue sex outside of marriage. We refuse to stay married. We aren’t allowed to discipline our step children, and likewise our own children are the step children of another man. This man is incapable of disciplining your children, for they are not his. His are being raised by another man, who in turn cannot discipline them. And that’s just for the citizens who are trying to achieve a traditional family for the sake of doing what is decent and proper. The single most detrimental social change that destroyed our families was the addition of women to the pursuit of prosperity. As women began leaving the home in search of careers and dollars, our families began the slow process of eroding into a system of derangement where everyone is melancholy about their future. The woman’s place is in the home. Even though I am agnostic, I realize that the failure to apply this principle is the most obvious blunder leading to the disruption of the traditional nuclear family. And it is this driving force (women pursuing careers) that is single handedly commanding a halt to any future accomplishments the white race could have had. A people which has lost the desire to reproduce has already cultivated the seeds of its own destruction. And white cultures around the globe are not reproducing at replacement level. In each of these white cultures citizens have naively constructed a failing social hierarchy which takes its instructions from the desires of women. A society dominated by women will not stand. And America has become a society dominated by women and lawyers. By using the law to unjustly dictate to a man how his wealth and children will be divided, our legal system is further encouraging this disease. Once these societies used the courts to put women in positions of authority within the home, the catalyst for ruination was concealed within our families - and thus the damnation of our culture was materialized. Though we may have the ability to carry out which ever actions we desire, we do not harness the ability to command the consequences. http://debtprison.net/wordpress/112/the-end-of-white-tyranny/ 44
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:23 | # Our Anglo-Saxon Culture is gone: The Citizen.com - ?Apr 5, 2009? http://www.thecitizen.com/~citizen0/node/36039 Hence, the Nation envisioned by those Forefathers and written into our Constitution has failed. Culture is defined as the customary beliefs, social forms, mores & traits of a racial, religious or social group. Mores are the fixed morally binding customs of a particular group. There is nothing morally binding about our Anglo-Saxon heritage. America is a nation of different conflicting customs, mores, races, languages and morals, which divides us. As Lincoln said, “a house divided cannot stand”. Free enterprise is dead. Pres. Obama is now the CEO of the auto industry. The Congress is enacting laws giving power to the Government to decide how and who will run private businesses. The Banks, Wall Street, Republican & Democrats are all in bed together. The people are sheeple. Our leaders are unreasonable, irrational, immoral and destructive Democrats and Republicans, except Ron Paul. Conservatives and Anglo-Saxons have no leader. Georgia’s leaders are typical of all States. Our two Senators & Congressmen are quiet as mice. There is no vociferous leader of the sheeple. America’s elected representatives are in fact traitors to the Constitution. Judges ignore the Constitution and make law as they go. Same-Sex marriages, killing babies and total disregard for our Roman based laws is not Anglo-Saxon culture. Who will emerge as a true leader of Anglo-Saxon and Conservative America? Will it be a Civilian Sheeple who has finally awakened to our national tragedy, one who asks no quarter and gives none. Will it be a Military General who has to take over in a national emergency of chaos, riots and anarchy? Will it be a Dictatorial Demagogue who makes false claims and promises in order to gain power like Obama, Stalin, Mao or Hitler? Or will we have a Revolution of the Bourgeoisie as happened in 18th Century France; made up a disfranchised workers, land owners, small businesses and middle class professionals. Whatever road we take Obama was right about bringing change to America. For we are now in the first phase of the revolution. In France the immediate cause of the revolution was state finance in 1774, when Louis XVI appointed Jacques Turgot to reform the financial system. Does Obama’s appointment of Timothy Geithner as Treasury Secretary echo a familiarity? As US food prices continue to rise and shortages appear, will Lady Obama say, “let them eat cake”. In the 2nd phase of the French Revolution after the failure of the Finance Minister, the people, no longer sheeple, took over the Paris Government (Washington in our case) and the French guard joined in. After came Robespierre and the “reign of terror” in which those who were deemed responsible for governments’ failure were guillotined. Which way will America go in its 2nd phase? The Tea Parties have already begun. Has Napoleon been born? 45
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:25 | # HOMOGENEITY. ANGLO-SAXON COMMONWEALTH: “Why increase the Sons of Africa…where we have so fair an Opportunity…of increasing the lovely White and Red?” Benjamin Franklin, America as a Land of Opportunity (1751) As an example illustrating the fundamental argument asserting a legitimate ethnic interest in maintaining an ethnic status quo without claiming racial superiority, consider the following statement from Representative William N. Vaile of Colorado, one of the most prominent restrictionists: Let me emphasize here that the restrictionists of Congress do not claim that the “Nordic” race, or even the Anglo-Saxon race, is the best race in the world. Let us concede, in all fairness that the Czech is a more sturdy laborer, with a very low percentage of crime and insanity, that the Jew is the best businessman in the world, and that the Italian has a spiritual grasp and an artistic sense which have greatly enriched the world and which have, indeed, enriched us, a spiritual exaltation and an artistic creative sense which the Nordic rarely attains. Nordics need not be vain about their own qualifications. It well behooves them to be humble. What we do claim is that the northern European, and particularly Anglo-Saxons made this country. Oh, yes; the others helped. But that is the full statement of the case. They came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched it, but they did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it. We are determined that they shall not. It is a good country. It suits us. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done, we will do it ourselves. (Cong. Rec., April 8, 1924, 5922) ============================================================== In Praise of Homogeneity by Jared Taylor I have just returned from several weeks in Japan, and am again struck by the forceful example that country offers of the advantages of homogeneity. As the years go by, Japan’s steady record of successes stands in ever-greater contrast to America’s failures, and to its inability to think seriously about the kind of country it is becoming. Japan is not without problems, of course, and some are disconcerting by our standards. But the Japanese have a much better chance than we do of surviving into the next century as a coherent, prosperous nation with a culture and civilization it can unmistakably call its own. Japan is one of the most homogeneous countries on earth. Ethnic Japanese make up 98.5 percent of the population, followed by Koreans and Chinese at 0.5 and 0.4 percent. The largest non-Japanese populations are, therefore, from closely related races and are visually indistinguishable from the majority. Wherever you go in Japan, you are likely to see Japanese and only Japanese. Japan is at the same time a sound refutation of the view that homogeneity means dull uniformity. (This is the implication, of course, of the common assertion that immigrants have livened up the United States, saving it, presumably, from the suffocating sameness of whiteness.) Japan has as much variety — cultural, esthetic, culinary — as anyone could want. Whether it is clothing styles, amateur orchestras, motorcycle clubs, art exhibits, restaurants or museums, visitors are struck by the rich variety of Japanese life. There are endless ways to be Japanese. Thus, traditional Japanese instruments like the koto and shamisen have never been more popular, but Japan also produces internationally-known classical musicians. In addition to its own sports like sumo or judo, Japan has mastered baseball to the point that it sends Japanese stars to the major leagues. American orthodoxy about immigration and diversity suggests that a country could not have opera without a colony of Italians, or golf and Scotch whiskey without Scots. Japan proves that a country can open itself to what it considers the best foreign influences while shutting out foreign people. Japan therefore has first-rate opera without Italians, jazz without blacks, heavy metal without Brits and some of the best “Western” science and technology without Westerners. What Japan does not have is “honor killings,” voodoo, MS-13, bilingualism or racial tension, and it will never have these things if it keeps to its current no-immigration policy. We are told over and over that immigration is an inevitable consequence of world travel, of a shrinking globe, and that without big doses of foreigners a country cannot be truly international or participate in the global economy. Again, Japan proves this is nonsense. It is a full participant in everything from the G8 Conference of industrialized nations to Rotary International. It is a considerably more successful participant than the United States in the global economy, exporting 9.7 percent of its GDP versus 7.8 percent for us, and registering a trade surplus of $168 billion in 2006 as opposed to our staggering deficit of $836 billion. Anyone who told the Japanese they would improve their trade balance or understand the world better if they would only let in a million Puerto Ricans or Haitians would be politely escorted to the nut hatch. Japanese believe they are entirely capable of handling their affairs themselves. It is important to realize, however, that the fruits of homogeneity are profoundly different for the Japanese than they would be for, say, the Yoruba or the Cherokee, who could probably have been left homogeneous for centuries without emerging from the state in which Europeans found them (see next article). International testing has repeatedly shown that Japanese have a very high average IQ — three to five points above the European average — and any society they build will reflect this. But if homogeneity brings out a group’s most characteristic traits, what characterizes the Japanese? Japanese behave in many ways as they and other North Asians do in the United States. Japan has, for example, one of the lowest rates of violent crime in the world. The murder rate is approximately one tenth that of the United States (about 0.5 murders per 100,000) and the robbery rate is on the order of one 150th (about one per 100,000). Japanese, both in Japan and in the United States, have lower rates of violent crime even when compared only to white Americans, and although it is not easy to get accurate statistics, violent crime rates for Japanese are essentially the same whether they live in Japan, where there is very tight gun control, or in the US, where guns are plentiful. (Interestingly, of all the foreign groups living in Japan, Africans are the most crime prone, with rates considerably above the native Japanese rate. Europeans and Americans commit the least crime, with rates below native Japanese rates. Africans and whites resident in Japan are much better behaved than the averages for their groups back in their native countries, because Japan is careful about whom it lets in, even temporarily. This keeps crime rates for resident or transient whites — but not for blacks — lower even than the very low native Japanese rate. Even the tiny number of carefully selected blacks living in Japan are still the most crime-prone group in the country.) At the same time, Japanese police are good at solving the small number of violent crimes Japanese commit: 95 percent of murders and 75 percent of robberies, compared to 65 percent and 25 percent in the United States. Police do not have to worry about some groups refusing to cooperate with the police for fear of being called “snitches.” Japan has crime syndicates called yakuza, but they mainly run gambling, prostitution, and protection rackets. Yakuza touch ordinary people’s lives about as much as the cosa nostra touches ordinary Americans. http://www.amren.com/ar/2007/08/index.html#cover I have never met a Japanese who is shocked at the idea of racial differences in IQ, or who thinks blacks and Hispanics are good for America. No nation has yet learned how to revive flagging birthrates, so for the foreseeable future Japan’s population may be destined to shrink, but if any nation can figure out how to decline gracefully, it will be the Japanese. Black humorists like to calculate how many centuries it will take before Japan’s declining population will drop to zero—when the Japanese people finally go extinct—but Japan is determined to stay Japanese as long as it possibly can. I recently stumbled onto a one-man show of lacquer products made for the tea ceremony. The artist was there, and we fell into conversation. There was a corner of the gallery set aside for making the bitter, frothy, bright green tea for the ceremony, and he called for two servings. We turned the bowls the ritual three times in our hands to admire the workmanship—my host had made them, after all—and drank our tea. A smile played across the man’s face. “When I drink tea like this,” he said, “I can’t help but think how lucky I am to have been born Japanese.” It has probably never occurred to this man to wonder whether his great-grandchildren will be anything but pure-bred Japanese. I’m sure he is confident that whatever happens, his descendants—and his country—will be unmistakably his. He has every reason to be confident that many generations from now, his people will taste that bitter green tea and feel lucky they were born Japanese. 46
