What, no Jews in BNP Britain?

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 09 September 2009 16:30.

The BNP’s lawyers have proposed that the party introduces an ethnic monitoring form, in line with the mad strivings after equality that afflict hundreds of public bodies in the UK. The idea of Evil Nazis monitoring people’s ethnicity is likely to occasion John Wadham and his anti-English colleagues in the EHRC rather more unease than schadenfreude. But that’s their outlook.

The draft form can be perused via the link at the bottom of this article (pdf). It is exhaustive on the subject of native British ethnicity - Archipel Normandian, anyone? But not so all the rest of the globe’s by no means migrationally economic and vibrant diversity, who hardly receive racially-equal treatment.

But one ethnic group stands out by it’s absence. Yes, it’s the one which never likes to be monitored - never mind named - yet defines itself obsessively night and day.

Looking at the available options to tick, I suppose Jewish must simply mean English to the BNP. Except it passes down the matrilinear line as some sort of jus judaicus. Or maybe Jewish is just a religion, and we needn’t take any account of it at all. The one thing that is certain is that leaving Jews off the form is intended as a sop, not a snub.

Tags: That Question Again

Comments:

Posted by Dan Dare on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:56 | #

The curious thing is though that Jews are considered to be a recognised racial group for the purposes of the Race Relations Act. The Board of Deputies has actively lobbied in Parliament to ensure that recognition of that status does not get forgotten.

Submission from the Board of Deputies of British Jews

INTRODUCTION

1. The Board of Deputies of British Jews welcomes the opportunity to make this submission to the Select Committee on Religious Offences. The Board is the representative body and voice of the British Jewish community. It was founded in 1760.

2. We have previously made written and oral submissions on related themes to the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee inquiry on Racially Motivated Attacks and Harassment (1993), Lord Lloyds’s inquiry into Legislation Against Terrorism (1996), the Home Secretary’s Consultation Document on Legislation Against Terrorism (1998), and the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee inquiry into the War Against Terrorism (2002).

INCITEMENT TO RACIAL HATRED

3. The Jewish community is covered by the provisions of the Race Relations Acts. This was established by the judgment in Mandla v. Dowell Lee [1983], 2A.C.548, HL which recognised the Jewish and Sikh communities as distinct racial groups. Subsequent cases brought before the courts have upheld the ruling. As a result, the Jewish community is afforded protection against incitement to racial hatred.
…

Link…

Posted by Frank on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:44 | #

They’re the only race/religion that may be both, one, or neither at convenience.

In America we went with culturalism, and the party members bought it while everyone else continued to accuse us of “racism”. So we’ve continually moved further anti-racist ever since, and the party members have sincerely converted along with each move.

In politics… never retreat, never retract… never admit a mistake.

Posted by John Beatson on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:27 | #

The idea of Evil Nazis monitoring people’s ethnicity is ...

Look at any government form, especially local and you will see them all asking for peoples ethnicity

Are they evil Nazis

When the BNP lie cheats and embezzle the British people then condemn them, but they are the only ones trying to save Britain and our people

Posted by Captainchaos on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:40 | #

The curious thing is though that Jews are considered to be a recognised racial group for the purposes of the Race Relations Act.

Hey Dare, if you had to choose between National Socialism and the genetic annihilation of the English which would you choose? I’d appreciate a straight and no equivocating bullshit.

Posted by Frank on Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:00 | #

CC,

if you had to choose between food and water for a year’s subsistence, which would pick?

Posted by Dan Dare on Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:52 | #

Oo-er Cap’n you certainly come up with some corkers!

If it’s all the same to you I’m going to pass on the beautiful three-piece lounge suite and hold out for the blow on the head.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sstrj15XpWQ

Posted by Captainchaos on Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:48 | #

Oy vey Danny! The contention that you would not throw your support behind a resurgent National Socialism given it were the only hope of saving the English from genetic annihilation is about as plausible as some honor being salvaged from the cowardly wreckage wrought by Daddy Dare as he burned up little tow-headed Krauts like candles - that is, assuming you are a sincere racialist. It’s bad juju squared when you betray your blood and the chickens come home to roost.

Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:19 | #

Jews have, as usual, got the best of both worlds - a religion in the US and a race in UK.