Utopian idealists, moral cowards, traitors, and heroes of our nation by David Hamilton
We are led to believe that mass immigration is a blessing to us and that only Enoch Powell and a few narrow-minded and prejudiced people have ever seen danger in it. All decent folk of good will, we are told, have embraced this break in our national continuity as a sign of enlightenment, with people progressing to a higher state of civilisation - that of a one-world utopia made up of coffee-coloured persons. It has also been presented as an ideological battle between left and right. But, actually, it is between people of common sense and utopian idealists. Most ordinary people relate to the world by common sense. We who wish to preserve our traditional way of life know how human nature works from our experience of how peoples treat with one another and what they are capable of. We have learned from history how different ethnic groups vie with one another for power and territory. Looking at the world around us, we see that in practice immigration is not assimilation, but the colonisation of our territory. So the impracticable dream of a multiracial utopia has had to be socially-engineered, which required totalitarian methods. The Utopians see immigrants as essentially good, and if we are nice to them they will be nice to us. But this utopianism does not do away with human nature, and we perceive foreigners being brought in as cheap labour, with idealism just as a smokescreen. If the high-minded ones are so benevolent and moral, why have their plans been underhand, we ask. And why the public infamy for those who foresaw danger in just letting it happen? Multi-Racialism follows on from the French Enlightenment in trying to create a society on rationalist principles, ignoring human nature. The Soviet Union was the same. Utopians never describe reality but appeal to a vague dream of some future time. They do not face the fact that if we once conquered and colonised the immigrants’ lands then, as newcomers in our land, they will seek to conquer and colonise us. People from all walks of life have now given warning of this practical consequence, which shows that the British people are conservative by nature and not given to utopian fancies. Some may have attacked the utopian’s idealism with crude remarks about the immigrants. But most bring common sense to the situation and focus on the politics and irresponsibility of idealists who just let things happen with no control. All have suffered and some have been openly persecuted. Two days after the Empire Windrush docked on the 22 July 1948 with 790 West Indians, J.D.Murray and ten other Labour MP’s wrote to Labour Prime Minister Clement Atlee, asking for legislation to prevent an influx. Atlee replied, that he thought they would “make a genuine contribution to our labour difficulties at the present.” There had been racial battles in 1948 between 31 July and 2 August in Liverpool, in Deptford on the 18th July; and Birmingham between the 6th and 8th of August 1949. But the idealists ignored them as they had in 1919 when after the racial battles in Liverpool and Cardiff Lord Milner wrote a Memorandum of June 23rd titled On the Repatriation of Coloured Men.
The first actual debate on immigration was in the House of Commons on the 5th of November 1954 in a thirty-minute adjournment debate called by John Hynd, Labour MP for Sheffield (Attercliffe). “One day recently 700 embarked from Jamaica without any prospect of work, housing or anything else,” he noted. He also said the colour-bar in Sheffield dance halls because of knife fights was justified. Both Hynd and another Labour MP James Johnson called for a committee of enquiry to be set up. Other speakers repeatedly asked the Government to take action. But Henry Hopkinson (C), Minister of State at the Colonial Office, fobbed them off by telling them “the matter is receiving urgent attention.” He did admit that he had received many letters from worried MPs on both sides. In March 1955 Frank Burden (L), in a debate on National Service, asked the Parliamentary Secretary at the Ministry of Labour why immigrants did not have to serve in the armed forces as native-born youngsters did. Winston Churchill battled in cabinet against appeasers of Commonwealth leaders, but was old and ailing. In 1955 he tried to get the Conservative Party to adopt the slogan “Keep England White”. If Sir Winston had been well we would not now be suffering gun killings, knifings and muggings or Muslims bombing our people. Harold Macmillan entered in his diary for January 20th 1955,
The bill was not ready until June 1955, two months after Churchill had stood down. (Peter Hennessy, ‘Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties’ (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224. Hennessy’s reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), ‘The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957’ Macmillan. 2003 p 382.) People have tried to keep this aspect of Churchill’s beliefs quiet. Documents at the Public Records Office show the fifth Marquess of Salisbury trying to effect some change:
These records also show Oliver Lyttleton (later Lord Chandos) trying to bring common sense to bear on the matter. In a letter to Swinton dated 31st March 1954 he demanded deposits of £500 to be put down by all immigrants:
He had a list of all restrictions imposed on Britons by other Commonwealth countries who refused to accept “persons who are likely to become a public charge”. It included “illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” or had “unsuitable standards or habits of life”. Many Commonwealth countries operated quota systems and even dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited anyone likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependants as he shall bring with him to the island”. Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission. We look back to the time of Salisbury’s illustrious ancestor Lord Burleigh, advisor to “Good Queen Bess”, and see coming alive our tradition of practical wisdom. It was Elizabeth1 who in 1601 had the “neggars” expelled from her realm. As we move forward we find David Hume, the great Scottish philosopher, write in Of National Characters:
His near contemporary Edward Gibbon, the great historian of the Collapse of Rome, warned of a time hence when minarets would sprout amongst the spires of Oxford. Farther on, we come to G.K.Chesterton who predicted a war with Muslims in England in his novel The Flying Inn (1912). Nearer still, Enoch Powell refined his views in a speech to the Southall Chamber of Commerce on 4th November 1971:
On 20th January 1955, when immigration from Jamaica was 11,000 a year, Conservative Cyril Osborne(later knighted) had written to the London Times:
The open door for all was not brought under any kind of control until the Commonwealth Immigration bill (1961). At the second reading Osborne warned that:
Both sides of the House laughed at him and called him “Fascist”. But he was far-sighted, for we are seeing his warning come true now with the countless boats leaving Africa for Europe. Churchill was replaced as P.M. by arch-internationalist Anthony Eden, who answered Osborne in the House of Commons,
In May 1958, 3 months before the racial battles of Notting Hill and Nottingham, Osborne had written to Labour leader Hugh Gaitskell, who contemptuously handed it to his secretary to reply,
Osborne instigated a Commons debate on the 5th December 1958, three months after the racial battles, when Labour spokesman Arthur Bottomley replied,
Seconding the motion Martin Lindsay said:
Simon Heffer relates in his biography of Enoch Powell, Like the Roman, that in 1958 Osborne pleaded with the Conservatives 1922 backbench committee to consider the future consequences of mass immigration. When they refused to listen this genuine and sincere man broke down and wept. In March 1965 he told the House,
Supporting Osborne in December 1958 was Labour’s Frank Tomney, who remarked on the subject of elected representatives ignoring their constituents:
Fellow Notting Hill MP George Rogers (L) told the Daily Sketch of 2nd September 1958:
James Harrison (L) from Nottingham also supported controls. Mr Tomney was a practical man of humble origins and understood his people, “I have come directly from the benches of a factory to the benches of the Commons”. In the Guardian of 20/3/01 Andrew Roth slotted him into a standard stereotype, “the crusty old far-right Labour MP.” In the late 70’s Militant, the ideological group in the labour party, tried to de-select him. Norman Pannell (C), MP for Liverpool Kirkdale, who had served in the Nigerian legislature and lived in Africa for over 10 years proposed a motion at the 1958 Tory conference to replace the open door policy with reciprocal rights of entry with other Commonwealth countries:
He also addressed the 1961 conference on the perils of admitting criminals and the sick. The debate was stage-managed to block Cyril Osborne from speaking. He stood outside in the rain handing out off-prints of a letter of his from the morning’s Daily Telegraph. Mr. Pannell stated that though Home Secretary Butler had disagreed with limiting numbers he had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes, but nothing had been done. In a letter to the Times of 13th December 1960, Harold Gurden wrote:
In the winter of 1961-62 a young Pakistani girl entered the country with smallpox and caused an epidemic. In January 1962 two Pakistanis were in hospital in Birmingham with smallpox. Mr.Gurden wrote to the Minister of Health urging medical checks on immigrants. In 2005 we were told that we now have a record number of TB cases and there are more in London than the usual breeding grounds of the disease abroad. Peter Griffiths, MP Smethwick, called for health checks on immigrants when he responded to a question in the local paper the “Smethwick Telephone”:
This was prescient as there was an outbreak of typhoid in Smethwick in April 1965. In 1964 there had been uproar over the general election at Smethwick which Griffiths won against the trend on anti-immigration - as did Wyndham Davies (C) in Birmingham,Great Barr. The loser was shadow Foreign Secretary Patrick Gordon-Walker, who lived at leafy Hampstead Garden Suburb. Mr Griffiths lost this seat in 1966 to Andrew Faulds who lived in Stratford upon Avon! Several well publicised events made this West Midlands industrial town world famous. A slogan used during his election campaign was “If you want a nigger for a neighbour vote Labour.” The town council wanted to buy the remaining houses in Marshall street to stop it becoming “a coloured ghetto”. Prime Minister Harold Wilson described Griffiths as a “Parliamentary leper” on television. A bomb was planted outside Griffith’s home on 26th October 1965 because of the way he had been de-humanised by press and politicians. A series in the Times in January 1965 titled The Dark Million showed what the official attitude was. The author wrote:
In the House of Lords debate on the renewal of the Commonwealth Immigration Act of 1st December1964, Lord Elton took the long view:
On the 5th of March 1965 Patrick Wall (later knighted) spoke against the multiracial ideal:
In the debate on the 1968 Race Relations Bill Ronald Bell (later knighted) argued that the bill made
In a speech titled This Sceptred Isle to W.I.S.E. at the National Liberal Club in 1981 he was concerned at the nascent totalitarianism in the multiracialists attitude:
Sir Ronald had constant difficulties with his constituency party chairman who wanted him de-selected. Harold Soref had to flee a mob of unworldly students that tried to break into the Oxford Union and attack him while he addressed the University Monday Club on immigration on 10th May 1974. He should of accused them of anti-semitism! John Stokes MP wrote to The Times on 27th May 1976:
He was mocked by the Daily Mirror as “the member for the 17th Century.” Warren Hawksley (C) Wrekin, told Oswestry Conservatives in 1981,
In the same year Tony Marlowe(C), MP for Northampton, told the Oxford University Conservative Association:
K Harvey Proctor addressed the 1983 Conservative party conference, but no senior party member sat on the platform apart from a glum-looking John Biffen, who only clapped sparely. Mrs Thatcher was not present. Just two years previously Proctor had announced a plan by the Monday Club’s Immigration and Repatriation Committee to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. The forward to the document was by Sir Ronald Bell. Mrs Thatcher rushed to assure Asian leaders that they have a right to be here. Just two years previously she had won power by stating on TV that the British people feared “being swamped.” At a Monday Club dinner in early 1984 guest of honour Enoch Powell revealed that the Conservative party had threatened to not speak to Proctor for his belief in repatriation, which would have been the first time in their history they had sent one of their MPs to Coventry! In 1993 the grandson of Sir Winston Churchill, also called Winston, warned that in the north of England half the population was now Muslim and “if our Prime Minister” (Major) believes that 50 years hence “spinsters will still be cycling to Communion on Sunday morning” he had best think again. Rather, “the muezzin will be calling Allah’s faithful to the High Street mosque” for Friday prayers. The Times attacked him for a “tasteless outburst”. A leading Labour Party politician described his remarks as “putrid and racist”. Michael Howard, the Conservative Home Secretary, denounced “any intervention which could have the effect of damaging race relations”. Downing Street stated Conservative Prime Minister John Major agreed with Mr. Howard. Mr Churchill was viscously shouted down on BBC Radio Four’s Today programme by presenter John Humphreys in what was a despicable attack on an elected politician. Another Conservative MP to be bullied by his party leader (William Hague) was John Townend, who wrote in 1991, that Government “ministers wanted to turn the British into a “mongrel” race and the Commission for Racial Equality should be abolished.” In 1989, he suggested deportation of Muslims who opposed Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses, “England must be reconquered for the English”. Another of Sir Winston’s grandsons, Nicholas Soames made his presence felt in the Commons on 17th July 2007. He said:
He was accused hysterically of getting his information from the BNP! In 2005 Lord Tebbit, former chairman of the Conservative party, told e-politix website that Islam is so unreformed there have been no real advances in art, literature, science or technology in the Muslim world in 500 years, and multiculturalism was in danger of undermining UK society. In the 1980s he disputed the loyalty of immigrants who backed cricket teams from their countries of origin. He claimed if he had been heeded it might have stopped the London bombings. A leading Muslim group said he was “misguided”. After the Muslim bomb attacks in London he declared that Enoch’s prophecies of racial civil war were right. Charles Moore, former editor of the Daily Telegraph, produced Salisbury Paper 9 in 1981 titled The Old People of Lambeth. It was an empirical-based study of the real living conditions of “whites” rather than another abstract academic study. One elderly man told him, “…it’s our Queen and our country, why should we be afraid to go out?” Another former Sunday Telegraph editor Sir Peregrine Worsthorne has written that “even Hitler would not have treated ordinary people with such cruelty.” In 1991 the Conservative party tried to impose a black candidate on its party in Cheltenham. A local party member Bill Galbraith expressed his indignation in crude language and was pilloried by the media and hounded by the Race Police, and this persecution led to his death. Eminent legal minds were concerned. Viscount Radcliffe, former Lord of Appeal in Ordinary, spoke up about the preferential treatment being accorded to immigrants above that given to the natives:
In a case against squatters, Judge Harold Brown commented:
In 1995 retired judge, James Pickles, told a literary luncheon in Leeds:
The MP for Bradford, Max Madden (L), described Judge Pickles as a “repulsive old buffer” who had “plumbed the depths by his remarks which will cause widespread offence to people of all races and nationalities.” Liaqat Hussain of the Bradford Council for Mosques called for Judge Pickles to be prosecuted under the Race Relations Act. In 1982 Lord Denning, widely regarded as the twentieth century’s greatest judge, published What Next In The Law (ten thousand copies of which the publishers withdrew because of some inaccuracies), saying:
Lord Denning had been a benefactor to young people from the Commonwealth and was merely expressing common sense. In 1976 Rock guitarist Eric Clapton advised his audience that Enoch was right and that Britain was overcrowded. This raised a profoundly important point about culture and Multi-Racialism. Those of us who were brought up on Black music as I was, have a great respect and admiration for those blues and soul singers who developed a deep, expressive music. Clapton had black musicians in his band but understood a human truth - that enjoying different cultures and having friends from other ethnic groups is good: but that does not mean that we should try to force them together and destroy both. There have also been scholars who have spoken out too. Dr John Casey read a paper to the Conservative Philosophy Group which was also printed in the first issue of The Salisbury Review in Autumn 1982.
Dr Casey was persecuted for this and recanted. Marxist professor Terry Eagleton held rival English lectures, the usual campus rent-a-mobs demonstrated and refused to go to his lectures. On 1st December `1991 the Sunday Times printed a photograph that made Dr.Casey look like a wizened crow! Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton was quoted in The Opinion Journal of 10th December 2002:
For years we have been told how evil we are and how morally superior the multiracialists are. But now we see that a main motive for importing immigrants is for them to have cheap labour. Eminent economist Professor Ezra Mishan exposed immigration as being about cheap labour in the Salibury Review in 1988:
Professor Bob Rowbotham, in the Sunday Telegraph of 2nd July 2006, referred to the motives of the elites. They were creating what Marx called “A reserve army of labour.” In November 2006 it emerged that the Government were advertising for immigrants to come here. A Foreign Office pamphlet declares: Multicultural Britain - A Land of Immigrants. It encourages immigrants to move here because of the preferential treatment they get under the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. The Foreign Office put it in embassies across the world. In a book review for the Salisbury Review of Spring 2003 Sir Alfred Sherman, former senior advisor to Mrs Thatcher and leader writer on the Jewish Chronicle, recalled a friend in race relations had asked him to take a look at the reception areas of Deptford and Southall in the mid 60’s:
The transformation of Southall was brought about by Wolf’s rubber factory encouraging workers from India. But it is since New Labour took office in 1997 that there has been such a massive increase in immigration that even middle-class liberals are now worried. The veteran Liberal broadcaster Ludovic Kennedy wrote in a book review for “The Oldie”, in January 2004, that there are:
The preferential treatment given to immigrants over that to our own elderly caused Sir Patrick Moore, the world renowned astronomer to remark:
Early in 2005 Welsh film star John Rhys-Davies, who played Gimli in Lord of the Rings, told World magazine that: “the Muslim birth-rate is a demographic catastrophe. I think that Tolkein says that some generations will be challenged. And if they do not rise to meet that challenge, they will lose their civilisation.” The same month in the Radio Times film star John Hurt praised Enoch:
The Socialist intellectual David Goodhart in Prospect (March 1998), quoted Conservative M.P. David Willetts on the Welfare State:
Prof. Goodhart reflected:
In an echo of Enoch’s warnings on “racial civil war” the Sunday Times of 11th June 2006 reported that Rear Admiral Chris Parry, one of Britain’s most senior military strategists, has warned that western civilisation faces a threat on a par with the barbarian invasions that destroyed the Roman empire. He said future migrations would be comparable to the Goths and Vandals while north African “Barbary” pirates could be attacking yachts and beaches in the Mediterranean within 10 years. Europe, including Britain, could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries. A “reverse colonisation”, Parry described it. These groups would stay connected to their homelands by the internet and cheap flight. The warnings by Parry of what could threaten Britain over the next 30 years were delivered to senior officers and industry experts at a conference. The result for Britain and Europe, could be “like the 5th century Roman empire facing the Goths and the Vandals”:
Lord Boyce, the former chief of the defence staff, welcomed Parry’s analysis:
Frank Field (L) has also spoken out on cheap labour. In August 2006 he was questioned by the panel on the BBC Radio 4’s Moral Maze and asked why he has only raised the issue now, when the mass of current immigrants are white (from Eastern Europe). His answer was:
He took the side of the poor natives and talked about this influx pushing down wages, and people having to compete for homes. He commented that the panel are well-heeled and are the ones who actually benefit from cheap labour. Former Conservative MP George Walden wrote a book, Time to Emigrate (Gibson Square Books), in the form of an exposition to his son telling him how we are being replaced. Writing in the Times of 5th November 2006 he described a hostile encounter afterwards with the historian Tristram Hunt:
Comments:2
Posted by gina on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:13 | # I am always interested in the contrast between national Conservatism and radical nationalism but not clear how the latter could succeed when the former failed as there don’t seem to be any proper distinctions made. If there are any articles on RN please inform me as I would like to see what it is as I have not yet seen it defined adequately. These debates are themselves signs of health. 3
Posted by Marwinsing on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:52 | #
Could I offer an alternative word to the phrase “utopian idealists”? Umm… something like madness? As always, a rich and informative post from Mr Hamilton. 4
Posted by Wandrin on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:45 | # Interesting overview. It shows how many elite traitors there’s been along the way.
From the point of view of a small elite group who want complete oligarchic power over a society then a multi-racial cattle class underneath them is an ideal, as it hinders collective rebellion. This kind of society is especially ideal for the elite if the elite is itself not multi-racial. They keep all the benefits of ethno-centricity for themselves while denying those benefits to their competitors. Obviously not ideal from the point of view of the cattle class. Nor, when it comes in reality, will this end game seem very ideal to all those traitorous Sarumans who thought Sauron’s little minions would share power when the project was completed. Their ideal is our destruction.
I may be misunderstanding the question but to my mind the fatal flaw with conservatives is their blind spot over big business. Big business is as internationalist as marxism and always acts as a fifth column inside conservative parties. Radical nationalism could be National Capitalist, National Socialist or National in-betweenist but international capitalism is a fifth column that needs to be kept in a box. 5
Posted by the Narrator... on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:10 | # This article kind of casts doubt on a political solution to our problem. If Lords and Prime Ministers could do nothing a half a century ago In England then what hope have we treading the same route? It’s been nearly a century since Stoddard and Grant published their prophetic warnings. Its been nearly eighty years since Huxley described the ‘Brave New World and sixty years since Orwell’s vision of 1984. And we are four decades on and several inches deep in Enoch Powell’s “rivers of blood”. It seems that the revelation that an iceberg is directly ahead of us has not altered our course, even as the iceberg has come within sight. The path we’ve tread over the past century has been clearly seen and it’s end well understood by many. It’s not enough to see that we are about to stumble. We must either pick up our feet or get ready to taste the dirt. At this dark hour it seems our civilization faces either a glorious and unexpected renewal, or a long looked for demise. If it is the latter, the remnant of our people will be scattered to the wind in a hostile world for centuries to come.
