War In Defense of the National Union The US government’s pro-immigration stance has become the equivalent of a union-busting corrupt police force hired to commit violence against those who would _act_ to stop scabs from crossing the picket line. The history of union violence is therefore very relevant to the current situation. At present, the corrupt police force has cowed the picket line into using no force whatsoever despite the fact that they are lawfully entitled to do so given the failure of the government to uphold its part of the New Deal’s nationalization of the union movement. So the question is, what form does National Union violence take in response to corrupt police thugs hired by the corporations to bust the National Union? Comments:2
Posted by James Bowery on Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:13 | # That was, of course, my point. However, there some things here that are different at least in their relative impact: The union forces have not been fighting back the way they have previously. This is most likely the result of the exploitation of anti-racist indoctrination by the union busters. Some questions are how long does this go on, how does it break down and how does the Holocaustian theocracy change due to the corrupt exploitation-for-profit of anti-racist doctrine? 3
Posted by Furius on Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:27 | # When the unions engaged in violence (and Businessmen reponded with violence of their own), workers were fighting for their very survival - bread on the table. It is impossible for us to imagine today what this may have been like, to face economic conditions bordering on starvation. It was this desperation which made whites extremely intolerant of not just non-white workers brought in to break the unions (such as the Chinese in the post-Civil War period) but also of immigrants - all the unions opposed immigration because it undermined their power. Today, no one objects in this way because people have plenty of food and all the comforts of home. 4
Posted by James Bowery on Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:43 | # “all the comforts of home” hardly exist when women are turned into monstrous parodies of wives and lovers. Your point is, however, well taken. It is far more insidiously powerful to destroy a population through demographic collapse founded on corrupting its women than it is to try to destroy a population through outright caloric deprivation. I think, however, that this fits with my position on the exploitation of Holocaustianity’s anti-racist indoctrination—of which pimping out white women under the cover of “careers” as well as welfare assistance and “intervention of social workers”, are all an integral part. This is essentially an Africanization of society. However, I think you are underestimating the degree to which working class white men are already in danger of suffering serious immediate-need deprivation. The low-end jobs are being taken out by Mexicans and the welfare bureaucracy is under the control of minorities, Jews and pimped-out white women. Agreed, a man without a family is more likely to simply go away and die of a drug overdose or be otherwise incarcerated, but when the economy starts to go south this phenomenon will expand dramatically and that’s where the answers to my questions wait. 5
Posted by Desmond Jones on Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:13 | # It’s only one aspect of Labo(u)r’s position on immigration. The internationalists, in the US Labour movement held very different ideas to restrictionists. Solidarity or Survival?American Labor and European Immigrants, 1830-1924 Book by A. T. Lane;
6
Posted by James Bowery on Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:37 | # Yes, but the communists (international socialists) did not get their way in FDR’s “New Deal”. The New Deal was essentially a way to keep centralization of wealth in private hands during a demand-side collapse of the economy without violent revolution killing the wealthy. They had to compromise and keep immigration restricted as part of that Deal—or the wealthy of the US would likely have been killed. 7
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:49 | # Dennis Mangan has an entry up which is somewhat à propos:
Post a comment:
Next entry: Saudi and the West
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Furius on Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:00 | #
Jay Gould once said, “I can pay half the working class to kill the other half”.
There is nothing new in what you describe.