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:32 | # NATIONAL SOCIALISM (NAZISM): MIRROR-IMAGE OF JUDAISM: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3358.0 ——————————————————————————————————————————— National Socialism as an Anti-Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/books.htm http://www.euvolution.com/articles/chapt5.htm http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html ——————————————————————————————————————————- Hitler’s main idea—the fanatical worship of a jealous tribal god, at the bidding of a prophetic leader—is the original (though not ultimate) Leitmotiv of the Old Testament…. Gould, p. 454 Hitler appropriated for his Aryan Master Race the Hebrew notion of being a Chosen People, and then twisted it to his own megalomania, saying: “We [Aryans] are chosen ... [and] whoever proclaims his allegiance to me is, by this very proclamation and by the manner in which it is made, one of the chosen.” Katz, p. 9 Nazi racism was an attempt to reestablish a basis for community on shared archaic roots. The exclusion of the alien was intrinsic to its very nature. Richard L. Rubenstein, p. 110 The Nazi claim to chosenness could clash seriously only with the Jewish claim. Nazi leaders knew quite well that the Jews had divided the world, exactly as they had, into two halves—themselves and all the others. Hannah Arendt, p. 240 “It is true that the Bible is one of the greatest creations of human cultures. But it is equally true that it is full of inhuman motives and that, as Koestler stated, all the bases of the Nuremberg Laws can be found in it. If the segregatory laws of the Herrenrasse were barbarous, the segregatory laws of the Chosen People are equally barbarous.” Tamarin, Georges. The Israeli Dilemma. Essays on a Warfare State. Rotterdam University Press, Netherlands, 1973, p. 24 We cannot fail to recognize in the claim of Israelite superiority a kinship and resemblance to the similar claims of other national and racial groups which have been used in defense of the imperialist exploitation of the yellow and black man by the whites on the grounds that they were the ‘white man’s burden.’ They are the grounds for the German persecution of Jewry, in accord with the Aryan clause of the Third Reich’s fundamental law. They were in the past the grounds in which the Israelite people rationalized their conquest and expropriation of the Canaanites. All such claims to superiority of one race, nation, or caste are detrimental to the interests of humanity, and are essentially vicious. Kaplan, Mordecai. The Meaning of God in Modern Jewish Religion. The Jewish Reconstructionist Foundation, Inc., NY, NY, 1947, p. 94-95 Toynbee regards the biblical notion of a people, set apart from the rest of mankind, as the source of self-aggrandizement of Christian nations in the modern world. Ultimately, this narcissistic belief of the ancient Israelites took root in the minds of anti-Christian Germans, emerging as the Nazi madness of our own generation. Agus, Jacob B. Jewish Identity in an Age of Ideologies. Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., NY, 1978, p. 385. There is some truth in ‘enlightened’ assertions from Voltaire to Renan to Taine that the Israelite’s concept of chosenness, their identification of religion and nationality, their claim to an absolute position in history and a singled-out relationship with God, brought into Western civilization an otherwise unknown element of fanaticism (inherited by Christianity with its claim to exclusive possession of Truth) on one side, and on the other an element of pride that was dangerously close to its racial perversion. Hannah Arendt, p. 242 In South Africa the Afrikaner’s self-identification with the ancient Hebrews—with their own Great Trek regarded by them as a second Exodus, combines with their own explication of the biblical story of Ham as meaning that black Africans were divinely ordained to be their servants—formed the theologically legitimizing core of the reprehensible doctrine of apartheid. Thus, the covenantal belief of the Ulster-Scots in their self-defined status as one of God’s predestined ‘elect’ peoples has served to justify their occupation of the promised land of Northern Ireland along with their historical persecutions of that land’s native Irish people. And thus, on one occasion (among many) that the Puritan settlers of New England laid waste an entire neighboring nation with barely a pretext of provocation—shooting and stabbing to death every man, woman, and child that they could find—they wrote in justification that ‘sometimes the Scripture declareth women and children must perish with their parents,’ and notes that as Chosen People (alluding to Deuteronomy 20:16) the Lord had given them the Indian’s “land for an inheritance.” Stanndard, David. Uniqueness or Denial: The Politics of Genocide Scholarship. in Rosenbaum, p. 163-209. Oliver Cromwell’s Joshua-like campaign against the Catholics of Ireland in the seventeenth century, which led to bloody massacres of civilians, was inspired by the Bible. Carroll, Robert P. War, 1989, p. 147-170 [in Smith, Morton/Hoffman, R. Joseph. What the Bible Really Says]
=============================================================
The National Socialist movement in Germany from 1933-1945 is a departure from Western tendencies toward universalism and muted individualism in the direction of racial nationalism and cohesive collectivism. . . . National Socialism may be usefully conceptualized as a group evolutionary strategy that was characterized by several key features that mirrored Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy. . . . National Socialism and Judaism as Mirror-Image Group Strategies There is an eerie sense in which National Socialist ideology was a mirror image of traditional Jewish ideology. As in the case of Judaism, there was a strong emphasis on racial purity and on the primacy of group ethnic interests rather than individual interests. Like the Jews, the National Socialists were greatly concerned with eugenics. Like the Jews, there was a powerful concern with socializing group members into accepting group goals and with the importance of within-group altruism and cooperation in attaining these goals. Both groups had very powerful internal social controls that punished individuals who violated group goals or attempted to exploit the group by freeloading. The National Socialists enacted a broad range of measures against Jews as a group, including laws against intermarriage and sexual contact, as well as laws preventing socialization between groups and restricting the economic and political opportunities of Jews. These laws were analogous to the elaborate social controls within the Jewish community to prevent social contact with gentiles and to produce high levels of economic and political cooperation. Corresponding to the religious obligation to reproduce and multiply enshrined in the Tanakh, the National Socialists placed a strong emphasis on fertility and enacted laws that restricted abortion and discouraged birth control. In a manner analogous to the traditional Jewish religious obligation to provide dowries for poor girls, the National Socialists enacted laws that enabled needy young couples to marry by providing them loans repayable by having children. As in the society depicted in the Tanakh and throughout Jewish history, the National Socialists regarded people who could not prove the genetic purity of their ancestry as aliens with fewer rights than Germans, with the result that the position of Jews in National Socialist society was analogous to the position of the Nethinim or the Samaritans in ancient Israelite society, or converts in historical Jewish societies, or the Palestinians in contemporary Israel. As with Israel, the state had become the embodiment of an exclusivist ethnic group. . . . A critical component of official National Socialist ideology, as represented in the thought of Alfred Rosenberg, was the idea that “the twin forces of disintegration, namely universalism and individualism, act in perpetual conflict with the Germanic concept of race” (Cecil 1972, 89). In this regard, National Socialism was indeed profoundly anti-Western. In rejecting both universalism and individualism, National Socialism resembled, much more closely than did medieval Western collectivist Christianity, its mirror image rival, Judaism. Lack of Group-Based Competition as a Necessary Condition for Western Individualism While intra-societal conflict between Jews and gentiles tends to be associated with the development of anti-individualist Western societies, the absence of conflict between powerful and impermeable ethnic groups may be a necessary condition for the development of the relatively individualistic Western societies of the post-Enlightenment world. This proposal is highly congruent with the social identity perspective of group conflict: as societies become structured around competing groups, people form strong group allegiances incompatible with individualism. Such a society is incompatible with the notion of individual rights because group interests become paramount: Within the ingroup, individual rights and interests must be sharply curtailed in the interests of group cohesion and the attainment of group interests. The context of between-group competition results in group membership rather than individual behavior or merit becoming the most important criterion of personal assessment. A Manichean morality of ingroup favoritism and outgroup hostility develops that is completely incompatible with individualism. . . . The implication is that the Western tradition of muted individualism and its concomitant democratic and republican political institutions are unlikely to survive the escalation of intrasocietal group-based competition for resources that is such a prominent theme of contemporary American society. . . . My view, which I elaborate in The Culture of Critique, is that Western societies have a tendency to seek an equilibrium state of hierarchic harmony among the social classes in which there are powerful controls on extreme individualism among the elite classes. This tendency toward hierarchic harmony—a paradigmatic feature of the Christian Middle Ages—combined with assimilationism and individualism has been a powerful force in breaking down barriers within society. The difficulty for a group strategy like Judaism is that, if assimilation fails, the Western tendencies toward universalism and individualism are abandoned. From this perspective, it is no accident that the National Socialist theorist Alfred Rosenberg regarded the Western concepts of universalism and individualism as anathema: Both concepts were incompatible with National Socialism as a closed ethnic group strategy. It is in this sense that the individualist, universalist strands of Western culture are indeed incompatible with Judaism. http://www.euvolution.com/articles/chapt5.htm
The paradigm for such assimilative behavior is Alexander the Great’s intention of building a universalist state in which there would be complete genetic and cultural assimilation with the conquered peoples - the dream of a universal world-state based on universal brotherhood and partnership and on cooperation between conquerors and conquered (see Hegermann 1989). Alexander adopted many Persian cultural practices (e.g., type of dress and court ceremonies), and he married an Iranian princess and forced his men to do the same. In contrast, the whole point of historical Judaism has been to resist alien cultures. Moreover, Israelites who married foreign women in the period of conquest after the Exodus and in the resettlement after the Babylonian exile were condemned and excluded, and Joshua “destroyed all that breathed, as the LORD, the God of Israel, commanded” (Josh. 10:40).