6
Posted by Wandrin on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:34 | #
Individuals can’t do a thing. You need numbers. Gaining numbers requires taking people from both sides of the class divide which means rejecting the mainstream left and the mainstream right parties and going through the middle with a third party that can attract from both sides, rejecting both international capitalism and international socialism. Even then the resultant party has to make the right tactical moves time and time again with the entire power structure of the state attacking them. It’s definitely tricky and unfortunately getting trickier as our genocidal enemy adds legal warfare to the psychological warfare. However i think the crux is, if the political route doesn’t work and things spiral down to the point where the muslims think they have the numbers to start a civil war then a nationalist political party with 100,000 members becomes the nucleus of an army which is a lot better than being in the same situation on your own. 7
Posted by gina on Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:04 | # I was hoping that an intellectual like Mr.Renner would explain how radical nationalism can succeed where national conservatism failed. I am genuinely interested in this but am sceptical of ideologies. 8
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:03 | # Gina, was there ever a “national conservatism” that was against race-replacement? Can you point to one? On social issues “conservatism” has always followed “liberalism” after a certain period of delay and pretend foot-dragging. In looking at “conservatism” and “liberalism” contending with one another you’re watching a professional wrestling match between Hulk Hogan and the Iron Sheik: they both work for the same behind-the-scenes organization and are behind-the-scenes friends, colleagues, and allies striving for the same goals. And you’re the person among the spectators panned every now and then in camera close-up shouting and shaking his fist at one or the other, unaware it’s all pre-arranged and choreographed and whichever one wins, the same behind-the-scenes organization wins — the exact same. 9
Posted by torgrim on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:38 | # From article; As in England the experiment of mass immigration has gone wrong in the US too. Santa Cruz County California used to be a paradise! Now it is a known as the Stabbing capitol. Thanks to the Utopians and other fools! http://www.stabsantacruz.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47&Itemid=53 10
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:48 | #
I was just browsing Ethan Allen’s book which I’d linked in another thread, here, and it’s a book worth reading, for those who haven’t yet, as a picture of what can only be called a hero of our nation, a hero in the terms and circumstances of his epoch of course (the circumstances a hero of our nation must contend with now are of course different). He wrote this book while the Revolutionary War was still raging, its outcome still in the unknown future, after he’d been part of a prisoner exchange, traded back to America in return for some British officers whom the Americans held. Here’s the book’s opening, including Allen’s capture of Fort Ticonderoga:
Fort Ticonderoga, where the above action took place: 11
Posted by gina on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:00 | # The nearest thing was The Monday club. Their official policy was a plan by the Club’s Immigration and Repatriation Committee to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. The forward to the document was by Sir Ronald Bell. Mrs Thatcher rushed to assure Asian leaders that they have a right to be here. Just two years previously she had won power by stating on TV that the British people feared “being swamped.” Post a comment:
Next entry: John Wadham: father of modern British nationalism!
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsAl Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 02 May 2024 04:26. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 02 May 2024 03:35. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 02 May 2024 03:12. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:20. (View) |
Posted by Steven E. Romer on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:04 | #
I think this is an enlightening article, but it ignores the 500-lb gorilla of the politics of Jews in the immigration crises in various European countries.. (see dr. Kevin Macdonald’s The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Paperback)) Also, it uses the term “ideal” and “idealistic” wrong. Ideals are higher things—something that we strive for, not just let happen as in spilt milk. A multiracial society is a free-for-all, a bringing DOWN to the least common denominator, NOT an “ideal”. It is the will of a small segment of the population that has been vigorously foisted upon us over time, until it has infected all our media and our minds. There is nothing wrong with “racism” either—it is moral, objectively correct, and universal in nature like the suckling of the young is in mammals. It isn’t an “ism” at all—it is a genuine interest just liek we are interested in the welfare of our children. See the book “On Genetic Interests: Family, Ethnicity, and Humanity in an Age of Mass Migration” by Frank Salter. It is the height of immorality to allow special interests, and the interests of the greedy forced to look for cheap labor because others are using it, to destroy the eternal soul of an entire people. All morals involve looking to the long-term, the collective effects, the higher road. Mass third-world immigration into a high-functioning European country is immoral, just like prostitution, murder, and stealing. Anyone who tells you different has no right to lead or represent you—they do not have your best interests at heart.