47
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:34 | # The Jewish Tribal Review: http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/ WHEN VICTIMS RULE: A CRITIQUE OF JEWISH PRE-EMINENCE IN AMERICA: http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wvr.htm THE PAST: “Over representation in the economic elite of a visible ethnic minority of the degree found in Poland and Hungary was certain to cause trouble regardless of the identity of the group: if Belgians, Bulgarians, or Bolivians had constituted 62 per cent of the highest income-earners of Hungary, rather than Jews, that would certainly engendered resentment against them ... To us [Jews], European antisemitism appears to be a weapon of the strong against the weak, a kind of ideological sadism. To European right-wing nationalists of the post-1870 period, however, antisemitism appeared to be a weapon of the weak against the strong, an attempt (as they saw it) by a downtrodden nation to regain control over its resources from a separate, distinctive minority which appeared to dominate the economy—an aim not unlike that of anti-colonial movements in the Third World vis-a-vis the Europeans and foreign entrepreneurial minorities (like the Chinese throughout South-East Asia). The Zionist movement understood this perfectly well, however disturbing such a perspective may seem to us viewed with post-Holocaust eyes. Moreover, research is most likely to demonstrate a very considerable actual Jewish over-representation in many other social and political areas which figured largely in the litany of continental antisemitism of the post-1870 period, especially Jewish participation in the radical left, the liberal professions, in journalism, and in the media.” —W. D. Rubinstein, Jewish Journal of Sociology, Vol. 42, nos. 1 and 2, 2000, p. 18-19
Follow the blue “Open Book” button above, or click here ( http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/open.htm ) , to read the book When Victims Rule. A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America, a clearinghouse for information featuring over 10,000 citations from about 4,000 (scholarly and mainstream media) bibliographic sources. 48
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Mon, 11 May 2009 23:37 | # Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald (PDF) ——————————————————————————————— THE CULTURE OF CRITIQUE: http://www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf 49
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:16 | # WESTERN SURVIVAL: Emulating Key Elements of Judaism “JUDAIZATION” OF WESTERN SOCIETIES http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3292.0 Because the European-derived groups are less organized and less cohesive than Jews and because a therapeutic state has been erected to counter expressions of European-American ethnocentrism, it raises the distinct possibility that in the long run European Americans will be fragmented, politically powerless, and without an effective group identity at all. Given that a great many human cultures bear a strong resemblance to the collectivist, anti-assimilatory tendencies present in Middle Eastern culture, it is highly likely that many of our present immigrants are similarly unable or unwilling to accept the fundamental premises of a universalistic, culturally homogeneous, individualistic society. A fundamental agenda has been to make the European-derived peoples of the United States view concern about their own demographic and cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of psychopathology. If one accepts that both within-group and between-group genetic variation remains and is non-trivial (i.e., if evolution is an ongoing process), then the principle of relatively unrestricted immigration, at least under the conditions obtaining in late twentieth-century Western societies, clearly involves altruism by some individuals and established groups. Nevertheless, although the success of the intellectual movements reviewed in this volume is an indication that people can be induced to be altruistic toward other groups, I rather doubt such altruism will continue if there are obvious signs that the status and political power of European-derived groups is decreasing while the power of other groups increases. The prediction, both on theoretical grounds and on the basis of social identity research, is that as other groups become increasingly powerful and salient in a multicultural society, the European-derived peoples of the United States will become increasingly unified; among these peoples, contemporary divisive influences, such as issues related to gender and sexual orientation, social class differences, or religious differences, will be increasingly perceived as unimportant. Eventually these groups will develop a united front and a collectivist political orientation vis-a-vis the other ethnic groups. Other groups will be expelled if possible or partitions will be created, and Western societies will undergo another period of medievalism. The present tendencies lead one to predict that unless the ideology of individualism is abandoned not only by the multicultural minorities (who have been encouraged to pursue their group interests by a generation of American intellectuals) but also by the European-derived peoples of Europe, North America, New Zealand, and Australia, the end result will be a substantial diminution of the genetic, political, and cultural influence of these peoples. It would be an unprecedented unilateral abdication of such power and certainly an evolutionist would expect no such abdication without at least a phase of resistance by a significant segment of the population. As indicated above, European-derived peoples are expected to ultimately exhibit some of the great flexibility that Jews have shown throughout the ages in advocating particular political forms that best suit their current interests. The prediction is that segments of the European-derived peoples of the world will eventually realize that they have been ill-served and are being ill-served both by the ideology of multiculturalism and by the ideology of deethnicized individualism. It will be ironic that, whatever racialist rhetoric may be adopted by the leaders of these defensive movements, they will be constrained to emulate key elements of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy. Such strategic mimicry will, once again, lead to a “Judaization” of Western societies not only in the sense that their social organization will become more group-oriented but also in the sense that they will be more aware of themselves as a positively evaluated ingroup and more aware of other human groups as competing, negatively evaluated outgroups. 50
Posted by eu on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:18 | # Interesting similarities between this; “All such claims to superiority of one race, nation, or caste are detrimental to the interests of humanity, and are essentially vicious. Kaplan, Mordecai.” and this “Thus, the Herrenrasse considered themselves licenced to racially cleanse other peoples’ homelands and to press Jews and other Europeans into slave labour. Once you set foot upon the racial supremacist path you
51
Posted by a Finn on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:21 | # Happy Cracker: “8. The right of members of this nation to puts its preservation as foremost priority.” Nation is such a large and diffuse wholeness, represented by the state, that it is widely hierarchically organized and in the form; the state tells the citizen and citizen obeys and follows. Let’s start with the nationalistic state. Add a little time and the alienated distant “elite” of the state, compelled and stimulated by the international capitalism and international leftism, tells the citizen; “Immigration is good, multiculturalism is good, white is bad ...” Even with the help of genetic clusters the state and it’s nation are too much of a social construct. So you know what I would say about network of ethnic communities in comparison. 52
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:32 | # Barely perceptible on the horizon is an enigmatic, tough, well-armed warrior. He peers at America through slanted dark eyes set between high cheekbones. He understands parasites. He understands our pathology. He envies our long-limbed White women and our lebensraum. Almost imperceptibly he smiles. http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3057.0 53
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:36 | # “Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages. These two heritages determined that we have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined “not to be buried by either heaven or earth” no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national disasters. This is our advantage. ... Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.”Mr. Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission. http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3057.0 54
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:37 | # War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century Leading CCP official argues for exterminating U.S. population By Chi Haotian Aug 08, 2005 http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3057.0 The following is a transcript of a speech believed to have been given by Mr. Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission. Independently verifying the authorship of the speech is not possible. It is worth reading because it is believed to set out the CCP’s strategy for the development of China. The speech argues for the necessity of China using biological warfare to depopulate the United States and prepare it for a future massive Chinese colonization. “The War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century” was published on February 15, 2005 on http://www.peacehall.com and was published on http://www.boxun.com on April 23, 2005. This speech and a related speech, “The War Is Approaching Us” are analyzed in The Epoch Times original article “The CCP’s Last-ditch Gamble: Biological and Nuclear War.”
I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our Party’s cause will be carried on. In answering the question, “Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war,” more than 80 percent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations [1]. Today I’d like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time [2], during which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [3], mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic theme of “peace and development” had come to an end, and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for China’s next phase. I also mentioned we have a vital stake overseas. Today, I’ll speak more specifically on these two issues. The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese people’s attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even non-combatants, they’ll naturally be doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants. Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards war. Actually, however, this is not our genuine intention. The purpose of the CCP Central Committee in conducting this survey is to probe people’s minds. We wanted to know: If China’s global development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it? As everybody knows, the essence of Comrade Xiaoping’s [4] thinking is “development is the hard truth.” And Comrade Jintao [5] has also pointed out repeatedly and empathetically that “development is our top priority,” which should not be neglected for even a moment. But many comrades tend to understand “development” in its narrow sense, assuming it to be limited to domestic development. The fact is, our “development” refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes the whole world. Why do we put it this way? In discussing this issue, let us start from the beginning. As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by the Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single mother in Africa. Therefore, no race can claim racial superiority. However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. The Peking Man at Zhoukoudian that we are all familiar with represents a phase of our ancestors’ evolution. “The Project of Searching for the Origins of the Chinese Civilization” currently undertaken in our country is aimed at a more comprehensive and systematic research on the origin, process and development of the ancient Chinese civilization. We used to say, “Chinese civilization has had a history of five thousand years.” But now, many experts engaged in research in varied fields including archeology, ethnic cultures, and regional cultures have reached consensus that the new discoveries such as the Hongshan Culture in the Northeast, the Liangzhu Culture in Zhejiang province, the Jinsha Ruins in Sichuan province, and the Yongzhou Shun Emperor Cultural Site in Human province are all compelling evidence of the existence of China’s early civilizations, and they prove that China’s rice-growing agricultural history alone can be traced back as far as 8,000 to 10,000 years. This refutes the concept of “five thousand years of Chinese civilization.” Therefore, we can assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million years, civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself, “descendents of Yan and Huang,” the Chinese nation that we are so proud of. Hitler’s Germany had once bragged that the German race was the most superior race on Earth, but the fact is, our nation is far superior to the Germans. During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific. We all know that on account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the center of the world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours. Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the center of the world shifted to the West. In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the center of the world civilization shift back to China? Comrade He Xin put it in his report to the Central Committee in 1988: If the fact is that the center of leadership of the world was located in Europe as of the 18th Century, and later shifted to the United States in the mid 20th Century, then in the 21st Century the center of leadership of the world will shift to the East of our planet. And, “the East” of course mainly refers to China. Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing made similar points in early 1980s. Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the center of world civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th Century as the British Century, and the 20th century as the American Century, then the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century. To understand conscientiously this historical law and to be prepared to greet the advent of the Chinese Century is the historical mission of our Party. As we all know, at the end of the last century, we built the Altar to the Chinese Century in Beijing. At the very moment of the arrival of the new millennium, the collective leadership of the Party Central Committee gathered there for a rally, upholding the torches of Zhoukoudian, to pledge themselves to get ready to greet the arrival of the Chinese Century. We were doing this to follow the historical law and setting the realization of the Chinese Century as the goal of our Party’s endeavors. Later, in the political report of our Party’s Sixteenth National Congress, we established that the national revitalization be our great objective and explicitly specified in our new Party Constitution that our Party is the pioneer of the Chinese people. All these steps marked a major development in Marxism, reflecting our Party‘s courage and wisdom. As we all know, Marx and his followers have never referred to any communist party as a pioneer of a certain people; neither did they say that national revitalization could be used as a slogan of a communist party. Even Comrade Mao Zedong, a courageous national hero, only raised high the banner of “the global proletarian revolution,” but even he did not have the courage to give the loudest publicity to the slogan of national revitalization. We must greet the arrival of the Chinese Century by raising high the banner of national revitalization. How should we fight for the realization of the Chinese Century? We must borrow the precious experiences in human history by taking advantage of the outstanding fruition of human civilization and drawing lessons from what happened to other ethnic groups. The lessons include the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, as well as the defeats of Germany and Japan in the past. Recently there has been much discussion on the lessons of the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern European countries, so I will not dwell on them here. Today I’d like to talk about the lessons of Germany and Japan. As we all know, Nazi Germany also placed much emphasis on the education of the people, especially the younger generation. The Nazi party and government organized and established various propaganda and educational institutions such as the “Guiding Bureau of National Propaganda,” “Department of National Education and Propaganda,” “Supervising Bureau of Worldview Study and Education,” and “Information Office,” all aimed at instilling into the people’s minds, from elementary schools to colleges, the idea that German people are superior, and convincing people that the historical mission of the Arian people is to become the “lords of earth” that “rule over the world.” Back then the German people were much more united than we are today. Nonetheless, Germany was defeated in utter shame, along with its ally, Japan. Why? We reached some conclusions at the study meetings of the Politburo, in which we were searching for the laws that governed the vicissitudes of the big powers, and trying to analyze Germany and Japan’s rapid growth. When we decide to revitalize China based on the German model, we must not repeat the mistakes they made. Specifically, the following are the fundamental causes for their defeat: First, they had too many enemies all at once, as they did not adhere to the principle of eliminating enemies one at a time; second, they were too impetuous, lacking the patience and perseverance required for great accomplishments; third, when the time came for them to be ruthless, they turned out to be too soft, therefore leaving troubles that resurfaced later on. Let’s presume that back then Germany and Japan had been able to keep the United States neutral and had fought a protracted war step by step on the Soviet front. If they had adopted this approach, gained some time to advance their research, eventually succeeded in obtaining the technology of nuclear weapons and missiles, and launched surprise attacks against the United States and the Soviet Union using them, then the United States and the Soviet Union would not have been able to defend themselves and would have had to surrender. Little Japan, in particular, made an egregious mistake in launching the sneak strike at Pearl Harbor. This attack did not hit the vital parts of the United States. Instead it dragged the United States into the war, into the ranks of the gravediggers that eventually buried the German and Japanese fascists. Of course, if they had not made these three mistakes and won the war, history would have been written in a different fashion. If that had been the case, China would not be in our hands. Japan might have relocated their capital to China and ruled over China. Afterwards, China and the whole of Asia under Japan’s command would have brought into full play the oriental wisdom, conquered the West ruled by Germany and unified the whole world. This is irrelevant, of course. No more digressions. So, the fundamental reason for the defeats of Germany and Japan is that history did not arrange them to be the “lords of the earth,” for they are, after all, not the most superior race. Ostensibly, in comparison, today’s China is alarmingly similar to Germany back then. Both of them regard themselves as the most superior races; both of them have a history of being exploited by foreign powers and are therefore vindictive; both of them have the tradition of worshipping their own authorities; both of them feel that they have seriously insufficient living space; both of them raise high the two banners of nationalism and socialism and label themselves as “national socialism”; both of them worship “one state, one party, one leader, and one doctrine.” And yet, if we really are to make a comparison between Germany and China, then, as Comrade Jiang Zemin put it, Germany belongs to “pediatrics”—too trivial to be compared. How large is Germany’s population? How big is its territory? And how long is its history? We eliminated eight million Nationalist troops in only three years. How many enemies did Germany kill? They were in power for a transient period of little more than a dozen years before they perished, while we are still energetic after being around for more than eighty years. Our theory of the shifting center of civilization is of course more profound than the Hitler’s theory of “the lords of the earth.” Our civilization is profound and broad, which has determined that we are so much wiser than they were. http://en.epochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html
55
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:39 | # http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3057.0 Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission: One time, some Americans came to visit and tried to convince us that the relationship between China and United States is one of interdependence. Comrade Xiaoping replied in a polite manner: “Go tell your government, China and the United States do not have such a relationship that is interdependent and mutually reliant.” Actually, Comrade Xiaoping was being too polite, he could have been more frank, “The relationship between China and United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.” Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology, we still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our country. How have we managed our foreign affairs in these years? Even if we had to put on a smiling face in order to please them, even if we had to give them the right cheek after they had hit our left cheek, we still must endure in order to further our relationship with the United States. Do you remember the character of Wuxun in the movie the “Story of Wuxun”? In order to accomplish his mission, he endured so much pain and suffered so much beating and kicking! The United States is the most successful country in the world today. Only after we have learned all of its useful experiences can we replace it in the future. Even though we are presently imitating the American tone “China and United States rely on each other and share honor and disgrace,” we must not forget that the history of our civilization repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two tigers to live together. We also must never forget what Comrade Xiaoping emphasized “refrain from revealing the ambitions and put others off the track.” The hidden message is: we must put up with America; we must conceal our ultimate goals, hide our capabilities and await the opportunity. In this way, our mind is clear. Why have we not updated our national anthem with something peaceful? Why did we not change the anthem’s theme of war? Instead, when revising the Constitution this time, for the first time we clearly specified “March of the Volunteers” is our national anthem. Thus we will understand why we constantly talk loudly about the “Taiwan issue” but not the “American issue.” We all know the principle of “doing one thing under the cover of another.” If ordinary people can only see the small island of Taiwan in their eyes, then you as the elite of our country should be able to see the whole picture of our cause. Over these years, according to Comrade Xiaoping’s arrangement, a large piece of our territory in the North has been given up to Russia; do you really think our Party Central Committee is a fool? To resolve the issue of America we must be able to transcend conventions and restrictions. In history, when a country defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the people in the conquered land, because back then you could not kill people effectively with sabers or long spears, or even with rifles or machine guns. Therefore, it was impossible to gain a stretch of land without keeping the people on that land. However, if we conquered America in this fashion, we would not be able to make many people migrate there. Only by using special means to “clean up” America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not. What kind of special means is there available for us to “clean up” America? Conventional weapons such as fighters, canons, missiles and battleships won’t do; neither will highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issue resolved at whatever cost. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of “cleaning up” America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focus instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country. From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave half of the United States to be China’s colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means to “clean up” America, and reserve America for our use in a moment. Our historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in the world can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us. Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place. According to the computation of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who knows how soon it will come, the great collapse will occur any time and more than half of the population will have to go. We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack [on the United States], the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air defense systems for our big and medium-sized cities. Whatever the case may be, we can only move forward fearlessly for the sake of our Party and state and our nation’s future, regardless of the hardships we have to face and the sacrifices we have to make. The population, even if more than half dies, can be reproduced. But if the Party falls, everything is gone, and forever gone! In Chinese history, in the replacement of dynasties, the ruthless have always won and the benevolent have always failed. The most typical example involved Xiang Yu the King of Chu, who, after defeating Liu Bang, failed to continue to chase after him and eliminate his forces, and this leniency resulted in Xiang Yu’s death and Liu’s victory (during the war between Chu and Han, just after the Qin Dynasty (221-206BC) was overthrown). Therefore, we must emphasize the importance of adopting resolute measures. In the future, the two rivals, China and the United States, will eventually meet each other in a narrow road, and our leniency to the Americans will mean cruelty toward the Chinese people. Here some people may want to ask me: what about the several millions of our compatriots in the United States? They may ask: aren’t we against Chinese killing other Chinese? These comrades are too pedantic; they are not pragmatic enough. If we had insisted on the principle that the Chinese should not kill other Chinese, would we have liberated China? As for the several million Chinese living in the United States, this is of course a big issue. Therefore in recent years, we have been conducting research on genetic weapons, i.e. those weapons that do not kill yellow people. But producing a result with this kind of research is extremely difficult. Of the research done on genetic weapons throughout the world, the Israeli’s is the most advanced. Their genetic weapons are designed to target Arabs and protect the Israelis. But even they have not reached the stage of actual deployment. We have cooperated with Israel on some research. Perhaps we can introduce some of the technologies used to protect Israelis and remold these technologies to protect the yellow people. But their technologies are not mature yet, and it is difficult for us to surpass them in a few years. If it has to be five or ten years before some breakthroughs can be achieved in genetic weapons, we cannot afford to wait any longer. Old comrades like us cannot afford to wait that long, for we don’t have that much time to live. Old soldiers of my age may be able to wait for five or ten more years, but those from the period of the Anti-Japanese War or the few old Red Army soldiers cannot wait any longer. Therefore we have to give up our expectations about genetic weapons. Of course, from another perspective, the majority of those Chinese living in the United States have become our burden, because they have been corrupted by the bourgeois liberal values for a long time and it would be difficult for them to accept our Party’s leadership. If they survived the war, we would have to launch campaigns in the future to deal with them, to reform them. Do you still remember that when we had just defeated the Koumintang (KMT) and liberated Mainland China, so many people from the bourgeois class and intellectuals welcomed us so very warmly, but later we had to launch campaigns such as the “suppression of the reactionaries” and “Anti-Rightist Movement” to clean them up and reform them? Some of them were in hiding for a long time and were not exposed until the Cultural Revolution. History has proved that any social turmoil is likely to involve many deaths. Maybe we can put it this way: death is the engine that moves history forward. During the period of Three Kingdoms [9], how many people died? When Genghis Khan conquered Eurasia, how many people died? When Manchu invaded the interior of China, how many people died? Not many people died during the 1911 Revolution, but when we overthrew the Three Great Mountains [10], and during the political campaigns such as “Suppression of reactionaries,” “Three-Anti Campaign,” and “Five-Anti Campaign” at least 20 million people died. We were apprehensive that some young people today would be trembling with fear when they hear about wars or people dying. During wartime, we were used to seeing dead people. Blood and flesh were flying everywhere, corpses were lying in heaps on the fields, and blood ran like rivers. We saw it all. On the battlefields, everybody’s eyes turned red with killing because it was a life-and-death struggle and only the brave would survive. 56
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:44 | # http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3057.0 Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission: http://en.epochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages. These two heritages determined that we have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been able to prosper for so long. We are destined “not to be buried by either heaven or earth” no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national disasters. This is our advantage. Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, they enemies would have already reached Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial things. Comrade Deng Xiaoping once said, “The Party’s leadership is prompt in making decisions. Once a decision is made, it is immediately implemented. There’s no wasting time on trivial things like in capitalist countries. This is our advantage.” Our Party’s democratic centralism is built on the tradition of great unity. Although fascist Germany also stressed high-level centralism, they only focused on the power of the country’s executive, but ignored the collective leadership of the central group. That’s why Hitler was betrayed by many later in his life, which fundamentally depleted the Nazis of their war capacity. What makes us different from Germany is that we are complete atheists, while Germany was primarily a Catholic and Protestant country. Hitler was only half atheist. Although Hitler also believed that ordinary citizens had low intelligence, and that leaders should therefore make decisions, and although German people worshipped Hitler back then, Germany did not have the tradition of worshipping sages on a broad basis. Our Chinese society has always worshipped sages, and that is because we don’t worship any god. Once you worship a god, you can’t worship a person at the same time, unless you recognize the person as the god’s representative like they do in Middle Eastern countries. On the other hand, once you recognize a person as a sage, of course you will want him to be your leader, instead of monitoring and choosing him. This is the foundation of our democratic centralism. The bottom line is, only China, not Germany, is a reliable force in resisting the Western parliament-based democratic system. Hitler’s dictatorship in Germany was perhaps but a momentary mistake in history. Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us? If the common people don’t believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader, question his authority, and want to monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why we are leading God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China? Germany’s dream to be the “lord of the earth” failed, because ultimately, history did not bestow this great mission upon them. But the three lessons Germany learned from experience are what we ought to remember as we complete our historic mission and revitalize our race. The three lessons are: Firmly grasp the country’s living space, firmly grasp the Party’s control over the nation, and firmly grasp the general direction toward becoming the “lord of the earth.” Next, I’d like to address these three issues. Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests alongside the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered with a layer of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even our ground water is so polluted that it can’t be drunk without filtering. They have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a small residential building; in contrast, our streets are always crawling with people, and several people have to share one room. Many years ago, there was a book titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the American style of consumption, our limited resources would no longer support the population and society would collapse, once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to sustain our nation. It’s not that we haven’t paid attention to this issue. The Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue. But the term “living space” (lebensraum) is too closely related to Nazi Germany. The reason we don’t want to discuss this too openly is to avoid the West’s association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin’s new theory, “Human rights are just living rights,” we only talk about “living,” but not “space,” so as to avoid using the term “living space.” From the perspective of history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because Western countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people outside of China, so that they could develop outside of China. The second issue is our focus on the leadership capacity of the ruling party. We’ve done better on this than their party. Although the Nazis spread their power to every aspect of the German national government, they did not stress their absolute leadership position like we have. They did not take the issue of managing the power of the party as first priority, which we have. When Comrade Mao Zedong summarized the “three treasures” of our party’s victory in conquering the country, he considered the most important “treasure” to be developing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and strengthening its leadership position. We have to focus on two points to fortify our leadership position and improve our leadership capacity. The first is to promote the “Three Represents” theory [8], stressing that our Party is the pioneer of the Chinese race, in addition to being the pioneer of the proletariat. Many citizens say in private, “We never voted for you, the Communist Party, to represent us. How can you claim to be our representatives?” There’s no need to worry about this issue. Comrade Mao Zedong said that if we could lead our allies to victory and make them benefit, they would support us. Therefore, as long as we can lead the Chinese people outside of China, resolving the lack of living space in China, the Chinese people will support us. At that time, we don’t have to worry about the labels of “totalitarianism” or “dictatorship.” Whether we can forever represent the Chinese people depends on whether we can succeed in leading the Chinese people out of China. The second point, whether we can lead the Chinese people out of China, is the most important determinant of the CCP’s leadership position. Why do I say this? Everyone knows that without the leadership of our Party, China would not exist today. Therefore, our highest principle is to forever protect our Party’s leadership position. Before June 4, we realized vaguely that as long as China’s economy is developed, people would support and love the Communist Party. Therefore we had to use several decades of peacetime to develop China’s economy. No matter what -isms, whether it is a white cat or a black cat, it is a good cat if it can develop China’s economy. But at that time, we did not have mature ideas about how China would deal with international disputes after its economy is developed. Comrade Xiaoping said then that the main themes in the world were peace and development. But the June 4 riot gave our Party a warning and gave us a lesson that is still fresh. The pressure of China’s peaceful evolution makes us reconsider the main themes of our time. We see that neither of these two issues, peace and development, have been resolved. The western oppositional forces always change the world according to their own visions; they want to change China and use peaceful evolution to overturn the leadership of our Communist Party. Therefore, if we only develop the economy, we still face the possibility of losing control. That June 4 riot almost succeeded in bringing a peaceful transition; if it were not for the fact that a large number of veteran comrades were still alive and at a crucial moment they removed Zhao Ziyang and his followers, then we all would have been put in prison. After death we would have been too ashamed to report to Marx. Although we have passed the test of June 4, after our group of senior comrades pass away, without our control, peaceful evolution may still come to China like it did to the former Soviet Union. In 1956, they suppressed the Hungarian Incident and defeated the attacks by Tito’s revisionists of Yugoslavia, but they could not withstand Gorbachev thirty some years later. Once those pioneering senior comrades died, the power of the Communist Party was taken away by peaceful evolution. After the June 4 riot was suppressed, we have been thinking about how to prevent China from peaceful evolution and how to maintain the Communist Party’s leadership. We thought it over and over but did not come up with any good ideas. If we do not have good ideas, China will inevitably change peacefully, and we will all become criminals in history. After some deep pondering, we finally come to this conclusion: Only by turning our developed national strength into the force of a fist striking outward—only by leading people to go out —can we win forever the Chinese people’s support and love for the Communist Party. Our Party will then stand on invincible ground, and the Chinese people will have to depend on the Communist Party. They will forever follow the Communist Party with their hearts and minds, as was written in a couplet frequently seen in the countryside some years ago: “Listen to Chairman Mao, Follow the Communist Party!” Therefore, the June 4 riot made us realize that we must combine economic development with preparation for war and leading the people to go out! Therefore, since then, our national defense policy has taken a 180 degree turn and we have since emphasized more and more “combining peace and war.” Our economic development is all about preparing for the need of war! Publicly we still emphasize economic development as our center, but in reality, economic development has war as its center! We have made a tremendous effort to construct “The Great Wall Project” to build up, along our coastal and land frontiers as well as around large and medium-sized cities, a solid underground “Great Wall” that can withstand a nuclear war. We are also storing all necessary war materials. Therefore, we will not hesitate to fight a Third World War, so as to lead the people to go out and to ensure the Party’s leadership position. In any event, we, the CCP, will never step down from the stage of history! We’d rather have the whole world, or even the entire globe, share life and death with us than step down from the stage of history!!! Isn’t there a ‘nuclear bondage’ theory? It means that since nuclear weapons have bound the security of the entire world, all will die together if death is inevitable. In my view, there is another kind of bondage, and that is, the fate our Party is tied up with that of the whole world. If we, the CCP, are finished, China will be finished, and the world will be finished. 57
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:45 | # Our Party’s historical mission is to lead the Chinese people to go out. If we take the long view, we will see that history led us on this path. First, China’s long history has resulted in the world’s largest population, including Chinese in China as well as overseas. Second, once we open our doors, the profit-seeking western capitalists will invest capital and technology in China to assist our development, so that they can occupy the biggest market in the world. Third, our numerous overseas Chinese help us create the most favorable environment for the introduction of foreign capital, foreign technology and advanced experience into China. Thus, it is guaranteed that our reform and open-door policy will achieve tremendous success. Fourth, China’s great economic expansion will inevitably lead to the shrinkage of per-capita living space for the Chinese people, and this will encourage China to turn outward in search for new living space. Fifth, China’s great economic expansion will inevitably come with a significant development in our military forces, creating conditions for our expansion overseas. Even since Napoleon’s time, the West has been has been alert for the possible awakening of the sleeping lion that is China. Now, the sleeping lion is standing up and advancing into the world, and has become unstoppable! What is the third issue we should clinch firmly in order to accomplish our historical mission of national renaissance? It is to hold firmly onto the big “issue of America.” Comrade Mao Zedong taught us that we must have a resolute and correct political orientation. What is our key, correct orientation? It is to solve the issue of America. This appears to be shocking, but the logic is actually very simple. Comrade He Xin put forward a very fundamental judgment that is very reasonable. He asserted in his report to the Party Central Committee: The renaissance of China is in fundamental conflict with the western strategic interest, and therefore will inevitably be obstructed by the western countries doing everything they can. So, only by breaking the blockade formed by the western countries headed by the United States can China grow and move towards the world! Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization. Therefore, solving the “issue of America” is the key to solving all other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the white race. We the descendents of the Chinese nation are entitled to the possession of the land! It is said that the residents of the yellow race have a very low social status in United States. We need to liberate them. Second, after solving the “issue of America,” the western countries in Europe would bow to us, not to mention to Taiwan, Japan and other small countries. Therefore, solving the “issue of America” is the mission assigned to CCP members by history. I sometimes think how cruel it is for China and the United States to be enemies that are bound to meet on a narrow road! Do you remember a movie about Liberation Army troops led by Liu Bocheng and Deng Xiaoping? The title is something like “Decisive Battle on the Central Plains.” There is a famous remark in the movie that is full of power and grandeur: “The enemies are bound to meet on a narrow road, only the brave will win!” It is this kind of fighting to win or die spirit that enabled us to seize power in Mainland China. It is historical destiny that China and United States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight each other! The United States, unlike Russia and Japan, has never occupied and hurt China, and also assisted China in its battle against the Japanese. But, it will certainly be an obstruction, and the biggest obstruction! In the long run, the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle. 58
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:46 | # http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3057.0 Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission: It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths. But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we’d have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party. That is because, after all, we are Chinese and members of the CCP. Since the day we joined the CCP, the Party’s life has always been above all else! History will prove that we made the right choice. Now, when I am about to finish my speech, you probably understand why we conducted this online survey. Simply put, through conducting this online survey we wanted to know whether the people would rise against us if one day we secretly adopt resolute means to “clean up” America. Would more people support us or oppose us? This is our basic judgment: if our people approve of shooting at prisoners of war, women and children, then they would approve our “cleaning up” America. For over twenty years, China has been enjoying peace, and a whole generation has not been tested by war. In particular, since the end of World War II, there have been many changes in the formats of war, the concept of war and the ethics of war. Especially since the collapse of the former Soviet Union and Eastern European Communist states, the ideology of the West has come to dominate the world as a whole, and the Western theory of human nature and Western view of human rights have increasingly disseminated among the young people in China. Therefore, we were not very sure about the people’s attitude. If our people are fundamentally opposed to “cleaning up” America, we will, of course, have to adopt corresponding measures. Why didn’t we conduct the survey through administrative means instead of through the web? We did what we did for a good reason. First of all, we did it to reduce artificial inference and to make sure that we got the true thoughts of the people. In addition, it is more confidential and won’t reveal the true purpose of our survey. But what is most important is the fact that most of the people who are able to respond to the questions online are from social groups that are relatively well-educated and intelligent. They are the hard-core and leading groups that play a decisive role among our people. If they support us, then the people as a whole will follow us; if they oppose us, they will play the dangerous role of inciting people and creating social disturbance. What turned out to be very comforting is they did not turn in a blank test paper. In fact, they turned in a test paper with a score of over 80. This is the excellent fruition of our Party’s work in propaganda and education over the past few decades. Of course, a few people under the Western influence have objected to shooting at prisoners of war and women and children. Some of them said, “It is shocking and scary to witness so many people approving of shooting at women and children. Is everybody crazy?” Some others said, “The Chinese love to label themselves as a peace-loving people, but actually they are the most ruthless people. The comments are resonant of killing and murdering, sending chills to my heart.” Although there are not too many people holding this kind of viewpoint and they will not affect the overall situation in any significant way, but we still need to strengthen the propaganda to respond to this kind of argument. That is to vigorously propagate Comrade He Xin’s latest article, which has already been reported to the central government. You may look it up on the website. If you get on the website using key words to search, you will find out that a while ago, comrade He Xin pointed out to the Hong Kong Business News during an interview that: “The US has a shocking conspiracy.” According to what he had in hand, from September 27 to October 1, 1995, the Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachëv Foundation, funded by the United States, gathered 500 of the world’s most important statesmen, economic leaders and scientists, including George W. Bush (he was not the US president at the time), the Baroness Thatcher, Tony Blair, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as well as George Soros, Bill Gates, futurist John Naisbitt, etc., all of the world’s most popular characters, in the San Francisco Fairmont hotel for a high-level round table conference, discussing problems about globalization and how to guide humanity to move forward into the 21st century. According to what He Xin had in hand, the outstanding people of the world in attendance thought that in the 21st century a mere 20% of the world’s population will be sufficient to maintain the world’s economy and prosperity, the other 80% or 4/5 of the world’s population will be human garbage unable to produce new values. The people in attendance thought that this excess 80% population would be a trash population and “high-tech” means should be used to eliminate them gradually. Since the enemies are secretly planning to eliminate our population, we certainly cannot be infinitely merciful and compassionate to them. Comrade He Xin’s article came out at the right time, it has proven the correctness of our tit for tat battle approach, has proven Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s great foresight to deploy against the United States military strategy. Certainly, in spreading Comrade He Xin’s views, we cannot publish the article in the party newspapers, in order to avoid raising the enemy’s vigilance. He Xin’s conversation may remind the enemy that we have grasped the modern science and technology, including “clean” nuclear technology, gene weapons technology as well as biological weapons technology, and we can use powerful measures to eliminate their population on a large-scale. The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for military battle. Currently, we are at the cross road of moving forward or backward. Some comrades saw problems flooding everywhere in our country—the corruption problem, the state-owned enterprise problem, the bank’s bad accounts problem, environmental problems, society security problems, education problems, the AIDS problem, various appeals problem, even the riots problem. These comrades vacillated in the determination to prepare for the military battle. They thought; they should first grab the political reform problem, that is, our own political reform comes first. After resolving the domestic problems, we can then deal with the foreign military battle problem. This reminds me of the crucial period in 1948 in the Chinese revolution. At that time, the People’s Liberation Army’s “horses were drinking water” in Yangtze River, but they faced extremely complex situations and difficult problems everywhere in the liberated areas, and the central authority received emergency reports daily. What to do? Should we stop to manage rear areas and internal matters first before moving forward, or press on to pass the Yangtze River with one vigorous effort? Chairman Mao, with his extraordinary wisdom and mettle, gave the marching order “Carry on the revolution to the end,” and liberated all of China. The previously thought “serious” conflicting problems were all resolved in this great forward moving revolutionary wave. Now, it seems like we are in the same critical period as the “horses were drinking water” in the Yangtze River days in the revolutionary era, as long as we firmly seize the most basic principle of preparing for the military battle. The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved. Therefore, our military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan, but in fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparation is far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites. Marxism pointed out that violence is the midwife for the birth of the new society. Therefore war is the midwife for the birth of China’s century. As war approaches, I am full of hope for our next generation.
[1] Sina.com is one of the largest on-line media corporations in China. The on-line survey was launched by sina.com’s branch Sina Military (jczs.sina.com.cn). It started on February 2 and ended on March 1, 2004 and there were 31,872 persons who filled out the survey. The web page for this on-line survey is at “http://jczs.sina.com.cn/2004-02-02/1644180066.html” but this page has been removed and cannot be viewed. The question was “If you are a solider, and if are under the orders of your commanding officers, will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war?” 34% of the visitors answered they would shoot under any circumstances even without permission from their commanding officer. 48.6% of the visitors replied that they would shoot when the lives of themselves or their companies are threatened. Only 3.8% of the participants held they would not shoot under any circumstances. Those who agreed to shoot were mostly under the age of 25. [2] “War Is Approaching Us” [3] “Three islands” refer to Taiwan, Diaoyu Islands, and Spratly Islands. [4] Deng Xiaoping (1904-1997). Officially, Deng was the leader of the CCP and China from 1978-89. Actually, after Mao’s death in 1976 Deng became the de facto leader of China until Deng finally died in 1997. [5] Hu Jintao (1942-). Leader of the “fourth generation” of CCP officials. In 2003, Hu became President of the People’s Republic of China. [6] Liu Huaqing (1916-). Commander of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy from 1982 through 1988, vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission (until 1997). Liu is considered to be responsible for the PLA’s modernization efforts. [7] He Xin (1949-). Senior Fellow of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. [8] “Three Represents” states that the CCP represents the requirement to develop advanced productive forces, an orientation towards advanced culture, and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the people in China. It was put forward by Jiang Zemin, former Chinese president. [9] Three Kingdoms refer to Wei, Shu, and Wu, three countries that overlapped the land of China during the period A.D. 220-80. [10] “Three great mountains” were said according to the CCP to have weighed on the backs of the Chinese people—imperialism, feudalism and bureaucratic-capitalism. The original Chinese article is available at: http://epochtimes.com/gb/5/8/1/n1003911.htm 59
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 00:49 | # Barely perceptible on the horizon is an enigmatic, tough, well-armed warrior. He peers at America through slanted dark eyes set between high cheekbones. He understands parasites. He understands our pathology. He envies our long-limbed White women and our lebensraum. Almost imperceptibly he smiles. EMINENT DOMAIN: THE CHINESE ARE AFTER YOUR LAND AND WOMEN: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3057.0 http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3050.0 —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— Chi Haotian: The fact is, our “development” refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes the whole world…Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the center of world civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th Century as the British Century, and the 20th century as the American Century, then the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century. To understand conscientiously this historical law and to be prepared to greet the advent of the Chinese Century is the historical mission of our Party…Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area…The first issue is living space. This is the biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race…Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is much better than ours… What is our key, correct orientation? It is to solve the issue of America…Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization. Therefore, solving the “issue of America” is the key to solving all other issues. First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the white race. We the descendents of the Chinese nation are entitled to the possession of the land! It is said that the residents of the yellow race have a very low social status in United States. We need to liberate them. Second, after solving the “issue of America,” the western countries in Europe would bow to us, not to mention to Taiwan, Japan and other small countries. Therefore, solving the “issue of America” is the mission assigned to CCP members by history… It is historical destiny that China and United States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight each other! ... In the long run, the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle…In history, when a country defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the people in the conquered land, because back then you could not kill people effectively with sabers or long spears, or even with rifles or machine guns. Therefore, it was impossible to gain a stretch of land without keeping the people on that land. However, if we conquered America in this fashion, we would not be able to make many people migrate there. Only by using special means to “clean up” America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not…From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people…We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack [on the United States], the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United States. If, however, the attack fails and triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps suffer a catastrophe in which more than half of its population would perish… In the future, the two rivals, China and the United States, will eventually meet each other in a narrow road, and our leniency to the Americans will mean cruelty toward the Chinese people…It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths. But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we’d have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party. That is because, after all, we are Chinese and members of the CCP.—-Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission ================================================================== In upholding Chinese exclusion in the nineteenth century, Justice Stephen A. Field noted that the Chinese were unassimilable and would destroy the republican ideal of social homogeneity. http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3057.0 60
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 01:05 | # The Speech believed to have been given by Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission—- has been published here: The Middle East, Abstracts and Index ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————- The Middle East, Abstracts and Index By Library Information and Research Service Published by Northumberland Press, 2006 Item notes: no. 1 Original from the University of Michigan Digitized 27 Aug 2008 ————————————————————————- 1 page matching Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages. in this book 61
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 06:45 | # The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Thomas Jefferson
Home Addresses for Gov’t http://turnerradionetwork.blogspot.com/2009/05/home-addresses-for-govt.html The tree of liberty must, at times, be “refreshed”. . . . . but when the time comes, how does one know where to go to help refresh that tree? The Turner Radio Network is pleased to offer for sale, the home addresses and, in some cases, the unlisted home telephone numbers for the following government officials: 1) Members of the United States Senate (100) 7) State Assembly and State Senate Members By their election or appointment to public office, each of the individuals above are, pursuant to the law, “public figures” who do not enjoy the same right to privacy Finally, average American citizens can have access to people with power, but in an environment where the powerful are not shielded by staff, security or other obstructions! After all, if these people are obeying the Constitution, respecting Civil Rights and not over-stepping their authority, they shouldn’t mind anyone knowing where they live. To obtain the home address information of a person you may have interest in, just jot down that person’s full name - including middle initial if available- as well as their official title, the agency or branch of government they work in and the location of the official office they operate from. Mail that info along with $15 cash, check or money order to: Hal Turner We will reply in writing with the information you seek within 7 days. If for some peculiar reason we are not able to furnish the Address requested, you will receive a full refund. Refreshing the Tree of Liberty [ http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/t/thomasjeff109180.html ] is something that Thomas Jefferson thought should happen every 20 years. If so, we’re long overdue. Best prepare yourselves! 62
Posted by the Narrator... on Tue, 12 May 2009 07:19 | #
In England it’s not a question of how many Whites but of how many English. In the UK as a whole, it’s how many British Whites. As Best I can tell, England is around 82% to 84% English. That’s bad. (Just 44 years ago America was 88% White and now were only around 53% White) And what’s worse is the low birth rates for the English and high birthrates for immigrants. I believe Mohammad became the #1 name for newborn boys in Britain this year. Britain has only a few years left to turn things around before it become another America.
America’s founding was the modern blueprint for “diversity”, religious tolerance and multiculturalism. That’s hardly something to be proud of or consider a blessing. ... 63
Posted by Watson on Tue, 12 May 2009 07:39 | # I think this is a supremely excellent idea, and I can’t think of anyone better qualified than yourself to undertake it. One thing I’d consider for comparison’s sake is the popularity of the 14 words. To me, it’s pretty thin gruel, but look at the impact it’s had. While a deeply philosophical document is certainly warranted and needed, we also need - perhaps more urgently - a populist manifesto that can be absorbed and disseminated by the type of people who end up on the front lines and in prison. People who may be impatient with ten-dollar words and philosophy for philosophy’s sake. Pragmatic people who need a ideology that can sustain them under adverse circumstances. Maybe something that can, eventually, supplant Christianity as a source of solace and strength. But maybe that is something for another project. Whatever you come up with, I’m sure that it will be excellent, just as everything you write here is excellent. I look forward to reading it - keep up the great work. 64
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 07:43 | # the Narrator: “Just 44 years ago America was 88% White and now were only around 53% White” V. Good points, Narrator. Does anyone have the REAL stats ? 65
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 07:47 | # I’m sure you could make good use of the 800+ Claims Here.
Claim # 169. We live not in a world of angels. The reign of Satan is not ended; neither are we to expect to be defended by miracles. The pillar of the cloud existed only in the wilderness. In the nonage of the Israelites. It protected them in their retreat from Pharaoh, while they were destitute of the natural means of defence, for they brought no arms from Egypt; but it neither fought their battles nor shielded them from dangers afterwards. Claim # 178. Self defence is a primary law of nature, which no subsequent law of society can abolish; this primæval principle, the immediate gift of the Creator, obliges every one to remonstrate against the strides of ambition, and a wanton lust of domination, and to resist the first approaches of tyranny, which at this day threaten to sweep away the rights for which the brave sons of America have fought with an heroism scarcely paralleled even in ancient republicks. Claim # 180. The right of self-defense never ceases. It is among the most sacred, and alike necessary to nations and to individuals. Claim # 562. Providence has given this one connected country to one united people—a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence. Federalist 2 Claim # 570. In the long run highly successful group strategies spawn mirror images of themselves as non-group members increasingly perceive a need to organize against the group strategy. The result is a fascinating historical dynamic in which the individualistic tendencies of prototypical Western societies have been punctuated in critical historical eras by the development of highly collectivist Western societies with powerful overtones of anti-Semitism. Claim # 571. Ethnic cleansing has been in operation across the globe since time immemorial. It is historically speaking neither new nor remarkable. Claim # 573. Assimilation takes place in the spheres of religion and language most easily and is most successful among people who are culturally similar to the dominant group. When race is the distinguishing feature, assimilation efforts become irrelevant. Claim # 578. Racial homogeneity is the sine qua non of every stable nation state. Claim # 583. Contemporary multiculturalism in the context of high levels of immigration of peoples of all racial and ethnic groups presents the greatest challenge to Western universalism in its history.
We’re talking about a very large body of people who have sold out, or, perhaps better put, have burnt out. With no vital signs left. Yet, to remove them would be to see the U.S. at an end. Not to remove them will be to see another Africa arise on the North American Continent. It is not so much a conspiracy as it is a head being out of touch with its body but yet striving to make certain that the body becomes as vile and perverse as the head, thus spelling doom for the entire organism. The people of this country and indeed most of the West have been betrayed by their own rotten leaders. This is why no renaissance can be possible here. Only revolution. It must be DEATH to an entire strata of the population…and a new fresh ruling elite established. It has historically been the task of each revolution to destroy that which is unclean. That accomplished, nature and man can once again assume their proper course upward. 66
Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 12 May 2009 14:06 | # I think that is enough spamming for one day, M.Battaile And, for anyone who is interested in the real Battle:- http://www.beenthere-donethat.org.uk/sussex/battle.html (See, I can do it too.) 67
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Tue, 12 May 2009 23:10 | # You need to use the following… CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3376.0 Claim # 98. Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. Claim # 105. There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. There is also an artificial aristocracy founded on wealth and birth, without either virtue or talents; for with these it would belong to the first class. Claim # 123. In free governments the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereigns. Claim # 132. All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights. Claim # 138. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends [i.e., securing inherent and inalienable rights, with powers derived from the consent of the governed], it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Claim # 139. If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. Claim # 144. All government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery. Claim # 611. Mankind is divided, physically, into three great races, entirely distinct in appearance, color, and even in anatomical structure: the black or Ethiopian race, the yellow or Mongolian race, and the white or Caucasian race. These are the only three pure and simple types of man. All the other races, the red race, the Malayan-Polynesian races, etc., are but varieties and mixtures of these three primitive races. The particular characteristics that distinguish each of these three types are so marked that many of the learned have considered them, not as different modes, so to speak, of the same human type, but as three distinct types, as three patterns of the human form. The Caucasian or white race is divided into two great branches: the Semitic race, and the Indo-European or Japhetic race. All the civilization of modern humanity has come from these two races; to the Semitic race we owe our religious and moral life, our life of conscience; to the Japhetic race we owe our intellectual, political and social life. Claim # 612. History belongs to the white race, and to no other. Civilization is its true work, and all the societies, political or other, formed by the men of the other races, are but imperfect, gross or repulsive figures of those which had their origin in the white race. It is through the Caucasian race that man has taken possession of the earth; it is through it that he has broken and every day breaks the net-work of external fatalities with which nature surrounded him. All the different religions of mankind sprung up under the pressure of the force of sympathy of that race; all the literatures of the world were produced by the glow of its imagination; its power of invention seems inexhaustible, and its fertility of combination infinite. Only its labor has been blessed, for only its labor has been truly fruitful. When we take a rapid glance at all that has been accomplished by our race, we experience a feeling similar to that experienced by the traveler, who, from a mountain height, sees spread before his eyes cultivated fields and rich cities, and we feel ourselves taken hold of by veneration and respect. Claim # 613. The languages of those nations with whom our civilization originated belong to two primal races, the Indo-Germanic and the Semitic. The ancient culture of the former reached its culminating point in Greece; of the later, in Judaea. In these two countries the typical antithesis between the Indo-Germanic and Semitic races reached its highest point, and the fundamental differences in the views of life of these two races were expressed in the classical works of the Hellenes and Hebrews. Claim # 614. The history of the ancient world is largely made up of the struggle between the southern Semitic line, which issued from the southern grasslands, and the northern Indo-European line, which came forth from the northern grasslands to confront the older civilizations represented in the southern line. Thus we see the two great races facing each other across the Mediterranean like two vast armies stretching from Western Asia westward to the Atlantic. The later wars between Rome and Carthage represent some of the operations on the Semitic left wing, while the triumph of Persia over Chaldea is a similar outcome on the Semitic right wing. The result of the long conflict was the complete triumph of our ancestors (the Indo-European line), who conquered along the center and both wings and finally, as represented by the Greeks and Romans, gained unchallenged supremacy throughout the Mediterranean world. This triumph was accompanied by a long struggle for mastery between the members of the northern line themselves. Among them the victory moved from the east end to the west end of the northern line, as first the Persians, then the Greeks, and finally the Romans gained control of the Mediterranean and oriental world. Claim # 615. The two opposite races have everywhere come into contact, everywhere into hostility. The great victory won by Charles Martel over the Saracens gave a decisive check to the career of Arab conquest in Western Europe, rescued Christendom from Islam, preserved the relics of ancient and the germs of modern civilization, and re-established the old superiority of the Indo-European over the Semitic family of mankind. Claim # 616. When we compare the purest types, the guiding genius of the Indo-European and Semitic races seems to be almost opposite in spirit manifested and in mode of thinking. Claim # 617. The Indo-European is enterprising, adventurous, progressive, inventive, analytical in thought, and philosophical. The people of this stock have ever been of a restless, venturesome disposition, always seeking more worlds to conquer. Tractless forests and unbounded seas must yield up their secrets to these explorers, and even the uncharted skies are traversed by IndoEuropean ships of the air. Claim # 618. The Semite is unadventurous and more stationary in locality. He is, therefore, naturally more narrow in his interests, but he is very intense in thought and feeling at the spot where he applies himself. His imagination is of the concrete sort rather than the abstract. In his mode of getting at truth he is intuitional and prophetic rather than argumentative and rational. Claim # 619. The philosopher and the scientist, analytical in thought and cold in feeling, represent the highest type of thinking among the Indo-Europeans; the prophet, intuitional and very intense, is the climax of Semitic attainment. Claim # 620. Western civilization has its roots in the Indo-European and Semitic cultures. Claim # 621. The two principal branches of the Caucasian race—the Aryans and the Semites—are distinguishable from each other, not only by their languages, but by moral and intellectual qualities which have never been known to change throughout all the generations. Claim # 622. The intellectual qualities predominate in the Japhetite, and the moral in the Semite. Philosophy is the vocation of the one, and religion is the mission of the other. Claim # 623. Through the Semitic race have come forth the most sensual and debased conceptions in mythology which have ever cured mankind, while from its deep sense of divinity have sprung all the religions of the civilized world. Claim # 625. The variety of the world’s races and language families formed part of a providential pattern in human history. Different races had contributed, by way of their particular aptitudes and mentalities, to the unfolding of civilization, religion and progress. The Aryan alone could not supply man’s deeper spiritual wants. The Semite, while ennobling man in his ‘moral bearings’, was incapable of bringing about wider intellectual and scientific changes. The Chinese and Negritic peoples had their own particular characters and aptitudes, but would have raised only a low level of civilization without the beneficial leavening of Semitic and Aryan race influences. A mixture of quite different racial cultures supported the elevation of humanity. Claim # 172. The Framers of the Constitution viewed the individual ownership of firearms as the ultimate check on the power of the government because an armed citizenry is in a better position to resist tyrannical behavior. Symbolically and practically, firearms represents the relationship between the government and the people, and the subordination of the former to the latter. Claim # 173. To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms. A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves and include all men capable of bearing arms. Claim # 190. The right declared [the right to keep and bear arms] was meant to be a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers, and as a necessary and efficient means of regaining rights when temporarily overturned by usurpation. Claim # 192. The firearm in the hands of the citizen symbolizes that we, the people, are our own masters, and we do not exist at the whim of the government. History has shown on numerous occasions that a disarmed society almost always becomes an obedient and complacent society when faced with a tyrannical government. Such fears were paramount in the minds of the Framers of the Constitution, who had experienced, first-hand, the tyranny of King George III and his attempts to disarm them. Indeed, such fears of government tyranny have been present since time immemorial. Moreover, these fears were by no means unique to the eighteenth century; nor have they been reduced with the passage of time. Even as late as the twentieth century, more people were killed at the hands of government than in all of the centuries that preceded it combined. The right of individuals to bear arms still represents the ultimate insurance policy against tyranny and gives meaning, rather than just rhetoric, to the intentions of the Framers. Firearms in the hands of private individuals affords Americans the confidence and security to enjoy their other rights, safe in the knowledge that they are free from the risk of government oppression. American citizens are better able to defend themselves, their families, and their possessions with firearms than without. This is entirely within keeping with the great American traditions and values of individualism and self-reliance. Claim # 827. The entire past history of humanity originally moved only in the circle of race and class struggle. The race struggle is the primal one, and the class struggle secondary. Claim # 828. The history of civilization is the history of the slow and painful enfranchisement of the human race. Claim # 829. Recorded history, more than anything else, is the story of the mankind’s struggle for freedom. There is, within the soul of man, implanted there by Almighty God, a desire to live in peace, and free from the tyrant’s chains. It is the institution of government that has always posed the greatest danger to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. There have been, throughout history, many great men, our Founding Fathers among them, who have warned about the dangers posed by the great powers of government, and the certainty of their abuse, unless held in check by a written Constitution, a constant vigilance, and the security of the force of arms borne by the people. Among these historical and ongoing abuses by government are unjust wars waged for the sake of power, money, and empire. History shows that evil men within governments have more often used their offices and powers to suppress and enslave the domestic populace than foreign enemies. They have created famine and starvation in lands of plenty, murders, false imprisonments, rape, plunder, degradation and destruction of lives, the wanton depletion of the national treasuries of nations, debilitating, unjust and unequal taxation schemes, favoritism, monopolies, unlawful confiscations of properties, destruction of churches, disarming of the populace, impairing the right of conscience, kidnappings, encouraging immoral lifestyles, promoting gambling, prostitution, homosexuality, the destruction of the traditional family, and promoting the murder of the innocent by abortion. These are but a few of the documented abuses by governments down through the ages that compel us to choose Almighty God as our Sovereign and Lord. Therefore, We the People, when choosing our own form of government, rejected once and forever, all earthly kings, setting in place a Government under the Almighty Lord God as our Sovereign. Claim # 833. The supreme of all laws, in all cases, is that of self-preservation. 68
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Thu, 14 May 2009 02:00 | # Races of men are differentiated in the same way as well marked species of animals. Some races are obviously superior to others. A more thorough adjustment to the conditions of existence has given them spirit, vitality, scope and relative stability…it is therefore of the greatest importance not to obscure this superiority by intermarriage with inferior stock, and thus nullify the progress made by a painful evolution and a prolonged sifting of souls. Reason protests as much as instinct against any fusion, for instance, of white and black peoples…(white) greatness falls whenever contact leads to (such) amalgamation. Social intercourse always implies sexual intercourse. I did this (rape) consciously, deliberately, willfully, methodically…It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon white man’s law, upon his system of values, that I was defiling his women. The inevitable result of racial mixing…is a massive reduction in the proportion of intelligent offspring. If the Negro is not removed from the United States the future America will be mongrel, such as the peoples of (today’s) Egypt, India, and certain Latin American countries…when two races come into contact one will expel the other…or adjust their differences through a process of inter-race breeding…the character of the higher race will tend to be obliterated in the mongrels. Dr. Carlton Coon…states that while the White and Yellow races were toilsomely evolving, the Negro in Africa “stood still for half a million years”...To be more specific, the Negro’s brain is smaller and lighter, less complicated, less developed… The primitiveness of his brain betrays itself in the very speed with which it develops after birth, and then suddenly stops development,leaving him like a “lobotomized European”. The Australids, shown to be primitive by their morphological criteria, did not progress on their own initiative beyond the food-gathering status; nor did those classic prototypes of paedomorphosis, the Bushmen or Sanids. A parallel conclusion is forced upon us if we look at the results of cognition and attainment tests carried out on various racesliving under conditions of civilized life. The Mongoloids and Europids did best in both these types of tests; they were followed (at some distance) by the Indianids, and the Negrids were still less successful. In conformity with these results the races among which civilization originated and advanced were the Mongoloids and Europids…Cranial capacity is, of course, directly related to the Ethnic problem since it sets a limit to the size of the brain in the different taxa; but all morphological differences are also relevant… DR. JOHN R. BAKER, biologist, Oxford, Fellow of the Royal Society, from his acclaimed (but suppressed) book, “RACE”. It would be absurd to claim any superiority of all Europids over all Negrids on the evidence of achievement in the intellectual field; yet it must be allowed that the contributions of Negrids to the world of learning have, on the whole, been disappointing, despite all the improvements in facilities for their education. American Negroes are better known for their mass appeal in public affairs and popular entertainment than for great achievements in such subjects as philosophy, mathematics, science or technology. Today, psychological and genetic tests place the matter of mental inequality beyond doubt, as far as the White race and Black race are concerned….the intelligence level of the Negro is far below that of the White. ...the size of the brain relative to size or weight of the body is of crucial importance in placing each species or subspecies in its proper place in tables of advanced or less advanced stocks…the average brain of the Negro differs in weight, being 100 grams or thereabouts less than the average of the Caucasoid….it is quite impossible to maintain the brains are the same when we find a distinct difference of this kind. The human cerebral cortex is the specific organ of civilization…Foresight, purpose and ideals toward which we strive as individuals and as nations are functions of this cortical gray matter. F.W. Vint, Medical Research Laboratory, Kenya, Africa, published reports (1934) of “examinations of the cerebral cortex of 100 representative adult native brains (not including samples from prisons or mental hospitals) which were compared with European brains.” He found that the “supragranular layer of the Negro cortex was about 14% thinner than Whites”. The whole anterior frontal area on one or both sides may be removed without loss of consciousness. During the amputation the individual may continue to talk, unaware of the fact that he is being deprived of the area which most distinguishes his brain from that of a chimpanzee. After its removal there will be a defect but he may well not appreciate it himself. The defect will be in his ability to plan and take initiative… although he may well be able to answer the questions of others as accurately as ever. No western-trained Negro doctor ever volunteered to help Dr. Schweitzer, and his experience so convinced him of the lack of…. mental standards and character in the pure Negro…that he never felt it worthwhile training Negroes for higher responsibilities in his African hospital. It will be seen that when we classify mankind by colour the only one of the primary races… which has not made a creative contribution to any one…of our civilizations is the Black Race. A solution to these problems must be found, but it will never be obtained from falsification of the facts of hereditary and racial history. Races of men are differentiated in the same way as well marked species of animals. The average Negro pupil (I.Q. 80.7) cannot go beyond a national-standard Seventh Grade curriculum; for half the Negro group the Fith Grade is maximum…only one (1%) per cent (110 I.Q. and over) of the Negros are intellectually equipped to do acceptable college work. Thirty (30%) of Whites are so equipped. The differences in thickness of the supragranular layers of the cortex of White and Negro brains is the difference between civilization and savagery. The supragranular layers in the dog are 1/2 the thickness of those in the ape, and the ape’s only 3/4 the thickness of White man. The Negro’s are 14% thinner than White man. CARLTON PUTNAM, LLD, Princeton, Race and Reality. Negroes are more intelligent in direct proportion to the amount of White genes they carry. Evidence suggests that the average I.Q. of Negro populations increases by about One (1)I.Q. point for each one percent of Caucasian genes. Dr. Curt Stern, Prof. of Genetics, University of California, reports that “the Average American Negro gets 3/4 of his genes from his African heritage and 1/4 from White genes.” White genes raise Negro I.Q.; conversely, Black genes dumb-down intellectually superior races. “Almost White”, is an oxymoron, because there is no almost White race. Either you’re White or you are not White. As a social anthropologist I naturally accept and even stress the fact that there are major differences, both mental and psychological, which separate the different races of mankind. Indeed I would be inclined to suggest that however great may be the physical differences between such races as the European and the Negro, the mental and psychological differences are greater still. It is not in our stars, dear Brutus, that we are underlings, but in ourselves. White South Africans are fleeing the country in increasing numbers mainly because of violent crime the government said this week…A recent crime survey by a S. African banking group revealed that on a typical day 52 persons are slain; 470 seriously injured in assaults; more than 100 women are raped; 270 automobiles are hijacked…and 590 homes are burgled. I can conceive of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the Negro into our social and political life as our equal. There is nothing more terrible than a barbaric slave class, who have learned to regard their existence as an injustice, and now prepare to revenge, not only themselves but all future generations. In the face of such threatening storms who dares to appeal with any confidence to our pale exhausted religions. We have between us a broader difference than exists betweenalmost any other two races…If this is to be admitted it affords a reason, at least, why we should be separated. Social intercourse always implies sexual intercourse. I did this (rape) consciously, deliberately, willfully, methodically…It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon white man’s law, upon his system of values, that I was defiling his women. The inevitable result of racial mixing…is a massive reduction in the proportion of intelligent offspring. Some races are obviously superior to others. A more thorough adjustment to the conditions of existence has given them spirit, vitality, scope and relative stability…it is therefore of the greatest importance not to obscure this superiority by intermarriage with inferior stock, and thus nullify the progress made by a painful evolution and a prolonged sifting of souls. Reason protests as much as instinct against any fusion, for instance, of white and black peoples…(white) greatness falls whenever contact leads to (such) amalgamation. If the Negro is not removed from the United States the future America will be mongrel, such as the peoples of (today’s) Egypt, India, and certain Latin American countries…when two races come into contact one will expel the other…or adjust their differences through a process of inter-race breeding…the character of the higher race will tend to be obliterated in the mongrels. Dr. Carlton Coon…states that while the White and Yellow races were toilsomely evolving, the Negro in Africa “stood still for half a million years”...To be more specific, the Negro’s brain is smaller and lighter, less complicated, less developed… The primitiveness of his brain betrays itself in the very speed with which it develops after birth, and then suddenly stops development,leaving him like a “lobotomized European”. The Australids, shown to be primitive by their morphological criteria, did not progress on their own initiative beyond the food-gathering status; nor did those classic prototypes of paedomorphosis, the Bushmen or Sanids. A parallel conclusion is forced upon us if we look at the results of cognition and attainment tests carried out on various racesliving under conditions of civilized life. The Mongoloids and Europids did best in both these types of tests; they were followed (at some distance) by the Indianids, and the Negrids were still less successful. In conformity with these results the races among which civilization originated and advanced were the Mongoloids and Europids…Cranial capacity is, of course, directly related to the Ethnic problem since it sets a limit to the size of the brain in the different taxa; but all morphological differences are also relevant… DR. JOHN R. BAKER, biologist, Oxford, Fellow of the Royal Society, from his acclaimed (but suppressed) book, “RACE”. It would be absurd to claim any superiority of all Europids over all Negrids on the evidence of achievement in the intellectual field; yet it must be allowed that the contributions of Negrids to the world of learning have, on the whole, been disappointing, despite all the improvements in facilities for their education. American Negroes are better known for their mass appeal in public affairs and popular entertainment than for great achievements in such subjects as philosophy, mathematics, science or technology. Negroes are getting lighter: If you marry - marry light! 69
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Thu, 14 May 2009 02:32 | # From: <cafe@canadafirst.net>
http://www.standard.net/live/opinion/letterstotheeditor/171042/ Memo From Mexico: http://www.vdare.com/awall/080916_memo.htm 70
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Thu, 14 May 2009 03:44 | # While Western Civilization sits confused, crippled with self-doubt and guilt, the Chinese are rapidly building an energy-intensive technological civilization. They have 2,000 coal-fired power plants, and are currently constructing new ones at the rate of one a week. In China, more people believe in free-market economics than in the US. Our Asian friends are about to be nominated by history as the new torchbearers of human progress. May 13, 2009 Death of a Civilization by David Deming http://lewrockwell.com/orig9/deming2.html May 12, 2009?
71
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Thu, 14 May 2009 05:50 | # WHITE & ENDANGERED http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/forum/index.php?topic=3809.0 White, European and Endangered: Is the Caucasian Race Dying? Karin Friedemann (Letter From America) 13 May 2009 http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data/opinion/2009/May/opinion_May62.xml§ion=opinion&col;= Some call this creeping multiculturalism “a Genocide against the White race.” While globalist strategy does appear to undermine local social cohesion first by encouraging immigration and then by whipping up anti-immigrant hysteria, such analysis ignores personal choice. White people have not been reproducing at replacement levels. “Around the time that President Kennedy went to Germany and gave his ‘Ich bin ein Berliner’ speech, Europe represented 12.5 per cent of the world’s population. Today it is 7.2 per cent, and if current trends continue, by 2050 only 5 per cent of the world will be European,” states Russell Shorto in the ?New York Times. “We start to wonder about our identity at the moment when we are about to lose it,” notes Tom Sunic in the Occidental Observer, but the Pan-?European identity is something quite new in history. “Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanise us instead of our Anglifying them?” Benjamin Franklin complained in 1751. “In the early 20th century, federal immigration officials classified the Irish, Italians, and Jews as separate races. Yet today all these groups are viewed collectively, and benignly, as ‘white,’” writes Jeff Jacoby in the Boston Globe. Yet White identity has largely been defined collectively as the opposite of benign because it comes with the historical baggage of Southern Slavery, Segregation, Apartheid, and Colonialism. Throughout the Western world and its former colonies legal systems had separate laws for Whites and non-Whites. Even when such discrimination has been eliminated from codes, complaints persist of unfair enforcement and unequal protection alongside continuing structural inequalities. “Whiteness” has been used as a weapon against non-Whites by the bankers and proprietors of capital to prevent working class solidarity, while simultaneously White Christian middle and upper classes have been subjected to decades of what Prof. Kevin MacDonald calls the “culture of critique emanating from the most prestigious academic and media institutions.” Blogger Christian Lander summarises: “As a straight white male, I’m the worst thing on earth.” In college I actually told my American history professor, “I wish I could rip my skin off.” Jews are always exempt from collective White Guilt as their involvement in Bolshevik massacres, the American slave trade, and the conquest of ?Palestine is never mentioned at any level of the US public educational system while the Holocaust is taught starting in Kindergarten. Although White Christians have been demonised as the Oppressor class, poverty is not specific to race in the United States. Representative Cynthia McKinney in a Congressional report concerning Hurricane Katrina points out: “In the greater New Orleans area, 65,000 minority residents lived in poverty before Katrina, compared with ?85,000 whites.” Sinister plots to reduce non-white populations and sometimes white Muslim populations through promotion of birth control, instigating warfare, starvation and disease have however constituted a recurring feature of international politics. In 1974, the US National Security Council under Henry Kissinger released a memorandum on the “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth” claiming that population growth in Lesser Developed Countries was a dangerous threat to US national security. It has even become popular to view mass death as something positive. Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund said, “If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels,” according to a 1995 American Policy Center report. Neoconservative commentator Mark Steyn writes in America Alone, “If you can’t outbreed the enemy, cull ‘em.” Likewise, abortion has been promoted as a way of reducing the population of the poor. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood and member of the Eugenics Society wrote in 1922: “Those least fit to carry on the race are increasing most rapidly… Funds that should be used to raise the standard of our civilisation are diverted to maintenance of those who should never have been born.” Despite disproportionate use by African Americans of abortion services, their birth rate remains higher than replacement level while European American’s population continues to decline. Similar disparities exist in Europe. In 2005, 64,000 children were born in Norway of two foreign-born parents in comparison with only 13,800 children born to native Norwegian parents. Immigration in combination with higher non-European birth rates has resulted in projected transformation of majorities into minorities. Journalist Eric Walberg blames the downfall of Europe on neoliberalism while author Michael Hoffman blames moral degeneracy. “The non-reproducing (i.e. self-exterminating) Whites of Europe and America live for luxury.” Yet, Europeans have always been a global minority. Even pre-Christian Romans often recommended later marriage as a display of patience and chastity while in other cultures women typically produced their first baby at 14 or 15. In the 17th century, advances in medicine and hygiene resulted in increasing European populations. Other nations are now catching up. Those who are panicked about disappearing European Christian culture should strive to address the socio-economic and emotional factors that discourage those of European ancestry from ?having children. 72
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Thu, 14 May 2009 06:01 | # In Australia, Jewish organizations have also been leading the push to criminalize thought. Andrew Fraser, a former professor of public law at Macquarie University in Sydney, was brought before the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission because he had written a letter published in a newspaper suggesting that “once black African colonies in Australia grow in size and in confidence, one can reasonably expect a number of social problems and rising levels of crime and violence.” In his comments before the Commission, Fraser noted that the charges against him by an African had actually been instigated by “several organized Jewish groups that boast openly of the campaign they have organized against me,” citing articles in Jewish newspapers. Fraser wrote that Jewish individuals and organizations had acted “to further their shared ethnic interest in the growth of a multi-racial society in Australia.” In a wonderful passage, Fraser states that he has no objection against African and Jewish groups pursuing their interests in making Australia into a multi-racial society— “But they must understand that, as Australia becomes a multi-racial society, it is inevitable that Anglo-Australians, having observed the self-interested activities of other racial, ethnic and religious groups, are bound to become more conscious of their own distinctive racial identity. Many white Australians already feel that they are losing their ancestral homeland to a massive influx of Third World migrants hostile or indifferent to the ethnic interests of the host society. … The simple fact is that a multi-racial immigration policy is not obviously and necessarily in the best interests of white Australians.” Exactly. But the problem is that there is an imposing array of national and international organizations that are both promoting non-White immigration into formerly European countries, and attempting to criminalize any dissent from that policy. http://vdare.com/macdonald/090511_hate_crimes_prevention_bill.htm
73
Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 14 May 2009 08:51 | # Bataille, For the second and final time, would you please cease spamming the threads? You are becoming a pest. I am going to thin out your material and delete all further attacks in toto. If you want to sift through your stuff and post something useful and germaine to the thread please use HTML code for these very long links. They are disrupting the page-layout. Thank you. 74
Posted by BATTAILE ('BATTLE') on Thu, 14 May 2009 10:11 | #
CALM DOWN Guessedworker. No need to get your panties in a bunch! I get your point. Sincere Apologies. 75
Posted by Lurker on Thu, 14 May 2009 10:15 | # I didnt realise that was why this page was, almost literally, a mile wide. Post a comment:
Next entry: Didacticism and virality: A rant
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 10 May 2009 00:37 | #
I do agree that centralising concepts in the manner you suggest is not only important, but crucial to vigorous action in the popular sphere. But it is as difficult to achieve said centralisation as any other political persuasion.
At the end of last year I met a European nationalist at Gatwick, at his request. We talked for about four hours, in the way that we folks do when we encounter like minds. It was a good discussion. But during it I ventured the opinion, not exactly unknown here, that NS contains elements of fictive teleology which render it unsuitable to the modern age. Suddenly, I was confronted with a burst of feeling. My friend spoke with a force and sincerity in favour of NS that was completed unexpected, describing it as the perfected form of European national striving.
Of course, I wasn’t going to continue my line of argument. I listened and moved the discussion on to other areas of interest. But what chance would I have had of convincing this very European, very Idealist thinker that the materialist Anglo-American approach had anything whatsoever to offer over and above NS?
For me, the problem is clear. We philosophical Anglos have no foundational ideas that we can communicate. So we have absolutely no choice but to theorise and enunciate a complete philosophy of life for the European, arising out of the experience of being - of Dasein - and presence in the same, and expanding in its general trajectory to address the evolution of our sociobiology, and out of sociobiology our distinctiveness and our character, and again, out of this specificity, the natural roots of our interests. Let what is forever be - that should be our motto.
Only when this work is well advanced can we make gestures in the direction of the political with any realistic hope of drawing the wider nationalist world towards us. But that has to be the aim, and in that, my friend, you are right.